BAWAG Group AG
VSE:BG
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
45.64
74.15
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning, everyone. Hope everyone's doing well. I'm joined this morning by Enver Sirucic, our CFO.
Let's jump right into it on Slide 3. We delivered very strong results during the third quarter with profit before tax of EUR 160 million. This is actually up 24% versus the prior year. Net income is up 27% versus the prior year at EUR 125 million, a return on tangible equity of 20.2%. This is when we apply a 12% CET1 ratio and earnings per share for the quarter of EUR 1.22.
We also generated 10 basis points of CET1, landing at around 10 -- 15.3% fully loaded CET1 ratio, and this is net of the capital actions that we took during the third quarter. On a year-to-date basis, profit before tax was EUR 429 million. This is up 14% versus prior year, generating 16.8% return on tangible equity, again, when we apply a 12% CET1 ratio to adjust for excess capital levels.
Given the strong performance over the first 3 quarters, we're on track to exceed all of our 2018 targets. As far as executing on our operational road map, we continue to make really good progress across the board and have good momentum as we look to close out the remaining of the year.
On Concept 21, the separation from the Austrian Post is on track as it relates to customer migrations, branch transitions and hiring of advisers. We've completed 85% of the branch transition and migrated 55% of the impacted customers to-date with a retention ratio of over 95%. We've also added another retail partnership during the third quarter, providing new customer-acquisition channels to offer a full scope of retail banking products.
The SĂĽdwestbank restructuring is ahead of plan, and we've planted the seeds for growth in 2019, expanding our retail and SME offering and leveraging new distribution channels across Germany. We also closed the Deutscher Ring Bausparkasse acquisition in the third quarter. Mind you, this is our first German M&A bolt-on acquisition, and this will complement our German mortgage channel.
As far as business development, we saw favorable trends during the third quarter. However, we continued to stay patient and disciplined, focusing on risk-adjusted returns versus absolute volumes.
Overall, we've had year-to-date new business originations of EUR 4.7 billion. This is up 28% versus prior year and primarily driven by our core retail product growth as well as our International lending business.
Our overall strong capital position and generation provides us with a number of opportunities as we focus on organic growth across our multiple business lines. On the M&A front, we are evaluating a number of opportunities. However, we will only pursue deals if they are the right strategic fit, come at the right value, are earnings accretive and generating returns consistent with our return on tangible equity group targets.
We're absolutely committed to total shareholder return and being good stewards of capital. In the event we are unable to deploy our capital to organic and/or inorganic opportunities that generate returns greater than 15%, we are committed to returning capital to shareholders through dividends and stock buybacks.
Okay, moving on to Slide 4. We've outlined the quarterly financial development and per-share performance metric -- performance metrics. Third quarter profit before tax came in at EUR 160 million, up 5% versus the prior quarter. This was driven by higher NII and other income, staying disciplined on cost by keeping expenses almost flat and maintaining low-risk costs.
The third quarter earnings per share increased by 7% to EUR 1.22. Intangible book value per share increased 3% to EUR 31.90. Core revenues were up 2%, driven by NII growth of 5% and NIM increase of 13 basis points. This was mainly driven by balance sheet optimization measures and converting our strong pipeline in the International lending business, which we have alluded to in prior quarters.
NCI was seasonally lower, as anticipated, which is in line with prior years. Overall, operating expenses were up 1% versus the second quarter. This takes into account the acquisition of Deutscher Ring Bausparkasse and the increase in our branch network. However, the overall cost-income ratio decreased 1.5 points to 42.4%. The risk-cost ratio was 12 basis points, and the NPL ratio decreased 10 basis points to 1.7%. The low-risk costs for the quarter reflect the ongoing benign credit environment we're experiencing, solid asset quality in the stable developed markets that we continue to operate in.
On Slide 5, the customer business development has been led by BAWAG P.S.K., easygroup and our International lending Business. The BAWAG P.S.K. retail segment continues to deliver core net asset growth with EUR 900 million of originations year-to-date. We're really focused here on consumer and housing loans. And this is offsetting the proactive runoff of our Swiss franc mortgages. Our focus is on delivering on Concept 21.
Additionally, we've been growing partnerships in our digital platforms to augment our existing retail distribution channels. At easygroup, our year-to-date performance has been very solid as the organic and inorganic growth from easybank, easyleasing and Bausparkasse are replacing the runoff of our international mortgages. We're also positioned for the launch of Qlick, which is our digital German brand, during the fourth quarter, which will drive consumer loan growth in Germany.
Our International lending Business segment had another solid quarter with strong originations in year-to-date net asset growth of 9% while maintaining a disciplined approach to underwriting and focusing on risk-adjusted returns. As far as the DACH Corporates & Public Sector business, pricing remains challenging, and we continue to focus on risk-adjusted returns versus just driving volume.
At SĂĽdwestbank, we're building on the early momentum from our transformation road map. The primary focus here to-date has been really on the operational restructuring. However, we've already planted the seeds for 2019 as we expand our product and channel offering across Germany.
Overall, we feel very good about the customer business development during the first 9 months of the year. Growing in our core retail products, continuing to shift of our customer franchise to retail and SME and executing on various operational initiatives, be it the SĂĽdwestbank restructuring or the BAWAG P.S.K, Concept 21 network transformation. We also believe focusing on risk-adjusted returns, not chasing volume, and staying patient and disciplined in deploying our liquidity and capital will serve us well over the long haul.
Okay. I'm on Slide 6 now. The BAWAG P.S.K segment has another strong quarter. As it relates to financials, third quarter profit before tax came in at EUR 60 million. This is up 24% versus prior year. Year-to-date profit before tax came in at EUR 177 million, up 17% versus prior year with a cost-income ratio of 44.5%. The business continued its trend of driving positive operating leverage. This is really best demonstrated through the reduction in cost on a year-to-date basis of 8% while growing our operating income by 5%.
As far as business development, new business asset originations of EUR 300 million during the quarter were driven by consumer and housing loans. Year-to-date, we've had core net asset growth of 3% in consumer and euro housing loans, which is offset by a proactive reduction of Swiss franc housing loans, which are down 5% year-to-date.
In terms of operational and strategic developments, we also signed a strategic partnership with Metro Cash & Carry, which is the leading SME retailer in Austria, on the heels of the partnership we signed with MediaMarktSaturn Austria in the second quarter. This will allow us to provide current account products and credit cards for entrepreneurs as well as SMEs. The collaboration will allow us also to provide tailored financial products and services to their more than 500,000 customers. So we're really excited about this partnership.
On Slide 7, we wanted to provide a more detailed update of Concept 21. Again, this is our retail network transformation. Concept 21 has been in the works for quite some time. The separation agreement from the Austrian Post we signed earlier this year provided us with a chance to accelerate our retail transformation plans and work towards our preferred stand-alone network.
The opportunity set for us was compelling and was really a chance to, a, enhance the overall customer experience; b, reduce inefficiencies within a network; c, invest in a digitally integrated omnichannel distribution; and d, maintain our high-touch advisory, which is really, at the end of the day, what our customers want and expect from us.
The target network we communicated is up to 100 branches, and this will cover over 85% of the Austrian population, over 92% of our existing customer base will be comprised of 74 high-performing branches that are, today, leased or owned by BAWAG and that will be augmented with an additional 26 new branches.
The execution of the Concept 21 road map has actually been going very well. To-date, we've completed 85% of the branch transition, shifted over 55% of our 420,000 customers that are impacted in our target network. It's also important to understand and note that approximately 70% of the customers or about 1 million customers are not impacted by the branch transition.
We've maintained the customer retention rate on the transition customers of over 95%, which is consistent with past migrations. Over 50% of our newly planned branches have been signed with the opening of our first stand-alone branch that took place in October, and there has been really no significant complaint activity. Ultimately, Concept 21 provides us with client-focused advisory centers, self-service enhancements and improved customer service workflows integrated with our digital platforms, and this is really the transformation of the future for us.
On Slide 8, easygroup had another solid quarter. On the financials, third quarter profit before tax came in at EUR 35 million, up 20% versus the prior year. Year-to-date profit before tax came in at EUR 106 million, up 1% versus prior year with a cost-income ratio of around 32%.
As far as business development, new business originations of EUR 200 million during the quarter were primarily driven by auto leasing. We've continued to see steady growth in our core products, which are up 3% year-to-date. Overall, customer loans were flat since year-end as we absorbed Deutscher Ring Bausparkasse. This had assets of about EUR 400 million, and this was offsetting, in large part, the anticipated runoff of our international mortgage portfolios, which are down approximately 15% year-to-date, in line with what we've guided historically.
Moving on to Slide 8 (sic) [ Slide 9 ] and the nonretail segments. The International lending business delivered a strong quarter with profit before tax of approximately EUR 30 million. This is up 11% versus the prior year. Year-to-date profit before tax came in at EUR 88 million, up 45% versus prior year, driven by the release of provisions from the sale of a nonperforming loan in the second quarter. Asset quality remains high with an NPL ratio of 20 basis points.
Overall new business origination of approximately EUR 1.4 billion during the third quarter helped drive net asset growth of 10% from the prior quarter. Additionally, we have a solid pipeline in the fourth quarter that we hope to execute on.
The DACH Corporates & Public Sector segment delivered profit before tax of approximately EUR 11 million during the third quarter. This is a decrease of 44% from the prior year. Year-to-date profit before tax came in at EUR 33 million, down 39% from the prior year, and reality from our perspective, the DACH corporate lending market continues to be challenging as it relates to price and risk-adjusted returns. However, we will continue to be patient and disciplined, focusing on risk-adjusted returns versus purely pursuing volume growth.
On Slide 9 (sic) [ Slide 10 ], our focus on SĂĽdwestbank continues to be on the transformation and repositioning of the business. SĂĽdwestbank delivered second quarter profit before -- third quarter profit before tax of approximately EUR 13 million and year-to-date profit before tax of approximately EUR 33 million. There are no comparison to prior years given the acquisition closed in December 2017.
Overall, revenue development has been in line with our expectations as part of the capital efficiency review taking place, and the financial benefits of the cost restructuring will continue into the fourth quarter with the full benefit being realized in 2019. The core revenue development is in line with our capital efficiency measures taking place as we scale back low-margin, high-risk weighted and low returning business that do not meet our targeted risk-adjusted returns.
From an operational standpoint, the third quarter was the continuation of the transformation efforts launched at the beginning of the year. The key focus from a product and a channel standpoint will be augmenting our retail and SME products in channels, which were accelerated with the closing of Deutsche Ring Basparkasse on the housing loan front, using Qlick as an integrated German consumer loan product, leveraging Spotcap technology to address parts of the German SME market and leveraging PayLife for the issuance of credit cards.
Moving on to Slide 10 (sic) [ Slide 11 ], we wanted to provide more detail on the integration efforts in Germany and focus on the operational transformation at SĂĽdwestbank and Deutsche Ring Basparkasse. Specifically, we wanted to highlight the work that has been done to-date and provide details around restructuring and projected cost-downs. The transformation plan covers cost restructuring, product profitability reviews, process improvements across the middle and back-office, and identifying ways to leverage the broader group infrastructure.
In terms of personnel at SĂĽdwestbank, we project the total FTE reduction of around 40% versus year-end 2017. To enable the restructuring, we implemented a social plan that was agreed with the worker's council earlier this year in April. The social plan consists of 2 phases, split between Phase 1 in 2018 and Phase 2 in 2019. We've already completed the first phase and are in the process of accelerating Phase 2 of the restructuring to focus the team on a number of growth initiatives going forward.
In addition to SĂĽdwestbank personnel restructuring plan, we also agreed on an optimized branch network and nonpersonnel cost-out, reflecting both the overall business needs and digital priorities. Our day 1 network consisted of 28 total branches. The social plan settled on a total of 16 branches, so it's a reduction of around 40%, which will -- we believe will preserve both regional coverage and core product services. At the end of the third quarter, we had completed 100% of the branch closures that we had targeted.
With Deutsche Ring Bausparkasse, which is a building society bank with 85,000 customers, approximately EUR 0.5 billion of assets and 100 employees, this really represents our first bolt-on acquisition in Germany. The business provides a new mortgage product and channel for our German platform.
We closed the transaction in September and agreed upon a social plan with the worker's council just last week. Our goal is to complete the restructuring and integration by the first half of 2019. But to date, we've made very good progress with the German integrations and expect a strong momentum to continue for the next 6 to 12 months. The cost benefits will become much more visible in 2019, and the retail and SME product and channel positioning will also start to take shape in 2019 as well.
With that, I'll pass it over to Enver to go into details on the financials.
Thank you, Anas. I'm on Slide 13 right now. Let me briefly reiterate some of the Q3 highlights.
It has been a very good quarter, strong core revenues, which are up 2% versus the previous quarter despite the seasonal commission income softness. Net interest income is up 5% in the quarter, and the net interest margin improved by 13 basis points to 2.28%. Operating expenses were broadly flat, and with growing revenues, the cost-income ratio improved by 1.5 percentage points. The risk profile remained unchanged with low-risk cost, low level on nonperforming loans and a very high asset quality. This all resulted in a profit before tax of EUR 160 million for the quarter, which is more than 5% higher compared to the second quarter and 24% better than last year's third quarter. The return on tangible equity at the target of 12% CET1 was slightly above 20% and the pretax earnings per share came in at EUR 1.57.
In terms of balance sheet developments, we had a strong growth in interest-bearing assets for the quarter of almost EUR 1 billion. And with the Q2 buyback that we completed in the third quarter, we done an important optimization measure.
On Slide 14, you'll see the usual overview that we have on P&L and balance sheet and some of our key metrics. I think most of the numbers have been mentioned before. I would only highlight the further improvement of the tangible book value per share, which is up 3% versus previous quarter or EUR 1 and shows a very positive trend on the asset side withdrawing interest-bearing assets of EUR 1 billion in Q3 compared to the previous quarter.
With that, I will move on to the development of core revenues on Slide 15. Strong growth of net interest income, which was up 5%, and net interest margin, again, up 13 bps. There are 3 main drivers behind that. So firstly, as announced in Q2, we finished the Tier 2 buyback in July, and this has a positive impact of approximately EUR 4 million per quarter going forward. Secondly, we had a very good asset deployment in our retail segments and a strong pipeline conversion in our International lending business that led to a 10% net asset growth in the segment. And last but not least, we also managed our excess cash position and deployed more liquidity into interest-bearing assets.
As expected, the net commission income was seasonally lower, and we also saw some weaknesses in integrated sales and insurance products just given the high market volatility in Q3. Overall, I would say very good development of core revenues despite the seasonal headwinds and a very good momentum for the remainder of the year.
With that, moving on to operating expenses on Slide 16. This will be a rather short update. Operating expenses up broadly flat versus Q2 with the cost-income ratio of 42.4%, showing a 1.5 percentage point improvement in the quarter. Our new bolt-on acquisition in Hamburg is already partly reflected in numbers, which already closing took place in September.
What are the further trends? We'll continue to focus on efficiency, of course, and we should see the full benefit of the optimization measures of our acquisitions in 2019. On our branch network transformation called Concept 21, it's progressing very well, but we are also making investments, and these measures will lead to an increase in staff costs in the coming quarters as well. All in all, I would say a strong performance for this quarter that puts us in a very good spot as far as exceeding the 2018 guidance of the target cost-income ratio of below 46%.
Switching to the next page, Slide 17. Very solid quarter on the risk side. Risk cost ratio was at 12 basis points, and our NPL ratio actually improved from 1.8% to 1.7%, reflecting our focus on developed markets with still 75% of our customers being in our home countries in the Germanic-speaking region and 25% in Western Europe and the United States.
In this context, maybe just to highlight some topics. Number one, we have no relevant exposures to Turkey, Russia sea or generally broad emerging market.
Number two, our business is mainly domestic metrical banking, and we do not have any operations in countries with elevated AML risk, and we also avoid certain asset classes just in general, such as construction financing. Overall, we will remain patient, disciplined and will always focus on risk-adjusted returns. We strongly believe that this approach will serve us well in the longer term and strengthen the resilience of our business model.
On Slide 18, so we, again, have 2 pages on capital: One to show the overall development and key points, and the second one is more detailed walk of our CET1 ratio. So our fully loaded CET1 ratio came in at 15.3%, which is 10 basis points higher than Q2 and up 180 basis points on a year-to-date basis. The excess capital above our management target of 12% CET1 ratio stands now at approximately EUR 660 million compared to the mid-term target of EUR 2 billion excess capital that we have.
A brief update also on the recent EBA ECB stress test. So our 3-year cumulative CET1 impact in the adverse scenario would have been 240 basis points compared to the industry average of 395 bps. And also in this scenario, we would land at a CET1 ratio of 11% compared to the average of 10.1%. Overall, I think a good reflection of the resilience of our business model and the strong asset quality with the focus on developed markets.
Moving to Slide 19. So what are the key drivers behind the quarterly CET1 ratio walk? It's really 3 elements. On the one side, we have earnings that contribute around 60 basis points per quarter, which is in line what we have seen in the previous quarters. Secondly, we executed a Q2 buyback in July. That was a negative 30 bps impact, and then we launch our share buyback program for roughly 1.3 million shares, which was completed by more than 70% at the end of the quarter and actually was fully completed year-to-date. That was 20 basis points negative.
So in a nutshell, plus 60 basis points from earnings and minus 50 basis points from the capital buybacks. That is how we moved from 15.2% to 15.3%. If we now true for the 50% dividend payout, the CET1 ratio would then be at 14.5%. We have not yet finalized the PPA of SĂĽdwestbank, which will lease or release of the prudential filter once completed. It's roundabout 20 basis points that is still left. Overall, with the completion of both buybacks, this was strategically a very important step for us.
And with that, I would like to hand back over to Anas.
Thanks, Enver. So I'm on Slide 21, everyone.
We wanted to just recap our targets for 2018, which are comprised of the following: Pretax profit growth of greater than 5%, cost-income ratio under 46%, return on tangible common equity greater than 15%, this is applying a 12% CET1 ratio to adjust for the excess capital levels; and the CET1 ratio of fully loaded equal to or greater than 12%. As I stated earlier in the presentation, we feel very good about our operating performance during the first 3 quarters of the year and on track to exceed all of our 2018 targets.
Lastly, on Slide 21, we wanted to highlight the pace of capital accretion during the first 3 quarters against our stated target of generating over EUR 2 billion excess capital through the end of 2020. Again, this is based on amounts greater than 12% CET1 ratio and how we ultimately plan to deploy our excess capital.
As of the third quarter, we built up excess capital of EUR 660 million. This is net of the capital actions Enver mentioned. Our primary objective is to deploy our excess capital into organic growth as well as M&A that generates returns consistent with our return on tangible equity target of greater than 15%. To the extent that we are unable to deploy our capital and organic or inorganic growth at stated returns, we will be good stewards of capital and return excess capital to shareholders. We target an annual dividend payment in 2018 of 50% as well as pursuing stock buybacks.
With that, operator, let's open the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Pawel Dziedzic with Goldman Sachs.
So the first question is just a follow-up on your dividend policy you just reiterated. How should we think about the timing of announcement if you are in a position to pay more than 50% for current year. It's -- the year is not over, but clearly, you haven't closed any dues yet. Do you have enough clarity at this point in time to perhaps indicate that the higher payout is in the cards? And if not, at what point in time this announcement could come? So that's the first question. And then I have a more detailed question on your performance. The first one is on SĂĽdwestbank. So going back to Slide 11. Your cost income is still above 60%, and I think you're showing that your costs are falling but so are your revenues. So I wonder if you can help us understand a little bit better dynamics here going forward. On the slide, you mentioned 35% to 40% cost base reduction on the current plan. If I look in the change in your cost base between first and third quarter, it's around 9%. So is it fair to assume that there is further 25% to 30% that could materialize by the end of 2019? And how should we think about revenue erosion as well next year? And maybe one very short question on International Business, so Slide 9. Can you give us a little bit more detail on what drove this 10% asset increase and how should we think about level of NII, which is up 15% quarter-on-quarter? Is it sustainable or not?
Thanks, Pawel. Let me just start by, again, apologizing to everyone on the phone for the technical issues that we experienced earlier in the call. So we apologize for that, and if anybody has any items that we need to follow up on, obviously follow up with our Investor Relations, and we should hopefully have a clean transcript. So Pawel, on your questions, let me go through it. Full year dividend is the expectation, so that will be at the end of the year, I think we're talking about...
February of '19 is the announcement.
February will be the announcement in terms of the full year dividend. We're still committing or sticking to the 50% dividend payout. I think you had asked a question with regards to are we going to increase that capacity or amount. We're still committing to the 50% payout. As far as SĂĽdwestbank, I would look at it this way, Pawel, the -- so you're right, absolutely. There's revenue erosion. We've been focusing more on the operational restructuring. The cost-out probably will be about 40% to 44% from the day 1 overall cost base. The erosion that you're seeing today is more around the capital optimization. So I think you have to look at it in light of not just top line overall gross revenue but also kind of the return on tangible equity when you apply a 12% CET1. We don't give any specific targets in terms of top line versus OpEx. All we've said and will be consistent in saying this is we'll hit the overall group targets. So we plan to by 2020, we had a return on tangible equity of over 15% and then obviously the cost-income ratio should be pretty much in line with the overall group. And then as it relates to the International lending business, the 10% net asset growth, that was primarily driven by our real estate portfolio lending opportunities, which we had indicated in prior quarters in terms of having a subtle pipeline. So we see good opportunities in that space. I hope that answers your questions.
No, very clear. Maybe just one follow-up on SĂĽdwestbank. So you don't give, let's say, guidance on top line. But the cost income should gradually improve, let's say, until 2020. Is that a fair assumption?
Yes. Yes, that's correct. I think you mentioned 25% to 30% of incremental cost-out, but without getting into specifics, yes, the cost-income ratio will improve.
And I guess, you gave a little bit indication about the timing of this cost saving. So you mentioned it will come really throughout 2019. So I think we can understand that. When it comes to, let's say, inflection point of revenues, have you worked down already? Will they see them stabilizing anytime soon or perhaps not yet? How should we think about...?
I think we'll see from '18 -- as a whole of the unit, you'll see '18 and '19, an improvement in the overall returns in the cost-income ratio so -- versus getting the individual P&L lineup.
Next question is from the line of Stefan Maxian with RCB.
Just a few questions. First on the acquisition of Deutscher Ring. Can you refer to the one-off that is triggered by that acquisition? I assume it's either EUR 25 million or EUR 22 million booked in the corporate center. So it seems that you bought the bank for EUR 1. Could you refer to why it was only EUR 1 and what risks are attached to that bank if you can buy it at that price? Then why did you book it actually in easygroup segment and not under SĂĽdwestbank, which should be the hub for the German operations? And then maybe you could refer a little bit to your further M&A ambitions. So if it's still the target countries of Germany and Austria mainly or also Switzerland? And finally, on the Qlick launch, which you now reflect for the fourth quarter, what would be the launch costs that would be attached to that?
Thanks, Stefan. So on Deutscher Ring, it is booked in the -- the onetime is booked in the corporate center, which was 25. That already considers all the cost attached to that, which is researching cost and also reflecting any potential liability, which we took off. On the slide why we put it under easygroup. Fairly simple, it falls under the nonbranch channels, and it's in the International retail, and also the Austrian Building Society is under easygroup. So to be consistent with that approach, we classified it under this group. When it comes to M&A focus, like Switzerland, I think the main focus is Germany, but we also look at Austria. So I would say Germany and Austria will remain the main focus. And on the launch of Qlick, we don't disclose any cost attached to that.
But you will launch it in the fourth quarter now.
Yes.
Next question is from the line of Gabor Kemeny with Autonomous Research.
Gabor here. Firstly, on NII, a decent performance in the third quarter. Do you think we have seen the full impact from optimizing your liability structure and cash utilization in the third quarter? Or shall we expect some further uplift here in the coming quarters? And turning to the International Business, you talk about a solid pipeline, a significant increase in NII in Q3. Could this NII growth turn into a trend here in the International Business? So has this actually turned the corner?
So on the first one, I think on optimizing the liability structure, yes, I think we will look into other options as well, but the Q2 buyback was definitely the more significant one. When it comes to cash deployment, this is somewhat over, so we are further looking into opportunities to deploy this excess cash, which was very successful in Q3, and we hope to continue that in the further quarters. When it comes -- I think you asked about the NII trend. We don't give any trends, as you know, on the top line. What we look is not on a quarter-to-quarter basis, but we also start looking on a multiquarter period internally so to see where the NIM is, and that was actually quite stable, if you look at that number, but we don't give any further guidance.
I would just add to that, Gabor. When you think about the overall balance sheet optimization, that's not something that just happens in a few months. That's something that you chip away at slowly, and I think we've started doing a nice job of that in the third quarter, but that'll be a gradual process.
Understood. And just to follow up on the excess capital distribution you've talked about. How shall we think about the magnitude of the possible surplus capital you would seek to distribute? You have this 12% CET1 target. Would you want to pay out any excess above that? Or would you want to keep a buffer for potential acquisitions?
Gabor, this is consistent with what we've said in terms of our annual and 3-year targets. We run the business at 12% CET1 on a fully loaded basis. Any excess capital that we generate, obviously, we'd like to put that into organic growth all day long. If we don't have the organic growth, it's M&A that provides a return on tangible equity return of over 15%. In the absence of both of those items, we will be good stewards of capital, and we're going to do the 50% payout in terms of the dividend, and stock buybacks is another capital tool to use, so I think to answer your question, 12% is where we see kind of running the bank at a stable level.
So just to make sure I read this correctly, so provided that you wouldn't see major M&A opportunities early next year and growth remains roughly where it is, would you want to distribute most of what you have? You would want to distribute what you have?
Gabor, look at it on an annual basis. So that's exactly the point. We'll assess it against those criteria that is laid out on an annual basis. Correct.
Next question is from the line of Giulia Aurora Miotto with Morgan Stanley.
A couple of questions from me as well. So if I can go back to the International Business, plus 10% asset growth. Could you please give us some color around what these assets were and where do you see the most interesting risk-adjusted pricing at the moment and how the pipeline is looking here? So that's my first question. And then, if I can just ask a clarification on Slide 7. So when you show the branch transition, so for example, 141 as of September '18, does this mean that customers of the branches that have been closed cannot go to the branch anymore and ask for banking services? Or does this just mean you have stopped actively marketing any services but, on a reverse inquiry basis, those branches are still available?
You want to go ahead on the branches and I'll take...?
Yes, so speaking of the branches, so what we show customers can cancel U.S. transactional services. So we have an OTC business there as well in self-service dividers. When it comes to advisory, these customers have been shifted basically to our branch network. That's what this number shows.
So Giulia, on the International lending business, we said it in the second quarter that we were building up a good pipeline. We were fortunate enough to execute on that pipeline. I think we still have a good pipeline here as we stand in the fourth quarter. We don't give the details in terms of the breakout of the specific opportunities by country or what the actual transactions are, but we've indicated that we see good opportunities in real estate portfolio lending. We don't break out the specific pricing there, but we think, on a risk-adjusted basis, these are very attractive lending opportunities. As far as overall trends and kind of the -- we don't do that by individual business segment. Quite frankly, we don't do the volume trends across any of our business units because we don't want to fall into the trap of chasing volume. We want to make sure that we're patient and disciplined. I know we say that quite -- very frequently, but that's really how we operate the business. If it's a good risk-adjusted return, when you look at the pricing, when you look at the asset quality, when you look at the credit environment of the country you're actually lending in to, if all those factors look good, then obviously, we'll pursue those transactions or lending opportunities. So we'll be disciplined, and we're not going to put out any targets just given the cyclical nature of the business, but things look good in terms of overall pipeline today.
Got it. And if I can just quickly follow up on the International Business. You mentioned in the past that covenants were being relaxed, and in some transactions, you were uncomfortable with, not necessarily the yield, per se, but just the risk associated with it. Is this a trend you're still seeing or perhaps you're just focusing on pockets where still the covenants make sense, and so you're happy to take the risk?
It's a good question. When we say pricing challenges in the DACH Corporates & Public Sector, more on the corporate side for DACH. You also see, in terms of covenants, loosening of standards. So for us -- and it's not just specific that DACH gets across any type of corporate lending or retail lending, for that matter. If you see a loosening of credit standards, that's a early warning sign. So we'll pull back and be patient. And it's got to be a good mix between price and overall credit quality, and credit quality is best reflected in the terms, the advance rates, the collateral, the various provisions that you have in your loan docs.
Next question is from the line of Simon Nellis with Citibank.
Just on the Deutscher Bausparkasse transaction. Can you tell us roughly how much risk-weighted assets and assets were added in the quarter? That will be my first question.
Yes, so the risk-weighted assets was roughly EUR 200 million. You had loans of EUR 330 million and some securities of EUR 200 million. So balance sheet EUR 0.5 billion. All the way is EUR 200 million.
Second question will just be on the French mortgage book. Can you give us an update on the risk weights and if there's any potential to lower that?
So it's in line with what you said in Q2. So we did the first step of optimization. At this point, we will just let it run out. So it's still at I think 75% average, and now it's just running off -- normal cycle.
No change expected there.
No.
Cool. And maybe just last, if you can give us an update on the city of Linz. I think there were rumblings that you might be able to go into -- out of court mediation? Or is that not happening?
Simon, consistent with what we've said historically, I think over -- every time this question is posed, we are in the business of looking to settle if there's an opportunity. We're very pragmatic. We want to turn over a new leaf and focus kind of on the future and put this issue behind us so, to the extent that we can pursue mediation talks, or if there's space available to get a deal done, we'll absolutely pursue that, and we've been pretty consistent on that.
So there's no new development on that front that you can share?
There's been discussions with the city. The judge had asked the parties to enter into mediation talks. It's something that we have more than happily obliged in terms of communicating our interest, and it's something we'll try to pursue.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Marcell Houben with Credit Suisse.
I have 3 left, if I may. The first one is the M&A. Can you talk a little bit about the pipeline there? That went rapidly quiet recently. Just wondering if anything changed regrading the opportunities in potentially Germany. Do you will see a lot of mismanaged assets that you can buy there? And then on the cost-to-income ratio target by 2020, so the 40%. Can you give us some dynamics or just a little bit of feeling regarding the revenue and the cost dynamics there? Is it more revenue driven? Is it more cost driven? I don't expect any numbers here but just a feeling as to which direction I should look at. And then the third one is on the branch's optimization in Austria. Given that the Austrian Post is, sort of, out, do you expect some inflation regarding variable compensation as you could replace Austrian Post members with your own employees, which is, look obviously, compared to be a little bit better based on performance?
Let me start with the last one because that's an easy one. Actually, that's not the case if you think historically of the cost structure of the advisers we're paying for versus the advisers that we'll be bringing on, as you call, our employees. There's actually a labor arbitrage of benefit there. So that it's not -- we actually aren't seeing cost inflation on that front. On the M&A, look, we'll be patient, Marcell. It's something that we'll evaluate a number of opportunities. We are evaluating a number of opportunities at the moment, some good, some not so good. Obviously, our focus or bias is on opportunities or platforms that require operational transformation. I think we do that pretty well, and that's our focus area. But again, it's got to be the right strategic fit. It's got to come at the right price. You got to price in the restructuring. You got to price in any asset liability management. We tend to avoid the platforms that have credit issues -- significant credit issues because those just are overwhelming. And we'll be disciplined. We're not just going to chase deals for the sake of putting points on the board. And it's only been almost a year or so since we signed, I guess, and closed SĂĽdwestbank. It's actually even less. It's been 10 months. We closed on the Deutscher Ring Bausparkasse -- albeit, it's a very small platform. So I always have to remind people these things takes time, right. So yes, we're evaluating a number of opportunities. I think you had a question on the cost-income ratio, which I'll pass to Enver.
Yes, so Marcell, we don't communicate the individual P&L lines, but I think it's fair to say it's going to be a mix of both, so it will be on the cost side but also on the income side.
And the next question is from the line of Christoph Blieffert with Commerzbank.
I have 3 questions on your retail segment, please. First of all, you mentioned that 420,000 clients are affected by the separation from the Post. What are your expectation with regard to potential client losses after you have completed the exit from the Austrian Post branch network? Secondly, what will happened to the transaction services you are currently offering in Austrian Post branches, which you have already exited after the termination of the agreement with the Post? And thirdly, if there are any penalty fee you need to pay to the Austrian Post for the early termination of the corporation?
So thanks, Christoph. Let me start with the offer in the Post branches that we'll have. So as mentioned before, our customers still can go to a Post branch and do their transactional services as well as using the self-service devices. All advisory services and the full banking spectrum is not in our branch network. You mentioned the penalty. That's actually been reflected in our full year numbers of 2017. So that was, if you want to call it a breakup fee, that was fully reflected and adjusted in the P&L of Q4 2017.
Can you remind us of the P&L?
Yes. We disclosed, I think, EUR 110 million roughly that was the upfront payment for the separation. And the first one, could you please repeat that question?
Yes. You said that 420,000 clients are exit. And what is your expectation with regard to potential losses?
Yes, I mean, we don't give a forecast. So far the progress was very good. As Anas said, we had a very high customer retention rate, which was 95% or higher. So far we don't observe any relevant customer losses, but we don't give any forecast.
We have no further questions. I hand back to our moderator for closing comments.
Thank you, operator. Again, thanks, everyone. Apologies for the technical glitch earlier in the presentation. If you need any -- if you have any questions, reach to our Head of Investor Relations, Jutta. and with that, hopefully, we hope to talk to you guys in February. Have a good day, and we'll talk to you guys soon. Take care.