B

BAWAG Group AG
VSE:BG

Watchlist Manager
BAWAG Group AG
VSE:BG
Watchlist
Price: 73.45 EUR 0.14% Market Closed
Market Cap: 5.8B EUR
Have any thoughts about
BAWAG Group AG?
Write Note

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2022-Q3

from 0
Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the BAWAG Group Q3 2022 Results Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded and a transcript thereof will be published on the company's website.

I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Anas Abuzaakouk, CEO. Please go ahead.

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone. I hope everyone is keeping well. I'm joined this morning by Enver, our CFO. Before we start with the summary of the third quarter operating results on Slide 2, let me address the City of Linz legal case. In August, the Austria Supreme Court ruled that the swap contract entered between BAWAG and the City of Linz almost 15 years ago was invalid. As a result of the ruling, we took a pretax write-off of EUR 254 million equal to EUR 190 million impact after tax related to the City of Linz receivable on the balance sheet. As the write-off was fully absorbed in regulatory capital in prior years, this will have no impact on our capital distribution plans for 2022. The write-off also resulted in a reduction of 40 basis points to our NPL ratio as the receivable is classified as an NPL in the past.

For the remainder of the presentation, all earnings will be presented on an adjusted basis excluding the City of Linz impact as this provides a more meaningful presentation of our operating performance as well as capital distributions. For the third quarter we delivered net profit of EUR 132 million, earnings per share of EUR 1.49 and a return on tangible common equity of 19%. The operating performance of our business was very strong with pre-provision profits of EUR 218 million and a cost-income ratio of 35%. Total risk costs were EUR 35 million inclusive of a EUR 12 million increase in our ECL management overlay bringing our management overlay to EUR 82 million despite sound credit performance and a record low NPL ratio of 1%. In terms of balance sheet and capital, average customer loans were flat quarter-over-quarter and up 9% year-over-year.

We are seeing a slowdown in loan growth as customers grow more cautious and deal with the impact of inflation, repricing of loans and uncertain economic environment. Customer loan growth will continue to be subdued in the quarters ahead and offset with the buildup in our securities portfolio as the widening of credit spreads provides for more attractive risk-adjusted returns. In terms of capital development, we generated approximately 60 basis points of gross capital during the quarter. Our CET1 ratio landed at 13% after deducting the year-to-date dividend accrual of EUR 207 million and the EUR 325 million share buyback program. Given the significant inflationary environment and rising interest rates, the bank is positively positioned for a rising rate environment with our retail deposit franchise. This will further add to our positive operating leverage and gradually materialize in the coming quarters.

With our strong operating performance during the first 3 quarters of the year and despite potential headwinds building up, we are on track to deliver on all 2022 targets; a profit before tax greater than EUR 675 million, a return on tangible common equity greater than 17% and a cost-income ratio under 38%. We plan to update our original 2025 target at year-end as well. In terms of our existing share buyback program of EUR 325 million, we have executed approximately 65% of the buyback and expect to have this completed by end of year. We will address any further capital distributions around year-end results based on market developments and subject to regulatory approvals. Above all else, we want to make sure we are prudent in our capital distribution plans, always maintaining our fortress balance sheet and ensure we have sufficient dry powder to address potential organic and inorganic opportunities in the coming quarters.

Market downturns and dislocations present unique opportunities if you have capital, liquidity and a fortress balance sheet with solid capital generation throughout all cycles. Given the headwinds we see building up from volatility in the energy markets, persistently high inflation, subdued consumer sentiment, prolonged geopolitical conflicts and the repricing of credit risk; we have added to our management overlay as we take a cautious and prudent approach to provisioning in the quarters ahead. Our ACL management overlay, which now stands at EUR 82 million, is equal to almost a full year of normal annual risk costs. We will look to continue and build this up in the fourth quarter as well given the volatility and uncertainty ahead. The management overlay is specifically intended to address any severe downturn and heightened volatility in the quarters ahead despite our very low NPL ratio of 1% and solid credit performance across the business to-date.

As I've stated in the past, our actions are borne out of an abundance of caution no different than how we reacted during the early days of the pandemic or more broadly the conservatism that underpins how we've run our business over the past decade. Moving to Slide 3. We delivered net profit of EUR 132 million, up 7% versus prior year. Overall, strong operating performance with operating income of EUR 336 million and total expenses of EUR 118 million, up 9% and down 2% respectively versus prior year. Pre-provision profits were EUR 218 million, up 17% versus prior year. Risk costs were EUR 35 million, up 64% versus prior year driven primarily by the buildup of our management overlay. Tangible book value per share was EUR 31.40, down 9% versus prior year and down 1% versus prior quarter. This captures the deduction of the year-to-date 2022 dividend accrual of EUR 207 million, the EUR 325 million share buyback and the EUR 190 million after-tax write-off related to the City of Linz receivable.

Moving on to Slide 4. At the end of the third quarter our CET1 ratio was 13%, up 30 basis points from 2Q with approximately EUR 150 million excess capital above our CET1 target of 12.25%. For the quarter we generated approximately 60 basis points of gross capital from earnings, which was offset by negative OCI movements of 10 basis points primarily driven by widening credit spreads and a positive impact of 10 basis points in regulatory capital stemming from the City of Linz write-off.

The dividend accrual for the quarter was equal to approximately 30 basis points. On a year-to-date basis we have generated 180 basis points of gross capital offset by growth in RWAs, which consumed about 50 basis points, and negative OCI hit of 50 basis points primarily from widening credit spreads and FX movements. Despite the overall volatility we are witnessing that can impact capital in many ways, we believe we are well positioned to address multiple market opportunities given our earnings, capital and funding base.

Our total capital distributions for the year reflect deducting the year-to-date 2022 dividend accrual of EUR 207 million, which reflects a payout ratio of 55% of adjusted net profits in 2022, the EUR 325 million in share buyback and the acquisition of a consumer loan portfolio earlier in the year. Net of all M&A and capital distributions, we landed at 13% CET1 ratio. Following our capital distribution framework, our primary focus is to deploy our capital into organic growth and value enhancing M&A.

We currently see several potential organic and inorganic opportunities that we will be assessing over the coming quarters. On Slide 5, our Retail & SME business delivered net profit of EUR 111 million, up 17% versus prior year and generating a very strong return on tangible common equity of 33% and a cost-income ratio of 33%. Average assets for the quarter were EUR 22.5 billion, up 9% versus prior year and 2% versus prior quarter.

Average customer deposits were EUR 27.8 billion, up 3% versus prior year and down 1% versus prior quarter. RWAs in the segment were EUR 9.5 billion, up 18% versus prior year and 1% versus prior quarter. Pre-provision profits were EUR 172 million, up 21% compared to the prior year with operating income up 12% and operating expenses down 2% resulting from prior year operational initiatives with a continued focus on driving synergies across our various channels and products.

Risk costs were EUR 23 million, up 51% versus prior year driven by an incremental EUR 6 million booking of the management overlay. The underlying core retail cost run rate is at EUR 17 million per quarter with the addition of the acquired consumer loan portfolio at the end of the second quarter. The trend in asset quality continues to hold across our customer base with a stable low NPL ratio of 1.9%.

Across the business, we will remain prudent and cautious as we've tightened our credit box given the increasing headwinds. We also continue to maintain our pricing discipline as we focus on risk-adjusted returns and price against movement in swap rates across the curve. We expect continued earnings growth across the Retail & SME franchise for the remainder of 2022 and going into 2023. However, we see subdued loan growth in the quarters ahead given overall cautious consumer sentiment, impacts of inflation on daily spending and a wait and see approach to new investments as well as the repricing of credit.

On Slide 6, our Corporate, Real Estate & Public Sector business delivered net profit of EUR 35 million, down 12% versus the prior year due to the booking of incremental management overlay, but still generating a strong return on tangible common equity of 16% and a cost-income ratio of 23%.

Average assets for the quarter were EUR 15.5 billion, up 10% versus prior year and down 2% versus prior quarter. Pre-provision profits were EUR 60 million, down 2% compared to the prior year. However, core revenues were up 6%. Risk costs were EUR 11 million, up 93% versus prior year driven by the incremental EUR 6 million booking of the management overlay. The trend in asset quality continues to be solid with our NPL ratio of 70 basis points, down 30 basis points versus prior year and flat versus prior quarter.

We continue to see diversified lending opportunities with a solid pipeline in commitments that we expect to fund in the coming months. We will continue to maintain our disciplined underwriting, focus on risk-adjusted returns and avoid blindly chasing volume growth. As the markets reprice credit risk, which we believe was long overdue, we have further tightened our credit box and adjusted our risk return criteria given the uncertainty ahead and reflecting our disciplined approach to lending.

With that, I'll hand over to Enver.

E
Enver Sirucic
executive

Thank you, Anas. I'll continue on Slide 8. Solid operating performance in the third quarter with core revenues up 2% versus prior quarter, with net interest income being up 4% with first impacts from higher interest rates and net commission income down 4% due to overall market environment and a slowdown in the advisory business. Operating expenses remained stable at EUR 118 million and our cost-income ratio landed at around 35% for the quarter.

Total risk costs were EUR 35 million inclusive of a EUR 12 million increase in our ECL management overlay bringing it to EUR 82 million, which equals almost a full year of normal annual risk costs. On Slide 9, key developments of our balance sheet. Average interest-bearing assets and risk-weighted assets remained at the same levels as in Q2. Customer deposits were slightly up while we increased our own issues by more than 11% through issuing EUR 1.25 billion covered bond and CHF125 million senior preferred note in Q3.

CET1 capital and the CET1 ratio improved by 2% and 30 basis points, respectively, mainly coming from solid earnings generation post the dividend accrual. On Slide 10, core revenues. Stronger net interest income up 4% versus second quarter. Net interest margin improved to 231 basis points for the quarter driven by mainly increasing interest rates. Our interest rate sensitivity remains unchanged with 200 basis points increase in overnight rates and 3-month Euribor leading to approximately EUR 200 million increase in net interest income per year.

Given the re-fixing structure of our assets, it takes around 4 to 5 months to see the full effect of a rate increase reflected in our run rate, which means that the NII improvement will gradually materialize in the coming quarters. As mentioned before, net commission income was down 4% as we see a slowdown in our advisory business given the uncertainty and volatile market environment, which is likely to continue for the rest of the year.

Having said that, we have a positive view on core revenues for the rest of the year. That is why we again updated our outlook from previously over 7% core revenue growth to around 9% growth in 2022. Moving on to Slide 11. We continue to maintain operating expenses at stable levels despite significant headwinds. Cost-income ratio continued to improve and stands now at 35% for the quarter, which is well ahead of our 2022 target of below 38%. We'll also continue to focus on our absolute cost-out target and we are confident to achieve a net cost-out of around 2% in 2022.

Slide 12, risk costs. Overall unchanged conservative prudent approach on provisioning with stable underlying trends and strong asset quality with an NPL ratio of 1%. The underlying core retail risk cost run rate is around EUR 17 million per quarter including the portfolio acquisition in the second quarter and the total risk cost ratio is around 20 basis points.

We added EUR 12 million to our ECL management overlay, which now stands at EUR 82 million and is equal to almost a full year of normal risk costs. For the rest of the year, we expect a stable underlying risk cost ratio of around 20 basis points. In addition, we'll look to continue and build up the management overlay in the fourth quarter. And on Slide 13, so we are confirming our 2022 outlook. With our strong operating performance during the first 3 quarters of the year, we are on track to deliver all 2022 targets; a profit before tax of greater than EUR 675 million, a return on tangible common equity of greater than 17% and a cost-income ratio of below 38%. As mentioned earlier, we have again upgraded our core revenue growth outlook from previously greater than 7% to around 9%. Everything else remains unchanged.

And with that, operator, let's open up the call for questions. Thank you.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Máté Nemes from UBS.

M
Mate Nemes
analyst

I have a few questions, please. The first one is on corporate loans. It seems like corporate exposures declined by 4% sequentially. I'm just wondering if you could share any sentiment, any commentary on what's been driving this. Is it about a lower risk appetite on your side or is it that risk-adjusted returns are not necessarily meeting your hurdle rates or is it simply just a matter of timing and we could see perhaps an increase or better performance towards the end of the year?

The second question is on management overlays. Could you perhaps discuss how you assessed the portfolio in Q3 that resulted in the EUR 12 million of additional overlay and what shall we expect in the next few quarters? Should we expect similar top-ups as long as there's no market improvement in the macro environment? And then the last question would be on TLTRO and the investment of excess liquidity. How do you think about your TLTRO balances and potential repayments in case the ECB indeed changes the terms or the pricing of TLTRO and what could that mean for reallocation of liquidity perhaps to secure this portfolio or other means?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Mate, all good questions. I'll take the corporate loans and the management overlay and then Enver, you want to address the TLTRO. Actually Mate, on the corporate loans, really nothing to read into it. Just kind of subdued demand in terms of at least how we price loans and just the decline that you see kind of sequentially quarter-over-quarter, that's just the maturities. But the pipeline in kind of traditional corporate lending is still pretty I think challenging.

We are seeing, I think, more firm pricing in some of the indications, but you should assume it's pretty static. There's not going to be -- when we talk about kind of a diversified opportunity or pipeline, it's more I think in the real estate and the public sector side. The traditional corporates I think is more idiosyncratic, but we'll see. I think that's pretty fluid. But at least from what we see today, it's going to be pretty static.

In terms of the management overlay so we're at EUR 82 million, that's almost 51%, I guess, of the total ECL. I would leave you with a few comments. The first is if you take our ECL of EUR 160 million of which 50% is the overlay and you compare that to the asset quality pre-pandemic, you see an improved overall asset quality and I think it's best reflected in the NPL ratio, which I think it's now at a record low of 1%, as well as if you look at the staging in terms of Stage 1, 2 and 3 and that's probably at a steady state and we don't see any deterioration there.

I think your question is what goes into the actual assumptions, we can break that out at year-end in terms of the formula. But I would tell you when we look at the severe scenario in kind of calculating our overlay, our severe assumption is more severe than the ECB severe scenario for the euro area as well as obviously the IMF is less severe than the ECB assumption.

So we tend to be pretty conservative in the assumptions that we put in to get us to our overlay to be able to build that up and we'll continue to build that up in the fourth quarter. I think we updated our core revenue guidance. I think what you should kind of take from that is we will continue if third quarter is a good proxy probably for the fourth quarter in terms of what we'll look to build up in the overlay. And again, we're just being prudent and cautious. We'll see what happens in '23. Hopefully, at least from what we see today, nothing is -- we don't see any concerns or impacts in our book, but we just want to act out of an abundance of caution as we go into '23 and beyond. Do you want to take the TLTRO?

E
Enver Sirucic
executive

On the third question, Mate. So on the TLTRO, it very much depends what the ECB will announce by end of the month. But asking about the asset side so the excess liquidity what we are thinking is redeploying in shorter-term assets mainly on the security side. They've been quite underinvested there. So if you think after redeeming the TLTRO in such a situation, we're left with EUR 3 billion to EUR 4 billion of excess cash for the ECB. That's something that we are already proactively looking into. And as I said, that will be mainly in high quality securities very likely.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Gabor Kemeny from Autonomous Research.

G
Gabor Kemeny
analyst

A couple of questions from me. First one is on the euro rate sensitivity where you have a useful guidance. Can you give us a sense of the impact of higher euro rates on your Q3 NII? I mean if you could help us quantify the benefit you have from rising euro rates and if you could give us a sense of what is a reasonable assumption for the rate rise benefit in the fourth quarter. As I understand, it takes a few months to reprice at higher interest rates. And the other question would be how do you see your M&A pipeline?

And you talked about slowing loan growth, tighter credit underwriting. I wonder to what extent does this incentivize you to pursue inorganic growth opportunities. And perhaps in relation to that, where does the execution of the EUR 100 million share buyback -- the second tranche of the share buyback currently sit in your packing order?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Do you want to take the sensitivity?

E
Enver Sirucic
executive

Yes, sure. So I think, Gabor, for Q3 it's quite simple. I would take the EUR 10 million increase of NII and I would mostly put it under interest rate sensitivity. For Q4 we don't provide single line item guidance, but what we tried is by updating core revenue growth target from 7% to 9%, that should give you some guidance what we expect for the NII in Q4.

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

And then Gabor, on the M&A, let me first address. Irrespective of what happens with the customer loan growth, whether it's at a high velocity growth or it's subdued, that does not -- that's mutually exclusive from how we look at M&A. So we'll never do a deal because one part of the business is slowing down or we're cautious. We look at each deal on a mutually exclusive basis and it has to hit our risk-adjusted return criteria, I think we've laid that out before in terms of returns. And look, the reality of the environment is we're much more cautious on the overall environment. We've tightened our credit box on our own lending quite a bit from the pandemic and we added to that earlier this year. So any deal that we do would have to really meet a lot of thresholds in terms of our conservatism.

In the asset classes we're pretty judicious, very selective on what works and what doesn't. And the reality is anything we price will have to be reflective -- if we do a deal, right, would have to be reflective of the environment we think potentially could materialize in the next 6, 12, 18 months with all the headwinds building up. And I think a good proxy of how we approach things was the consumer loan portfolio that we purchased in the second quarter. That's the type of conservatism that we would probably be applying. But as I mentioned during the call when we were going through the results, market dislocations and downturns do provide unique opportunities. If you have capital, if you have a healthy return profile, if you're generating, if you have a strong funding base and I think we have that going into whatever might materialize.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Johannes Thormann from HSBC.

J
Johannes Thormann
analyst

Johannes here. 3 questions from my side, please. First of all, regarding the management overlay. We don't know how long this crisis lasts, but is there any target volume? And probably looking at portfolio, what are the areas of special concern where you say this is the most -- if bad things happen, this is the most likely outcome where we would use this management overlay? Secondly, on your corporate loans pricing, where do you think you differ from competition because other European banks are still talking about healthy demand. Is your pricing so much different? And last, but not least, just on the tax rate for this year, where do you expect this to be after the one-off in the quarter?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Johannes, all good questions as well. On the overlay I would say look, this second quarter we booked EUR 6 million, we then booked EUR 12 million in the third quarter. That's probably a good proxy looking at the fourth quarter. We don't have a target volume. I will tell you this, we intend and we have very good line of sight into delivering on our financial targets a return on tangible common equity over 17%. That's what we've said throughout not just 2022, but obviously going into years ahead of us. So whatever we do on the overlay, it doesn't compromise kind of our returns. So I think that's one way of looking at it and we're just being overly cautious.

Your question about where do we see the potential risk, I've always said this or Enver has always said this as well. It's the unsecured portfolio. It's your consumer loans, Austria, Germany, right? That's the bulk of our consumer loans. In any downturn where you have unemployment -- kind of a GDP downturn leading or translating into higher unemployment, you'll have impacts on your unsecured.

That's the one area. But look, I think our underwriting in that respect, how we look at risk-adjusted returns, we've been pretty disciplined over the years. I think we have a good sense of how the book would materialize. And the overlay is just again out of an abundance of caution like we did in the pandemic and we intend to be able to achieve or hit all of our targets irrespective of what we do on the risk side.

On the corporate side, look, our risk-adjusted pricing is different from competitors, not to comment on what other people are doing. And I think also the price is one thing, Johannes, but also covenants and how we underwrite is also a factor. It's not always price. So we've been pretty disciplined over the years. The impact of that is more subdued loan growth, but we're okay with that. We look at each individual loan on kind of an ROE basis and we try to price and think about risk throughout all cycles not just any one particular point in time.

E
Enver Sirucic
executive

Yes, tax rate is simple. 25% I think is a good proxy for full year tax rate.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Mehmet Sevim from JPMorgan.

M
Mehmet Sevim
analyst

I have just a couple follow-up questions, please. So first of all, can I please follow up on your NII sensitivities beyond the 200 basis points level of guidance? Could you please help us understand maybe qualitatively what trends you'd expect to see in terms of deposit betas and other funding costs, but also asset repricing once say rates reach a 2% level and beyond that?

And my second question would be on the deployment of your excess cash position in securities as you highlighted and mentioned before. Is that something that we can expect will become visible in your balance sheet soon or is that for example depend on potential changes to remuneration by the ECB or are you actually planning to start with that really soon? These would be my follow-ups.

E
Enver Sirucic
executive

On the deposit betas, well, the current assumption is I would say around 40% deposit beta that we find interest rate activity. What we put in the presentation is new information on the re-fixing schedule so it takes a bit of time to get the full benefit reflected, which you said takes 4 to 5 months. We also gave a bit the structural measure on our deposits, which is most of it is still kind of overnight, right? So what we would expect once rates go over 200 basis points that there will be a gradual increase in the deposit betas. So what we are observing right now, we are definitely below the 40% expectation, the 200 basis points expects 40% and then after that, we would see a gradual increase of that.

And we just also want to wait for the -- kind of the second question that you had. We also want to wait for the ECB to see what the outcome of that is because that impacts our overall balance sheet position and we would then give an update on that measure by year-end, which I think is more meaningful. On the securities, yes, we already started deploying more cash into securities, but not to the full scale and it will definitely depend on what ECB decides on the remuneration if you increase that or not.

M
Mehmet Sevim
analyst

Okay, great. And maybe one final question, more general in terms of the balance sheet and growth trends. Clearly trends have slowed down this quarter and it was a lot faster in the second quarter and I appreciate you always look at risk-adjusted returns and pivot the balance sheet accordingly. But if we were to assume that things stay as they are now or even maybe get worse, how should we expect the balance sheet composition to change say over 2023 if everything stays the same by the end of next year?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

I think things will be pretty static. When you think about subdued loan growth and I mentioned that on the retail side, that will be a couple of quarters. That's not just 1 quarter because you can see just the overall pipeline, how things are -- how you're pricing versus where the market's pricing. But I think it will be fairly static and I think proportional in terms of retail versus nonretail business.

The one thing that will probably continue to grow as a percentage of your balance sheet will be your securities portfolio. And I think the third quarter if you kind of look at the development, Mehmet, that's probably a good proxy. It's kind of the pace that we're looking in the securities investments where we do see good opportunities, but I think it's fairly static. It's not going to impact our returns or results. I think we feel fairly confident in the different areas, they'll be able to deliver in '23 and beyond.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Magdalena Stoklosa from Morgan Stanley.

M
Magdalena Stoklosa
analyst

I've got a couple of questions really. One is around costs and inflation and another one on the real estate portfolio. So let me maybe start with the real estate side. So you've actually grown your loans in the quarter so could you give us a sense what sort of opportunities were out there for you to grow the portfolio? And the second just for us, can you just remind us of the kind of the geographical mix of that portfolio kind of by sector and by let's just say LTDs so that we kind of have a sense of how to look at it in more detail?

And question number two really is on your cost because you run this extraordinary cost-income ratio with also extraordinary targets. But of course we're also operating at these every month heightened kind of inflationary times and seriously it may last for a little bit longer. So as you look into 2023, how do you assess that inflationary pressure versus your kind of more structural savings that you already kind of have in mind for the next let's just say 2 years?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Magdalena, all great questions. Let me start maybe then with the OpEx or the cost and then we'll address the real estate. So on the cost, just to remind everyone, our level of confidence in terms of delivering the 2% net cost up for 2022 as an example. We have that confidence because typically it's a 12- to 18-month lead time to be able to really understand your cost base for that current year. So a lot of the tailwinds or kind of the positive cost developments were borne out of the fact that initiatives that we took during the pandemic as well as in 2021, which gave us line of sight in terms of the overall cost base.

More importantly and I think the topic that you're addressing is the impact of the significant inflationary development and it hits you in a lot of different ways. You have the wage inflation that will be part of the collective bargaining agreement next year and that's something that we're working through and factoring in.

And then you have inflation with a lot of your non-personnel costs what we call your G&A, which is tied to technology contracts or leases, I mean everywhere that kind of has a CPI linked to it and those are all things that people should consider in their overall cost base. So those are pretty major headwinds. But we're working through all of that and we'll give an update at year-end in terms of what the cost outlook is. But rest assured, Magdalena, this is something that we've been focused on from 2021 in terms of the overall cost development.

We saw some of the inflationary pressures at the tail end of last year. So there were things that we were able to do that I think will provide a positive lift. But I think we'll have more clarity at year-end. But you should see pretty consistent development on the cost base going into '23 despite all of the points that I just made in terms of the inflationary headwinds that we're seeing and that is one of the things that we pride ourselves on that we can truly control.

But you do need a lead time, you need to have a viewpoint as to how things are developing and I think that's something that we've done I think a decent job of. On the real estate exposure, I'd say we can come back to on the split I think of the different underlying asset classes. But what we're seeing is primarily multifamily lending as far as an underlying asset class.

On Page 17, we have a split of the overall real estate portfolio of EUR 6.6 billion. But where we see opportunities is kind of multifamily. What we've done is we've adjusted our credit box or tightened our credit box in terms of advance rates, debt yields and the like. So we've been pretty conservative prior to 2022 and I think we've tightened our credit box further and we have a different threshold on risk-adjusted returns. So these are pretty idiosyncratic opportunities mix of U.S. versus Western Europe, but we feel pretty good about the loans that we're putting on at this moment. So Page 17 has I think the split of the EUR 6.6 billion.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Simon Nellis from Citibank.

S
Simon Nellis
analyst

A quick question. If you could give an update on the Peak Bancorp transaction, how that's progressing? And then just maybe generally, you have EUR 150 million of excess capital above your core Tier 1 ratio. Come year-end what should we expect? Are you going to do another buyback, maybe a special, what's the plan there?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Capital distributions, you're right, we have EUR 150 million as of 3Q. We'll wait till end of the year. Just I think we'll have greater line of sight and clarity as to how things are developing and then we'll update on overall capital distribution plans going into '23. On the U.S. acquisition, I think in the next quarter or 2 quarters hopefully, but the process is going well. I think we have guided probably first quarter probably more likely, but we'll see. There is the issue it's a foreign process.

S
Simon Nellis
analyst

And just on the buyback for next year, I think you were planning EUR 100 million. When do you think you might apply for that?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

So Simon, we just want to wait till year-end to see how things develop in the market and then obviously we'll give you guys an update with the year-end results in terms of updated capital distribution plans inclusive of buybacks, special dividends and the like plus seeing kind of what we see happen in fourth quarter as far as inorganic opportunities.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Tobias Lukesch from Kepler Cheuvreux.

T
Tobias Lukesch
analyst

I would like to touch again on the commercial real estate portfolio. You just outlined a bit of your rationale also with regards to potential focus on multifamily business. Maybe you could again give us a bit of a flavor with regards to your geographical focus. Like where are the countries where you potentially do see most opportunities? And in general I mean given that the real estate sector has been quite under pressure, assessing your portfolio, would you think that there might be some rating migration likely in 2023? Second question would be on the retail side on the housing business here. We have especially seen price changes in the Netherlands, your recent focus basically.

I was just wondering if you see a particular country which would be potentially most opportunistic for the next 1 or 2 years for you to target. And finally, I mean I appreciate your comment on the capital distribution and I think you just mentioned that with regards to a special dividend. I was just wondering like if there would be a consideration or a chance that we might see a payout ratio increase if there was potentially the reasoning that you do not go for EUR 100 million share buyback because this would have -- or would need an approval by the ECB, but rather increase the payout ratio and basically pay this out of adjusted net profits basically.

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Tobias, good questions. Let me start with the capital distribution. Like I mentioned earlier, we'll wait till year-end and I think we'll give you guys more clear picture because there's just a lot of developments that happen in the fourth quarter organically, inorganically in particular and then I think we'll have better perspective as to what we can commit to. So just sorry on that one, you have to wait till year end. As far as the real estate, maybe I'll start with the mortgages or the housing loans. We actually added a page, which hopefully provides some greater color on the overall portfolio on Slide 16 just in terms of the composition of the housing loans.

But I think your question was where do we see opportunities? I will tell you across the different geographies; whether Austria, Germany, the Netherlands; where we repriced against the swap rates and maintained a certain margin, I think we are probably earlier to the game on that than others and that obviously impacts demand.

But you also have just a subdued demand as a whole in addition to the fact that we reprice probably sooner and try to maintain that margin. So that will impact the volumes. In terms of asset quality, we feel pretty good about the portfolio just in terms of fixed versus floating. Ours is predominantly a fixed rate portfolio as we swap out the interest rate risk.

Our LTVs on the whole portfolio is approximately 60%. It's been pre-seasoned. So we feel pretty good about the overall portfolio, but demand is subdued across all of the geographies and that's what I mentioned earlier about kind of a static view. And then the commercial real estate, it's more U.S., Western Europe, less Continental Europe as far as the opportunities and I think the slide that we have provides a good breakout. But we have tightened our credit box and adjusted pricing given just the unknowns and the headwinds that potentially could develop.

T
Tobias Lukesch
analyst

And with regards to a potential I mean stress you'd see with regards to rating migration, is there something you could envisage for '23 already or do you think that the changes we have seen in the commercial real estate sector especially like do not indicate anything on the negative?

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

I would say so that's one of the reasons we build up the overlay, Tobias, right, EUR 80 million probably going to EUR 100 million, whatever the number is. But more importantly if you look at the IFRS kind of the staging, we're at pre-pandemic levels. I think that's a good proxy that you have on Page 15. If it shifts slightly, I don't think it's going to be -- on what we see today, credit performance is pretty robust. But again we are just acting very conservatively and being really prudent. We hope for the best obviously, but prepare for the worst and that's typically how we run the business. So I hope that helps.

Operator

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time so I'll hand the call back for closing remarks.

A
Anas Abuzaakouk
executive

Thank you, operator. Thanks, everybody, for joining our 3Q call. Look forward to catching up with you at year-end results. Take care. All the best. Bye.

Operator

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Speakers, please stand by.