Troax Group AB (publ)
STO:TROAX
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
197.6564
262
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches SEK.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good day, and welcome to the Presentation of Troax Group AB Fourth Quarter Report 2022. This meeting is being recorded.At this time, I'd like to hand the call over to Thomas Widstrand. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you and thank you for listening in all of you. As usual, I want to report a little bit around and the figures, which had been distributed today of the fourth quarter results that Troax Group AB has been delivering. And I will, as usual, for those of you have followed me before, followed the pattern of the report that we have put on our homepage on our webpage, and you can find it under investors, and you can find it under -- I think it says reports and obviously the fourth quarter 2022.If you don't have an access to this, don't worry because we will be able to go through, I think the main parts in any case. Nevertheless, I'll start then with talking a little bit about the background that as you probably know, most of you, we are into the perimeter guarding business, where we then try to make our customers happy, meaning that they could be safe and sound on solid ground. And just to introduce on the company again.We have 3 different business segments or business areas. And the first 1 and the most, let's call it, international 1 is what we call Machine Guarding, where we then supply fences or guarding and to people who are using them and guarding them for some sort of machines that are being operated, which potentially could be hazardous. And you'll see from this picture that it's a typical example and of where we put up our types of fences and around this kind of production line. That's approximately 60% of our turnover.Next 1 is what we call Warehouse Partitioning, approximately 30% of our turnover and for those of you who are looking at the picture, you will see then that this consists in this example of typical warehouse where we then supply both guarding and which are attached into the pallet rack itself to prevent the pallets from falling down. But you can also see on the right-hand corner that we assemble then for the customers' devices -- that divide and for instance, moving objects like forklift, trucks and with people who are working on the other side with more administrative usage, as an example.And the last 1, which is the next page, we call Property Protection, and that's where actually Troax got started many years ago. While we have done what we call storage solutions, approximately 10% of our turnover, primarily in North European operation, where we done in a more static form of safety putting on cages where we as consumers put in bicycles or ski so whatever we are keeping them for different seasons or what we don't use for the moment. We also sell and install this kind of Property Protection cages, which could be outside of the house that you're living in. So it could be both ways, but this is the most traditional ones that is shown in the picture here.Then we have on the next page, something which we are not really showing in figures, but it's called Automated Warehouse, which actually is a combination of what we do in Machine Guarding with a warehouse port. And we've had a very good development in that, let's call it sub-segment and for a few years, coming from a very low level some years ago to approximately 20% or slightly above that in turnover in 2021. But as we have been indicating several times and communicating, these kind of, at least big international customers, have been most probably overinvesting in 2020 and 2021, which means and that they substantially reduce the projects during 2022. We were still invoicing in number of those projects during the first half year, but in practice and the new orders for new projects more or less disappear in the beginning of '22.And unfortunately, this is quite interesting growing market over time, we think will be rather weak also for 2023 because these kinds of customers have clearly indicated to us that new products will not come surfacing or they will not start any new projects until 2024 or maybe even late. So before we had some ideas that might be something could get started towards the end of '23. But I think today, the conclusion is that -- not very many of these big projects will be started now in '23, it will be postponed until '24. Nevertheless, long-term, this is quite interesting for us, but for 2022 in orders, it is substantially lower than the 20% it was in '21.Next page is just a summary of the sales per region or geographical split -- which has not really changed a lot. What you can see is that the North American forecast has decreased, going from 20% of the turnover in 2021 to 17% in '22. And that is primarily because of -- that we were doing a lot of the big Automated Warehouse projects in the U.S., especially in 2021. On the contrary then Mainland Europe, which is our home market, has grown a bit. So you could say then that it's still rather stable, but a little lower in North America, a little bit higher than turnover figures, at least in percentage wise when you look at Mainland Europe.So on the total then just to summarize 2022, we have reached more or less the same orders received as 2021. And then, I should remember you -- at least we should try to recall and that 2021 was a year where we had a substantial increase. We had more or less 40% organic growth. So to reach the same type of figure in orders that we had in 2021 is actually a good achievement, bearing in mind and that we have to grow into new costs, which is substantially [indiscernible] before. We are helped by price increases, well -- of course it's stressed, but nevertheless, I think that's not such a bad achievement.On the sales side, we have grown primarily because of the big orders that we got towards the end of 2021, which have been delivered and invoiced during 2022, so that's why we have this higher figure on sales and orders. But otherwise, basically, the conclusion is the same. We've been increasing on the sales with more or less the price increase. Operating profit it's slightly lower, primarily because it's been quite a turbulent year with the steel price. And obviously, then we are transferring over steel price increases or other cost increases to our customers. But of course, there's a certain time delay because, firstly, we have an order backlog that we are delivering out, which we are not really want to change.And then of course on top of that, where we have outstanding quotes, which are or valid for a certain period of time. So we saw during the latter part of 2022 that we were starting to get covered for the steel price increases, while we lost during a period of '22 some margins because of this. Hence, the operating margin and seen as EBITDA is down 18% compared to 21% last year, which is primarily then coming from this with a steel price increase and the delay, let's say, in converting this to our own customers.Earnings per share and following obviously the same thing so it's slightly lower where our standard proposal for the Annual General Meeting will be to increase the dividend per share since we have a very stable balance sheet and the equity has continued to grow and we see then that we should adhere to that the principal of having approximately 50% as dividend should be valued also for '22.Going to the next page, which sets the year in brief. You can see then that there has been a substantial increase on the graph to your right in the turnover, which I already explained. We are hovering around 20% of volume, which is also our target. If we now calculate with EBITDA, maybe should be a little bit higher, but we are around that level. So the 18% that we received in 2022, it's a little bit lower than what we should like to have as going back to the target. But nevertheless, seeing on this turbulence during the year, we think that this is an acceptable figure than for the whole year, even if, of course, we will do everything what we can to come back to the target now during 2023.And our relative market share is supporting a 3x bigger than #2 player. We are in 45 countries and if you look at the compounded annual growth, we've grown with some 11%, 12% depending on how we calculate per year in the last years. We are normally talking about that there is a market increase of some 4% to 6% per year over business cycle regardless of what we are doing. And on top of that, we normally should take market share. So over a long period of time, we have been talking about. It's realistic than to say that we've been growing with some 8% to 10% per year over a business cycle.Going to the next page, core financial targets, which is a summary where we are simply from a figure point of view, KPI point of view, going back to the market growth, which I just touched upon now, we've been growing organically 12% this year. However, there I must stress this is primarily a price that has been very little then real volume increases.And the M&A side, which we've done during the year are rather small, so that's added 1% or something like this to our turnover. But the primarily growth is coming from the pricing. Profitability, as I said 20% is our target. We reached approximately 18%. So we have a little way to go now to come back to the 20%, which I think is doing good.On the capital structure, we have a very good situation. Our balance sheet is very strong. And our net debt in relation to EBITDA should not exceed 2.5 times. So we are at the end of last year 1.6 times, so we have an excellent opportunity to finance possible acquisitions, I would say that the real problem is more to get the right acquisition on the table.And if we get that, I think that within limits of course that will not be a big problem to finance the acquisition, as I've said, it's more, as I said to find a right one. And dividend, as we said, we should have a policy to payout 40% to 50% and the proposal for this year is 52%.Then I go to the next page, which is some sort of summary for more directed to quarter four. And as expected, and we were hampered by the much lower activities within Automated Warehouse. We knew this. So we will, of course, try to reduce the variable costs in our manufacturing units, but it's difficult to entirely compensated.So we've had little bit over negative impact in quarter four and due to the fact that the volume is going through our manufacturing units. So we're not from the level that we actually would have wanted to compared to the first half year. Nevertheless positive I would say is that besides the Automated Warehouse, we haven't seen any sign or any decrease of customer demands.On the contrary, we have seen a very stable demand in all areas. And I think that's what I would have been in '23, which we will have to come back to is, nevertheless, a good sign and that short-term, at least today, nothing wrong, basically with the demand except for Automated Warehouse, which is something, which we have known now for quite a long time.Sales invoice is influenced by the steel price with approximately 10% in the fourth quarter. So when you just look at the sales invoice figures, you have to deduct the 10% to get apples-by-apples by comparing the same quarter and the same figures of last year. The steel price, which obviously is influencing, have been much more stable after the summer period and actually been going down.So I will say that during the fourth quarter, we've had a positive influence on the margin side based on these. So when you look at the total margin, you can say that we have not maybe got the full effect of the lower steel prices, but we have gained a major part of that. So we still have something to gain now in quarter one. But I think the biggest part of the year, that a recovery of steel price and the corresponding transfer of customer price from us to our customers that have been implemented during quarter four.We had a reasonable EBITDA result and also margin in quarter four, seen in the light, as I call it turbulent -- it's a turbulent situation and also the lower volume produced in our manufacturing units. We had a quite good volume in the first half year than in January, since we had done a few of these big projects coming from '21 in Automated Warehouse to be delivered in '22. But since they were delivered and during first half year, this of course meant that you didn't get exactly the same sort of volume to go through than the manufacturing processes in the quarter three and quarter four.Gross margin are still in quarter four a little bit on the low side and this is then coming from this that we had a little bit low manufacturing volumes compared to the, what we normally have, And we were also trying to reduce of course inventory since things are stabilizing from a lead time point of view, and for once also, we've made an accrual for obsolescence in inventory, connected and with Automated Warehouse demand that was going away.Normally, we have no problems with obsolescence or inventory valuation because we are normally quite good in planning and delivering what the customer wants. And we don't normally have high stocks, but it's an exception though, unfortunately exceptions that was too high inventory then connected with the big orders that were expected for the Automated Warehouse, where they were a long lead time, so we were trying of course to cope with the customer demands.And since we tried to be prudent, there's nothing wrong with this material. So when the demand will hopefully start to come back, we can use exactly these, kind of material while we don't want to have it fully valued in our books at the end of the year. So that's why we took the third quarter it's a bit of prudent conclusion, a prudent decision and to do accrual, which of course, also have negatively influenced on the gross margin.We have had good cooperation with our customers with the pricing. So I wouldn't say though anything new coming up in the fourth quarter. If it goes to the different regions, which I'll come back in a little while also, you can see then that the, especially in the Nordic region and what we call new markets, we saw a market and outside of the European and North American markets, I would say we've had a quite good sales levels. So you can see that in those regions the demand and the penetration of the markets are quite -- actually quite positive.Earnings per share were a bit lower, partly your working capital is now also on the expected lower levels. Inventory, as I said, we have reduced. So we have had quite good cash flow in the quarter. We, of course, normally get that also when business levels are going down a little bit, but I would say that still part of this is coming from that where we also reduced the inventory and things connected with that in the growth.Going to the acquisition we did two years ago in Poland, Natom Logistics. This quarter actually has been negatively influenced by substantially lower activity from the Automated Warehouse. So Natom has had a very good development, and we are very happy with that. But in the fourth quarter, was not -- on the same level, based on of course that, they are very focused on Automated Warehouse. So we are reducing, of course, on the number of people and working in that operation.The other small acquisition we did during this year, or rather during '22. So it was in Spain, the Claitec. They continue to develop well, had some problems with lead times on some components, but they were in track what's going up pretty well and we are quite happy with the development so far. And it's early days, but the small company in Sweden. We bought Swedish Cykelrum or Svenska Cykelrum in Swedish, was also developing quite well so, so far, so good. And towards the end of the quarter, we then started to do another expansion of the manufacturing facility in Hillerstorp, so we're expanding on the physical space in order to prepare for future expansion on all of our machine capacity.Going to the next page, the financial highlights don't need to go through that very much. I think you can see for yourself that the three-milestone were unfortunately in orders slower than last year '21 I mean. That was the influenced and positively by this huge order for Automated Warehouse. The margin is fairly starting to improve now, not yet coming up to a level where we want to, but we can see then that it's going the right direction.And the same with the EBIT or EBITDA margin that we now wants to promote more, since that is showing, maybe a little bit better picture of the operational efficiency. It's still a little bit on the low side, but we have good hopes that this will start to improve further during next year in '23 as long as, of course, the volume is well and it's not negative.Going to the next page, regional development, I've already said that they were quite strong in the Nordic region and the new markets. The real deficit is in North America. And that was because we have very good orders standing in 2021 for Automated Warehouse and obviously, this comes back now, since there were no orders at all. So we are trying of course, to compensate this step-by-step, but since this is -- the segments which keep growing, so substantially during the short period of time, it's difficult to compensate that also with other customers during a short period of time. But over time, I'm convinced we will be able to do that.So totally it was a bit, I would say, it will be a week on the order side whereas on the sales side it was more or less on the same level as last year albeit helped by price increases. So before we come over to the conclusions and the Q&A session, maybe just few more comments -- more on a conclusive side that many good orders still, despite and that the Automated Warehouses has been weak. We will see that in the other segment is continuing to have good demand and we received good orders.There has been a reasonable development in results. You could argue, of course, then that it's lower than the year before, which is correct. But I think we have order clear and understanding why and that we also during this turbulent year from a sales point of view, have tried in a positive way to help our customers with a little bit easier price increases step-by-step, so that they could get used to the situation which didn't hamper them too much short term and hopefully this will give us some goodwill going forward.The investments that we've been doing in Natom, by increasing them in the machine capacity all more or less finished and the integration of the Claitec is going on in a positive way. So there is some sort of summary of the summary. We see that the total development in the quarter was reasonable. But we are very clear over that but we want to continue to come back to the previous levels both in gross margins and EBITDA. But we do think that the demand from Automated Warehouse will continue to be weak during 2023.So before leaving over to you, I can just say that when you go through the growth, factors which is the next page, it's the same as it's been before. It's driven a lot by the industrial automation, robotization. We get a little bit also some positive things, onshoring or closer manufacturing or regional manufacturing compared to before, but I will say that the steel trend is that the main part for us is the increased industrial automation.As for now, the growth in e-commerce doesn't really help us, but we think from '24 and onwards, it will come back maybe not to the fantastic levels we had during 2020 and 2021. But nevertheless, we do see this as a positive growth potential and going forward. The next 1, are just these things you've seen before. So, the next one is explaining how our production units are structured and what they are producing in the volumes. The next one is showing them the different brands that we are going to the market with. We are of course and promoting ourselves -- as we are helping customers since 1955 and we're doing things tend to do so, since we are the market leader and we intend to stay ahead of the competition.So going then to say tomorrow we are still focused a lot of the environmental issues and as an example of that, you can now find the CO2 consumption the main article available on our webpage which is a sign for the customer and if they want to purchase something, which is -- might be sensible from CO2 consumption point of view.So with this, I would like to stop and just saying that, we will continue now to let's say, promote our leadership. And I think we will have some interesting issues to talk to you about when we meet then in -- after the first quarter. I think we have the telephone conversation, end of April or something like that.So thank you very much for listening in. Now it's time for the Q&A session so please go ahead and open your questions -- open your telephone, give your questions indirectly to me.
[Operator Instructions] Now the first question comes from Gustav Berneblad from Nordea.
It's Gustav from Nordea. If I understood you correctly we should not expect any further inventory write-downs and this was more of a temporary thing, right?
Yes, this is something we have -- I don't think we have done this during my 15 years. And I was very surprised if we do anything more going forward.
Perfect. And also when it comes to gross margin here heading into 2023, can we expect any new type of headwinds going into the year or should we assume a further recovery in the margin, as we now also get a bit of support from the steel prices?
Yes, I think our basic alternatives or basics knowledge is that we should come back to where we had been before. And that's what we're working towards, then of course there is a question, what could be short-term over the volume development, which is of course nevertheless crucial, because if we don't get enough volume, we will not get the nice recovery of fixed costs. So that might be a little bit a question mark for this. But besides the volume issue, we are not, let's say, we will not come back.
Perfect. And then regarding the sort of cutting of variable costs, primarily in Chicago and Poland, how much can we expect in cost savings on an annual basis?
I don't think we want to give out the figure. I can just say, we're trying to, let's say, follow the volume development based on what you've seen in orders and so forth, we try to follow that at least on the variable cost side. So the variable cost side should be compensated, but you will not get the full compensation and if you include also the fixed cost obviously.
Okay, perfect. And then just 1 last 1 here, new markets saw solid growth in the order intake in the quarter. Can we expect any further acceleration here following the reopening in China or how do you see it?
Yes we were, of course, a bit hampered by the turbulence in China, not only in fourth quarter, but also earlier during the year. But since China is still 1 of ours, let's call it, not major market. I don't think I would be exaggerating influence of China. But if you really compare apples-with-apples, yes, we are expecting, of course, an improved figures from China and other parts of Asia in quarter 1 and quarter 2, compared to what we had in quarter 4. That's correct.
We will now take our next question from Gustav Osterberg from Carnegie.
So you were quite clear on the demand trends and outlook within Automated Warehouse. So I was just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about the demand, the trends and the dynamics for the remainder of the business. I mean, you mentioned a decent demand level still, but how should we think about cyclicality and larger factors, so to speak, going forward?
It's good, Gustav, it's a good question. As I tried to say, we haven't seen any reduction in demand from customers. And so what we all write in or see in the newspapers, so that a potential let's say, reduction of demand it will remain somewhere in the future, could very well be, so, but when we talk to our customers, they are saying more or less than that.Yes, for the coming 1 or 2 quarters, we have good projects and we will fulfill them. So there is no problem in short-term, but of course, when we come to the second half year of '23, they don't know how it will go with the new projects or from a CapEx point of view. So, that of course the question will come we developed. We haven't seen, as I said, any reduction of demand yet.I think there will be some sort of reduction in my -- if I speculate little bit during second half year. But our gut feeling and you can only take it as it gut feeling is that, there won't be a substantial increase in demand. I think there were good possibilities for us to let's say survive this sort of maybe little bit dip in demand during half year or whatever it can be. But it will surely be difficult for us to have a substantial volume increase during 2023 that's further clear.
Appreciate the color there. And just a follow-up, because we are obviously reading about trends of the shorter supply chains and near-shoring or front-shoring et cetera, are you seeing any discussions with customers on those trends or is it too early to speak of such activity yet?
We have seen some time customers or potential customers talking about that we have seen very few real effects in orders yet. I think there will be a number of those coming in during 2023. However, I'm still saying the same thing I've been saying before and that is, for Troax, as a whole, this won't have this major impact because even if you transfer production from Japan or wherever, China to Europe or to the North America, we are still -- we're delivering. So it doesn't really change the world for us. But of course, it's really put us to test, all new CapEx that customers say that we are in all good. So in that sense, you could say it's positive, but to answer your question, no, we haven't seen any substantial changes in the fourth quarter based on this.
Okay. And then a final question on the pricing environment. You mentioned that you're now catching up with prices and you see that in the gross margin, which obviously improved sequentially. Did you mention the year-on-year effect on pricing? Is it still around 12% or has it come down slightly now?
I think you can calculate with approximately 10% for the fourth quarter as some sort of average.
Yes and the sequential development of prices is down now, right?
Yes.
So, I mean it's more a base effect that is still keeping -- yes, okay.
Yes.
Those were all questions from my side.
And our next question comes from Daniel Lindkvist from [indiscernible]. Please go ahead.
Daniel from Danske Bank. So I have -- most of my questions answered already being a bit slow on the star one. But just to take on some details the obsolete inventory, is that still kept in the inventory or is it recycled? So could it be --
No, it's still kept in inventory. I tried to say that it's perfectly, let's say, good quality products that can be sold at a later stage. So it's just accrual from an accounting point of view that we see and it won't be sold probably in the next 12 months. So we have to make it some sort of accruals, but it's kept in the inventory.
And then you said on the Automated Warehouse, you were talking about starting of orders in 2024 and perhaps earlier on, if we are lucky. Could that imply that there could be in the order book say 2023 for deliveries or early 2024 at the best store?
Yes, there could be, but the messages we got now from these kind of, at least, the big international customers, saw that, they won't start any new projects until going into '24. So if you compare with what I said half a year ago, they postponed it another half a year or something like that.
But they are saying it with more certainty now than before. So later, but more certain or what's your take?
This is impossible for us to have an opinion over, Daniel. We think that they been caught a little bit with this, what I call, over-investing before and now they are waiting for the customer demand to pick up. So, I think that they are also a little bit in the midst how they will see this. They are trying to keep things open both with suppliers like us that we could maybe start earlier, but it could also be that it's further delayed, so both alternative can be a viable unfortunately.
And then just on the gross margin, if we take away those, the obsolete inventory, then you end up at some slightly below 47% in this quarter?
Yes.
So long-term, the talking about some 48% maybe initially and then going for 49% or something that we had prior to the?
It's correct.
Yes, so that's still your long-term…
That's still our ambition. And I think that's still valid. Yes, correct.
Cool. So -- and so over the long-term, nothing has changed with these -- with the normalization of gross margins?
No.
And the normalization of some 7% to 10% or something in?
No, correct. Correct.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Anna Widstrom from Handelsbanken.
So 3 questions from my side. Firstly, should we expect stable price effect from the current levels going into 2023 or should we expect, because as you mentioned, the prices are sequentially a bit sound, more -- so should we basically expect the stable level from the current levels, or do you think there is probability we see a higher or lower prices for 2023?
There are rumors that steel prices will go up a little bit during '23 or first half year, depending of course on the general demand in the market. So there are arguments for solutions. I think the basic scenario, we're working with right now is that there will be more or less stable pricing.But we could see a scenario where both we have to increase prices further, and maybe then where things are going back not to normal, where it was before, but maybe reduce from today, it could be a scenario where we are also slightly reducing. But I think most likely you could expect now similar sort of price level that you have today.
Okay. And if we talk a bit on the minor players within e-commerce, and you say that, that demand is still quite good. Would you say that that is flat volume -- volume-wise or do you see some volume growth from the minor players within e-commerce?
We see some volume growth Anna and -- I wouldn't say at the market is very good. But we see volume increase in that sector. But of course those projects are also mall compared to the big ones. So you don't really see it when you consolidate everything.But it's a good sign for the future, because it means that the market and the customer base, is growing which of course for us and others it's good going forward. So I'm quite positive on that, but from a purely figure point of view, short-term, you shouldn't reading too much into it.
Okay, great. And my last question is on acquisitions. Given that we are seeing a slightly weaker market, if we include the bigger e-commerce happening. And have you seen some new interesting sort of opportunities already or adjacent to that, it needs to take a bit longer for -- opportunities to arise?
Normally it takes a little bit longer, yes. It doesn't go that quick. Normally you have to have sometime over a little bit weaker demand situation. And if you exclude the Automated Warehouse, it is not reducing. So I don't think you should expect that this sort of expectation and the lower demand will increase the number of potential M&A.Obvious we can short-term. But the risk, it will come, I'm convinced over that. So we are pretty sure that there will be a few objects to evaluate too in 2023, but I can't say anything more specific than that.
[Operator Instructions] As there are no further questions in the queue, I'd like to hand the call back over to Thomas for any additional or closing remarks. Over to you, sir.
Thank you very much for listening in. We appreciate your questions. So I look forward very much as I said to talk you or have a discussion, so to speak, again after the first quarter, which we may end of April. Thank you very much. Take care and looking forward to next time. Bye-bye
Thank you, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, you may now disconnect.