K&S AG
XETRA:SDF
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
10.06
14.915
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
K&S AG
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to welcome you to our Q1 Teams conference. And let me directly start with the development of our business on Slide #3. After the sale of our Americas operating unit, we defined our new corporate strategy, which states potash and magnesium products are our core business. The market environment for these products is very attractive. And I would like to point out that potash prices already strongly increased during 2021. In Brazil, prices had already more than tripled to USD 800 per tonne by the end of the year. Due to uncertainties of market participants regarding the geopolitical situation and supply constraints, prices increase even further. And now please turn to Slide 4.
We want to share a closer look at our key figures with you. Our EBITDA increased from EUR 126 million to EUR 524 million in the first quarter. The positive effects of higher prices, especially in the Agriculture customer segment, more than compensated lower volumes and cost inflation mainly from freight, energy and material. Even with the weather-related below average de-icing salt business, we could slightly increase revenues in the Industry+ customer segment.
K+S not only translated the strong operating performance and favorable market conditions in higher earnings but also in significantly higher cash flows. The adjusted free cash flow increased from minus EUR 15 million in the first quarter of 2021 to almost EUR 300 million. Deducting the measures we have already implemented to utilize the additional liquidity, the adjusted free cash flow amounts to more than EUR 100 million. And these measures were already mentioned in our conference call in March and included the reduction of factoring and the purchase of further CO2 certificates from 2026 onwards. These excellent results in the first quarter further reduced our leverage rate to 0.4x. And this brings us to Slide #5.
Following the sale of the Americas operating unit, we took a major step towards significantly reducing our net financial liabilities. By the end of March, only EUR 520 million remained compared with EUR 3.2 billion at the end of 2020. Our target is clear: we want to get back to an investment-grade rating. As you can see, our leverage ratio is clearly better than the required level. We take our homework seriously to also be prepared for times with lower potash prices.
Now let's take a closer look to our outlook. Yield prospects in Agriculture remain intact. They also provide an incentive to increase yields per hectare through balanced use of fertilizers. Not only the prices of various input materials, such as fertilizers, have risen for farmers, but also the prices of their agriculture products have improved significantly. For important crops such as soybeans and corn, expected margins are above the multiyear average. Furthermore, global inventories for key agriculture products are at historically low levels. Therefore, potash demand is high. The uncertainties about sanctions against Russia and Belarus, however, severely limit global potash supply.
And Slide 7 shows that Russia and Belarus account for 32% of global potash production. While we can be quite sure that almost no material is leaving Belarus, it is not clear what volumes are exported from Russia.
Apart from the short-term constraint on supply, it should be noted that most projects for capacity expansions are coming from Russia and Belarus. And these are likely to be at least delayed due to the current situation. That's because of financing has become challenging for producers and required materials or contractors originate from other European countries.
At the same time, Russia and Ukraine are important suppliers of agriculture products. As large portions of these volumes are likely to disappear this year, maximizing yields through balanced fertilization by remaining farmers becomes even more crucial to the world's food supply. And therefore, market conditions remain positive. This brings me to our EBITDA outlook on Slide 8.
At this point, I repeat that it is unbelievable for me to witness another war in Europe. I'm still hoping for a quick end. The situation is confusing and dynamic. Our revenues in the affected regions are very low, and we do not have any assets here.
All figures I'm presenting regarding outlook assume unrestricted production in the further course of the year. So no downtime is caused by potential disruptions in the gas supply. The current situation makes it impossible to reliably assess the security of energy supplies.
In our ad hoc modification of April 13, we raised the expected EBITDA to EUR 2.3 billion to EUR 2.6 billion. Even our prior outlook of EUR 1.6 billion to EUR 1.9 billion would have been the best result in K+S history. The strong increase in prices for our products in the Agriculture customer segment more than compensate for cost increases in all areas, energy, logistics and material.
Assuming CapEx of a good EUR 400 million, this is expected to result in free cash flow of EUR 1 billion to EUR 1.2 billion before one-off effects. As indicated, we plan to use around EUR 230 million of this for the repayment of our factoring program and the early purchase of CO2 certificates. Almost EUR 200 million of this were already paid in the first quarter. Ladies and gentlemen, and now please turn to Slide #9.
On the energy price side, we were very forward looking for our production sites and secured attractive terms even before the outbreak of war. We obviously depend on the reliable supply of natural gas like almost all industrial operations in Germany. The processing of the crude salt as well as the generation of heat and electricity at our production site is based almost entirely on natural gas. Only our winter sites on the Werra plant is mainly supplied with energy by a waste-to-energy plant. A cutback in the supply of natural gas in Europe would lead to supply bottlenecks in the German industry, including for critical infrastructure.
Our products are used as fertilizers for agriculture, as an intermediate for the chemical and pharmaceutical industry and as food and animal feed. We, therefore, make a system-relevant contribution to society. If, however, our gas requirement cannot be covered, this will lead to production restrictions.
Against the background of the Ukraine crisis, however, one thing becomes apparent. The strategic decision of K+S to build a new potash plant in Bethune in Canada and, therefore, to diversify our production regionally is clearly confirmed. Bethune is not only an example for risk diversification, it also represents our most efficient and largest growth project.
With Slide #10, I would like to go back to our corporate strategy.
We have always made clear that the largest management focus is on optimizing the existing and announced what we will provide regular updates on projects. As such, I would like to further comment on the ramp-up in Bethune on Slide #11.
We do have strategies for all our sites. Considering the high free cash flow expected for this year, we have decided to increase the Bethune expenses budget for 2022 by EUR 50 million. These additional expenses do not only target the short-term acceleration but proactively also the longer-term ramp-up of the site. And this requires primarily engineering, operations and IT services to raise the development status of the further expansion stages. In total, we aim to hire more than 70 additional people for the project this year. However, please do not expect the ramp-up to increase by more than 50,000 tonnes to 150,000 tonnes as of next year.
On the next slide, I will comment on the other planned uses of the cash we will generate this year.
Besides the ramp-up in Bethune, I already mentioned the repayment of factoring and the early purchase of CO2 certificates. In addition, we will propose to the Annual General Meeting to pay a dividend of EUR 0.20 per share, which corresponds to a total of EUR 38 million. A further step towards debt reduction will be taken in June when the bond matures that we are not planning to refinance.
The final bullet point on the slide is very important to us. At times when a war is raging in Europe and its impact cannot yet be assessed, it is important to keep the balance sheet robust with low debt levels to steer the company through uncertain times.
Overall, K+S had a very successful start into the year and the market environment remains attractive.
And this brings me to the end of my presentation. Thank you for your attention. And we are now looking forward to your questions, and I hand over to Julia for some technical details.
Yes. Thank you, Dr. Lohr, and hello also from my side. Before we start with Q&A, a few technical notes.
This conference is webcasted live, and a replay of the webcast will be available on our website afterwards.
[Operator Instructions]
This brings us to the first question of Christian Faitz.
You are muted.
Okay. Now we unmuted, I hope. Julia, Burkhard, two questions, if I may.
So first question first. With NPK customers not being able to take volume in Q1 or sufficient volume due to nitrogen unavailability, has this changed in the meantime? And also, what do you make of the stories of farmers taking holidays, demand destruction on the farmer side due to high fertilizer prices, et cetera? Is this actually evidenced by your salespeople who talk to their customers on a regular basis? Or is this just a myth and demand continues to be high because farmer affordability is clearly there?
Yes. Thank you, Christian, for that question, and that's a very important one. First message is this year and most probably next year as well, supply will be the limiting factor and not demand. Yes, we have some impact from availability of nitrogen and some farmer are not using other fertilizers if not be able to use nitrogen. Of course, the high price also has some impact, but that is limited due to what I mentioned earlier, the high prospects of making good money for the farmers as well. And this is more or less only a European issue.
We are seeing some weather-related issues in North America, but the rest of the world shows a very strong demand, and the gaps that we see due to the impacts I just mentioned are by far less than the lost supply. And that's, again, supply is limiting the demand this year and at least 2023 as well.
Okay. That's good to know. Then second question in your CFO function, use of cash. Many investors are increasingly asking. You have your -- obviously, you have your dividend policy in place with the optionality of paying out that kind of bonus element in there. But would you consider at some point also doing share buybacks or something else?
First of all, we are never ruling out anything. But when I talk about the dividend, yes, we are now, in 2022, in a very positive environment, but the dividend is paid for the outcome of 2021. And the dividend we are going to pay, the EUR 38 million, is already 42% of the free cash flow that we have earned last year.
If, of course, this year will end in a way that we are seeing and forecasting, and I believe that we will see these numbers, then the dividend will look significantly different to the 2021 dividend. But we have not even discussed potential share buybacks, but everything is possible.
The next question comes from Lisa De Neve from Morgan Stanley.
I have two. The first one is you've guided to mid-triple-digit input inflation for 2022. Can you share a little bit more granularity on the energy, logistics components and the mining materials inflation component of that. Just spitting it out, if possible, would be great.
Yes, thank you for that question. As I mentioned in my speech, we have three items which are heavily impacted by inflation or cost increases. This is, first of all, energy. Luckily, we have already secured 92% of our gas consumption of 2022 and also more than 70% of 2023 and 2024, but they're not -- or not covered 8%. It has an impact on our cost base, and we are talking about more than EUR 100 million higher costs than in 2021. And we are talking about another EUR 100 million each on logistics and materials. All the other cost items are moving on a very normal level.
And then coming back to the faster ramp-up of Bethune. I mean you've announced a bit of a faster ramp up, I think, about 50,000 tonnes quicker than initially set out. And as you're now starting to generate a lot of good free cash flow, and that may well be the case for the foreseeable future, would you consider nonorganic opportunities to expand your potash or specialty potash footprint?
Now here again, I would say we're not ruling out anything. For technical reasons, there is not much more in Bethune. So you know that we are talking about a secondary mining and that we have to develop wells, et cetera. So speeding up by 50,000 tonnes a year is already something, but nonorganical moves could be possible. But again, with all potential M&A transaction, what one should discuss, we also should be aware that we are in a very, very dynamic situation with a war in Europe, and I would rather keep the balance sheet and our financials robust. But we look into all opportunities.
The next question comes from [ Kyle Kang ] from Citi.
Can you hear me?
Yes, [ Kyle ]. And see you also.
Just talk a bit about how the Russia, Ukraine and Belarus situation has altered trade flows. So are you seeing any changes in the demand weightings to your different -- deliveries to different regions? That's my first question.
Yes. Thank you. You mean the deliveries from Belarus and Russia into the rest of the world, right?
That you -- also demand that you're seeing to Brazil, say, or to different regions. Or are they buying more or less as a result of Belarus?
Okay. Okay. Okay. Yes. First of all, Belarus is out of the non-Belarus and non-Russian market at all. There is some ships but not many coming from Russia into the market. So we have a huge supply gap and customers are buying whatever they can. And we know that June, July will be heavy season again in Brazil, so there is rather a shortness. And that's -- maybe that's the background of the question. We believe that current pricing is quite stable. So we are not seeing significant price decreases in any reasons -- regions.
Okay. And secondly, so the volumes in 1Q were a little disappointing, which may be down to some of the logistical issues that you've experienced. Can we expect them to return to somewhat of a normal rate for the second quarter? Are these issues going to persist?
Yes, volumes are actually less than in the first quarter of last year, which, by the way, was a good quarter. So we are a little -- roughly 200,000 tonnes short. There are some reasons behind, but the main reasons are, you mentioned one, logistics. You heard about the CP strike. That is one reason. We had some hiccups with the Deutsche Bahn here in Germany as well. Nothing which had an impact on production but on moving the material. And we had some shipments that we have expected in Q1 shipped -- slipped into Q2. And we stopped delivering for sanction reasons, the deliveries into EuroChem, that had an impact in Q1 as well. But we still see the 7.7 million tonnes for the full year 2022.
The next question is coming from Andrew Stott from UBS.
Can you hear out clearly?
Yes.
So I've got three, apologies. The first one is, what's the worst case for production cuts in Germany?
You directly start with the most difficult one.
Yes. I do think it was easy. But can you give me an idea of what it looks like? I think you mentioned one of the mines would be relatively unaffected. So I just wondered what sort of capacity utilization you might see in that scenario.
Yes. First of all, Bethune is totally out of scope because gas is not an issue in Canada. And that's why I pointed out that the decision to go into Canada with a new production site was a very, very clever one. And in Germany, every site has its own story, I would like to say. So Wintershall is maybe the easiest one. That is one of the three sites in the Werra Valley. Here, we have a waste-to-energy plant, and that can secure production at this winter side -- Wintershall site.
And then we would have to look in each single site, and we would not lose full production if, for example, we would have only 20% or 30% less gas available. But it's very, very tricky, what that mean -- would mean for us.
And, by the way, I should add that gas is only needed for energy and heat. So we don't need gas for our production process itself like some chemical industries, for example, needs gas for the production process. So we could substitute the gas. That would take time. The most probable way would be oil, and we are preparing this. And the time we would need for that differs from site to site as well. Some sites or all -- still have some requirements that we needed because they were running on oil years ago. And on some other sites, it would be -- it would take longer, but it's possible. Sorry for that long answer, but I think that was a very, very important question.
No, it's very useful. Second question was on the salt business in Europe. If you go back to the CMD in November, you obviously flagged that, that was maybe long-term noncore. Is there -- has there been any progress in your thinking on that asset?
Now I mentioned that with the new strategy that we have disclosed in November on the Capital Markets Day that salt is noncore any -- is not a core business anymore for many good reasons. But that does not mean that we are actively going to sell it. And we are quite happy with the development of that business. Although we had a weak winter, we have seen a slight increase in sales. So it's contributing to the bottom line, and that is positive. And there's no action currently.
Last question was on CO2 certificates. I think you said in the slides that you bought forward from, I think, your deficit expected from 2026. So how many years does that cover? And at what carbon price?
Yes. Theoretically, we are now fine until the end of 2028, but we are also sure that we will find ways until then to reduce our CO2 footprint so that we might even be fine for the entire trading period, so until 2030. That's why we stopped acquiring further certificates.
The next question is coming from Adrien Tamagno from Berenberg.
Just one question on price realization. How should we think about specialties and the spread versus MOP for Q2? Is it going to turn meaningfully positive in Q2 is the first one.
Yes, we have always seen that there is, yes, the premium between MOP and, for example, SOP. But with this very, very untypical price development on the MOP side, we are seeing, of course, a significantly lower premium. And we believe as long as the MOP prices are on that high level, the premium is not going to grow further. That is a mechanism that is only working in normal price environments.
Okay. And you say you want to have a crisis-proof balance sheet. So can you just provide some figures around that? Is it going to be less than 1x leverage or net cash? Or how do you define this?
Yes, we see ourselves as an investment-rated company, although the rating is not yet there. So I understand that Standard & Poor's cannot do more than two notches that they have just recently done. But that is a target we want to -- even with further use of cash, want to be in this area of investment grade rated. And that would be -- depends on which figure you take. Including our provisions, it would be 2 or 2.5x EBITDA with the net debt number.
The next question is coming from Alex Jones from Bank of America.
Great. First one just on the guidance. Could you give us some color on the price that you're assuming there? Are you assuming that potash prices are more or less flat through the rest of the year? Or any declines into the second half?
Yes. As I indicated in one of the earlier answers, we are not expecting prices to increase even more, but we are on historical high levels. But on the other hand, with this supply shortage, we are not seeing prices decreasing either. So the average price should climb quarter-by-quarter just due to the fact that the prices that we are seeing in Q1, where trades are out of -- or sales out of Q4 last year and the higher prices are rolling into our books now. But the current price environment should last for some further months on that level.
Great. That's very clear. And second question on FX. We've seen quite a marked move in the euro-dollar rate over the past couple of weeks. Could you give us some color or remind us on how that impacts your numbers, both short term, given the hedging you do, and then also as we go into '23/'24 when that hedging rolls off?
Yes. That's a perfect question for Julia.
Yes. Thank you, Alex. So right now with the current development of the U.S. dollar, for sure we have positive effects in the revenues. But the hedging we did is kind of bringing negative effects in the EBITDA. That's normal in that space. And the best case basically for 2022 is around $1.16, yes. But you should be aware that not all of the revenues are secured or are hedged because as our revenue figures are changing with all the estimates, we are kind of running behind with the securing. So it's not 400% of the revenues, which is, in today's case, a good news.
The next question is coming from a telephone number. And I cannot see the name behind it, so I hope you just mention who you are. I guess it's Markus Mayer from Baader.
When you can hear us, we cannot hear you. Maybe you are muted.
There are actually no further questions in the chat. Someone is saying something. Okay. This is [ Joerg Heineke ]. "Do you consider yourself as a takeover target in light of the tightness in the market? And if you do think there would be massive political headwind in that case."
Difficult one. Yes. No stock-listed company can be 100% sure not to be attacked from any side. But we are taking into account our current share price and taking into account the, yes, the consolidation in the market. So a competitor would not be able to do that because there wouldn't be no approval at all in all parts of the world and that I believe the probability is quite low.
I can see another question from Andrew Stott, but it might be the old risen hand. So maybe you give me a sign if you want to ask another question.
Yes, I did want to follow up, actually.
Okay.
Yes. It was on the Bethune extra costs, the EUR 50 million. Is there some natural cost inflation in that number as well? Or is that just purely the extra production you're hoping to achieve?
That is purely and 100% extra measures that we take to get to 50,000 tonnes annually more.
And just to remind me, sorry, I should know this, is it 150,000 to 200,000 or 100,000 to 150,000?
100,000 to 150,000.
So one last chance for the telephone number which wants to raise a question. It is 232 at the end. No. Then we don't have any further -- oh, there's another question from Christian Faitz. No, he's taking that back. All right.
No?
Okay. He wants to do it.
All right. Yes. Sorry for the gaslighting, by the way. Our plants are broken in the office, and lights.
So on Bethune, can you remind us of your plans to ship volumes into the U.S. rather than into China and Brazil? How are we progressing there given that, obviously, also the U.S. market is quite attractive, never mind the 4 million tonnes of -- sorry, 4 million-acre switch from corn to soy? But what are your plans there for this year in terms of shipping volumes into the U.S.?
Yes. Thank you. We are continuing to increase the volumes that we are going to ship into the U.S. We said the target is 500,000 tonnes that -- we should be able to do that maybe in '23, maybe in '24, but we are on a good way. And it should be close to 300,000 tonnes, what we are going to do this year.
And China, we are talking about different products, standard and granular. But nevertheless, you mentioned China. Due to the netback situation, we are going to reduce the Chinese volumes again compared to last year.
And we also started shipping volumes into Europe for the -- from Bethune. From (sic) [ For ] the time being, we are, yes, the last significant remaining EU producer and, yes, allocator of potash in this area, and that is our contribution to stabilize the agriculture situation here in Europe.
We have one more question from Lisa De Neve.
On the back of your comment that you're shipping more volumes into Europe, are there any logistical challenges or limitations to doing that from your Bethune side, which may be due to your production or simply the fact that there's problems in the supply chain essentially?
Now what we are doing here is bulk, and bulk is possible. It's, of course, also more expensive than it was years ago, but it's possible to get shipments of bulk products from Vancouver into Europe.
And then I received two questions from Markus Mayer by email because he could not unmute himself. So one question is on the change of interest rates and the impact on the discount rate for pension and environment provisions. So the positive effect we saw in the financial result.
One by one, right?
[indiscernible]
Yes. Okay. So yes, Markus, we already had a positive effect in the financial result in Q1 coming out of that, yes. So it -- there is a positive one. And I guess if you will see further changes, this will also continue.
And the other one is the financial effect of the bond repurchase. But we didn't have a bond repurchase in the first quarter. So it was all done in Q2 of last year. And the financial effect was, first of all, a negative cash outflow but with now lower interest, which will, over time, level out.
Next in June.
And the next bond repurchase is in June, exactly. This is EUR 250 million -- EUR 200 million, yes.
No more?
No.
Okay.
Okay. We don't have any further questions, so thanks a lot for the questions. I would like to hand back to Dr. Lohr for the closing remarks.
Yes, not much left to say, but I would like to say thank you for taking the time to join this call, and thank you for the good questions. I think we have really covered everything which is important for us. And we really hope that the world is more peaceful when we see us next time on that call. And after the -- corona was not even an issue in this call. So therefore we are able to travel again, and we will see some of you live during our roadshows. Thank you very much and all the best to you. Bye.