Kion Group AG
XETRA:KGX
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
|
US |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
Machinery
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
30.64
51.36
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
US | |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US | |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I'm Stuart, your Chorus call operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining KION GROUP'S Q3 2021 Update Call. Today's presenters will be Gordon Riske, CEO of KION GROUP; and Anke Groth, CFO of KION GROUP. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Gordon Riske, CEO of KION GROUP. Please go ahead, sir.
Yes. Welcome to our update call for the third quarter 2021. And as a basis for the call, we'd like to use our Q3 '21 presentation. It's available by kiongroup.com under Investor Relations on the Publications section.We will, as usual, will be presenting in 4 parts today, and then we'll open up to the discussion for your questions. I'll begin with the key financial figures for the 9-month period 2021 and then present some strategic highlights from the past quarter for you. Anke will then provide you with a financial update, and we'll close with a confirmation of our outlook for the full year 2021. So let's get started with our key financial figures on Page 3.Overall, during the 9-month period, we're seeing very strong Q results, substantially surpassing prepandemic levels, supported by a very strong growth in both segments. Our order intake for the group grew by around 34% to EUR 9 billion. Revenue reached EUR 7.5 billion, up 26%. And adjusted EBIT almost doubled, reaching EUR 691 million, representing a margin of 9.2%. And free cash flow for the group ended up at a positive EUR 135 million. So in summary, we saw very strong growth across all metrics, which makes us feel well-positioned within our guidance ranges that we have confirmed. So a very, very good first -- very, very good third quarter. Moving on to Page 4.One important field of action, and we always talk about these strategic highlights within the framework of KION 2027 is energy and energy efficiency. And so we decided to purchase a 20% stake in ifesca, which developed software for energy management. Ifesca's software is an innovative forecasting software that uses artificial intelligence to predict how much energy will be consumed and generated particularly from renewable sources nearly in real time. This will allow customers to plan the optimum operating times for their fleets of industrial trucks to avoid peaks in loading and unloading, and in doing so significantly reducing their energy costs.Another important aspect of our long-term strategy is innovation. And the LoadRunner fits perfectly into this category. LoadRunner from Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics, IML, represents a new generation of AGVs with substantial sorting capacity. Its distributed intelligent vehicle coordination is designed to lift the high-speed AGVs to a new level of swarm robotics. The common goal of KION and Fraunhofer IML is to optimize the AI-assisted swarm technology from a basic sensor to overarching platform and launch it into the market by around the year 2025. KION licensed the LoadRunner technology from Fraunhofer for use and its international group of companies.Performance is also shown by using synergies from our multi-group approach and jointly multi-brand group approach and jointly selling solutions and also an important aspect of the KION 2027 strategy. In Q3, our brands STILL and Dematic joined and won a on a tender or jointly won a tender for Beiersdorf's state of the art production center for cosmetic products near Leipzig. Beiersdorf's new plant is a multimillion euro project and actually one of the largest investment projects in Europe. And the task was to combine all intralogistics steps from goods received, quality control, internal transport and storage of incoming materials, up to making them available for production.For goods received and dispatched manual STILL electric trucks and warehouse technology are used. Conveyor technology from Dematic provides the link between the goods-in area and the narrow aisle warehouse where 6 fully automated trucks from STILL are in operation. So autonomous trucks.In addition, the conveyor system ensures onward transport from warehouse to production where 6 fully automated high-lift stackers from STILL provide the fully automated transport of Beiersdorf's facilities. So a nice project together with STILL and Dematic.So let's move on to the market update on Page 6. The industrial truck market, again showing strong growth across the regions. The third quarter was shown a very robust development with some normalizing rates across coming after a very strong Q2 and was predominantly driven by core markets in EMEA and Americas. Western Europe was up by 38% during Q3, particularly driven by Germany, Italy and France. Eastern Europe grew even faster with around 57%. Warehouse trucks having contributed to the large -- in a large part of this growth.In North America, the strong market demand continued and thus reached a growth of 68%, supported by good development of warehouse trucks. With 67%, the growth rate in South America normalized as well, and is still acting on a very high level, particularly driven by warehousing IC trucks. And in China, unit order intake with the market decreased slightly by minus 4%, predominantly based on weaker IC truck environment.So overall, the global market for industrial trucks started to normalize. Certainly, the comps will become more difficult as we go since already last year we had stronger growth, but still with 25% at a very high base level, a very robust market. So our market does remain solid.On Page 7, the breakdown of KION's unit growth by region. Our unit order intake after an outstanding second quarter reached a very solid 63,100 units globally. In EMEA, we saw demand levels normalizing after a very strong Q2 record results in Western Europe. Orders grew by 25%, while Eastern Europe recorded growth of around 54%. Both regions especially benefited from good development of warehouse trucks.Looking on to China, KION again outperformed the market based on strong development of all truck types and reached a plus of around 26%, mainly driven by new product additions and further progress in expanded -- expanding our sales and service network. During Q3, North America benefited from the improved footprint and thus unit orders more than doubled, hence KION outperformed the market, which was predominantly driven by warehouse trucks in South and Central America. Unit order intake grew by 5% compared to a very, very strong Q3 2020 based on good performance on warehouse trucks.So in total, we did see a very strong solid third quarter. I particularly like the numbers on the world level. It's not so often that we do outperform in a quarter across the globe and for the year-to-date so far. And this is truly despite all of the challenges that we have and the availability of supplies and logistic bottlenecks that we continue to face.And with this, I'd like to hand it over to Anke, who will present the financial update.
Yes. Thanks a lot, Gordon. And hello to everybody from my side. If you turn to Page 9, you will see the key financials for the IT&S segment.During the quarter we saw an ongoing strong demand for industrial trucks, and a growth rate of around 20% for order intake despite the noticeable pre-buy effect we saw in Q2 already. At the end of September, the order book for the IT&S segment stood at almost EUR 2.4 billion, significantly up with 67% versus December 2020. As you can see by the numbers, we had a very solid third quarter, with sales growing 60% to EUR 1.6 billion. Higher volumes in new business and a strong service business were a major contributor to our improved adjusted EBIT, up 53% to EUR 144 million, lifting the adjusted EBIT margin to 8.9%.However, as you know, higher raw material expenses and tight supply chains and inefficiencies in production remained a challenge in Q3. In addition, higher personnel expenses compared to prior crisis year also impacted our profitability. A positive price assertion and further savings from our structural program partially offset the negatives. And very importantly, do not forget, if components were available sufficiently we could have shown higher revenues and EBIT in the third quarter as well as in our year-to-date.During the first 9 months of 2021 ITS recorded an order intake of EUR 5.7 billion, revenues of more than EUR 4.7 billion and an adjusted EBIT margin of 8.9%. So overall, ITS is showing a strong performance, also especially in the service business.Turning to Page 10. I wanted to give you an update on our capacity and structural program. As flagged with our Q2 results, we are currently only focusing on the structural optimizations rather than on capacity needs, quite obvious looking at order intake. We confirm the targeted EUR 80 million to EUR 100 million cumulated cost savings by 2023. We expect EUR 35 million to EUR 45 million to drop through this year after EUR 11 million savings in Q3 and EUR 29 million in the first 9 months. So you can see we are very well on track here.Page 11 summarizes the key financials for the segment Supply Chain Solutions. SCS developed very strongly, reaching a new record high order intake of EUR 1.4 billion. Regionally, demand increased substantially in North America and APAC while slowing somewhat down in Europe. Overall, the order intake was driven by projects for the e-commerce, general merchandise and grocery vertical.The order backlog at the end of September increased to roughly EUR 3.7 billion, of which around 22% remains to be converted into revenue during the fourth quarter, of course provided sufficient availability of intermediate products, but with that covering more than 85% of our targeted revenue in Q4. Revenue grew significantly, reaching EUR 937 million in Q3, clearly fueled by business solutions, up by 53%, and customer services growing around 10%. Higher volumes were the main margin driver during the quarter, lifting the adjusted EBIT margin to 11.7%. Despite the ongoing negative shift in the sales mix caused by the strong project business clearly outpacing currently the service business.Material cost increases are a slight headwind in addition to the buildup of our workforce in order to prepare for the further growth of our business. While we hardly had any inefficiencies yet from tight supply chains, this might impact us more during the fourth quarter in the SCS segment.For the 9 months period SCS recorded an order intake of around EUR 3.3 billion and revenues of EUR 2.8 billion with an adjusted EBIT margin of 12%. So overall, demand for warehouse automation solutions remained very strong, and we have continued building up resources, ensuring the execution of our strong order book also in the future.Moving to Page 12. The summary for the key financials for the group. During the third quarter KION saw an order intake of EUR 3.1 billion, up 34% versus prior year, benefiting from the strong demand for material handling solutions. With this, the total order book grew 35% to almost EUR 6 billion by the end of September, driven by both segments. Based on the strong performance of our businesses, revenue increased by 24% to EUR 2.6 billion in the third quarter. The adjusted EBIT for the group increased to EUR 229 million for a margin of 8.9%, which is stronger than the levels seen in 2020, somewhat lower than in Q2, mainly impacted by the rising material costs and ongoing tight supply chains causing cost inefficiencies, as you know, and limiting revenues and EBIT generation. For the first 9 months of 2021 KION and order intake of close to EUR 9 billion, revenues of EUR 7.5 billion and an adjusted EBIT margin of 9.2%.Page 13 shows the reconciliation from adjusted EBITDA to the net income for the group. Reported EBIT included positive nonrecurring items of EUR 1 million in the past quarter. Net financial expenses decreased substantially to only minus EUR 6 million, supported by a positive interest result from our leasing business, lower expenses for pensions and a lower FX impact from financing. Taxes of course increased nominally, reaching minus EUR 64 million in Q3, equal to a tax rate of 31.5%. The tax rate for the 9-month period however was 28%, and that was in line with the corridor we anticipate for full year 2021 of 26% to 31%.Overall, we ended the third quarter with a net income of EUR 140 million and an EPS of EUR 1.04, while we saw a net income of EUR 431 million and earnings per share of EUR 3.26 in the 9-months period.Moving to the free cash flow statement on Page 14. In the 9-month period, free cash flow amounted to EUR 135 million. The main driver for the free cash flow development was the increase in net working capital, driven by significantly higher inventory levels in ITS. And in our SCS segment, the tight supply chains triggered some delays in certain project milestones, resulting in delayed milestone invoicing and therefore later cash-in.In Q3 we recorded a negative free cash flow of minus EUR 167 million. This is of course also impacted by the higher net working capital needs. As illustrated in the graph at the bottom, this year's free cash flow development does not follow the typical seasonal pattern. However, based on the unchanged outlook for free cash flow as well as for the other KPIS, we expect a strong cash-in in Q4.Page 15 shows our net debt as well as the corresponding leverage ratios of the business. At the end of September, net financial debt increased by EUR 51 million to EUR 931 million, mainly driven by the buildup of net working capital, particularly in the third quarter. However, our leverage ratio, based on net financial debt improved to 0.5 versus 0.6 at the end of 2020 as the only slight increase in net debt was more than compensated by our sound operating performance.Our net pension liabilities decreased further during Q3, falling below EUR 1.2 billion end of September, mainly due to higher discount rates. So leverage on industrial net debt decreased substantially to 2.2, down from 3.1 December 2020.Yes. And with this, back to you, Gordon, for the outlook 2021.
Yes. Thank you, Anke. I'm on Page 17. So based on our positive business situation and financial performance year-to-date, which we just explained, in KION GROUP, we anticipate that we will achieve the already raised targets of 2021. Remember, we upgraded our targets some time ago, Q2. And so given the current order situation that is very healthy in both segments, we do expect that order intake at both the group level and at the individual segment level to be at the upper end of the target range.Despite the current situation in the procurement markets and all the logistics problems and material costs, et cetera, we do believe that we are still well-positioned to reach the targets for all the key performance indicators, including revenue, adjusted EBIT and free cash flow and return on capital employed.Even though the outlook remains positive, there is always uncertainty in the economic environment, particularly the risk of further increases in commodity prices and the availability of intermediate products.Looking on to Page 19, you see our financial calendar. We will meet again soon in a virtual format. You are all invited to attend our virtual analyst and investor event, which will take place on November 3, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. CET. And on a personal note, as this is my last update call as CEO of the KION GROUP, for those of you that are on this call but will not participate in the November 3 event, I'd like to personally thank all of you for the dialogue and the great questions and inputs that you've given to us and your coverage of a very special company called KION GROUP. And wish you all continued success in the future.And with that, we'd like to close the formal part of this update call and hand it over to the operator so that we can answer your questions.
[Operator Instructions] First question is from the line of Sven Weier from UBS.
The first one is actually a follow-up on your guidance that you've just talked about. And I was just wondering what is the rationale for not taking the adjusted EBIT guidance also towards the higher end of the range, like you did on the order intake. Because if we look at the implications for Q4, let's say, at the midpoint of the guidance, that would be quite a drastical sequential decline on the EBIT side. And we also had, obviously, one of your biggest peers last night raising guidance by 10%. So I was just wondering what's different in your case? That's the first one.
No, maybe not so much difference. The fact is in all the material supply cost of raw material is quite uncertain at this moment and has not really recovered. I mean, just one small example, a EUR 0.24 rubber gasket prevents you from delivering a EUR 25,000 forklift truck. And so if you look at the whole thing, yes, we have a great quarter. We have great momentum and order intake. Who knows how the next couple of weeks will pan out. But we definitely know we are missing material. We are having some issues getting the stuff out the door. And that's reason we took a somewhat precautious outlook. Anke, maybe you want to add a couple of comments to that.
No, you're absolutely right, Gordon. So I would say material cost headwinds, that is not too difficult to predict that now. We are end of October. And I think we gave a very decent estimate to the market. But the whole point of supply chain inefficiencies that will, as I said, cause some additional costs in SCS in the fourth quarter. And also, the predictability is somewhat more difficult than with respect to material costs. So that's the reason why on SCS we do not give a more narrow guidance range. And for ITS as well we have supply chain inefficiencies, as Gordon has just described.
And can I just follow up on that regarding the raw mats? Because I think you are obviously for the full year expecting high double digit, low triple digit. How much of that did you have so far this year? So what's left for Q4 on that side?
Yes, we can definitely first of all, give the good message that for the full year I would rather say it will not be hitting triple digit, but it will hit high double digit. If we look into the ITS segment, the peak was reached in Q3 for material cost headwinds. That is based on the fact that we had some negotiations with suppliers ongoing throughout the year. So in Q3 we also had some one-offs in our numbers. But in Q4 it will still be low double-digit for ITS. And on SCS it will be somehow mid- to high single digit. But in total, for the full year we will reach a high double-digit margin impact. Again, the low triple-digit we can rule out, but it will be high double digit.
Okay. And the second question is more of a strategic question I had. Obviously you had another very strong performance on SCS orders. And yet when I look at the share price, when I look at the implied valuation multiples, there is not much of a big difference between the truck and the SCS business. Now you have a pure-play listed peer with AutoStore. And obviously the valuation is quite punchy there. I was just wondering, what is your strategy to crystallize the value of SCS more tangibly? Is it that you would like to make the synergies between the 2 businesses clearer? Or is it also an option for you in the long-term to be open-minded to what's listing and minority stake in the business?
Yes. We don't want to jump ahead, and that's certainly a task for the next CEO and team coming up, but that's a clear invitation to come to the virtual analyst and investor event where you can get a little bit more flavor on what we're doing and what measures we're undertaking to increase our great performance and kind of the perspective of the coming years of our KION 2027 strategy. And I do believe that at some point logic does win and the high -- you called it punchy valuations, may not always be the true underlying value. And I think we still have a lot of potential in our shares as that becomes more evident of what capabilities and what kind of real results we deliver, not only in revenues but in true profitability.
Next question is from the line of George Featherstone from Bank of America.
My first one would be, [ of course you're seeing ] good order momentum so far in Q3 and also in Q2. Just wanted to talk maybe about the margin quality of the backlog in both of the businesses. Could you give us some color there? Is it accretive to where you see current margins?
Yes. Thanks for the question. Margin quality of the backlog, I would say in ITS it's rather in line. But what we have seen is a positive price absorption for our products in the market environment we are in. You know that we had a second price increase for ITS, which we have put in place beginning of July. And with the long lead times, it takes a little bit of time until that will be visible, but that will definitely impact our business in 2022. And you know that beginning of the year we will also always consider another price step. In SCS I would also say that's very much in line. So no noticeable difference in the backlog margin we are seeing. The mix, if we are selling more projects in North America versus Europe, that's always somewhat an important factor of there is a margin differential between the 2 regions, and then what kind of revenue conversion we have in that region. But from a sold margin, no major difference is visible.
Great. And second question would be on the truck market. The data suggests that you've had solid outperformance in the global truck market. I wondered if you could provide some color on what exactly is driving this? Are there any particular end markets where demand has been strong? And also, if you could elaborate on the dynamics in some of the regions like China and North America, where you've materially outperformed, but also in Europe where performance appears to have lagged the wider market.
Well, as you see, recovery, we were hard-hit last year in IC trucks and in general counterbalanced trucks, and all of those heavier industries have come back. So that's been one of the cornerstones of our improved performance. In China, we have introduced new products. And that is also helping outperform in China. But I would say mainly in the world, looking at it, this whole topic of electrification, electric trucks and warehouse trucks are perhaps the biggest driver. And we're able to deliver that. And I think looking forward to this year and next year, I mean, we ramped up 3 factories this year [indiscernible] and Jinan is being ramped up, which will go into full swing next year. So that capacity will be in place to continue the good drive that we have in the growth of the forklift business.
Next question is from the line of Katie Self from Morgan Stanley.
Just a couple. Firstly, just on the cash. I was wondering if you could give us a kind of breakdown of the key drivers into Q4. I think it's going to require quite a substantial cash inflow to get to the sort of midpoint of the guidance, something around EUR 300 million, EUR 400 million just in the quarter. Could you just elaborate a bit on how much of that is inventory unwind? How much is down payments from SCS, those different factors? And then secondly, Gordon, probably just a bigger picture one for you. We're hearing a lot of mixed messages around the issues in the supply chains, and not just for the industrial trucks manufacturers but for broader industrials. I wonder if we could get your view on, a, when do you expect those to normalize? I appreciate that's a crystal ball question. But just from the conversations you're having with customers on the ground, have you noticed any changes already? Or is that still seeming a way off? And then B, for KION, how quickly can production and shipping to customers ramp back to full speed once that supply chain normalizes?
Yes. I'll start with the second question while we look at the cash flow calculation. We had at the beginning of the Q1 2021 a scenario where that would start to get better towards the end of 2021 and the first quarter of '22. I would say that's out 6 months. So I do expect that the -- because demand is simply higher and supply logistics paths are probably not to be so greatly improved until somewhere mid-2022 or beyond. So that's something that we're going to have to deal with and live with. I am a little bit more upbeat about our own ability to recover from what we are. We do have a high inventory level. We have a huge order book. The forklift alone is 67% bigger order book than December 2020. So we have been preparing for that. And we have also upgraded our supply chain management. So back to our key suppliers and kind of planning the volumes of 2022 and '23. So I think once things start to clear out, we will be able to recover fairly quickly. Normally a forklift you can get in 8 to 12 weeks, and we're at a half year and beyond right now. So that can turn around fairly quickly. And with the capacity, as I said, we have a new plant in Poland ramping up. We have -- we upgraded another one in StĹ™Ăbro, one in Jinan starting next year. We will also have some capacity constraints lifted that have hurt us in the past years when markets develop quickly. So I'm pretty bullish on when we can recover. But on the market generally, that's certainly going to stick with us for a few more quarters.
On the cash flow, first of all, Katie, I would say we have given a guidance within the range, and it's EUR 100 million range. So I -- and that is because there are always some -- I would not say uncertainties, but it depends a little bit also on the project milestones, the billing, when customers are paying prepayments and so on. But generally, of course, our inventories will go down especially in the ITS segment. There we had the highest inventory buildup in Q3 now. But we will also see a positive impact on the cash assets and liabilities, which is driving SCS because we will get into more milestone billing. Once parts are there retrofits can be done on the project. We can also build the milestones. And then it's depending a little bit because we are already end of October, it's depending a little bit on the payment term of the respective customer if that still can come in until the end of this year or if there are longer payment terms. But in general, inventory will go down on the ITS side and therefore freeing up cash as well as on the contract, asset contract liability side. And in total, we stick to the guidance we have given which I know quite a broad range, but that's because of the situation we are in.
Next question is from the line of Martin Wilkie from Citi.
It's Martin from Citi. So I have a couple of questions. The first one on Supply Chain Solutions. You talked about the backlog conversion. Just to clarify, if we look at your revenue guidance for the year, which implied the low end that less than the 22% conversion that you talk about on Slide 11 would actually happen. Just to understand, you have talked obviously about some supply chain friction in components. Is that also site access risk? Just to understand what would drive the lower end of that revenue range in SCS given the strength of your backlog? And that's the first question.
Quite frankly. Could you repeat the question? So the 22% of the…
Yes. So...
It will somehow be 85% of the midpoint guidance. And that is quite comfortable because we always have in every quarter also ad hoc service. So the service revenues are coming in. And therefore, the level for reaching the midpoint of the guidance is quite comfortable with the conversion of the backlog into revenues. It's not only the project revenues which are then bringing -- or the backlog of the projects which is bringing the revenues, but also ad hoc smaller projects plus services.
Yes. And so that's why I was wondering why the lower end of the range was still there because it would look like you'd have quite a negative effect for the low end of the revenue guidance range in Supply Chain Solutions were that to come to fruition. So I wondering if you had concerns over site access to be able to access projects and just to understand what would drive the lower end of the range if it were to happen.
Okay. Yes. Potentially the availability of components, but we are -- we have said that for order intake we will reach the upper level of the guidance. For all other KPIS, we have said we deem us well-positioned within the guidance ranges we have given. So we have not further specified it for 1 or the other KPI. Yes.
Okay. No, that's helpful. If I could just, an unrelated question on Supply Chain Solutions. Just to understand what the impact is of some of these shortages and perhaps customers keeping older trucks for longer if they can't get a new truck and what that effect has on your leasing business and trucks return to you and rental. I mean are you seeing tights in the rental market? Or is the sort of end of lease conversion of trucks back into rental? Is that sort of fairly uneffective?
No, we see much higher utilization rates of our short-term rental fleet and so forth, of course, because we are purposely at this point putting the priority and delivery of new trucks rather than backfilling as maybe some other competitors have done, backfilling into and renewing the rental fleet. So also the rental fleet is getting a little bit older than it should be because we are sacrificing all that capacity and putting it into the new truck because of the delivery situation. So we have a good -- great utilization rate, but that's perhaps an opportunity next year when things get a little bit more normal to refresh the short-term rental fleet a little bit.
And let me add, Gordon. If you look at our service business and the split we are giving, you can also see that -- and potentially it's also based on the situation we are seeing in the new business. Our service business is progressing very well. The rental business is substantially up, as well as the used-truck business. So 1 or the other customer might also tend to buy a used truck and not only renting a truck.
[Operator Instructions] Next question is from the line of Gael de-Bray from Deutsche Bank.
Could you talk a bit about the potential lessons you might have learned from the current supply challenges. Do you see a need to change the supply chain organization in one way or the other in the near to longer term? And do you think you might have to structurally build up higher levels of inventories, maybe of certain components? You mentioned gaskets, for example, could that be something you will have to do in the future?
Yes. I mean, what we have right now is certainly quite an unusual situation. I don't think there's any time that, at least I can recall, that automotive factories and other factories, building homes with wood, and you name it what material is missing, truck drivers, everything at the same time. I think that's not something that should be assumed as the basis for a business plan. Having said that, as technology changes and all of our trucks become more electrified and with lithium-ion or fuel cell technology, it changes a bit of our vertical integration. We announced our joint venture with BMZ for assembling lithium cell. We make our own electrical motors. And so our value-add or the level of vertical integration where we make it ourselves or have a much bigger influence on the delivery of these components, that will certainly increase with the change in the technology. So I think that is -- that will help us deliver better and have it more in grip, but it's more of a result of the change in technology and the need to secure the spare parts business after that. The other question, the inventory levels, I mean they're quite high right now. I mean a good working capital company has to be an efficient use of capital. We're getting money from investors. So we don't want to solve the problems with building up our inventories. We want to solve the problems with doing the right things and being more efficient where we can. So that's to me not really a strategy just to make your warehouses bigger. It's nice if our customers make bigger warehouses, so they have more need to buy forklifts, but we should stay away from trying to solve that problem just by increasing our level of inventory.
And so given this same delivery constraints during the quarter, what sort of inventory excess did you have for IT&S at the end of September?
The inventory in excess, it's a little -- in excess, yes, it's a little bit difficult. If we look at the level in prior year, we had EUR 277 million net working capital, but we also had lower orders. Now we are at EUR 448 million. And as I said, the buildup in inventories came mainly -- it's predominantly IT'S. So the EUR 448 million you are seeing, out of that I think EUR 368 million is inventory buildup. And again, it's predominantly ITS. At the normalized level quite frankly it's depending a lot on the level of business activity. We do have supply chains too affected and so on. So I would refrain here, I'm really sorry, but I don't think it would be appropriate to give you a normalized level somehow.
Okay. Okay. I understand. But just to be clear, there was no impact on -- from this inventory buildup on the margin this quarter for IP&S?
No. Let me say it like this. If we -- as we said, if we would have been able to get all the components for the trucks, we would have seen higher revenues and also on high EBIT and margin [indiscernible].
Next question is from the line of Will Turner from Goldman Sachs.
I have a couple of questions on the order developments during the quarter. And the first one is on Supply Chain Solutions. Obviously a very strong number for the quarter. But how much of it was made up of large orders? And how come you decided not to increase the overall full year guidance for the order intake. Is it -- is there an element of the timing of orders just falling in at the end of 3Q, which would have otherwise have fallen into 4Q? And then the second one is on the industrial trucks order book. It's probably somewhere near an all-time high, I can imagine. Do you think within that order book is there -- are there any customers that are potentially double-booking orders? Have you done anything to kind of like increased screening or possibly require deposits on orders given obviously such strong demand that you're seeing?
Let me start with the second one and then the first one. The -- we have no evidence of double-booking. We know most of our customers pretty well and our dealers and so forth. A dealer might order an extra forklift at this point. But with the market, we just have -- perhaps a small safety cushion in there, but really double-booking as a general theme, that's not the case. And we do, as you say, screen those things and to make sure that that's not getting messed up. So no, we don't see that right now. And it is at an all-time high. That's right.
Yes. With respect to the other point you asked for the large orders and the proportion we have seen in Q3, so 65% of the order intake in Q3 have been large orders. So that's following the trend we have seen already in Q2, that we are somehow back to large orders from only 8% of medium size, so EUR 20 million to EUR 40 million. And the remainder are small orders. Again, it's mainly the same pattern as in Q2. And I think when you asked the question why we haven't raised the guidance for order intake and that have chosen that we are at the upper end of the guidance level. First of all, raising the guidance only for 1 KPI might be 1 factor which we discussed. But as -- it's not very long ahead of -- behind us that we have spoken about or heard from you it's a lumpy business. And you know that 1 order, 1 significant large order can make a huge difference. If it comes in Q4 or if there is a slippage into Q1. So we have very large orders. We have orders above EUR 500 million, and that makes a difference. And therefore we have chosen to tell you that we are at the upper end of the guidance, but we have not changed our guidance range.
Next question is from the line of Akash Gupta from JPMorgan.
I have just 1 question and that is on Supply Chain Solutions. So if you look at Q3 and also year-to-date, we have seen very strong growth. And you have highlighted before that this is in part driven by COVID-19, which is accelerating demand. The question I have is -- and if you look at your market share, do you see any evidence whether you are gaining market share, which may be meaning that you are growing faster than the market? Or like when you look at your hit rate in your pipeline, what is your sense of your market share compared to where it was, let's say, 12, 18 months ago?
Yes. I mean, overall the market has been very strong, but we do have some evidence. I don't have enough independent. It's unfortunately not like the forklift business where you have independent statistics. But we do have some evidence that we have gained market share in distribution centers and the Dematic SCS business in general in the past 2 quarters.
Follow up to that is that, what are the KPIs that needs to fulfill before you book an order? And is getting down payment is also one of the KPIs that needs to happen before you book any firm order in SCS business?
Before we book an order, there needs to be a contract signed. So that's the most important criteria for booking an order. So all commercial terms are cleared, all legal terms are cleared, and there is a contract which is signed and then we can book it.
And is down payment also a KPI? Like do you need to have down payment before you book or that can come after you booking the order?
No. That comes after signing a contract, but we get a down payment normally before we start working on an order. So that's -- as you know, the beauty of the business, it's normally net working negative. This quarter looks slightly different as we spoke about the supply chain inefficiencies and the delayed booking of milestones. But in normal times, it's net working capital negative business.
Next question is from the line of Philippe Lorrain from Berenberg.
One question only for me to come back on Will's question on order intake guidance. Is there a specific reason besides your cautious stance and the fact that the visibility might be limited where you did not increase the order intake guidance for ITS. I mean kind of the upper end kind of implies about 10% year-on-year and quarter-on-quarter decline, which would appear quite strange versus the typical patterns we observed in the segment.
Yes, Philippe, I said before, so raising the guidance only then for 1 particular segment and 1 KPI, we wouldn't do that to KION.
Okay. That perhaps -- this impact gives also an indication perhaps on what to expect in terms of sales for next year already.
Yes, might be.
We have a follow-up question from the line of Katie Self from Morgan Stanley.
I just wanted to ask around SCS again. As you were talking about, obviously, the possibility of lumpy contracts going forward. Could you give us any indication on how the pipeline looks currently for SCS either into the next quarter or just generally over the next sort of 12 months? And secondly, given again we've hit a sort of huge record order intake, I'm curious how far do you think KION is through its required kind of capacity and headcount increase in SCS? Are you having to turn down any orders at this stage because you simply don't have the capacity yet to execute on them? Or is that not really a problem?
Well, we turn orders down all the time. And I don't mean that to be arrogant. There is a very rigorous process of when we bring orders to what conditions. And otherwise, we'd have 100% market share, which we know. So we do have, at this point, perhaps more ability to be selective than in the past. But the pipeline is very long and large and, let's say, very well filled. On the capacity situation, we have done an incredible amount. We've hired at the KION GROUP this year probably over 2,000 people so far year-to-date. And overall in the group, the biggest part of that is in SCS. We've upgraded our factories, but that's an ongoing, an ongoing investment that we will undertake in 2022 and '23 to make sure we do have enough capacity in the market. SCS in China will start to grow. So what we did for ITS will probably have to do in China. Our European activities have been upgraded significantly. The next place to look at is how we're doing in North America where that business has also expanded. So that will be -- one of the challenges is getting enough people and the capacities to keep up with the growth.
And Gordon, to add to the pipeline. So the pipeline is higher than -- the pipeline has been last year at the same point in time. So we are seeing an increase in the pipeline based on the customers' discussion we do have.
Next question is from the line of Denise Molina from Morningstar.
I have 2 questions, separate questions. First one is on -- Gordon, you mentioned fuel cells a couple of times in the call today. And I remember that there was a deal announced, I think with [ Car 4 ] earlier in the year to supply some fuel cell forklifts. Correct me if I'm wrong. But just wondering how that's going, if you've seen any momentum in terms of demand for fuel cells? And how much of that is of the order book currently? And then the second question was more on competition within SCS and around the material handling robots. It seems like a number of new players are starting to make acquisitions in that space. And I'm just wondering if you see any change in sort of the competitive landscape for you there?
Well, on the fuel cells, that's still a very small part of the business. We think there's a lot of promise that's why we have spent quite a bit of effort. And we do get orders every once in a while for this technology, especially if someone has hydrogen available in their site, which in a warehouse is much easier to do than in the passenger car type of industry. That is -- and we have full development program to be able to provide fuel cells, but it's still today a very minor part of our offering, but it will continue to grow because it does have quite a promise. On the SCS material handling or mobile robotics part of the business, we announced last year that our participation in Quicktron. We have massively invested in our own products. Now we have the cooperation on the LoadRunner. So you're right, this whole market of autonomous vehicles in a warehouse is continuing to grow. We are observing that very, very tightly to see if there are opportunities in that market. And should something arise, of course we will be one of the first to go after it. So it is a competitive market. Others are seeing it. But fact is the level of growth that we are seeing in this business and the nonavailability of labor to work in warehouses, those 2 things just lead to a higher demand for mobile robotics that will continue.
Next question is from the line of Jorge González Sadornil from Hauck & Aufhäuser Privatbankiers AG.
I have 2 questions on Supply Chain Solutions unit again. The first one is, if you think that the strong growth for the division is coming from the pent up demand from the -- basically if your clients are catching up with a strong increase in penetration from online sales? Or if you think that the megatrends are starting to kick in and some of your clients are basically investing, looking to the long run? And my second question is, if you can give us some detail on the percentage of return on customers that you have for these orders?
And I would look to the team on the second question, the percentage of returning customers. But the order level pent-up demand is certainly part of that. That's more last year. In the first quarter, what we're seeing now is more of a mega trend, especially in the automation of the food and beverage industry, so grocery business in general, which in some of the bigger suppliers around the world are not that automated in their supply chain and delivering the goods to their local stores in the small cities and micro fulfillment centers and all these types of things. So this whole mega trend of automating because of the increased competition and the nonavailability of labor, that's more based on a mega trend, and that is the bigger part of driving our growth. So it's not just pent-up demand as a result of the pandemic. Anke, go ahead.
Yes, I don't have a percentage for you with respect to return customers, but I can give you a couple of examples. If we look at what we call pure-play e-commerce customers, and we have revealed that we have 1 major customer who has more than 10% of group revenues, let's say, threshold under IFRS. This customer is a return customer. We have a quite long-standing partnership, I would say. And I would say that's especially relevant for the pure-play e-commerce segment. But also if we look into food and beverage, that's also a very strong vertical of the KION GROUP, that we have a -- grocery as well. So I would say it's a quite solid percentage within our portfolio of satisfied customers who are returning to us. We also see that customers are placing, for example, first orders in North America, then they are placing orders in Europe with us. And so it's also our global network which facilitates this.
We have a follow-up question from the line of Sven Weier from UBS.
It's just 1 on the next price increase that you also mentioned earlier, Anke. Was just wondering, now that you said that you got the peak headwind from raw material prices already in Q3 and I remember I think you said that the next price increase could be a little bit more than it usually was. Is that still the plan? Or are you going with the usual 1% to 2% this time around?
Yes, if I look at the headwinds for the full year and you know we said it's high double digit, that's still a substantial headwind. And going into 2022, we don't see that this will be somewhat significantly lower. So yes, we are discussing a more substantial price increase internally, but there is no decision taken yet. You know that we communicate that in December, and then it will be effective 1st of January.
And is that also because you're planning for more wage inflation than usual? Because at least for the German workforce I could imagine that this could be a topic next year?
Yes. But we still have a tariff agreement in place. So we will see how that then goes in the discussions with workers' councils. But yes, sure, if inflation goes up and so on, we also will have this discussion then. But it's predominantly the material cost increase which will underline our price increase.
Next question is from the line of Daniel Gleim from Stifel.
The first one would be on the European industrial truck market in 2022. How do you think about the market development into next year? What kind of environment are you preparing your organization for? And in case I push my luck too much at this point, any comments on current trading into October in absolute terms would be highly appreciated. That is my first question.
Yes. Let's start with October. We don't give somehow information on a monthly basis of what we have seen. Yes. So let's -- we're just coming out of Q3. So let's please leave it there. Let's see what we can tell you about October once we meet at the Capital Markets Day beginning of November. But October is not even over yet.
Yes. You always -- when you say preparing the organization for 2022 and so I mean we always prepare for the worst and hope for the best, that's kind of a good strategy in general. But the past year of 2021, if you look at the global numbers per quarter, plus 24, plus 24, plus 71, plus 73, plus 24. Those are pretty high comps. So I think we'll stay at a fairly high level in absolute terms. But what we do see -- what we do believe, we don't see it yet. What we do believe is that the market will normalize somewhat knowing that we have these mega trends toward automation. But these astounding 25% or even 50% year-to-year growth rates that we see now in -- 1, 2, 3, 4 -- 5 quarters, I don't believe that that will be in that range simply because the comps are much higher than they will have been now in this year.
All right, Gordon, maybe one clarification. When you're referring to the pipeline being higher than last year at the same point, that was specifically for SCS?
Correct.
And my second question would be on the upcoming Analyst Day. You already mentioned that maybe we can get some light on the October numbers. Is there anything else we should expect from that event that you can reveal today?
It will be a great event, of course. So it's worthwhile to join and to listen to us and to ask questions. Yes, what we have said is that we receive quite often questions about our midterm targets, and we have it on KION Group level. So we will give more insights into the 2 segments. What you can expect on the respective development. We have Hasan and Andreas leading the businesses. They will speak about the respective developments. We will speak about China. So I think we have a couple of interesting financial topics as well as operational and business market topic.
There are no further questions at this time. And I would like to hand back to Mr. Gordon Riske for closing comments. Please go ahead.
Yes. Again, thank you all for joining us today in this very exciting Q3 2021. And we look forward to hearing and seeing you in a virtual conference in November to dig a little bit deeper into all the great opportunities that lie ahead of us. And with that, we'd like to close this call.
Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has now concluded, and you may disconnect your telephone. Thank you for joining, and have a pleasant day. Goodbye.