Nelly Group AB (publ)
STO:NELLY
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
13.1
31.65
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches SEK.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Nelly Group Webcast with Teleconference Q4 2021. [Operator Instructions]Today, I am pleased to present Kristina Lukes, CEO. Please begin your meeting.
Well, thank you. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Nelly Group Q4 2021 call. My name is Kristina Lukes. As usual, I will host this together with John Afzelius, CFO for Nelly Group.I will start off with a very brief picture on what Nelly is all about today and focus for the future. I will follow up with a wrap up of initiatives from 2021, setting the foundation for our future growth journey. John will take us through the key financials for the quarter, and thereafter open up for a Q&A session.I'd like to move to Slide 3. Nelly is an integral part of the young women's everyday life. Founded in Boras in 2004, built through influencer marketing and a go-to destination for 1.2 million customers. Our core customer, the young fashionista, who looks for inspiration and solutions to look and feel fab every day.To move on to the next slide, and the next one again. Thank you. Our customer and follower base is one of our core assets, key for us to both build and increase loyalty and frequency on our journey going forward. This is a picky target group. And we have, throughout the years, continued to grasp her attention and love. Some key community facts and figures are our 1.3 million followers on social media and 1.2 million active customers, a customer base that is growing, placing close to 3 million orders where 40% of our sales come from our own brand.Slide 5. We continue our focus on the repositioning of the brand Nelly. We have defined our core target group. Age is one parameter, 15-year-old to 25-year-old Nordic fashionista. We've started to build our offering outside of the core of the brand, party, into even more occasions such as every day.This expansion has been crucial to compensate for the pandemic effect in Nelly's previous core and largest product category, party dresses. The occasion party and nightlife naturally has taken a major hit caused by the pandemic.The third part of the repositioning is all about adding and strengthening brand attributes, growing our emotional relationship to our customers and followers. This enabling growth in loyalty, higher frequency and sustainable growth in organic traffic.Move to Slide 6. We build plans to drive frequency. Why? Well, our target group shops for her appearance around 20 times per year. With our large active customer base, with consumers that are aware of us and that like us, we are not content with our frequency around 2 times per year.Building awareness and relevance in more occasions are in plan to drive growth in frequency. Even if we have strengthened our presence in every day, we love Magdalena's comment yesterday on letting go of restriction, and I think the direct instruction to go out there and take on the party.Focus on our customer and building the best experience for our core target group will be in focus in 2022. That focus was split in 2020 and 2021 when we, during the pandemic, had to, but also took the opportunity to build a stronger Nelly. We've had a strong internal change program, all to build our platform for future growth that we're now investing in.Looking back at 2021, we set out for several large changes, and we've ticked the box on the majority of them. Centralizing our operations to Boras, close to Stockholm offices, we've moved to a new warehouse. We set out on an ambitious sustainability roadmap with all targets met for 2021. We have an updated assortment, relevant for more occasions, with less complexity and increased speed and the improved flexibility. And we have most key roles filled with the new management in place.Some activities have been started, but not yet completed. 3 of them being the full relaunch of the brand, launching of our new sites, and looking forward to our beta version within weeks and implementation of our new channel strategy.I'm particularly proud of the work that we've delivered on our sustainability strategy, some highlights from our 3 focus areas. Empowering femininity. We have more than 60% of our staff that is female. And I'm especially proud of the work done when recruiting to our warehouse positions with the majority of female employees.Fair and equal, where we've had strong progress when it comes to transparency. Respect the planet, happy to see 120% increase in sustainable materials and better cotton sourcing on more than 50% on our own brand.Fresh from the oven, I would like to share 2 ongoing initiatives under respect the planet. We have just launched our secondhand channel for members only in our community Nelly Lounge. We're also, during Q1, launching our reborn concept, where we've redesigned pieces in Boras from unsold Nelly denim stock, and stay tuned for a super cool collection.So let me finish off before I hand over to John with main highlights from the last quarter in 2021. We are growing 9% in our Nordic core business, and we have continuously during the quarter, improved efficiency in our marketing. We grow our customer base with higher engagement and our automated warehouse is starting to produce results.So with that, let me now hand over to you, John.
Thank you very much, Kristina. So moving on to Slide 12. Please let me go through the P&L and the financials for the fourth quarter.Net revenue grew by 3% in the fourth quarter, and we can now summarize that we did grow in all 4 quarters of the year in contrast to 2020 when net revenue declined, heavily impacted by the pandemic.It was pleasing to see that growth in our core Nordic D2C market picked up to 9%. The growth driver, as in previous quarter in 2021, was mainly healthy growth in the broad array of everyday fashion categories.Party fashion sales also grew, which we have not seen for several quarters, but are still significantly lower than the prepandemic level. So I do agree Kristina, the unleashing of the restrictions were actually taking -- removing the restrictions we're looking forward to.What did clearly weigh on sales growth in Q4, though, were lower B2B sales as deliveries to Zalando fell compared to Q4 2020. Nelly's own brand has since 2019 been available to European customers on Zalando. And this wholesale business has been -- since then been a small, but sensible add-on to Nelly's core Nordic D2C business. And it's been a way for us to supply European customers with the Nelly brand on continental markets. And especially since we did exit the continental markets in early 2020.And while demand for Nelly's brand on Zalando has been growing -- growing nicely, Zalando is transitioning towards a marketplace model. And we have so far decided not to accept the offer to transition to such a model, hence the lower delivered volumes in Q4.Moving on to return rates. The return rate for Q4 was 35.1% compared to 32.5% last year. The increase was partly due to lower B2B sales, as I mentioned, for which we have no returns, but also as returns were at very low levels during the period of March 2020 to March 2021.However, we should remember that the 35% return rate in the quarter is approximately 2 percentage points lower compared to levels that we saw before the pandemic. So why is the rate lower now? Well, compared to historical levels, a main explanation is both product mix, sales mix, but also active measures such as excluding customers with an unsustainable return behavior that we did implement in 2020.So moving on to gross margin. Gross margin increased to 43.4% compared to 42.7% in Q4 2020 and gross profit consequently grew by SEK 8 million. And the main reason for the higher gross margin are both a higher underlying margin, but also lower inventory write-downs and loss-generating outlet sales compared to last year. And as we've seen in the last few quarters, we have been effectively managing inventory levels, keeping levels of old stock down, and this is a direct consequence of that.Higher inbound delivery freight expenses has been on everyone's lips for the last few months and quarters. And it did reduce the gross margin by about 0.5 percentage points in Q4. In addition to this direct negative effect on gross margin, we did see delays in frictions in the inbound supply chain, but also caused indirect expenses as for additional work in both operations and purchasing, but it also led to changes to plans for campaigns. So added frictions in essence.Just to conclude on gross margin. One major driver for Nelly's gross margin is the share of own brand sales. And the 38% that we recorded now both in Q4 this year, but also last year, is well below the 43% to 45% range that we've generated in the last few years. And it is a clear target for us to increase this share in 2022 and beyond.So let me then guide you through the cost side of the P&L. Firstly, fulfillment and distribution costs were largely in line with last year and consequently decreased somewhat measured as a share of sales. Fulfillment costs fell, both in absolute terms and relative terms, as the new automated warehousing was operational during the entire quarter.Core processes of the automation solution achieved target efficiency for the project on several locations during the quarter, which is pleasing to see. Other parts of the flow still needs trimming and the team is now focused on achieving the targeted cost saving potential, and we're working hard for that. So a positive sign from the fulfillment sign.The other part of this line item, and actually the larger part, is the distribution cost, the cost of shipping our packages and parcels to the customers. And distribution costs grew during the quarter. This is primarily due to higher delivered volumes, but also due to package mix.Marketing costs, moving on to that line, amounted to SEK 44 million in Q4 or 10.9% measured as a share of sales. And while that 10.9% is slightly higher than in Q4 2020, it is significantly lower than the 13.2% that we recorded in Q3 2021. And changes in working methods within, in particular performance marketing, produced an increasingly positive effect during the quarter. So that is a reassuring to see.And thirdly, moving on to admin and other operating costs. They amounted to SEK 71 million compared to SEK 62 million a year ago, which is an increase of SEK 8 million compared to last year. And let me break that down for you.The main explanations to the increase are firstly, higher payroll expenses and -- which is primarily in effect of the notice that was given in Q3 2020, which had a positive impact on Q4 2020. Secondly, please remember that we have higher lease related depreciations in accordance with IFRS 16, which are recorded on this cost line, and this is because the new warehouse entered use in the quarter.Thirdly, we also saw higher expenses for IT and consultants, and this is a result of initiatives primarily within sales and marketing, but also brand repositioning that we are -- that we have launched. And we should also remember that 2020, as Kristina mentioned, was a year when we really drove down costs, did 2 rounds of notices and had a general very high focus on the cost side. I'm not saying we're letting up that pressure, but we are doing select initiatives that are driving up that cost.On the other hand, please also remember that we saw reduced expenses for group functions and administration for the list of Nelly Group. This also had a positive impact as these functions were fully integrated into Nelly's Boras-based administration in 2021. And I think this is the last quarter that we'll actually be discussing and presenting that line, because that is now done and dusted. So in all, EBIT in the quarter was SEK 3 million, lower than last year, primarily that is due to the cost inflation in admin and other operating costs.So if we continue to Slide 13, I'd like to draw your attention to few other topics from the Q4 report. Firstly, please look at 2 important metrics. We saw an average order value of SEK 751 in Q4 in the Nordics. This is markedly higher than the SEK 702 million in 2020, same quarter. And a higher AOV is beneficial in several ways, not least as regards to our fulfillment and distribution costs in relation to sales.Secondly, Nelly saw a higher number of active customers for the second consecutive quarter. And we were then backing a declining trend that we've seen for several quarters, not least during the pandemic quarters of 2020 and the beginning of 2021.Secondly, inventory turnover remained at attractively high levels in Q4. I've been saying this for quite a few quarters now, and I like it just as much each and every time. Inventory share of sales amounted to a sound 12.6%, which is slightly higher than the 11.9% that we saw last year, but it is markedly lower than the pre-Q2 2020 levels of about 20%.A low volume older inventories or in other words a fresh stock imply a more attractive customer offering and a lower risk of loss generating outlet sales. And we have, during the last 2 years, focused on reducing stock levels by lowering the target for outgoing season stock levels. We continue to focus on maximizing in-season sales and thereby minimizing outgoing stock levels as we believe that this is supportive of margins over the product cycle and is more capital efficient.Lastly, cash flow in Q4 was a positive SEK 57 million and was dominated by a positive cash flow from operations of SEK 70 million. Cash at the end of the quarter amounted to SEK 198 million, and we continue to leave our credit facilities untapped as we have done for the last few quarters.It's also worth mentioning that Nelly Group has inherited more than SEK 600 million in tax loss carryforwards, which imply that Nelly will not be paying tax for the next few years.So to conclude, we closed Q4 with a solid cash position, unutilized credit facilities and apart from government tax credits, no interest-bearing debt. So having rushed through these financial highlights, Kristina, I'd like to hand it over to you again.
Well, thank you, John. And thank you for listening to our presentation. We look forward to answering any of your questions.
[Operator Instructions] And the first question is from Nick Fharm, SEB.
So my first question would be, if you could give us a slightly more detailed update on the progress of the savings from implementing the new DC, please. You're obviously reiterating the target savings for this year of SEK 35 million, and it would just be very interesting to hear what you have been able to take out so far, please?
Yes. Should I take that?
Go ahead.
And I'll just back up a bit -- back the tape up a bit, Nicklas. You know our numbers very well. But fulfillment and distribution costs, they consist of 2 line items. Distribution costs, which is the larger one, which is typically -- which is the cost of shipping the goods to the customers. And then secondly, fulfillment costs. And the project is focused on fulfillment costs. And we saw 2 effects. And as I mentioned, fulfillment costs went down both in share of sales and in absolute terms compared to the last quarter, which is a direct effect of the project.Sorry, and as I mentioned, we -- in the core process, we're actually achieving, already in Q4, on several locations the targeted efficiency gains in the core process in the automation, in the Autostore. Some of the more peripheral processes, we're not yet as efficient, and we've also seen rather high sickly breaks considering Omicron not -- still at levels we can handle, but it has been impacting the cost base. So more staffing in the peripheral processes. So in essence, we do see an improvement, a clear improvement in fulfillment cost. And we are -- we remain confident that we will realize these -- the targeted levels in the quarters going forward.So while not explicitly answering your question, I think, we're not entirely there yet, and we did not expect to be. And we are seeing significant positive changes, but not the full effect in Q4. And let me just -- because I received some questions along the same lines through e-mail.And please remember also that we're seeing a 9% sales growth. So also in the fulfillment cost side, we are handling more volume than last year. So it's not directly comparable in absolute terms, so that's why it's important to also look at the share of sales. And the share of sales for the fulfillment cost is going down year-on-year, which is a pleasing first signal to see from the first quarter for the new warehouse in full operation. So lengthy answer, but I wanted to lay out the background there as well, Nicklas.
Excellent. That's very well received. So my second question would be, it seems like sort of the overall online market data suggests continuing declines in site traffic, including for you. And my question is, how should we look upon or how do you plan sort of marketing expenditures in Q1 or 2022 given where we are essentially?
But I think…
Do you expect to pick up or will it just match traffic or how should we forecast marketing spend?
I think going back to our marketing channel strategy, we aim to strengthen our organic traffic. And when it comes to bought traffic, that's also a clear focus for us that we've mentioned before to continuously optimize the bought traffic. So if I start off with the traffic that we actually buy, it's about improving the efficiency, and I'm not that concerned with the absolute level, it's more about the quality of traffic that we buy in order to convert that better. And naturally, when we look at organic traffic, the probability of high conversion from that traffic is higher because per definition, our consumer is already very interested in Nelly. So it's a combination of the both.
And if I may add to that. You're quite right, and it's -- you can just look at -- I mean, market data or our data that the online marketing -- the market for online marketing has been a tight one for several quarters. So -- but our job is, of course, to look at what we're doing in Nelly. And as we -- it's no secret that we weren't happy with the -- we did changes to how we, in particular, by marketing last summer. And we did see that 13.2% share of marketing in Q3, which was a clear negative, of course.What's pleasing to see is that, now changed -- I mean, the new ways of working, also a consequence of the changes within last summer and how we're trimming and working actively on a day-to-day basis is yielding results. So on that component, we're pretty optimistic.When it comes to the other side, what Kristina is mentioning is, I mean, the activity level that we are doing now in Nelly when it comes to marketing channels and new marketing channels, is markedly higher than in previous quarters. This, of course, has a cost side to it, but it also -- what we're aiming to do is, of course, to improve the quality of that traffic, as just as Kristina mentioned.
And also strengthening the community as such. So the presence and the awareness and the time spent in the Nelly universe for our customers and followers, we aim to get that higher because we believe that will, of course, both drive frequency and loyalty.
So to sum up, you're, obviously, trying to figure out what kind of share of marketing should I assume for the next few quarters?
Yes.
And there are -- what I'm saying is there are positive underlying trends when it comes to performance marketing, which is a big chunk of our spend. But there are also, I mean, investments that we're doing in other channels then the more traditional that we strongly believe will help us generate more organic traffic and improve the quality of that. So rather balanced in the way.
But I appreciate the cost discussion in a sense versus the investment perspective that you have to take on things. But I guess, if I'm understanding you correctly, you had 11% of sales and marketing in 2021 full year, right? So it sounds to me that the ambition is that, that should be lower in 2022 rather than higher net?
I'd say, on a like-for-like basis, if 2022 were 2021 were the same working methods, yes. But we're also -- as we're saying, we're also shifting that spend towards other channels and how that exactly is, I mean, difficult to say. But I mean, we're rather investing what we're saving in the other end in new channels, because that is an investment for the future and that will -- that we believe strongly will generate better quality and more organic traffic.
Yes.
So let me try and summarize again then. So my best understanding is that, if you can be on par in terms of total marketing spend to sales in 2022, that's probably the best guess at this stage.
I mean, that's your words. But I mean, it…
Yes, of course.
I mean, where we have a -- it's difficult for us to be that specific, but it doesn't sound like we…
Of course, I appreciate that. All right. Final question. What have you possibly seen so far -- and thank you for walking us through the gross margin bridge, but a few more questions on that. What have you seen so far in terms of cost inflation, and what do you expect for the first half of 2022 in terms of bought-in margins? What are your plans and thoughts?
Yes. I mean, we -- in the conference that you hosted, and that we participated in just a few weeks ago, we outlined a longer-term perspective on Nelly's gross margin. And it's -- there are few clear drivers to our gross margin. For the last 2.5 years, we've been averaging about 44% in gross margin. The 2.5-year period prior to that, we averaged close to 50% gross margin. So why is gross margin 6 percentage points down then on an LTM basis from that period? Well, there are a few reasons for that.Firstly, our share of own brand sales fell during that period. From -- as I mentioned in the presentation, we're now at 38%. We used to be and should be in that 43% to 45% range that we were during that period. I will come back to the reasons for the share of own brand sales.Second reason is that we went into that period starting mid-2019, with relative -- with significant levels of old stock. So during the second half of 2019 and going into the first half of 2020, we took the consequence of that by realizing that inventory, both in our own channels, direct-to-consumers, but also throughout by sales channeling -- channels and that is impactful on -- it has a clear negative effect on margins.And then thirdly, without being too specific, it's also a U.S. dollar environment, of course, that was painful during that period. So then if you turn that perspective going forward, we're now at a 38% share of own brands. Are we happy with that? Definitely not. We want to return to and at least return to old levels of share of own brand sales. And we do expect to be better than -- or to have a higher share than in 2021 going into next year. And then secondly -- and secondly, we do have a fresh stock, so we're not expecting that level of clearance sales that we did -- clearly did in 2019, and second half and 2020.
If I can add just a qualitative comment on the -- I mean, one of the key drivers, as John mentioned, is our share of own brands to drive margin improvement, which is, of course, a clear focus for us. Back to the effect from the pandemic, where we've had a major hit on our largest product category of party dresses with a very high share of own brand, we worked a lot on improving and continuously improving own brand share in other categories. So we're setting out for a higher ambition.
Yes. Excellent.
The next question is from Ebba Bjorklid, DNB.
So I have a couple of questions. So firstly, it was encouraging to see yet another quarter of increasing number of customers. I would like to just get a little bit more clarification around what you think drove this, was it that you now are expanding in terms of the new channel initiatives, live shopping, et cetera? So just a little bit more clarity around that and what you expect. So if we can see this trend continuing going forward?
I think it is a combination of reasons for us seeing the growth in our customer base. One of them is, just as you say, our presence in the new channels, but it's also how we activate and work with our offering on a day-to-day basis. So being relevant towards our core target group at every given time. So ensuring we have the right offering, whether it's assortment or pricing or the right context on a much more granular basis.
Perfect. And my next question, let me see here, because there was quite a few already answered. So in terms of with -- a few of the costs, we -- the higher costs in terms of admin and other operating expenses, and you gave some overview of this, but it would also be interesting to hear a little bit on, for example, IT and personnel costs going forward throughout this year, what we can be expecting versus what we saw in 2021.
So if I start off, and then you can add, John, I think 3 main reasons. One is Q4 2021 in comparison to Q4 2020 where we really had and needed to push down costs, so the -- there was a positive effect on Q4 2020, so comparison is difficult. The other part is linked to investment, especially in consultants in tech. So a lot of the initiatives that we have been working on for a while that we're going live with one is, of course, our new site that we will go live within weeks. So it's part of the initiatives for future growth going forward.
Yes. I think that summarizes. We were reasonably detailed on the breakdown of that cost base. There are a few reasons, but at a high level, we -- between -- if you look in the rearview mirror from '19 to '20, we did push down costs rather aggressively, driving 2 rounds of notices in 2020, putting a strain on a large number of cost items. We're not letting up that cost pressure entirely, of course, but we are doing select investments or -- that drives both salary costs and consulting costs in Q4 in relation to the last year. We also had, as I mentioned in the report, some cost that we took in Q3 -- we had positive effects in Q4 2020 from the notice that we announced in Q3 2020, so that also helped.Secondly, we do have -- the depreciations are going up. That is included in that cost line, which is a direct consequence of us taking the new automated warehouse into use in Q3, and we're then starting to depreciate that according to IFRS 16. And for balance sheet interested readers, you can also see that those -- the balance sheet is grossed up on both sides by the lease effect according to IFRS 16. So I think that's, to give a bit more flavor on that.And going forward -- you asked going forward, and it's difficult for us to give you a number, of course. We're not -- we don't expect, I mean, significant inflation going forward. I mean, if you -- I mean if you don't -- if you -- apart from the IFRS 16 effect, which is, I mean, a clear difference, where we're expecting some inflation, of course, but not -- relatively modest, I'd say.We are not planning -- we are not planning to increase staffing significantly. I mean, staffing is clearly down from 2019 levels, and we're not expecting to increase that significantly.
I think you mentioned, you said select investments, and I think that's something that you should bring forward. Keeping cost pressure is extremely important in a business like ours. So that will -- that is very high on the agenda, but to invest in selected initiatives going forward, absolutely.
Great. And one more question from me, please. In terms of the inventory turnover that is looking very good, and you have done a lot in terms of improving that, and you've been talking about maximizing the in-season sales. So I would just like to know, do you have any -- or could you give any indication if there is more things that you could do to maximize that further so we can see an even greater improvement to gross margins and if this is in the plans over the next coming years?
So if I start off with the answering, is it in the plans? Oh, yes. And why? Well, we -- key for us is to make sure that we have a relevant offering to our target group at all times. That demands that we keep a fresh stock and that we're quick and flexible throughout our supply chain. That is the continuous journey that we're on. We've taken some major steps throughout the last year. We will continue to have that in focus. And a gross margin is a focus for us to grow, and this is a key parameter to make sure that we keep our inventory fresh, because we're working with fresh goods. So yes, it's the answer.
And let me add to that. I mean, the -- it's been very helpful and beneficial, especially as a CFO to see the cash flow impacts of that, that were as -- when we're turning over our inventory in this way. I mean, we -- our customers -- we receive payments from customers in a couple of days, paying our suppliers, obviously, between 60 days to 90 days. So by turning the inventory around, we -- as we've had for the last few quarters, we have a negative working capital to sales position.While -- and you asked basically should I assume even higher inventory turnover rates going forward? And I would be -- I mean, moving inventory turnover up to this level has been, I mean, challenging, of course, because it has -- it's obviously easier to grow your sales if you have ample inventory. So it's challenging, of course, to keep a slim and targeted focus inventory and still drive sales. So there is a balancing act there.So what I'm trying to say is it's been a huge priority back in 2020. We're not letting up the foot off that inventory turnover pedal, but it's not -- but it's also not at the same time, the main priority to drive it up even further. We're very happy with the levels we're seeing now. We didn't increase the level from 2020 to '21, which was perfectly according to our plan. And so I wouldn't make aggressive assumptions going forward on turning over the inventory even further, because we'd much rather drive sales and drive sales from this level, then increase the inventory turnover even further, initially at least.
Yes. I can add, now, this is also a key activity to -- in our sustainability roadmap. I think that's sometimes forgotten when we talk about our focus on materials, for example. But in order -- the focus on turning inventory and keeping a low outgoing stock means that we're taking care of the resources that we're utilizing. So it's also core from a sustainability point of view.
Great. And actually, before I hand over to the next person asking questions, I would actually just love to follow up on this ESG and sustainability since you mentioned that, Kristina. It would just be very interesting to hear because you've done so much work now in terms of ESG and sustainability. So what has been the customer response in terms of the increased ESG focus from Nelly. What have you heard, or seen and maybe difficult part of the increasing in customers.
I think we haven't quantified that, but it's part of everything we do in order to improve the relationship with our customers. I think the easiest and quickest things to react to are, of course, the direct, concrete activities such as secondhand channel or specific collections or the facts, that's easier for the customers to see rather than the continued strong improvement in sustainable materials, for example. So I think on those initiatives, there are thumps up, and not only thumps up, but a lot of positive interactions and new ideas generated from our community when we do things.
And the next question is from [ Tobias Estobach ].
I just like you to elaborate a little bit about the return rate. How much of an issue that is for a company? And what kind of measures you're taking to -- for that?
If I can start off. We are 100% online. So our store and our return rate is part of our business model. We have a very clear ambition to have 0 unnecessary returns. And what the heck does that mean? Well, in some occasions, we will have returns because the product will not fit or the size of the shoe was a little bit too tight. But there are multiple returns that we can work with, all through the value chain. So from being clear and transparent and direct to the customer about what the garment is all about, the look and feel, size, et cetera, throughout the entire purchasing journey.I think John mentioned that we are down 2 percentage points in returns in comparison to prepandemic levels. And that is the result of several initiatives working on assortment in the specific markets, working on how we set up the structure per market, everything from the cost of returning to how we return and the direct feedback that we have from returns to our assortment department, adjusting the products in according to feedback from our customers. And we've also blocked a number of customers that utilize the ability or the opportunity or possibility to return. It is a big cost to handle returns. So it has to be an important priority.
Let me add to that. I mean, the -- as Kristina said, it's a natural part of our business. And the return rate is also clearly linked to what type of industry -- sorry, not industry, but what type of customers you're dealing with and what type of product categories. We have huge differences between categories when it comes to return rates. So the product mix you have determines your return rate to a large degree, but also the initiatives. So I think, it's -- we are -- the return rate is down, it's partly due to mix effects, but it's also clearly part due to the continuous work that we're doing with the returns. And we're rather happy with quite a few of them. Are we entirely happy and done? Definitely not. This is, I mean, a fashion e-commerce company, we'll always work with returns of goods.
Just a follow-up on that one. You mentioned excluding customers, can you just give me a sort of number on how many you excluded during 2021 comparing to maybe like the year before that?
Yes. We started excluding customers in early -- in the first half of 2020. And initially, we haven't been specific on the number, but it's in the order of magnitude of 2,000 customers. After that, we have a routine of checking regularly, what type of customers bounce into those cohorts of customers that we think are unsustainable. So we, on a regular basis, continue to add to that, and it's order of magnitude 4,000 customers.
Both add. But I would also say that some customers actively come back and say, I can't purchase. And then we have a dialogue with them looking at, of course, the prerequisite for that customer to come back.
Yes. And you got a question this morning, Kristina, how do customers react? And we've actually been -- the reaction hasn't been that fierce. Of course, some customers don't really understand, but we invite customers to contact our customer support. We explain to them why we think their behavior is unsustainable. And in many occasions, they understand and they can also adapt. And I think that has a lot to do with the growing importance of sustainability everywhere, because it's easy to understand that an unsustainable return behavior is not only unsustainable from a financial perspective, but also from a sustainability perspective.
Just a final question, and I will shut after that. You said that excluding customer, but can you just give me a sort of like a brief picture of that? I mean, how much or in what kind of degree have these customers returned products from you to get excluded? Just to give me a sort of picture of the problem?
Yes. We have several different cohorts. And it's a combination of return rates that you not only did it once because, of course, if you're a onetime customer, you buy a jacket and it didn't fit your return rate will be 100%. So in order to fall into those cohorts -- we have a small handful of them -- you need to be returning -- have returns -- high return rates, and you need to do that a number of times before you're thrown into that cohort. But we're talking that you basically -- you return every time, you have a return in each and every order you make, and you do that rather often and the return rate is well above our average of 35%.
Absolutely, I mean we're talking like 90%. So I think that's also a calibration. I think that we've learned quite a lot from these activities. And in some cases, I think we can be much more, I wouldn't say, strict but have a more direct dialogue with our customers on what's the cost or the effect of your behavior, because that's also what the customer wants. The customer also wants to act more sustainable. So let's help them.
And we do have a follow-up question from Nicklas Fharm from SEB.
So just one final question. So you're, obviously, running at about SEK 8 million a quarter or so in terms of depreciating your right-of-use assets. And my question is just, should we expect any increase or changes in the -- in this balance sheet item in 2022 for whatever reason? Or is this kind of a run rate for 2022 as well?
Yes. I think the short answer is yes. I mean the best estimate is to extrapolate that. And we were running at roughly SEK 10 million a year of depreciations in total, including IFRS 16 effects.
Right.
Yes, sorry, SEK 10 million a quarter, but that was pretty clear.
SEK 10 million a quarter, yes. Absolutely.
And we haven't received any further questions at this point. I hand back to the speakers.
Well, again, thank you all for participating, and thank you for some very nice, good questions.
Thank you.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your attendance. This call has been concluded. You may disconnect now.