Abc Technologies Holdings Inc
TSX:ABCT
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
N/A
N/A
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches CAD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Abc Technologies Holdings Inc
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Greetings, and welcome to the ABC Technologies Q1 Fiscal 2022 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn this conference over to your host, Mr. Nathan Barton, Director, Investor Relations. Thank you, sir. You may begin.
Thank you, and thanks to everyone for joining us today for ABC Technologies Q1 Fiscal 2022 Earnings Conference Call. With me on the call are Todd Sheppelman, President and Chief Executive Officer of ABC Technologies; and David Smith, Chief Financial Officer of ABC Technologies. This call is being webcast live on ABC Technologies Investor Relations website, and the webcast and accompanying slides will be available for replay for 12 months following this call. The content of today's call is the property of ABC Technologies. It can't be reproduced or transcribed without prior written consent from the company. Before we begin, I would like to remind you that today's call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws, which are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these statements. Any such statements should be considered in conjunction with cautionary statements in our earnings release and risk factor discussions in our filings within the Canadian securities regulatory authorities on SEDAR. Please review the disclaimer on Slide 2 of the earnings presentation for additional information. We assume no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements or information unless required by law. I want to remind our investors that we are on a fiscal year that began July 1, 2021. All references to our fiscal -- Q1 fiscal 2022 are through our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2021 and Q1 fiscal 2021 are to our fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2020. References to fiscal 2022 are to the 12 months ending June 30, 2022 and fiscal 2021 are to the 12 months ending June 30, 2021. I also want to note that while ABC shares trade in Canadian dollars, the company reports its financials in U.S. dollars. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Todd Sheppelman.
Thank you, Nathan, and good morning, everyone. We've continued to focus on controlling the controllable in our business and making adjustments to production and our workforce to assure we are ready for both the ongoing supply chain issues that the industry faces in the short term as well as help us emerge stronger for the future. We began our fiscal year on July 1 with a positive mindset in anticipation that the worst of the semiconductor shortages might be behind us, and the industry volume would begin to slowly increase over the quarter versus the prior months. However, the reality of the quarter quickly revealed a significant worsening of OEM production volumes from chip shortages versus the prior quarters. In an environment in which calendar 2021 production will likely be down year-over-year even compared to the COVID-based lows of the last year. This has certainly impacted ABC despite the best efforts of the team. Regardless of these near-term realities, which will be behind us at some point, we look to the macro environment and data points like record new and used car prices that show the demand for vehicles is extremely strong. We still believe that as the semiconductor supplier returns to normal and the OEM production environment normalizes. ABC and the auto industry are going to have multiple years of running it at a high level to meet the demand of the consumer market and rebuild at least a portion of the 2.5 million units of inventory that have been consumed. We are confident that ABC is positioned to grow at above market rates when production returns, as evidenced by the recent new business wins and our reputation as a go-to lightweight supplier in the market. Our focus remains on building our long-term capabilities to grow our business both organically and through acquisition to better serve our customers and stakeholders globally. Our organization will be stronger as the industry continues through its recovery, and we continue to be excited to capitalize on the opportunities presented by the current and future environment. Starting here on Slide 4. As many of you know, this quarter's results are comparable to our first quarter last year where the industry was quickly coming out of the COVID lockdowns that shut down automotive production for almost 2 months, and OEMs were running at a high level of production prior to any significant supply disruptions occurring. This quarter, we faced an overall market down more than 26% from expectations just a few months earlier with our largest customer seeing year-over-year reductions in production volumes of 20% to as much as 50%. And some of our largest platforms are seeing reductions of 30% to even 80% or more year-over-year as the limited supply of chips is being funneled where possible to only the highest profitable platforms for the OEMs.While we'd like to say that these shortages and production volatility are going to end in the very near term, it is ABC's view that shortages will continue through the end of calendar 2021 and begin to moderate through calendar 2022. We don't see industry-wide supply fully to meeting demand or opportunity to build inventory until calendar 2023. While current operating results continue to be impacted by the semiconductor shortages, the OEMs are not stepping back on commitments to future platforms with robust new program discussions and quoting activity starting our fiscal year. While we anticipated this quarter to be fairly slow from a new business wins perspective as new business awards are typically lumpy over the year, we did secure over $100 million in lifetime new business wins, including multiple BEV wins that, for the first time, exceeded our ICE wins for the quarter. On another positive note, I'm pleased to report that ABC has again won Nissan Supplier Diversity Award, which recognizes suppliers who exceed Nissan's objectives by successfully expanding opportunities for diverse businesses using certified minority suppliers. Since 2012, ABC supplier diversity spend has totaled over $860 million with over 125 certified suppliers. This is a testament to ABC's belief in creating not only a diverse workforce, but supply base as well.Finally, in addition to being committed to diversity, ABC is committed to the environment and recently completed a thorough study of our product portfolio and production techniques that revealed that approximately 92% of ABC's products are recyclable. While we are pleased with this figure, we are always working to decrease waste and environmental impact and are innovating with new materials and processes to drive more improvement. I also want to note that our third annual ESG report has been released on ABC's investor website, which highlights our achievements in our sustainability journey and is an important tool by which we grade our progress each year as being a good steward to the environment. During the first quarter, we also had a major development within our shareholder ranks as ABC's former majority owner, Cerberus, sold its remaining stake in funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management. Oaktree has appointed 3 board members, replacing those associated with Cerberus, who will be leaving the board. As a preeminent global investor firm with decades of experience creating value, we believe Oaktree will be a supportive addition to ABC's vision to further grow the business into a global lightweighting powerhouse. Now let's get into the first quarter highlights shown here on this slide. I want to start by saying that while the results you see here today were largely out of ABC's control due to the global chip shortages, we are not taking these results lying down and we are not certainly happy with them. Over the course of the last quarter and the last several quarters, we have taken a number of steps to reduce overhead costs, including reducing overhead staffing in our plants, reduced discretionary spending, a more measured hiring of staff, deferral of nonessential costs. And we will continue to adjust our cost structure as needed going forward. Our revenue for the first quarter declined to $163.4 million from $258.4 million in the year ago period, which at that time reflected an operating environment that was running on all cylinders to make up for the lost volume as a result of the lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adjusted EBITDA declined to negative $11 million from positive $41 million last year, and adjusted free cash flow was negative $60 million due to the declines in operating results and the effects of unwinding of working capital from the significant production slowdowns. On the next slide, as we've done in prior quarters, we will be briefly discussing the impacts of the supply chain disruptions on our fiscal Q1 '22 results. As you can see on Slide 5, our results continue to be impacted by the global semiconductor shortages. With this quarter, we hope representing a bottoming of the production environment for North America. Actual production volumes for Q3 were more than 26% below IHS projections released just in the middle of June, with the entire second half of calendar 2021 anticipated to be down a similar amount.For our fiscal first quarter, several of ABC's top customers' production volumes declined at a greater rate than the overall market, with revenues falling 30%, 40%, even 50% from the initial IHS-based assumptions with significant negative volatility across multiple of our top vehicle platforms. We've also continued to feel an impact from elevated resin prices on the 50% portion of our resin that is not hedged. Prices for polypropylene are still about 80% above the 10-year average levels with high-density polyethylene, our other major resin supply, is over 30% above the 10-year average. Thankfully, we are beginning to see some stability and even price declines in the market with additional reductions expected in the coming months based on IHS forecast, though these will take a little time before you expect to see the lower resin prices flowing through our financial results.As COVID outbreaks and lockdowns continue to be an issue in many parts of Asia that are key to the semiconductor supply chain, views of when the long-awaited production volume recovery will occur have been pushed back by at least another quarter. Though we expect chip shortages to moderate over the coming 3 to 4 quarters and volume to improve sequentially from this quarter's lows, industry experts are not calling for sufficient chip supply to actually recover any significant amounts of lost volume and rebuild dealer inventories until early 2023. As we have provided in past quarters, at right, you'll see a bridge of the impacts of our financial results from OEM production stoppages, primarily due to semiconductor shortages as well as elevated resin costs. We estimate that semiconductor-related lost volume negatively impacted fiscal Q1 by $119 million of revenue or almost 40% and $37 million impact on adjusted EBITDA. We were also impacted by delayed launches on a new vehicle that had high ABC content, which resulted from an unrelated supplier production issue that reduced the quarter by about $8 million of revenue and a little more than $2 million of EBITDA.On resin, where we estimate the financial impacts by comparing current prices versus the 10-year average price for our 2 highest volume resin types, polypropylene and high-density polyethylene, we estimate ABC's fiscal Q1 was negatively impacted by about $7 million of adjusted EBITDA. Not included explicitly as an add-back is a certain level of operating inefficiency that resulted from the frequent stops and starts in our production brought on by significant changes in the production schedules from our OEM customers, which we estimate impacted profitability and margin by 250 to 300 basis points from normal levels.Moving on to Slide 6, which gives you an update on the macro environment and what we view as the clearest sign of the currently corked potential for the market to explode when chip supply returns to the industry. Since we last spoke, IHS has further downgraded expectations for FY '22 and the first half of FY '23 but not as significantly as the September revision that occurred prior to our FY '21 year-end results call. However, despite the negative headlines, we remain positive as we have seen a very similar environment to this following the COVID shutdowns last year with an explosive reversal to production happening at a moment's notice, and ABC stood to the ready for our customer OEM production volumes.Currently, IHS is projecting a more normalized production environment will not return until the second half of calendar 2022. But part of the job as a Tier 1 supplier is to be ready to produce at OEM's production schedules, which has recently been more optimistic than those of IHS. Unfortunately, this needs to stand at the ready on a weekly basis given releases from our customer also causes an inability for ABC to fully flex down some of the variable cost components of its operating module, which you clearly saw in our results for the quarter. While we, like the rest of the industry, are hoping that IHS will end up being conservative in their lost volume assumptions and timing, the current reality is that there are at least 4 million vehicles that have been lost in North America alone that need to be made up over the coming years. IHS is now projecting production of 4.4 million units per quarter through 2028. Looking back at the 5-year average of quarterly production pre-pandemic of just under 4.3 million. This means we'll likely build up only about 400,000 to 500,000 additional vehicles annually to replace the currently depleted inventory, resulting in 5 to 7 years of higher-than-average production just to replenish dealer lots. This is great news for ABC and the entire industry. As you can see on the right, the inventory in the U.S. right now continues to fall to record low levels, registering only 900,000 vehicles in the most recent month. Industry inventory is now well below the levels seen during the financial crisis with only 22 days on hand and still falling. If any of you have tried to find a newer used car recently, or observed the vehicle prices out there, demand is still as strong as ever, and we're looking forward to the opportunity to meet it with supply as soon as we can.Moving to Slide 7. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, we're still seeing robust quoting activity from the OEMs and have had a solid first quarter. We received over $100 million of new lifetime business wins, which was ahead of our plan for the quarter. These wins were spread out across the [ B3 ] and serving European and Asian OEMs. One of the most exciting parts of our wins this quarter is that this is the first quarter ever where EV wins have exceeded ice-based vehicle wins as we have had one large EV win along with several other additions to platforms on which we've already won business. While new business can be very lumpy, we expect we'll continue to see EV wins being a larger and larger percentage of our overall book of business moving forward.On the left side of the slide, you'll also see an important launches for the quarter. It goes without saying that due to the chip shortages, volumes of these platforms will be ramping up slower than we normally would expect to see. But obviously, the Frontier and Civic are high-volume platforms for Nissan and Honda, respectively. The Ford SuperDuty is one of the vehicles that Ford will be doing all they can to keep chips flowing to that platform as it is highly profitable vehicle for them. And then the Hummer is, of course, GM's halo vehicle entry into the high-end BEV utility market that we think will see a ton of growth in the coming years to match the significant preproduction demand. As far as launches for the quarter, we had almost 20 new program launches on a number of platforms around the world with [ B3 ] European and Asian OEMs as well as several Tier 1 suppliers. On Slide 8, we want to take a minute to talk about some of the new product and technologies that we are introducing to customers and implementing internally to drive greater productivity and cost efficiencies. We touched on these in earlier phases of development during the IPO road show, and in the case of biopolymer fillers, are actively presenting this new material development to customers as a more eco-friendly replacement opportunity versus 100% fossil fuel-based plastic resin. Not only are blended biopolymers an important sustainable solution that is more environmentally friendly than traditional parts made with 100% plastic resin, we also have seen lower mass, reduced cycle time, reduced energy usage and certainly improved material mechanical properties while still meeting our customers' stringent requirements. By increasing the adoption of materials with organic biomass, such as wood pulp, future ABC parts can rely on inputs from more sustainable sources with a lower environmental impact, consistent with our goal of serving our customers' needs while reducing our footprints. The other technology I wanted to highlight today is the process that ABC has developed in-house called variable cooling, which is a novel process innovation that helps reduce overall cycle time or the time it takes to produce a part. Variable cooling utilizes a patent pending process involving induction heating elements for only a small portion of the overall production cycle versus the current standard of constantly heating during the entire cycle of production. This results in shorter production cycle time, which in turn increases the throughput of the machinery. Based on the case studies done for our key customer, we have seen increased productivity of more than 20% in our machines for certain blow-molded parts. What this means is that ABC can free up an additional 20% of production capacity for new programs, which in turn provides an opportunity to bring in more business with lower ABC investment. These benefits will allow ABC to further improve our competitiveness while driving continuous process improvement in our production for new programs that we are actively pursuing. These are the kind of innovations we are currently working on within ABC as an important aspect of constantly striving to reduce costs while maintaining quality and output for our OEM customers, which has been a differentiator for ABC for many years. On Slide 9, to sum things up, while we are certainly not pleased with the current state of the industry and the result in financial outcomes ABC delivered this quarter, we have taken and are continuing to take steps to mitigate additional downside to results. We also believe this quarter may be seeing the bottoming and negative revisions to IHS projections as well as actual production. However, as I said earlier, this is not an issue that's going away tomorrow, but we believe it will gradually and continually improve. We continue to build a strong book of new business wins with over $100 million of lifetime revenues with the majority being EV wins. Though we're seeing SAAR results that hampered significantly by the lack of vehicles on dealer lots, we're still seeing that consumer demand for vehicles is extremely strong, as evidenced by record prices for both new and used vehicles in the market right now. The industry has also seen several million vehicles of inventory shortfall to make up for us, and we are excited about the opportunity to run at accelerated levels in the future to deliver on current demand as well as the inventory rebuild that is so desperately needed in the market right now. And finally, consistent with our previous disclosures to investors, we remain very focused on opportunities to grow through acquisitions and are seeing as well as actively evaluating a number of exciting opportunities. We remain extremely positive on the long-term prospects for ABC and are focused on the strategies we're required to deliver on those expectations. With that, I'll turn it over to David.
Thanks, Todd. I'll take just a few minutes here to go through some of the highlights of the fiscal first quarter, and then we'll move on to Q&A from the audience. The charts on Slide 11 shows sales, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow for our fiscal first quarter and also shows our estimate for the financial impacts of the current supply chain disruptions. So you can see where we believe the business would have performed under normal circumstance. It's important to note in this quarter, we are comping to relatively strong results from our first fiscal quarter 2021 that benefited from the restart of OEM production without significant supply disruption following the COVID-19 lockdowns that began to ease in May of 2020. ABC's revenue for Q1 fiscal 2022 declined almost 37% from the $258.4 million to $163.4 million, due almost entirely to semiconductor-related production stoppages as well as interruptions at one of our OEM customers related to issues with another supplier. As Todd mentioned earlier in his prepared remarks, though industry production in the quarter was down 25% year-over-year, many of our customers saw their volumes decline greater than the market and certain platforms from a JVC derives high CPV saw volumes decline between 30% to more than 80%. So cost of sales decreased on an absolute basis as a percentage of revenue, COGS increased significantly to 99.4% of revenue from 80.9% in Q1 fiscal 2021. Operating leverage was lost as ABC must maintain a certain level of headcount to run machine even for limited periods to satisfy OEM demand and therefore, ends up with less fixed cost absorption hurting gross margin as we've seen this quarter. SG&A expenses were $28.3 million compared to $29.4 million, which, of course, a decline on an absolute basis. But as a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses increased to 17.3% in the current quarter from 11.4% in Q1 fiscal 2021. Though Q1 fiscal 2022 saw higher wages and share-based compensation expenses year-over-year due to being a public company, this was more than offset by reduced foreign exchange losses and lower transaction retreatment and bonus expenses. ABC reported a net loss of $28.2 million in Q1 compared to net income of $9.3 million in Q1 of the prior year. The net loss per share in Q1 fiscal 2022 was $0.54 compared to earnings per share of $0.18 in the same quarter last year. Both figures are on a basic and fully diluted basis. Adjusted EBITDA for Q1 fiscal 2022 declined to negative $11.3 million from positive EBITDA of $41.2 million. The adjusted EBITDA margin for the quarter was negative 6% compared to positive 14.2% last year. Adjusted free cash flow for the quarter was negative $59.5 million versus positive $56.5 million in Q1 fiscal 2021. Both years results for the current quarter obviously stemming from the combination of significantly lower revenue due to semiconductor shortages, higher input costs, primarily due to increased resin costs and efficient plant operations due to short notifications by OEMs of their own plant closures. In the case of free cash flow, our results were also negatively impacted by working capital tightening, which saw reduced receivables as a result of production call-offs, while inventory increased as ABC was forced to produce parts for OEM facilities that were shuttered with minimal advanced notice, along with increasing ocean transit times of overseas materials related to port delays and freight driver shortages. I'll note for modeling purposes again that our adjusted EBITDA includes our 50% proportionate share of our JV EBITDA. And likewise, the computation of adjusted EBITDA margin includes 50% of the JV's revenue in the denominator. Because the JV is included in the income statement on the equity method basis, we refer to our MD&A to feed the JV proportionate sales and adjusted EBITDA details. Our MD&A is filed on SEDAR and is also available on our investor website. Moving to Slide 12, which shows our cash usage for the quarter. Cash from ops saw a significant negative impact from the similar net working capital tightening to what we saw during COVID last year as ABC had much lower receivables coming in the door versus the payables that continue to unwind over time. While we did pull back on our CapEx spend, which was fairly efficient in absolute dollars basis, on a normalized revenue, because of the speed and severity at which this quarter's production volume and revenue declined, we were not able to ratchet back capital spending sufficiently to stay under our target of about 5.5% of revenue. Most of our capital spending is for future programs, which are launching post semiconductor shortage environment. Due to the ongoing production slowdowns affecting not only ABC but also our JVs, we did not receive any dividends in this quarter. On Slide 13, you'll see a snapshot of our capital structure and liquidity. As you'll note, due to the rapid decline in industry production, we've joined our revolver and have seen leverage increase commensurate with that draw in the current operating results. As a result, we proactively negotiated covenant relief with our lender group that will run through Q2 of fiscal 2023 or calendar Q4 2022. While the industry gets through what we believe will be the worst of the semiconductor-related slowdown. To the extent we see operating results improved greater than our expectations, you will see ABC using excess cash to pay down debt. It should be noted, of course, that our leverage level is primarily explained by the abnormally low EBITDA brought on by the semiconductor crisis. So to some degree, just the passage of time and improved operating results should see leverage brought back down. All that said, we still have sufficient liquidity available to fund our operating needs of just over $120 million of total liquidity available. In any case, the company will continue to focus on enhancing its liquidity position. With that, I'll turn it back over to Todd for a few closing remarks. Todd?
Yes. Thanks, David. As you've seen this quarter with ABC as well as the broader auto supplier universe, in some ways, we're in an environment like we've never experienced before where demand is massively outstripping supply with no recourse to answer for the moment. But in other ways, it's similar to parts of what we experienced during COVID last year, but with less widespread full shutdown of all plants across the industry. What we learned during that time is that ABC is able to control our cost but also support our workforce and be immediately ready for our customers' volumes to pick back up, which can restart with little notice, a scenario that we're all anxiously awaiting at the moment. As we've seen the rate of negative change slow in the most recent IHS volume revisions, we're hopeful that our Q1 fiscal results represent the bottoming for production and we can see volumes improve, albeit slightly throughout the fiscal year. However, as we've discussed at the beginning of our current fiscal year, there are still a lot of uncertainty out there. And as a result, we're maintaining our existing view that the auto production environment is still exhibiting a level of volatility, which makes it nearly impossible to accurately provide financial guidance. We will continually revisit this position as the year goes on and plan to provide guidance as conditions stabilize in the market. As we previously demonstrated, ABC has significant positive operating leverage when things get going again, and we're looking forward to that in the not-too-distant future. With that, I will conclude our prepared remarks. Thank you, everyone, for listening and for your support. David and I are now happy to take your questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from Ryan Brinkman from JPMorgan.
Maybe first, I wanted to ask around how you're thinking about managing working capital, including after it looks like your inventory rose, I think, $18 million sequentially even as your sales were down $70 million, we've been hearing a lot from other suppliers this quarter about both intentional and unintentional inventory builds, maybe like intentional in order to secure components or commodities which are in danger of being in short supply to build the cushion, or unintentional because of sudden automaker shutdowns and order cancellations including towards the end of the quarter. So what would you say were the drivers of your inventory increase? And how and when do you see those drivers playing out or even maybe reversing? And I know you're not guiding to fiscal '22 EBITDA, but how should investors like broadly be thinking about cash flow tracking in '22 relative to whatever EBITDA that you do print including because of the trend in working capital or other considerations such as CapEx?
Yes, Ryan. I just appreciate the question, and I'll start off and then I'll let David jump in there. But I would say that we've got a mixture of some of the increases are from intentional builds, both to protect on some materials that are short in the marketplace, also just some different program launches coming up that we typically want to build forward. But I would say the majority of it is unintentional through actions of quick shutdowns. Typically, what we were seeing over this quarter was volumes from our customer, just being a lot higher than the schedules were supposed to be. And then all of a sudden on Thursday, we get a call and say, right, we're not doing that next week. And so we'd just be stuck with a significant amount of finished goods from canceled call-offs with virtually no notice at all. I'd say the other thing that we've got is just from the supply chain route right now. What used to take, say, 6 weeks on the water from Asia is now a 12-week on the water. So if you're trying to cancel something, you're back at least 12 weeks. So it just led to these overall inefficiencies in the whole supply chain right now, whether it's unloading ships at the ports in California, by getting trucks to transport across the United States to our facilities, all of those lead times have just backed up substantially. And you put that into a combination where we've got erratic customer releases happening with literally one day notice to not ship after we produced parts for them for a whole week has just really made it very difficult. So we're already starting to see some of that fall off right now. November, we've got, I'd say, a vast majority of all customer plants are back up and running, albeit at a -- not a full state of production, but at least they're running. And so we've seen already some inventory reductions over the last 1.5 weeks as the volumes have picked back up. So I think this is a temporary spike but we're certainly focused on it, and we'll be able to drive that down. But I'll let David comment a little bit more, but a lot of the working capital increase was not only inventory, but also just the unwinding the payables and receivables as well. So David, do you want to add to that?
I do. Thanks, Todd. Ryan, good to talk with you again. So I think Todd mentioned some of the things related to inventory. And I think a bunch of the things were what you had mentioned, and that's really relative to the production inventory. But of the $18 million, $10 million of that really is tooling inventory. And as Todd mentioned in his prepared comments, we have a lot of -- for our customers, life continues on, and there's a bunch of new program launches that are in the queue. So we are -- we expect to be having these programs meet the customer certification requirements during this quarter and partially into our third fiscal quarter. And we would expect to see that tooling inventory come down as it naturally does in the process of getting the customer to sign off on it and then ultimately pay for it. So I think you see about $10 million of the $18 million as a bit of a spike related to that. But I think that's just normal. Customers moving on, programs launching all, I think, good things for the business. I think the other thing, too, that's just a little bit at play here with respect to the inventory is some of the higher prices that we're paying on the resin side creep in ultimately to the inventory balance as well. So there's a bit of that, that's at play. And then I'll just echo Todd's sentiments relative to working capital. I think the diligence we have around managing working capital is really unchanged, and we keep driving on all fronts. But it really is the business activity that's causing the swings. But I would expect us to get back right in line with historical levels as soon as business starts to normalize, which, again, I think we're looking forward to in the next couple of quarters.
Okay. That's very helpful. And I wanted to ask you on another broad theme we've been hearing from suppliers this quarter, which is the negotiation with automakers for the recovery of non-commodity supply chain costs. So I think many suppliers are 80% or more covered with regard to commodity cost pass-throughs in their contracts. But they don't have mechanisms to -- in place to recover such things as like labor, ocean shipping, freight, diesel, electricity, natural gas, all the stuff. So I just wanted to check in on how you think you may be positioned to recover non-commodity supply chain costs, including because I know you have less commodity pass-through, less automatic commodity pass-throughs than most suppliers, maybe like 50% versus their 80% or 90% or something. Does that less automatic commodity pass-through will help you? Or hurt me when it comes to recovering the non-commodity costs? I'm not sure if maybe it might help because you're already regularly engaging in discussions with customers about the commodity costs because they're not out of that, or so you can just tack on the request of those conversations? Or if it somehow makes it more difficult because you've already got more wood to chop in discussions already just to recover the commodity cost let alone the non-commodity costs. How should we be thinking about this?
Yes, Ryan. So I think the way I look at this is, I've been doing this a long time and dealing with customers for a long time, and there's no single customer that you walk in and say I've had an increase in cost and they automatically -- that's unfortunate, here's a bunch of money. So it's always going to be a negotiation. It's always going to be a discussion point that flows into the business and crosses multiple fronts. Typically, what we see is when we're in an environment like this, that we do have some trade-offs with what their expectations are for year-over-year price givebacks on these types of costs always enter into those discussions and negotiations. And I'd say we've had some pretty good success over time and currently on certainly making the customers aware of what the issues are and to use those as leverage points on just overall negotiations that are continually going on with our customers. So I'd say we're actively engaged, have been for a significant amount of time. It's just an ongoing part of the business. And I'd say we're as successful as others in the industry are on recovery and never enough, but I'd say, of a fair share, but we've been trying to target through various mechanisms of negotiation.
Okay. And lastly, I just wanted to ask about some of those potential acquisitions that you might be considering, such as the ones that were referenced in the press release announcing the transaction between Cerberus and Apollo. Just given the softer industry volume backdrop, how does that impact potential acquisitions? Does it make it easier to be a buyer? Do you think let more opportunities or aid in price negotiations? Anything to report on that front?
Yes. So, I guess, I would without tipping our hand on exactly what's going on, I'd just say that we've got significant focus on this. We're spending a lot of time on it. I think that the industry situation itself is opening opportunities up that probably would not have been there previously. But I would also say along with that, that the recent softening in the market has really not deterred from some of the ongoing conversations that we've had with companies on areas that we're looking at right now. So I'd say it's in the near-term and the future, it will maybe make the market better for some M&A activity. It certainly has not slowed down the activity that we've been involved with over the last several months. And we just view that this is a continued great market opportunity for us to consolidate the plastic space. That's our focus, and that's what we're spending a lot of our time on. And so I don't think it hampers. I think there's maybe a little bit of additional lubrication in the system because of the significant backdrop of lowering volumes and more pressure on the supply base. So we view that as an opportunity, and we'll continue to do so. But we're not going to make acquisitions outside of our swim lanes that we think are the important ones to take a look at. We'll stay within what we think is the right area of focus. And -- but I think you'll see that there's a lot of opportunity in the market, and we're hopeful to be able to have conversations in more detail when they mature. And can't necessarily give an indication of when that might be, but we just say that we're very active in the acquisition area.
The next question is from John Chu from Desjardins Capital Markets.
So just further on, on the resin prices. So can you maybe just go into more detail about the pass-through mechanisms. You have 3 months and 6 months is where you generally can do some of that pass-through. But are the majority of those contracts fall into the 3 months or the 6 months? I'm just trying to get an understanding of why we might see some of that adjustment taking place, whether it could be sooner or maybe later because it's -- they're more weighted towards a 6-month part?
Sure. So again, I think that the majority of the contracts are going to be on a 6-month lag. There's -- if you say it's 70-30 or something like that, just real rough approximate terms. But there's more that do adjust on the 6-month term.
And is it fair to say that as...
So go ahead.
John, please go ahead.
Sure. And is it fair to say then that as resin prices seem to be coming off, that as these mechanisms take place, you actually might get a bit of a tailwind if resin prices continue to fall until the next 6-month adjustment, is that a potential tailwind?
That's exactly -- when prices are fluctuating significantly, that's exactly the trend we will see where we may be getting price increases exactly at the time when our actual costs are falling. But you need to look at over the course of a longer term, and it does balance out, but it is very possible that based on the way the index is calculated, we will be getting price increases and our actual costs are following.
Okay. Great. And then just on -- in terms of the volume outlook. You talked about how the industry average was down around 25%, but some of your particular important platforms were down 30%, 40% and upwards of 80%. And presumably, that's just based on the OEMs preferring to focus on some of their higher-margin platforms. So is it safe to assume that going forward, as you still go through this chip shortage, that your volumes are going to continue to lag the industry average until we start to get more normalized chip supplies?
Yes. I would say, John, that what we're seeing right now is that, as we've mentioned earlier, as of November 1, some of our largest customers, all of their production plants are up and running. And albeit not at full volumes, but they are running the plants now, whereas in the past, they were not. So as chips become more available, basically, a lot of the chips were stolen from the CUV market and put into the pickup truck market. And while we've got great concentration in pickup trucks, just overall, the CUV market is a much larger volume and that's where a lot of our bread and butter is. So as the chip supply continues to build, you'll see more CUVs be built, which I think will certainly help our volumes and be a tailwind for us going forward. This last quarter, even all of the big 3 pickup trucks were all hit pretty substantial during the quarter from what was the expectation going into the quarter. So even pickup trucks were hit this past quarter, we think going forward, that's going to change over and pick up truck demand will be met and then the excess capacity. We know that a lot of the OEMs are really feeling a lot of inventory pain by not having CUVs in the marketplace right now. So there's an increased focus on what can be done maybe bypassing options as an example. You've seen on some of the OEMs have already announced that, but they just need to get vehicles into the marketplace. So we think that will be helpful as most of those vehicles entering will be CUVs where we've got above market concentration.
Okay. And just last question.
And some of the CUVs do have like low, low days on hand, right, single or maybe just in the teens in terms of days on hand. So that there really is a big driver behind that to try to rebuild that pipeline.
Okay. Great. And then just last question. Just on the revenue recognition question here. So a lot of OEMs have vehicles sitting just on the lot still waiting for chips or whatnot. Do you get to recognize the revenue on have you contributed to that vehicle that's just sitting on the lot? Or does it have to be fully complete before you can actually recognize that revenue. I'm just wondering if there's a buildup of revenue that hasn't quite been recognized yet that you've already submitted.
That's a really good question. But the terms of our contracts are such that we've completed the revenue earning process at the point in time when we've made the delivery. And none of it is contingent upon the customer actually selling the vehicle on into the marketplace. And so I can tell you that with all assurances, we bill and we're getting paid within the customary times from the time that we've delivered to the customer production facilities.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from Jaideep Kumar from BMO Capital Markets.
This is Jaideep Kumar on behalf of Peter Sklar. First, questions to the workforce in your prepared remarks. I was hoping you could expand on that and just tell us how you're handling labor would be constantly changing production schedules. Are you sending people home? Any color there would be great.
Yes. I appreciate the call or the question for sure. It's something that we certainly spend a lot of time on. And a lot of it depends on -- certainly, the focus we have is how do you flex your labor while still have the ability to retain it. And the key thing for us is we operate in a lot of, I'd say, tight labor markets and the markets have continued to be tight. So we've looked at a various -- a variety of different options on how we can do work share programs to share work hours. Maybe not everybody gets as much as they would like, but at least, we're sharing the hours. We have looked at some layoffs in certain areas, and then just looked at what we can do to continue to use as much labor without being wasteful with it. It's not like we can build parts ahead. There's just not the racks for our parts. So there's no quantity of those in the system to build ahead. So we basically build to order. So if our customers aren't running, typically, our labor is not running at the same time. So we just do a number of retention mechanisms. We're constantly being in touch with people, making sure that they're at the ready though they might not be working full shift during the week and just making sure we've got engagement with them. But it is a delicate balance, and it's also hard for us to manage the labor costs when we still have schedules from our customers for, let's say, a Monday, and we have to pre-produce those parts by at least a couple of days. So on Thursday, we're building parts for Monday. And then all of a sudden, we get notification halfway through Thursday afternoon that the customer is not going to be building on Monday, then all of a sudden, we have to stop at that point in time. So when you have literally half a day's notice on what to do with your labor, it's very difficult to manage it in an efficient way. So I think our plants have done the best that we could, given the constant juggling and then start up and start down shutdown that we've seen. And just also wanted you could give one more example of that is during the beginning of the crisis week, we've had several examples of where a customer would tell us on Thursday, they're not going to produce for 2 more weeks. And then your thought would be all right, so you can lay off that labor for 2 weeks. But then we've had multiple instances where the customer would come back in the middle of the follow and we can say, Oh, no, we found chips now we're going to start producing the following Monday. So you can't necessarily rely on the last information you have because the startups and start and shutdowns have been so quick with little lead time and notice, it's just been a very difficult balancing act for us.
Maybe just a follow-up to that. Are you still seeing that the notices [indiscernible] changes are still just as bad in Q2 compared to Q1 earliest as far as you can tell so far in the quarter?
And I would say we're positive on not hearing a lot of bad news here recently. So the quick shutdowns that we had seen during the third quarter calendar year, in particular, seem to have been dropping off significantly. Typically, our customers were having meetings with the supply base on Thursdays to tell us whether or not they were going to be producing on Monday or not. There really haven't been those calls for the past several weeks as the schedule seem to be a little bit firmer than we've seen. So from that aspect, we just look at this as no bad news is actually good news for us. And we do see a little bit more strength in the overall market. So there is room for some optimism that we're moving forward. But you never know where the bottom is until you're well past it. And while we can be hopeful that we're past the bottom of this frustrating market that we're in right now until we've got several data points that we can put together, which is really going to be several weeks, if not months of production without interruption. Then we can look back and say we've seen bottom early indications are that the production call-offs are certainly less frequent than they've been in the past.
Okay. And just one last one for me. Were there any program launches delayed in fiscal '21 in this quarter as a result of the semiconductor shortage? And should we expect higher launch costs in fiscal '22 as some of these delayed programs launch and coincide with planned program launches?
Yes. I think the big one that we called out on Page 5 of the presentation was at one OEM, there was a supplier-related issue unrelated to ABC that delayed the launch of a major vehicle that we had significant content on. That was probably the biggest launch delay. And it was, I'll call it, somewhat related to COVID as I won't go into the details of what it was. But I'd say with semi related to COVID. We haven't seen a significant delay in launches from our other customers. It's just been lower volume ramp-ups than we typically stated. So I don't expect that we're pushing any launch costs out into future months that would be of any significant consequence for us to look at. David, I don't know if you want to add to that or not?
No, that is my thought. There's been some little things months or 2 months here, nothing significant, and I don't think anything it will have any kind of a material impact.
This concludes the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Todd Sheppelman for any closing remarks.
Yes. Thank you. So we've talked about a lot of different topics here. And then just in closing, I would say this was a very tough quarter for us, and I can say it was a frustrating quarter as well. This is difficult when you don't have a lot of control over what your revenue is going to be on very short notice of time. But we can't let that frustration getting our way. We're really looking at what we can do to continue to focus on how do we better the company for the exit of the chip crisis and be better than we entered the crisis, and that's really where our focus is at as well as on the M&A activity. We're starting to see some strengthening in the volumes over these last few weeks, which had been the anticipation coming out of the third calendar quarter, which is our first fiscal quarter. And as I mentioned, a lessening of the production call off. So I think there is just some small glimmers of positive news out there. But just overall, we're just while we're dealing with this current situation, we're extremely positive on the future. We think that this recovery will be coming up. It will be happening at some point in time. We've got a lot ahead of us, and we think that we will definitely exit this as a better company than we entered it and are spending a lot of time on making sure we take care of both the near-term as well as the long-term of this company, which we have a very positive view of. So with that, I appreciate your continued support and for listening to us over the past hour. And we'll have conversations with some of you. But if you have further comments or questions, please get a hold of Nathan, and then we'd be happy to continue the conversation.
This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.