Tourmaline Oil Corp
TSX:TOU
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
53.99
69.12
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Tourmaline Q1 2020 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Scott Kirker. Please go ahead.
Thanks, Christina . Thank you, operator. Welcome, everyone, to our discussion of Tourmaline Oil Corp's. results for the 3 months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020. I'm Scott Kirker, and I'm the General Counsel for Tourmaline. Before we get started, I refer you to the advisories on forward-looking statements contained in the news release as well as the advisories contained in the Tourmaline annual information form and our MD&A available on SEDAR and on our website. I would draw your attention to the material factors and assumptions in those advisories. I'm here with Mike Rose, Tourmaline's President and Chief Executive Officer; Brian Robinson, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer; and Jamie Heard, Tourmaline's Senior Capital Markets Analyst. We'll start by speaking to some of the highlights of the last quarter and our year so far. After Mike's remarks, we'll be open for questions. Go ahead, Mike.
Thank you, Scott, and good morning, everybody. Thank you for dialing in, and we're pleased to go through our first quarter results. So the highlights. First quarter cash flow was a record $629 million or $2.11 per fully diluted share. Tourmaline generated record free cash flow of $233.5 million in the first quarter, which was utilized to fund the dividend increase announced on March 10 and to reduce net debt by approximately $153 million in the quarter. First quarter '21 average production of a little over 411,000 BOEs per day was ahead of the upper range of the full year guidance of 390,000 to 410,000 BOEs per day. And first quarter liquids production was also ahead at approximately 92,000 barrels per day. Moving to some specifics on production. Driven by stronger-than-anticipated well performance, march production actually averaged just under 418,000 BOEs per day, and there were no storage withdrawal volumes or acquisition volumes in those totals. Given stronger production performance in all 3 operated complexes, second quarter '21 production of 400,000 to 405,000 BOEs per day is now anticipated from the base EP program. As is the case every year, second quarter '21 production will be impacted by planned pipeline maintenance and company planned turnarounds, which are incorporated into those guidance estimates. Second quarter production estimates also include the impact of injections in California and Dawn, which are expected to reduce quarterly production volumes by approximately 4,500 BOEs per day, and it's those same storage positions, which proved very valuable this past winter. Looking specifically at some of the financial results. First quarter cash flow was $629.3 million. That was 122% increase over the first quarter of 2020 and a 59% increase over the previous quarter's cash flow. First quarter '21 after-tax net earnings were a little under $248 million or $0.83 per fully diluted share. And that compares favorably to a net loss of just under $36 million in the first quarter of last year. Our full year '21 forecast cash flow remains at $2.2 billion, yielding approximately $1.1 billion of free cash flow for the full year. OpEx in Q1 '21 was $3.64 per BOE. The company is focused on further dropping operating costs by continuing to integrate the acquired Jupiter/Modern assets into the Deep Basin complex as well as ultimately reducing gas volumes going to third-party processing in the greater Gundy complex when the phase 2 plant expansion starts up. Some specifics on the capital program and the financial outlook. First quarter 2021 E&P capital spending was $385.7 million. We expanded $30 million on Gundy facility prebuilds in the first quarter. And that puts us now in a position to start-up the phase 2 deep cut expansion in early January 2022, and that's ahead of the original mid-Q2 2022 completion target. This would allow us to take advantage of potentially stronger winter 2022 natural gas pricing, similar to what just happened in this past winter. Do note that 75% of the Gundy Phase 2 expansion volumes will ultimately flow to Malin and PG&E hubs via incremental long-term transport on the GTN system that Tourmaline has secured. We will finalize timing for this 45,000 BOE per day project start-up as well as provide revised '21, '22 and 5-year planned guidance, reflecting both the impact of increased production volumes and improved strip pricing, and we'll do that during this quarter. Tourmaline did not complete any significant acquisitions during the first quarter. Net debt at March 31, '21 was $1.63 billion, and that's down 8.6% from exit 2020 net debt. And our plan is to continue to reduce debt during the year, and we're targeting a net debt to cash flow ratio at year-end of approximately 0.5x, and we are well on the way with that initiative. Also, during the first quarter, the company issued $250 million of senior unsecured notes at a very attractive fixed rate of 2.077% for 7 years. The most recent 5-year EP plan delivers free cash flow of $1.1 billion in '21 and $4.1 billion over the full 5 years of the plan. And the free cash flow will be utilized for further modest dividend increases, continued debt reduction, potential accretive acquisitions, select emission reduction and environmental performance improvement investments and potential tactical share buybacks. Looking at marketing. Our average realized natural gas price in the first quarter was CAD 3.86 per Mcf, as we benefited from both hedging and the company's broad market diversification portfolio that extends throughout North America. Natural gas fundamentals for '21 and '22 continue to improve. Approximately 55% of our natural gas volumes are exposed to spot prices in markets on the Western half of the continent, those being PG&E, Malin, Sumas, Station 2 and AECO. And those are the hubs where the fundamentals continue to be most supportive for pricing. Completion of the ongoing NGTL build out and ultimately, Canadian West Coast LNG are expected to further strengthen pricing at these hubs. 95% of our PG&E deliveries continue to remain unhedged through '21, and that's a market where fundamentals remain very, very strong. NGL realizations in the first quarter were up 141% over the first quarter of 2020 and are expected to further strengthen through the balance of the year, and we are the largest NGL producer in Canada. A brief EP update. We operated 12 drilling rigs during the first quarter, and we're currently operating 4 rigs through spring breakup. Well performance in all 3 complexes has on average exceeded expectations, driving the stronger production performance that we realized in March and April. We drilled 1 Montney pad this winter in the Laprise-Conroy area in Northeast B.C. on the lands acquired in 2020 from Polar Star. The Laprise 5-well pad tested at a combined final total productive capacity of a little over 45 million a day and just under 4,000 barrels per day of condensate. And that's after a 3-day per well flow test. And obviously, that was ahead of expectation. Average completed well cost for this initial quite remote pad were $3.9 million per well, and we do expect further drill complete capital costs of approximately $3.5 million per well or less with further drilling time optimization and stimulated well cost reduction via centralization of our frac water facility. Deep Basin production reached a record in early April of this year, a little over 261,000 BOEs per day, driven in part by stronger-than-forecast performance on the acquired Jupiter/Modern assets. That deal, as you recall, was done in Q4 of 2020. So some of the details are enclosed, and I won't read them. Of note, drilling costs on the Jupiter lands have averaged 43% less. Since we took the property over, completion costs have averaged 50% less and equipping costs are down 70%. So a big win there. In our environmental performance improvement business, the company has expanded the significant ongoing diesel displacement initiatives into the well stimulation EP business segment. We entered into a joint venture with Trican Well Service Ltd. to construct and utilize Canada's first low-emission gas-powered frac fleet, and we'll be using that prior to year-end in the Gundy complex. We continue to expand our water management initiatives, which reduce emissions. They save capital costs, and they significantly reduce freshwater usage. We now have 37 water facilities spread across the 3 core complexes, including 8 produced water storage and recycling hubs. And some highlights are listed there, and they include a series of industry firsts in the overall water management business. And I think that's it for the formal comments, and we're more than willing to answer questions that you might have.
[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Patrick O'Rourke with ATB Capital.
So I think one of the things that really stood out for me in the release was the very, very strong results at Conroy. I know you guys noted it as a flow test. Just wondering are those wells currently tied in? And then in the deck, you talk about Conroy Phase 1 and Phase 2. Phase 2 is more of a Gundy style development. Just curious what would be entailed as of right now in Phase 1, which is more right in front of us than Phase 2, which is a little bit further out?
Sure. As far as that pad initially -- well, the pads tied in, there was only room for 3 of the first 5 wells to start with. I think they're all on now. And all of that data is actually in the public domain. And so they've been very strong with very strong condensate rates, and they've been maintained. Conroy Phase 1 is really optimizing on Polar Star and Chinook and reducing OpEx, delineation drilling to ascertain how inexpensively we can drill these pads in advance of a big ramp up. And yes, you're right, Gundy style facility. And right now, our timing for that is kind of it's coeval with LNG Canada start-up because we're mindful not to grow basin supply. So when that extra pull of gas left happens, we think prices are going to be very strong. We're going to need to supply, and that's the right time to build Conroy -- the big deep cut at Conroy.
Okay. Great. And then the other thing that really stood out to me in the release was the improvements that you guys have been able to make on the capital cost on the Jupiter acquired assets to be able to drop them by, call it, 50% in a matter of months. What's the real driver there? And how durable is that? Are you guys building in any potential inflation going forward in the basin here?
It's all about our drilling and completion kind of engineering, well design and execution. So those reductions on a per well basis will certainly be maintained. And in our 5-year plan, we do build in 2.5% per annum inflation, and we actually always have. And so we think we've put in the appropriate contingency for potential cost increases over the next 12 months.
And is that turning it out to be reflective of what you're seeing in the market when you're looking further out? I know there's been inflation in some of the input costs for the service companies like hot rolled steel and things of that nature. That's a pretty solid number to go with right now that 2.5%?
Yes. We think it's reasonable. I mean those negotiations and repricing are kind of going on right now.
And your next question comes from the line of Fai Lee with Odlum Brown.
You mentioned the potential tactical share buybacks. I'm just wondering how you're thinking about that. You shares look pretty cheap compared to how much cash flow you're generating. And it appears to have the Board has been detailing a lot lower free cash flow yields. Just wondering how you're thinking about share buybacks and like do you have the certain debt targets that you want to reach before you initiate this year buybacks? Or how are you thinking about that?
Sure. Well, the order that we listed on is probably the priority. And our priority this year is the modest sustainable dividend increases or increase. We did do one in the first quarter and the debt reduction. So I think you're on to it, let us reduce that debt over the next 2 or 3 quarters, get it down to 0.5x debt to cash flow or less and then we could revisit some of the other priorities on the list.
Okay. And just a follow-up. How do you see the acquisition market compared to like the return to get back from a share buyback? Or like how are you thinking about that at this point, given current market conditions for acquisitions?
Well, I mean, those are economic comparisons we would always make, what is the best use of capital. We do see the M&A market as still strong as far as the pipeline of opportunities, costs have come up somewhat depending what and where you're looking. So we monitor that and continue to make those economic comparisons across all the potential use of incremental capital that we have.
And you have no further questions at this time.
Well, thanks, everybody. We talk to you next quarter.
This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect.