MediaTek Inc
TWSE:2454
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
879
1 500
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches TWD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Welcome to the MediaTek 2021 Third Quarter Investors Conference Call. Financial results and presentations for today's call are available on the Investors section of the company website at www.mediatek.com.
And now, I would like to turn the call over to Ms. Jessie Wang, the Deputy Director of Investor Relations. Ms. Wang, please proceed.
Good afternoon, everyone. Joining us today are Dr. Rick Tsai, MediaTek's CEO; and Mr. David Ku, MediaTek's CFO. Mr. Ku will report our third quarter results, and then Dr. Tsai will provide our prepared remarks. After that, we will open for Q&A.
As a reminder, today's presentation will provide forward-looking statements based on our current expectations. The statements are subject to various risks and factors, which may cause actual results materially different from the statements.
The presentation material supplement non-TIFRS financial measures. Earnings distribution will be made in accordance with financial statements based on TIFRS. For details, please do refer to the safe harbor statement in our presentation slide.
In addition, all contents provided in this teleconference are for your reference only, not intended for investment advice. Neither MediaTek nor any of the independent providers is responsible for any actions taken in reliance with content provided in today's call.
Now, I would like to turn the call to our CFO, Mr. David Ku, for the third quarter financial results.
Thank you, Jessie. Good afternoon, everyone. Now let's start with the 2021 third quarter financial results. The currency here is in NT dollar.
Revenue for the quarter was TWD 131.1 billion, up 4.3% sequentially and up 34.7% year-over-year. Gross margin for the quarter was 46.7%, up 0.5 percentage points sequentially and up 2.5 percentage points year-over-year.
Operating expense for the quarter were TWD 31.9 billion, compared with TWD 29.2 billion in previous quarters and TWD 28.4 billion in the same period last year.
Operating income for the quarter was TWD 29.3 billion, up 1.6% sequentially and up 100.2% year-over-year. Non-TIFRS operating income for the quarter was TWD 29.9 billion.
Operating margin for the quarter was 22.3%, decreased 0.6 percentage points from the previous quarter and increased 7.3 percentage points from the year ago quarter. Non-TIFRS operating margin for the quarter was 22.8%.
Net income for the quarter was TWD 28.4 billion, up 2.8% sequentially and up 11 -- 112.2% year-over-year. Non-TIFRS net income for the quarter was TWD 28.9 billion.
Net profit margin for the quarter was 21.6%, decreased 0.4 percentage points from the previous quarter and increased 7.9 percentage points from the year ago quarter. Non-TIFRS net profit margin for the quarter was 22%.
Earnings per share for the quarter was TWD 17.92, up from TWD 17.44 in the previous quarter and up from TWD 8.42 in the same quarter last year. Non-TIFRS earning per share for the quarter was TWD 18.23. A reconciliation table for our TIFRS and non-TIFRS financial measures is attached in our press release for your information. And that concludes my comments. Thank you.
Thank you, David. And now I would like to turn the call to our CEO, Dr. Rick Tsai for his prepared remarks.
Thank you, Jessie. Good afternoon, everyone. Third quarter was another solid quarter for MediaTek. Quarterly revenue came in at the upper end of our guidance with a slightly higher gross margin, mainly driven by healthy demand across our 4 revenue groups.
Today, I would like to start with our fourth quarter guidance and provide some colors on our near term growth drivers. For the fourth quarter, we expect revenue to be in the range of TWD 120.6 billion to TWD 131.1 billion, flat to down 8% sequentially and up 25% to 36% year-over-year, at a forecasted exchange rate of TWD 28.0 to USD 1.
Fourth quarter gross margin is forecasted at 47.5%, plus or minus 1.5 percentage point. Quarterly operating expense ratio to be at 25%, plus or minus 2 percentage points. Based on the midpoint of fourth quarter guidance, MediaTek full year 2021 revenue growth is expected to be 52% and gross margin rate to be 46.4%. Both of which are better than what we guided 3 months ago, which was revenue growth of greater than 45% and gross margin rate of 46%.
The strong performance in both revenue growth rate and gross margin improvement are not limited to 2021 only. Since 2018, MediaTek has grown our revenue by 106% and our gross margin rate has improved by 7.4 percentage points, based on current 2021 full year guidance midpoint. This is a result of our continuous investments in technologies as well as competitive and synergistic product portfolio.
Our track record have demonstrated MediaTek's competitiveness in an intensely competitive global environment, and we are now more resilient against regional volatility. In fact, we are now the largest smartphone SoC maker globally, and we continue to gain shares across all regions of the world. In addition to our leading shares in several emerging markets, our Android smartphone market share in North America will also exceed 35% in 2021.
As we continue to make investments in our technologies, we believe MediaTek will become even stronger, facing any global competition. We also believe that same strengths during the past few years will carry us through 2022. We'll see 2022 as another year of solid revenue growth with healthy profitability.
With that, I'd like to share some trends we are seeing. As we all know, global digital transformation has better technology migration and resulted in higher demand for semiconductors and higher semiconductor content. We have been seeing great benefits across all product lines from accelerating technology migration such as 5G, WiFi 6 and 6E, Bluetooth low energy and 10G PON. Our technology and product portfolio also give us strong competitive edges in flagship segment.
Now let me explain in detail. On mobile phone side, with our flagship entry and our strong position in global 5G expansion, we expect to see continuing strong growth in our 5G shipments and increases in blended ASP next year.
Flagship is a new segment for MediaTek, and we are very confident in our ability to grow our share in this important segment. With MediaTek proprietary design architecture, expertise in low-power design and best-in-class TSMC 4-nanometer process technology, our first flagship product delivers premium performance and superior power consumption. We are excited that our products are being highly recognized by customers.
Today, all major China brands have adopted our 5G flagship SoC. Revenues of the flagship product will begin at end of this year and ramp from first quarter next year. There will be more flagship products in the pipeline for further expansion.
Furthermore, with 5G rollout entering its third year, 5G solutions have been more widely adopted around the world. This year, global 5G penetration rate is at high 30%, and we expect it to exceed 50% next year.
We believe our global leading market share in mobile phone will give us a huge base to enjoy 5G migration in the coming years, supported by our competitive sub-6 gigahertz and millimeter wave solutions.
In addition to our strong 5G presence in Mainland China, we are also seeing strong design activities in Americas, Europe, India and other emerging regions with global brands.
In summary, our world-class technology and product portfolios have led and will continue to enable MediaTek to enjoy advantages of early participation in new product cycles as well as flagship and global expansion in all revenue groups. That said, let me update you our current business progress by each group. First, mobile phone.
Mobile phone was 56% of third quarter revenue and grew strongly at 72% from last year, driven by continuous 5G migration and share gain. However, due to seasonality and the short term smartphone mix shift towards mid-range phones in the fourth quarter, we expect revenue from this group to decline sequentially, but still represents a strong growth from last year. We expect mobile phone business will be back to its growth track in the next -- in the first quarter of next year when we ramp flagship SoCs.
For IoT, computing and ASIC, it contributed 23% of revenues in the third quarter, while growing 22% year-over-year, mainly driven by accelerating 5G and WiFi 6 penetration as well as customer new product launches in smart devices, true wireless stereo Bluetooth headphones and tablets. We expect the momentum to continue in the fourth quarter and start shipping WiFi 6E products to a high-end notebook.
For Smart Home, this group accounted for 14% of revenues in the second quarter and grew 13% year-over-year. Global digital TV demand has been steady. Demand in other TV-related products also stays healthy.
And then Power IC, this group accounted for 7% of the third quarter revenue, growing 26% from last year, mainly driven by higher demand in Power IC amidst the 5G and WiFi 6 upgrade trend.
To sum up, we have demonstrated our capability to deliver strong revenue growth with improving profitability under intense global competition and macroeconomy uncertainties in the last several years.
With our continuous investment in technology and the ability to capture growth opportunities under global digital transformation trend, we are confident that MediaTek will continue our profitable growth in the foreseeable future.
Together with our new cash dividend policies in which we raised the payout ratio to 80% to 85% and then additional TWD 16 special cash dividend for 4 years, we believe MediaTek shareholders will enjoy a strong return.
That concludes my comments today. Thank you.
Thank you, Rick. Operator, we are now ready for Q&A. May we please have the first question? Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] The first one to ask questions, Gokul Hariharan, JPMorgan.
Maybe my first question is on more near term dynamics. There's been a lot of concerns recently about demand weakness in China, especially for overall consumption, including technology products and smartphones. Could you talk a little bit about what MediaTek is seeing from a demand perspective, given MediaTek has a reasonable exposure in China? And I think also you had talked about supply being a little bit limited in the last quarter. After some of these demand weakness, do you still feel supply is still tight or there has been some relaxation in terms of the supply? That's my first question.
All right. The market -- I know people are concerned about the some -- there may be some slowdown or inventory buildup. We are seeing, in general, still a healthy demand and also a healthy inventory with our customers. Of course, if you look at the inventory level compared to, say, 4 -- 3 quarters ago, you had somewhat, but it's still healthy. Even -- especially, compared to the demand picture. So we are comfortable with our demand. And that's why we said earlier in my remarks that we view 2022 still a year of strong -- solid growth and a healthy profitability.
From a supply point of view, since the -- we see, I wouldn't say a softening of the supply constraint, but we see supply to be uneven with some products -- a good example maybe WiFi, we are really way below. Our supply is still way below our demand. However, we are seeing adequate supply presence for our mobile SoC needs. We are -- in general, I think our supply -- we have managed our supply chain in such a way that we can meet our comments earlier for 2022 business, which is a solid growth and healthy profitability. Thank you.
Maybe one more question on your flagship chip, given that we are very close to the chip launch. What is the kind of feedback you're getting? You talked about every China OEM -- major channel OEM designing in. How do you benchmark with your primary competitor right now? And what kind of market share do you feel that you could actually get in the first year? And what is your expectation when we think about next 2 to 3 years in this segment? Like, what kind of market share would MediaTek be looking to secure given that it's a completely new segment that MediaTek is entering into right now?
All right. Well, flagship chips, first, we, of course, understand this is the first time, first year that we're entering this very important segment. We are confident we have a very competitive product in the market. We have shipped silicon to our -- all our major customers, and that's why we have the confidence to design our product.
Comparison to our competitors' product, I would advise you to -- I think there's quite a bit of reporting on the Internet about some comparison. But as I said earlier, we are very confident in our performance and also really a superior power consumption performance.
The market share, we -- again, this is the first year we're moving into this segment. We believe we will catch a reasonable market share. But we're here. We're in this for the long haul. It's not just a one year thing. We are already working on second generation, third generation with better and better IPs and the better and better process technologies. We're here for the long haul. So I'm not too worried about the first year market share or not.
I think we are -- we have a really good product. We will have our share of the market. But even more importantly, it's critical that we build our foundation this year, and then we can have a better and improving market share going forward next year and the year after. Thank you.
Next one to ask question, we have Randy Abrams from Credit Suisse.
I wanted to ask the first question, it's 2 parts, on the 5G. First, on the ASP increase. The last 2 quarters, you mentioned expectation for blended pricing to continue to trend up into next year. Could you go through how much is from launch of flagship versus also new features on the mainstream, keeping up pricing on the mainstream tier relative to 4G when we saw more erosion on the same tier? And then the second part is on that mainstream, how do you see market share and pricing dynamics with your competitor getting better supply and more product out of TSMC?
Randy, I think for the 5G ASP next year, we believe actually with our product portfolio and also with the mix how we focus for next year, and part of the reason -- actually sort of big part of the reason is the flagship entry. We actually feel confident that 5G ASP -- blended ASP will continue. Like you say, I think it's a big part of our 5G entry strategy. I think that's your first question.
I think the second question is actually regarding the mainstream's 5G smartphone. I think, overall, we are seeing -- I think our CEO talked about it earlier, that smartphone competition, which, including 4G and the 5G, are always intensive competition area. And we will say it's not getting worse, but actually it's just stabilized. It doesn't mean -- stabilized doesn't mean it stopped; it's actually just a normal level of intensity, if you like. But, overall, I would say it's actually stabilized right now in terms of competition.
And that goes to the second question. In regards to foundry pricing, it's been well publicized about the lead foundry taking up pricing. If you could run through how you're seeing ability to pass it on, if you could see actually improving pricing across product category?
And then for the implication on margin where now you've lifted it to 47% for the outlook, how do you see margin if you factor in the input costs? Do you think this is the new level, it could go higher or potential risk on the margin?
Randy, I think for the cost up or cost increase on our side, which including the foundry also factoring some to sort of extent, which also including some material. It's actually -- I think that's a industry norm for everyone. So unfortunately, we need to work with our customer to resolve that. So long story short, I guess, we do have a new pricing kicking in, I think, starting from late fourth quarter. And that's, I think, part of the reason why you're seeing the gross margins up a little bit.
And on top of that, I guess, we're also trying to resolve the cost up issues through our optimization of the overall product portfolio, which means we need to -- with the limited resource, limited capacity resource also with the higher costs, we need to optimize our product portfolio. So it's really a combination of pricing and plus optimization of the product portfolio. And I think our goal actually is trying to stabilize and also stabilizing also better margin even in favor of the cost environment. I think that's our goal.
Yes, and to clarify first, stable or better margin. Is that implication -- just to clarify your remarks so far -- pricing would take effect late fourth quarter. I think earlier you mentioned mobile would get back to growth, was that sequential? So at this early stage, we should think factoring pricing mobile up, you could see above-seasonal EBIT growth in the first quarter?
I think for the new pricing, actually its old product lines kicking in the fourth quarter. I think specifically to smartphone, I think what our CEO talked about earlier, I think, it's actually who we're talking about, they're only based on a quarter-over-quarter basis. From a year-over-year perspective, we still see even for fourth quarter on the smartphone side, it's still very strong growth. So I would say, probably the better way to think about on a year-over-year perspective rather than on a quarter basis. In quarter basis, I would say probably the better way to describe that is just the seasonality -- the normal seasonality.
But you did say smartphone Q-over-Q and year-over-year?
Fourth quarter over smartphone actually coming down a bit due to the seasonality. But fourth quarter year-over-year it's still growing strongly.
But first quarter -- sorry, first quarter Q-over-Q would grow?
Yes, given that new product kicking in.
Next in line we have Bruce from Goldman Sachs.
I think one thing I want to ask is that, what is the target of profitably right now. So most of the good companies are talking about value their product with a better profitability. We already see the positive margin trend. So what would be the historical MediaTek was talking about a 45% plus/minus gross margin, but now we're at 47%. So is that the new normalized gross margin we can expect for the mid-to-longer term? Does that include the foundry price hike or other cost hike potentially in the coming years.
Well, of course, for next year's outlook, we will address in more detail in the January conference call. However, I think where I can comment on overall profitability picture. As we are forecasting today, we guide 47% gross margin for fourth quarter. And, I think, as David also addressed a bit earlier on when answering the question here. We see a more stable gross margin going forward. We certainly would, of course, try to beat our record, hopefully, quarter-to-quarter and year-over-year. We guided 44% to 46% gross margin earlier in this year. But we certainly have achieved that at the higher end -- actually above the higher end of our guidance. We'll give you a guidance 3 -- 2 months from now, but I think 47% is the beginning of our new guidance. Thank you.
Is the beginning of the upward trend, is that what I should interpret?
Bruce, we will give you this [ percentage ] next quarter. Let's stay with the next quarter.
So another thing is that we definitely see a mismatch in terms of the components. I think we have some components, for example, like 4G or WiFi is in big shortage. However, some components are in like somehow -- some inventory. So can you help us to understand how investors should view this kind of situation? Because for certain components, they are like -- they see some inventory plus, for certain components they see that deep shortage. When do you think this kind of mismatch can be resolved?
That's a good question. I think investors should look at MediaTek as a whole. MediaTek is a -- of course, we in today's remarks, we really spent most of our effort and time on 5G, because our market position and our flagship share. However, you must not overlook the other, I think, 43% or 44% of our revenue with also a very good profitability.
MediaTek, as a company, I think is -- we can continue to deliver a solid revenue growth and a healthy profitability next year, because we have this -- to a large degree, we have this very balanced portfolio, and they balance each other. Sometimes we are a little low here, but we are somewhat up in the other places.
But in general, I would say again, for the smartphone, which, of course, is our largest segment, we have, I think, a good supply for -- we ship -- how do we say that…
Matching segment.
We shipped not only the SoC, but all the matching components. We have the capacity to ship all our 5G and 4G solutions, shall we say, to our customers next year. However, some segments, and as we all know -- when is the -- the notebook…
The Chromebook.
Yes, the Chromebook segment has slowed down somewhat, but that is more than compensated by our still very, very strong WiFi 6 demand. So, overall, I think we are -- we have concerns about supply/demand. But, in general, we are doing, I think, just quite well. Thank you.
I think the more problem is like, of course, MediaTek is doing a lot better than most of the companies. But at the end of the day, if you have more capacity, you actually can generate more revenues. So when do you think this kind of situation or mismatch for your wafer supply can be resolved?
I think that will take -- if everyone wants to have all the capacity they want, I think, that will take another year or somewhat longer. The mature technology capacity is now being built by multiple foundries. But as you know, the fab building and the process will take 2, 3 years. So we're looking at some time in 2023. But by that time, I'm sure other picture will change too, but that's the best we can see.
Next one we are having Roland Shu from Citigroup.
My first question is -- first, correct me, please, if I heard you wrong. So Dr. Tsai, did you say now you are seeing some actual supply of the mobile SoC? Yes. So my question is, do you mean this is -- actual supply is mainly for 5G or 4G SoC or for both? So this is my first question.
Okay. Let me be clear. I'm saying we have a good supply for our 5G and 4G shipment next year. We have that. Well, we can use some more, but especially on the 4G side. But we have, I think, a good supply.
Okay. Good supply, not actual supply. Okay. So how about now the capacity -- since earlier this year, you said that you already secured enough capacity -- foundry capacity to achieve 40% or 45% of growth this year. So how much revenue you can grow next year from the foundry capacity you have secured so far?
Roland, actually, as we say, currently, we're still early -- I won't say early, still have some time to go to next year. So right now, probably the best guidance we can provide is a solid growth next year. So the actual range or guidance for [ capacity ], wait until first quarter next year.
My second question is, last quarter, you said that you already started a few new switch ASIC [ volume production ] from last quarter. So how was the revenue contribution of the switch ASIC last quarter? And how were the revenue in 4Q? And also how big will the switch ASIC account for the total revenue this year?
Well, assuming you're referring to our enterprise business, right, where there is a switch ASIC. Actually its more than a switch, it's the enterprise asset. I think without several of the design wins, I think the revenues gradually ramp. But the overall product cycle, especially the ramping up schedule on the enterprise asset side, in general, is much lower compared to normal consumer product. So on the absolutely revenue contribution right now is still mild, especially if we only focus on fourth quarter this year.
So for fourth quarter this year, we are going to see some revenue contribution, right?
Yes, we will have some revenue, yes, small revenue.
How about next year?
I think it will continue. The revenue will not just stop one quarter to other. Once we get into designing and then we start the ramp, normally it's a multiple quarter if not years of ramping up. Sometimes very slow, sometimes the speed maybe vary. But in general, one project will go for, I would say, a quarter plus in terms of ramping up.
And next in line for question is Nick Gaudois from UBS.
Just going back to the question on the foundry and [ I know that ] price increases. How much of that is already factored in your guidance for Q4 '21? And how much more could we see in 2022? And how do we think about the net impact on your gross margin, if any? I know you're setting that through mix shift, pricing, et cetera. That's the first question.
And the second question is beyond what you commented upon on smartphones where you've effectively have shifted to the higher end next year. Could you give us other examples where you think you have still ability to shift mix to the higher end over the next 2 to 3 years, also in that way offsetting some of these input cost increases, we think?
I think the first question first, in terms of pricing, as we explained earlier, our new pricing will start to kick in the fourth quarter. We probably will not be able to separate that, the net impact to our gross margin, as I explained. The overall gross margin is a combination of the new pricing and also the product mix and sometimes it's actually gets a correlation and therefore they are interrelated. So we probably will not be able to separate it out.
Probably the better way to think about that is actually, we kind of talking about a gross margin trend although it's even in the environment of cost up environment, we're trying to stabilize and also better the gross margin a bit through pricing and also product mix. I think that's point number one.
Your question number two is really the product mix. I think we kind of explained is that, while the key point next year is truly just a flagship entry. And flagship -- the higher -- much higher ASP profitability in general is better. And also, they will have the ripple effect. They help us both on the mainstream and also on the entry level as well. And once we can get into the flagship, I think, overall, the product mix will continue to -- we do have some capability, especially given the fact that overall capacity is still very tight, even though with end capacity. But it will mean actually we can [ reasonably ] allocate the capacity to the product portfolio, we think probably the more reasonable. And I think this is how we get into the product mix. But by and large, I think one of the key major factor is still the flagship entry.
Next one to ask questions, Brett Simpson from Arete Research.
Rick, I had a question for you on the captive chip efforts we're seeing in the industry. I think we've -- this is not something that's new, but we've seen Oppo more recently build a sizable semiconductor team, a lot of ex MTK guys have joined that team. We've also seen Google launched their own application processor in the Google Pixel 6. Can you just share with us your perspective on this? How do you assess these captive efforts? And to what extent might this negatively impact your Android growth opportunity over the next 2 to 3 years?
Brett, yes, that's a good question. I agree with you that this is a trend going on in the industry. The OEMs and the -- maybe sometimes OEM and chip suppliers. I view this as -- I would say, net neutral. Of course, some Internet company or OEM, designing their own chips, which we may have the access, if they don't. But on the other hand, we've also worked with many of them to supply our IP and our design expertise, so that become other kind of business opportunity for us. Actually, we are -- we are actually actively engaging in that kind of business already.
And in many ways, we get because of our superior and the key IP that many of them are coming to us so that they can use our key IPs, and our integration -- chip design integration capability to build a competitive product for them, and business opportunities for us.
So it's very difficult to say exactly the net result a positive, and I don't really view that way. I just view them with a different kind of opportunity, and we are -- we just continuously invest in our capability so that we become -- most importantly, we become technology-wise much more relevant. So we will get our share of the business.
Maybe just as a follow-up, I was keen to get your perspective on 5G adjacencies. So what's MediaTek's strategy to leverage what you've done in smartphones into new markets? So we hear a lot about 5G fixed wireless access and automotive going -- car industry going 5G. I think Qualcomm has talked about a $10 billion order backlog in their automotive business. We can hear a lot about industrial modules going 5G. Can you maybe just share with us how does MediaTek, sort of, leverage all this 5G knowhow into these adjacency markets? And how should we think about the timing here for you to build businesses -- sizable businesses outside of smartphones with 5G?
Well, we are very keen on this part of the business. 5G modem capability is one of the more rare, I would say, as such in the market and will become even more so going forward. So we are -- and we also -- and if you look at the modem applications up to now, it's mostly in the smartphone or high-speed applications. But there are other applications -- the low-latency part, the massive connected device part of the 5G technology still remain to be marketed, shall we say. So we are certainly developing modem IPs extending into different operating regimes, so that we can capture the applications, some of which you just mentioned yourself. But we don't -- well, I hope that we can say that we don't leave any stone unturned here. But this is one -- some of the CPE business that we are working with the operators -- major operators are just a beginning of our endeavor in this part. Thank you.
Next one to ask question, Charlie Chan from Morgan Stanley.
So my first question is to follow Nick's question about the innovation of customers' semiconductor. So besides the Pixel phone using the internal processor, I think recent news also indicated that one of your key customers, Oppo, tried to develop their own SoC. So my question is that whether there is also a threat and whether that there is just sort of processor instead of using an SoC.
And also in the Chromebook, I think, Google also mentioned that they probably want to do their own processor. But that seems to be one of your long term opportunity as well for those Chromebook processors. So can you sort of address those 2 issues?
Yes, I think this question quite similar to what Brett just asked. Again, my position is, the key -- is the key -- if technology is under IPs than we must develop that -- that very few people can do as well as we can. We have to outrun your potential competitors, and sometimes they are also our partners. So it's all a matter of, when you look at it, the IP's capability, the schedule of the availability and the integration, because integration of those very highly sophisticated chips takes a lot of resources -- a lot of resources. So all those combined together, I think, provide us opportunities and competition.
But, I think, up to now, we have -- we have at least access to the opportunities. We cannot sometimes serve all the opportunities either, because we have also limited resources for our own products and for other partners' requirements. Hope I answered some of your questions.
Yes, I think that's helpful. My personal opinion is that they're modern, still very difficult and a key technology. So maybe there's still your key advantage here.
And another question is more about your gross margin sustainability into next year. So great to hear that you can pass through some costs and stabilize your gross margin. But if you look at the end markets, there are some hard data, right? For example, the China smartphone sell-through or sell-in Y-on-Y is still like down Y-o-Y in recent months.
And another key data from MIT shows that the 5G mix in China continue to decline from 82% in July to 73% in September. So in that conjecture it seems like a demand is not that strong and also the mix of the 5G is actually kind of going down. So what's your assumption for the 5G penetration for China, whether you can reaccelerate again? And also for the emerging markets outside of China, what would be your 5G penetration assumption?
I ask this because it looks to me if 5G penetration need to go up next year, probably the price points for 5G SoC need to go down by one or 2 nodes. Now, not sure if that is also what company is seeing.
Okay. Well, we all read China's data carefully. We all have equal access. So we have that in our assumption in our plan for 2022 5G shipments. Of course, for us, we understand the China basic -- general smartphone sales has slowed down. 5G penetration probably also -- well, 80% is a very high ratio, that's a very high rate considering the short period of time. To achieve that is really amazing. So the things will moderate somewhat. But -- so important thing for us is to, as stated several times, really to up our mix -- it's really to up our mix, so on both quantity and the revenue mix.
But on the other hand, we also look at very carefully of the 5G demand outside of China and especially to our surprise, actually, the more emerging markets that the sales of the 5G phone in 2021, the growth has been surprisingly good. And the way we -- actually, we just had a review -- actually just now today for India. We see really a robust growth for those markets. And our chips are really well suited for those market also. So a lot -- I would expect a lot of our quality will go to those markets outside of China, but we also expect some of our high-end chips to also go to those markets outside of China, too. We are still, as I said earlier, we still see a really healthy growth in our revenues in the 5G smartphone next year.
So in that case, do you think smartphone margin or 5G margin can be still similar to corporate average in next year, yes, given some weak demand or customers their own kind of margin pressure?
Well, I think Charlie, short answer is yes. Like we explained earlier, I think overall corporate gross margin goal is to minimalize and better under the sort of cost up situation. And if you do the math, I mean, the smartphone gross margin, you need to do the similar pattern given the fact smartphone in fourth quarter will account for more around 55%, 56% of the overall revenue. So it's in line with corporate average.
Last one to ask question is Laura Chen from KGI.
My first question is that we already see that MediaTek as #1 smartphone SoC maker globally. I'm just wondering that aside from our collaboration with Android or Google in Chromebook, I'm not sure if MediaTek has any plan to work with Microsoft on Windows on laptops, because we see that could be a sizable market for MediaTek to further leverage your current technology and advantage. That's my first question.
Good question, Laura. Short answer is, yes. We, certainly, intend to do that. It's not going to be easy, of course. But we have the capability from our technology, our IP. And I think if all -- well, it's becoming -- the ARM architecture is also becoming more and more mainstream, but we're not going to just leave that market untouched.
Yes, that's good to know that. But yes, but do you have any like maybe near-term target or any timeframe or when we can see that more announcements about MediaTek progress on Microsoft?
No. I think, Laura, I think the -- today's statement is a bit more than quite enough. We will not really comment further. Thank you.
And also a follow-up question, that since we know that in the supply chain the imbalance situation continues, so I'm just wondering from MediaTek's perspective, how do you think that situation will persist. And since the inventory base in the past 2 quarters are also gradually picking up. So how do you imagine the overall supply-demand situation?
Again, we see supply -- I wouldn't say really ample supply, but we are seeing -- we have a good enough supply to meet our 2022 business need. We can use somewhat more, but we understand here that the supply situation also varies from different node to different node. There's a lot of also -- the supply chain -- it is -- I must say, over the past, I would say, 30 years or longer that I have been observing, the supply chain situation is very, very complicated this time. Because not only we have a physical supply deficiency, but also for complicated, shall we say, geopolitical effects. So in that sense, it is much more difficult to manage the supply than before. But staying on that, we are still a point of view optimistic about our capability in managing our supply. But the overall supply constraint and the complication, I think, will last for another year, for sure. Thank you.
The last one to ask questions is Frank Lee from HSBC.
So I just had 2 questions. The first one is just in terms of -- I think you talked a bit about your outlook for next year and then the end market and the focus on moving to the high end for your 5G smartphone. On the other hand, you're also talking about, I guess, next year growth in the emerging market as opportunity for 5G. So I'm just trying to understand, I guess, the mix of shift of -- on a company level, moving your product mix towards high end. But on the other hand, you have kind of an end market next year where higher growth might be more in the mid-to-low end market. So just thinking about like how should we look at the combination of these 2 forces going into next year? That's my first question.
Frank, actually the long story short, I think we kind of answered upfront. On a blended basis, if you put every single one together, like you said, flagship entry and also some of those shipments -- 5G shipments from the emerging markets, I think we still going to see both the volumes increase and also the ASP increase. I think that's based on what we talked about earlier -- all those variable were put in, and that's our focus so far.
And then the second one, just -- my question is on the competition for next year. You mentioned that it is very -- the supply chain is still quite complicated, but the SoC doesn't seem to be as tight as other components. So as we go into next year, how do you see the environment? I know you've talked about the chip being competitive, but we're also seeing potential -- do we see perhaps a bit more competition than we've seen in the last 2 years, especially as some of your competitors are able to get more capacity support for next year?
Frank, I think like our CEO say, currently, we believe we got ample supply for next year's growth target. And also, we keep talking about we could certainly use more capacity if there's a hurdle. And maybe now that we explain this, actually from industry perspective, I think it's still very tight -- it's still very tight. Otherwise, actually, you're not going to see all those vendors, those including foundry and also the backend are increasing their pricing. Normally, you won't see that unless that overall industry still see some tightness out there. So, again, to answer your question directly, I think we have well secured enough support -- enough capacity support for our growth target, but we could certainly use more. And I think that's it.
And this has been the Q&A session. We thank you for your questions. And now I'm going to hand it over to Ms. Jessie Wang for closing comments. Ms. Wang, please proceed.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes MediaTek 2021 third quarter conference call. We would like to thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect. Thank you.
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, we thank you again for your participation in today's conference. You may now disconnect. Thank you, and goodbye.