Okea ASA
OSE:OKEA

Watchlist Manager
Okea ASA Logo
Okea ASA
OSE:OKEA
Watchlist
Price: 20.14 NOK -2.23%
Market Cap: 2.1B NOK
Have any thoughts about
Okea ASA?
Write Note

Earnings Call Analysis

Summary
Q3-2023

OKEA Q3 Earnings: Strong EBITDA, Divestiture Update, Impairment and Production Growth

OKEA experienced a productive third quarter with a steady increase in output, achieving over 23,700 barrels of oil equivalent per day. Financially, they posted a robust EBITDA exceeding NOK 1.3 billion, however, net profit after tax was lower at NOK 32 million, mainly due to an impairment on Yme asset of NOK 475 million. The company successfully refinanced, extending bond debt maturity and adding $25 million in liquidity, also confirming commitment to dividend payments. Production cost per barrel has dropped below NOK 200, aiding in a net cash flow of NOK 748 million from operations. The Statfjord acquisition is set to close in Q4 2023, with revised production guidance marginally adjusted down to 11,000-12,000 barrels. They have taken measures to mitigate a projected decrease in production for 2024, details of which will be presented in Q4 2023 results.

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2023-Q3

from 0
S
Svein Liknes
executive

Good morning, and welcome to the presentation of the third quarter results for OKEA. We are reporting today from [indiscernible] which is the operation center in [indiscernible] for Draugen, because we are celebrating the 30th anniversary of Draugen this week. Last week was actually the 30th anniversary for Draugen, it was not only Draugen who actually passed that milestone over the last month, but also Brage its 30th anniversary last month. Fun fact there is actually that Brage had the same production or more production actually on that 30th anniversary than they've had over the last 10 years.

So with that, we are presenting then from [indiscernible] as I said, but we are now going to dive into the details for the quarter. With me this morning, I have Birte Norheim, our CFO, who will take you through the finance section, but I will give you an operations update just before that, and we will then have question and answers afterwards. There should also be a link on our web page, which will give you access to questions or a link to where you can ask questions.

The third quarter in a nutshell, our production is gradually increasing. We had an excess of 23,700 barrels of oil equivalent production last month. Brage has continued to deliver above plan. We've had both Draugen, Gjøa,and Ivar Aasen and Nova on plan, and we've had lower production from Yme during the last quarter. The reason for these details, I will go into and we're going through each asset in detail. On the portfolio, I'm very glad to announce that we have now started the [indiscernible] gas tieback to Draugen. We have said now since we sanctioned the project on the 31st of May 2 years ago, we have said we're going to start production on the fourth quarter in 2023, and we actually started production on the first day of the fourth quarter of 2023, and achieving plateau production already on the 6 of October, so this is going rapidly ahead.

Pure gas, 4,400 barrels of oil equivalent to Draugen, which then again converts Draugen to a gas export facility. We have proven oil in the Statfjord East formation at Brage that was previously known as Akin. And we have in-place volumes of between NOK 6 million to NOK 7 million, and that was actually discovered through the longest exploration well in Norway this year, which is 9,050 meters.

So it was quite an achievement. So we are now doing the analysis of how can we get these resources into reserves and produce it over Brage. Plus as well, we passed DG2 during the last quarter, actually in August, and OKEA took over as operator from the 1 of September as we are then maturing that project further to hopefully take a successful investment decision in Q1 next year.

On the financial side, we had a very strong EBITDA during the quarter of, in excess of NOK 1.3 billion. Yme impairment was taken last quarter of NOK 475 million, which is then reducing the net profit after tax by NOK 104 million and takes the net profit after tax to NOK 32 million in total.

We did a refinancing of the company, and that was successfully executed early in the quarter, and that is then extending the maturity of our outstanding bond debt and is adding new liquidity through the RCF of $25million. This is also a new entry then into the bank market for OKEA. We are net cash positive, that is obviously an enabler for the settlement of the Statfjord deal during Q4. And we did execute on the dividend payment in September, and we are also going to pay the dividend of NOK 1 per share in December as per our dividend plan for 2023.

High level, production or serious incident frequency, as you can see, that is stable. That is the foundation of what we're doing that we need to have safe operations. So I'm glad to see that we are maintaining that. And that is obviously a rolling average. So it will drop as we are not having more incidents. CO2 intensity, which is an annualized figure, still on 23 kilo per BOE produced.

Production, as I just mentioned,in excess of 23,700 , which is an increase from previous quarter production expense, we are glad to see that, that is dropping from above 200 to below NOK 200 per BOE this quarter, which is somewhat related to more production volumes, but also reduce cost. The net cash flow from operations is NOK 748 million, mainly affected that we did a late lifting on Draugen during the quarter, which was good in relation to timing of the oil price. But the actual settlement for that lifting and that cargo will then happen in Q4.

And as I just mentioned, we executed on the dividend plan, as we have said in the past. Production. As you can see here, we are gradually increasing production during the year. This is from our own assets. We have much more diversity in our portfolio now than we used to have in the past. So we are not so sensitive to operational upsets. So quite evenly distributed on production over the quarter. And as you can see around the production reliability as well, very high reliability on our assets, some upsets has happened. You can see on Draugen in particular, we have dropped from 94% to 88%, And that was because we did a subsea pump change out, which then ended up in July with 13 days of shutdown. Brage a very high uptime, which is, we are glad to see, Gjøa had slightly lower uptime compared to previous quarter, which is mainly related to a plant shutdown, but also some issues with the shutdown in the St Fergus reception terminal, where they're exporting gas.

Ivar Aasen was in very high uptime and Yme had a very high uptime in the last quarter, somewhat lower this quarter because of seal on an export compressor that they started leaking in July that they had to fix. And Nova is a tieback to Gjøa, so that very much relates to the performance of Gjøa. Again, the most important thing here, though, is the diversification of our portfolio, as we have mentioned in the past. We are gradually increasing production and these volumes are obviously not including the volumes, which will be part of the Statfjord transaction. Which will be closed in Q4.

Quick operational update on our assets. Draugen. I just mentioned the Hasselmus production started on the first of October, a very quick bean up of that gas producer. So we are actually producing at the plateau production as we speak. We did have the 13 days of shutdown in July to install the new subsea pumps. The water depth on Draugen is actually in excess of 250 meters. So we have subsea pumps that will aid with the lifting of the oil and water to the installation. And we also drilled 2 observation wells in July with TransOcean. So evaluation of those observation wells is ongoing. We did see oil columns in both of those wells, and we are now assessing how can those as well be tied into Draugen for the future.

Second operated platform, which is Brage. We add more wells on Brage. The success case on Brage is to continuously drill new wells, which we have done since we started. That's also the reason why the production of Brage has increased from 7,000 gross barrels per day to above 18,000, 19,000 as we are seeing now. So we've had good success with that. And we have a net [indiscernible] of production now of 6,000 barrels of oil equivalent to OKEA.

So Brage is really delivering. We are putting more wells in Q4, more well some stream in Q4 in 2023 on Brage and Brasse concept. We passed that digit on that Brasse project. As we have said in the past, 30 million barrels of oil equivalent, which is 13 kilometers away from Brage, which we are working very hard with the other partners to mature to a financial, to an investment decision next year. So we hopefully then can produce that over Brage.

Gjøa still a very good asset for OKEA, somewhat lower production in the quarter due to the scheduled shutdown. And also, as I mentioned, the St Fergus issues that they had to reduce production on. Hamlet discovery is a tieback and the discovery that was done last year and that is a potential tieback to Gjøa and that is being matured and looked at now in relationship with other targets in the same area, how can we then maybe have an area development of these discoveries.

Ivar Aasen, very good availability and production during the quarter. There are 2 wells, which is planned to be converted into injectors. Ivar Aasen as well is maturing as an asset. So if there is more use of these wells as injectors rather than producers, that is something we are doing for the draining strategy. And we are also then planning for the infill oil or increased oil recovery program with more wells to be drilled from 2026.

The Yme feild, there was a reduction in production in July, as I mentioned, due to this compressor sale, but the most notable thing with Yme during this quarter is that we have reduced our net reserves on Yme by 1.8 million barrels of oil, which is based on the data from new wells. We are doing decline analysis on these new wells where we are looking at water cut, pressure and how actually we are balancing the reservoir and the drainage strategy and are using that to update our data and our modeling.

So we then took a decision and based on these assessments and this analysis to reduce our net reserves on Yme. And we're also expecting then a plateau production to be 3,500 barrels of oil equivalents per day when we are a plateau. But there are still more wells to be drilled on Yme. So we have 1 injector which is now planned for Q4 in 2023 and 1 producer, which is planned for early 2024. Then we have the full planned well stock available for Yme. And then we will, together with the other partners in the licenser, see if there is other infill potential as well in the same area. But that's when we have the full picture of Yme.

The Nova, which is a tieback to Gjøa. We have improved production during the quarter because we have drilled a water inject to support the pressure in the reservoir and also to increase the drainage strategy. And we have also secured in the partnership, a rig for the fourth quarter over the second half of 2024 to do the fourth water injector to actually, again, get more pressure support from the [indiscernible] to increase production again from Nova.

So with that, I will stop the operational update and well, I have one more slide. I have to Statfjord slide, which is being closed now in Q4. Again, this is a very significant transaction for OKEA. It will increase production for OKEA significantly. Statfjord has been and will still be a giant on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, where we can increase recovery rate, and that will actually boost production even more. We are protected from any decommissioning until 2038 on this field, and we are working very closely already as an integrated part of the Statfjord asset, although we are not a partner yet. We are working very closely within the license to see how can we mature Statfjord going further.

We are expecting a close of the contract or the SPA agreement on the 30th of November in 2023. But obviously, the effective date for the transaction will be first of January of 2023. We have guided production on Statfjord from between 11,000 to 13,000 earlier this year. We have adjusted that to now be between 11,000 and 12,000, so we have taken down the upside, but we are maintaining the floor. So that is an adjustment we have made based on the 2023 numbers.

There is also an updated RMB from the operator, which has been submitted, which indicates a reduction of around 3,000 barrels of oil from next year. So we are now working together with the operator and also [indiscernible] Energy to assess the data to give more details into the 2024 guiding and the impact that this will have we will then update the market on our 2024 guiding when we are presenting the Q4 2023 results in February next year.

And we are working closely in the asset and in the license as well, how can we mitigate the impact of this reduction? How can we drill wells more effectively? How can we put them into production more effectively and how can we actually increase the draining of the reservoir and Statfjord. So that is work ongoing. And with that, I will hand over to Birte, who will take you through the financials, then I'll come back for a quick summary before we then dive into the Q&A session. So thank you.

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Thank you, Svein. The third quarter was characterized by an overall stable production, which also drives our unit production cost down. It was also characterized by a significant increase in crude prices, which had a positive impact on revenues, but also resulted in some unrealized losses in relation to hedging and contingent payments, which increases the effective tax rate. As Svein has already mentioned, we also recognized another impairment on the Yme asset which is a noncash item but has a significant impact on our net profit after tax for the quarter.

We were very pleased to have completed a successful refinancing, which extends the maturity of our outstanding bond debt, and I will refer to further details on all of these matters and more starting with our production and sales. We produced 23,700 barrels of oil equivalents per day in the quarter, which is an increase of 6% compared to the previous quarter. Draugen, Gjøa, Ivar Aasen and Nova all produced according to plan. Production from email was impacted by technical issues in July. The Talisker East well at Brage continues to perform well and has sustained production above plan. We sold 26,700 barrels of oil equivalents per day, and the increase compared to previous quarter was mainly due to crude liftings on both Brage and Nova as well as higher gas volumes sold at Brage.

Partly offsetting this was no crude liftings from Gjøa in the current quarter. Market prices for gas were relatively stable during the quarter. However, we do not have a repeat of the high hedging gain on physical gas contracts as previous quarter. when the hedging gain resulted in an increase in realized prices of more than $23 per barrel equivalent. The current quarter effect is an increase of less than $1 per barrel in increase. The resulting average realized price for natural gas for third quarter amounted to $61.9 per barrel compared to the oil equivalent pricing.

Oil prices fluctuated quite a bit during the quarter and starting just above $75 per barrel and steadily moving upwards, touching nearly $100 at the end of the quarter. The average realized price for liquids amounted to $89 per barrel.

And overall, this resulted in a total petroleum revenue of NOK 2,131 million. The graph to the left illustrates the OKEA allocated listings of crude over the last 5 quarters, marked by the light blue bars. As well as the market price, which is marked by the yellow line. OKEA had 8 cargoes of crude listed in third quarter, 4 cargoes for a total of 201,000 barrels were lifted from Yme, and in August, we had 338,000 barrels from Ivar Aasen. And in September, we had 636,000 barrels from Draugen and 209,000 barrels from Nova being lifted.

We also illustrate the completed and planned cargoes for the fourth quarter marked in dark blue and in gray, respectively. Lifting of 78,000 barrels from Yme has already taken place in October. We also expect 330,000 barrels from Brage in October. And in addition, we expect a lifting of 615,000 barrels from Draugen and 3 liftings from Yme for a total of 144,000 barrels in November.

And in December, we expect a lifting of 374,000 barrels from Brage and a lifting of 66,000 barrels from Yme. The graph to the right outlines the difference between the average market price for [indiscernible] quarter of $86.7 per barrel compared to the average realized liquids price for OKEA of $89 per barrel. The key driver for the positive differential relates to the timing of crude liftings, particularly since the liftings from both Draugen and Nova took place at the end of September, when prices were peaking and towards the higher end compared to the average.

Following a period of extreme volatility in gas prices over the last year or so, prices were relatively stable during the quarter. On this graph, we illustrate the average volumes of gas sold per month since July last year and the observable average market prices for NBP in the same period. The increase in volumes of gas sold in the third quarter was due to higher gas production at Brage. So let's move to the profit and loss statement.

Petroleum revenue from sales of petroleum revenue was NOK 2,131 billion. And total operating income was NOK 2.105 billion. The differential is other operating loss of NOK 26 million. The operating loss was mainly a result of increased forward prices for crude which resulted in an unrealized cost of NOK 39 million related to the estimated value of the contingent consideration to Wintershall Dea and a net loss on financial hedging.

These effects were partly offset by NOK 26 million in tariff income at Gjøa, income from joint utilization of logistic resources of NOK 9 million. Production expenses amounted to NOK 465 million or NOK 195 per barrel. Production expense was down by NOK 28 per barrel compared to previous quarter, due to the increase in produced volumes combined with lower expenses following completion of the turnaround at Draugen in the previous quarter.

We recognized an impairment of NOK 475 million related to the Yme asset following the downward revision of reserves, which is in part offset by an increase in forward prices for oil. And we'd like to remind you again that as the Yme asset in effect is recognized at fair value. It means that any changes in macro conditions or in asset performance will result in further impairments or alternatively in full or partial reversal of previous impairments going forward.

As such, there is a potential for some volatility to the profit and loss statement relating to the Yme asset in particular. Exploration and operating expenses amounted to NOK 80 million and comprised SG&A expenses of NOK 46 million and exploration expenses of NOK 34 million, mainly relating to various field evaluation activities and further development of the Brasse discovery. Net financial income amounted to NOK 24 million and mainly related to net currency gain of NOK 49 million as well as interest income of NOK 29 million.

Net expense interest and fees of NOK 14 million relates to interest on the bonds as well as the Yme bareboat charter. In relation to the refinancing executed in the quarter, the call premium of NOK 28 million for OKEA03 were expensed. Tax expenses amounted to NOK 428 million, which brings the net profit to NOK 32 million, and the high tax rate of 93% and was mainly due to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration to Wintershall Dea as it is recognized on a post-tax basis.

Moving on to the balance sheet. Cash and cash equivalents amounted to NOK 2.346, billion. Tax payable was NOK 1.748 billion, and relates to accrued tax for 2023. Interest-bearing bond loans was NOK 1.3 billion and comprised the OKEA04 bond of $125 million. Other interest-bearing liabilities of NOK 511 million relates to OKEA's share of the future obligations under the bareboat charter of the Inspire rig at the Yme field.

Asset retirement obligations ended this quarter at NOK 5.6 billion. And this liability is partly offset by asset retirement receivables from Shell and Wintershall DEA of NOK 3.4 billion. Cash generation from operations were just above NOK 1 billion in the quarter. This is lower than the sales income should indicate mainly due to the receivables from nearly 850,000 barrels lifted from Draugen and Nova in September being received in October. Taxes paid of NOK 276 million relates to the first tax installment paid for 2023. Cash used in investment activities amounted to NOK 534 million, and mainly relates to investments in Hasselmus, power from shore, modification work at Draugen as well as the Brage infill drilling.

Interest paid of NOK 42 million relates to the interest on the OKEA03 bond, which was paid upon execution of the call in September. And also an element, the interest element on the bareboat charter. We paid NOK 1 per share in dividend in September, which amounts to a total of SEK 104 million. And the cash balance at quarter end was in excess of NOK 2.3 billion and more than NOK 1 billion above the outstanding bond debt. Cash balance for the, so far this year, steady performance and high salt volumes have resulted in cash generation from operating activities of as much as NOK 4.2 billion.

Taxes paid of NOK 776 million relates to the last 3 installments of tax paid for 2022 as well as the first tax paid for 2023. And we expect a tax refund for 2022 of NOK 75 million in the fourth quarter. Cash used in investment activities amounted to NOK 1.5 billion for the first 3 quarters and mainly relates to, again, investments in Hasselmus, Power From Shore, modification work at Draugen and Brage drilling. Cash paid in business combination of NOK 297 million relates to the $25 million deposit paid to Equinor in relation to the Statfjord transaction, of NOK 263 million equivalent and NOK 34 million paid to the Wintershall DEA in the final pro contra settlement as well as contingent consideration.

In total, we generate cash equivalent to about NOK 15 per share in the first 3 quarters of the year. And dividend of NOK 3 per share amounts to a total dividend payment of NOK 312 million in the period. As Svein mentioned, in September, we completed a successful refinancing, which extended maturity of the outstanding bond debt to 2026. In addition, we have, for the first time, accessed the bank market in the form of a $25 million revolving credit facility.

We issued $125 million bond, which we refer to as the OKEA04 bond with a fixed interest of 9.125% and it matures in September of '26. I must say that we were very pleased to note a strong investor demand and a book that was oversubscribed more than 2x at final pricing. Upon issuing the new bond, we call the OKEA03 bond with original maturity in December of at the premium of 3.2%. The new financing structure is robust with low leverage and there is substantial additional debt capacity to fund potential additional future growth. The revolving credit facility provides for additional financial flexibility at a relatively low cost. In total, we paid dividends of NOK 2.90 per share in 2022.

When we started the current year, we communicated an intention to pay NOK 4 per share in 2023. NOK 3 per share were paid in the first 3 quarters, and the Board has now sold to pay NOK 1 per share in December in accordance with the stated plan. As for the dividend plan for 2024, as mentioned, we will revert to this in relation to the financial reporting for fourth quarter.

With 1 quarter of the year remaining, we have narrowed our guiding interval for the year. And according to plan, production has ramped up in the third quarter with the new wells coming on stream. Production guiding has therefore been narrowed from 22,000 to 25,000 barrels to 23,000 to 24,000 barrels of oil equivalents per day. CapEx guiding has also been narrowed from NOK 1.7 billion to NOK 2.1 billion to a range of NOK 1.95 billion to NOK 2.1 billion. None of the guiding includes the effect from the Statfjord transaction. And as Svein has already mentioned, we expect production from Statfjord fuel for the current year to be in the range of 11,000 to 12,000 barrels of oil equivalents per day net to OKEA.

So that's all for me for now, and I'll give the word back to you, Svein for some closing remarks. Thank you.

S
Svein Liknes
executive

On summary then for the quarter. OKEA's continuing to deliver on the growth strategy. We are closing the Statfjord acquisition in Q4 this year in November, which will add significant production volumes to OKEA. We have executed and delivered the Hasselmus tieback project to Draugen, as we have said we would do and start the production from Hasselmus in Q4, the first day in Q4, which is now producing 4,400 barrels of oil equivalent, a pure gas to Draugen, which has then enabled both gas export and also NGL export from Draugen. Brage, the business case on Brage was always identified to be drill more wells and put them in production. We have delivered on that strategy for Brage, and we have had a very good quarter from Brage, which is still sustainable.

Draugen, Gjøa, Ivar Aasen and Nova is also producing according to plan. We have done a successful refinancing during the quarter, which has given us more financial flexibility and robustness and we are net cash positive, and we are delivering on the 2023 dividend plan, as we have said. So with that, I hope that you will join us for the Q&A session. That will be where I will be joined by Birte again. So with that, I will thank you very much for your attendance in this presentation, and I hope to hear from you in the Q&A session. Thank you.

[Technical Difficulty]

T
Teodor Nilsen
analyst

Half of the remaining payments to be settled through the netting of cash flow from production up until closing. And is there any reason to expect that the 3,000 barrel impact is purely related to 2024? .

B
Birte Norheim
executive

I apologize, but the line was a bit poor here. So let's start with a few of your questions, and please repeat if we're not addressing all of your questions. But I can definitely confirm that we've had Bakala for lunch and dinner over the last couple of days, always great.

You asked about the target production of above 40% for 2024. And until we have full clarification in our expectation. So now we refer to what the operator has done in there to revised national budget reporting, which is a reduction of 3,000 barrels per day on average for next year until we get full clarification in our view and what is all issues driving this.

But I do expect that we will end up in that area around 40-ish% based on what we know today. And do you want to say something about the reserves versus the future beyond production of Statfjord beyond 2024, Svein?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Yes, I can do that. And that is also a bit early. The evaluation of the effects of, it's quite technical. The reason why we have reduced the average production for next year from Statfjord. It's related to the pressurization of the reservoir and Statfjord and also the gas then liberated, which will be less and therefore, also less production. So that work is still ongoing. So we do not expect that there will be any impact on it. But obviously, that work is still ongoing, but we have not made any assessments or analysis, which supports that we should change that number.

B
Birte Norheim
executive

And I do think you had a couple of more questions that we haven't addressed. Could I ask you to please repeat?

T
Teodor Nilsen
analyst

Sure thing. The last question was on Yme. Can you share the remaining book value Yme following the impairment? And would you say it's fair to assume that you impaired more than half of the book value this quarter?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

You mean in accumulated terms, I assume. And we do not disclose book values on each asset. But in broad aspects in a cumulative terms, we have impaired around half of the book value or so. What we do always try to remind us is that when we do carry an asset at fair value, any changes in macro or in asset performance or reserves, will result in impairments or reverse impairments going forward. But what we have accounted for in the third quarter financial statements is our best estimate as of today.

T
Teodor Nilsen
analyst

All right. I was referring to your comment in Q2 when you said that there was less than NOK 1 billion mark remaining book value at Yme, and then with the NOK 475 million this quarter, I assume that you have impaired more than half of what you had at Q2?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Okay. I understand. But the book value is on a post-tax basis.

Operator

The next question will be from the line of Rod Hardison from Clarkson Securities.

U
Unknown Analyst

We saw you took a very optimistic view on gas hedging last year in the wake of Ukraine-Russia war when gas prices spiked. Now in late September and early October, we've seen quite attractive levels on oil prices. Should we expect you to take a more active approach to hedging also oil going forward? And if yes, should we expect that to be mainly in terms of colors or you also like call options? Or would that be also in [indiscernible] [ so liquid options or other ways for hedging ]?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Thank you,. I think it's a fair question. And as we have stated earlier this year, towards the closing of Statfjord fuel and beyond when we have a significant overhang of tax liabilities that is to be settled in the first half of next year. We are undertaking a more conservative approach to hedging than what we normally do. Or that's what we have done in the past, I should say.

And I think you will, we are assessing a combination of all of these factors. So I think it's unlikely that we will lock in, for example, all of the upside, but that we are focused on securing the downside and at the same time, trying to manage the premium. So I think the answer is that you will see a combination of those instruments that you're referring to.

Operator

Thank you all. As there are no more questions in this call. I will hand it over to the speakers for any written questions online.

U
Unknown Executive

Thank you. First, two questions from a private investor. The first one, a lot has happened since OKEA announced their first dividend plan. For the next dividend plan, which will be presented next year as to OKEA are aiming for increasing dividends in 2024? Second question is, could you please elaborate a little bit about why investors should invest in OKEA instead of other operators on the NCS?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Okay. Thank you for the questions. Yes, you are correct that a lot has happened since we announced our first dividend plan. And I think until we communicate a dividend plan for 2024, I'd rather not comment on whether we're expecting to see an increase or not, but I can refer to our capital allocation principles that the key target is to the base target is to maintain a solid balance sheet and thereafter to balanced growth with direct distributions to shareholders.

But I guess, stay tuned until the fourth quarter reporting in February where more information will be given.

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Yes. And I can take question number two, which is, could you please elaborate a bit about why investors should invest in OKEA instead of other operators on the NCS? That's a good question. But I should refrain from advising investors where to put the money. But what I can say though is I believe that OKEA has a very clear strategy. I believe that the strategy is so clear that investors at least know what they're putting the money in. When it comes to valuation and when it comes to our portfolio and also an objective view of that, I would recommend to read the analyst reports, which is quite thorough out there.

U
Unknown Executive

Thanks. Next question is from another private investor. What will be your expected volume breakeven costs on Statfjord is incorporated? And what was the quarterly investments for the quarter?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Okay. I can take that. So the quarterly investments in the existing OKEA portfolio was just in excess of NOK 500 million and mainly relates to customers, which has started operations now on the 1 of October as well as the brake infill drilling. So NOK 515 million, if I recall correctly, it was the total CapEx in the quarter. All in breakeven costs, yes, as you have seen in our financial statements for this quarter, our per barrel has come down now that volumes have, is on the increase. And as you have also seen over the last few quarters, the cost also depends on what maintenance turnarounds is taking place.

But on average, I would expect that our cost for our existing portfolio is roughly $20 a barrel. And when we launched the Statfjord transaction, we also communicated in the same region for Statfjord. We do not guide on the all in, but that the information, I now provide now was for the OpEx all it depends on given our portfolio, the number of projects that we are undertaking and where they are in the facing could have a significant variation between quarters and as well as years.

U
Unknown Executive

Next question is from [indiscernible]. How do you see oil and gas prices developing into the new year?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Again, another question, which is very hard to predict. But obviously, we our strategy and what we announced previously as well was that we believe in a strong market. We believe that oil and gas is in strong demand for Europe because they need the energy that we actually can provide. But obviously, it's quite fragile. The macro picture out there. So, but again, we believe that we will see a strong demand. But obviously, we have always been a cyclical business and will always be a cyclical business.

So we are also prepared for fluctuations in the oil price. But for the short term, we do believe that there is strong demand for our product, which will then dictate the prices wherever they will end.

U
Unknown Executive

Next question on the web is from Daniel Stenslet, in Arctic Securities. Can you elaborate on what drives the reduction in the next year to Statfjord production? Do you see any risk to existing Statfjord reserves? Or is this just delayed production?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Well, I can answer that one. And to take the last one first, we believe that it will not have any impact on reserves, but that analysis is obviously already going. When it comes to technical, why this is actually happening, there is a mix, obviously, of both oil and gas being produced from Statfjord, the draining training strategy on the reservoir on the Statfjord you are producing water, which will then decrease the pressure in the reservoir.

The decreased pressure will then liberate more gas from the oil phase. Therefore, you will have increased gas production. We've had issues on, to produce that water. Therefore, we have not had the depressurization as planned when the original forecast was. So that is the kind of the technical reason where we are seeing the reduced production. Other things is that it has taken longer time than anticipated to get the wells into production on Statfjord compared to what was planned for. That's a very ambitious plan for drilling more wells on Statfjord, and the whole strategy to drain the massive Statfjord reservoir is to get more wells online and that has taken longer time to drill.

And it has also taken a bit longer time to take them into production once they are completed drilling. So it's a bit of a complex picture. But as I said, we are together with both the operator of Equinor and also [indiscernible] energy reviewing that analysis now. So we'll get back to that when we get back to the guiding.

U
Unknown Executive

Yes. Next question is from [indiscernible] securities. Also on Statfjord, can you provide additional details on the issues at Statfjord, is this slightly a temporary production issue? Or should we expect reserves to be lowered?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

I think we answered that in the previous question.

U
Unknown Executive

The next question is from [indiscernible] in SEB. In terms of capital allocation, how would you prioritize inorganic growth versus an increase in dividends?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Yes, it's also a good question, and I'm afraid possibly a boring answer, but it's a balancing act. And it depends on what kind of value accretive investments we see ahead. So we would not consider staying overly capitalized if we don't see any value-accretive way to put those, that capital into work. Can you take back the question? Yes. Yes. So yes, it's a balancing act.

But the fact that we are investing in production, the majority of our investments has been in production. And with payback in about a year or less than a year for the biggest investments that we have undertaken over the last couple of years. That could be a temporary impact on dividends, but as dividend capacity is one of the key criteria we assess when we look into potential investments. That should come then in the form of increased dividends in the medium to long term.

U
Unknown Executive

Next question is from Paul Dal in Sparebank 1 Markets. Can you please update on your growth outlook plans for company development? And the factors impacting your likely success?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Well, I can answer that one. Our growth outlook, we are obviously continuously looking for inorganic growth. But as we have said before, we want to grow. We want to grow where you can see we can add value, but we also want to demonstrate capital discipline as we are doing so. But obviously, we have taken this company now from 16,000 barrels of oil per day to close to 40,000 next year. And therefore, we still believe that, that is the right thing to do for the company. We have also demonstrated we can turn assets around.

So that is something we want to do more of, but it needs to be something that fits our strategy and something that we regard as has a value potential like, for example, Brage, which had in production per day when the gross when we took over and which is now covering around 18 000, 19,000 barrels per day. But we're also doing organic growth. We just started Hasselmus with 4,400 barrels of oil equivalents per day into Draugen on the first of October.

So we must not forget the organic path either. We also announced, as you may have seen the discovery of 6 million to 12 million in-place barrels of oil in the area around Brage then we are also evaluating how we can put Brage obviously also developing the Brasse from DG2 to hopefully a robust financial low investment decision in Q1 next year. So, so we are doing both inorganic but also organic growth. And I believe for the last 2 years, we have demonstrated that we are able actually to grow and also open actions behind our strategy.

So that is something that continues.

U
Unknown Executive

Then we have 2 questions from David [indiscernible] in [indiscernible] . Can you give any further detail on the new asset and the reasons for the underperformance? Is there any upside to the field life? Second question, how does the Board balance the competing capital allocation aims of reinvestment and shareholder returns.

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Yes, I can do the first one on the Yme. The update on Yme is that we are still drilling more wells. The decline analysis that we have done, which resulted in the impairment. That is based on the results we have seen so far. On the new wells drilled, but also the performance of the existing wells that we have seen. We are working with the other partners now in the Yme license to evaluate our assessment, our analysis to see what are the long-term implications of this, and there's no update to the field life as such. Our job is to ensure that we are producing commercially as long as possible on Yme and drilling of new wells to get more potential is still ongoing.

B
Birte Norheim
executive

As for the second question, I think we already responded to that when [indiscernible] questioned.

U
Unknown Executive

Then we have a new question from a private investor. What do you think about the future for exploration in the band Sea? Do you think OKEA strategic can change in the future?

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Well, Everything can change in the future. But our strategy when it comes to the [ Barents Sea ] is that, that is not in the core of what we are trying to focus on. That is also the reason we want to be very specific and very clear on our strategy that we are mid to late life asset operator. I want to be best in that one.

Therefore, exploration in the Barents Sea falls outside of that strategy. So that is not analysis. But depends on in the future, nobody knows what will happen in the future, but that is not part of our core strategy currently. So we're not going there.

U
Unknown Executive

Yes. Another follow-up question. Are you experiencing increased interest from investors to know more about OKEA lately?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Yes, I would say yes to that. I was just looking at how our, the number of investors have increased since we launched our revised strategy back in October of 2021. And at the time, we were about, we had about 3,000 investors. As of today, we are nearing 6,000 investors, so nearly doubling. We also saw, as I mentioned, in the refinancing significant interest from all regions, all expected regions of the world, I should say, Asia, U.S., Europe, mainland Europe, U.K. as well as U.S. [indiscernible]. So actually nearly 2.5x oversubscribed at final pricing. So I would say that we are experiencing increased investor interest, which I guess it also makes sense that when we are growing and becoming our market cap has increased.

So yes, we are seeing an increased interest.

U
Unknown Executive

And the new question from Oleg. Follow up on the capital allocation question. When you say we want to stay overly capitalized, what sort of liquidity metrics and levels are important to OKEA. Defining where you think of yourselves as overly capitalized?

B
Birte Norheim
executive

It's a fair sort of question. And again, I'm afraid it's a boring question one, but it depends on where we are at in our investment cycles, what kind of opportunities. So I guess the best way to say it is that if we are confident in our liquidity position, if based on the certain stress testing on pricing developments and such, and we don't see potential. Siri have some opinion on this, too. And if we don't have investment objects that we consider value accretive to put the capital into work, then that is a balancing point, I would say.

U
Unknown Executive

That was all questions online. I hand it back to the moderator to see if there are any few questions online.

Operator

We don't have anyone queued in the call. So I'll hand it straight back to you. .

S
Svein Liknes
executive

Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you very much for attending the presentation as well and also for following OKEA. We really appreciate it. So the biggest milestones now coming up for us is to complete the transaction with Statfjord.And then looking forward to speak to you again as we are presenting Q4 in February next year at latest.

B
Birte Norheim
executive

Thank you.