Docebo Inc
TSX:DCBO
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
46.88
74.08
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Docebo Inc
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Docebo Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I'd now like to turn the call over to Docebo's Vice President of Investor Relations, Mike McCarthy. Please go ahead, Mike.
Thank you, Regina. Earlier this morning, Docebo issued its Q3 2024 results. The press release, which included a link to management's prepared remarks and our quarterly investor slide deck were all posted to our Investor Relations website. This morning's call will allow participants to ask questions about our results and the written commentary that management provided this morning.
Before we begin this morning's Q&A, Docebo would like to remind listeners that certain information discussed may be forward-looking in nature. Such forward-looking information reflects the company's current views with respect to future events. Any such information is subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For more information on the risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to forward-looking statements, please refer to Docebo's public filings, which are available on SEDAR and EDGAR.
During the call, we will reference certain non-IFRS financial measures. Although we believe these measures provide useful supplemental information about our financial performance, they are not recognized measures and do not have standardized meanings under IFRS. Please see our MD&A for additional information regarding our non-IFRS financial measures, including reconciliations to the nearest IFRS measures. Please note that unless otherwise stated, all references to any financial figures are in U.S. dollars.
Now I'd like to turn the call over to Docebo's CEO, Alessio Artuffo; and our CFO, Sukaran Mehta.
Regina, we're ready to take the first question.
Our first question will come from the line of Ryan MacDonald with Needham.
Alessio, maybe just to start with you. Obviously, the macro environment has been a tough one, but Docebo seems to continue to execute really well despite that. Can you just talk a little bit about what you're seeing sort of within the selling environment? What's enabled the company to continue to sort of really perform well, again, as things sort of continue to be elongated? And maybe talk about sort of the mix between sort of sales productivity from the direct team versus maybe support you continue to get as you expand those partner relationships?
100% Ryan. So first, let me say, I am really, really proud of the efforts of the Docebo team and how we've effectively been executing in what remains a stable yet somewhat challenging macro environment. Customers, for sure, continue to demonstrate appreciation for our services, for our products, in particular, our ability to serve multiple use cases remains our superpower. We are the sole company that can serve at scale, a large enterprises needs for both their employee experience or EX and the customer partner experience, what we refer to as more CX.
You are correct that our efforts are balanced and target both investing in our direct sales machine as well as our partner engine, which is an articulated engine where system integrators play a key role. This quarter alone, we have advanced our success with some of the system integrators. For example, in partnership with Accenture, we were able to conclude positively a relationship with a leader in the insurance sector in Europe, actually, which to me, underscores the fact that our investments in partnerships and our investments in establishing our presence in our go-to-market even outside of North America, in this particular case, it was in the DACH region are paying off and our strategy is coming together really nicely.
In terms of go-to-market more broadly, with the cutting of rates, we're seeing a resurgence of the sectors in which we have been historically very, very productive, such as software, professional services and other sectors where our products suits them really well, for example, associations and retail is really performing really nicely in these industries.
Look, in the enterprise space, no doubt, the deal cycle remains slightly elongated. So we are learning how to work within that environment. But again, overall, let me underscore, we have performed in alignment with our expectations and are very proud of our results.
Appreciate all the color there. Maybe as a follow-up, in a week like this, it's probably impossible not to ask about anything government related, but it seems like it was a good quarter on, in the slide and a bit of the Fed. But can you just give us a little bit of an update on the progress with FedRAMP? And is there any risk here as a new administration comes in that there's, I guess, maybe a pausing in the process as you work towards that FedRAMP certification?
Love the question. So let me touch first on the topic of new administration and then give you an update on where we stand relative to FedRAMP. What I've always loved about our technology is that especially at times of, say, a research for efficiency and cost cutting, what better technology is available than that, that allows organizations to upskill their own workforce.
There is nothing more important than having people on the job or customers by any means that are more competent and more ready to do the work at a fraction of the time. So our platform essentially does that. It supports upskilling and reskilling processes. And so -- we understand government agencies may be asked to do more with less. And we believe that in this environment, our products provide a natural hedge against a search for increased efficiency. So that is on the more new administration side. Of course, it's early days, and we will see what happens next.
On the FedRAMP side, our work has continued just upfront kind of to remember where we stand in our journey of certification. Docebo, first of all, is audit ready. And what that means is we have done all our work on the so-called FedRAMP controls to ensure that our technology processes and documentation are ready for a sponsor relationship.
We have been working, are working very actively, and this remains a top priority to finalize a sponsor relationship. And we remain cautiously optimistic by that. However, putting a date to that is basically impossible as this is outside of our control. However, we are cautiously optimistic on the outcome.
One more thing I would like to say about this. Let me remind that while FedRAMP is a priority, and we have invested on it, we are seeing beautiful outcomes more broadly in the government space, where we are executing very nicely in the SLED part of the business and are partnering with partners like Deloitte on advancing our positioning in the market and are selling actively together with them.
Our next question will come from the line of Suthan Sukumar with Stifel.
Congrats on a solid quarter here. I just wanted to check in on an update on your pricing strategy. Just curious how, what early progress you've been seeing to date? And what is some initial feedback you can share on sort of, on the success side of that strategy?
Sukaran here. I'll cover this one. First, yes, just as a reminder, when we launched our pricing in April, this is, historically, the company priced its customers on an a la carte basis, and we moved to what we call the core bundle pricing with incremental capabilities that are part of our core and more package. So what that effectively has meant is that, in terms of the trends we're seeing, we're certainly driving a much higher value conversation of the problem that we want to solve for our customer in terms of the outcomes that we help solve for them, whether it's the customer education, onboarding capabilities, so on and so forth.
And what we also drive as a result of that is aligning value to where we can extract value effectively, meaning that in the customer education use cases, we are able to have a conversation around e-commerce capabilities, which we can monetize separately as part of our new packages. And so the new pricing has allowed our sales engine to drive a conversation which is value driven. We're certainly seeing that all our new deals effectively now are priced at the new price book. As we look through 2025, you'll expect us to start utilizing that price book for our renewal cycle. With the new products that we, sorry, the new modules that were launched at Docebo Inspire, it also gives us an opportunity to utilize our new price book to streamline the renewal book over time.
It will still take time because the renewal book depends on when the customer is renewing, and you also have to be sensitive to their initial contract SLAs. But in general, on the net new deals, we're pretty pleased with it. You should expect that, and you're seeing that in the ACV growth, even this quarter that we showed ACV was quite strong at $71,000. I mean, we've talked about it in the past that you can expect there's a reasonable increase in ACV as a result of how we go to market. The other thing that we're seeing also is that it increases, it helps us from a deal velocity perspective because from an objection handling perspective, you're now driving the conversation of value versus a la carte menu of items. So very pleased on that front. And then I think looking forward to 2025, you'll see us utilize that with our new modules and expansion strategy in trying to bring as many customers as possible to the new price book.
For my second question, I just want to follow up on the U.S. government opportunity. I noticed recently in the headlines, one of your partners, Carahsoft has, is being investigated by the FBI. Just wondering, has there been any -- have you noticed any impact to your relationship or/and any impact on execution via that channel?
No. This is one of our several partners in the government sector. We don't expect any impact in our relationship. And yes, we'll continue to monitor developments, but it's pretty neutral to us.
Our next question will come from the line of Robert Young with Canaccord Genuity.
First place, I'd like to start is a couple of times you've given us some indication on growth by cohort. I think you said that the enterprise cohort is growing 30% or greater at the Investor Day. Can you update us on that? And maybe just give us a sense of where the different cohorts are?
Yes. Rob, so Sukaran here. In terms of the cohorts, I think you might, you will see that in my prepared remarks, I mentioned it. So you'd see enterprise segment, which is our customers and the large end of the market, we grew that segment at 25% this quarter. And then we saw some, on the SMB side, I think it's pretty similar to what we've seen in the past, but mostly in the single digits growth. But I think as we look forward, you can expect that even in Q4 and forward that you see more strength in the higher end of the market. And as we'll continue to monitoring how the rate environment impacts the lower end of the market, but there is an opportunity or potential that if there's some stabilization and confidence in the buyer, maybe the SMB market may perhaps start participating a bit more in 2025.
Okay. So then I guess the obvious follow-on is, I mean, 25% is a downtick. So what would be the driver there? Is that tempers, are those long-term expectations? Just maybe give a little more detail there.
Yes. It's just generally a seasonally -- we think about Q3 is a seasonally slower quarter. Last year, also just as a reminder, Rob, we had a large deal, Google, that was part of our marquee deal. So that there's a bit of a comp in the prior year, too.
Our next question will come from the line of Josh Baer with Morgan Stanley.
Congrats on a strong quarter. I was hoping to get an update on just the OEM strategy broadly. And also wondering, as we head into '25, are we going to start to see any headwinds show up from some of those prior changes around Ceridian and Dayforce?
Our partner strategy continues to be very strong. As we mentioned in the past, we brought on board a new executive to lead our strategic partnership efforts that includes our OEM channel . When we think about partnerships, we think about OEM, we think about system integrators, and we think about partnerships that are accretive from a go-to-market standpoint in terms of product capabilities and in terms of product extensions.
So we've been at work on all these fronts and are quite pleased with our return on the business development side. I believe, in the quarters to come, we will continue to expand our wallet of significant partners, and we will update you as we go through it. But I would say from a results standpoint, our focus has been to support these large enterprises that we're working with. And really, the relationship with the SIs has been a tremendous area of focus for us and the developments with the Accenture and Deloitte have taken a lot of our time, but we believe this time is very well spent and with great ROI.
And I think, Joshua, the second part of your question, my apologies, there was another around pricing.
No, I think that's helpful. But Sukaran, I would ask you just to -- not to guide, but maybe the opportunity to help shape analysts' thoughts on growth trajectory ahead. Like on the one hand, you have 18% ARR growth this quarter. On the other, you guided to 14% revenue growth in Q4. Is there a reason to expect stabilization in '25 from a growth perspective, more deceleration from that Q4 exit rate? Like any thoughts on the trajectory there?
No. Josh, I can give some color. I think, as you know, we'll provide our annual guidance for 2025 when we report in February. But I think the way to shape it first is, qualitatively, is that the focus in 2025 will be coming from a perspective of enterprise segment being the most important, especially on the external use cases, customer experience use cases. Alessio spoke about some investments that we're making around, not just FedRAMP around our SLED market, and that's important as we look into 2025 with a bit of delay perhaps on the FedRAMP that we just spoke about.
But the pipeline, the way it's shaping right now is that more than 50% of our pipeline is CX learning driven. Almost 30% of our pipeline going into 2025 is also participating from an SI perspective, which speaks to the larger end of the market. So, we certainly are increasing our pipeline in the larger end of the market, and that will certainly increase some deal cycles, but also give us an opportunity to show some strength into 2025. At a high level, I think that as we exit this year, we'll provide more guidance, but there's an opportunity to us to continue to maintain some growth as we look into 2025.
Our next question will come from the line of Richard Tse with National Bank Financial.
It's sort of along the similar question. Can you maybe help us understand how the sales and marketing organization is structured or organized in sort of the different markets you're pursuing? So you've got large enterprise, you have sort of small/mid. Are they kind of all under the same group? Do they have different groups? Like I'm just trying to understand the mechanics of how that works.
Sure. So, the setup is international markets is primarily driven by the countries. So relative to international markets, we have the concept of regional allocations, whether it's U.K., Nordics, France, Benelux, South EMEA, APAC or Asia Pacific region, and DACH region, where we're seeing, by the way, great results to date. And with regards to our biggest market opportunity in North America, where, of course, we don't have the complexity of dealing with multiple languages and multiple cultures, our design is pretty straightforward and I would say, typical where we have our business development organization that works to expand and grow our funnel in alignment with our revenue marketing function.
These are the organizations that really filling in our funnel with combined GTM activities. And then on the sales execution side, those are in charge of actually winning the deals are account executives, account managers and global account directors that specialize in working through the pipeline. And they are set up by segment, where our primary segments are the mid-market segment and the enterprise segment, the ones that we are the most focused on. And as a support unit, we have an organization of partnerships that works around the sales organization to support our sales efforts by bringing in new partners, educating partners and supporting the sales team on partner execution.
And then we have vertical initiatives. The one vertical initiative that we have began more than a year ago has been our government effort, which runs as its unit given the specific GTM of government and the skill set required both in SLED and FED. And as we continue to grow, our organization will continue to evolve. There are different moments in the life of the company with different strategies, and those strategies typically reflect the growth in the sales, seeking more efficiency that's always our priority and focusing our spend and efforts where we believe there is a higher chance of winning, where we have higher win rates and higher commission.
Okay. And my second question. When you look at the sort of the feature set you have, it seems to me that one of the most prominent is around kind of AI authoring and helping create content. Is that what you feel from your customers you speak to and is that the biggest pain point? And from a cost perspective, how much does that actually help them save in terms of using something like AI authoring? And what is the margin profile on something like that [indiscernible]?
Yes, brilliant question. So let me preface by saying AI offering is set to launch later this month, actually in 11 days. And so at this point, we don't have, let's say, an already live use case with AI offering with customer proof point of results that we can report. However, let me share a few thoughts. Number one, AI offering was the most participated beta program in the history of the company. There has been a tremendous amount of interest, which confirms your input that it is a highly sought after technology. AI offering is the evolution of Docebo Shape, a module that we've launched years ago that we have reshaped to meet the better the needs of customers.
AI offering is going to be an important part of our users, not just per se for the return of investment, which is going to be quite simple, frankly, to quantify once we are paying customers on it because it's quite simple to demonstrate our content production cycle that tends to be very heavy on the cost side can be streamlined and automated thanks to AI. We're equally excited about products, frankly, that we have launched and where we are seeing return in the market. In the past few months, we've launched respectively insight, which is our advanced analytics technology that helps enterprises really power a BI technology within the LMS and run very complex yet streamlined reporting needs and communities, which plays into our CX, customer experience posture and allows companies to run a community interactive within the LMS.
We have deep conviction in this too, and we have sold units and dollars in accordance with our ambitious plans and expectations on both. I will say back to AI offering that one of the reasons why I'm super excited about it is not just the capabilities to create content, but I view it as an integral part of our future vision of the company that focuses on learning and knowledge transformation because knowledge is going to be the #1 asset that every company has available and transforming knowledge into instruction and into learning is going to be the big opportunity. Offering is the glue that allows us to connect the knowledge to transforming it in instruction and learning. And that is just a component of what will be the Docebo powerhouse of the future.
Our next question will come from the line of Aaron Kyle with CIBC.
It's Aaron Kyle on for Stephanie Price. In your prepared remarks, you called out partnerships with those offering services complementary to LMS. Could you just dig into that strategy a bit more? And you talked about buy, build and partner. Is that also the way you would order those in terms of priority?
For sure, we see a tremendous opportunity in the market. Part of our vision is to become a more holistic partner to our customers. And it's not just our vision. That's what our customers are asking us to be better at. In 2015, when we listened carefully to the market as a much smaller company, we listened to customers said to us, we'd like to do more with an LMS than just delivering the training for our employees.
We listened to that feedback back then. We made a conscious bet in our product, and we developed the CX capabilities, and that remains to date, our best investment because it has allowed us to gain market share that most LMS players did not see for many years to come. Similarly, our idea of listening to customers and listening to their needs of doing more is a good partner today. We want to solve more problems for our customers because the learning tech stack is very fragmented.
Enterprises are known to have contracts in place with dozens of providers to solve what fundamentally is a comprehensive learning need for various types of audiences in the organization. So of course, in an ideal world, if all things were possible, we would step our fingers and have all these capabilities at hand from day 1 tomorrow, but that's not the way it works.
And the way it works is we will prioritize building where we have deep conviction and high synergies with our products. We will continue to partner where we think there are assets that are synergic and that we can establish product integrations with commercial alliances attached. And why not? We will capture opportunities inorganically in the market for technologies and we focus on very healthy quality assets that we can leverage our cash to buy and improve our market position with that.
Okay. That's helpful color there. And then maybe I just have a modeling question.
I meant to say, Aaron, I apologize.
That's okay. That's okay. My other question is just on the modeling front. The free cash flow, it was a bit lower than we had expected in the quarter. And I see that's working capital driven and impacted by the timing of some payments and some bonuses. My question is, is that a seasonality thing? Like should we be modeling Q3 as a negative change in working capital going forward? Or how should I think about that?
Yes. Good question, Aaron. Sukaran here. Yes, this is just first and foremost, like I've said before, when you look at our free cash flow on a trailing 12-month basis or on an annualized basis, you'll always find our free cash flow will be, give or take, plus or minus 1% to adjusted EBITDA. What you're pointing out is, yes, it's just basically, our annual bonuses are now paid semiannually. So that's just something you should just factor in as you going forward from a free cash flow perspective. But on a trailing 12-month basis, there's no difference.
Our next question comes from the line of Daniel Chan with TD Cowen.
As you wait for FedRAMP certification, what's your confidence that you're going to be able to participate in some of the large RFPs that are coming to market? You mentioned that the Veteran Affairs RFP came out around your Inspire conference. So what's your level of confidence you're going to be able to participate in these large opportunities?
Look, this is a great question. I would say the reason why we are so focused on our FedRAMP certification is that the TAM for the federal market is so impressive. C participation opportunities will be tied to achieving our FedRAMP status, and that's why that's our priority. the TAM for the federal market we reverted is in excess of $1 billion opportunity in our market alone. And so it goes without saying that the sooner we accomplish our certification, the better we will be positioned to respond to these bids and when they come out.
Yes. I think, Dan, the only thing Alessio spoke earlier, there was a similar question that I had is, I think as you look at the infrastructure within the government organizations, we spoke about it, I think, at Inspire bit, but you will find that these are organizations that are sitting on very legacy old solutions that have to be modernized just because they can't even sustain their current operational practices, forget about the advancements in technology that happened over the last 20 years. So a lot of the solutions that some of these agencies are utilizing today have been built on Moodle and legacy platforms that are just not sustainable to even operate.
And as you look at what Alessio just spoke about, the potential and looking for efficiencies in the government, technology is going to be an important factor in terms of solving that productivity efficiency that might be a focus as we look forward to the new administration.
Switching gears, new logo ACV came in flat at about $71,000. Just wondering whether this is a level we should expect the ACV to stabilize at or whether there are levers to take that higher?
Yes. Yes, good question, Don. Yes, we were pleased with actually the strength we showed in Q3, which is seasonally a slower quarter. But what you're seeing is that as we move upmarket, the pipeline is also increasing upmarket, but that's also showing in terms of the ACV strength even in Q3. I think, yes, look, going forward, it is the way the pipeline also is shaping and generally how we go to market from a mid-market and large enterprise perspective.
And with the changes we've made in the pricing, you can expect that we should show some consistent strength in terms of the size of the deals. We are landing. But as we said, it's a story of segments, too. And so if you think about the segments that we've had historically, the more and more you move away from SMB into the mid-market and enterprise, you should see us continue to show strength and hopefully increase this steadily in the next few quarters.
Our next question comes from the line of Kevin Krishnaratne with Scotiabank.
I joined a bit late, so apologies if this has been asked. But for can you comment on your ARR book trend so far through Q4 relative maybe to last year? And can we expect typically, you see a pretty good bump in Q4, sort of like $12 million, I think, the last couple of quarters. Do we expect something that trend to continue? Or is there something else going on? Because in your script, you talked about elevated levels of scrutiny for the foreseeable future. Just any color you can give us on what you're seeing?
Yes, Kevin, the way to think about firstly, I'll say that our pipeline, as you understand, is mostly heavily in these quarters and future quarters in the mid-market and large enterprise as we are driving a pretty high pipeline in that in those segments. And the commentary that we provided just to kind of highlight that some of these deals, they are taking longer, but we're seeing our execution consistently improve. As we guided for Q4, we will provide the next year's guidance when we kind of report February.
But as we uplifted our guidance for revenue, you'll see that we're pretty comfortable in terms of our 2024 targets. And as we look into 2025 and what that bookings will come as a result of our Q4 quarter, we'll provide that highlight in early 2025. But generally, the way to think about it is going forward is that the mix of the business is meaningfully in the large enterprise cycle, and that certainly is a factor in terms of when and how we close some amount of those deals. And that should also be hopefully an opportunity to maintain our growth as we look forward and potentially show some improvements in our ACV.
And our next question comes from the line of Martin Toner with ATB Capital Markets.
Just wondering, in the prepared remarks, you used the term improving pipeline. Just you've talked a little bit about it over the course of the call, but just wondered if you could just revisit and give us a little more depth into why you put that into the prepared remarks.
Yes. It's a story of focus, Martin, focus of our engine that I have described before where there was a question prior about organizational setup. And we have, over time, continued to learn operationally how to allocate our resources and efforts in a more narrow way where we are focused. This is no easy task when for many, many years, we were operating across the SMB, mid-market and enterprise space. We have continued to adjust our business development motion, marketing motion, both in the form of paid and nonpaid marketing and branded campaigns towards a more focused mid-market and enterprise outcome, which in return will have resulted in marginal improvements in the pipeline because our units are bigger and because the customer profile is more in line with what we're looking for.
I would add to that, that one of the tactics that we are implementing more and more is the so-called ABM approach where we are putting quite a bit of effort in strategic revenue analysis of our top-performing industries and verticals and carving our territories accordingly across the board from demand to execution. Again, that is with the objective of creating better unit economics in terms of cost for sure, but also in terms of improved pipeline. So we're pleased with those efforts. I believe that we have a long way to grow more. I believe that we have an even greater opportunity. And as we continue to launch new products and establish new partnerships and increase our addressable market as a result, the opportunity ahead of us is really exciting.
I'm going to be in Atlanta soon, so I'm going to hit you for some restaurant reco.
Our next question will come from the line of Kiran Sritharan with Eight Capital.
Congratulations on the quarter. Now with yourself as CEO Alessio and a recently promoted CRO, there's obviously been some shuffling in senior leadership this year. I wanted to ask you broadly on any structural tweaks you've made that's seeing results? And also, can you give an update on what your hiring priorities are across different teams into next year?
For sure. Well, look, first of all, I am honored and super excited to be in the permanent CEO position, and I am so grateful to the team that I work with closely every day, whoever the champion, and for play to our Board and investors for the trust they put in me. In terms of decisions and people, you're right to think that one of my top priorities is a focus on people. People more broadly as the champions, every employee of the company, but for sure, assembling the 8 players team that I work with every day. In the first few months from my appointment, I was very happy to welcome to the business a few new executives, a new Chief of Staff, Noel Miller, a new EVP of Corporate Development and Partnerships, Travis Burke, more recently, a new SVP in Product Management with Andrea Sanvitto, and very critical to our go-to-market execution, a new Chief Marketing Officer, Alex Asnovich.
Is there more to come? Look, we're always looking to improve our organization. We're always looking for areas where we can do things better. And so I'm really proud of the team that we've assembled, but we're never happy, never good enough, and we look for opportunities to strengthen ourselves, both in people, products and services.
Appreciate the color there. And then my second, can you discuss the new communities product and how adoption and feedback has been since that launch? And more broadly, how your appetite of kit for M&A has changed given that growing meaningful free cash flow you mentioned?
Absolutely. Great questions. Communities. Communities have me really excited. As you may have learned over time in the earnings call, we've always been very enthusiast, so to speak of our CX posture, meaning our ability to serve our customers to enable their own customers, partners, and external audiences. Communities is a result of a small acquisition that we did of a company called PeerBoard that had a, I would say, start-up product focused on the community business. We took the technology and the talent that was also high quality and brought it in the fold in Docebo and continue to develop, and we've recently released the communities product. The beta involved dozens of customers at Docebo, all showing great signs of engagement during the beta program.
One of the things that communities excites me tremendously is that whilst its main focus is one of addressing the needs of external audiences, we found in the market that there are many organizations that actually want to implement communities for their own internal use case as well. So not only it's going to be accretive for us as intended for the customer experience use case, it will also give us an opportunity to further strengthen and differentiate our EX or employee experience capabilities. Now further, I will tell you one thing that -- it's very factual. We have several thousand customers of Docebo interacting every day with our own community technology.
Our desire is to continue to drink our own champagne to show to our customers, our prospects, how Docebo leverages and makes a company better using a community technology. We have here now victory of doing that. We have developed best practices. So not only we've developed the product communities that is strong, but we also have the expertise to go out there in the market and showcase how we've actually implemented and you have a really good return on it by having that.
On the M&A front, we are, first of all, I would say job #1 is a very clear thesis. A very clear thesis of where we want to go, what we want to do, when, and under what circumstances. That to me is job #1. It's part of drawing a very clear vision for our company, which we believe we have very crystal clear.
M&A are a tool at our disposal. Our financial profile is elite. We are positioned really well with no debt and very healthy cash on the balance sheet and more importantly, an EBITDA profile and free cash flow profile that supports M&A efforts now in the future. We are active in the market. We look for opportunities, but we're very selective. The opportunities we're looking for are accretive to our story. They are value creation for our customers and the companies we are interested in as a positive to neutral profile to our existing balance sheet.
But again, more important, they have to be good technologies and healthy businesses. So we are at work. Travis Burke is a professional that has done this for many years. He supports us in this effort. And we will see. We will keep updated as things evolve, but we're very excited.
That will conclude our question-and-answer session. And I'll now turn the call over to Alessio for closing remarks.
Thank you very much. We are really pleased to report another successful quarter marked by consistent execution and profitability. We are in a trajectory to become the complete AI-driven learning and knowledge platform used by enterprises for their end-to-end learning needs. The world will learn with the channel. This position will increase our TAM and strengthen our position of innovative and differentiated company. Thank you for your time. We look forward to updating you when we report Q4 results in February. Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude today's meeting. Thank you all for joining, and you may now disconnect.