Sandvik AB
STO:SAND

Watchlist Manager
Sandvik AB Logo
Sandvik AB
STO:SAND
Watchlist
Price: 198.75 SEK -0.13% Market Closed
Market Cap: 249.3B SEK
Have any thoughts about
Sandvik AB?
Write Note

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2020-Q3

from 0
E
Emelie Alm
Investor Relations Officer

Hello, everyone, and welcome to the presentation of the third quarter results of Sandvik. We will go through the presentation followed by a Q&A session. And my name is Emelie Alm. And with me today, I have our President and CEO, Stefan Widing; and our CFO, Tomas Eliasson. So with that, I would like to hand the call over to you, Stefan.

S
Stefan Widing

Thank you, Emelie. We will stay in this picture for a few seconds. This is our AutoMine concept. It's a fully automated battery-operated electrical loader. We showcased this at a digital event a couple of weeks ago. It is a concept, but it's real, it's live and it's fully working. If you haven't already seen it in operation, I encourage you to go to social media platforms, so You can see a video clip of this operating in our test mine in Tampere. I think this is a fantastic piece of technology that showcase the technology leadership that our SMRT business have in this industry. Before I go into the Q3 results, I also want to comment a little bit on the other announcements that we have made today. First of all, the Board has decided to proceed with the process of preparing SMT for a separate listing on the nasdaq.com Stock Exchange. We believe this is the right thing to do, both for SMT and the rest of the Sandvik Group. We are aiming to do this in a way that we presented to the shareholders for a final decision in 2022, provided that the circumstances are deemed right at the time. Why 2022? Well, the process itself will take about 15 months to complete and then we are late '21, early '22. And given the current market environment as well, we don't feel the need to do this in a hurry. So we rather wait a little bit longer and aim for a 2022 listing. We have also announced that we are preparing -- forming a new business area. We will -- based on our Crushing and Screening division, create a business area called Sandvik Rock Processing Solutions. We see further growth opportunities in this area. They are operating in a separate part of the value chain compared to the other SMRT divisions. And we also believe that we can increase the transparency of both of these businesses and how they are performing. So overall, we believe this is a positive step forward. This -- we aim -- or we will do January 1 in 2021. And for both of these, we will, of course, also talk more about these announcements on our Capital Markets Day on November 3. So please join that one as well if you want to learn more. If we go into the quarter, this has been a quarter characterized of a gradual recovery. But it has also been a mixed picture depending on what end customer segment or geography we are looking at. In SMS, we have seen a gradual recovery, in particular, driven by automotive and general engineering. While aerospace and energy has been characterized by flattish development versus earlier quarter. In SMT, of course, continued headwinds related to oil and gas CapEx, while, for example, industrial heating is having positive development year-over-year. And then finally, on the mining side, we have a robust development in the quarter. Orders are even up versus prior year, driven by good order intake in equipment with some headwind in aftermarket that I will come back to. In the still fairly tough market conditions, we execute strongly and deliver a resilient earnings performance, a margin of 17.3%, down 100 basis points versus last year, entirely driven by currency. This is, of course, supported by strong savings, both permanent and temporary in the quarter of SEK 1.4 billion. And our adjusted rolling 12 months EBIT figure is now at 16.8%, so well above our trough margin target. We also execute well on the cash items, continue to reduce inventory and have good control over AR, leading to SEK 4.9 billion in cash flow in the period, and we are now at a very low net gearing at 0.05. We have announced and concluded one acquisition in the quarter as well and 2 divestments, the Gesac joint venture that we had in China as well as the exploration business in SMRT. If we look a little bit into the future, we expect a gradual recovery to continue. However, as long as we are in a pandemic, we expect market condition to remain uncertain, depending on how things develop in the overall world and the economy. We are focusing on what we can influence and are focusing now on shifting some of our temporary savings into permanent savings to ensure that we are ready for the business activity we expect going into 2021. Looking then a little bit on the market development here. We can see that our main markets, Europe and North America, are down around 20%. Asia, much better at minus 4%, but this is also mixed picture. Rest of Asia is more in line with Europe and North America, while China is plus 8% in the period. So China is bringing up the Asia picture in a quite significant way. The other regions, more mining-driven are flattish or in the case of Australia, up significantly because of some very good orders that we received in the quarter. Looking at the segments year-over-year. Mining, plus 2%, so a sideways development year-over-year, which under these circumstances, we see as very positive. The others are then down year-over-year as expected. If we look a little bit on the -- within quarter trends here, we have seen a continued improved sentiment in mining. The metal prices hold up and continued opening up of mines. In general engineering, we have seen a recovery more towards the end of the quarter, same with automotive. We should say that both of these, we can say that July and August were characterized of more sequential flattish development in the quarter, while the recovery really started to pick up in September. Energy, construction and aerospace, we have not really seen any improvement in the quarter sequentially, like for the rest. If we summarize this, order intake of minus 11%. This would be minus 9%, excluding major orders in SMT and revenues follows as also minus 11%. EBIT development, very strong, SEK 3.5 billion in the quarter and adjusted EBIT margin of 17.3%. This is a leverage of minus 19%, which is very strong for us. Excluding metal prices, even better, 17.5% versus 18.1%. And as I mentioned, the negative margin development is basically entirely driven by currency effect. Why we offset the organic decline through savings initiatives, and this is true for all business areas. If we go into the business areas and start with SMRT, positive order intake at plus 2%, revenue at minus 2%. So in both cases, a good performance. Equipment had another really strong quarter, plus 20%, following a strong performance also in Q2. Aftermarket, down minus 9%. This is because of a couple of different reasons. First of all, we had very strong compares. Sequentially, quarter versus last -- or Q2, we were up plus 6%. So it shows that activities are going up. On top of that, we have some lingering access issues in some mines. So mines have opened up, but they are not allowing visitors if they can avoid it. So noncritical maintenance and repair are being pushed out, while we can see that more consumables, rock tools and so on are doing better. We can also see apples-to-apples at specific mining sites that are open. They are actually increasing aftermarket versus prior year. So underlying sentiment, positive, and we are not really worried about this. It will come back. Then I also want to focus on another innovation that we also launched a couple of weeks ago. We have launched our first battery-operated 18-ton loader. This is the first product coming out of design engineering together between Sandvik and Artisan, the acquisition we did a couple of years ago. And this is a loader that has been designed from ground up to be battery operated. And also this, I think, shows the technology leadership we have in this area. SMRT also delivered strong margins, 21% in the quarter, up from prior year, also supported by good savings activities. We have also announced the divestiture of our Exploration business in October. This is a small part of SMRT, it's about 1% of sales. So it will not have a major impact, but it was a divestment that we felt was the right thing to do because they had not performed to the level that we expect a Sandvik division to perform. Then you have also seen the announcement that we are creating a new business area, Sandvik Rock Processing Solutions, or SRP, effective January 1. A small note here. As part of this, we will also change the name of SMRT to Sandvik Mining and Rock Solutions or SMR, simply to align with the nomenclature of our other business areas. Going to SMS then. Gradual recovery, still minus 19% in order intake and revenues following a little bit behind on minus 21%. This is natural, an upswing that orders are leading revenues. Europe, on the average, so to say, at minus 19%; North America, 25% negative; and Asia, minus 15%. Here, Asia is again being improved by China. China is minus 1% in the quarter. North America versus Europe is also partly driven by higher mix of aerospace in North America versus Europe. Aerospace, no improvement in the quarter. They are still at the minus 50% level. So that is one offsetting factor to the improvements we have seen in automotive. And in automotive, we are, in the quarter, in the low teens negative numbers. And as I said, the main improvement has really come towards the end of the quarter. Daily order rate in September were in the negative mid-teens. So this shows that in July and August, we really have no improvement compared to how we entered the quarter, but then we saw an uptick in September. This has then continued in October. We are better than mid-teens, but still in the negative double-digit range in the first week of October. Despite this, very strong margins, considering minus 21% on the top line, 18.8% from SMS, strong savings initiative. And in this quarter, also, even though they brought down their inventories, they did that last year as well. So it wasn't -- year-over-year, it was a neutral impact on the -- from the production levels. And then we should also note that the new structure we announced in July is now implemented. So as of October 1, we have 2 segments here, Machining Solutions and Manufacturing Solutions, operating 2 different business areas segments. Going then into SMT, minus 34% on order intake, and it would have been minus 20%, excluding a couple of major orders that we got in August of last year. Obviously, still challenging figures. Revenue is a little bit better, minus 13% supported by backlog. Here, continued uncertainty in oil and gas. Also aerospace is obviously soft, but that's a small part of the SMT business. The positive development in the quarter is that industrial heating, or Kanthal, has started to turn around, and they had a positive year-over-year order intake in the quarter. Kanthal is one of our early cycle divisions. They started their decline over a year ago, and it's positive to see them now starting to turn around. Hopefully, that will also lead to positive development in other businesses going forward. Despite this drop in top line, SMT delivered a strong margin for them, 4.9%. It's almost the same level as last year. So very well executed by the team there, good savings impact from them. Then, of course, the big announcement today is that we are proceeding towards preparing them for a separate listing in 2022, if the circumstances are deemed right at the time. With that, I'll come back at the end, of course, but I'll now hand over to Tomas for some more numbers.

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

Thank you, Stefan. So let's jump straight into the financial summary. And start in the upper right-hand corner, looking at the top line. And as it happens this time, our numbers are exactly the same, both for orders and for revenues. So minus 11%, as you've heard; minus 8% on currency, quite a big number now when the krona is strengthening against the U.S. dollar; structure, minus 2%, which is basically the divestment of Varel Oil & Gas. So all in all, minus 20% on the top line. If we then jump into the income statement. Further down, earnings came in at SEK 3.5 billion. A reduction or a decline with 24% or 23%, if you exclude metal prices. Margin came in at 17.3%, and we'll dig into the bridge in just a few seconds. Finance net came in at plus SEK 529 million compared to minus SEK 198 million a year ago, a little bit of an odd number, but I'll spend 0.5 minute to explain to you the details in that one as well in a bit. Tax rate, SEK 23.6 million, well within the guided range. Strong cash flow, SEK 4.9 billion or SEK 10.5 billion for the 9 months. Returns 15.5%. And it's not so much the margin, it's more the capital turnover that goes down now when the top line is decreasing. And earnings per share, adjusted SEK 2.09. So let's move to the bridge. And of course, let's look at the organic part or price volume productivity, minus 11% on the top line, that's SEK 2.8 billion in revenues with an EBIT impact of SEK 500 million, a little bit more than SEK 500 million. That gives us a negative leverage of 19%, so basically in line with the margin that we had. So the dilution on the margin is very close to 0 or minus 0.1%, basically nothing. If you look at the next column, you see the impact from currency, 8%, that's SEK 1.7 billion. And also here, SEK 0.5 billion in earnings. So this gives 100 bps of margin dilution. Metal prices takes off 30 structure, adds 40. So all in all, as Stefan mentioned here, 100% of the margin dilution in the quarter came from currency. Now of course, if you look at the fantastic performance here organically, where does it come from? It comes from the savings program, of course, very much. And if we then jump to the savings program slide here. This is what happened in the third quarter. This is the same picture as we had after the second quarter. We have the 3 programs here, the first 1 being the savings program that we launched in 2019. It was delivered or executed by mid-2020, but as this is a year-over-year bridge, we will continue to have year-over-year tail effects in Q4 as well. And a little bit in Q1 before it's over. The next 2 lines are the temporary savings, work time reduction, SEK 470 million. It was SEK 605 million in the previous quarter. Other temporary savings, mainly discretionary spending, is executing very, very well, delivering very well, SEK 630 million. That's a higher number compared to Q2, but we must also remember that not all of the divisions and the business areas were up and running full speed in these programs on April 1, it came in a little bit later, some of them in May. In the third quarter, we have been running full speed, all 3 months for all our entities. So a higher number. All in all, SEK 1.4 billion in the quarter in savings compared to SEK 1.5 billion in the second quarter of this year. And as we have mentioned several times, these temporary savings will taper off as the business recovers. Much of it will be gone by year-end, but not all it, depends on how we enter 2021. And we have to replace some of these short-term savings with permanent savings. And you see the number in the bottom right-hand corner, SEK 1.3 billion in savings, already announced in programs during the first half of the year. And depending on how the business develops during the second half of this year, there might be more announcements. So we'll see. On the next slide, we have the net financials, the plus SEK 529 million. But the really important number here is on the first line, it's the interest net. That is what's connected to the debt level and to the interest rates. And that came in at SEK 79 million compared to SEK 99 million a year ago. We had some maturities at the start of this year. So of course, the debt level -- the gross debt level goes down. The year-to-date number on interest net is now SEK 300 million, and I'll talk a little bit more about the guidance in a few slides. Then in the middle, you have something called other financial income and costs. And here, we account for the capital gain of the divestment of the 10% stake we had in Gesac in China. And as this is an associated company and not a consolidated company, you account for the capital gain or the capital loss in the finance net, strangely enough, but that's how it is. Next slide, tax rate. We report 20.1%. But also here, the divestment of the 10% stake comes in because this was a Swedish holding. Swedish holding means that it's tax exempt. So if you add back that, the underlying tax rate on our continuing business is 23.6%, well within the guided range, although in the lower half of it. Working capital improved. And you can see also on the right-hand side that the relative numbers came down for SMRT and for SMS, whilst it increased a bit for SMT. But we should mention here that inventories came down in all 3 business areas. And speaking of working capital, of course, in recessions or business cycle downturns, you always get a little bit worried about credit losses or an overdue and all of that. But we can confirm that we have no increase in credit days to our customers. We have actually decrease of overdues, and we don't have any increase in credit losses. So it's working fine. Next slide, the cash flow came in strong. As I mentioned, SEK 4.9 billion. If you look at the table on the right-hand side, of course, if you have less earnings, you have less cash flow. But we continue to release money from working capital, and we are reducing CapEx. If you look at the left-hand side, you can see that when business declines, cash flow is normally higher than the earnings. And you can see it develops exactly like that. When business is up like it was in '17 and '18, earnings is higher than cash flow. So according to expectations. My favorite slide, at least for the time being. The net debt development here, cash flow -- with a strong cash flow. We continue to reduce the net debt. The total net debt is SEK 3.1 billion. But if you get the financial net debt, it's actually a net cash position of SEK 8 billion right now. And the total gearing is 0.05, continues to go down. Then let's look a little bit at the guidance we gave you in the previous quarter. We guided for a underlying currency effects of SEK 250 million. With the weakening of the U.S. dollar strengthening of the krona, we came in at SEK 482 million. Total currency effect, including all types of revaluations, SEK 525 million; metal prices, we guided SEK 50 million, came in at SEK 25 million; CapEx SEK 0.6 billion, accumulated SEK 2 billion right now for the year; interest, as we just talked about, SEK 0.1 billion; and the tax rate, 23.6%. So let's look at the guidance now for the fourth quarter and the full year. And we did one change 2 quarters ago. We changed the CapEx guidance. We said it's not going to be SEK 4 billion anymore, it's going to be SEK 3.5 billion in the light of the recession or the downturn in the business cycle. Of course, now with SEK 2 billion for 9 months, it's not going to be SEK 3.5 billion. It would be something less. But -- well, you have -- just have to wait for the fourth quarter to see the full year number. Currency, we expect to be minus SEK 350 million for the fourth quarter; metal price plus SEK 50 million; interest net, minus SEK 500 million, is the guidance we have. We are of SEK 300 million now for 9 months. So it will be quite a bit below SEK 500 million before the year ends. And the tax rate, 23% to 25%. In 3 months, at the Q4 report, we will come back to you and give a new updated set of guidance for all these items here, also including the tax rate. So with that, I hand back to you, Stefan, for summary and conclusions.

S
Stefan Widing

Thank you, Tomas. So we are happy with the execution that we have had in the third quarter. There is a gradual recovery, although it's a mixed picture across segments. We have continued to show strong earnings resilience throughout this period. We continue to generate good cash flow, and we have a strong balance sheet. Looking ahead, we expect the recovery to continue, although market conditions will remain uncertain as long as we are in the middle of a pandemic. And we are, right now, focused on shifting some of the temporary savings into permanent going into 2021. We are also very happy about the additional announcement that we have done today. We are proceeding towards preparing SMT for a separate listing. And we are creating a new business area, Sandvik Rock Processing Solutions, starting January 1 in 2021. Thank you very much. And with that, I think we'll go to Q&A.

E
Emelie Alm
Investor Relations Officer

Yes. Thank you, Stefan. Thank you, Tomas. It's now time for us to start the Q&A session from the conference call. [Operator Instructions] So operator, please go ahead.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Klas Bergelind of Citi.

K
Klas Henrik Bergelind
Director

It's Klas from Citi. So the first one on SMS. If we back out the drag from aero and oil and gas, which must be down well over 50% in the quarter, then it seems like rest of SMS is maybe down 10%. And that's obviously pretty solid improvement compared to the second quarter. And you say October has started down low double-digit for total SMS. So what is October doing ex-aero, oil and gas? Are we perhaps flat? It sort of looks like it. So I will start there.

S
Stefan Widing

So aerospace, as I said, was down around 50% in Q3. And automotive, as I said, in the low teens. The rest were more like in the mid- to the lower teens as well. So it's not really 10%, if you do the math on that. Then October -- I mean we have given the information we have that in total, we are still in the double digits, but it's better than the mid-teens. And then there is no reason to assume any difference in terms of the segment mix, so to say. We're going to continue to see aerospace being tough, while automotive and the figures that have come out only recently here as well indicates a continued recovery there.

K
Klas Henrik Bergelind
Director

So in my minus 10%, I backed out oil and gas as well. So that must also be down 50%, roughly, right?

S
Stefan Widing

No, not really. Not for SMS. No.

K
Klas Henrik Bergelind
Director

Okay. Cool. My second one is on the cost savings, for you Tomas. So obviously, temporary actions are now run rating SEK 4 billion, you did SEK 1 billion in the quarter. And we have SEK 1.3 billion of structural savings to kick in next year. And that's obviously a pretty big gap to bridge. Of course, work time reduction will not go on forever, but this SEK 630 million in other temporary savings or SEK 2.5 billion run rate, how much of this can translate into more structural savings? I'm thinking changed way of working, less travel, more online sales, more meetings over Teams and Zoom and so on. We as -- came off out the call with Volvo, and they were very clear that they -- holding on to the savings as much as possible. So just curious, Tomas, how much of that other temporary savings can basically translate into perhaps a little bit more structural savings at least in the midterm?

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

That's a little bit difficult to say, of course. But I mean, we don't believe that travel will come up -- come back fully even in the first quarter of next year. So some of these temporary savings will continue into 2021, and there will be some short-term working weeks as well, depending on which business is going into 2021. But of course, we try to learn, and we try to see what we can do more remotely. I mean we still have to see customers, but maybe some of the administrative work can be done in another way. I don't know if you want to comment, Stefan?

S
Stefan Widing

No, I agree. I don't think we don't really have a forecast for that. I would say the same thing. We're going to aim to take this learnings and make the best out of it, but it's very difficult to predict exactly what we can achieve with that.

K
Klas Henrik Bergelind
Director

A very quick final one. Just a clarification on Crushing and Screening being separated as a new business area. Do we include mechanic escalation there? Or is that outside?

S
Stefan Widing

Now mechanical cutting remains in SMR, the other part.

K
Klas Henrik Bergelind
Director

Got it. And just curious on your market share right now in Crushing and Screening, Stefan, if you could help us. I know you're leading in terms of margins, at least on the stationary side. But just curious on the relative position in stationary and mobile. If you could give us some indication, that would be very helpful.

S
Stefan Widing

It is a more fragmented market, which is one of the reasons that we are doing this because we think there are also more opportunities. I don't have, top of my head, a good market share there. So I think we'll have to -- I refer to IR to come back to you on that.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Magnus Kruber of UBS.

M
Magnus Kruber
Associate Director and Research Analyst

Magnus with UBS. I think you mentioned some low teens decline in SMS auto specifically. I mean first, was that organic or nominal? And also, I think if we compare that number to the 5% decline in global production or 10% in Europe, it's a quite big difference. Is there any risk that sort of -- that difference has been driven by EVs as a larger percentage of the total delivery mix?

S
Stefan Widing

It's organic, to begin with that. So it's currency corrected, so to say. So price volume, the number I mentioned. There is a gap versus production. I mean what we see, registrations down 1.5% in Q3. At least I haven't seen the final outcome on production. We have seen forecasts minus 6% up to minus 9%, but with maybe the latest data indicating the better part of that. But even with that, there is a gap. We are not foreseeing that, that has to do with EVs. We believe it's supply chain-driven. Things have turned up towards the end of the quarter. We saw the same thing in March. Factories had shut down and it took 2 weeks for us to see an impact. I'm not surprised that we see a similar lag in the supply chain when things go upwards. So we don't foresee this to be in any way a structural difference. It's a time lag, is our view.

M
Magnus Kruber
Associate Director and Research Analyst

Got it. That's very clear. And then also on the separation of Crushing and Screening. Could you help us put into context what the margin has been for that business in the past as well as for the rest of the SMRT business? And how should we think about normalized margins for the 2, respectively?

S
Stefan Widing

You will get more data on the Capital Markets Day. We will share some of this in a much more clear way. What I can say is that they have done a fantastic improvement in the past 5 years. And it's now a good business. They are still dilutive to SMRT, but not materially. And the return on capital is very good. It's a fairly capital-light business actually compared to some of the others. So we will share more exact figures on the Capital Markets Day. So you will have to wait until then.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Gustaf Schwerin of Handelsbank.

G
Gustaf Schwerin
Research Analyst

Gustaf Schwerin of Handelsbank here. I'd like to start off with the order intake in SMRT. Are you going to report any larger orders there for the equipment side? But strong growth, how much of this would you say is some sort of pent-up demand from Q2? And how much is underlying driven by the improvement we've seen in metal prices?

S
Stefan Widing

I don't think there is any pent-up demand from Q2. We had strong equipment orders also in Q2. Of course, there's always timing aspects to orders of equipment. But with 2 straight quarters with good intake, I cannot say anything else, that -- we have a good momentum and it is -- underlying sentiment is positive, driven by metal prices and CapEx.

G
Gustaf Schwerin
Research Analyst

Great. And then just following up on the comments you made about the new Crushing and Screening division. Do you want to say anything on whether you view this as core for Sandvik going forward? I saw that you gave the 2019 margin for this. I saw that, that was slightly below the trough target. So how do you view this going forward?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes. The fact that we turn it into a business area, I think, says that we do believe that this is part of our core business. And going forward, we'll also share some -- again on the Capital Markets Day, some ambitions we have. This will be accretive to our trough margin target going forward. That's our ambition.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Gael de-Bray of Deutsche Bank.

G
Gael de-Bray

My first question relates to the processing business. Could you perhaps just elaborate a little bit more on the main differences been processing and the rest of mining in terms of business model and in particular, in terms of competitive dynamics? And do I understand correctly that the main rationale behind the separation of that business is actually to put it in a better position to lead the consolidation process of this specific part of the mining industry? The second question relates to SMS. Could you give us some granularity on the respective operational performances of the 2 business areas, Machining Solutions and Manufacturing Solutions in this quarter?

S
Stefan Widing

So regarding Crushing and Screening or the new Rock Processing Solutions business area. Crushing and Screening is what we would characterize as downstreams in the process, while the rest of SMRT is upstreams. So rock and drill, blast and whole or rock excavation. And then we go downstream, we take the extracted rock and we start to process it to extract the valuable minerals. Those 2 parts of the value chain are distinct, even in the -- at the customer side, it will -- we will talk to different people, and the decisions typically are different as well in terms of investments and so on. And if you look at the competitors, I'm not going to name any here, but it's clearly different competitors in these 2 areas. They -- you could also say that they have a bigger part towards comminution and in that sense, construction. So they have a higher mix of construction versus mining as well. So it's a clear and fairly straightforward split in that sense. And I believe with doing this, they will also drive their own core business and the rest of SMR will drive their core business in the rock excavation part of the value chain. It is a more fragmented part, as I said. There are more opportunities in terms of growth in that area. So that's what we're going to aim for. Now when you mentioned, if we want to take a lead in the consolidation of this part? I mean there is, of course, speculation out there. We are not aiming for any big acquisitions in general. That's not part of our M&A strategy. But we prefer bolt-ons and maybe medium-sized, that's our strategy. That doesn't rule out any options. You never know what happens, but it's not part of our core strategy. In terms of the SMS question, we will comment more as well on that split on the Capital Markets Day. So I want to wait with that. We hadn't done the split in Q3 yet. So there is no separation in terms of reporting or performance, so to say, in Q3 between them. They were all part of SMS.

Operator

And our next question comes from the line of Daniela Costa at Goldman Sachs.

D
Daniela C. R. de Carvalho e Costa

I have 2 questions. One which is sort of following through on like the SMT announcement. You obviously looked at the case over the last few months, and you decided to go ahead with it. Can you explain a little bit why you decided to go ahead with it? And whether -- and for example, why SMT and why not sort of SMRT versus SMS, for example, why do those fit together? That's my first question. And now the second question, just more on detail in terms of -- I think Tomas said his favorite slide was the one on net debt. Just wondering on capital allocation, what type of level of balance sheet are you comfortable on a more medium-term view? I think in the past, you have commented about the ideal potential sort of strategic moves around SMS. So interested on what balance sheet do you think is adequate going forward.

S
Stefan Widing

All right. I'll take the first one. SMT, yes, and I -- when I look into this, I see a business that is world leading. It's a world-leading materials technology company. It's high performing versus its peers. Within Sandvik, they are always coming in third. And that's #1. It's -- they're not seen as high performing within Sandvik, which is not a good environment to be in from a people perspective, but also, of course, not from a capital allocation perspective. If we have capital to allocate, I mean, it's our job to allocate it where it gives the best returns. And I believe from that, that SMT on its own will get recognition and be able to perform much better as a stand-alone entity. That's -- those kind of, let's say, reasons are not valid for any other parts of Sandvik. So that's the reason why we are now -- decided to do this for SMT, but have no plans or any agenda to do it anywhere else.

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

Yes. On the net debt, yes, of course, we are piling up money in the balance sheet, of course, and the leverage is not that high. And it's not very efficient, and it impacts the return -- the total return in a negative way. So we need to do something with the money. But we are entering a period here now with an even more intensified growth agenda, both organically, but also through M&A. So the headroom is big. It's good. There's a lot of headroom in the balance sheet now. First of all, we have a strong operational cash flow every year. But we can also use the muscle in the balance sheet. And optimal balance sheet -- I mean we said net -- the gearing mix 0.5. We are in 0.05 right now. So just do the math on that. And so our plan or our base plan, according to our strategy and our ambitions is to use the balance sheet for acquisitions going forward. If we would completely fail within the next 3, 4 years, which we will not, but if we would, then we need to do something else with the money. Of course, we realize that, too. But not now. It's acquisitions.

Operator

And our next question comes from the line of Max Yates at Crédit Suisse.

M
Max Yates
Research Analyst

I just had a quick question on your aftermarket. You talk about having some access issues to certain customers, I presume. Could you give a little bit more detail around sort of where that is? Exactly what's happening there? And whether that was something that was sort of more during the start of the quarter and has eased? Or whether that's something that's been sort of fairly continuous?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes, sure. Now it's in -- I mean it is in specific regions, South America, South Africa, India, for example. It is also in other places, but it depends on the situation of the pandemic development and to some extent, also how the history has been and how sort of careful they have become. In -- what eased up at the end of Q2 was that mines opened up again that were closed. This -- with access issues, it has continued throughout the quarter. And I think we will see some of these -- it will continue as long as we have the pandemic situation because, obviously, everyone is trying to secure their own operations and minimize the risk and take care -- health of safety of people and so on. Of course, it cannot go on forever. At some point, you cannot push out critical maintenance and repair, if you want to continue to operate. But -- so it's difficult to say exactly how long it will continue. But it's not something that we're just in the beginning of the quarter.

M
Max Yates
Research Analyst

Okay. And just my follow-up question, if -- well, you talked about the automated loader, the battery-powered loader. I mean could you give us a feeling of kind of -- if we look at your equipment orders this year, is there any way you can give us some details around the proportion of orders, which were from automated equipment? Perhaps sort of any detail around how much it makes up of your installed base, just to give us a sense of kind of how big these businesses are right now within kind of the equipment orders that you'll take this year?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes. I don't have a quarterly breakdown on the automation part of the order intake. And I'm not sure if that means a lot either. It comes and goes in batches, so to say. But it is a continued trend. We have said always through this that, yes, this will increase the interest in this because, obviously, that's another argument for automation if you can also make your operations more secure from a pandemic point of view. But on the other hand, these things take time. It needs -- you have to plan for them when you plan for the design and so on. So we don't expect a short-term impact on this. But it gives another argument for why this will become interesting mid to long term.

M
Max Yates
Research Analyst

Are you finding you're selling them primarily to mines that are fully automated? Or are you actually selling sort of pieces of equipment just into existing mines that are maybe replacing nonautomated equipment? And therefore, you have sort of interoperable automated and nonautomated fleets in the same mine?

S
Stefan Widing

It's a much more common that they have automated some machines, some trucks, for example, or loaders. Fully automated mines are still relatively rare, I would say, or they are rare.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Andreas Koski at Nordea.

A
Andreas Juhani Koski
Analyst

So I can start with a sort of follow-up on your cost savings because Tomas, you said that the SEK 1.1 billion that you had in temporary savings will probably fade away by the end of the year. Can you give us some sort of sense what we should expect for the fourth quarter in terms of temporary savings?

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

When it comes to work time reductions, mainly work time reductions, we guided for SEK 1.5 billion when we started this. And we still believe SEK 1.5 billion more or less for work time reductions. For the other discretionary spend part, we don't really have a guidance. It depends on the activity level. It depends on traveling, very much on traveling. I don't know if you want to say anything about that or?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes. No, what we can say is that we have businesses now because of recovery that are starting to ramp up marketing and sales activities and so on. Travel is still difficult, but there are other things you can do. So if anything, it will be less in Q4, but that's a positive because it means that the business is coming back. So -- but then the trade-off of that depends really how things develop here in Q4.

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

Yes.

A
Andreas Juhani Koski
Analyst

Okay. Understood. And then I would like to come back to Max's question about the mining aftermarket because I think in Q2, the mining aftermarket was down 14%, but you said that June or at the end of June at least, I don't remember exactly, was flat. And then it seems like it deteriorated again in the third quarter. So maybe if you can talk about the profile in the third quarter? And are we still running down like 10% in September and the beginning of October as well for SMRT's aftermarket business?

S
Stefan Widing

I think what this speaks to, I think, is how careful we should be to draw trend lines in this environment because it was down a lot in Q2 in the first month. What we can say now is that there was probably a bit of a catch-up effect as well in June then. And then we have seen this. It's not really 10%, but let's say high single-digit decline in Q3. Again, it's still sequentially up 6%. So it shows that activities have increased actually. We had very high compares last year in -- as well. So that also needs to be factored in. And also, as I said, the consumers, the rock tools that you need to produce, they were flattish. It's really the wear and tear, so to say, that is down because of these access issues. So that's sort of the dynamic. And as I said, it's not that it was only in the beginning of the quarter. I think we will see this during the pandemic for as long as they can push this out. How long that is, we don't really know. We will see. But I think the important thing -- I just want to say is the underlying sentiment is positive, they are producing. So eventually, they will have to also service or repair.

A
Andreas Juhani Koski
Analyst

I know we only have 2 questions, but I just want to check one thing, so we understand you correctly. When you are saying that your strategy is to do bolt-on acquisitions and no larger deals. Is that true for SMS too? Or are you looking for larger deals in SMS?

S
Stefan Widing

No. But -- so let me clarify what I mean by that. Bolt-ons are at a divisional -- so divisions that do acquisitions and it become -- might become a business unit or they are brought into the division. When I say medium size, it is essentially a new division in the group. Divisions in the group are -- well, there are exceptions, but let's say, over SEK 1 billion, less than SEK 10 billion in revenue. That's what I mean with the midsized. Larger than that, can happen. I'm not ruling it out, but it's not part of our strategy because of the risk level and all of those things.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Olof Larshammar of DNB.

O
Olof Krook Larshammar
Analyst

Olof Larshammar from DNB. 2 questions from my side. Firstly, it will be interesting to hear a little bit more about the background of divesting the Exploration drilling business. And I know that profitability is weak compared to the other parts in SMRT. But isn't this very close to the other products that you're offering? And my second question is relating to SMT and order intake has been a bit below sales during the last quarters. And if you could elaborate a little bit about the order book going forward and especially on umbilicals? And if you have seen a trend of customer putting out order delivery dates for those products?

S
Stefan Widing

Right. Thank you. So Exploration, yes, let me first say that my first reaction, when I came in and saw that -- when the business came and said that they wanted to look at divesting this. This was my first reaction as well. This must be very close to everything else we're doing. Matter of fact, it is not. It is very -- it's specific products, very specific products. And it is also typically not the same people you sell it to. Exploration and the development of production drilling is quite -- or is separated. So we don't see any negative impact in that sense on the rest of the business. That said, I'm not saying I wouldn't regard it as a core business. We have decided to divest this now because, quite frankly, we did not do a good job a number of years ago after the financial crisis in the structuring of that business, and it has suffered ever since. And when we look at it, the time and money it would take us to get that into shape, it was not worth it. While a smaller company, that we have now sold it to, fully focused on exploration and maybe different expectation on returns. It's okay for them. I'm not saying that we would never go back into exploration. We don't see any path to that now, but I'm not saying that this is not something we want to do, but we couldn't do it in a good way here. So I think this was the best way forward. SMT, yes, they have been living on backlog for some -- since Q2, and it is primarily the longer cycle umbilicals and to some extent, aerospace as well, but it's primarily on the umbilical side. They have some backlog left in Q4 as well. Not 100%, but they will also deliver in Q4. We expect a tough 2021. We don't expect it to be empty. We still get smaller orders. And we still expect to get orders also next year. But it will be a low, a very low umbilicals here next year. That's what we are planning for, at least when we rightsize the business.

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Lars Brorson of Barclays.

L
Lars Wauvert Brorson
Director

A couple of quick questions for me, if I can, Stefan. First on SMS in China. I think I heard you say down 1% in Q3. I think it was down 4% in Q2. But we talked about some improvement back in June, July. It looks a bit underwhelming, partly because I think we've seen sort of broader industry data suggest a pick up in that market. Could you help me a little bit with what's going on in your Chinese business? And presumably, the greater reliance on some of the larger global accounts, which is your Coromant business, might be a slight headwind versus your Dormer Pramet business. But I wanted to just maybe understand a bit better at what you see in terms of the underlying dynamics in China?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes. No, it is, as you say, we -- you're right, I said minus 1%. And what we see, it's -- we have a lot or a lot -- a big portion of that business is key accounts or global companies that are also exporting out of China. And that's been tougher, while the domestic market has recovered better. Now a fairly big part of our business in China is also in the premium segment. So we are tilting towards the global accounts in that sense as well. So of course, that has an impact then as well.

L
Lars Wauvert Brorson
Director

And just as you look into the fourth quarter, do you see any evidence of a more broad-based pickup in your Chinese business in SMS?

S
Stefan Widing

I mean in general, because of automotive coming back more, that also helps because that's fairly strong in China. That helps, but that's all we can say right now.

Operator

And our final question comes from the line of Joel Spungin of Berenberg.

J
Joel Adam Spungin
Analyst

Just quickly. I just was wondering if you could just sort of elaborate a little bit on the process of spinning SMT. I don't want to -- wish to seem churlish, but obviously, you're saying it could take another 15 months or so. I mean given the internal separation is complete, I think if you go back a year or before your time, Stefan, we were talking about having this process completed by the end of 2020. You're now talking early 2022. Why is it that it's going to take so long from here, given a lot of the internal work's already been done?

S
Stefan Widing

Yes. I don't -- I cannot comment on what was said in the past. I can say there -- even if we would now -- and I mean the internal separation has been progressing as planned, with the exception of that there was a quarter delay because of COVID. And it's now completed. So let's say, we are 1 quarter behind plan. Even if we will now push this through as quickly as possible, the earliest time we could do it would be at the very end of 2021, probably early 2022 because when we say internal separation, it's legal structure, it's capital, it's just ERP systems out in the legal entities and so on. But there are still things that needs to be done in terms of some generic systems in terms of building the organization, treasury and all of these things that you don't have if you don't have -- if you're not a stand-alone company yourself. So the time plan -- the quickest we can do it is in 15 months. And then it's -- or 12 to 15 months. And then when we look at that and say, okay, then we are at the end of the 2021, early 2022. We rather have another quarter or so to be able to execute in a good and efficient way here. And then we are in 2022. And then given where the market is, we said, okay, let's be clear then that it is -- we're aiming for 2022. It's not that we are on purpose delaying it, maybe more than a quarter because we simply want to have a more robust time plan. And then, of course, we have also said it has to be right -- the right circumstances then. But that is what we're aiming for. So again, I don't think we are delaying it much more than the original plan, regardless of what was said.

T
Tomas Eliasson
Executive VP & CFO

Can -- I could just add a few comments on that one. It's like, as Stefan said here, we have all the businesses as separate legal entities now. We have designed ERP systems, et cetera. We have operating models for everything, but it's like you have built a house, but we haven't moved in yet because we don't want to start to driving double costs until we actually know that we're going. So we have a lot of people to recruit in treasury and tax, in investor relations and then what have you. We have to commission the ERP systems, et cetera, et cetera. We have to get the engine running, so to say. And that takes a while. Then when we're up and running, you have to run the business internally with Sandvik as a 100% shareholder or shareowner for 2 quarters, for 6 months to get clearance from NASDAQ, then you can list.

E
Emelie Alm
Investor Relations Officer

Super. Thank you very much. It's now time for us to close the call for this time. And we are looking forward to host you again on our Virtual Capital Markets Day on the 3rd November. So thank you all for joining, and see you soon.