MEG Energy Corp
TSX:MEG
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
23.01
33.43
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning. My name
is Pam, and
I'll
be
your
conference
operator
today.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
welcome
everyone
to
the
MEG
Energy's
2021
Year-End
Results
Conference
Call.
All
lines
have been
placed
on
mute
to
prevent
any
background
noise.
After
the
speakers'
remarks,
there'll be
a
question-and-answer
session.
[Operator Instructions]
Thank
you.
I
would
now
like
to
turn
the
conference
over
to
Mr.
Derek
Evans,
CEO.
Please
go
ahead.
Thank
you,
Pam.
Good
morning
and
thank
you
for
joining
us to
review
MEG
Energy's
year-end
2021
operating
and
financial
results.
In
the
room
with
me
this
morning are
Eric
Toews, our
Chief
Financial
Officer;
Lyle
Yuzdepski,
our
General
Counsel
and
Corporate
Secretary;
and Darlene
Gates,
our
Chief
Operating
Officer.
I'd
like
to
remind
our
listeners
that
this
call
contains
forward-looking
information.
Please
refer
to
the
advisories
in
our
disclosure
documents
filed
on
SEDAR
and
on
our
website.
I'll
keep
my
remarks
brief
today
and
refer
listeners
to
yesterday's
press
releases
for
more
detail.
MEG
continues
its
priority
of
maintaining
safe
and
reliable
operations
as
we
work
within
the
ongoing
COVID-19
environment.
Our
teams
continue
to
respond
to
the
impacts
of
the
pandemic,
prioritizing
the
health
and
safety
of
our
workforce
and
reliable
operations
at
our
Christina
Lake
facility.
I'm
proud
to
say
that
we
had
no
lost
time
incidents
for
our
employees
or
contractors
in
2021,
a
testament
to
the
dedication
and
diligence
of
our
team.
We
exited
the
year
with
strong
financial
and
operational
results.
Our
team's
focus
on
safety,
plant
reliability,
steam
utilization,
and
ongoing
well optimization
have
contributed
to
MEG's
strong
2021
results.
Highlights
from
our
year-end
results
include:
adjusted
funds
flow
of CAD
799
million
or
CAD
2.57
per
share
for
the
year;
record
free
cash
flow
of
CAD
468
million
in
2021;
we
completed
or
announced
the
repayment
of
$325
million
of
outstanding
indebtedness;
record
bitumen
production
volumes
for
the
fourth
quarter
of
100,698
barrels
per
day
as
well
as
for
the
full
year
of
93,733
barrels
per
day.
Total
capital
expenditures
of
CAD 331
million,
approximately
2%
lower
than
the
July
2021
increased
budget,
were
primarily
directed
towards
sustaining
and
maintenance
activities
and
additional
drilling
to
return
bitumen
production
to
100,000
barrels
a
day.
Net
operating
costs
averaged
CAD
6.60
per
barrel,
including
record
low
non-energy
operating
costs
of
CAD
4.24
per
barrel.
Power
revenue
offset
energy
operating
costs
by
approximately
52%.
We
released
our
second
ESG
report
with
a
new
2030
greenhouse
gas
intensity
target
to
complement
our
2050
net
zero
greenhouse
gas
target
and
improved
alignment
on
disclosure
of
climate-related
risks
with
SASB
and
TCFD
guidance.
MEG
realized
an average
AWB
blend
sales
price
of
$57.59
per
barrel
during
2021
compared
to
$28.07
per
barrel
in
2020.
The
increase
in
the
average
AWB
blend
sales
price
year-over-year
was
primarily
a
result
of
the
average
WTI
price
increase
of
$28.51
per
barrel.
MEG
sold
42%
of
its
sales
volumes
in
the
premium
priced
US
Gulf
Coast
market
in
2021
compared
to
40%
in
2020.
MEG
invested CAD
331
million
of
capital
in
2021
compared
to
CAD
149
million
in
2020.
Majority
of the
capital
was
focused
on
sustaining
and
maintenance
activities
as
well
as
incremental
well
capital
to
fully
utilize
the
Christina
Lake's
oil
processing
capacity
of
100,000
barrels
per
day.
As
we
disclosed
last
year,
the
total
investment
for
this
initiative
is
approximately
CAD 125
million,
of
which CAD
50
million
is
being
invested
in
the
first
half
of
2022.
MEG
expects
full
facility
utilization
in
the
second
half
of
2022
post
our
planned
turnaround
in
Q2
of
this
year.
I'm
proud
of the
efforts
and
the
advancements
in
our
ESG
activities
from
our
teams
across
the
organization.
In
June
2021,
MEG
along
with
four
other
oil
sands
operators,
created
the
Oil
Sands
Pathways
to
Net
Zero
Alliance
with
the
objective
to
achieve
net zero
emissions
from
our
operations
by
2050.
In
the
fall,
a
sixth
company
joined
the
alliance,
which
now
represents
approximately
95%
of
operated
Canadian
oil
sands
production.
Our
collective
purpose
is
to
position
Canada
as
the
preferred
global
supplier
of
net zero
crude.
Pathways'
vision
is
anchored
by
a
major
carbon
capture
and
storage
system
with
a
CO2
pipeline
connecting
oil
sands
facilities
from
Fort
McMurray
and
the
surrounding
region
to
a
carbon
sequestration
hub
near
Cold
Lake.
We
continue
to
work
with
the
federal
and
Alberta
governments
in
support
of
this
emissions-reduction
project
and
infrastructure
as
well
as
advancing
development
of
new
and
emerging
technologies.
2021
also
saw
the
release
of
our
second
ESG
report,
which
outlines
the
meaningful
progress
we've
made
in
our
priority
topics:
climate
change and
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
water
and
wastewater
management,
health
and
safety,
and
indigenous
relations.
In
addition,
the
report
contains
our
new
2030
greenhouse
gas
intensity
target
that
complements
our
2050
net
zero
target
and
improved
alignment
on
climate-related
risks
with
SASB
and
TCFD
guidance. The
report
is
available
on
our
website
at
www.megenergy.com,
and
I
really
encourage
listeners
to
take
the
opportunity
to
read
it
in
some
detail.
It's
a
fabulous
report.
As
we
exit
2021,
MEG
is
well-positioned
to
continue
to
deliver
on
its
deleveraging
and
shareholder
return
strategy.
Yesterday,
MEG
issued
a
notice
to
redeem
the
remaining
$171
million
of
MEG's
outstanding
6.5%
senior
secured
second
lien
notes
due
January
2025.
This
brings
MEG's
total
debt
repayment
to
approximately
$2 billion
since
the
beginning
of
2018.
Continued
debt
reduction
remains
a
core
focus
of
the
company.
As
MEG
expects
to
soon
reach
its
previously
announced
near-term
debt
target
of
$1.7
billion,
yesterday,
MEG's
board
of
directors
approved
the
filing
of
an
application
to
allow
MEG
to
initiate
a
share
buyback
program,
whereby
10%
of
the
corporation's
public
float
may
be
brought
back
– bought
back
up
to
a
maximum
of
approximately
27.2
million
common
shares
of
MEG.
MEG
intends
to
allocate
25%
of
free
cash
flow
generated
to
share
buybacks,
with
the
remainder
being
allocated
to
debt
reduction.
Once
MEG
reaches
its
$1.2
billion
net
debt
target,
the
corporation
intends
to
increase
the
percentage
of
free
cash
flow
allocated
to
share
buybacks
to
approximately
50%,
with
the
remainder
being
applied
to
further
debt
reduction.
In
closing,
we
continue
to
enhance
our
competitive
position
with
our
work
on
several
priorities,
including
our
debt
repayment
and
shareholder
return
strategy,
plant
optimization
and
reliability,
cost
management,
and
advancement
of
our
ESG-related
activities.
I'm
pleased
with
the
more
favorable
outlook
for
commodity
prices
as
well
as
the
ongoing
global
recovery
from
the
impact
of
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
I
want
to
extend
my
thanks
to
our
team
for
their
performance
and
contributions
to
our
success
in
2021.
I'm
proud
of
what
we've
been
able
to
accomplish
and
confident
in
our
future
and
our
commitment
to
sustainable,
innovative,
and
responsible
energy
development.
With
that,
I'll
now
turn
the
call
to
our
operator
to
begin
the
Q&A.
Thank
you.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
we
will
now
begin
the
question-and-answer
session.
[Operator Instructions]
Your
first
question
comes
from
Phil
Gresh
with
JPMorgan.
Please
go
ahead.
Yeah.
Hey.
Good
morning,
Derek.
And
thanks
for
taking
the
questions.
First
one
just
on
the
takeaway
situation
for
2022.
Can
you
give
us
any
updated
thoughts
on
your
ability
to
use
the
full
contracted
amount
as
the
year
progresses?
Absolutely.
Phil,
I
think
you're
referring
to
our
Flanagan
South
Seaway
capacity.
I
think
we
fully
expect
to
be
able
to
use
the
majority
of
that
95%
of
that
throughout
the
year,
primarily
driven
by
the
fact
that
the
Enbridge
apportionment
we
expect
to
see
in
that
sort
of
0%
range
through
the
summer
and
maybe
a
little
bit
of
maybe
5%
apportionment
in
some
of
the
shoulder
seasons.
But
effectively,
we're
going
to
have
a full
access
to
that
capacity
now.
Got
it.
So
even
here
in
the
first
quarter,
you
feel
comfortable
with
that?
Well,
I
mean,
apportionment
was
higher
in
January
and
February.
But
I
mean,
March's
apportionment,
I
believe,
is
zero.
And
we
fully
expect
that
to
continue
as
we
drive
forward
now.
Got
it.
Okay.
Good
to
hear.
And
then
any
updated
thoughts
around
the
timing
of
moving
to
post payout
in
this
type
of
macro
environment?
Obviously,
it's
extremely
volatile
right
now,
but
just
curious
how
you
would
frame
the
way
we
should
think
about
that?
Yeah.
Phil, it's
Eric.
Probably
the
best
way to
think
about
that
is
to
think
about
the
effect
of
royalty
rates
for
2022
and
2023,
so at
the
prices
we're
seeing
today,
the
oil
prices
we're
seeing
today.
And
as
you
know,
like,
there's
a
bunch
of
factors
that
go
into
calculating
the
payout,
oil
prices, diluent
costs,
foreign
exchange,
capital,
all
that
needs
to
be put
in to
determine
payout
timing.
But
the
effect
of royalty
rates
we're
seeing
for
2022
is
probably
in the
10%
to
15%
range.
And
then
we'd
see
that –
at
current
pricing, we'd
see
that
going
to
20%
to
25%
for
2023.
So
that's
probably
the
best
way
for
us
to
frame
that
for
you.
Okay.
Perfect.
Thank
you.
I'll
turn
it
over.
Thanks,
Phil.
Your
next
question
comes
from
Neil
Mehta
with
Goldman
Sachs.
Please
go
ahead.
Hey.
Good
morning.
This
is
Nicolette
Slusser
on
for
Neil
Mehta.
Thanks
for
taking
the
time.
So
the
first
would
just
be
on
costs.
Non-energy
OpEx
continues
to come
in
lower
versus
our
estimates
and
also in
recent
guidance.
How
should
we
be
thinking
about
non-energy
OpEx
going
forward?
And
is
it
safe
to
say
the
fourth
quarter's
non-energy
OpEx
per
barrel
could
be
used
as
a
sort
of
run
rate?
Great
question.
I
think,
after
six
years
of
continuing
to
reduce
our
non-energy
OpEx,
I
think
this
is
the
year
where
due
to
inflationary
pressures,
pressures
on
labor,
pressures
on
fuel,
pressures
on
services,
we
could
see
that
start
to
move
up.
Obviously,
we'll
continue
to
focus
on
that.
But
I
think
the
guidance
we've
got
out
there
includes
all
of
those
impacts.
So
I
think
our
guidance
range
is
probably
the
best
view
of
where
we
think
non-energy
OpEx
costs
are
going
to
be
on
a
go-forward
basis.
Okay.
Great.
That's
helpful.
Thank
you.
And
then
the
follow-up,
we're
just
curious
on
your
outlook
for
WTI/WCS
this
year
as
global
demand
for
Canada
heavy
crude
may
pick
up
and
with
Line
3
on
line.
And
then
in
the
medium
term,
how
are
you
thinking
about
differentials
following
the
recent
announcement
to
bring
TMX
on
line
in
3Q
2023?
Thanks.
So
it's
interesting.
Obviously,
there's
a
lot
of
focus
on
where
WTI
today
is.
But
the
second
part
of
your
question,
I
think,
is
the
really
interesting
one
is
where
do
we
see
differentials.
I
mean,
today,
differentials
are
trading
in the
US
Gulf
Coast
for
WCS
or
AWB
in
that
CAD 2
to
CAD 3
range,
which
is
showing
the
tremendous
demand,
worldwide
demand
for
this
product.
And
obviously,
with
some
of
the
challenges
that
we're
seeing
in
terms
of
energy
supply
coming
out
of
Europe,
we
expect
to
see
very
low
WCS/AWB
differentials
on
a
go-forward
basis.
Obviously,
we
can't
predict
where
WTI
prices
are
going.
But
we
do
believe
that
if
we
look
at
sort
of
the
amount
of
underinvestment
in
the
global
oil
and
gas
business
and
the
continued
focus
of
investors
on
return
of
capital
and
no
growth
from
oil
and
gas
companies,
we
think
this
is
going
to
create
an
environment
where
you're
going
to
see
much –
you're
going
to
see
strong
WTI
prices
for
an
extended
period
of time.
Great.
Thanks
for
the
color.
Thank
you.
[Operator Instructions]
Your
next
question
comes
from
Patrick
O'Rourke
with
ATB
Capital.
Please
go
ahead.
Hey.
Good morning,
guys. Thanks
for
taking
my
questions.
Just
looking
at
the
net
debt
target
and
the
NCIB
that
you're
putting
in
place,
our
model
kind
of
has
it
you
getting
to
that
$1.7
billion
threshold
at
some
point
in
Q2.
But
is
it
safe
to
assume
that
as
soon
as
you
get
the
approval
here,
you
can
start
executing
on
that?
I
guess
the
way
that
we're
thinking
about
that,
Patrick,
is
we
want to
make
sure
we
have
the
cash in
the
door
before
we
start
doing
buybacks.
So
you
should
expect
to
see
us
start
that
very
soon.
But
we
want to
make
sure
that
we
have
all
the
cash
in
the
door
after
redeeming
the
second
lien
notes
we
announced
yesterday.
But
we'll
start
it
as
quickly
as
we
can
when
the
cash
is
in
the
door.
Okay.
And
then
a
little
bit
of
an
improvement
on
the
SOR
in
the
quarter
relative
to
Q3
here.
Wondering
after
coming
out
of
the
turnaround
here
and
you
get
to
the
steady
state
nameplate
capacity,
how
you
guys
see
the
SOR
trending
going
forward
here.
I
think
the
– Patrick,
it's
Derek.
Obviously,
the
steam-oil
ratio
is
a
function
of
where
we
put
the
steam
to
work
and
what
stage
in
maturity
the
wells
are
at.
So
part
of the
reason
you
saw
the
steam-oil
ratio
coming
down
in the
last
part
of
the
year
is
we
were
bringing
new
well
pairs
on,
well
pairs
that
we had
been
steaming
and
warming
up,
but
not
actually
seeing
the
production
from.
So
I
think
you'll –
should
expect
to
see
that,
that
steam-oil
ratio
over
the
year
will
continue
to
come
down
gradually.
Okay.
And
then
just
one
last
sort
of
final
question
for
me.
In
terms
of
time lines
for
the
Pathways
project, it's
something
that's
–
the
Pathway
is
really
intriguing
for
us,
and
I
think
a
lot
of
investors
out
there,
especially
in
terms
of
the
oil
sands
story.
Can
you
maybe
give
us
an
outlook
for
sort
of
the
timing
when
we
could
see
sort
of
more
material
news
on
this
project?
Absolutely.
Listen,
the
Pathways
project
is
exciting
on
a
bunch
of
different
fronts.
Not
only
is
it
really
Canada's
only
big
project
to
help
meet
its
2030
aspirations
to
reduce
its
greenhouse
gas
emissions,
Pathways
project
represents
obviously
10%
of
Canada's
emissions.
And
we're
excited
to
be
able
to
get
that
potentially
up
and
running
sooner
than
later.
With
respect
to
your
question,
we
are
currently
awaiting
some
news
on
the
investment
tax
credit,
which
we
hope
will
be
in
the
next
federal
budget.
And
that
will
provide
us
with
some
clarity
on
the
important
financial
support
that
we
need
to
undertake
this
project.
The
other
part
of
this,
though,
that
is
equally
and
as
important
is
the
pore
space application.
So
we
are
very
interested
in
getting
our
pore
space
application
in
with
the
province
of
Alberta
for
that
area
around
Cold
Lake
area.
I
saw
something
come
out
yesterday
that
said
there
was
an
opportunity
or
there
were
requests
for
proposals
on
that
front
that
has
sort
of
a
May
deadline
and
a
October-type
of
timeframe
with
respect
to
when
we
potentially
could
find
out, but
we'll
work
on
that.
But
those
are
sort
of
the
two
key
deadlines
we're
working
with
at
the
moment,
when
could
we
see
some
sort
of
indication
of
federal
support
and
when
could
we
achieve
some
sort
of
certainty
with
respect
to
pore
space
in
the
Cold
Lake
area.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you,
Patrick.
Your
next
question
comes
from
Dennis
Fong
with
CIBC
World
Markets.
Please
go
ahead.
Hi.
Good
morning.
And
thanks
for
taking
my
question.
The
first
one
that
I
have
here
is just
with
respect
to
the
term
notes.
You've
obviously
now
retired
your
– well,
soon
to
have
retired
the
entire
6.5%
senior
secured
second
lien.
How
should
we
be
thinking
about
the
next
tranche,
the
2027,
as
well
as
just
kind
of
expectations
around
capital
allocation
policies
and
maybe
ideal
capital
structure?
Thanks.
I guess, I'll
take
the
second
question
first,
which
is
the
capital
allocation
strategy.
I
don't
think –
we've
been
very
clear
on
the
allocation
of
free
cash
flow
to
buybacks
and
to
debt
reduction,
and
that
the
$1.2
billion,
we
take
that
to
50/50.
So
we
don't
see
that
changing.
We
see,
obviously,
the
trading
value
of MEG
shares
is
well
below
the
intrinsic
value.
So
until
that
fundamentally
changes,
you
won't
see
us
change
our
strategy
around
that.
With
respect
to
the
optimum
capital
structure,
we're
going
to continue
to
pay
down
debt
once
we
hit
that
$1.2
billion.
And
the
$1.2
billion
was
less
than
2
times
at
a $50
WTI
price.
We
want to
get
that
lower.
How
much
lower,
we'll
determine
that
as
we
get
to
that
$1.2
billion
level.
And
then
the
first
question
–
sorry,
can
you
repeat
the
first
question?
Just
about
the
$1.2
billion
of
term
notes
for
2027...
Yes.
Sorry.
Yeah.
...
[indiscernible]
(00:20:16)
generate
free
cash.
Yeah.
Sorry,
Dennis.
Thanks.
Yeah.
We're
thinking
about
that
the
same way
we
thought
about
attacking
the
second liens
a
few
years
ago,
which
is
we'll
look
at
the
tranches,
which debt
we
buy
back
based
on
things
like
liquidity,
tenor,
price,
the
economics
to
it.
So we
have
a
plan
around
that,
and
we'll
execute
that
shortly.
Great.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Dennis.
Your
next
question
comes
from
Menno
Hulshof
with
TD
Securities.
Please
go
ahead.
Thanks.
Good
morning,
everyone.
Just
one
question
for
me,
just
a
follow-up
on
shareholder
returns.
You're
clearly
about
to
get
really
aggressive
on
the
buyback.
But
what
are
your
current
thoughts
on
why
reinstatement
of
a
base
dividend
isn't
a
priority?
Yeah.
Well, the –
but
from
our
perspective,
the
buybacks,
that
generates
fundamental
value
for
shareholders. It's
demonstrable.
All
else
being
equal,
the
cash
flow
per
share
shrinks
as
the
– or
grows,
sorry,
as
the
outstanding
shares
shrink.
And
you've got to
remember,
we're
still
in
a
deleveraging
mode
here
at
MEG.
So
from
our
perspective,
that
strategy
is
somewhat
incompatible
with
a
fixed
charge
dividend
at
this
point
in time.
So
that's
the
reason
why
we
gravitate
towards
the
buybacks.
So
potentially,
we
can
start
to
think
about
that
in
2023
or
even
further
out?
Yeah. I
wouldn't
say
that.
We'll
decide
that
at
the
time.
But
right
now,
our
approach
is
buybacks.
We
think
that's
the
best
approach
for
shareholders.
And
we'll
determine
whether
we
change
that
once
we
get
through
the
$1.2
billion
target.
Perfect.
Thank
you.
And Menno, I
would
just
add.
I
mean,
we
continue
to look
at
the
intrinsic
value
of
the
shares,
and
we
still
think
the
best
strategy
given
our
high
leverage
is
to
continue
to
buy
back
those
shares.
I
mean,
I'll
be
quite
honest,
our
concern
with
dividends
is
people
see
it
as
a
fixed
part
of
your
cost
structure.
And
we've
got
to
reduce
–
we
need
to
reduce
our
debt
before
we
start
talking
about
adding
anything
else
to
our
cost
structure.
Got
it.
That
all makes
a
lot
of
sense.
Thanks,
guys.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Menno.
There
are
no
further
questions
at
this
time.
Please
proceed.
Well,
thank
you,
everyone,
for
joining
us
for
the
call
today.
Appreciate
the
time
you've
given
us
to
let
us
update
you
on
our
story.
We
appreciate
your
questions,
and
we
appreciate
your
continued
support.
Thank
you,
and
have
a
great
day.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
this
concludes
your
conference
call
for
today.
We
thank
you
for
participating,
and
ask
that
you
please
disconnect
your
lines.
Have
a
great
day.