B

Basic Sanitation Company of the State of Sao Paulo SABESP
SWB:SAJA

Watchlist Manager
Basic Sanitation Company of the State of Sao Paulo SABESP
SWB:SAJA
Watchlist
Price: 15.7 EUR 2.61%
Market Cap: 4.6B EUR
Have any thoughts about
Basic Sanitation Company of the State of Sao Paulo SABESP?
Write Note

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2020-Q1

from 0
Operator

Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. At this time, we would like to welcome everybody to SABESP's conference call to discuss its results for the first quarter 2020. The audio of this conference is being broadcast simultaneously through the Internet on the website of www.sabesp.com.br, where you can also find the slides of presentation available for download. [Operator Instructions]

Before proceeding, let me mention that forward-looking statements are being made under the safe harbor of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of SABESP's management and on information currently available to the company. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions because they relate to future events and therefore, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Investors should understand that general economic conditions and industry conditions and other operating factors could also affect the future results of SABESP and could cause results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements.

Today with us, we have Rui Affonso, Chief Financial Officer; and Investor Relations Officer, Mario Arruda Sampaio, Head of Capital Market and Investor Relations; and Marcelo Miyagui, Head of Accounting.

Now I will turn the conference over to Mario Sampaio. Sir, you may begin your conference.

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Okay. Thank you, everybody to join us on this conference for our first quarter 2020. As usual, we have some slides. Let's go through them, and then we're open for questions and answer.

So let's move to Slide 3. Here, we see a 2.6% growth in total build volume of water and sewage in the first quarter of the year. The total billed volume increased 2.2%, of which 2% in water and 2.5% in sewage. This is compared to the first quarter of '19 and without considering the municipality of Santo André. The increase was chiefly due to the residential category, which moved up by 2.7%. This is mainly in the metro region of São Paulo with emphasis on the municipality of São Paulo and Guarulhos. As for the municipality of Santo André, as you remember, we service on a wholesale basis up to first quarter '19 and we have been servicing since August 2019 on a retail basis. The drop in billed water volume is natural at the beginning of a retail operations. Since the losses in the distribution systems are not recognized by SABESP.

On the other hand, there is a relevant increase in the volume of sewage treatment in Santo André as we did not operate the system at all before we took over. It was possible also to notice an increase in volume in the residential category in almost all the municipalities operated and a trend of greater increase in satellite cities, both of São Paulo and in other savings that are regional centers in the interior land and the coastal lines we operate. Although it is not possible to observe significant impacts on volumes for this quarter due to the isolation measures adopted at the end of March, we noticed a reduction in the volume build in the industrial and public categories at 2.2% and 1%. The reasons for the effect invoice volumes not being significant due to the isolation, is that only the accounts that were read at the end of March would capture this event.

Move on to Slide 4, let's discuss our financial results. We recorded a loss of BRL 657 million in the first quarter of 2020 compared to an income of BRL 647 million in the first quarter of '19. The loss recorded in this first quarter of '20 was mainly due to the BRL 1.8 billion expense with exchange rate variations from borrowings and financing denominated in dollars and yen. In terms of the negative impact of the exchange rate variation on the debt service and on our cash, it was really small compared to the BRL 1.8 billion, that is BRL 42 million. Despite the net loss recorded in the quarter, earnings before taxes and financial results was a positive BRL 1 billion, but BRL 138 million lower than in the same period of 2019. This reduction was mainly due to the BRL 149 million increase in allowance for doubtful accounts.

First quarter adjusted EBITDA was BRL 1.48 billion compared to BRL 1.54 billion in first quarter '19, that is a reduction of 3.9%. Net operating revenue increased BRL 163 million or 4.2% in the first quarter of '20 from BRL 3.88 billion to BRL 4.04 billion, as a result of the BRL 268 million or 7.6% increase in gross revenue and the BRL 82.1 million or 13.6% decrease in construction revenues.

As for costs, administrative and selling expenses and construction costs, there was an increase of 10.9% or BRL 299 million. If we disregard the effects of construction costs, the increase was 17.6% or BRL 380 million. The first quarter adjusted EBITDA margin was 36.7% compared to 39.8% in first quarter '19. The adjusted EBITDA margin of the last 2 -- 12 months was 41.1%. If we exclude the effects of revenue and construction costs, the adjusted EBITDA margin fell to 41.8% in '20 -- first quarter of '20 compared to the margin of 46.8% in first quarter '19. In the LTM 12 months, the margin was 48.3%.

Moving to costs on the next slide, let's highlight the main variations. Well, again, as we already mentioned on previous slide, costs, administrative selling, expenses and construction costs increased BRL 299 million or 10.9% year-over-year first quarter '20, that is from BRL 2.75 billion first quarter '19 to BRL 3.04 billion in first quarter '20. Excluding construction costs, cost and administrative and selling expenses increased BRL 380 million or 17.6%. The main increases were in allowance for adoption of accounts of BRL 149 million, general expenses of BRL 100 million, depreciation and amortization of BRL 72 million and electricity expenses of BRL 43 million.

Here, it's worth noting that delinquency increased by approximately BRL 100 million in the first quarter '20 compared to December 2019. In addition, expected losses should increase due to the economic stability, worsened by the COVID-19 crisis. For a further breakdown of these and other changes in costs, please refer to our press release.

Let's move on to Slide 6. We quickly summarize the main changes that affected the company's net income in the first quarter of '20 compared to first quarter of '19. As mentioned, net loss totaled BRL 657 million. Net operating revenues increased BRL 163 million. Costs and expenses, including construction costs increased BRL 299 million. Other operating income and expenses, including equity income fell BRL 3.2 million. The financial results varied negatively by, as mentioned before, BRL 1.8 billion. And finally, income tax and social contribution varied positively by BRL 633 million due to the tax losses recorded in the first quarter of '20, mainly explained by worsening in the company financial results.

Let's move to Slide 7. Here, we will comment and highlight some of the social measures implemented by SABESP due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering that the company implemented countless initiatives, we will highlight only some of them, always emphasizing the basic sanitation role played by SABESP at this moment in this specific health crisis. First, initiative is the installation of water in field hospitals. Also since March 24, we have been cleaning the external areas of numerous health facilities, such as hospital, those exactly field hospitals, public spaces, such as nursing homes, social reception centers, police stations, square streets and others, using reused water with an extra dosage of chlorine. In the Metro region of SĂŁo Paulo region alone, approximately 2,000 cleaning actions were carried out. This action was also extended to other 209 municipalities in the state where we operate, totaling approximately 9,000 cleaning activities. It's important to note that for these activities, we counted on donations of chlorine in sufficient volume to support this action and still carry further out other actions and continued actions.

Next initiative is the distribution of water tanks in communities where residents do not yet have a local reservoir in their homes. In total, there were 4,500 water tanks to be delivered. We already delivered 3,800. Around 3,000 units we installed were donated by manufacturers, and SABESP is the body responsible for organizing the distribution.

Another one is we began the installation of washbasins and drinking fountains throughout the state in many places. So the population can wash their hands and have quality of water to drink in many areas. There are 65 cities in the interior and coast covered by this program. In the city of SĂŁo Paulo, 100 washbasins will be installed in the most vulnerable communities, with SABESP also responsible for executing the hydraulic part and the structure built by the -- will be done by the municipality. More than 60 washbasins have already been installed in the Metro region of SĂŁo Paulo, and an additional 160 in the interior and the coast line.

In the last, the main initiatives. The main initiatives we highlighted, SABESP also participates in the volunteer program, select food and hygiene products. 35 tons of food and 17 tons of these hygiene project kits have already been collected and distributed to institutions to take care of the needed population.

Let's now move to the next slide. On this slide, we will comment on the company's initiatives to guarantee the execution of investments. Also for the refinancing of debt maturing this year as well as for the reduction of its FX exposure. As is already widely known, BNDES created a program that provides for the suspension of debt services for 6 months and the corresponding amount being added to the total remaining debt for companies that have contract financing with them. SABESP is certainly already in negotiations with the bank to access the preconditions to obtain this benefit. Also with the BNDES, the company's negotiations to expand and to increase the anticipation of disbursements of financing in progress and to postpone the deadlines for providing and showing the expenditure with name. We are also in negotiations with the CEF. This is the social bank, the Caixa EconĂ´mica Federal to the further payment of the debt service for a predetermined period in a program recently authorized by the FGTS management council and similar to the one already deployed by BNDES.

Moving on, multilateral agencies, as you know, are actively working to support sanitation for health programs that are, by the way, restricted to state-controlled companies such as SABESP. Let's start commenting with the World Bank. We recently signed a 250 million financing agreement in the context of this contract, we are negotiating the participation -- sorry, the anticipation of resources for further verification as well as the application of emergency support actions that allow us to advance additional resources for work and expenses not included in the original scope contracted, but related to this one. So we have also the IDB, the same for the World Bank, in the context of the recently signed $350 million contract, which has already offered to provide support, similar to the expressed by the World Bank. Note important that these 2 contracts above, there's a provision that allows the exchange of currency to dollars to real as we move on with the disbursement. So due to this, the execution may not necessarily increase foreign exchange exposure. But in this case, more specifically, we will comment the reduction in FX exposure further in this presentation.

All added, it's premature to predict the exact amount of funds from these initiatives that will be secured. We can say that given the magnitude of the amounts involved, it should be a significant number to support our CapEx execution and also the company's liquidity. We now are going to comment on the debt management in -- at meeting the company's needs for refinancing service in a year marked by a sharp change in market conditions, particularly impacted by the devaluation of the real.

We start with the 25th debenture issuance by the company settled in -- on April 27. The volume reached BRL 1.45 billion in one series, remunerated or paying CDI's rate at plus 3.6% for a period of 18 months with bullet maturity of principal and interest. Note that this issue was initially scheduled to raise BRL 1 billion by the end of April. With the outbreak of the crisis at the end of March, the market significantly restricted access to investors, leading us and other companies to intensify the demand for liquidity in banks. In this context, the company was not only able to conclude the issue within the initial schedule that is in April, but could also increase the total amount raised by BRL 450 million in such anticipating the inflow of funds, foreseen and planned in its funding and refinancing schedule for this year. So in the context of fundraising, the company has already mandated IDB invest for a loan in reals of BRL 600 million, and has already received authorization from the federal government to issue up to BRL 1 billion in infrastructure the bank. Well, in this point, let's make sure that the company is not announcing, it is issuing an infrastructure debenture. But again, it's now allowed to issue in such -- in a position that in the appropriate time, we will structure an issue but before, obviously, following all the communication and regulation guidelines by CVM.

We would also like to highlight that the company has already contracted several public financing for investment which are in disbursement. And specifically, this year, we had the expectation to disburse BRL 1.1 billion.

In all, if we add what the company has already secured with the resources of the 25th debenturations with the disbursement of financing already contracted with public banks that I mentioned before of BRL 1.1 billion, adding the operation mandated with IDB invest, we reached a value of BRL 3.15 billion. If we also consider the authorization for infrastructure debentures, if the company decides to issue later this year, the value of these funds raise could exceed BRL 4 billion. But also, let's make sure that the company financing actions do not end with these movements. Given the company's robust credit profile, we continue to seek new local and international fundraising opportunity.

Let's now comment on the initiatives to reduce our foreign exchange exposure, following guidelines established by SABESP in relation to foreign exchange exposure presented to you in past conferences. On April 27, the company managed to convert $495 million in dollars to reals from the debt contracted with the Inter-American Development Bank, the IDB, corresponding to the outstanding balance of the financing -- finance contracted to support the Rio TietĂŞ Stage 2 -- Stage 3, sorry, Depollution Program. This step was originally contracted in dollars at LIBOR 3 months plus 0.39% per year with maturity in December 2035.

With the conversion, the debt now is BRL 2.81 billion at the cost of CDI rate plus 0.06% per year, with the semi-annual amortization and maturity unchanged. So this rate, important to note, we have to add a variable margin periodically determined by the bank for loans that are supported by its ordinary capital, which today is set at 80 basis points, which in fact, is the same rate added to the dollar-denominated debt. Note that if we estimate the impact in the first quarter of this year, the conversion to real of the $494 million using the conversion rate for dollar of March 31, we will reach a reduction of 17% on our FX or as you can see in the slide from 55% to 38% FX explosure -- exposure.

To conclude, we highlight that Eurobond 2020 in the amount of $350 million, maturing in December 2020. We will be in stay and observing the market and such to access the best strategy the best timing and the best instrument to carry out its redemption.

Well, said that, on the debt, let's move on to the next slide here. We will comment on the impacts of the economic crisis on SABESP and present measures adopted by the company to preserve liquidity and maintain the positive path of results. Initially, we like to note that the economy was already showing signs of fragility and lagging even before COVID-19 pandemic was granted a status of pandemic, sorry, by WHO. In this sense, COVID-19 inter wise with economic crisis and enhances its effect as we move forward in time. The current situation is marked by the deterioration in the confidence in the cadence of the economic agent and the story of the degree of uncertainty in the economy. There's a reduction in the economic activity in practically all sectors and the GDP slowdown estimates on the go successive downward reduce, including those made by the government. In this scenario of recession, unemployment and expected slowdown in recovery, activity of economic activity, there's a clear sign of a drop in revenues and an increase in delinquency despite nearly 84% of the volume built by the company is in the residential category. In addition, the high volatility of the exchange rate opens the possibility of negative impacts on our financial expenses. On the other hand, it's important to note that SABESP, as a provider of public water supply and sewage service is an essential player in combating the pandemic. In this regard, the company exempts its consumers in the residential, social and favela and residential favela categories from paying water and sewage bill for a period 90 days that is for bills issued as April 1. In contrast, by the way, to the adverse effect on the company's cash brought on by economic crisis and the pandemic there was an increase in revenue from residential customers, except, obviously, from the social and the favela categories and the postponement of the payment of 50% of the regulation fee to January 2021. So that would -- that helped. Where the situation, the company promoted actions with the objective of strengthening its liquidity and maintaining the positive trajectory of its results or maybe path that would be better, among which the following stands out: first, reduction of BRL 360 million in expenses and postponement of BRL 300 million of 2020 planned CapEx. Another is the decrease in the number of employees in the context of a voluntary incentive dismissal program traded and ongoing since 2018. This year, by the end of the year, we expect there should be 998 employees leaving the company. Another is the replacement in the judicial sphere of judicial deposit by its surety bond -- by surety bonds, which will reduce pressure on our cash outflows.

Basically, our -- that will summarize these measures. But before we conclude our presentation, we would like to remind you that on April 1, we issued a notice to the market about ARSESP Resolution 974 regarding the schedule of events for this Third Ordinary Tariff Review. And sequence on April 14, we also published another notice to the market on the ARSESP Resolution 981, that disclosed the regulatory agenda for '20-'21 biannual.

Following the regulatory schedule on May 14, the agency public -- published Public Consultation Notices 05/2020 and 06/2020. The first refers to the definition of the methodology to be used in the calculation of the maximum tariff and the tariff structure. And the second addresses the calculation of the weighted-average cost of capital. As disclosed by the regulator, the walk initially proposed is 7.38%, below our current allowed walk of 8.11%. The company is currently working on the contributions and comments on the published -- over the published materials, and we will -- which our contributions will be sent to our set by the end of the public consultation period in July 3. It's also worth noting that on April 17, ARSESP published 2 deliberations that will contribute to mitigate the financial impacts on the company arising from the crisis caused by the COVID. One is Resolution 985 that temporarily postpones payment of the regulation fee, and the other is Resolution 991, which proposes the postponement of the beginning of the 4-year program of research and technological development for innovation in sanitation and services. So those 2 should give us some help. So that concludes our remarks. Now we'll turn into our Q&A session.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] At this time, we have no questions. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Lilyanna Yang from HSBC.

L
Lilyanna Yang
analyst

Would you mind please giving us a brief overview of how you see the regulator responding to the crisis together with SABESP? You indicated that they came out with a preliminary walk, which in my personal view, seems low at 7.38%, right? And you have been suffering from higher delinquency. You have a little bit of demand destruction with no outcome on the revenue side for now, right? But you do have a rate review that is as early as May 2021. So my question is, do you see this potential delay in the rate review process happening in May as it did happen in the prior 2 rate reviews for SABESP? And if you see any changes recently for the good, for the bad on the regulatory side, many on the approach of the regulator towards the rate review, and how they deal with the crisis, which is unprecedented. Any color on that front will be super helpful.

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Lilly, it's Rui. Just to start, then maybe see if [ Mario ] could give you much color on that, if he's on the line, I believe so. Well, for -- on the first side, we have seen from the technical notes, very recent technical notes, the intention we can seek to those notes is to hurry the process of the tariff review. And to -- in the event of complications due to delays related to the COVID, the economic crisis and so on, the -- some indications of simplification of parts of the process in order to cope with the target to conclude the whole process on May 2021. But this is a preliminary approach that we expected that they will try to make all the efforts in order to conclude it on time, despite all of the problems that we have been suffering, we and the world. So the answer should be to simplify some process rather than to postpone it, at least at this time. I don't know if [ Mario ] has more comments on it or [indiscernible]

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Yes, Rui, I'm on the call. And I think you've summarized it quite well. I don't feel like I could add any anything on that rather than we are ready to comply with all schedule already provided with -- by ARSESP. So we are working towards delivering the information as required right now in May. At the end of May, we should be providing ARSESP with some historical information. And by early July, we should be providing comments on the methodology as well as on our walk. So that's about it at this point in time.

L
Lilyanna Yang
analyst

Okay. Great. And a follow-up question. On your regulatory asset base, there is a certain amount of assets of investments that had not yet been recognized by the regulator in your asset base. Do you think that in May 2021, there would be enough time to get to a review maybe of those assets? Or the idea is to let the disputed parts go and decide about it later when you have more tax and then just make sure that the recent investments of the company are fully reflected in the wrap rather than rediscussing what was invested pre-second rate review.

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Do you want to take Rui, or do you want me to answer that?

Rui, do you want to answer that?

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Yes. It's -- well, from our side, we are doing our best in order to have both processes concluded by May '21. I believe that the hope of SABESP, the expectation of SABESP is the same. I cannot see a sort of interference in one process on the other. We have time. We have problems, of course to evaluate on the field some assets are an example. But on the other hand, the discussion on the previous cuts in our asset basis is -- from our part is well-known problem. We have to go deep on it. We are working hard on it and present our points of view to access. And I believe that both sides want to get it solved the sooner possible.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Harry Doza (sic) [ Hasan Doza ] from WAM.

H
Hasan Doza
analyst

It's Hasan Doza from Water Asset Management. And question for you, Rui. In the past, we had talked about in the -- you had mentioned in the -- in terms of the regulatory developments as per the SABESP calendar, there is a process where there was going to be some deliberations into improving the direct structure for certain customer process. Like right now, you have some customer process paying a lot of tariffs and some customer process paying less, even though, it will be through the 4 to 10 more. So there was some kind of a regulatory process to better align the target structure with the customers who can pay, their ability to pay. I'm just wondering, where is that process right now where the best we can better align the tariff structure for a various customer process. If you have an update on that process, would love to hear one, please.

R
Rui Affonso
executive

So Hasan, we are in the middle of the process to review our tariff structure. So we are working hard on it, several issues in parallel. And yes, the time frame is to the end of this year to have it concluded. So we are working on it. And so we have 3 different -- 2 big movements, the ordinary tariff review, right? The second one is the review of our tariff structure that's in place, we are working on it, discussing with ARSESP and preparing our technical notes. And the third is one point, important point, less behind, that's the -- this call BRL 6 billion left behind of our asset base. So the 3 of them I consider to be running in parallel. So yes, we have a lot of work to do it. I don't know, if [ Mario ] want to comment where at the point we are on this last issue.

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Okay. I can just want a few comments on that. I guess it's important to mention that the methodol that has just been published foresees that we should conclude that work as well as the work on the regulatory assets-based goods by end of this year. So there should be 1 or 2 months -- there should be a few months saying, before the final calculation of the tariff review, which should occur in May. So we have a tight schedule, but we are working towards delivering our comments, our intelligent comments on that. We have already had a few conversations with regulator on the tariff set, but there is no conclusion, nor any indication of what could be the outcome of that. So there is still what to be done, and -- but we are obviously working with them on anything that you add.

H
Hasan Doza
analyst

Rui, if I might, let me ask you one more policy question. As you might be aware in the electric distribution sector, the government is setting up a fund to help with the account receivables that might be a way to alleviate any cash working capital drags for electric distribution companies. I know, obviously, from your perspective, you are a very well-capitalized company. Your credit metrics are very solid. But I was wondering, do you think that kind of a measure that kind of a facility might be useful also for your water sector? And if it is, any thoughts as to what could be done to have a similar facility set up by the government or by the state or the water sector? So if need to be, our companies can draw from that kind of the facility?

R
Rui Affonso
executive

You mean if I'm following you, Hasan, you're asking me if the government, you mean the federal one, right? Could provide funds or conditions -- special conditions for the water and sanitation sector in order to deal with the -- these pandemic economic crises? Is that correct?

H
Hasan Doza
analyst

Yes, specifically. Specifically, how the government is helping the electric distribution sector by setting up the facility, which can help companies if customers are delay in paying their bills. It's like almost like a facility to help with working capital, things like that for the electric distribution companies. And I was just wondering if such help could be extended to the water industry.

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Okay. You are comparing us with the electric -- electricity sector, right?

H
Hasan Doza
analyst

Yes, in terms of the government effort for COVID-19.

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Okay, in the government act, it is. Well, as we commented before, the electricity sector is something -- is quite the -- this electric sector of institutional structure is quite the verge structure of the sanitation, water and sanitation sector. In the sense that we have in that sector, one construction power, the federal one. And hundreds of companies below in generation, distribution and so on. On transmission. In our case, in our sector, it is quite the opposite. We have thousands, 5,700 and something concession power, the municipalities, in some cases, in connection with the states in Metro regions. And then we have just one company that is responsible to provide water and get the sewage and treat it. So we don't see the possibility of the same movement in a sense that the federal government could provide funds as they have announced recently to the whole system in order not to say, rightsize or to compensate their -- the need of rise tariffs in the short trend due to the pandemic and the crisis and the delinquency. And our sector is different because I cannot see the possibility of, say, municipalities or state that's the very bad economic position, fiscal position to provide those kind of funds to compensate on the delinquency or revenues drop in -- of our companies. But in the other side, we have, and we mentioned it during our call, Mario said, it that the multilateral banks and the private banks here, cash economic, BNDES, IDB, the World Bank and the IDB are providing some possibilities to -- in order to, we get more liquidity during the crisis or more access to some special lines of financing. For, say, water treatment and material example, very concrete. That should be very important. We don't have the evaluation to now. But that dozens of negotiations that we have taken with those banks that will help us to cross this bad period. Not -- to summarize it, not -- I cannot see funds coming from the concessional powers because there are thousands of very bad fiscal position. But I can see help from the multilaterals, specifically, and in some cases, from the public banks for the sector.

H
Hasan Doza
analyst

That's helpful. If I can close with one additional question for you, Rui is, can you provide an update on the privatization legislation? Obviously, a lot has changed because of the pandemic COVID in the last 2, 3 months. So where do you think the privatization legislation currently stand? And what do you think is the time frame to potentially revise that legislative process?

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Hasan, you made, as always, a very difficult question to be asked because not us, but nobody knows exactly the interactions of those 2 very tight to connect to crisis. It's difficult to know the extension or the revolve -- remember right now, people in Europe are talking about the second wave or the third wave of this pandemic. So what we have been done is take the measures immediately in order to constrain our budget in order to provide more liquidity to create, say, a buffer of liquidity to cross the period that we can see. Of course, we cannot see longer than this year, it's very difficult. As everybody, it's difficult to forecast like that. But we -- quarter-by-quarter, we are adapting our expectations to the reality and take the measures in anticipation. We have anticipation of the rollover of our debt. We are anticipating the drop on our revenues or the higher delinquency we probably will see in front of us, and adapting time by time, say, every quarter to the reality.

Operator

Our next question is from Lilyanna Yang.

L
Lilyanna Yang
analyst

A quick question, please. Is Caixa EconĂ´mica also giving you some better conditions for payment of the law or it's just mostly BNDES here?

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Mario, I believe that you can answer that question because Caixa EconĂ´mica are negotiated with them also, yes.

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Yes. Yes, Lilly Caixa is one-step back from BNDES. They are both opening the opportunity for companies to weigh the debt servicing for 6 months. Obviously, that the value -- the amount will be added to the total debt. So in that sense, we'll be "funded" financed for the period. But we are, in our case, working with both to make sure that we fit on the conditions precedent. But overall, it is, yes, a very supportive measure for those 2 for the sanitation sector. So yes, there is something out there.

Operator

At this time, it appears to be no further questions. I'll turn the conference back over to SABESP for their final remarks.

M
Mario Sampaio
executive

Rui?

R
Rui Affonso
executive

Yes. I'm here. Okay. We'd like to thank everybody to participate in one more conference call of our results, and a very special one, again, in the middle of a huge crisis and giving you all the information we have that we are dealing with this crisis. And we are open to questions and to numbers in our IR department, please contact Mario, Angela, or all the team. We are open 24 hours a day to help you understand better our actions. Thank you very well and see you next quarter. Bye.

Operator

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.