S

Surgical Science Sweden AB
STO:SUS

Watchlist Manager
Surgical Science Sweden AB
STO:SUS
Watchlist
Price: 126.6 SEK -1.48%
Market Cap: 6.5B SEK
Have any thoughts about
Surgical Science Sweden AB?
Write Note

Earnings Call Analysis

Q3-2023 Analysis
Surgical Science Sweden AB

Surgical Science Q3 Earnings Reveal Growth Amid Challenges

Surgical Science, while navigating the aftermath of an October 7 tragedy in Tel Aviv, reported minimal impact on business, with strong team cohesion and continued operations. Q3 brought a modest 3% year-over-year growth to SEK 210 million in net sales, or 1% when excluding foreign exchange effects. The highlight was in license revenues, which leapt by 38%, markedly outpacing the market's installed base and procedural growth, which registered at 13% and 19% respectively. Educational Products sales fell 9%, but adjusting for an exceptional prior U.S. order and a sluggish China market, the segment grew robustly elsewhere. Profit margins significantly improved, with profit per share skyrocketing by 65%. Despite uncertain macroeconomics, the company remains positive, observing signs of recovery in China and staying on course for their 2026 goals.

Steady as She Grows: A Closer Look at Surgical Science's Q3 Performance

Upon examining the company's performance in Q3, CEO Gisli Hennermark and CFO Anna Ahlberg highlighted a period of modest revenue growth at 3%, hampered by strong comparisons to the prior year due to a significant U.S. order in 2022 and foreign exchange effects, which when excluded, leaves us with a mere 1% increase in net sales. Despite the deceleration in overall sales, the educational products segment managed to climb 28% year-over-year when set apart from the previous large U.S. order and a weak performance in China. On a brighter note, the Industry/OEM sector surged by 26%, drawing 40% of total revenue, signifying a diversified and strengthening portfolio.

A Shifting Product Ecosystem Towards Software

Revenue streams show a mixed bag of plays, with education product sales experiencing a decline but countered by an impressive rise in software sales within the Industry/OEM segment. Licensing revenue is particularly interesting, marking an increase by 38%, although it carries a level of unpredictability due to the timing and nature of license purchases. These variations in sales contribute to a level of 'lumpiness' across quarters. Nevertheless, strong service revenues, tied to the growing installed base, are a stabilizing factor amidst these fluctuations and add to a recurring revenue profile.

Margin Improvements Amidst Market Challenges

The cost structure and margin story show resilience, with gross margins improving to 69%, up from 67% the previous year, credited to a favorable product mix and strong license revenues. Selling, general, and administrative expenses held steady, tracking closely with previous quarters. Research and development (R&D) costs were lower due to developmental revenue activities offsetting some operational costs. The discussion hints at a potential inclination toward capitalizing more R&D costs in the future, which may lead to lumpiness in expenses quarter over quarter.

Global Operations and the China Outlook

Operationally, the company is working on greater production integration across its locations, particularly between their primary assembly site in Tel Aviv and other facilities in Gothenburg and Seattle. CEO Hennermark's hands-on insights from recent China visits suggest a reverberating positivity about demand for their educational products and a glimpse of improving market conditions, even as macroeconomic uncertainties linger globally.

Navigating Through Financial Prudence and M&A Opportunities

Addressing the sizable cash position exceeding SEK 600 million, the management relayed their strategic approach to M&A, emphasizing right-fit acquisitions and integrations that respect the company's core goals and culture. They indicated a thoughtful decision-making process, resting with the Board, around the potential for cash returns to shareholders. The prospect of a share buyback was discounted as the company is listed on the First North Growth Market, which holds no such provision.

Confident Outlook Tied to Industry Growth Despite Setbacks

With confidence, Hennermark looks toward the future, stating their goal of growing educational products by 10% to 15% annually. Despite some delays in robotic surgery trials, they remain committed to their sales target for 2026, banking on the overall growth of the surgical robotics industry and not on any particular player's timeline. They foresee hospitals continuing to adopt robotic technologies, a narrative sustained by strong surgeon endorsements and improved patient outcomes.

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2023-Q3

from 0
G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Good morning, everyone. My name is Gisli Hennermark. I'm the CEO of Surgical Science, and I will take you through a few general comments about our Q3 report that we released this morning. Then Anna Ahlberg, our CFO, will drill down a bit on the numbers, and then we will open up for questions.

Surgical Science has about half of its team in Tel Aviv, Israel. That's about 130 people out of our approximately 260 employees. And what happened on October 7 was a terrible tragedy on so many levels. We are okay physically, but we're not okay on a different level. This has been a trauma for many of our team members, and everyone are affected deeply on an emotional level even if physically okay.

However, the business is very much usual in the unusual or abnormal times. And when I say that, I want to go back to -- I got the first message early Saturday morning about the terrorist attack. By Saturday late afternoon, we've been in touch with all of our employees. Sunday, we opened up the office. In the Middle East, the work week is Sunday to Thursday. And on Monday morning, we had full production in our Tel Aviv facility. We shipped simulators by air. The Ben Gurion airport has been open all the time, and we actually shipped even more simulator than we planned to in October.

And I'm deeply touched on how this company really have come together, and we've supported each other like one company in these difficult times. And people are traveling in and out of Tel Aviv. So in terms of the business impact so far, it's very marginal. All of our customers pretty much are outside of Israel. So it's development and assembly. There are big activities there and the impact is more on some logistical costs are up. We've taken some precautions or hedging by moving finished simulators to our U.S. and Swedish warehouses.

And we also have some absence due to colleagues who are called up to serve in the Israeli Defense Forces. But those are primarily the junior, more younger men and women of our company and it's so far a smaller number of employees. But this has been emotionally a tough month. And going forward, we actually don't judge or can see any major business impact as of now. And I included some pictures there from the team during October in our Tel Aviv office. Extremely proud of them.

Now moving on and looking a little bit high level on how we performed as a business in Q3. We can start by looking at the overall growth, 3% in Q3 compared to Q3 in 2022. That sounds a bit anorectic actually, thinking about what Surgical Science shareholders have been used to for many, many quarters of higher growth than that. But it is actually a growth quarter. Because if we look beneath the surface of those 3% year-over-year growth, we can see that the big drop is in Educational Products, in simulator sales in Educational Products. That decreased by 12% and year-over-year, Q-over-Q.

And actually, the groundbreaking $6.7 million order that we received from a leading U.S. hospital chain in May 2022, the bulk of deliveries was made in Q3. It was about SEK 40 million. And our important Chinese market that we've commented on before kept on being sluggish and slow in Q3 2022. So if you take those SEK 40 million and you add in an unknown sort of year-over-year drop in China, simulator sales of SEK 15 million actually means that, everything else combined, had a very strong growth in Q3 in Educational Products.

Our service revenue has a good strong healthy growth of 20%. And most importantly, our license revenues when the surgical robotics companies are compensating us through royalties and subscriptions from using our IP, they grew by 38% in Q3 compared to 2022. And actually, if we look then at the market leader, Intuitive Surgical, they grew their installed base by 13%. And for us, perhaps the most importantly, the procedural growth, meaning utilization, how many procedures, how many operations are being done with this installed base, that grew by 19%. And Surgical Science and our simulation licenses, that grew by 38%.

So we keep on outgrowing the market. And if we look up to the right-hand side there, we can see that the first 3 quarters of 2023 were well ahead of the full year 2022 for license revenues. So I would characterize this still as a growth quarter even if the combined top line growth was not that high.

Moving down to more good news is that the gross margin improved not only year-over-year compared to 2022, but it also improved over the last quarter of Q2 by 1.5%. And that doesn't sound maybe so much. But still, if we then take into account that license revenue in Q2 2023 was 35% of the overall revenue and in Q3 it was 26%, that's 9% difference. That means everything else had a much stronger profitability. And here, we see price increases starting to bite. We see a more favorable product mix. We see some more development revenues. And we also see that we are able to sell more software on our simulators, improving the average selling price and the gross margin. So I'm very pleased with that.

And if we then sort of look at profit margins overall. I mean, they go up. It doesn't matter how you count. If you look at the EBIT of 24% or what we believe is the best measurement of profitability for our company, adjusted EBIT, where we add back amortizations and potential write-downs to surplus values connected with acquisitions, that was 27%. EBITDA was 31%. So very good profit margins across the line. Actually, if we drill down all the way to profit per share for our shareholders, that grew by a whopping 65% in Q3.

So we do feel that we are on track for our 2026 goals, despite what is a strong headwind in macroeconomics. It is tougher out there. I think everyone who are involved with selling to health care industry can attribute to -- and tell you about the fact that it is tougher times. But we see some positive signs now in China where, again, our comments are related to Educational Products, where it has not really taken off after the pandemic. But we start seeing some positive signs there.

But there is a higher level of uncertainty moving into Q4 here and very much related to the overall economy. We typically have a Q4 positive effect, basically, customers sort of spending their budget if they have any left. And that's sort of the big question here. How much money is left in Q4? But overall, we feel a very positive feeling. And also, the accumulated revenue growth for 2023 is still very healthy and well in line with our trajectory towards our 2026 goals.

And with that, I'm going to hand over to Anna, who will dig a bit deeper into the numbers, and then we will open up for questions.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Great. Thank you, Gisli. So we go back to the top of the income statement and start with revenues.

As we heard, net sales was SEK 210 million for Q3. And again, this is a weaker increase than we have seen before, but measured then against a very strong Q3 last year with the majority of the U.S. order of USD 6.7 million, which we received in May 2022 was accounted for. We had USD 2.1 million in Q2 last year, USD 3.9 million then, the majority of the order in Q3, and then USD 0.7 million in Q4 of last year. So the increase then for Q3 this year, the totally reported increase, 3%. And if we then exclude FX effects, it was 1%. We have the majority of our revenues in U.S. dollar, approximately 80%.

Looking at the different business areas. Educational Products sales then was down 9%. But again, if we exclude the U.S. order to the main hospital chain that we received in 2022, sales was actually up 28%. And then also taking into account that China was weak, this means that the total of all other markets was strong. Industry/OEM was up 26% and accounted for 40% of our total revenues. In Q3 last year, it was 33%. Again, license revenues was up 38%. And both development revenues and simulator sales within Industry/OEM, they were higher than the previous quarters of this year in 2023, and I will get back to that on the next slide.

First, just looking at also the full period, January through September. Year-to-date, we then showed revenues of SEK 656 million and that was an increase with 19%, excluding FX, 13%. And for the respective business area, Educational Products was up 12%, so within our range of 10% to 15% that we have in our financial goals. Industry/OEM was up 31%.

On this slide, we see the split and development of our 4 different revenue streams. In the interim report, you also have these revenue streams divided by business area, so a bit more detailed in the report. For the quarter then, we see an increase quarter-over-quarter for all revenue streams except simulators. Again, license revenues was up 38%. We had sales of -- revenues of SEK 56 million. It was lower compared to Q2. But in this case, it is more relevant to compare against the same quarter last year. We have described the lumpiness of these revenues since we have more customers now where we receive license revenues from and they purchase the licenses more in batches. So not tied to exactly when the robot with the simulation on is being sold, which makes it a bit more lumpy between the quarters.

Also, actually, there is a certain lumpiness also tied to the subscription part. We have both more -- we have different type of revenues within the license revenues, more perpetual tied to the specific robot and more recurring tied to subscriptions. And these are also actually a bit bumpy because they are usually up for renewal once a year, and the number of licenses that are up for renewal varies a bit between the quarters. So for the quarter, license revenues was then 26% versus 20% in Q3 of last year.

Looking at simulator sales. They were on par for industry OEM, if we look at the different business areas, but down then within Educational Products as we have discussed. And also for simulator sales within Industry/OEM, they were a lot stronger if we look at Q1 and Q2 of this year. They were significantly up.

Development revenues, also then higher again and also higher -- a bit higher than last year. This is connected to the higher sales of simulators within Industry/OEM. The development revenues are both tied to robotics projects, but also then on software projects tied to sales of simulators to the OEMs. As Gisli mentioned, service revenues grew nicely and they are stable and growing with installed base.

Moving then to the cost side. Gross margin, as mentioned, was up 69% versus 67% in Q3 last year. And if we then compare to Q3 last year, we had a larger share of license revenues in this quarter, which has a positive effect. If we compare to Q2, again, as mentioned, then we had a higher share of license revenue. So -- and that usually then affects it very positively. But still, we were able to increase the margin, which we are very, very happy about. The product mix was favorable with a higher average sales price and we had good development projects with good margins.

On the cost side, it might be a bit more relevant to compare to the previous quarters this year instead of comparing to Q3 last year. So looking at both sales and admin costs, they were both in line with Q2.

Looking at R&D, the costs were lower, but it also depends on what we work on during the quarter. When we have more development revenues, which we had in this quarter, we move the costs for doing that work up to COGS, which then -- because it's the same thing. Also in this quarter, we capitalized some more costs than previous quarters.

On the line other, I just want to mention that in this quarter, we had an effect from our options programs. That was a cost of SEK 3.4 million. Q3 bears the full effect for the Swedish part of our new options program, which was approved by the AGM in May. Then we also have an IFRS 2 effect -- I won't go into all the details, but we do have an effect that comes every quarter then related to the Israeli and U.S. parts of the program. EBIT was almost SEK 51 million for the quarter, which meant the 24%, 3 percentage points stronger than Q3 last year.

Looking at our organization then. We had approximately the same number of employees going out of Q3 as going out of Q2. We were then 259, now we are 260 people. And as talked about half of them are in Israel, approximately 1/4 are in Sweden and the rest in the U.S. as well as some other countries.

Adjusted EBIT, where we have our financial goal of 40% in 2026. We showed an adjusted EBIT of SEK 57 million, which was then a margin of 27% for the quarter. And year-to-date, we have a margin of 26%.

Finance net and taxes. We have no financial loans in the group. So usually, this is primarily revaluation items on this line, on the finance net line. However, for this quarter, the majority of this item was interest on our bank balances. The U.S. dollar moved very little going if we look at June 30 compared to September 30, which means that the valuation items were very small in the quarter. Our taxes are to a certain extent, affected by the fact that we have no carryforwards both in Sweden and in the U.S., which means that the tax rate overall then becomes a bit lower. The net result for the quarter was SEK 47 million.

The last slide I want to show you is on cash flow. Cash flow from operating activities for the quarter was SEK 53 million. Change in working capital was negative SEK 15 million. However, we see, if we compare to the last quarter, that inventory decreased a bit. It has been increasing over the last 2 quarters due to the fact that we are -- I mean, we are growing and gearing up for higher production, but it was reduced a bit during Q3. And also, very nice to see that accounts receivables actually continues to decrease.

The gray line there is accounts receivables as a percentage of rolling 12-month sales and you see the decreasing trend, which is very nice. The fact that change in working capital was negative is due to the fact that short-term liabilities also decreased and by a bit more than. Cash flow from investing activities and from financing activities, not much to mention there. Nothing out of the ordinary. And we then ended the quarter with a cash position of SEK 606 million.

And with that, I think we can open up for questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Viktor Högberg from Danske Bank.

V
Viktor Högberg
analyst

Could you say something about how you see the robot landscape developing? Any changes versus when you put out your 2026 financial targets, the first time, almost 2 years ago? And also, any changes compared to when you had your Capital Markets Day in February? And I have a couple of follow-ons after that one.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Thank you, Viktor. We think that the robotic surgery market is developing well. Of course, economic times are -- the macroeconomics are a bit different now than a year ago. But we see strong growth. We see strong interest from hospitals. We commented a bit extra around the industry, the robotic-assisted surgery industry as a whole in our Q2 report. And there, we noted that Asian companies have sort of surprisingly quickly closed a bit of the gap towards their Western counterparts.

But this is good news for Surgical Science because we have several customers in Asia, and they also need the best simulation for patient safety of their end users. So there hasn't been a lot of changes or any significant changes despite the headwind in the economy. We were very happy to see when Intuitive reported a few weeks ago that their procedural growth was 19%. I mean, this is the #1 thing we look at, how much more operations are being done with robotic-assisted surgery. Because if there are a lot of operations, then you need a lot of training, basically.

And we can also add more content to those customers. And when I say those customers, we have about 15 customers licensing our software for simulation purposes. Like you mentioned, J&J had a short update a couple of days ago. and they will host an event by the end of this year. And they basically said that they plan to initiate in-human trials second half of 2024. So I don't think there was a lot of substantially new data there either. So that's it. Any follow-ups there, Viktor?

V
Viktor Högberg
analyst

Yes, more on the finance side and the capitalization. That took quite a large step-up sequentially. Was that tied to specific development projects? Development revenue was higher as well. So is this a new level to expect? Or would it be more temporary then come down from this level in terms of capitalizations?

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Yes. Again, it has to do with what we work on in specific quarters. You cannot look at how much we have in -- how much we capitalize and say, okay, this is how much you invest in development, because we constantly invest also in the projects that we do where we do not capitalize. So I don't think the level of capitalization is not that high. Yes, it was higher in Q3, and it is of course tied to certain projects. This is not something we discussed because -- of course, the nature of them are such, that things that we invest in for the future. And as we grow, yes, the level will probably be a bit higher. But yes, was that answering your question, Viktor? Or...

V
Viktor Högberg
analyst

Yes. It did. And final question for me. In your opening remarks, you said that actually in October, you shipped more simulators than you had planned to out of Tel Aviv. Is that something that's saying something about demand or just the level of commitment in...

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

No. Thank you for asking that, Viktor. It's more a matter of commitment, the whole company pulling together. It's also a little bit of a hedge from our side. Even though we don't see any impact on our ability to produce and ship out of Tel Aviv, we have moved some finished simulators to our warehouses in the U.S. and in Sweden. So that increases marginally than logistics costs. But this is just sort of a precautionary matter, to have more simulators closer to the customers. Because again, we have very few customers in Israel even if we have a lot of our dedicated and talented team in development and also in assembly there. So no comment indicating anything about demand related to that.

V
Viktor Högberg
analyst

Okay. And is this something -- you're hedging this, so to say. Is this something that might drive inventories a bit higher, at least in the short term? Or will it even out with the existing demand?

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

It depends on how much we sell. So hopefully not. But of course, there's always a bit of risk when you more than ship towards a forecast. And again, the Tel Aviv Airport is open. We have team members traveling out for various activities. But with -- and shipping costs are nowhere near what they were during the pandemic. I mean, then, it was horribly expensive to ship simulators to -- from Tel Aviv to United States, for example. We're nowhere near that but we still want to be on the cautious side and hedge a bit. So therefore, we have moved some inventory of finished products to other sites.

Operator

The next question comes from Ulrik Trattner from Carnegie.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

A few questions on my end. I note that obviously China has been a depressed market for quite some time. But you mentioned in the report, the procurement is looking up now in China. Just curious on what you're basing this on and what your visibility is. And any challenges here in the near term from the anticorruption initiative that is ongoing in China and has been impacting quite a lot of medtech companies, and Intuitive are highlighting this as a near-term limiting factor on their end. Just curious to see what your take is.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. Thank you, Ulrik. I base this -- of course, it is a bit anecdotal, but there are several data points and they come from me being there on the ground. I've been to China 2 times this year after they opened up. The last time was about a month ago. I managed to visit 5 cities in 5 days, so it was an intense week. And I spoke to a lot of people. And as we all know, and like you've also correctly pointed out, this has affected many med device companies.

And it's -- after the pandemic, it wasn't full on throttle that many of us expected. It was slow. It was sluggish. And then on top of that, the government have had an anticorruption campaign targeted specifically at the health care sector. And this means that people like to sit on their hands. It doesn't matter if they are complicit or not. It's just are necessary to be subject to that kind of scrutiny or investigation. And I do see signs -- I mean, look, this usually starts and ends in Beijing. And I see very clear anecdotal signs and stories from people that I interact with that it is lightening up.

Now I saw there were some questions also in the chat, what will this have an effect in Q4, et cetera. I don't know. I simply don't know. I just see that there is a big demand for our products in China, and I'm talking Educational Products when I make these remarks. And we see that it will move to brighter times for us sales-wise. When it comes to Industry/OEM, we see a strong demand from local Chinese surgical robotic manufacturers. And that is a bit detached from our sales of simulators that are going to hospitals that have been affected by this sluggish market, partly connected to the anticorruption campaign.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

That's some great insights. And an additional sort of broader-level question on the entire industry. And another huge topic in the industry, the obesity drugs, the GLP-1s and their effect on the industry. And note, a lot of companies are mentioning this, and a lot of are a bit cautious about the prospects on their business on the back of these weight loss drugs. Do you have any newer insights to share on this topic beyond what we have currently heard from the larger OEM players in robotic surgery?

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. Thank you for that question, Ulrik. I think it's a little bit early to say so far, but a few data points. I mean, when it comes to bariatric surgery, like sort of weight loss surgery such as gastric bypass and similar, even being a big revenue driver for many med device companies, it is still a relatively small part of the surgical robotics market. I think Intuitive probably have 3%, 4% of the revenues tied to bariatric surgery.

And the bariatric surgery that are being done on people who are in a position that they dramatically need to reduce their weight. It's still a very small portion of the overall sort of demand when it comes to obesity. So I think it's a little bit too early to say and it's not something that I am losing sleep over at this stage. And you still need well-trained surgeons even if volume for a smaller subsegment such as bariatric surgery would slightly go down due to more effective drug treatments.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

Yes, fully agree on that statement. Quite good to get that insight. On another subject, you mentioned here in Q2 that the average selling price for Educational Products went down a bit in Q2. Just wondering how that trend is currently looking up? And is this something that -- I know that there is -- in general, these are CapEx sales, but there is -- I'm guessing here, an upselling opportunity once the overall macro turns into adding more functionalities on the systems placed. So just wondering where we are at in terms of that cycle.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Yes. Thanks, Ulrik. In Q2, we did comment on the fact that we saw that our simulators were sold with less modules on them, meaning less software. There's always the hardware and some software, but then you can also purchase add-on modules. And you can do that when you purchase the equipment initially or you can do it later on. And that's what we also said in Q2 that even though we saw that the ASP was lower at that time, we know that we also have pure software sales and that is -- so that is usually then later effect that you see that goes up.

And yes, during Q3, we did see both a favorable product mix, but also we had good software sales. I mean, it's maybe a bit too early to say if that is a trend that, I mean, has completely reversed or is it something we will see. Because it can also be tied to certain markets. And as you know, within educational products, if you look at different quarters, we often have sales from different countries in different quarters. It's not linear in that way that you sell to all countries in all quarters, so that can also have an effect. But we saw a good -- I mean, good strong software sales in Q3 on the educational products on the simulators.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

Great. So at least, there is no additional decline in average sales price. Is that a fair assumption to make?

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Again, it has also to do with product mix, and that can vary between the quarters. Because our products within Educational Products do have different gross margins. But in Q3, we had a good strong software sales and good ASP.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

Okay. Great. And onto some number crunching and a follow-up on Viktor's question on capitalized R&D. Because it's -- as I mentioned, it's not much in terms of absolute numbers but it makes up 24% of EBIT, which is a lot more than it has been historically. Is this sort of level of capitalized R&D in percentage of R&D that we should expect? I know it's lumpy and as well as when you do your modulation for your financial targets to 2026, what type of assumptions do you make in terms of capitalized R&D, in terms of percentage of EBIT or in terms of percentage of sales?

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

That's not what will make us reach the 40% goals. So I mean, it's not that we are sort of playing with that effect. And as you say, it can be lumpy. It was SEK 5.5 million more this quarter than last quarter. And it can be both because we work on certain projects, and again, it's projects that we don't talk about because the nature of them is, of course, that it's something for the future. But it can also be external costs in that. So it's not just that our team is working on it. It can also be certain external -- and it has to do with both, of course, software and hardware parts.

As we grow, again, the number will probably be may be a bit higher but a bit lumpy between the quarters. Also looking back, I think it was Q1 of last year when we had a bump. But that was also due to the fact that when we acquired Simbionix, the accounting -- ways of accounting for that was different in that company. So that also had an effect.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

Sure. But if we look 12 months ahead and look at the average percentage of R&D and percentage of EBIT, we should assume that even though it's lumpy, it should not be on the level that we saw here in the third quarter.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

It will probably, I mean, move a bit higher than in Q1 and Q2.

U
Ulrik Trattner
analyst

Okay. Great. And last question on my end. You now sit on a ton of cash. It's slightly above SEK 600 million. And just how -- what's your plan on deploying this? And what's your view on the current sort of M&A prospects? I know that CAE, they carved out their health care division and sold that quite recently. I'm guessing you had a look at that transaction. So just curious on your view on your prospect of doing M&A and which areas you would like to strengthen your position or if you feel that you are sufficient the way that you are right now and just building up a big cash position.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Look, when it comes to the cash position, Ulrik, we want to turn it into a return for our shareholders. We keep on growing as a company and we keep on investing in the simulation of the future. And we have an M&A agenda that is intact from our strategy work that we did several years ago. But we are not sort of a serial acquirer that go out, sort of opportunistically looking for targets. We know what fits into our puzzle and what fits into the company that we are building. And it's a matter of having the right timing and also working with the potential additions to our company in a way that they can be fully incorporated and all the key employees can stay.

If you look at the acquisitions we've done, all the key employees are still with us. And that is very important for us. CAE Healthcare specifically had actually a rather small overlap primarily in ultrasound simulation with our business. The vast, vast majority comes from patient simulators which, once upon a time, was a company called METI that was acquired by CAE. And then health care simulation actually has pretty little in common with flight simulation, which is the vast, vast 95% plus of CAE's operations. So those are actually my only comment.

And then, of course, an alternative is also to return cash to our shareholders. But that's a question for our Board to make a recommendation and for the shareholders at an AGM to decide upon. We run the company and we see plenty of opportunities to create return on equity basically for our shareholders.

Operator

The next question comes from Christian Lee from Pareto Securities.

C
Christian Lee
analyst

Yes. I have 3. My first is a follow-up question from Ulrik regarding your cash position. If a buyback program could be relevant for you given that the valuation of the stock is down considerably.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Thanks, Christian. Buyback of shares is not possible on First North Growth Market. So as long as we are on that list, that is not an option.

C
Christian Lee
analyst

Okay. My second question is regarding the share of the simulators that are manufactured or assembled in Tel Aviv.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. We have 3 production sites or assembly sites at Surgical Science: it's Tel Aviv, it's Gothenburg and it's Seattle. Typically, the legacy products that came from those 3 different sites continuing being produced at those 3 different sites. So that means we have our largest assembly operation in Tel Aviv. But again we are, as a company, firm believers in doing full functional integration in order to realize the strategic advantages of putting companies together under the same roof.

So the production team and the assembly team are also working together on sharing knowledge, transferring best practices and also being able to produce and assemble simulators that was once developed at one site, at other sites. And this is a great team. It requires skills and hard work and so on, but it's still -- it's assembly. So it's not sort of extremely advanced production of parts or anything like that. That, we have subsuppliers for it. So that's all I can say regarding that question. We haven't disclosed exact percentages and so on. But Tel Aviv is definitely a major assembly site because this is where a lot of the legacy Simbionix simulators are coming from.

C
Christian Lee
analyst

Okay. Excellent. And given that the time line for Ottava regarding the clinical trials in the U.S. is pushed back to late 2024, are you still confident about reaching your financial sales target for 2026?

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes, we are, Christian. And J&J is a great customer. We've been working with them for several years. But in terms of reaching our 2026 financial goals, we need to keep on growing Educational Products between 10% to 15% on average per year. So far, we've been ahead of the curve. And even if Q3 now had a decrease in Educational Products, we are still at an accumulated level of 12% growth in 2023.

When it comes then to surgical robotics, the most important thing for us is that the industry overall grows approximately like we have anticipated. And there, we see great signs. Hospitals are acquiring more surgical robots. Surgeons love it. This is the way of the future. This is the way how they want to work and patient benefits from the better outcomes. So we are -- do not feel dependent on an individual player like J&J launching at a specific time. And I think what they said was pretty much in line with known information. They will do an IDF submission and do in-human trials in the second half of 2024.

Operator

There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions and closing comments.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

All right. I think we have some questions in the chat, right, Anna?

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Yes, we have questions in the chat. I think, I hope we answered most of them. But I will pick 1 or 2 that I think we did not address specifically. One question is that we gave a short comment that the strong Q1 this year was, to some extent, boosted from some sales being pushed forward from Q4 2022. We had a backlog going that we then used a part of in Q1. The question is, does that indicate that Q4 in 2022 could have been even better. And easier comps ahead of this year?

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. Theoretically, if we would have delivered all the orders we got in Q4 2022, the sales would have been higher. But to say easier comps, that I would say no to. Because we always have a backlog in and out of each quarter. And if we compare today with a year ago, the macroeconomics are a lot tougher today. This is also what I said there in the CEO commentary, in that the uncertainty is higher at the moment.

And moving into this end of the year where customers are typically spending their budget, if they have budget, which gives us then a Q4 effect, Q4 in Educational Products, specifically is usually higher than the other quarters. But this year, it's tough. The hospitals are having a tough time. So it increases the uncertainty. So I would sort of say no to easier comps. But you're correct just sort of fact-wise, that if we would have delivered everything in Q4 in 2022, the sales would have been higher. Thank you.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Thanks. Then there is also a question that I can answer, if we can give an indication on how much of sales is recurring.

What we have said is that within our license revenues are partly made up of revenues that are more perpetual tied to a specific robot and the simulation packet on that robot. So it's perpetual for that -- for the life length of that robot. I mean, that's not forever, of course. Then we also have a part that is recurring, tied then to installed base or usage. Also, of course, you might argue that service revenues to a certain extent are of a recurring nature. But no, we have not disclosed how that is divided. And so that is not something that we comment on more than that.

I think the last question here is what the renewal rate on licenses is. And I guess, that ties then to the comment we made on subscriptions, that a different number of subscriptions are up for renewal in the different quarters.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. If that question who came from here in the chat is tied to surgical robotics, we are actually -- I mean, we know it, of course, and we track it very closely. But this is customer confidential information and we are not in a position to make comments about renewal rates or churn, potential churn or things like that. So unable to answer that question actually.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Yes. And I think that -- I hope that the other questions that we have in the chat were answered with the questions that we got from the ones on the phone. So with that, I think we say thank you.

G
Gisli Hennermark
executive

Yes. I would like to thank everyone, and thank you for your questions. And this was, for us, the first time that we had a quarterly call like this where it's open for everyone. We like to be accessible. We like to be transparent. We like to present data and also present our interpretation of the data. So stay in touch with us and give us feedback. And hopefully, we can do it again next quarter.

So thank you very much for today.

A
Anna Ahlberg
executive

Thank you.

All Transcripts

2023
Back to Top