Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
TSX:CHP.UN
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
12.418
15.24
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q3-2024 Analysis
Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust
In Q3 2024, Choice Properties delivered robust financial results, achieving a Funds From Operations (FFO) of $186.7 million, translating to $0.258 per unit. This represents a 3.2% increase compared to the same period last year. Notably, this growth stems from higher same-asset net operating income (NOI) and contributions from completed development projects, despite dealing with higher interest costs and some nonrecurring items.
The company maintained a healthy occupancy rate of 97.7% across its portfolio. Noteworthy is the industrial segment, where occupancy slightly declined to 98.1%, as the company works through lease expirations and renewals.
Choice Properties reported a year-over-year same-asset cash NOI growth of 3%. The retail segment performed well with a 1.2% increase due to higher base rents and improved leasing activities, while the industrial segment saw a more significant increase of 11.7%, driven largely by new leasing activities. This performance continues the trend seen year to date and contributes positively to the company's outlook.
During the quarter, Choice Properties completed significant transactions amounting to $172 million, with $130 million allocated to acquisitions. A notable acquisition includes a three-building portfolio from Loblaw for approximately $129 million, enhancing the company’s position in the retail sector with long-term leases averaging 15 to 20 years and 2% annual growth. Such acquisitions are bolstered by strong relationships with key partners.
Looking ahead, the company remains confident in its 2024 financial outlook, revisiting guidance for same-asset NOI growth. Current expectations suggest a final growth rate sitting at the higher end of the 2.5% to 3% range established previously, reflecting management’s careful assessment of ongoing performance and market conditions.
Choice Properties has noted a persistent demand for retail spaces, particularly from necessity-based tenants, amid national expansion strategies. The company achieved impressive leasing spreads of 15.3%, reinforcing its robust negotiation capabilities and proactive asset management strategies. There’s an expected stabilization in industrial occupancy, with efforts focused on retaining existing tenants and filling available spaces.
The company’s financial health is solid, with a debt-to-EBITDA ratio standing at 7x, indicative of its conservative capital management policies. Choice Properties has maintained a fully undrawn $1.5 billion corporate facility, ensuring ample liquidity. The stable financial metrics position the company well to adapt to market shifts while continuing to pursue growth through both acquisitions and internal developments.
As part of a strategic succession plan, Mario Barrafato will retire early next year, with Erin Johnston being promoted to CFO. This transition underscores the company's commitment to maintaining its operational integrity and enhancing shareholder value through effective management continuity.
Thank you for standing by. My name is Briana, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. Please note that this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions]
I will now turn the conference over to Erin Johnston, Senior VP of Finance. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to Choice Properties Q3 2024 Conference Call. I'm joined here this morning by Rael Diamond, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mario Barrafato, Chief Financial Officer; and Niall Collins, Chief Operating Officer.
Rael will start the call today by providing a brief recap of our third quarter performance as well as our transaction and development activity in the quarter. Niall will discuss our operational results, followed by Mario, who will conclude the call with a review of our financial results before we open the lines for Q&A.
Before we begin today's call, I would like to remind you that by discussing our financial and operating performance and in responding to your questions, we may make forward-looking statements, including statements regarding Choice Properties' objectives, strategies to achieve those objectives as well as statements with respect to management's beliefs, plans, estimates, intentions, outlook and similar statements concerning anticipated future events, results, circumstances, performance or exceptions that are not historical facts. These statements are based on our current estimates and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the conclusions in these forward-looking statements.
Additional information on the material risks that can impact our financial results and estimates and the assumptions that were made in applying in making these statements can be found in the recently filed Q3 2024 financial statements and management discussion and analysis, which are available on the website and on SEDAR.
And with that, I will turn the call over to Rael.
Thank you, Erin, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to our Q3 conference call. We are pleased with our third quarter results, once again delivering strong operational and financial results driven by increasing demand from retail tenants by necessary based neighborhood centers and strong leasing for spreads in our industrial portfolio.
Our occupancy remained high at 97.7%. We achieved strong leasing spreads of 15.3% and delivered same asset cash NOI growth of 3%. As expected, FFO growth of 3.2% for the quarter was impacted by the timing of lease termination income and certain onetime costs related to our continued focus on operational efficiency, which we spoke about last quarter.
Our results reflect the quality of our portfolio and our team's ability to consistently deliver on our strategic priorities. Fundamentals across our asset classes remain strong. Our leasing team is seeing strong demand for retail space across the country, a trend we expect to continue, especially from necessity-based and discount-focused tenants. These tenants are actively seeking opportunities to expand their store networks across the country.
Our extensive footprint of grocery-anchored neighborhood centers is ideally positioned to support their growth plans. In our industrial portfolio, we continue to benefit from leasing spreads as our low in-place rents adjust to market rents. Despite the industrial market undergoing a period of adjustment, our portfolio centered on high-quality generic industrial assets remains attractive to a diverse range of tenants.
In addition, we are seeing strong leasing interest for the future phases of our development and Choice Caledon Business Park, thanks to our location, competitive land cost and access to services, including power. This quarter, we saw long-term bond yields fall and stabilized, creating more certainty over the asset valuations, which led to renewed optimism and an increase in transaction activity. However, the recent rise in long-term rates highlights ongoing market volatility.
Irrespective of the environment, we remain on track to deliver on our balanced capital recycling program for the year. In the quarter, we completed $172 million in total real estate transactions, which included approximately $130 million of acquisitions and $42 million of dispositions.
Our most significant transaction in the quarter was the acquisition of a 3-building portfolio from Loblaw for approximately $129 million at our 50% share. The acquisition was completed as part of a 50-50 joint venture with Crest Point. Choice will act as the property manager of the portfolio, which includes 1 distribution center and 2 retail properties. The distribution center is a 711,000 square foot Shoppers Drug Mart facility located in Mississauga, Ontario. The 2 retail assets include a Real Canadian Superstore in Winnipeg and a strata title interest in the other floors of 16 Carlson Street in Toronto, formerly Maple Leaf Gardens.
Originally constructed in 1931 this iconic building was the home of the Toronto Maple Leafs until 1999, but now houses 95,000 square feet of retail space, including a flagship Loblaw grocery store and LCBO outlet a Joe Fresh location and 150 underground parking spaces. Toronto Metropolitan University retains its ownership of the top level of the property, which houses the Madamey Atheletic center.
The 2 Toronto assets, including the distribution center and retail store represents approximately 85% of the rent of the 3 property portfolio acquisition. Compared with the transaction, the properties were leased back to Loblaw with lease terms between 15 and 20 years with 2% annual growth.
This transaction not only adds 3 high-quality assets to portfolio, but also demonstrates the benefit of our strategic relationship with Loblaw and the strength of our relationships with our third-party partners. Our disposition activity for the quarter included the sale of 2 retail assets at Power center Quebec City and another retail asset adjacent to Choices Power center Mississauga for total proceeds of approximately $42 million.
Our team also continued to advance our development pipeline in the quarter. We transferred approximately 41,000 square feet of commercial GLA through retail intensifications. These projects focus on adding at-grade retail density to our existing neighborhood centers. We expect our retail intensification pipeline to continue to add value to our retail portfolio and provide steady cash flow growth.
For Industrial development, we remain on track to deliver the first phase of Choice Caledon Business Park in the fourth quarter of this year with cash recommencing in the first quarter of 2025. In addition, during the quarter, we broke ground on the second phase of this development, which includes a fulfillment facility leased to a national logistics provider.
Before I turn the call over to Niall, I want to acknowledge our recent announcement that Mario will be retiring in early 2025. As you know, Mario is one of the most trusted and respected CFOs in Canadian Real Estate, we've been at the helm with me for many years and played an important part in shaping our business.
Mario was instrumental in building and maintaining our industry-leading balance sheet and a first-class finance function. His commitment, strategic insights and leadership that help propel Choice into an industry leader. As part of our total succession plan, we are pleased to announce that Erin Johnston will be promoted to Chief Financial Officer effective March 1 of '25. Over the last 3 years, Erin has demonstrated her strong financial and strategic capabilities and has made a significant positive impact on our organization. She's a very capable executive and has the full support of our leadership team and our Board as she prepares to succeed Mario in the CFO role.
Erin and Mario have worked closely over the past 3 years, and this partnership will continue in the months ahead as Mario formally transitioned his responsibilities to Erin.
With that, I'll pass the call over to Niall to discuss our operational results. Niall?
Thank you, Rael, and good morning, everyone. As Rael mentioned, our portfolio continued to deliver stable and consistent cash flow growth. We ended the third quarter with stable occupancy at 97.7%. During the quarter, we had approximately 4 million square feet of these expiries. We reviewed 3.8 million square feet, achieving a 94% tenant redemption.
These renewals were completed at an average rent spread of 15.3%. We also completed 79,000 square feet of new leasing, which offset negative absorption of 178,000 square feet, mainly driven by 153,000 square feet of vacancies in the industrial segment.
In our retail portfolio, occupancy remained stable at 97.6%. During the quarter, 3.2 million square feet expired of which we renewed 3.1 million square feet for a 97.2% tenant retention rate. These renewable spreads averaged 7.5% of expiring rents including 2.7 million square feet of Loblaw renewals. Excluding Loblaw renewals, our leasing spreads averaged 10.7% above expiring rents with strong growth across all retail categories. We also completed 60,000 square feet of new retail leasing in the quarter, with lease commencements in 2025 at an average of 22% higher rents than previous tenants.
This largely offsets 88,000 square feet of expiries that did not renew in the quarter. For the remainder of 2024, we continue to expect strong leasing spreads consistent with the year-to-date. Demand from necessity-based tenants remain strong as retailers continue to seek out space. Our retail team -- our team continues to be proactive in lease negotiations and is working to reposition vacant space across our portfolio to drive growth through new leases.
During the third quarter, we generated $4.9 million in lease surrender revenue. The majority of this was the continuation of our rightsizing program at Loblaw, generating $4.5 million to lease surrender revenue at our grocery store in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia. These rightsizing opportunities create value for our properties by adding complementary third-party tenants at higher rents while continuing the productivity of the existing grocery store in a smaller footprint.
The remaining $400,000 of surrender revenue came from 2 isolated retail tenants. We continue to have very few tenants on our watch list with high demand for retail space and strong occupancy rate. It's expected that as space becomes available, we can back to a minimal downtime.
In our industrial portfolio, occupancy was down 70 bps to 98.1% compared to last quarter. We had 804,000 square feet of expiries and renewed 635,000 square feet for retention of 79%. Lease renewal spreads remained strong and averaged 92% above average -- above expiry. This was largely driven by 327,000 square feet of renewals in Ontario at spreads of 153.6%.
We also completed approximately 16,000 square feet of new leasing. The small occupancy decline in the quarter was expected and was primarily due to 58,000 square feet of vacancies in the GTA and 68,000 square feet in Alberta.
Our team is actively working on releasing the space. We expected industrial occupancy to decline marginally in Q4 with vacant space being released and occupancy improving in 2025. We continue to have embedded rental growth in our industrial portfolio with average in-place rents up $9.68 at the end of the quarter. Finally, our mixed-use and retail portfolio is also performing well, but occupancy remaining stable at 94.7%.
I will now pass it over to Mario to discuss our financial performance.
Thank you, Niall, and good morning, everyone. We are pleased with our financial performance in the third quarter. Our business continues to deliver stable and consistent growth.
Our reported funds from operations for the third quarter was $186.7 million or $0.258 per unit. This was a typical quarter. However, FFO in the quarter was impacted by certain nonrecurring items and timing differences year-over-year. Our third quarter results included lease surrender income of $4.9 million, offset by a $3.3 million temporary increase in G&A, primarily related to our outsourced project, which we noted last quarter.
These 2 items account for a positive net impact in the quarter of $1.6 million. On a per unit diluted basis, our reported third quarter FFO of $0.258 per unit reflects an increase of approximately 3.2% from the third quarter of 2023. This increase was primarily due to higher same-asset NOI and net FFO contributions from completed developments partially offset by higher interest costs.
Now turning to our properties. Same-asset cash NOI increased by $7 million or 3% compared to the third quarter of 2023 as a result of strong leasing activity. By asset class, retail same-asset cash NOI increased by $2.1 million or 1.2%. This increase was primarily driven by higher base rent from contractual rent steps, renewals, new leasing and higher recovery income. The year-over-year growth rate was impacted by negative adjustments in the current year and positive adjustments in the prior year related to final billings.
Adjusted for the impact of these timing differences, same asset cash NOI increased by $3.7 million or 2%. Industrial same asset cash NOI increased by approximately $4.6 million or 11.7%, this increase was primarily due to higher base rent from leasing activity, new leasing and higher capital recoveries. The mixed use in residential same-asset NOI -- cash NOI increased by approximately $200,000 or 2.6% and largely driven by higher rental rates at our GTA residential assets.
Now turning to our balance sheet. Our IFRS NAV for the quarter was $14.04 per unit, an increase of $177 million or 1.8% over last quarter. Our NAV growth was driven by a contribution of $39 million from operations, a fair value gain of $83 million on our investment properties and a fair value gain of $58 million in our investment in the units of Allied Properties where we are required in direct for us to mark-to-market this investment to its trading price at each quarter period end.
Our fair value gain on investment properties in the quarter was primarily driven by cash flow growth and cap rate adjustments in the retail portfolio. In our retail portfolio, we recorded a fair value gain related to cash flow growth and slight compression in cap rates. The value of our industrial portfolio was relatively flat as fair value gains generated from cash flow growth as maturing leases roll to market were largely offset by slight cap rate expansion on certain assets.
Now turning to our financial -- financing activities. We continue to take a prudent approach to capital management, and we benefit from the stability provided by our industry-leading balance sheet. We ended the quarter in solid financial position with strong debt metrics and ample liquidity. Our debt-to-EBITDA ratio was 7x, and we continue to maintain a fully undrawn $1.5 billion corporate facility and this is further supported by approximately $12.9 billion of unencumbered properties.
During the quarter, we repaid the $550 million Series-K unsecured debenture upon maturity which was primarily funded by the issuance of the $500 million Series-U, senior unsecured debenture in May of this year, which had a rate of 5.03% and a term of approximately 7 years. Proceeds from this issuance were invested in a fixed-rate GIC earning 5.5% until the proceeds were applied to our Series-K in September. As a result, our interest income and interest expense were both higher in the quarter.
Moving to secured finance activity. During the quarter, we funded a $43.5 million at share CMHC insured takeout mortgage at our recently completed Element development in the West for neighborhood of Ottawa. The project qualified for the MLI select lending program in bears interest at 4.02% with a term of 10.2 years. Additionally, we completed a series of mortgage financings to fund the acquisition of the 3 properties acquired with Crestpoint. The mortgages totaled approximately $82 million at share and a weighted average rate of approximately 4.8% in a term of 10 years. And at the end of Q3, we had 1 remaining mortgage maturing for the year of approximately $60 million and subsequent to quarter end, we successfully executed our debt financing for total proceeds of $80 million at an all-in rate of 4.7% and a term of 10 years.
We have no remaining maturities for 2024 and are well positioned to turn our attention to our 2025 capital requirements. So overall, this was once again a very solid quarter. And given the strength of our performance year-to-date, we remain confident in our ability to deliver on our 2024 financial outlook.
And with that, Rael, Erin and I would be glad to answer your questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Sam Damiani with TD Cowen.
I just want to start off by offering a well-deserved congratulations to both Mario and Erin. So all the best, Mario and Erin, well done. Maybe first question, just on the population growth, immigration growth curtailments announced a couple of weeks back. Rael, what's your view on the impact just generally on the market and specifically on Choice's vast pipeline of future residential development here in Toronto.
Sam, look, we still have -- our view that Canada still has a significant housing short -- shortage and short-term supply cannot keep pace with the demand. So our view is that as a long-term owner of real estate, we are going to continue to build residential when the returns make sense. And we are hopeful we can commence construction over the next 12 months because we see significant pent-up demand over the long term.
That's helpful. And do you see impact on rents for the types of product that the Choice would mostly be involved in building?
Look, I'll say 2 things. So firstly, we are seeing a slight softening in rents in -- primarily in the GTA, but is primarily a result of new condo supply coming online, which is competing against our purpose-built rental. And then the second thing I would say is that we've always been very conservative in our modeling for new developments. And we see lots of performers out there where groups would model significant, significant rent increases. We wouldn't model rent increases that would be much different than inflation when we are running our pro forma.
So I would say I would say that we're still very bullish on the prospects because we're realistic on our assumptions.
Okay, that makes sense. And last 1 for me is just on the retail side. certainly interesting to see cap rates start to come down a little bit. Curious what drove that. But sort of bigger picture, just wondering if just given the fundamentals that Choice and many others are seeing, is there really becoming an opportunity to build new retail space on spec in some scale. Is that opportunity starting to come into focus?
Sam, I'll take the first part. Right now, a lot of the movements are actually coming from appraisals, they're not more relevant before there wasn't a lot of comps. And so now we're getting new data on market rents, discount rates, terminal cap rates and so that's what's really reflecting the adjustment. We also have the ability to step rent. So -- so we're seeing those values go up. It's been a few quarters in a row now. So that's it on the valuation part, Rael, I'll turn it over to Rael for the second part.
Yes. Look, Sam, I would say that we've been adding acreage retail for many, many quarters in addition to, call it, the anchor we see ourselves continue to do that. Our big competitive advantage is that we work closely with Loblaw and try and help them with their store growth plans. And right now, we're working on 26 potential locations with Loblaw. Some of those would be new ground of developments but most of those would be at-grade retail where we're adding a shoppers drug mart and even some instances actually a new grocery store to an unanchored grocery center.
So that's all work on at the moment, but I think we're going to keep planning with Loblaw, and we hopefully can keep out into that pipeline.
Our next question comes from the line of Mark Rothschild with Canaccord Genuity.
Maybe just starting with the guidance for same asset NOI cash basis for the year of 2.5% to 3%. You've already done over 3% for the 9-month period. So is that number just a little conservative? Or is there something in Q4 that maybe I'm not aware of?
Yes. I think we've said before, Mark, that it will likely be at the higher end of the range. And so maybe a bit of conservatism. But overall, like I said, with the numbers we're well in line to be at the higher end of that range.
Okay. Great. And just maybe one more recently in the news, Loblaw was in the press or made a comment about removing restrictive covenants. Can you maybe comment on how often this actually comes up in your portfolio that you have to turn away, whether it's another grocer or a smaller food company store or something because of that? Is this something that's actually a material issue in -- if so, how do you see this impacting the way you operate?
Yes. Look, Mark, we don't see it as a material issue. Removing property controls obviously increases landlords flexibility to manage its asset and merchandise as it sees pets. And overall, we see the announcement as positive, and we are supportive of our Loblaw's position.
Does this ever come up though? Like is this something that you deal with regularly?
Intermittently, not regularly.
Our next question comes from the line of Lorne Kalmar with Desjardins.
And just before getting started on echo Sam's comments congratulating Mario and Erin. Maybe going back to the comment around the change in population growth assumptions, you talked about multi-res side. Wondering if you've seen any retailers, Loblaw has obviously included looking to curb growth plans on the back of that.
Lorne, this is Niall. No, we are not seeing any pullback.
Maybe deciding to announce it. What we are seeing is that many of the retailers we deal with, call it, discount-focused retailers and necessity-based retailers are using Choice because we have their national platform, and we're trying to help them with their expansion plans, but we're not seeing them curtail as Niall said.
Okay. And then maybe going over to the acquisition side of things. Can you maybe give us a little color on why you decided to go 50-50 on those 3 assets that you guys acquired during the quarter? And also expectation for management fees going forward?
Yes. Look, we started this deal earlier in the year. Interest rates were really elevated. We have a real commitment to a strong balance sheet, and we're going to continue to be disciplined about that. And given we weren't exactly sure how we would end up from a capital recycling point of view a disposition, we just thought it was prudent to find a JV partner given the size of the overall portfolio.
The management fees are not significant than our market fees. And I don't know the exact percentage standing.
Okay. That's fair enough. And then just last 1 for me. Obviously, there's been some noise on the G&A side. And I believe I recall correctly, you expect the outsourcing cost to continue through 4Q. Can you just maybe give us a rough idea of where G&A will be for 2025?
Sure. Lorne. You're right. For next quarter, there should be another maybe $2 million as we kind of pace down the outsourced implementation. I think a good run rate if you go about $15 million a quarter, $16 million a quarter. As a gross number. And then if you net -- and then when you back up the leasing costs, you get to kind of a $13 million number for FFO.
Our next question comes from the line of Mike Markidis with BMO Capital Markets.
I guess the rightsizing opportunity has been somewhat of a recurring theme over the last several quarters. Just curious if you could comment on how much runway you still left in that program. And then maybe just give us a sense if it's applicable to all formats, more specifically? Is it possible to do this in a superstore?
So we actually have recently done a superstore at Western Road. It's applicable to, I'd say, Loblaw -- like all formats. And we will continue to try and take advantage of it as Loblaw identified stores that they want to reinvest in from obviously resetting their footprint, and we think it's a true win-win because we can get an adjacent complementary tenant often at higher rents and then Loblaw spends a lot of the capital to reset the footprint.
Okay. Great. Rael, in your opening comments on Choice Caledon and the increased demand there that you're seeing. I don't know if this was intentional or not, but you did mention one of the attributes being access to power pursuit of data center development has become very stylish recently amongst industrial players in North America. Is that something that you were referring to or considering at this time?
We're not considering at the time because we actually don't have sufficient power for a data center, but we have enough power to build out our entire site for modern generic large distribution users. But I think I mentioned it on purpose because it's a real differentiator between our site and other sites in the GTA that we can actually meet development timelines of the RFPs out there.
Many sites cannot actually meet those timelines given they don't have access to the right utilities, including power.
Okay. Got it. I've actually heard that from others that sometimes municipality will say, thanks, it will be 24 months, before you can get your power. So thank you for clarifying. And then just lastly, can you just give us, remind us as part of Loblaw's plans to divest of some assets, what the program was, what your identified potential pipeline was. And now that you've done these -- the deal that you did in the quarter, what would be left?
So if you go back, I think it was 2 years ago or so, there was about $1.8 billion of real estate, which we had identified we'd buy roughly half of it and I think if you look back at the numbers, we're probably including with our partnership, bought about $600 million to $700 million of it. So that should give you a sense of what's remaining, probably $600 million of it. So there's probably another $300 million remaining approximately.
Our next question comes from the line of Gaurav Mazhar with Green Street.
Just 1 question. The investment ratio is at about 40% when you compare it in the beginning of the year, it's primarily unchanged. Just how should we think about debt to total assets going forward over the next 12 months? And where do you sort of see that panning out to given all the various capital allocation initiatives that you have?
Yes. So right now, we kind of look at it more on a debt-to-EBITDA, and we had said we're 7x debt-to-EBITDA. That's at the low end of our range. And so we see that increasing slightly as we ramp up development spend. There's acquisition opportunities, we may be a little more in balance if there's opportunities. But ultimately, our target is 7.5%, and we will stay well below that range.
Our next question comes from the line of Himanshu Gupta with Scotiabank.
On the industrial occupancy, I mean, it was down in Q3. And I think Niall, you mentioned Q4, you expect marginal decline in occupancy as well. So maybe you can elaborate how much space are you expecting to come back? And how do you fill that?
For the remaining quarter, we're expecting maybe 53,000 to come back. We're working on those deals, so that a lot. It's very minor. But then it's going to ramp up. We're expecting in the new year for that occupancy to be taken back and brought back into operation at IPG.
Okay. And so do you think 25% occupancy to be higher than current levels in that case?
We're expecting it to stay stable.
Okay. Okay. I mean my thought was, if you look at the market we can see right now is around 5% and your industrial portfolio which is around like 2% to 3%. So you're already outperforming the broader market. Do you see that continuing next year as well?
We do. We feel our assets in a very good position to maintain that.
Okay. Okay. Fair enough. And -- and I guess any thoughts on the same asset or same property NOI growth for the next year? I mean in the context of occupancy would be flat and you continue to see those rentals in that spread. What can that translate into?
We're expecting to see the same types of spreads, but the overall NOI growth will go down a little based on some of the geographical leasing that's happening across the portfolio.
We will keep -- Himanshu, we'll give more color next quarter when we released an outlook for 2025.
Sure. Sure. That's fair enough. And then signing the asset class, well, I mean, obviously, you bought this large distribution center in Mississauga. I think that's the shoppers tenant on a JV there. Can you remind us on the pricing? I mean anything on a dollar prefer basis or the going in cap rate on that property?
I don't -- it was around a 6% cap and I don't have a per foot number roughly. I don't have the per foot number. I think it was around $250 to $260 a foot.
Got it. And it also has that 2% escalators you were talking about on this asset as well?
Yes.
Okay. Okay. Understand. And then last question will be related to the JV partner do you see doing more such transactions on a JV going forward? Or this was like one-off and then more like 100% balance sheet transactions going forward?
Look, firstly, the way we think about partners is the first deal is always tough to do and we want partnerships that we can keep growing with and do multiple with. And you've seen that as a recurring theme with our partnerships.
So this is actually our second JV with Crest Point, and we hope we can continue -- second JV with 4 assets in this 1 and the other 1 has a single asset, but we hope we can continue to grow the partnership in the future.
Our next question comes from the line of Sumayya Syed with CIBC.
Just 1 question from me on the disposition and the held for sale assets. Just curious about the rationale here, there was I think, a power center in the mix. So just wondering if there's a desire to trim power center exposure? And do you have many more that you'd like to work through?
I would say -- we don't do many more that would like to work through. The power change that we've been selling have been strategic because we've actually been unwinding the partnerships together, and we've been selling for example, the one in Quebec City that we just sold, we had 3 assets with that partner. We've now sold all the assets and the 1 we are have sold under contract, so I'm not sure exactly in Saskatchewan.
It's the same thing. We're selling all the assets out of that partnership.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Brad Sturges with Raymond James.
Just real quick. Just on -- like from a modeling perspective, the lease termination fee income, would Q3 be the bulk of what you're expecting at this point? Or is there still more that you can receive by the end of the year?
I think we still have 1 more. I think it's a small number, Brad, probably I think around 2 million comes to mind. So it's not significant compared to the prior quarter.
Okay. And just a follow-up on the JV with Crest Point. Obviously, you talked about wanting to grow it further. But I guess it would also include standard growth rights on each side?
Yes, we have normal liquidity rights.
Seeing no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Rael Diamond for any closing comments.
Thank you, Brenna. Again, I'm very pleased with our results. Our performance this quarter and our team's ability to advance our strategic priorities is underpinned by our prudent approach to capital and risk management as well as the strength of our balance sheet. I'm confident that our balance sheet, consistent execution and focus on long-term growth will enable us to deliver stable cash flow growth, positioning choice to outperform over the long term. Thank you for your interest, your investment in choice and for joining us this morning.
This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.