Engie SA
PAR:ENGI
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
13.205
16.55
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning. We are very happy to share with you our good 9 months results. We are here together with Judith Hartmann, our CFO; and Paulo Almirante, our COO. We will start with a short presentation, and then we'll be happy to answer your questions.So our 9 months '19 results show, as expected, an acceleration in earnings growth. We are very proud of these results. They show that our strategic choices are bearing fruits. We confirm our full year '19 guidance, and '19 is the first year of a new period after 3 years of in-depth restructuring and strategic repositioning. And we then enter in a net growth phase following our in-depth transformation. As I have mentioned, the last quarters have demonstrated a sustained upturn in performance over the last quarter. On the Nuclear front, we have delivered the major improvement in our operational availability, as promised, and this is a key achievement. Our momentum in Renewables, wind, in particular, has accelerated dramatically, providing clear evidence of our execution success towards achieving our aggressive ambitions for growth in capacity and profit in the coming years. Looking at the first 9 months of '19. Our impressive organic core growth of 14% was driven by: first, Nuclear, of course, with much improved availability of our 7 Belgium reactors as well also as better prices; second, Thermal with, in particular, PPA portfolio growth in Latin America and higher volumes and margins in Australia, we also got some positive LDs; third, Energy Management with successful long-term gas contract renegotiations and continuous optimization of the energy positions of our other businesses, a big strategic and synergistic set of capabilities. These positives were partly offset by a reduction in our Networks contribution, as we anticipated, and this is mainly driven by temporary gas transmission average impact. Against this, we are pleased to note the first contribution of TAG in Brazil following the acquisition earlier this year. And finally, Client Solutions. These activities show, most importantly, continuous acceleration. Our commercial performance is good. We continue to take a lot of actions to increase our performance and improve our margins. And we also benefited from positive one-offs from SUEZ. Let's now have a look at the numbers, which are, as I have mentioned, represents the best group performance in many years. EBITDA and COI were EUR 7.1 billion and EUR 3.8 billion, up, rising organically by plus 7% and plus 14%, respectively. This strong acceleration was in line with our expectations. Net debt stands at EUR 26.7 billion, a gross increase of EUR 3.4 billion versus the end of '19, mostly due to the TAG acquisition, to the extraordinary dividend paid in May in year of '19 and also due to the impact on our CFFO of margin calls. And indeed, while our operating cash flow increased in the first 9 months, our CFFO decreased mostly due to the commodity margin call timing and movements in other financial derivatives. And now, I will hand over to Judith to look at our financials in more detail.
Thank you, Isabelle, and good morning, everybody. Let's now look at our 9 months performance by business line. First, Client Solutions. Our businesses have delivered a sustained trend improvement since the first quarter. Commercial development is positive with 9 months revenue up 10%. COI increased 4%, excluding the favorable EUR 50 million settlement between SUEZ and the Argentine government earlier this year. This result was driven in part by higher decentralized energy tariffs and good on-site generation performance. Certain service segments are seeing some margin pressure, and like Isabelle just mentioned, we are working on shoring up our operational activities there and industrializing our offerings and operations. This will create greater cost efficiency as we scale up, driving operating leverage and higher profitability. We are also further scrutinizing the economics of each service sector and becoming more selective in where we compete, focus on differentiation in our capabilities and solutions. Meanwhile, we are seeing sustained growth in business volume and profit across most of Europe. Operationally, we continue to increase our installed district heating and cooling capacity to 5.6 gigawatt and backlog continues to rise, reaching close to a year of revenues. Looking ahead to the full year outlook. We expect a continuation of a similar rate of COI growth as we've seen year-to-date. This is in the mid-single-digit range towards the lower end of the range we communicated at H1, in light of new and increased business development costs and the competitive dynamics that I've mentioned. With respect to strategic business development, I would highlight that our launch of ENGIE Impact is a milestone, furthering our industry leadership in designing and enabling the 0 carbon ambitions of our clients. Finally, I would like to draw your attention to our upcoming quarterly investor seminar next week focused on Client Solutions. Our business line and IR teams look forward to setting out a strong and transparent platform of insight for the investor community. They will focus on the details of our growth strategy and how the business works operationally and financially across several complementary business models. Let's now move to Networks, where COI was down 8% primarily driven by gas transmission as in the first half. This is in line with our expectations and due to 2 factors for gas transmission: first, a negative volume effect in France, mainly due to the merger of the north and south gas market zones. This led to the end of North-South transfer revenues, the impact of which will be largely recouped over the next 2 years through a regulated expense and income clawback account. Second, as anticipated in our current regulatory mechanism, GRTgaz 2019 revenues are subject to smoothing, a delayed true-up mechanism to cover operating costs which covers the 2017-2021 time frame. The April 2019 annual revenue revision only partially cover the additional operating and D&A costs incurred by GRTgaz, primarily related to the Val de Sa�ne project. In storage, the numbers continue to reflect our H1 headwinds. Technical issues in France during the withdrawal period incurred client penalties. Also, certain German contracts were renewed at lower prices in a difficult market environment. All of this was mentioned already at H1. We are pleased to note our first equity accounted earnings coming from TAG, following the June acquisition, bringing us a 4,500 kilometers gas transmission network in Brazil. In French distribution, GRDF profit was slightly up, benefiting from a tariff increase and additional smart meters. Indeed, our smart meter rollout is well underway with 4.3 million installed to date. Warmer temperatures resulted in a reduction of 2.9 terawatt hours in gas distributed in France year-on-year. We reiterate our full year Network outlook: a low single-digit decrease, mainly due to French gas transmission and storage headwinds, partly offset our TAG contribution. Let's now move to Renewables. COI was up 4% on a gross basis over the 9 months. Our wind and solar activities are posting an impressive performance, with more than 60% organic COI growth. We benefited from higher sell-downs to date in 2019. The earnings increase was also driven by the commissioning of new wind capacities. We have indeed commissioned 1.8 gigawatts since January 2019, notably in Brazil, and we benefit from the contribution of these assets, together with the ramp-up of the ones commissioned last year. Overall, wind and solar power production grew by 48% year-on-year. As of today, we have almost entirely secured our 2021 target of 9 gigawatt additional renewable capacity, with more than 1.4 gigawatt to be installed in Q4 2019, and 3 to 4 gigawatts next year. On hydro, we're still suffering from the lower French volumes with an unchanged impact over Q3. On the other hand, performance of hydroelectric power generation was slightly better in Brazil. Regarding the full year outlook for renewables, we have reduced our expectations mainly due to the Brazilian reform law, with a postponement to 2020 of the compensation related to past losses and, to a lesser extent, due to a lower-than-average French hydro level in the third quarter. Turning to Thermal. We delivered a 4% growth COI increase for the 9 months despite the large scope effect of Glow disposal in March of this year. From an organic point of view, we benefited from the favorable impact of liquidated damages received in Latin America in 2019, the ramp-up in Latin America PPA contracts and positive market price conditions in Chile and strong Australian performance, including higher power production volumes and prices. These positive effects were partially offset by higher LNG sourcing costs for EcoEl�ctrica, a gas plant in Puerto Rico and lower capacity prices for the Astoria gas plant in the U.S. Also, we were impacted by the suspension of U.K. capacity market mechanism payments since October 2018. The good news here, of course, is that this mechanism has been reinstated a few days ago, so this negative effect will fully reverse in 4Q with a positive retroactive impact. Operationally, European gas-fired merchant power production was up 25% and coal now represents only 6% of our total capacity. For Thermal, we maintain our full year 2019 outlook with an expected COI reduction of approximately 15%. This is mainly due to the Glow disposal, 4Q 2018 liquidated damages in the Netherlands and the strong prior year performance of our gas fleet during the Nuclear outages in Belgium. This is partly offset by 2019 LDs in Latin America that I've just mentioned and by the reinstatement of the U.K. capacity market mechanism, as I also mentioned. Moving to Nuclear. Nothing surprising, but really impressive figures after a very challenging 2018. As long-awaited and expected, Nuclear COI was indeed up 56%, nearly EUR 300 million on the back of the successful restart of all of our Belgian reactors, resulting in higher output volumes, up 25%, plus 6.3 terawatt hours, as availability rose significantly from 57% to 79%. And of course, we also had a better impact on prices where we had achieved prices of EUR 2 per megawatt hour. It is worth noting that nuclear COI remains negative in absolute numbers, volumes produced were sold at an average of EUR 36 per megawatt hour. And over the next few years, the chief price is set to increase significantly with the current Belgium forward power price standing at approximately EUR 50 per megawatt hour. Following the latest availability adjustment published. We slightly adjust our 2019 full year outlook downward compared to the end of H1 with 2018 losses now expected to be cut by 70% instead of 75%. On the next slide, in Supply, the significant COI reduction of 33% was mainly driven by lower results in business sales in Benelux and in the United States, and continuing margin pressure in French retail. This was only partly offset by increased power margins in French business supply. Over the last 12 months, we continue to increase our retail power customer base interest by 0.4 million as well as our service customers by 0.6 million. On the other hand, we lost 300 -- 0.3 million customers in gas, mainly on regulated offers in France. Here, again, mainly based on the 9-month actual figures, we had to slightly adjust our 2019 full year outlook downward for Supply. We now expect a reduction of approximately 15%. Lastly, our Others activities performed very well with a 65% COI increase. This is mainly due to our Energy Management business whose performance has notably benefited from the positive effects of gas contract renegotiations, and from the agreement on the partial transfer of a gas supply contract to Shell that was signed in the third quarter of this year. Energy Management performance also benefited from international development and from favorable market conditions characterized by volatility, especially on the gas commodity. And growth is all the more impressive as 2018 already had been a good year, with favorable conditions linked in particular to the cold snap at the beginning of last year. In addition, our latest group efficiency program, Lean 2021, has begun to deliver cost savings at the corporate level, and we benefit from a favorable comparable due to the cost of the Link 2018 employee shareholding plan. Based on this actual performance coming mainly from Energy Management, we are able to improve the 2019 full year outlook and expect now that our 2018 losses will be cut by 35% instead of 15%. Turning to cash flows with the classic waterfall on the next slide. CFFO was down by EUR 1 billion year-on-year, mainly due to timing effects from commodity-related margin calls and financial derivatives coming from our Energy Management activities. This was partly offset by a favorable evolution of operational working capital requirements coming from our Energy Management activities due to a decrease of CO2 inventories and gas inventories in France and Italy. Our operating cash flow is in line with the EBITDA and thus shows an increase. We expect CFFO to significantly increase in Q4, mostly on the back of a reversal of margin calls and financial derivatives. With this, back to Isabelle.
Thank you, Judith. So in conclusion, I would simply reiterate our key takeaways for today. First, our 9 month '19 results show, as expected, an acceleration in earning growth. We are very proud of these results. And I would like to thank all my colleagues who have driven this remarkable acceleration in performance, not just for our notable success this year, but more importantly, for the steady progress that we have achieved in recent years, in building the underlying strategic and capability platforms, which are responsible for this much improved momentum. And I have great conviction that this progress will continue to deliver sustained underlying performance momentum well into the future. So let's now take your questions. Operator, over to you.
[Operator Instructions] We will now take our first question from Emmanuel Turpin of Societe General.
My first question is on customer solution, please. I would love to understand what has deteriorated in the business during the summer that drew you to reduce your guidance outlook for the full year. You did mention some problematic businesses in Canada that was already highlighted in the first half. Did the situation -- is the situation worse than you thought in those contracts? Or are there other headwinds that have materialized across the board? I would love to get more granularity there. Second question would be a quick one on renewables. Would you help us quantify the farming down gains booked in 9 months last year or 9 months this year? Or if you can give us an absolute number for the 2 periods, maybe the delta between the 2 years? And lastly, how much do you expect to book in the fourth quarter in terms of U.K. capacity mechanism revenues, please?
Emmanuel, on the first question, which is around Client Solutions. Quite frankly, if you look at the actual numbers, the decrease is relatively limited of the outlook. We're talking about EUR 10 million, EUR 20 million. And so the difference really is mostly coming from some of the restructuring that was mentioned. Canada, no news. But there is a couple of other contracts that we're working on. But also never forget that we are investing into this activity, and you saw our launch of ENGIE Impact, and that is obviously creating some short term costs. But quite frankly, not worried about this because like I said, it is relatively small in terms of numbers, of what the changes from what we said in the first half. Then you had a question on the DBSO sell down for renewables to 9 months year-to-date. And in fact, it is an interesting question because there's some timing difference this year versus last year. This year, it's roughly EUR 50 million, I would say, in the first 3 quarters. There was almost nothing last year, but then, of course, last year, we had a very significant fourth quarter. And so we will see that tamper out over the total year. And then lastly, your question on the U.K. capacity market reinstallation. It is going to be roughly EUR 60 million, so quite significant and very positive for us.
We will now take our next question from Peter Bisztyga of Bank of America.
Three questions, if I may. Firstly, I was wondering if you could just quantify the amount that you expect to be clawed back in the Networks business over the next 2 years from these North-South revenue transfers. Similarly, for Brazil, if you could sort of quantify what compensation is being deferred into 2020? Just following up on Emmanuel's question on renewables. Has your DBSO outlook for the fourth quarter changed over the last sort of 3 months? Are you expecting less than you were before? And if so, does that mean that there's going to be more phased in, in early 2020? And then just finally, on Networks, that business was down 8% in the 9 months, you're targeting sort of low single-digit decline in the full year. I sort of probably see TAG making up for all of that, an improvement. So I'm just wondering what else you're expecting to improve in the fourth quarter in Networks.
So Paulo, on the first question.
So on the clawback in transmission in France, discussions are taking place with the compensation chamber. So it is too early at this stage to give a figure for that. On the farm -- so [indiscernible] is a process, a legislative process in Brazil, which is established to compensate the dispatch of dams, which are out of the merit order, but to manage the reservoirs for water use. We expect this legislation to be put in place during 2020, but it depends on several chambers in the Brazilian legislative process. And so we don't know yet when it's going to happen. We are talking here of figures of the order of EUR 100 million.
Judith on the DBSO.
A very important question. Thank you. No, there's no change to our outlook in the fourth quarter. We had mentioned in the past roughly EUR 100 million, and that's what we are expecting. Obviously, the team's very much aligned on driving for this. Then you had a question on what is driving the difference between the Network's 9 months growth rate versus the total year growth rate, which is improving. Some of this, quite frankly, is a normalization because you will remember, as I mentioned, we had, in the first half, some pressure, mostly on Storengy on additional cost and price adjustments. And then, of course, like you mentioned, there will be a positive impact on TAG that is coming in, in the fourth quarter.
We'll take our next question from Arthur Sitbon of Morgan Stanley.
I have 2. The first one is could you quantify and walk us through the one-offs that you benefited from in the fourth quarter of 2018. I know there were abnormal gains in asset rotation and renewables, but I was wondering if there were any other positive one-offs last year? And the second question is whether you could please comment on where consensus stands basically at EUR 9.9 billion EBITDA for 2019 and EUR 2.5 billion net income for 2019?
I will take the second question first. On the total year outlook, basically, is your question. We're confirming guidance today very happily. What I would say is the -- you can expect the EBITDA indication also to be in line. There is, as always, certain risks and opportunities that we still work -- that could come in, the typical ones, foreign exchange, price, Nuclear. But what I would say is the teams are working. Those could be, by the way, upsides or downside. And the teams are really working to make sure that we secure this outlook. And so very comfortably, we are confirming our outlook for the total year. Then you had a question on fourth quarter unusual to last year. Quite frankly, I would mention mostly -- you mentioned yourself already the DBSO. And in addition to this, I would mention the LDs that we had in Thermal in Netherlands at the end of last year, which were close to EUR 90 million.
[Operator Instructions] We will now take our next question from Aymeric Parodi of UBS.
I have one question on the French hydro. Is there any update regarding the renewal of the CNR, La Compagnie Nationale du Rh�ne, concession and also including a change in the French tax, hydro tax?
On the CNR situation, no news. That is to say good news since we had very positive discussions with the EU commission. And then we expect to get a positive answer from the commission, and then effectively to get the renewable -- the renewal of this -- or more precisely, the extension of this concession for 18 years. On hydro tax, Judith?
No changes that I'm aware of.
We will now move to our next question from Vincent Ayral of JPMorgan.
I noticed that there's a fair amount of focus this morning on the change of -- the slight changes of the COI at the division level, something we didn't really see at H1 when you increased it. So I just wanted to check one thing, mathematically speaking. We have here a slight deterioration of the COI indication versus H1. But actually, if I do some math, I still see a tad better overall COI indication than was done at Q1, whilst you've not -- I mean, you've lost, you expect now the Brazilian compensation for 2020. So net-net, you would say everything else being equal, does that mean that you are slightly better still than at the beginning of the year in terms of outlook?
Yes. That is a fair statement. It's slightly better at the group level. Yes. There are some changes in between, of course, some puts and takes, but it is setting out to be a very strong year.
I would like to insist on that. We gave some explanation on each of our businesses. And what you can take from what we say is that in each of our businesses, we have good intrinsic performance and dynamic. This is very true for Renewable because we -- what we see this year if we treat the hydro conditions and the French hydro conditions is that the intrinsic performance of this business line is extremely dynamic. And it will be the case also for the end of the year. Even if we have some sell downs, profits that will be more for the beginning of '20, the intrinsic dynamic is extremely strong. And for Client Solution, the same, I would say. We started with the Q1 that was atypical, as we said. And everything we see in this business is extremely good. And our commercial performance is strong. We had a 10% increase in our revenues, which is, of course, extremely impressive. So we are extremely confident in the ability of these businesses to be extremely strong in the years to come.
We will now move to our next question from Piotr Dzieciolowski of Citi.
I have 2 questions. Can you quantify maybe the amount of the effects on the collaterals you expect in the fourth quarter, how much that could improve? And also on the net debt, do you see any other potential effects such as revision of the provision? Do you see any pressure of the Nuclear provisions to go higher for the full year? And the second question. I wanted to ask about the cost of the TAG debt acquisition. How much is that? That seems to push the overall contribution lower to your figures.
Judith?
So the line, unfortunately, was not very good. I'm not sure I understood your first question. I will -- let me start with the net debt. Like we said, the increase is, to some extent, temporary because there's about EUR 1 billion swing between what we would have done 3 quarter year-to-date and this year because we paid the interim dividend last year in October. Then of course, there is an increase of debt because of we invested into TAG, EUR 1.6 billion, as you know. And plus, we are doing, I would say, about EUR 1 billion of investments into Renewables. So -- and that obviously is translating, you saw it in the big increase that we're seeing in our installed capacity for renewables. The Nuclear provision serves the triennial revision that is ongoing. It's too early to talk about it. We will -- if 3 years ago with any guidance on calendar, we should know at the end of November at the beginning of December. All I can saying is there is constructive exchanges at this stage. And we will obviously keep you posted on this when we have more news. You had a question on the cost of TAG. It's about 5%. And then if you maybe -- if you want to maybe repeat what your question -- your first question was. Like I said, the line was breaking up while you were speaking.
Okay. I wanted to ask you, you said there would be a reversal of the collaterals on your trading positions for the net debt that can swing in the fourth quarter. Can you quantify how much would the effect, assuming let's say, market, I know there's a huge amount of volatility? But assuming we are where we are on the different FX and commodity prices.
Okay. Yes, I got your question, okay. So indeed, the CFFO, like I mentioned, is negatively impacted by the margin calls. Those are related to the economic hedges linked to our generation and supply activities. And they will recover over time when the related transactions will be settled. So we are expecting a favorable impact on the fourth quarter.
[Operator Instructions] We will now move to a follow-up question from Aymeric Parodi of UBS.
I think my questions were answered already.
There are no further questions over the audio at this time.
Okay. So we'd like to thank you for having attended this call, and we wish you a very pleasant day. Goodbye.