Subsea 7 SA
OSE:SUBC
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
|
US |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
Machinery
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
135.05
215.2
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches NOK.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
US | |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US | |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Thank you
for
standing
by,
and
welcome
to
the
Subsea
7
Q4
2021
Results
Conference
Call.
At
this
time,
all
participants
are
in
listen-only
mode.
There
will
be
presentation
followed
by
a
question-and-answer
session.
[Operator Instructions]
I
must
advise
you
that
the
conference
is
recorded
today,
the
3rd
of
March
2022.
I
would
now
like
to
hand
over
to the
speaker,
Katherine
Tonks.
Please
go
ahead.
Welcome,
everyone.
With
me
on
the
call
today
are
John
Evans,
our
CEO;
and
Mark
Foley,
our
CFO.
The
results
press
release
is
available
to
download
on
our
website
along
with
the
presentation
slides
that
we'll
be
referring
to
during
today's
call.
May
I
remind
you that
this
call
includes
forward-looking
statements
that
reflect
our
current
views
and
are
subject
to
risks,
uncertainties
and
assumptions.
Similar
wording
is
also
included
in
our
press
release.
I'll
now
turn
the
call
over
to
John.
Thank
you
and
good
afternoon,
everyone.
I
will
start
with
the
highlights
from
2021
before
passing
over
to
Mark
to
cover
the
financial
results.
Turning
to
slide
3.
Revenues
improved
45%
year-on-year
to
$5
billion,
and
our
adjusted
EBITDA margin
was
broadly
stable
at
10%,
giving
us
an
EBITDA
of
$521
million,
up
55%.
Operating
cash
flow
was
$293
million,
and
we
generated
free
cash
flow
of
$127
million,
resulting
in
net
debt
including
lease
liabilities
of
$55
million.
As
we
announced
with
our
results,
the
board
has
decided
to
adopt
the
regular
dividend
policy.
It
has
approved
the
total
return
to
shareholders
of
$100 million
in
2022,
comprising
of
a
regular
dividend
of
NOK
1
per
share,
and
a
share
repurchase
of
approximately
$70 million.
Both
the
regular
dividend
policy
and
the
buyback
marked
the
board's
confidence
in
the
financial
position
and
the
outlook
for
the
group.
During
the
year,
we
had
group
fleet
utilization
of
83%
with
activity
centered
on
Norway,
the
Gulf
of
Mexico,
and
Brazil.
Our
large
EPCI
projects
such
as
Seagreen,
Bacalhau,
Mero-3,
and
Sakarya
are
all
making
good
progress.
We
ended
2021
with
a
healthy
backlog
of
$7.2
billion
after
order
intake
of
$6.1
billion.
We
made
good
progress
in
our
strategies
for
both
the
subsea
and
the
wind
businesses,
and
increased
our
presence
in
the
floating
wind
market.
I
will
discuss
these
a
little
more
in
detail
later.
Turning
to
slide
4,
and
our
recent
operational
highlights.
The
engineering
and
procurement
phases
of
our
major
EPCI
projects
are
on
track.
In
Brazil,
fabrication
of
Bacalhau
project
is
progressing
well,
whilst
on
Mero-3,
engineering
is
underway.
In
Turkey,
we
have
started
preparatory
site
works
for
Sakarya
Phase
1.
In
Norway,
we
tested
and
commissioned
the
Electrical Heat
Traced Flowline (sic) [Electrically Heat Traced Flowline] (00:03:24) line on Ærfugl
2,
and
we
had
several
vessels,
including
Seven
Vega
working
on
Johan
Sverdrup
2,
although
we
incurred
some
downtime
for
weather.
In
the
Gulf of
Mexico,
we
towed
out
the
King's
Quay
FPU,
and
the
Seven Navica, Seven
Arctic,
and Seven
Oceans
all
contributed
to
installation
activities.
At
Jack
St
Malo,
the
production
flowlines
and
rises
were
completed
and
loading
out
of
equipment
to
the Seven Oceans
has
begun.
In
Renewables,
the
Seagreen
project
remains
on
track
with
10
foundations
installed
by
the
year
end
2021
and
a
further
11
installed
in
January.
Delivery
of
the
cables
to
our
base
in
Scotland
is
on
track
and
the
installation
of
the
first
cables
has
commenced.
The
remaining
foundations
and
inner-array
cables
will
be
installed
in
2022
as
planned.
Elsewhere,
Seaway
Strashnov
installed
34
for
monopole
foundations
on
Hollandse
Kust
Zuid
and
the
remaining
105
to
be
installed
during
2022.
Seaway
Aimery,
Seaway Moxie,
and
Simar
Esperança
all
continued
to
work
on
Hornsea
II.
Turning
to
slide
5.
We
had
a
very
good
year
for
new
awards
at
$6.1
billion,
up
38%
year-on-year,
resulting
in
a
book-to-bill
of
1.2.
Q4
awards included
Scarborough
in
Australia
and
the
three-year
PLSV
contracts
in
Brazil.
These
were
boosted
in
the
fourth
quarter
by
a
high
level
of
escalations.
By the
year
end,
the
backlog
could
reach
the
highest
levels
since
2015.
We
have
good
visibility
on
revenue
for
2022
with
$3.4
billion
to
be
executed
in
Subsea
and
Conventional
and
$0.9
billion
in
Renewables.
Our
backlog
for
execution
in
2023
is
$2
billion,
and
that
is
nearly 30%
ahead
of
the
level
for
the
equivalent
period
this
time
last
year.
And
now,
I'll
pass
over
to
Mark,
to
run
through
the
financial
results
in
more
detail.
Thank
you,
John,
and
good
afternoon,
everyone.
I'll
begin
the
financial
results
with
you
with
some
details
of
business
unit
performance
in
the
fourth
quarter
and
full-year,
before
returning
to
the
group
income
statement
for
some
additional
comments.
Slide
6
summarizes
the
fourth
quarter
performance
of
our
business
units.
Subsea
and
Conventional
generated
$1
billion
of
revenue,
44%
higher
than
the
prior
year
with
notable
contributions
from
Sakarya,
Bacalhau,
projects
in
the
Gulf
of
Mexico
and
Saudi
Arabia.
Renewables
revenue
was
$326
million,
up
49%
year-on-year,
mainly
driven
by
higher
revenues
from
the
Seagreen
project,
as
well
as
contributions
from Yunlin,
Hollandse
Kust
Zuid,
and
Hornsea
II.
Adjusted
EBITDA
for
Subsea
and Conventional
was
$143
million,
broadly
flat
year-on-year,
equating
to
a
lower
margin
of
14%
compared
with
18%
last
year.
This
decline
was
due
to
the
early
phase
of
projects
in
the
portfolio,
lower
client
settlements,
as
well
as some
costs
associated
with
waiting
on
weather
in
Norway.
Adjusted
EBITDA
for
Renewables
was
$10 million,
in
line
with
the
prior
year
period.
This
compares
with
the
adjusted
EBITDA
reported
by
Seaway
7
of
$30 million.
The
$20
million
difference
reflects a
charge on a
wind
project
in
Taiwan,
whose
economic
interest
was
retained
by
Subsea
7
as
part
of the
combination
with
OHT.
After
depreciation
and
amortization,
net
operating
income
for
Subsea
and
Conventional
was
$50
million
compared
to
our
$37
million
loss
in
the
prior
year
quarter,
which
includes a
$94
million
of
asset
impairment
charges
while
renewables
recorded
a
net
operating
loss
of
$12 million
compared
with
a
loss
of
$2
million
in
the
prior
year.
Coming
to
the
full-year,
Subsea
and
Conventional
revenue
increased
33%
to
$3.7
billion
while
revenue
from
renewables
doubled
to
$1.3
billion,
representing
25%
of
the
group
revenue.
The
greatest
contributions
in
the
year
were
from
Seagreen
and
Renewables;
and
the
Bacalhau,
Mad
Dog 2,
King's
Quay
and
Sakarya
projects
in
Subsea
and
Conventional.
Adjusted
EBITDA
for
Subsea
and
Conventional
was
$468
million,
up
10%
year-on-year,
equating
to
a
lower
margin
of
13%
compared to
16%
last
year.
This
was
mainly
due
to
the
execution
of
early
phases
of
projects
in
the
portfolio
awarded
at
a
relatively
low
margin
in
prior
years,
lower
client
settlements
on
certain
projects,
partly
offset
by
lower
net
COVID-19
costs.
Adjusted
EBITDA
for
Renewables
was
$4
million,
down
from
$12
million
in
2020 due
to
charges
in
Taiwan
resulting
from
operational
delays,
partly
offset
by
good
progress
on
Seagreen.
After
depreciation
and
amortization,
full-year
net
operating
income
for
Subsea
and
Conventional
was
$103
million,
compared
to
$48
million
in
the
prior-year
quarter,
excluding
$294
million
of
impairment
charges,
mainly
related
to
vessels.
Renewables
recognized
a
net
operating
loss
of
$60
million,
compared
with
a
loss
of
$40
million
in
the
prior
year.
Slide
8
shows
a
summarized
income
statement.
The
group's
fourth
quarter
revenue
was
$1.4
billion,
45%
higher
than
the
prior-year
period.
Adjusted
EBITDA
of
$143
million
was
down
from
$165
million
last
year.
This
resulted
in
an
adjusted
EBITDA
margin of
10%, about 600 basis
points lower than the margin achieved in the
prior-year quarter
due
to the
phasing
of
project
in
their early
stages,
some
downtime
from
weather,
and
charges
relating
to
projects
in
Taiwan.
The
prior-year
fourth
quarter
benefited
from
the
release
of
restructuring
provisions
of $14
million.
Coming
to
the
full
year,
revenue
in
2021 was
$5
billion,
up
45%
year-on-year.
Adjusted
EBITDA
was
$521
million,
up
from
$347
million
in 2020.
The
improvement
included
the
reversal
of
restructuring
charges
of
$37
million
in
2021,
compared
to
a
charge
of
$86
million
in
2020.
Net
COVID-19
costs
of
$27
million
in
2021 were
lower
compared
to
$70
million
incurred in
2020.
Adjusted
EBITDA
margin
was
10.4%,
slightly
up
from
9.7%
in
2020,
while
the
underlying
margin
reflected
the
execution
of projects
awarded
during
the
downtime,
as
well
to
the
phasing
of
certain
projects
in
their
early
stages,
and
charges
related
to
delays
on
projects
in
Taiwan.
In
2021,
net
income
benefited
from
the
absence
of
asset
impairment
charges
on
goodwill,
property,
plant
and
equipment,
and
right
of
use
assets,
but
reflect
the
COVID-19
induced
deterioration
in
the
outlook
for
oil
and
gas
markets.
Overall,
net
income
for
2021
was
$46
million,
compared
with
a
net
loss
of
$1.1
billion
in
the
prior
year.
Turning
to
slide
9
for
supplementary
details
of
the
income
statement,
administrative
expenses
in
the
fourth
quarter
improved $10
million
year-on-year,
driven
by
impairment
reversals
of
$4
million,
compared
to
$14
million
impairment
charge
in
2020,
partly
offset
by
the
addition
of
administrative
expenses
related
to
the
combination
with
OHT.
Fourth
quarter
depreciation
and
amortization
increased
slightly
to
$112
million
(sic) [$113 million] (00:12:03) from
$105
million,
mostly
due
to
the
addition
of
OHT's
five
heavy
transportation
vessels
to
be
active
fleet
from
the 1st
of
October.
Net
finance
cost
fell by
$3
million,
mainly
due
to
low
charges
related
to
lease
liabilities,
while
taxation
was
$16
million,
representing
an
ETR
of
81%,
elevated
by
a
mix
of
profits
in
certain
jurisdictions
and
irrecoverable
withholding
taxes.
Moving
to
the
full
year,
administration
expenses
were
$228
million,
down
$14
million
year-on-year,
benefiting
from
an
impairment
reversal
of
$4 million
in
2021,
compared
to
charges
of
$18
million
in
2020, and
credit
related
to
restructuring
of
$3
million
in
2021,
compared
to
charges
of
$11
million
in
2020.
Depreciation
and
amortization
was
$444
million
in
2021,
up
$2
million
year-on-year,
and
included
the
OHT
vessels
in
the
fourth
quarter.
Net
finance
costs
were
$15
million
in
2021,
down
$5
million
year-on-year,
mainly
due
to
[ph]
work (00:13:23) charges
related
to
lease
liabilities.
Taxation
of
$64
million,
equating
to
an
effective
tax
rate
of
64%,
was
driven
by
the
mix
of
profits
in
certain
jurisdictions
and
irrecoverable
withholding
taxes.
On
slide
10,
we
developed our
cost
histogram
that
shows our costs
segmented
into
four
categories.
In 2020,
we
saw
the impact
of the
cost
reduction
plan
as
we
realigned
our
business
in
response
to
the
COVID-19
pandemic
and
associated
global
economic
slowdown.
But
costs
have
increased
in 2021 in line with
the
industry
recovery.
Direct
project
costs
are
a
function
of the
volume,
mix,
and
phasing
of
our
activities
and
the
pricing
environment
for
procurement.
In
2021,
we
saw
a
significant
increase
in
our
procurement
costs,
driven
by
the
mix
in
phasing
of
our
project
portfolio,
particularly
our
largest
EPCI projects
for
example,
Sakarya,
Bacalhau
and
Seagreen.
Our
personnel
costs
increased
approximately
$1.1
billion
in
2021,
as
we
expanded
our
tendering
and
engineering
teams
to
address
the
sharp
uptick
in
industry
activity.
Personnel
costs
also
include
the
extra
[ph]
gross
cost
incurred
(00:14:42) relating
to
COVID-19.
Such
costs
include
the
need
to
have
standby
crews
and
the
quarantining
of
crews
in
accordance
with
local
regulations.
Vessel
and
other costs
increased
approximately
$400 million.
We
ended
the
year
with
34
vessels
in
their
active
fleet,
up
from
30 at
the
end
of
2020,
with
the
addition
of five
heavy
transportation
vessels
from
OHT,
partially
offset
by
the
recycling
of
17.
Slide
11
shows
our
cash
flow
waterfall
for
the
full
year.
Net
cash
generated
from
operating
activities
was
$293
million,
including
a
$202
million
build
in working
capital.
The
latter
was
driven
by
the
timing
of
milestone
payments
and
working
capital
requirements
associated
with projects
in
the
Middle
East
and
delays
in
payment
in
Taiwan.
Capital
expenditure
was
$167
million,
[indiscernible]
(00:15:42) depreciation
and amortization
of
$444
million,
reflecting
the absence
of
new
build
vessels
in
the
year.
During
the
year,
we
incurred
$93
million
in
lease
payments,
mainly
related
to
chartered
vessels
and
$93
million
relating
to
dividend
payments
and
share
repurchases.
In
the
fourth
quarter,
we
drew
down
$200 million
from
the
group's
UK
Export
Finance
facility
in
advance
of
the
anticipated
working
capital
build
in
2022.
At
the
end
of
the
year,
we
have
$598
million
in
cash
and
cash
equivalents
and
moved
to
a
net
debt
position
of $55
million
including
lease
liabilities
compared
to
a
net
cash
position
of
$44 million
including
lease
liabilities
at
the
end
of 2020.
The
group's
liquidity
was
$1.6
billion,
which
included
$956
million
of
undrawn
borrowing
facilities.
To
conclude,
slide
12
shows
our
guidance
for
the
full-year.
Before
I
comment
on
the
full-year,
I
want
to
highlight
that
the
first
quarter
has
a
heavy planned
vessel
management
schedule
with
10
vessels
undertaking
dry-docking,
modifications
or
maintenance.
Vessels
in
addition
to
the
Northern
Hemisphere
weather
seasonality
normally
experienced
during
the
quarter
that
results
in
lower
activity.
Quarter
one
adjusted
EBITDA
will
be
lower
than
prior
comparative
periods.
However,
full year
adjusted
EBITDA
is
expected
to
be
in
line
with
or
better
than
last
year. When
coming
to
the
full
year,
revenues
expected
to
be
broadly
in
line
with
2021
while
adjusted
EBITDA
as
mentioned
a
moment
ago
and
net
operating
income
are
expected
to
be
in
line
with
or
better
than
last
year.
Our
administrative
expenses
are
expected
to
be
in
the
region
of
$240
million
and
$260
million. Depreciation
and
amortization
expense
is
expected
to
be
between
$460
million
and
$480
million,
while
net
finance
costs
are
expected
to
be
between
$20 million
and
$25
million.
Taxation
for
the
year
is
anticipated
to
be
in
the
range
of
$35
million
to
$45
million.
As
we
announced
last
quarter,
our
capital
expenditure
in
2022
is
expected
to
fall
within
the
range
of
$420
million
to
$440
million,
inclusive
of
approximately
$280
million
relating
to
Seaway
7's
new
build
vessel
program.
I
will
now
pass
you
back
to
John.
Thank
you,
Mark.
On
slide
13,
we
have
a
summary
of
our
strategy
comprising
the
subsea
field
of
the
future
and
the
proactive
participation
in
the
energy
transition.
In
the
next
two
slides,
I'll
do
a
recap
of
our
successes
this
year
before
turning
to
our
strategy
for
capital
allocation.
Our
strategy
for
the
subsea
field
of
the
future
revolves
around
four
focus
areas,
early
engagement,
system
innovation,
our
integrated
offering
and
digital
delivery.
Early
engagement has
become
a
cornerstone
of
our
relationships
with
clients,
allowing
us
to
work
closely
with
them
to
help
optimize
their
field
developments
and
has
been
particularly
important
as
supply
chains
have
tightened.
Our
engineers
and
supply
chain
management
teams
work
with
our
clients
to
navigate
bottlenecks
to
ensure
they
get
access
to
the
right
capacity
at
the
right
time.
About
60%
of
our SURF
EPCI
contracts
awarded
in
2021
follow
early
engagement,
and
7 out
of
10
awards
in
Norway
were
the
result
of
working
in
close
partnerships
with
our
clients.
2021
was
a
significant
year
for
innovation
in
Subsea
7.
Our
state-of-the-art
pipelay
vessel,
Seven
Vega,
joined
the
fleet
and
has
been
key
to
our
delivery
of
our
Electrical
Heat Traced
Flowlines (sic) [Electrically Heat Traced Flowlines] (00:19:53).
With
enhanced
flow
assurance,
EHTF
allows
longer
tiebacks
as
well
as
reducing
the
carbon
footprint
of
satellite
developments.
Moving
to
integrated
SPS and
SURF,
and
our
subsea
integration
alliance
with
One
Subsea.
We
offer
our
clients
one
interface
of
a
streamlined
service
from
design
to
commissioning
of
entire
subsea
developments.
The
feedback
from
our
clients
has
been
excellent
and
the
numbers
speak
for
themselves
with
a
76%
share
of
integrated
rewards
by
revenue
since
January
2020.
The
integrated
offering
is
gaining
popularity
with
our
clients.
And
in
2021, 62%
of
our
SURF
awards
were
integrated.
Finally,
we
are
rolling
out
digital
strategies
across
several
aspects
of
our
business,
delivering
an
improved
performance
for
our
teams
and
enhanced
experience
for
our
clients.
A
good
example
of this
has
been
the
launch
and
rollout
in
2021
of
4insight,
which
uses
big
data
and
machine
learning
to
improve
the
uptime
of
our
vessels.
Moving
to
slide
14
and
our
strategy
of
proactive
participation
in
the
energy
transition.
The
renewables
piece
of
this
strategy
is
probably
well
known
to
you
by
now
with
the
creation
of
Seaway
7 ASA,
as
well
as
our
participation
in
the
Salamander
floating
wind
joint
venture,
an
investment
in
Nautilus
Floating
Solutions.
Floating
wind
is
gaining
momentum
with
several
demonstrative
projects
underway
and
being
tendered.
Other
exciting
markets
are
carbon
capture
and
hydrogen.
We
won
our
first
carbon
capture
award
for
Equinor's
Northern
Lights
project
in
2021,
and
we
are
bidding
for
further
projects
that
we'll
highlight
in
a
moment.
Our
hydrogen
strategy
is
at
an
earlier
stage,
and
we
gained
valuable
insight
from
our
subsidiary,
Xodus,
which
has
worked
on
over
30 hydrogen
studies,
as
well
as
over
30
carbon
capture
studies. Of
course,
as
well
as
embracing
new
energy
markets,
a
very
important
part
of
our
energy
transition
journey
is
helping
to
reduce
the
carbon
emissions
of
clients'
oil
and
gas
projects,
as
well
as
reducing
the
emissions
of
our
own
fleet.
In
2021,
our
Carbon
Estimator
tool
is
now
incorporated
into
all
our
studies.
It
allows
our
clients
to
estimate
the
carbon
emissions
from
different
permutations
of
field
layouts
and
helps
them
optimize
their
developments.
And the
Carbon
Estimator
was
used
to
optimize
64%
of
contracts
awarded
to
us
during
this
year.
Finally
but perhaps
most
significantly,
in
2021,
we
aligned
the
goals
of
the
UN
Paris
Agreement
to
target
net
zero
by
2050
with
a
reduction
of
50%
in
our
Scope
1
and
Scope
2
emissions
by
2035.
Our
vessels
account
for
over
90%
of
our
Scope
1
and
Scope
2
emissions,
and
we
aim
to
reduce
their
carbon
footprint
through
a
combination
of
hydrolization,
shore
power,
clean
fuels
and
digital
efficiency.
We
will
report
on
our
progress
in
our
sustainability
report
for
2021,
which
we will
publish
in
mid-March.
Wrapping
up
the
strategy
section,
let's turn
to
slide
16,
where
we
clarified
questions
about
capital
allocation
that
we've
heard
often
from
investors
and
analysts
over
the
past
months.
What
we
have here
is
a
simple
schematic
to
highlight
on
one
hand
use
of
cash
from
Subsea
and
Conventional,
and
on
the
other
hand,
the
funding
strategy,
the
Seaway
7.
Our
Subsea and
Conventional
business
units
has
a
young
fleet
of
vessels
that
will
capture
opportunities
in
the
rising
oil
and
gas
market
was
requiring
reduced
levels
of
capital
investment.
With
a
solid
industry
outlook,
stable
competitive
landscape,
and
investment
well
below
D&A,
this
business
is
well
positioned
to
generate
significant
free
cash
flow.
The
priority
for
this
cash
flow
will
be
shareholder
returns
starting
as
we
announced
today
with
a
regular
dividend.
The
mechanism
and
magnitude
of
additional
cash
returns
will
be
left
to
the
discretion
of
the
board
and
assessed
annually,
but
this
year
includes
a
$70
million
share
repurchase.
On
the
right-hand
side,
we
have
Seaway
7,
which
we
currently
have
72%
stake.
And
it
is
our
intention
to
always
hold
at
least
51%
stake.
Seaway
7
is,
as
you
know,
focused
on
the
high
growth
fixed
offshore
wind
market
and
has
two
new
vessels
under
construction,
which
are
due
for
delivery
in
2023.
It's
Seaway
7's
intention
to
fund
these
and
any
future
new
builds
independently
of
Subsea
7.
Of
course,
Seaway
7's
debt
will
be
fully
consolidated
on
Subsea
7's
balance
sheet.
I
hope
the
slide
illustrates
our
intention
to
keep
a
relatively
separate
underlying
structure.
[indiscernible]
(00:25:21)
working
capital
support
from
Subsea
7
may
provide
to
Seaway
7
whilst
it
establishes
itself
with
an
independent
capital
structure.
And
with
that,
back
to
our
usual
outlook
slides
starting
with
the
prospects
for
subsea
market
on
slide
17.
We
were
very
pleased
with
our
strong
order
intake
we
reported
for
2021
and
indicative
of
the
recovery
that's
underway
in
the
oil
and
gas
industry.
Tendering
remains
very
active,
and
we
are
optimistic
that
2022
will
be
another
very
good
year
for
new
awards.
At
the
core
of
this
recovery,
the
most
active
markets
remain
Brazil,
where
we
have a
long
list
of
prospects
for
both
Petrobras
and
IOCs,
the
Gulf
of
Mexico
with
multiple
tie-back
projects
in
the
tendering
pipeline.
And
Norway,
with
the
tax
incentives,
should
lead
to
a
high
level
of
awards
this
year.
We
see
pockets
of
improving
activity
outside
these
regions.
There
are
a
handful
of projects
in
West
Africa
that
are
pushing
ahead.
Bidding
in
Saudi
Arabia
remains
active.
And
we're
now
working
on
the
tender
for
Sakarya
Phase
2
Turkey,
the
follow
up to
$1
billion
Phase
1
project.
In
2022, we
also
expect
to
see
further
carbon
capture
awards
as
capital
allocated
to
this
emerging
market
by
our
clients
begins
to
accelerate.
The
first
such
project
we
will
bid
are
in
the
UK
for
the
Northern
Endurance
Partnership
in
Humber
site
and
Teesside.
Endurance
field
will
act
as
a
CO2
store,
lies
approximately
100
kilometers
offshore
from
the
Humber,
and
we
expect
an
award
to
the
market
in
2022.
Overall,
we
are
encouraged
by
the
way
the
recovery
is
progressing
and
remain
confident
in
the
outlook
for
Subsea
and
Conventional.
On
the
next
slide,
we
have
the
wind
prospects. I'll
leave
these
and
the
detail
to Seaway 7
to
discuss,
but
we
continue
to
see
strong
demand
centered
on
the
US
and
the
UK,
with
awards
expected to
the
industry this
year
and
onwards. We're
also expected to
bid
two
floating
wind demonstrator
projects
in Korea
during
2022.
So, to
wrap
up,
we'll
turn
to
our
final
slide
on
page
19. While
it's
true
to
say
that
some
of
the
challenges
of
COVID-19
continued
to
affect
2021,
it
was
a
year
of
strong
recovery
for
Subsea
7
that
leaves
us
very
well-positioned
to
deliver
as
the
cycle
develops.
This
is
the
view
that
is
shared
by
the
board
and
underpins
their
decision
to
introduce
a
regular
dividend.
For
the
Subsea
and
Conventional
business,
we
have already
seen
order
intake
reach
the
highest
levels
we've
seen
for
several
years
and
tendering
remains
very
active.
In
Renewables,
after
a
hiatus
in
awards
in
the
UK
offshore
wind
market,
the CFD
round
in
the
first
half of
this
year
should
unlock
opportunities
whilst
in
the
US,
some
large
projects
are
scheduled
for award
to
the
industry
this
year.
Of
course,
as
we've
heard
from
companies
around
the
globe,
raw
material
exposure
and
supply
chain
management
becomes
critical.
Whilst
no
one
can
be
totally
immune,
we
believe
we
have measures
in
place
to
mitigate
these
risks
as
much
as
possible.
Finally,
the
emerging
energy
markets
that
support
the
long-term
outlook
for
Subsea
7
are
gathering
momentum,
with
demonstration
projects
in
floating
wind
and
tenders
for
carbon
capture
projects.
Overall,
we
believe Subsea
7
is
well-placed
to
capture
opportunities
in
today's
evolving
and
dynamic
energy
markets.
With
that,
we'll
be
happy
to
take
your
questions.
Thank
you.
[Operator Instructions]
We
have
the
first
questions
coming
from
the
line
of
Sasikanth
Chilukuru
from
Morgan
Stanley.
Please
ask
your
question.
Hi.
Thanks
for
taking
my
questions.
I
had
three,
please.
The
first
one
was,
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
provide
some
more
color
on
how
the tendering
activity
has
improved
in
recent
weeks,
especially
in
the
Subsea
and
the
Conventional
business,
how
the
discussions
with
clients
have
changed
over
the
course of
this
year
so
far.
And
how
confident
are
you
in
improving
your
order
intake in
2022
relative
to
2021?
The
second
one
was
related
to
the
offshore
wind
project,
the
Formosa
2
project.
You've
highlighted
you have
retained
the
costs
recognized
for
the
Taiwan
offshore
wind
project
within
Subsea
7,
I
suppose
this
is
the
Formosa
2
project.
Can
you
update
– can
you
give
us an
update
on
how
the
project
is
progressing,
what
contingencies
you
have
included
in
your
2022
EBITDA
guidance
related
to
this
project?
And
previously,
you
have
highlighted
that
you
are
in
discussions
to
recover
the
incremental
costs
from
the
clients
in
accordance
to
your
contractual
terms.
How
are
these
discussions
progressing?
And
finally,
if
you
can
give
us
a
guidance
or
color
on
the
expectations
of
working
capital
in
2022.
Last
quarter,
it
was
highlighted
that
there
will
be
a
working
capital
build
in
2022.
Is
it
still
the
case?
And
if
you
can
guide
us
on
the
expected
magnitude
of
the
potential
working
capital
outlook.
Thanks.
It
sounded
like more
than
three
questions
there,
but
I'll
try
to
answer
them
as best
I
can,
but
good
to
talk
to
you
again.
So, as
I've
mentioned
in
my
prepared
remarks,
we
are
certainly
seeing
a
lot
of
activity
and
a
lot
of
tendering
moving.
We
are
very
much
in
a
place
where
we
are
seeing
improvements
in
terms
of
pricing
on
every
tender
that
we
submit.
We
know that
we
are
very
well-placed
for
quite
a
large
portfolio
of
projects
in
Norway
to
come
our
way
this
year.
And
those
discussions
and
clarifications
are
moving
ahead,
as
well
as
certain
bids
to
the
market
that
Equinor
will
do
in
the
first
half of
this
year.
As
I
mentioned in
my
prepared
remarks,
we're
working
on
the
second
phase
of
Sakarya
so
that
our
client
is
accelerating
the
next
phase
of
Sakarya
moving
ahead,
and
there's
no
let-up
in
Petrobras'
bidding
process.
You'll
have
seen
that
BĂşzios
8
was
publicly
bid,
only
two
was
bidded, and
Subsea
7
is
the
lowest
bidder
on
the
public
opening
on
that.
So
we're
seeing
a
number
of
factors
happening,
limited
number
of
people
bidding
tenders,
a
speeding
up
of
the
number
of
tenders
that
are
happening
there.
So
having
the
largest
fleet
in
this
industry
is
really,
really
helping
us
at
the
moment,
because
it
allows
us
to
be
very
clear
about
where
we
want
to
place
our
assets.
I've
talked
about
this
in
previous
quarters.
Our
aim
was
to
have
one
of
the big
pipelayers
down
in
Australia
and
Barossa
and
Scarborough
coming
together
in
the end
of
the
first
quarter
helps
us
there.
In
Brazil,
we
wanted
to have
one
of
the big
pipelayers
in
future
years
and
then Bacalhau, Mero-3, and
hopefully
BĂşzios
8
fits
that.
And
lastly
then,
we
will
have
one
big
pipelay
work in
between
Norway
and
the
Gulf
of
Mexico,
and
lastly
then,
one
of
the
pipelayers
in
Africa
and
the
Middle
East.
And
again,
we
can
see
those
pieces
or
those
jigsaws
fitting
together.
So,
main
message
is
it's
speeding
up.
The
main
message
is,
is
that
we're
very
well-positioned.
And
we
get
many
questions
why
having
the
largest
fleet
in
the
world
or
having
the largest
fleet
in
the
world
helps
you when
the
market is
quite
strong.
Your
second
question
on
Formosa
2,
Formosa
2,
because
we
were
in
the
middle
of
a
very
complex
situation
in
2021
in
Taiwan,
Subsea
7
retained
the
economic
interest
of
that
asset
and
that
project
at
the
time.
We
have
since
clarified
our
remaining
scope,
our
remaining
remuneration,
and
our
remaining
schedule
with
our
client.
And
we
expect
to
close
that
project
physically
hopefully
by
the
end
of
Q2
2022.
We
are
going
back
to
work
this
week,
as
we
speak,
with
the
remaining
scope
that
we've
got.
We
did
incur
though
some
further
increased
cost
in
the
supply
chain,
because
you
have
this
entire
wave
of
projects
that
were
held
up
in
2021
that
are
now
on
top
of
a
bunch
of
projects
that
were
also
to
be
done
in
2022.
We
have
now
secured
all
our third-party
assets
that
we
need
in
Taiwan
for
this
year,
and
that
adjustment
was
taken
in
quarter
four.
So
we
expect
to
be
able
to
give
you
an
update
on
how
the
project
goes
during
the
year,
but
we
expect
to
be
materially
complete
by
the
middle
of 2022.
And
on
working
capital,
Mark
can
give
you
an
update.
Yes.
Thank
you,
Sasikanth.
Working
capital
improved
by
around
$100
million
in
Q4.
We
communicated
in
our
Q3
earnings
call
that we
expected
a
improvement
in
quarter
four,
which
indeed
materialized.
However,
we
do
still
expect
a
working
capital
build
in
2022
due
to
the
increased
procurement
activity
of
Mero-3
in
Brazil,
together
with
the
significant
activity
that
we
have
planned
for
the
Middle
East.
So
we
reiterate
our
guidance
provided
in
November
about
the
working
capital
build
in 2022
will
be
in
the
low
to
mid $100
million.
What
I
would
say
is
that
we
are
actively
working
on
this
area.
And
to
give
an
example,
in
January,
I
and
[ph]
others (00:35:33)
had
a
very
constructive
call
with
the
Petrobras
CFO.
We
had
lobbied
Petrobras
very
hard
to
seek
improvements
regarding
working
capital
requirements.
As
ever
with
Petrobras,
it
was
a
very
constructive
conversation.
And
what I
would
say
is
we are
pleased
with
the
changes
that
Petrobras
made
in
the
most
recent
tender
on BĂşzios
8
elsewhere,
optimizing
cash
management
as
a
focus,
as
I
said
some
moments
ago.
So
again,
our
guidance
remains
the
same
as
we
communicated
in
November
regarding
2022
for
working
capital.
Great.
Thank
you.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
Haakon
Amundsen
from
ABG
Sundal
Collier.
Please
ask
your
question.
Yeah.
Hi,
guys.
Thanks
for
taking
my
question.
Just
a
question
on
the
Subsea
and
Conventional
margin
development.
I
don't know
if
you want
to guide specifically,
but
could
you
give
some
color
on
the
movement
into
2022
and
2023
relative
to
2021,
please?
Well,
what
I
discussed
before,
Haakon,
on
margins
is
we
expect
to
see
from middle
of
2023
onwards,
the
benefits
of
newer
projects
coming
into
the
mix
when
we
physically
go
offshore.
So,
that
position
is
certainly
starting
to
fit
together
with
the work
that
we
bought in,
in
Q4
and
what
we
expect
to
bring
in
this
year.
As
we
guided
in
our
press
release
and
our
comments,
we
expect
to
see
2022
EBITDA
to
be
in
line
or
better
than
2021.
So,
for
us,
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
give
better
clarity
to
the
market
as
to
how
and
we
see
things
moving.
As
Mark
touched
on,
we
have
a
large
number
of
vessels
on
the
dock
in
repair
in
quarter
one.
So,
I
will
see
that
as
the
year
develops,
we
can
certainly
give
the
market
more
clarity.
But
directionally,
it's
improving
and
we're
seeing
that
on
the
pricing
that
we're
seeing.
And
linked
to
what
Mark has
just
said,
on
BĂşzios
8,
the
working
capital
is
substantially
better
than
Mero-3.
So,
we're
seeing
two
things
happening
here.
We're
seeing
our
margin
improve
for
our
outer
year
projects,
and
we're
seeing
the
entry
ticket
in
certain
locations
such
as
Brazil
improve
as
well.
All
right.
That's
helpful.
Just
to
understand
your
guidance
for
– because
when
you
guide
for
potentially
improving
EBITDA
in
2022,
of
course,
that's
the
consolidated
numbers.
And
I
guess
Seaway
7
appears
to
be
expanding
its
EBITDA.
So, I
just
wondered
if
you
could
give us
some
color
on –
is
the –
should we
expect
the
Subsea
EBITDA
to
expand
as
well?
Or
is
it
just
the
consolidated
number
and
the
Seaway
7
number
that
we
should
expect
to
improve?
Thanks.
Yeah.
I
think for
us,
what
we
guided
with
Seaway
7
should
be
this
year,
which
is
a
$1
billion
business
and
heading
towards
its
10%
EBITDA,
and
we
can
hopefully
see
the
piece
of
that
coming
together
this
year.
We
do
need
to
remember
that
2022
offshore
is
a
relatively
quiet
year
for
us,
because
very
few
projects
were
awarded
to
the
market
in
2020.
We've
adjusted
the
size
of
the
fleet.
And
as
Mark
has
discussed,
we
have
a
large
volume
of
low
margin
procurement
on
all
these
future
projects
for
2024
and
2025
going
through
the
books.
So,
the
mix
is
changing,
but
directionally,
Haakon,
we're
very
comfortable
with
which
way
this
is
all
heading.
All
right.
Thank
you.
That's
it
for
me.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
James
Thompson
from
JPMorgan.
Please
ask
your
question.
Great.
Thanks
very
much. Good
afternoon,
gents.
Just
a
follow-up
there
on
Brazil,
John,
I
mean,
you
said
that BĂşzios
8
[indiscernible]
(00:39:36)
improved,
something
you
talked
about
last
quarter
looking
for
that.
Do you
think
that's
a
sort
of
permanent
adjustment
that
Petrobras
is
making
or
is
this
something
that's
kind
of
very
specific
to
the
wants
and
needs
of
this
particular
project?
I
hope
direction
is
heading
the
right
way.
We
only
had
two
bids
on
that
opportunity.
And
as
the
market
starts
to
tighten
up,
I
think
they're
acutely
aware
that
they
have
used
the
cycle
to
get
some
better
working
capital
in –
on
previous
bids,
which
all
the
main
players
were
taking
at
the
time,
but
I
think
all
of us
are
pretty
clear
now
in
the
market
that
we
should
see
some
improved
working
capital
there.
So,
I
believe
that
certainly
the
message
that
Mark
and
I
gave to
the
executive
members
that
we
discussed
is
that
BĂşzios
8 needs to improve
but
your
remaining
list
of
projects
also
need
to
improve.
This
was
a
temporary
move
that
Petrobras
was
quite
smart
in
taking
the
downturn
in
the
market
to
achieve,
but
we
should
hope
to
see.
Each
bid
comes
along.
The
Petrobras
system
is
very
open.
You
can
send
as
many
questions
in
as
you
want
on
each
bid.
And
we
have
been
banging
the
drum
for
a
number
of
quarters
about
the
very,
very
important
side
of
making
sure
that
the
working
capital
was
there
and
proportionate
for
the
risks
that
we
take.
Okay.
Okay.
That's
helpful.
I
mean
more
of
a
general
question.
I
mean,
just
COVID
obviously
a
big
impact
last
year.
Can
you
talk
maybe
about
the
sort
of
changes?
Is
it
– do
you
feel
like
operations
are
going to
be
just
a
lot
easier
now
this
year
in
general?
I
think
if
we
keep
COVID
very
simple,
2020
was
the
entire
world
that
exactly
the
same
thing,
all the
world
around.
Our
crews
who
are
effectively
mariners
were
free
to
move
around
the
world
on
seaman's
tickets
and
that
– it
was
a
very
difficult
year,
but
logistically
simpler.
2021
is
depended
on
the
color
of
your
passport
and
which
countries
had
vaccinated
and
which
countries
hadn't.
So
2021
was
an
exceptionally
complex
set
of
nationality
mixes
that
we
have
on
our
vessels
and
how
we
did
that.
This
year,
we're
actually
seeing
in
places
like
Taiwan
and
Brazil
a
slightly
different
problem.
Although
crews
are
fully
vaccinated
and
very
healthy
and
no
major
issues
on
our
vessels,
but
we
still
have
some
regulations
that
were
put
in
place,
quite
rightly
18 months
ago,
that
say
if
you
have
a
single
case
of
COVID
on
your
vessels,
then
you
need
to
change
the
entire
crew
out.
So,
it's
that
sort
of
lag
between
regulation
and
medical
risk
in
reality.
That
is
one
of
the
challenges
our
industry
is
facing
at
the
moment,
but
I
expect
to
see
that
normalize
as
time
moves
on.
Okay.
Thanks.
Just
two, I guess,
small
questions at first.
So
maybe
one
is,
just
in
terms
of
the
sort of
Renewables
pace,
I
mean,
just
wondered
if
you
could
talk a
little
bit
about
2023.
I
mean,
in
terms
of
the
bids
that
are
coming
out for
this
year,
is
there
much
that
can
sort
of
fill in
from
a
revenue
perspective
or
are
you expecting
a
pretty
significant
drop
in
revenues
in
2023?
And
then,
just
in
terms
of
your
other
projects
that
are
ongoing,
I
just wondered
if
you
can
give
us
an
update
on
the
Sangomar
projects,
actually,
don't
hear
that
much
about
it.
Okay.
Renewables,
as
I've
touched a
little
bit
in
my
prepared
remarks,
James,
the
biggest
market
in
renewables
is
the
UK
sector.
The
UK
government,
for
political
reasons,
decided
to
delay
the
Contracts
for Difference
auction
rounds
by
a
year.
So
a
large
group
of
UK
projects
that
are
on
the
diagram
were
delayed
by
a
year,
but
we
do
expect
them
to
be
awarded
by
the
middle
of
this
year
in
the
market.
But
what
that
means
is,
physically,
offshore
next
year,
it'll
be
a
quieter
market
than
we
expect.
So,
we
do
expect
probably
the
revenue
in
the
Renewables
business
to
go
down
next
year.
So
– but,
equally,
we
do
expect
that
the
Seaway
7's
share
of
some
of those
UK
projects
and
awards, the
market
should
be
reasonably
strong.
As
the
Seagreen
1A
is
mentioned,
which
is
the
extension
to
the
current
project
that
we're
working
on,
and
we
expect
that
one
to
have
its
CFD
awarded
in
the
middle
of
this
year,
and
we're
bidding
a
number
of
those
other
projects
there.
So,
we'd
expect
Seaway
7
to
get
its
fair
share
of
work
on
those.
But,
most
of
those,
with the
exception
of
Seagreen
1A,
are
T&I
projects,
which
will
cut
in
in
2024
onwards.
We
expect
the
US
projects
to
continue
to
be
awarded
to
the
market,
but
most
of
those,
again,
are
transport
and
install
for
2024
onwards.
If
we
come
back to
Sangomar,
Sangomar
is
a
project
that
goes
offshore
and
that's
literally
as
we
speak.
We
have
vessels
working
in
Senegal
at
the
moment
in
the
preparation
work,
and
we
expect
the
pipe-laying
to
take
place
as
planned
in
quarter
two
this
year.
So,
Sangomar
is
trucking
along
in the
background
and,
James,
a
big
project
and then,
hopefully,
we
can
give
the
market
more
updates
in
Q3
and
Q4
as
we
liquidate
the
bulk
of
the
work
in
Q2
and in
Q3.
Okay.
Great.
Thank
you,
James.
Thanks
very much.
I'll
pass –
I'll pass
it
over.
Thank
you.
And
we
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
Mick
Pickup
from
Barclays.
Please
ask
your
question.
Yeah.
Hi.
Good
afternoon,
everybody.
Obviously,
good
to
hear
that
you're
making
progress
on the
working
cap
and the
project
terms and
conditions.
I'm
just
wondering
if
you're
getting
to
that
point
yet
where,
you
think, that
you
can
start
increasing
your
gross
margin
expectations
on
projects
and
whether
you
think
the
future
will
enable
you
to
be
selective
and
start
drop
– not
bid
into
contracts
yourself
on
some
of
these
projects
that
come
in?
Thanks,
Mick.
Great
question,
as
always.
For
us,
we
run
the
business
with
a
job
level
income
on
each
of
our
projects,
and
that
is
improving
and
increasing.
But
the
other
side
of
good
– very
good
profitability
in
this
industry
is
all the
recovery
in
the
vessel
fleet
and
the
vessel
asset
base.
We
set
our
recoveries
across
a
normalized
number
of
days
per
year
recovery
on
each
asset.
And
that's why
I
mentioned
the
sort
of
tactical
planning
about
where
we
deploy
our
assets
because
we've
talked
to
this
group
over
the
downturn
of
the
inefficiencies
of
moving
pipelay ships
from
Australia
to
the
Norway
to
Brazil
where
you
spend
100 days
a
year
transiting.
So,
for
us,
it's
the
two
sides
of
that equation
that
will
really
start
to
move
the
EBITDA
margin
for
this
business.
And
I
expect
from
mid-2023
to
really
start
to see
the
benefits
of
not
only
improved
job level
income
in
the
projects
cutting
through,
but
the
asset
deployment,
allowing
us
to
get
quite
high
utilizations
on
the
key
assets
per
day.
So,
that's
the
way
I
think
we
will
see
the
market
move
for
us,
and
it's
a
sort
of
classic
combination
of two
things
coming
together.
And
that's why
our
approach
of
targeting
certain
projects
in
Brazil,
certain
projects
in
Norway,
certain
projects in
Gulf
of
Mexico,
and
certain
projects
in
Australia
should
hopefully
– the
markets
to
see
all
that
fit
together
as
time
moves
on.
So,
directionally,
we
hope
to
see
that
happening,
and
we
see
the
same
hopefully
coming
in
with
the
Alfa
Lift
in
due
course
coming
in
in
2023
in
the
renewables.
So,
we
don't
have
to
keep
moving
crane
vessels
around
the
world
and
such
like
to
do
so.
So,
all
together,
we
should
be able
to see
that
coming
into
fruition,
hopefully,
from
mid-2023
onwards, Mick.
Okay.
And
can
I
just
follow
up?
You've obviously
talked
a
lot
about
Brazil.
You've
talked
about
Norway
later in
the year.
You
mentioned
West
Africa
in
passing.
Clearly,
somewhere,
it's
been
important
to you
over
the
years.
Where
exactly
are
we
seeing
West
Africa?
Well,
I
think we've
seen
two
things
in
West
Africa.
We've
seen
Angola
pick
up.
And
we're
bidding
some
work
in
Angola,
and
we would
expect
to
get
our
share.
There's
about
three
projects
there,
so
we'd
like
to
get
one
of
those
over
the
line
in
the
next
few
months.
So,
for
us,
Angola
is
definitely
picking
up.
As
you
know,
we're
the
preferred
bidder
on
Pecan,
so
there's
work
there
with
Aker
Energy
to
try
to
see
if we
can
get
the
stars
to
align
in
that
part
of
the
world
to
get
that
Pecan
project
over
the
line
as
well.
And
we're
seeing
other
areas
such
as
the
next
phases
of
Senegal
and
others
potentially
coming
to
the
market
in
due
course.
So,
West
Africa
doesn't
have
the
momentum
and
the
speed
that
we
had
in
the
past.
But
the
important
thing,
it's
waking
up
and
starting
to
move.
Okay.
Thank
you very
much.
Cheers.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
Lukas
Daul
from
Arctic
Securities.
Please
limit
your
question
to
one.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Good
afternoon.
I
was
wondering
about
your
order
intake
in
the
fourth
quarter.
There
was
a
decent
amount
of
unannounced
orders.
Is
that
something
that
was
exceptional
this
quarter
or
is
it
something
you
anticipate
going
forward
as
well?
And
then
the
escalations
that
you
have
seen,
could
you
sort
of
talk a
little
bit
more
about
them,
what
is
driving
them
and
what
sort of
contributed
to
the
size
of
those
to
$400 million?
Yes.
So,
Lukas, thanks
for your
question.
Escalations
come
to
us
in
a
number
of
different
ways.
First
one,
all
our
contracts
in
Brazil
have
an
annual
escalation
mechanism
because
of
the
underlying
inflation
in
Brazil.
So
Petrobras
contracts
have
it,
our
international
oil
company
contracts
in
Brazil
have
it.
So
they
generally
cut
in,
and
they
have
come
into
play
in
this
quarter.
We
also
have
different
settlements
with
clients,
durational
settlements
with
clients
that
then
go
through
our
lines
in
both
revenue
and
job
level
income,
in
terms
of
how
we
do
that.
So
it's
really
about
us
working
in
terms
of
how
we
do
that. And
the
last
piece
for
us,
we
took
in
the
fourth
quarter
of course
the
OHT acquisition,
and
the
revenue
that
the
heavy
transport
ships
and
such
like
that
are
the
sort
of foundation
of
the
OHT
business
cut
in
for
us
as
well. They're
the
main
three
elements
for
that,
Lukas.
Okay.
Sounds
good.
Thank
you.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
the
line
of
Nick
Konstantakis
from
BNP
Paribas
Exane.
Please
ask
your
question.
Hi,
guys.
Thank
you
for
taking
my
question.
I
think
let
me
just
start
by
welcoming
Mark
as
well,
I
think it's
your
first
conference
call.
So
welcome
aboard.
Just
on
the...
Thank you
very
much.
Just
on
the
questions,
please. Look,
I
appreciate
you're
talking
about
2022,
but
I'm
looking
at
2023,
the
revenue
figures
and
the
top
line
being
below
than
2021,
coverage
of
about
43%,
which
is quite
high
given
where
we
are
in
the
cycle.
You
spoke
confidently
about
order
intake
in 2022.
You're
talking
about
good
momentum.
If
that
outlook
were
to
materialize,
could
you
exceed
that?
Or
to
ask
differently,
given
the
backdrop,
isn't the
most
probable outcome
for
2023 top
line is
higher than
2021?
And
then
one
for Mark,
just looking
at
the contract
assets, I
think
they've
been climbing
quite
steadily through
the
course
of
the
year
and
2020.
We'll have
a
decline
this
quarter.
Can
you
just
please
discuss
the
biggest
components
in
there
or
what
drove
the
decline
Q-on-Q,
just
looking,
for
example,
at
Saudi
as
well,
which
could
complete
the
projects
next
year
and
whether
that
would
drive
the
next
step-down?
Thank
you,
guys.
So,
Nick,
I'll
take
the
first
one
and
I'll
hand
over to
Mark
on
the
second.
We
aren't
giving
guidance
today
for
2023.
I'm
giving
you
directional
information
about
which
way
we're
going,
and
we're
comparing
2022
with
2021.
I
think
we've
been
relatively
clear, with
Ricardo and
myself
and
Mark
and
myself,
we
can
see
a
number of
projects
that
go
offshore
from
mid-2023
being
very
important
in
terms
of
the
overall
recovery
and
the
utilization.
And
that
remains
unchanged,
and
those
pieces
of
the jigsaw
are
fitting
together.
We've
talked
in
some
of the
other
questions
about
how
we
see
2024
fitting
together.
So,
I
think
for
today,
we
won't
be
giving
any
further
detail on
2023,
other
than
the
directional
information
that
we've
shared
with
the
market,
and
we
can
see
that
coming.
We
touched
in
the
previous
question
that
the
gap
in
the
CFDs in
the
largest
market
in
the UK
will
mean
the
offshore
work
in
renewables
will
be
lower
in
2023,
and
you
need
to
use
that
in
your
modeling
for
2023.
I'll
then ask
Mark
maybe
to
address
the
questions
on
the
contract
assets.
Yeah,
indeed.
So,
the
contract
assets
is
ostensibly
a
work-in-progress.
This
is
the holding
balance
for
projects
that
haven't
yet
met
the
milestone
contractual
right
to
build
to
the
client.
You're
correct.
We
have
seen
that
increase
between
the
end
of
2020
and
2021,
and
that's
one
of
the
key
factors
contributing
to
the
working
capital
performance.
I
would
expect
that
to
continue
through
2022
next.
And
one
region in particular
contributing?
No.
I
think
we
can
see
the
contribution
across
a
number
of
projects
and
a
number
of
regions.
I
think
we're
all
familiar
with
those
regions
that
have
a
particular
conditions
that
are
customary
to
the
clients
within
that
region.
So
I
would
expect
the
contract
assets
to
remain
elevated
during
2022.
Thank
you.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
Chris
Møllerløkken
from
SpareBank1
Markets.
Please
ask
your
question.
Yes.
Good
afternoon,
gentlemen.
With
regards
to
the
terms
you
are
offering
to
your
clients,
you
talked
about
pricing,
but
do
you
also
try
to
push
out
other
contracting
terms,
like
weather
stand-by,
payment
terms,
etcetera,
and
could
you
give
a
bit
more
flavor
there
and
how
do
you
see
that
development?
The
main
area that
we're
very
clear
with
our
clients
on the
moment
is
the
supply
chain.
We
touched
on
it in
our
prepared
remarks,
unless
we
can
have
a
back-to-back
supplier
pricing
and
delivery
assurance,
or
unless
we
can
have
a
set
of
escalation
mechanisms
that
provide
our
suppliers
with
protection
on
price
of
copper
or
price
of
steel.
So
most
of
our
discussions
with
our
clients
today
about
terms
and
conditions
to
make
sure
that
we
–
make
sure
that
our
supply
chain
exposure
is
passed
up
and
down
the
chain
between
ourselves
and
our
suppliers.
We've
talked
about
previously
that
we've
seen
on
one
reason bid
in
Brazil
an
improvement
in
the
payment
terms.
So
they
are
in the
main
areas
that
we
are
working
on
with
our
clients
at
the
moment.
We
have
a
very
clear
set
of
contracting
principles
inside
Subsea
7.
And
even
in
the
darkest
times
in
the
cycle
here,
we've
always
maintained
our
positions
about
the
types
of
risks
that
we
take
and
such
like
waiting
on
weather.
We
again
are
quite
selective
about
what
we
take,
and
that's
about
do
you
have
a
pool
of
different
opportunities
in
a
certain
market
that
you
could
take
a
view
on
[indiscernible]
(00:55:47) weather
may
play
out
through
a
handful
of
different
projects
in
that
region.
So
for
us,
we
work.
And
as
the
market
strengthens,
we
will
continue
to
work
on
the
risk
profile that
we
take.
For
me,
it's
all
about
the
holistic
risk
profile
on
a
project
and
then
the
contingency
levels
and
the
profit
levels
that
go
with
a
particular
project.
So,
that's
in
a
nutshell
where
we're
at
in
the
moment.
You
have
4.5
million
shares
already
in
Subsea
7
on
your
accounts.
And
you
announced
today
a
repurchase
program
of
around
$70
million.
What
could
be
fair
assumption
regarding
the
fate
of
the
shares
you
are
repurchasing
in
Subsea
7?
Okay.
So,
we
have
a
mandate
from
the
board
for
share
repurchases
out to
April
2023.
We
will
take
a
decision
closer
to
the
time
as
to
whether
those
shares
will
be
cancelled
or
indeed
they
will
be
retained
within
treasury
shares.
So,
too
early
for
us
to
comment
upon
the
fate
of
those
shares
that
have been
bought
back
in
the
recent
repurchase
tranches,
Chris.
Thank
you.
We
have
the
next
questions
coming
from
Kevin
Roger
from
Kepler
Cheuvreux.
Please
ask
your
question.
Yeah.
Good
afternoon.
Thanks.
The
first
one
is
relating
to
the
pricing
environment
in
the
oil
and
gas
business
because
you
mentioned
in
your
remarks,
[indiscernible]
(00:57:15)
to
bid on
BĂşzios 8.
I
was wondering
if
you
can just
give
us
some
metrics
to show
how
the pricing
is
evolving,
if
you
can
give
a
number
or
something like
that
to
show
the
trend. And
the
second question
is
related
to
the
renewable
markets.
I
was
wondering
if
you
can
also
comment
the
competitive
landscape
in
that
space
because
we
have
seen
recently
that Saipem
is
trapped
with
execution
issuing
a
number
of
projects that
provide
energy
as
recently a concern
of
contracts.
So
I
was
wondering
if
you
can
also
give
us
some
color
in
terms
of
the
competitive
landscape
and
the
pricing
environment
in
the
offshore
wind,
please.
As
you
know,
we
have
the
Seaway
7
team
will
be
coming
up
with
their
earnings
release
soon,
so
I'll
let
them
give
you
more
details
on
that.
So,
I
think
coming
back
to
the
pricing
metrics,
I
think,
Kevin,
we
– you
know
us,
we
– despite
the
change
in
the
CFO,
Mark
has worked
with
Subsea 7
for
enough
years
that
we aren't
about
to
change
our
tone for the
[indiscernible]
(00:58:25).
I hope
we've
given
you
enough
information,
Kevin,
to
show
to
you
that
directionally
things
are
heading
the
right
way.
The
market
is
moving
faster.
Our
clients
want
to
talk to
us.
They're
engaging
with
us
earlier.
They
want
to
talk
to
us
about
how
they
can
move
their
projects
ahead,
how
they
can
accelerate
their
projects
ahead.
So
we
hope
you
can
draw
different
thoughts
together
about
what
that means.
We
are
late
cycle,
but
now
is
the
time
that
we
are
making
the
impacts
on
picking
the
work
up
that
will
generate
some
very
good
EBITDAs
for
us
in
2024
and
2025. And
I
think it's important
to
think about
coming
back
to
where
we
are
today.
In
our
sector
today,
there's
us
and
one
other
that
have
a
reasonable
position
in
terms
– and
a
strong
position
in terms
of
balance
sheet
and
position
with
clients,
and
the
clients
are
talking
to
two
of
us.
And there's
a
certain
amount
of
capacity,
and
those
clients
are
very
clear.
There's
a
certain
amount
of
capacity
there;
hence,
the
speed
at
which
discussions
are
taking
place.
I've
spoken
to
many
clients
in
the
last
month
and
the
same
discussion
is
about
please
be
open
with
us
about
your
capacity.
Please
tell
us
what
we
need
to
do
to
secure
that
capacity.
So,
for
me,
I
think,
directionally,
it's
moving
well.
But
we
have
also
been
very
thoughtful
about
how
we
position
ourselves
here
about
the
size
of the
fleet
we
needed,
the
technology
and the
capabilities
we
needed,
the
relationship
with
Schlumberger,
the
76%
share
by
revenue
of
integrated
SURF
and
SPS
that
we
have
today
in
that
market
means,
again,
there's
value
add
in
how
we
do
these
projects.
So,
again,
we're
quite
thoughtful
about
what
we're
doing,
and
that
thoughtfulness
is
also
about
which
clients
we
work
with
and
how
we
will
position
ourselves
for
what
is
a
good
set
of
opportunities
for
us
at
the
moment.
Certainly,
in
wind,
we
are
seeing
that
clients
are
now
starting
to
think
ahead
about.
So,
again,
there's
been
a
number
of
casualties
along
the
way,
so
how
do
they
get
access
to
quality
capability,
which
can
also
take
the
largest-sized
projects
that
are
coming.
You
see
the
recent
leases
in
the
US
and
the
recent
sized
projects
in
the
US.
These
are
huge
projects,
but
two
or
three
contractors
can
do.
So,
I
think,
for
us,
it's
about
how
do
we
position
ourselves
and
how
do
we
get
ourselves
in
the
right
place.
But
I'll
let
the
Seaway
7
guys
spend
a
bit
more
time
on
their
call
to
explain
that,
if
that's
okay
with you,
Kevin.
Okay.
Okay.
Thanks
a
lot.
Well,
thank
you very
much.
Thanks
a
lot
for
everybody's
questions.
And
we
appreciate
your
continued
support
and
input
into
the
market
here.
And
we
will
talk
again
to
you
at
the
end
of
Q1.
Thanks
a
lot.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
that
does
conclude
our
conference
for
today.
Thank
you
for
participating.
You
may
now
disconnect
your
lines.
Thank
you.