Storskogen Group AB (publ)
STO:STOR B
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
5.1134
10.795
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches SEK.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Welcome to the Storskogen Q2 presentation for 2023. [Operator Instructions]
Now I will hand the conference over to the CEO, Daniel Kaplan; and CFO, Lena Glader. Please begin your meeting.
Hi, and welcome to Storskogen in our presentation of the second quarter. My name is Daniel Kaplan, CEO and Co-Founder of Storskogen. Together with me today, Lena Glader, CFO.
So let's get into it directly. First, a brief recap of Storskogen. We're an international group of businesses, SEK 37 billion in sales, EBITA of SEK 3.5 billion.
Our mission is to empower our business to realize their full potential. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to identify, acquire and develop market leaders with sustainable business models with an infinite ownership horizon. And what we offer our investors is profitable growth and resilience, resilience to manage risk through diversification. And the reason we have this is that we have Services, Trade and Industry, 3 business areas. Services headed by Peter Ahlgren, making up 32% of our turnover, divided up on 7 verticals.
Trade headed by Christer Hansson with 4 verticals, making us 28% turnover.
And finally, Industry, headed by Fredrik BergegĂĄrd, 3 verticals and 40% of our turnover.
So diving into the second quarter, we -- it's characterized by strong cash flows from operations. We're quite happy that we protected our margins despite a challenging environment. Net sales almost SEK 9.5 billion, which is a 4% increase. The adjusted EBITA SEK 922 million, it's a 5% increase. And the adjusted EBITA margin of 9.7% as compared to 9.7% last year in the second quarter. The organic net sales growth, minus 2% and the organic EBITA growth of minus 5%. So looking at our key events. This quarter, we had a successful issuance of SEK 2 billion in bonds and repurchase of the outstanding '24 bond of SEK 3 billion. So we finally got an average maturity now -- debt maturity profile of 30 months.
So that's satisfactory to us. We're quite happy that we managed to protect our margins in the second quarter. And looking at the first half year, we have actually improved our margin from 9% to 9.7%. So that's also satisfactory.
Cash flow. Strong cash flows, is [ about ] SEK 850 million approximately, a significant improvement compared to last year. And this is partly due to the fact that we have had a strong cash conversion at 105% in the second quarter.
We did 4 acquisitions. Out of which, 1 AC Electrical was the platform acquisitions. The other smaller add-on acquisitions. And we also contributed for divestments including, Dextry Group, we go into that later on.
So moving ahead, looking at strategic priorities and how we're delivering on those. Almost a year ago, we had a Capital Markets Day, and we basically stated 6 short-term strategic priorities: the first one, most important potentially is to improve cash flows and refocus on cash flows. And we have to say that we're quite happy now that with 3 consecutive strong cash flow quarters, we're quite happy about that development. We still have some way to go. We have lot of work and potential left. So even though we're not guiding any results or things like that for the second half of the year, we do believe that we continue to have strong cash flows in the second half of the year.
Protect profitability. Well, 2022 was characterized by strong margin pressures, basically with currency movements and all kinds of headwinds, and I think these have continued this year, but in a new form, primarily through weakening demand. But that said, we still have improved our margins. So we're also quite happy with that development, even though, of course, we -- and of course, over a business, we're guiding towards 10% in a weak business cycle. In theory, we would be happy with 9.7%, but of course, we wouldn't put this in green until we are at 10% or higher. So working towards the goal, but making headways, I would say.
Leverage. Well, we peaked at 2.7 interest-bearing net debt-to-EBITDA. We still have some work to do. The ambition remains that by the end of the year, we will reduce our leverage to the lower end of our 2 to 3 spectrum. And the way to do that, of course, is the strong cash flow to protect the profitability, but also the reduced M&A pace.
We are doing strategic add-ons and very few select acquisitions, but very few. We are complementing that with some strategic divestments, divesting low performers and companies not aligned with our ESG or strategic agenda, including margins, for example.
And finally, we have just central costs as well from 1.1% of sales to 0.7% of sales. And in fact, that's a 36% cost reduction as a percentage of sales. So it's actually a significant reduction in our central costs compared to our sales.
So long story short, we believe that we are making great progress on our strategic priorities, and with a strong ambition that this will result in reduced leverage by the end of the year. But most importantly, moving to the next page is, of course, that we create value for our companies and in the end, producing profits and resilience into our portfolio.
The case study today, we've chosen is the Wibe Group. This is a company we bought in 2021 in Q2. This was a carve-out from Schneider Electric. It's a leading company with regard to cable ladders, cable trays and mesh trays. They have some global really strong brands and operations in 6 countries, 280 employees. So it's a significant company seen from the eyes of Storskogen.
The reason why we bought it at the right price is, of course, that this was a carve-out, and carve-out have risks and complexities that makes it unsuitable for all types of buyers, but we do feel confident in our operational capability to help a company becomes, so to say, an independent entity.
So what we have done since the acquisitions is that we have created an operational platform to work together with Patrick and the management, an independent organization, a separate sales organization, an independent systems architecture supporting the business and the entire infrastructure, from procurement to sales as an independent company.
Of course, they have been excluded from the Schneider Electric purchasing agreements, et cetera. But on the other hand, Storskogen by now has more than 60 frame agreements, supplying and assisting Wibe to achieve strong margins even going forward.
And in addition to that acquisition, we've invested in the business, we have done add-on acquisition, creating a further strengthened product portfolio. And the result of this, in the case of Wibe has been a significant rise in sales, 27% uptick in sales, but also stronger margins. So we're very happy with the performance of the Wibe currently with a turnover of around SEK 1 billion in the last 12 months. So this showcases our operational capabilities when it comes to how to create value, but also to create deals that might not be suitable for all types of buyers. So looking forward to continue to support Wibe moving forward.
Back to the quarter and our performance, net sales and EBITA margin. We're quite happy actually that we've managed to protect our margin in the quarter through the diversified portfolio. This has been strengthened by the strong performance of Services. But Trade is, of course, suffering from the recession, especially in Sweden and the weak Swedish krona, especially towards the dollar that affects the margins in Trade adversely, and continued focus on margins in this challenging environment.
Looking at market development in general, Well, we do see a solid demand in Industry and Services. We can see that the cost inflation that we could see accelerate during last year has stabilized. And many of the supply chain disruptions have also gradually been reduced, which makes life easier for us and our companies with margin consequences -- positive margin consequences, of course.
That said, we have a weak consumer demand in all industries related to consumer and durable goods, and also companies early in the construction cycle. They're suffering from weaker demand.
Looking at the transaction market. It's a decent deal to actually from Storskogen's perspective, a very strong deal from many markets and many different industries. Multiples have stabilized. And I think good companies always remains the same with regard to prices. And from our perspective, we're -- there are not that many bargains just because that there's a low turn on the other hand, when we have done a few exits now we have achieved decent multiples on those as well.
Of course, transaction process has taken a little bit longer. And this is because it's a more complex environment. But to us, that suits us quite well because we're currently focusing on delevering. So we're doing less acquisitions, being very selective on what cases we are choosing at the moment, prioritizing small add-ons that support our current market positions and a few, very few platform acquisitions.
So looking at how we are performing against our financial targets. Well, one, and these targets, of course, are set in the medium term, seen over business cycle, assuming access to capital. Looking at the organic EBITA growth, we're guiding towards real GDP plus 1 to 2 percentage points. We're currently at minus 5% year-to-date, not particularly surprising, but of course, not something that we're happy with, even though we believe over a business cycle that we are on target.
Looking at the adjusted EBITA growth, including acquisitions, we hope to guide in line with historical levels. However, without bringing new capital, we have a 25% growth year-to-date. I think that's satisfactory. I think we will see slower growth going forward as we have reduced our M&A pace. Looking at the adjusted EBITA margin over time, 10%, I think, in this case, I think we are on target, 9.7% so far this year in a recession environment. I think that's decent. But of course, like I mentioned before, we're not satisfied until we've beaten that 10% target.
Cash conversion. Our strategic priority for the year, we're really over-delivering here, 87% is last 12 months and hope to continue on that journey to deliver strong cash flows, helping us with our final goal to reduce leverage. We are in the middle of our span, 2 to 3 in net debt -- interest-bearing net debt-to-EBITDA, but that said, we want to be in the lower range, and we will not stop until we're there basically.
So looking at our 3 business areas. We have Services. We made a very strong quarter, significant margin improvement, and a decent organic EBITA growth of 8% or a strong EBITA growth actually this year. Some of the verticals that had a tough time last year. Installation and Infrastructure and actually really improving, both margins and sales. And even some of our other verticals like Digital Services, Logistics, et cetera, continue to deliver. Whereas companies with exposure to new construction, especially Engineering Services, they have a weakened demand.
We know for a fact that Q3 is a weaker quarter for Services due to holidays, et cetera, but we do see a solid demand in most areas and have more visibility in this -- for the second half of the year in a positive manner when it comes to Services. So that's on that on the Services side.
Looking at Trade. Well, Trade is certainly having a tough time. They have an organic sales growth of minus 3% year-to-date but an organic EBITA growth of minus 22%. And this is, of course, due to soft demand with consumer-related durable goods, e-commerce. It's not always consistent. A few of our companies do perform strongly. And from the vertical perspective, Health and Beauty remains strong. But we believe that these tough times will continue in the second half of the year. There's certainly a [indiscernible] significant headwind with the weak Swedish krona towards the dollar. But I think what we have done quite excellently is to retain their market positions, even strengthen the market positions. They're doing a lot of hard work, including cost-cutting programs to protect profitability. And they've been really good at releasing working capital, getting their inventory down. So I think Trade has been the great contributor in the second quarter to our strong cash flows. So we're happy about that.
Looking at the Industry, they had an extraordinary Q1, still a strong but more normalized second quarter. We see a somewhat softer demand side in the autumn, but still from high levels and still a stable development for the Industry. We had a sales growth of 9% in Q2 and the margin expansion. So I think that's a positive thing, of course.
Industrial Technology is performing really well. We saw increased competition in Automation and price pressure. But nevertheless, you have these underlying trends, reshoring, green transition and a great demand for automation solutions. So they're all underlying the strong performance of the Industry. So moving into Q3, we see the trends of the second quarter to continue.
Looking at our transactions, like we said previously, a reduced M&A pace, mainly doing some small add-on acquisitions. One platform acquisition, AC Electrical. Looking at the divestments, we have done a few, Dextry Group being the biggest. And these are, of course, could be low performers or they could be companies not aligned with our overall strategy. And of course, if you look at closely at these divestments that we've done, they have a turnover of about SEK 1.2 billion, and they contributed with SEK 41 million in EBITA. So from a margin perspective, that's below, well, it's closer to 3% or 3.5%. So that kind of shows a little bit why -- the thinking behind why we've done those divestitures. So Lena, financial performance.
Well, thank you, Daniel. Over to the numbers here. So let's have a closer look at the Q2 numbers. First, repeating what Daniel just said, Q2 net sales grew by 4% to SEK 9.5 billion. This growth is driven by acquisitions. As you understand, since the organic sales growth was slightly negative during the quarter, and I'll come back to that in a little while.
For the last 12-month period, net sales were SEK 36.9 billion and pro forma, which is now adjusted for acquired and divested companies. So divested companies are removed for the entire 12-month period here, whereas acquired companies are included for the entire 12-month period. So that leaves us with SEK 36.1 billion in pro forma turnover.
Adjusted EBITA grew by 5% year-on-year to SEK 922 million with the last 12-month period delivering SEK 3.5 billion in EBITA and pro forma against SEK 3.6 million. This corresponds to a margin of 9.7% for the quarter, same level as Q2 last year. And for the first 6-month period, however, EBITA margin, in fact, improved substantially from 9.0% to 9.7% year-on-year. This reflects in numbers, obviously, the operational efficiency improvements that you just mentioned, Daniel. Price increases that have been successful as well as good performance all in Industry and Services.
And besides the softer demand in Trade, as just mentioned, the weak Swedish krona, obviously also continued to put pressure on margin for the business area of Trade. Compared to Q2 last year, in fact, the net effect of this weak Swedish krona against the dollar, pressed the Trade margin by as much as 1 percentage rate impact.
The group operations, HQ costs, as we call them, were maintained at the same level as Q2 -- as Q1, but significantly lower as compared to last year at SEK 68 million compared to SEK 97 million a year ago, representing 0.7% of sales, which is, I think, unchanged for the past few quarters.
EBITA adjustments amount to a total of SEK 101 million for the quarter, where approximately half is a revaluation of earn-out and half is net capital loss on divestments. We have recorded both capital gains and capital losses on these divestments. The net is negative SEK 46 million.
Net financial items were pretty high in Q2, SEK 357 million versus only minus SEK 26 million in Q2 last year. So it's a big delta here, which, of course, impacts the net result and especially the net result development versus last year by quite a bit. However, the actual interest costs are unchanged from Q1 at 200 -- roughly SEK 220 million. This is equivalent to an interest rate of 6.2% on the average interest-bearing debt during the quarter.
Other items in the net financials are nonrecurring costs related to this early redemption of the '24 bonds that you just mentioned as well, Daniel. And then we have revaluations and FX that for the parts that are unhedged in internal loans, that are a negative SEK 84 million in this quarter. So the aforementioned net adjustments and nonrecurring financial items affect net results by all in all, a negative SEK 236 million or SEK 0.14 per share which, of course, impacts the reported EPS, which was SEK 0.04 for the quarter; SEK 0.18 if we had adjusted for added back these nonrecurring items.
And this, of course, also impacted the return on equity, which was 7.7% compared to 9.2% in Q2 last year. And however, return on capital employed increased from 9.6% to 10.2%. Return on capital employed net of cash was in fact, 11.8% and net of goodwill 24.2%. So this is a good improvement from 18.5% a year ago, which reflects a healthy return on capital employed in the subsidiaries, of course.
We have cash flow from operating activities as on the cash flow statement, of SEK 852 million in Q2, which is an improvement of the all in all SEK 517 million from last year -- from Q2 last year with SEK 2.8 billion in cash flow from operating activities during the last 12-month period. Cash conversion was 105% in Q2, a significant improvement from last year as well, and 87% for the last 12-month period. So I'll come back to both cash conversion and leverage separately in a little while.
Let's spend some time on looking at the organic sales growth in the meanwhile. So on this slide, we show organic sales growth per quarter.
In the isolated Q2, this was minus 6%. As you can see on this graph, sales growth has been strong the past years, driven by volume and price, but in the negative territory, as I just said, in Q2. We have, all in all, been successful in increasing prices also in the second quarter, but volume growth in -- particularly in Trade, notably the Home and Living vertical has impacted group organic growth negatively.
On the next page, we're going back to the cash flow here. We're showing operating cash flow now here defined as the EBITA less change in net working capital less CapEx, and cash conversion, which is the same divided by over EBITA. So essentially, how much cash is generated out of the operating activities.
On this graph, we show the last 12-month period, a rolling 12-month in the bars here.
Operating cash flow, LTM, as I said in Q2 was SEK 3.9 billion. And cash flow has, as you can see, improved significantly quarter by quarter over the past 4 quarters on the back of substantial work with reducing working capital, especially.
In Q2, cash flow was positively affected by reduced inventories and higher payables and -- but overall, receivables were fairly neutral here.
Cash flow improvements from Q2 last year are significant, showing through in cash conversion, which was 105% in isolated quarter compared to 44% a year ago. So now we are significantly -- or a bit above the 70% target again, which is as we planned. So CapEx to sales, 1.8% in Q2, pretty much in line with previous periods.
And then over to net debt and leverage on the following -- on the next slide. Showing here is the interest-bearing net debt and interest-bearing net debt-to-EBITDA and the leverage. Interest-bearing net debt was SEK 11.9 billion at the end of the second quarter, which is down from SEK 12.1 billion the end of Q1. And in fact, so that's a decrease of SEK 230 million during the quarter. In fact, with an unchanged or stable SEK-euro rate, the decrease would have been SEK 100 million more.
But leverage was 2.6 or actually just below 2.6 at the end of the quarter, which is the same as last quarter where it was a tad above 2.6, in fact, which is within our target range. But as I think, Daniel, made it pretty clear here just now, we have an ambition to reduce this further by the year-end.
The denominator here, the RPM EBITA, so that's a pro forma EBITA in Q2 was SEK 4.6 billion versus SEK 4.7 million in Q1. So this, of course, affects leverage as well.
Liquidity-wise, our total available liquidity amounts to SEK 8.9 billion, SEK 2 billion in cash and SEK 7 million in unutilized credit facilities.
Regarding the overall financing strategy, we've continued to work towards extending the overall maturity profile to arrive at a more diversified debt portfolio and to reduce the absolute debt. This is particularly relevant, of course, with the current interest rate environment. And as part of this focus, we extended our bank loans by 1 year in Q1 and in Q2. We continued the work by refinancing the '24 -- the bond maturing in '24, reducing its size by SEK 1 billion and roll into of the SEK 3 billion over to a new bond maturing in 2027. This means that we now have no debt maturities in 2023 or 2024.
And in fact, when looking at the gross interest-bearing debt, we, in fact, reduced the gross interest-bearing debt by SEK 1 billion since year-end. So we are working towards lowering the gross debt, so not only focusing on the net debt. And during the quarter, we reduced our gross debt by SEK 0.5 billion.
And then finally, looking at this -- showing this diversification effect in a nice illustration here. We have a diversified business portfolio, obviously, of businesses that we operate in the 3 business areas.
And on this page, we illustrate the diversification by showing the EBITA margin of our business areas over the past 8 quarters. The dotted line there that you see is the group -- the Storskogen Group EBITA margin. And you can see here that our business actually net of the HQ, headquarters. So this is the business areas only.
And you see there, obviously, that EBITA margin from our businesses, the dotted line here is much more stable on a group level, which is obviously the diversification effect when the business areas are combined. And in Q2, you see that Trade and Services are moving up, in fact, sequentially, whereas Industry is in a strong margin level, but slightly lower in Q2 than in Q1 here. And this is the expected -- pretty much the expected seasonal pattern for us in the quarter.
So I think that's it from me. So we'll hand the word over back to you, Daniel.
Thanks, Lena. So in conclusion, some key takeaways. I think we're continuing to deliver on our strategic priorities. Our strong cash flow in the quarter retained margin -- seen over the last 6 months, a significant margin increase, actually. Seasonally strong performance in Services, showcasing our diversification in the portfolio. Looking at our maturity profile, it's been extended first by extending our loans in the first quarter and now refinancing the 2024 bonds, with the smaller [ credit ] issue due in 2027, so a successful refinancing as well.
Looking forward, we're still continuing our operational focus, protecting our margins, focusing on cash flow. And of course, we want to continue our work with our balance sheet, reducing leverage going forward.
So thank you very much for listening in, and now it's time for questions.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Carl Ragnerstam from Nordea.
It's Carl here from Nordea. A couple of questions. Firstly, looking at the negative organic growth in the quarter. Is it by any chance possible to give some flavor on the organic development month by month? I guess we've heard quite a few companies reporting a weak start to the quarter. Do you -- have you experienced the same or is it fairly flattish throughout the quarter?
I know it was certainly -- so I mean you're absolutely right. I think in this, the culprit, so to say, was April, which was a weak month at the start of the quarter, whereas we could actually see a much better May and June, which was actually quite strong, so that...
Strong in the sense that you had positive organic growth in June? Or is it still slightly negative, would you say?
I don't want to comment really on that level, but -- I'm not sure how to respond to that.
I don't -- we're not giving any monthly organic growth numbers.
I think April had fewer work days and there were all kinds of aspects there that made it less profitable month, simply to put.
Okay. Very good. could you perhaps shed some light on the order intake situation in Services and Industry, where I guess, orders make more sense, I guess? And then also if you could give maybe some comments on the length or size of the backlogs you have currently in both of these segments.
I'll try to respond to those that I can. Looking at Services, we do see a relatively steady inflow order intake. Like I mentioned, the visibility for the second half of the year is much better now in a positive base. So we do feel confident in Services.
Looking at Industry, we do have a decent order intake, but we do -- but this is from very high levels. So as compared to previous levels, it's still a softening of that with a slight decrease. And of course, transparency in the Industry is a lot less. So we don't want to be -- we're not as bullish in the Industry as we are in Services. So somewhat weaker order intake in the Industry, but still at decent levels.
And in the Services, I mean, I guess, especially in the construction-related part of it, we've heard that the pricing landscape could be defined as quite fierce, I guess. And we obviously take risk of taking on less profitable projects, which you could suffer for quite some time as lead times are a bit longer. Could you give any sort of flavor on how you monitor project calculations, maybe change your incentive structure in that segment or maybe tightening the thresholds on what projects you could take on as a -- yes, various levels.
I mean you're certainly correct that if in those companies that you would see a decline in order intake that you would -- some managers could get nervous and start to take on projects that are not really that profitable. In most of our companies, we haven't seen that situation. In fact, we are retaining the margins or even increasing margins in Services. And I think we actually see that demand is quite good in most of our companies as illustrated by the second quarter in Services with an improved margin. And I think that trend actually continues in the third quarter with the exception of a few companies, of course. As a rule, most of our companies keep a close watch on costs. And to the extent that those are movable costs, so to say, they would refrain from taking unprofitable projects. So it's not really something that we see yet. But there's -- but we're monitoring closely. And of course, in every Board meeting, we're looking at utilization rate and the upcoming projects. If they're significant, having a discussion with management. But they, of course, need to run their business as good as they can.
Okay. Very good. And the final one from my side is on working capital. We saw LTM level of 16.5%, it looks like at least. Are you still confident you're reaching 15% by year-end? And is it fair to assume that Industry and Services would be the main driver of the release, if you are still convinced that you'll reach the 15%.
I wouldn't want to say that we will reach the 15%, but we are certainly aiming for it. We do see that we will have strong cash flows. I just don't want to commit to exact levels. And I think, we have good progress in Services. We have very strong progress in Trade. Industry has had a quite a strong situation in the first half of the year. So they have had more difficulties obtaining their -- reaching their working capital targets. But well, I know that they're working hard to achieve them, you might say. So a bit of a fuzzy answer there, but we do know that we will have strong cash flows, but I wouldn't want to commit to the 15%. That's more of an internal target for us.
The next question comes from Johan Dahl from Danske Bank.
Just a few questions from my side. Firstly, on, on the balance sheet, I think you've been fairly clear on your ambition to reach the lower end of this indebtedness interval. It just seems as if when we look at the cash flow -- operating cash flow clearly improves, but the metrics, net debt-to-EBITDA doesn't really budge, net debt in absolute numbers does really budge. I was just thinking, looking in the second half year, what sort of measures are you taking to actually take down debt? Is it a stop for acquisition? Is it further divestments because the denominator in that measure seems to be going down slightly if we look on the EBITA on a rolling 12-month basis? Just to understand what measures you're taking to actually get that net debt down in absolute numbers.
Should I start? And then Daniel can fill in regarding the technical aspects of that.
First of all, the net debt was reduced during the quarter and has been reduced during the first half of the year. In the second quarter, just as a reminder, we did pay dividends to our shareholders, and part of that to minority shareholders as well. We did have some earn-out payments as well in Q2, but those will obviously also have in Q3. And then there was some acquisitions, but also some divestments in the second quarter. But overall, as I said, I mean, that was reduced during the quarter. And going forward, I mean the operating cash flow is strong, as I said, and the M&A pace is significantly slower than previously -- there is still a lot to do in terms of reducing working capital and releasing cash flow from operations.
And as you just mentioned, Daniel, especially within business area, all business areas, Trade is continuing to work well. Services is tying up less than the other business areas, and we do expect to see positive results from the Industry as well for the second half of the year. So we are pretty confident and our ambition is clear to reduce the net debt-to-EBITDA towards the lower end during the second half of the year by year-end without going into specifics on that specific plans. But it has mainly to do with operating cash flow as we've seen before.
Have you changed scope in a way in terms of looking at the potential divestments? You talked about the share of sales that are not really performing as you have planned. But has there been any -- can you give us any update there or any changes?
No. I think we don't have a changed scope as such. We're still looking at low performers, and we're also looking at the companies not in line with our long-term strategic agenda, apart from ESG issues that could entail that they have margins, that we that would make -- I mean, Dextry is an example where we -- it's a roll-up case if we would continue to buy painters at a 4% margin, that would be detrimental to our overall margin target. So that's not something we would want to do. So in the Dextry case, it was quite clear that we were not the best owner going forward if that roll-up case was going to be continued.
So we're looking -- when we're reviewing our portfolio, those are the things, that we're looking for, will they fulfill our targets for organic growth for resilient, cyclicality, margins, et cetera? So those are our main focuses. So we -- when we're looking at divestitures going forward, not only this year, but I think continuously in the long term. We gradually look at our -- we can always look at our portfolios also, but there is no change in scope from such perspective. But we do feel like, as Lena said, very confident in our ability to generate strong cash flow. So it's more a question of when that will take more effect in our leverage ratio.
Secondly, on the Industry business area. It just seems as if organic earnings in the second quarter was down some 25%. Can you walk us through what contributed to that? What potentially sort of you take away from that going into the second half year?
Without commenting on the organic growth number, I mean the Industry actually had a decent second quarter, so...
No, the 25% is not the number we have for Industry -- not that weak organic EBITA growth.
Yes. So we actually had a decent second quarter. I mean comparable were really tough because they had a very strong second quarter last year. But all in all, they're actually performing quite nicely in most of the companies. There is some weakness in some of the consumer-facing or construction-facing companies. But overall, we do see a decent performance by Industry. So I guess that would be the negative organic EBITA growth in the second quarter even though it's [ now ] 25%. It's more related to comparables rather than their actual performance from -- and our expectations on their performance.
I just look at the first quarter, you had about 25% organic EBITA growth in Q1 and then it was 0 for the first 6 months. So just so I looked at it. But you also talked about strong order books, et cetera. But if you're happy with the performance, I hear you there.
The next question comes from Karl-Johan Bonnevier from DNB Markets.
Lena, just a couple of more questions on the financials, please, if I may. You alluded to that net interest in Q2 was on a similar level as in Q1. Do you see that with the kind of duration you have on the portfolio and the refinancings you have done being a good guidance also for the second half of this year given the current environment?
Well, if we're talking about rates, I mean, you can calculate that backwards with the SEK 221 million in net interest cost of the average interest-bearing debt, including [indiscernible], you would arrive at 6.2% in Q2. Now this was not including, obviously, the new bond, which is a bit more costly. And also, I believe that we have had some price -- some rate hikes during the quarter, which may not have fallen through completely in that. So you would expect to have a higher interest rate as a percentage point in Q3 and Q4. However, as you point out, I mean, we've reduced the debt as well by SEK 1 billion during the first half of the year. So in absolute numbers, the debt is obviously lower now, which offsets the interest rate hike. So I don't know if that gives you an answer. We don't have any guidance specifically for Q3.
No, no, it's good color. Good color. And looking at the move, with the maturity moved from, on the SEK 3 billion bond from '24 to '27, what's your average majority of your financing for the moment?
Yes. Well, that's a good question. It's 30, 3-0 months, at the end of Q2, is average maturity, which is actually more than 40%, closer to 50%, better or extended compared to the end of last year. So there's all this work that we've done with the expansions, and this bond, even though the bond is slightly more pricy, has had a significantly positive effect on the overall debt maturity, which gives us plenty of room to weight out the market and negotiate new refinancing as we need them. But there is no urgent need to do that right now.
And looking at the portfolio, have you done any move between the variable part and the fixed parts of financing?
Unfortunately, there is no significant such moves now during that quarter. So there is some part that is hedged. It is approximately -- I think it's approximately 10% of the loans or the debt, including the bonds that is hedged with, I think it's like 4 years as of now, but the rest is variable. So let's keep our fingers crossed that rate hikes will flatten out eventually.
I agree to that.
[Operator Instructions] There are no more questions at this time. So I hand the conference back to the speakers for any written questions for closing comments.
So thank you all for listening in. I wish you a wonderful day. And if you have any questions going forward, please contact Andreas or myself and Lena, and we'll try to answer it off-line. All right.
Great. Great.
Take care. Bye.
Bye-bye.