WSP Global Inc
TSX:WSP
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
181.27
251.16
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
[Foreign Language] Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. [Foreign Language] Welcome to WSP's Fourth Quarter and Year-end 2019 Earnings Results Conference Call and Webcast. I will now like to turn the meeting over to Isabelle Adjahi, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Communications. [Foreign Language]
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the time to join this call, during which we will be discussing our Q4 and fiscal 2019 performance, followed by a Q&A session. With us today are Alexandre L'Heureux, our President and CEO; and Alain Michaud, our CFO. Please note that this call is accessible on our website via webcast. During the call, we may be making some forward-looking statements, and actual results could be different from those expressed or implied. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these statements. Relevant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements are listed in our most recent MD&A. With that, I will now turn the call over to Alexandre L'Heureux. Alex?
Thank you, Isabelle, and good morning, everyone. As we complete the first year of our 2019-2021 global strategic plan, we are pleased with our 2019 performance which provides us with a solid basis for continued growth. We are particularly pleased with the fact that with the exception of acquisition, integration and restructuring costs, we met or surpassed all of our 2019 outlook targets. There are 3 points I would like to specifically highlight on this call and they are as follows.Firstly, as we will be getting to shortly, we delivered solid performance with organic growth in net revenues across all reportable segments, in addition to posting solid backlog, adjusted EBITDA and cash flow generation in Q4 of '19 and for the year as a whole. This puts us on solid footing as we enter 2020. Secondly, we continue to strengthen our sector expertise and expanded our geographical footprint by completing 8 acquisitions during 2019, totaling approximately $200 million in acquired revenues and 1,800 professionals. Thirdly, we continue to take our accountability for sustainable leadership very seriously, not only in the advice we provide to our clients, but also in our operations. We are proud to have received an A- score for our latest response to the CDP's annual climate change questionnaire and even prouder to be the first professional services firm in the Americas to secure sustainability-linked terms for our syndicated credit facility. If we look at the progress made on each of our 2019-2021 global strategic plan metrics, I'm happy to report that we are tracking favorably towards achieving or exceeding each of them. Let's discuss these achievements. First clients, bring the best of WSP to our clients is at the center of everything we do. As an example, we have expanded our key account programs for both our global private sector clients and public sector clients. Currently, all of our global sectors have diamond client program in place with an emphasis on client management, engagement in opportunity identification, further solidifying the role we have to play as our client's strategic partner. On the employee front, we have continued to develop our people by delivering training and development programs. For example, we continue to push forward our Global Project Management Academy, a 6-month program of tailored program management training. Project management is the one common element across all of our functions and it binds the many operational disciplines together, which is why it is important to invest in our project managers and drive our talents to the next level. This also supports our operational excellence pillar, as investing in our project management capability will not only allow us to manage our resources in an efficient manner, but to operate effectively to achieve the high standards of client service and project delivery. We also continue to focus our efforts on reducing and removing the health and safety risk associated with our activities. Various initiatives were carried out regionally and globally to ensure that health and safety remain front of mind for employees by means of visible safety leadership, regular communications and training, resulting in fewer employees being exposed to harm in our business on our journey to zero harm. Our ethics and compliance team also help sustain our continuous spotlight on ethics by working to embed principled decision-making into key processes and initiatives. Last on the expertise front, our teams have continued to challenge the status quo to transform the built environment through innovative forward thinking, advice and unparalleled expertise. We are designing the next iconic building in Dubai, providing strategic insight on a complex, large-scale rail project providing access to Britain's busiest airport. Our experts are committed to finding solutions that help our clients and communities to thrive in an ever-changing world. In conclusion, all of this favorably positions us to meet our 2019-2021 global strategic plan targets, and I would like thank all of our leaders and employees for our performance and for their continued dedication to WSP. We are especially proud to have delivered such a performance while delivering good returns to our shareholders.Let me now take a moment to discuss our operational and financial performance in greater detail. Organically, 2019 has seen growth in net revenues across all of our reportable operating segments. This past year we have completed projects of varying sizes and complexities, allowing us to provide lasting solutions for the development and the betterment of the communities within which we operate. This growth has also been nurtured by our ability to seize various opportunities for our clients as a result of our capacity to cross-sell expertise, translating into improved project delivery. This proves not only that we are a trusted adviser to our clients, but also a strategic partner. Fiscal 2019 net revenues were $6.9 billion, up 14.4% year-over-year, while organic growth in net revenues stood at 3.5%. Adjusted EBITDA was $1 billion, with adjusted EBITDA margin of 15.1%, 410 basis points higher than last year, mainly resulting from the adoption of IFRS 16. Excluding IFRS 16, adjusted EBITDA margins would have stood at 11.4%, higher than the 11% reported last year. Lastly, our backlog continues to increase and reach $8.1 billion, representing 10.6 months of revenues. The backlog included organic growth of 3.6%, which is a positive indicator of expected future revenues. Let me now turn to our operational performance. During the course of '19, we acquired 8 companies, 3 of which were completed in the fourth quarter. Through these acquisitions, we added approximately 2,000 employees to our workforce, mainly attributable to our environmental sector, an area we had targeted for growth in our '19-21 global strategic plan. We also entered new geographies: Denmark and the Netherlands. And in addition to building bench strength in the environment sector, we reinforced our expertise in buildings and strategic advisory services. Early this year we closed the acquisition of LT Environmental in the United States, further expanding our presence in the U.S. and expertise in the environmental sector. All these acquisitions were financed using our cash on hand and credit facilities. Let me take this opportunity to once again welcome all of our new colleagues to the WSP family.Regarding the performance of our regions, Canada posted organic net revenue growth of 1.2% and delivered segmented adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin of $207 million and 19.4%, respectively; the highest margin among all of our reportable operating segments. We are pleased with this performance, as it was achieved despite project delays in transportation projects in Ontario. When compared to the same period last year, our backlog in Canada grew 7.5% organically. Significant project wins, such as the twinning of highway 104 project in Nova Scotia, is the result of combining a local presence with our global expertise in transportation. With an expanded pipeline of opportunities, especially in the infrastructure sector, we expect this momentum to continue and are optimistic about the long-term prospects in the Canadian market. The Americas operating segment posted 3.1% organic growth in net revenues and overall strong net revenue growth of 31.2% for the year, stemming mainly from the acquisition of Louis Berger. The region delivered segmented adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA margin of $416 million and 18%, respectively. The pipeline of opportunities for the Americas remain high. In Q4 and as previously mentioned during our last conference call, we have started to work on the preconstruction phase of the multibillion-dollar Texas high-speed rail project, providing civil and structural works engineering. Now turning to EMEIA operating segment, WSP delivered organic net revenue growth of 2.1%, in line with our expectation. We had a strong year in Sweden which delivered organic growth in net revenue of 3.3%. While Brexit continued to create some uncertainty in the UK, the team delivered a solid performance of 3% organic growth in net revenues for the entire year. Following the end of the quarter, Network Rail appointed WSP and the multi-discipline national framework, and on 3 single-discipline regional frameworks for the next 5 years, highlighting our expertise in the rail sector and adding to our backlog. As part of this mandate, we will deliver multi-discipline national design services as well as electrification and plant services in the South East, North West, and Scotland regions, and civil and structural services in the South West. In EMEIA as a whole, adjusted EBITDA and related margin reached $326.8 million and 13.6% for the year, respectively, mainly as a result of the election which took place in the U.K. and because of a strike in Finland. Last, our APAC operating segment posted organic net revenues of 9.3% for the year, exceeding our mid-single-digit growth expectation. This was driven by mid-teens growth in Australia and mid-single-digit growth in both New Zealand and Asia. Adjusted EBITDA and related margins, the APAC region totaled $172.9 million and 15.5% for the year, respectively. Let me pause here to provide a brief update on the situation in China. We are closely following the situation and our health and safety team is focused on the well-being of our people in the region. During the last few weeks, we have proactively asked some of our employees across the greater China region to work from home. The slowdown in the region could have an impact on Chinese operation, however, we do not expect this to have a material impact, as Asia represents less than 5% of our 2019 net revenues. In sum, 2019 was a rewarding year, as we strengthened our business around the globe by focusing on both our organic growth and our acquisition strategy. Alain will now review our financial results in more details and discuss our 2020 outlook. Alain, over to you.
Thanks, Alex, and hello, everyone. For the fourth quarter, revenues and net revenues were $2.2 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, representing a solid growth of 8.1% and 14.3% compared to the same period in 2018. Organic growth in net revenues were 4% on a constant currency basis. For the full year, revenues and net revenues were $8.9 billion and $6.9 billion, growing at 12.7% and 14.4%, respectively. Organic growth amounted to 3.5%, which marks our 10th consecutive year of organic growth. Let's move on to adjusted EBITDA. For the fourth quarter, adjusted EBITDA was $266.3 million, up $96.8 million or 57.1%, mainly as a result of the adoption of IFRS 16. Excluding the impact of IFRS 16, adjusted EBITDA would have amounted to $207.9 million and our adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.1% or 11.8% pre-IFRS, as compared to 11% last year. So the full year adjusted EBITDA was $1.04 billion, up 57.1%; with adjusted EBITDA margin at 15.1%, up from 11% in 2018. On a pre-IFRS 16 comparative basis, these numbers would have been $786.7 million and 11.4%, respectively, compared to 11% last year. Backlog stood at $8.1 billion at the end of the quarter, representing approximately 10.6 months of revenues. Our backlog grew organically by 3.6% when compared to Q4 of 2018. Adjusted net earnings for the quarter were $56.6 million or $0.53 per share, down $2.5 million or $0.04 per share, respective, compared to Q4 2018. For the full year, adjusted net earnings for 2019 of $326.7 million or $3.10 per share, up $31.5 million compared to 2018. In addition to the impact of IFRS 16, it is important to point that non-cash and nonrecurring items affected our adjusted net earnings in Q4 of 2019. Removing the effect of these items, adjusted EPS would have been $3.63 and $0.90 for the full year and Q4, representing increases of 28% and 58%, respectively, over 2018. This performance is consistent with our adjusted EBITDA growth. Let me explain briefly the difference. First, IFRS 16 had an impact of $5.9 million on the quarter, or $0.06 per share, or $23.2 million for the full year or $0.22 per share. Second, in 2019 we renovated our largest office in the United States to optimize our workspace and improve efficiency. It has resulted in a write-off of accumulated leasehold improvement of $18.5 million or $0.18 per share after tax. It's important to note that we were fully reimbursed by the landlord, which is evidenced in the cash flow statement. This payment has been accounted for on our balance sheet and has not affected earnings. Thirdly, we have 12 months to finalize purchase price allocation for our acquisitions, which we did for Louis Berger in Q4, resulting in higher intangible assets, as evidenced in Note 5 to our financial statement, and an amortization catch-up of $10 million or $0.10 per share after tax. Lastly, we took a non-cash write-down of goodwill in South Africa for $3.7 million or $0.03 per share. I will now review a few cash flow metrics. For the year, cash inflows from operating activities stood at $814.3 million compared to $669.7 million in 2018. Our free cash flow for the year came at $441.6 million or 154% of net earnings beyond our cash flow conversion target of 100% of net earnings. At 1.1x, our net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio remained within our target range of 1 to 2 times and this despite us making 8 acquisitions without raising any equity in 2019. This provides us with sufficient leverage to continue investing in organic and other growth initiatives. Lastly, our days sales outstanding continued to decrease and reached 74 days at the end of 2019, a 2 days' improvement as compared to 2018. This improvement, which was better than our expectation, was the result of our team's continued focus on cash collection. During the quarter, we also declared a dividend of $0.375 per share for shareholders on record as of December 31, 2019, which was paid on January 15, 2020. With a 42.3% DRIP participation, the net cash outlay was $22.9 million. In conclusion, we have delivered and in many cases overdelivered on all our 2019 financial outlook metrics. I will now comment on the 2020 financial and operational outlook for each of the regions. But before I do so, I'd like to remind you that the outlook for our anticipated 2020 performance is aimed at assisting analysts and shareholders in refining their perspective on our performance. It has been prepared based on foreign exchange rates effective February 26, 2020. Also please do bear in mind that we have not considered any acquisition, disposal or any other transaction that may occur after today's date. We anticipate net revenues to be in the $7.1 billion to $7.4 billion range and to post organic growth in net revenues in the 2% to 5% range. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to range between $1.07 billion and $1.12 billion. We also anticipate our quarterly adjusted EBITDA to range between 18.5% and 30.5% of the total annual adjusted EBITDA, Q1 being the lowest and Q3 being the highest. Turning to tax, we expect that our effective tax rate for fiscal 2020 will be in the 26% to 30% range, and we anticipate net capital expenditure to range between $140 million and $150 million. CapEx mainly pertains to property and equipment and intangible assets, net of proceeds from disposals and lease incentive received. Turning to debt, we will continue to manage our capital structure to achieve a net debt to EBITDA ratio between 1 and 2 times. Lastly, we anticipate between $40 million and $50 million in acquisition, integration and restructuring costs, driven by the integration based operational optimization, real estate consolidation and restructuring related to our recent acquisition. Head office corporate costs in 2020 will range between $90 million and $95 million, compared to $85.6 million in 2019. Let's now turn to the operational outlook for each of the regions. In Canada with the positive trend and the 2019 end-of-year performance and strengthening of our backlog, we anticipate mid-single-digit organic growth in net revenue. We also anticipate organic growth in net revenue for the Americas, as the integration with Louis Berger is now complete and starting to translate into revenue synergy opportunities. As far as Latin America is concerned, we have completed the integration of multiple acquisitions which are expected to drive net revenue growth for 2020. Organic growth in net revenue for the region is anticipated to be in the low to mid-single-digit range, with some improvement in operating margin. On a consolidated basis, we anticipate mid-single-digit organic growth in net revenues for the Americas reportable segment. For the EMEIA regions, we anticipate delivering organic growth in net revenue in the low single-digits, as after several years of strong net revenue organic growth in the Nordics, economic indicators now point towards to somewhat a cooling off period for Scandinavia. On a positive note, in the U.K. prospect, the public sector remains solid and diminishing concern over Brexit leads us to be more optimistic than at the beginning of 2019. We therefore anticipate organic growth in net revenues in the low to mid-single-digits for U.K. and the Nordics combined. Other EMEIA countries region, namely Central Europe, Middle East and South Africa, are anticipated to deliver low single-digit organic growth in net revenue. Turning to APAC. We anticipate another solid year for our Australia and New Zealand operations, with organic growth in net revenues to range in the mid to high single-digit, stemming from several large project wins and a strong pipeline. In Asia, we anticipate low single-digit organic growth in net revenues for 2020, as various concerns remain in the region, particularly the economic slowdown resulting from the coronavirus infection. On a consolidated basis, we anticipate the APAC region to deliver organic growth in net revenue from mid to high single digit. This concludes our regional outlook. Alex, back to you.
Thank you, Alain. Before we open the lines for questions, I would like to give you a brief update on our M&A strategy. I would like to make it clear, however, that we are not going to comment on market speculations about potential acquisitions. As often mentioned in the past, M&A is a key element of our growth strategy and we intend to be active, but a disciplined player in our industry. We will continue to focus on identifying possible targets across various sectors and geographies, ensuring that their strategy and culture are complementary to ours. In conclusion, 2019 was a good year and a good start of our strategic plan. We therefore remain confident in our ability to meet our strategic ambitions by the end of the 3-year cycle. I realize that this was a long script, so thank you for your patience. But this was the end of the year. And now I would like to open the line for questions. Thank you very much.
[Foreign Language] [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Jacob Bout with CIBC.
I wanted to go back to your commentary on the coronavirus, and how were you thinking about this on a go-forward basis and what have you baked in here for APAC, for instance?
Well, I talked about this already. I said, Jacob, that this is less than 5% of our net fees. But that doesn't mean that because it's less than 5% of net fees that we're not taking from a health and safety point of view, where we're not taking this very seriously. We want to make sure our people are safe. We want to disrupt to a minimum our operation. Clearly the fact of the matter than we have employees working from home, I think it would be -- I don't think it would be reasonable to assume that things are exactly the same as if everybody was working full steam in the office. So the utilization is a bit down. But at the same time, as I said before, this is clearly mitigated by the fact that this is a very, very small piece of our business. So we're not changing our outlook as a result of it.
And then the IFRS 16 impact to EBITDA, I think a little higher than what you initially forecasted. I think the range was $230 million to $240 million. I think you were $244 million for the year. How should we be thinking about that for 2020?
The first year, obviously, it takes time just to adjust and to make sure that all of our IFRS adjustments were made properly. So we came a bit higher than from what we had earlier estimated. I think where I would like to draw your attention is the fact that from year-over-year we've increased almost our margin profile pre-IFRS by almost -- about 0.5% or $0.4%. So we're quite pleased with the progress that we've made in this year. We are clearly tracking in line with our plan and that's why I'm quite pleased about the results in the year.
Last question here, just on the organic growth in the Americas. I know a little less than I think the commentary you made about being a little disappointing, pointing to lower growth in Northeast U.S. and Latin America. Is this lower growth in Northeast U.S., this that kind of a new normal? Is that how we should be thinking about it?
No, actually. We are entering 2020, I believe, in a stronger position than we were at the beginning of '19. Northeast last year, they were -- and for those of our peer group that working in the Northeast, there's a very, very large client that reduced pricing and fee by a significant amount. And I think all of us were impacted by that. So this certainly had an impact in '19. But I don't believe that this is the new reality. I think 2020 is better, and we're still expecting mid-single-digits for the year in the U.S.
Your next question comes from the line of Mona Nazir with Laurentian Bank.
So my first question was just surrounding $29 million in write-offs. I'm just wondering if you could further detail such. I believe Alain touched on some renovations to the U.S. office, which drove the early termination of the lease. Is that one-time in nature, or do you expect further early lease terminations or any write-offs?
Yes, as you may or may not know, and I know I've discussed this in prior calls, probably not in '19, but in previous years. We have completely transformed our workplace environment. And as a result of it, I've lost my office and now it's open space. And this is true for everybody. We're trying to be more disciplined. We're trying to create a collaborative environment for all of our employees. And as a result of it, we did transform our largest office in the world, which is New York City. And we had, as a result of it, to write off our old leasehold improvement. This is not a cash item. But the good news is we were reimbursed by the landlord, and we had an equal cash inflow for new leasehold improvements. So we negotiated a very good transaction with the landlord, and therefore we had a cash inflow, but actually no impact on our earnings as a result of it this year. So to answer your question, this is a one-off. But it's really specific to our New York office, nothing more, nothing less.
Okay. That's very helpful. And then I appreciated your comments on the coronavirus and your Asian operations. I was just wondering. As we see the virus impact spread across the globe, have you experienced any contract delays, bidding activity pushed out or work stoppages in Asia or outside?
No, the answer is no. So it's business as usual. And we need to remember, as I said before and I wish to reiterate that this a very small piece of our business, and it's not touching China as a whole. I mean from where we're sitting in the West, we think that the entire China is shut down. But there are many places that our workforce is still at work. They're working. It's just a [ podded ] location and clearly from a health and safety point of view, we're taking this very seriously. But I think it would be unfair also to think that our entire Asian business has stopped. That's really not the case.
Okay. And lastly from me, as we speak about the M&A pipeline and as per your strategic plan, we're expecting an increase in headcount by about 30%. And I understand we don't want to comment on recent rumors. But looking at the acquisition landscape, is there increased comfort around potential targets? And any thoughts on whether we could see one larger transformational transaction or whether they'll be a number of smaller medium-sized transactions?
Yes, well this is a good question. You know as well as I do that timing or to try to time a large transformational acquisition in a strategic plan is impossible. Those will come -- they will come, and oftentimes we don't time them. I mean had you asked me back in '14 if we had time in our plan to complete the Parsons Brinkerhoff acquisition, I would have said no to you. Similarly, Louis Berger came our way and this was certainly part of the plan back here to acquire Louis Berger. But we had identified this asset as a one-day potential acquisition, and this was clearly in our list of potential targets. But it's very, very hard to time larger sized acquisitions. But the smaller size, I do believe that we have the flow right now to deliver on, and that's why we're feeling confident that with the right attention and the right discipline and focus that we are well on our way to achieve our 2021 plan.
Your next question comes from the line of Mark Neville with Scotiabank.
Maybe just questions on the guidance, the margin, it looks about flat year-over-year for 2020 and you guided 15.1%. In the range for 2021, the target is 15% to 16%. So you're at the bottom end and I guess flat year-over-year. I'm just curious. Is it sort of just being conservative? Is there anything sort of in the numbers this year or anything to think about when we think about that margin?
Well the answer is you need to look at this in a range, you need to look into it. But certainly I mean our goal will be to try to improve our margin profile as we progress the year. We did take a bit more of a conservative stand at this point in time. And as we progress over the next -- over the year, I mean we'll see if this needs readjustment. But for the time being, we believe that that's the right approach.
Okay. That's fair. Maybe in the M&A expense and integration, the $40 million to $50 million, I think it was similar this year. It's I guess just sitting here today and sort of what we've done or the M&A you've done in the last year, it sort of feels like a big number for this year. I'm just curious if it's sort of building in a buffer for other smaller deals you might do through the year, just any comments on that.
This was mainly the result of Louis Berger. You need to remember, without being a transformational acquisition, this was a large acquisition. So I'd say that year-over-year this is probably a reasonable number to expect, and that's why we put that in the outlook this year.
Sorry, the Louis Berger, that was the 2019 number and not the guide, right?
Yes, but there's still some, for instance, real estate consolidation. There is a number of different costs that will -- you're not generating all of your cost synergies in one year. Oftentimes, for instance, real estate will fall into the next year. So that's what we're expecting for this year.
Okay. Maybe just one last one then on the quarter. The corporate costs, again, it was sort of lower than we thought, I think lower than your expectations. But the guide for this year, I guess, was sort of --
Sorry, Neville. Alain is writing something next to me here. But it's true also as you recall when we completed a transaction in October of '18, we had mentioned also that we would incur some restructuring costs of Louis Berger International. And if you go back to the press release, we had detailed the cost and everything related to that. And also there will be some of it in '19 as we continue to restructure our Louis Berger International business. I just wanted to provide more color, just in case.
No, that's helpful. Again, sorry the last question, the corporate cost in Q4, sort of the -- what was behind the decline? And again, it sort of feels like it's one-time, just given the guidance, but just curious what happened in the quarter.
I will let Alain talk to that.
Yes, it was impacted by a one-time FX and some expenses that were lower than expected, so nothing too much to read about this. I think guidance is 90 to 95. And that's a number to keep in mind.
Your next question comes from the line of Benoit Poirier with Desjardins.
With respect to the leverage ratio net EBITDA, obviously you ended the year with 1.1 that's well within the range of 1 to 2. But I would be curious to know what would be your willingness to leverage your balance sheet outside the range, assuming the proper transaction, a very attractive transaction or would you consider a more recent prudent approach, given the economic uncertainty? So I'm just trying to gauge whether you would be willing to go outside of the range for the right transaction.
Look, we've historically Benoit, we've always been a conservative management team. And we guided pre-IFRS between 1.5 and 2.5x. But if I take a second look back at history, you look back before and for those of you who've been following us for a decade now or more, if you recall before WSP, every time we were hitting 1x leverage we were very quick to deleverage, given that we were operating in one country and essentially in 1 or 2 end markets, and we didn't have the resiliency of having a diversified platform. Then we completed WSP. We came out post transaction at 1.4x, 1.5x, if you all recall. And the reason was quite simple. We were feeling more comfortable about the resiliency and the diversification of the platform. Then we did Parsons Brinkerhoff and we came out of this transaction at 2.25x. So the message I'm trying to provide to all of you today is as we build a more resilient platform and a more diversified platform, the management team has been more willing to take a bit more leverage. And you can see this throughout our history. So to answer your question, for the right acquisition, we'd be willing to go a bit above what we've guided over the years. The answer is yes. But would you expect us one day to be at the closing of a transaction above 3.5x or 3.6x? No. That's not what we would envision doing. We would want to be below that.
Okay. Perfect. And I assume, Alex, that it's post-IFRS 16 which is in line with your new disclosure, right?
Yes. So right now when you look at the leverage, I think this is including IRFS 16. So pre-IFRS 16, if I am not mistaken and I'm looking at Alain now; we'd be more closer to 1.5x or something like that in terms of leverage.
Yes, closer to that.
Closer to that, yes.
Okay. So the 3.5 was referring to the 1.5, apples to apples?
Yes.
Okay. Perfect. Got it. Okay. Perfect. And with respect to Canada, what makes you confident that delays in transportation projects [ starts ] in Ontario will end in 2020? What incremental color did you get with respect to the outlook in Canada, Alex?
This is such a -- it's a very difficult questions to answer. Definitely in '19, I have to tell you the team in Canada has to be commended for the great work that they've done. I mean they finished the year above flat for organic growth, despite having the largest market going through a really rough patch. I'd say that we would like to think, and we're heading into 2020 thinking that Ontario transportation will be better. We're hopeful of that, definitely. But there's a lot of moving parts in the Canadian market. Now we're hearing about -- and you've seen in the news the rail blockage. This is definitely not helpful. Now we have oil and gas, which last year was going very well, and now all of a sudden in Q4 things started to slow down again. So there are many moving parts. Am I hopeful for the country in the longer term? Absolutely. Our backlog is going up, and has gone up 7.5% year-over-year. So this is not di minimis. This is good news. But it's one thing to be awarded some projects, but we need to get started on them. So what I would say to you is I feel good about the Canadian market. I feel good about the long-term outlook of the Canadian market. But in the short term, it's very hard to predict how all of this will transpire. As I said, feeling better in 2020 than how we performed in '19, but I'm not prepared to tell you just yet that this is a slam dunk.
Okay. Perfect. And for the North East region in the U.S., could you maybe provide more color on the key elements that impacted organic growth in Q4 and also whether this translated to the performance for lower EBITDA margin as well?
Yes, this was a result of a number of things. One, I mentioned one very large client of WSP in '19 reduced fees as a result of some governor's decision for the state of New York last year. So definitely this impacted the top line and the bottom line for that matter. Also we saw in '19 fewer design [ builds ] in the region, so for a bit of time. And also what I would call probably self-inflicted actions that really reduced our organic growth in '19 was the fact that we're not as fast as we should have been off the gate in early '19 to hire and fill the open position that we had in the business in early '19. So I hope that this is not going to be a repeat in '20. And already I feel going into 2020 that we're feeling a lot better about this.
Okay. Perfect. And last one for me, Alex, could you talk maybe about the allegation with respect to Louis Berger, whether there's any update or where you are in the current process?
Look, we are reviewing this. I'm not going to comment anything more than what Isabelle commented in the comments that she provided to you. We have reviewed this. I'd say that for the time being, for us this is not something that is raising a high level of concern within the company. I'm going to leave it that. But I'm obviously not going to talk about our strategy over the phone. This is obviously confidential. But all that to tell you that we're not right now concerned by this.
Your next question comes from line of Chris Murray with AltaCorp.
Just very briefly, just looking at leverage levels, and Alex, I appreciate that you've talked a little bit about the fact that you're trying to maybe looking for some acquisitions and stuff like that. But in the absence of more acquisitions, you are sort of at the bottom end of your range. Just wondering, have you thought about maybe a balance between share buyback or something like that, just to maintain yourself around that 1x level, or do you feel like you actually have the ability with the pipeline to be able to hit some pretty big acquisition numbers to use that balance sheet?
Look, on acquisitions we don't have -- and hopefully, I mean I'm sorry if I'm using an expression that probably is not politically correct. But we haven't gone on our head on acquisitions. We're only going to do acquisitions if they make sense for the company, if they are timely, if they sit well within the strategy we have put together for the next 3 years. Do I feel that there is a good pipeline of potential acquisitions around the world for us to meet or exceed our ambitions? Yes, the answer is yes. And we're going to work extremely hard to achieve that. And that's why I don't feel compelled right now to talk to you about the share buyback. We have a good dividend. And this quarter we work closely with our 2 cornerstone investors. And given that we have now lower leverage, more cash, for instance one of our cornerstone investors reduced its DRIP participation by 50%. So I want you to know that we are monitoring our capital structure very carefully. We are working collaboratively with our cornerstone and all of our investors for that matter. And right now I don't believe we are in a position to -- and I feel the pipeline is so empty that we would contemplate a share buyback at this point in time.
Okay. Fair enough. And then you Alain, just I guess welcome to the CFO seat. Just looking at Q4, lots of kind of call it one-time adjustments in EPS and stuff like that. So we'll leave it at that. But as you sort of take the role now as financial leader of the company, any thoughts around anything that you're looking to accomplish specifically?
I think that generally speaking it's to continue the good work that has been done over the years. I mean it's continue to focus on EBITDA and strong cash flow conversion. And Bruno is leaving a good cash flow conversion, as you've seen. So my intention is to keep that focus on DSO and on EBITDA margin.
Your next question comes from the line of Michael Tupholme with TD Securities.
There was mention of starting to see some revenue synergies from Louis Berger. I'm just wondering if you can provide any further detail around that and if you've had some success now that you've completed that integration by the sounds of it, in terms of improving the cost structure, bringing that closer to your own U.S. cost structure.
Yes, Michael. We have seen a lot of good revenue synergies examples over the course of '19. I did mention some of them in the federal space over the course of '19. If you recall, the reason why I thought this acquisition was very strategic to us, WSP has a very strong design franchise in the U.S. Louis Berger was bringing a lot of bridge expertise, which we were lacking. But on top of it, they have also a strong master planning expertise that they are bringing to the table, and also port and marine. So I would tell you that we're very pleased with the way the acquisition evolved over the course of '19. We have worked very hard to streamline the operation, to bring them within the umbrella of WSP in the U.S., but also the Middle East. And the work that this is carrying into 2020 is, as we said before during the prior question, the restructuring of our Louis Berger International business, which we're going to be undertaking in 2020. But certainly '19, the plan was definitely to streamline the business in the U.S., but also the Middle East and Spain and in Panama; places that that we thought were quite strategic to our business.
Okay. Perfect. And then Alex, you've talked in the past and your plan is to increase the amount of strategic advisory services as a percentage of the company's revenue. And I just was wondering if you could provide a bit of an update on success on that front.
Well, exactly. I'm glad you're asking this question, Michael. In '19, we've increased our headcount globally by 18% in the environmental sector. Yes, they were smaller in size, the acquisitions that we completed. But you know what? It's slowly but surely we increased our headcount by over a thousand people in the environmental sector in '19. And this is obviously increasing the scope of advisory services that we can offer to our clients. So all in all, I think we made great progress. We're very focused on this. And I said that in our strategy that we would want to capitalize on our design expertise, and continue to capitalize on our expertise, but also to accelerate at a faster rate our advisory piece. And I think in '19 we did just that. I think we did increase our design in the building sector, especially in the health care sector. With the acquisition of Leach Wallace, we did increase our design capabilities. But I would say '19, we increased at a faster rate our advisory services and that's something that I wanted to achieve for the first year of the plan.
Okay. And then just lastly, you've talked about -- and this is not new. But you've talked for a little while this economic indicator suggesting a bit of a cooling off in the Nordics. Wondering if you can provide a little bit of an update on that region. And I guess in spite of the fact that you're still pointing to that cooling off, you are calling for low to mid-single-digit organic growth across the U.K. and the Nordics combined. So is the Nordics still looking positive in spite of that cooling off?
Well, perhaps it's worth me provide a bit of a -- just visibility in the regions, so that you can have a better view about how we're thinking about the regions. Let me start by saying South Africa, right now we are operating in poor economic climate. This is a tough region. Thankfully this is a very small region, and I think the team is working very hard. And again, they should be commended for the good work that they're doing in the tough environment. So this is obviously not helping when you consolidate the aggregate organic growth of the region. In the U.K., I think we've talked extensively about the nervousness of the market as it relates to Brexit, the election in December, and also we consumed a lot of good backlog in '19. If you look back at '18 and the work that was awarded to the U.K., I think we've done a great job at consuming and translating the backlog into revenue in '19. But now you look at the pipeline of opportunities in the U.K., and it's now up. And we're quite pleased about this. So this hopefully bodes well for the future. Then you look at EMEIA as a whole. Obviously the Middle East is a big piece of this. And clearly in Dubai there was a tightening of the real estate supply market and clearly also a slowdown in Dubai as a result of some projects for the Expo 2020 that were coming to completion in '19. But you know what? We pivoted in '19 from UAE to the KSA, by increasing in '19 our total revenue in KSA from 7% of our total revenue in the Middle East to 20%. So I think that's the reason why we performed better in the Middle East than we had anticipated in the first place in '19. And now finishing off with the Nordics, the Nordics it is true that the real estate market in the private sector has been cooling off. But it's not a cliff, and I wouldn't go as far as telling you that this is a cliff. There's a lot of projects being awarded in the public sector, and that's why we're feeling good about organic growth for the Nordics also in 2020. So that's just a review of the region and the way we consolidate the numbers. But all in all, I think the Middle East should be fine. The U.K. should also be fine, the Nordics also. And that's why we're signaling low to mid-single-digit growth for the region.
Your next question comes from the line of Devin Dodge with BMO Capital Markets.
Just want to come back to your APAC division. Organic growth there really strong in Q4. I think this was driven by Australia and New Zealand. Both of these have been strong markets for a while. Just, well then can you talk about the availability of labor in the local market to absorb this type of growth, or are you leveraging other pools of capacity across your network?
Well, that's the beauty of our network and our international firm. We are in the position to leverage the expertise wherever it's located. Clearly most of the work that we are conducting is very local. So clearly it's a very, very busy region for us. And we've done very well now for a few years, and we expect to continue to do very well in Australia and New Zealand in 2020. So yes, the war on talent frankly is not just in Asia Pacific. We have a similar issue in our very good markets such as the U.S., and in EMEIA and Canada. I mean finding a good pool of talent is obviously a challenge. And that's why I mean we continue to transform the organization and appeal to the younger generation, and create a different workplace environment and invest in training, because that's what young engineers want. And that's why we've been investing a lot of our money internally in developing our people.
Okay. That make sense. And just maybe to continue on that, how is utilization holding up, given the sustained high growth in the region?
Very high utilization, but manageable, I would say.
Okay. Excellent. And maybe a question for Alain, but your stock was up about 15% in Q4. I'm just wondering how much of an impact that had on your stock-based comp in the quarter.
Look, obviously the provision will increase as a result of it, clearly. But this is only for a quarter. And also you need to remember -- I'm not sure if we've disclosed that before. But we are hedging also some of that so that we are hopefully avoiding some volatility in the corporate cost and the [indiscernible] cost as a result of movement in the stock price of the company.
Your next question comes from the line of Frederic Bastien with Raymond James.
[Foreign Language] Guys, it's pretty obvious that you're hungry for scale in the environmental sector, based on the transactions you completed in the past 6 months. How many of those specialized companies would be on your target list right now? Are we talking about 3, 10, or potentially 50 companies?
Look, there are many, Fred. I'm not going to give a number on the call this morning. I don't think it's really a necessity. But I think there are many on our radar screen. We are clearly looking to diversify our platform. We're really looking to grow, and frankly not just in the environment sector. We're looking to grow in all sorts of advisory services from project program management to also water science, to all sorts of advisory services that we are providing right now already, but are looking to grow in scale. So clearly environment is clearly an area of focus for us. But it's not just that. But you look back at what we completed in terms of acquisitions last year, E&E was one, Ecology & Environment. And just recently we acquired LT Environmental out of Denver. This is probably the largest and the best firm in our opinion in the state of Colorado. So slowly but surely we are right now positioning WSP as a true environmental player and we will continue to do that in every country where we operate.
Okay. And if I go even further back and if I look at your 2 largest acquisitions, so they turned out to be homeruns, because they really created no overlap whatsoever. I mean the WSP deal was complementary from a geographical standpoint. You were only in Canada and I think WSP was in 30 countries. And then you look at PB, very complementary from a discipline standpoint. Now it gets harder and harder to find those gems, as you continue to get bigger and more diversified. So my question to you is how does that dynamic factor into your thinking when you evaluate a potentially bigger deal that would potentially introduce that kind of overlap?
Cautious, or at least the way I would answer this question, Fred, is if we would find a large acquisition that would create a lot of overlap from a discipline point of view, it's not something that we would want to do. I think as we grow as a company, we're truly going to still be looking at complementing our platform with acquisitions that will make us stronger as a result of it on a pro forma basis, would make us more resilient, more diversified and be the best in the markets in which we operate, both from geographical point of view, but also from an end markets point of view. It's true however, that as you grow and as we develop our platform in the markets where we already have a big presence, that you will see more cost synergies perhaps on the back office. And that's to be expected. But am I worried by it? Probably not. I actually see it as a real opportunity to strengthen the organization, to professionalize the firm, to import best practices and to get better as a result of it. And that's actually part of our plan. So no, we're not going to do acquisitions that will create a lot of cost cutting on the front office and the client-facing side. But it is true that as we grow as a company, if we acquire a large firm in the U.S., if we acquire a large firm in Canada, we acquire a large firm in the U.K.; that we will undeniably be having more cost synergies on the back office. Is that a problem? I actually don't see it as a problem. I see it as an advantage to get better in our regions.
There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to the presenters for closing remarks.
Well thank you for attending the Q4 2019 conference call. I realize this was a long call. But this was the year-end. So I look forward to updating you in the quarters to come and I wish you a great 2020 year. Thank you very much.
Bye, everyone.
Bye-bye.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.