B

Bergenbio ASA
OSE:BGBIO

Watchlist Manager
Bergenbio ASA
OSE:BGBIO
Watchlist
Price: 11.8 NOK -5.9% Market Closed
Market Cap: 479.2m NOK
Have any thoughts about
Bergenbio ASA?
Write Note

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2024-Q3

from 0
M
Martin Olin
executive

Good morning. My name is Martin Olin, and I would like to welcome you to the third quarter 2024 update from BerGenBio. I would like to remind everyone about the forward-looking statement. The Q3 highlights and post period highlights, i.e., the period after the third quarter, importantly, consists of significant updates from the BGB16 study, our study of bemcentinib in the frontline therapy in non-small cell lung cancer for STK11 mutated patients. We completed the enrollment in the Phase Ib study and we saw an encouraging safety profile. But also importantly, we saw that the plasma levels of or in the therapeutic relevant window, which is also encouraging, and it confers very well to what we saw in the BTB008 study, which was in the second line non-small cell lung cancer study. We are advancing the collaboration with Tempus such that the contextual benchmark arm will be available when we are announcing the Phase IIa results and even with the interim data. The equipment activities are now fully up to speed with all sites being activated, I'll come back to that a little bit later.

And we now expect the first interim analysis of the Phase IIa study to occur in the first part of 2025. I think we can say that it's really encouraging that STK11 mutated patients in frontline therapy consists or represents a significant unmet medical need and the publication of data that supports this continues to evolve. And it is that the population in frontline therapy that actually have STK11 mutations. So that's reassuring from a marketing -- from a market potential, but we also believe that given the mechanism of action of been we might be able to show a difference by stimulating the immune response from the current standard of care, which is checkpoint inhibition combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy. On a financial basis, year-to-date operating expenses was NOK 117.9 million year-to-date versus NOK 148.3 million in 2023, representing a 20% decrease over last year.

The operating expenses in the third quarter, in particular, were quite close to the operating expenses in the third quarter of last year but there are some quarterly variations primarily linked to the sourcing of standard of care, which is supported for the 16 study. The cash position at the end of the third quarter was almost NOK 175 million compared to NOK 200 million at the end of the second quarter this year. So a relatively lower burn and somewhat below the guidance that we have provided of NOK 40 million a quarter. but we still expect it to be around that NOK 40 million on a forward-going basis. We have 2 updates on other programs in the pipeline, 1 to, which we announced back in 2022 announced that we would no longer pursue the development of that compound ourselves, but we would seek a partner. Unfortunately, it's not been possible to identify an attractive opportunity with the partnering arrangement, and therefore, we've decided to discontinue all the activities.

ADC Therapeutics have in-licensed an X antibody from BerGenBio and has an ongoing Phase Ib program, ADCT-601, which they have informed us that they have discontinued due to a narrow therapeutic window, and I will come back to both of these events. If we come back on the main focus of BerGenBio, which is the 16 study in frontline therapy for STK11 mutated patients in non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer. We believe it represents a significant opportunity from a couple of viewpoints. The first one being although checkpoint inhibition is very effective if you have a high PD-L1 expression. It is not that effective if you have a low or negative PDL expression and I'll come back to that a little bit later. But also additionally, it's known that there are a number of mutational drivers, so-called oncogenic drivers that actually will indicate the relevance of standard of care therapy towards this petition. And STK11 mutations is clearly a nonactionable mutation. There's no targeted therapy available for the mutation.

And we are seeing a significant number of the patients suffering from an effective treatment in today's situation. Another new publication that sort of supports what we -- the bold move we made in 2022 is that STK11 mutation is really characterized by having a high incidence of a negative PD-L1 expression, meaning that they are not likely to benefit from checkpoint inhibition. And this graph shows that STK11 actually has the highest number of a negative PD-L1 expression. Also, newly announced data confirms that the significant unmet medical need is actually relevant from a number of medical viewpoints. One is the overall response rate, which is significantly lower than the wild type situation, but also which is very meaningful for the patients, is that even if you would respond the median overall or progression-free survival overall survival is significantly lower than the wild type with statistical significance. So this all points to what I said before, a significant unmet medical need and no targeted therapies available. This translates into a significant market opportunity.

In the Western world, we believe this is around 30,000 patients on an annual basis. that will be eligible for the treatment combination of bemcentinib plus standard of care. And this translates at the current market price for such a treatment of around USD 4 billion on an annual basis. If we come in on further on why we believe tilvestamab could make a difference here. Just to remind everyone, bemcentinib is a TKI inhibitor, small molecule. We believe that it's highly selective for AXL, and therefore, there will be associated with fewer side effects. We have seen monotherapy in a number of indications. We have an extensive safety database. We have started the molecule in more than 600 patients today. We've also proven that it actually improves the outcome for the patients in combination with chemotherapy on the one hand, which was the 005 study but also with checkpoint inhibition, which was the 008 study, which we reported earlier.

It concentrates interestingly in the lung by a over normal tissue, which is, of course, relevant. For the disease we're treating, but it also importantly crosses the blood brain barrier, which is also relevant because, unfortunately, a number of the -- even the frontline patients with metastatic disease have brain metastasis we have received a fast track designation from the FDA in this particular indication, and our IP should protect us until 2042. If we look at the scientific rationale for why we are doing this quadruplet combination is that if we look at immune responsive tumor, it's really characterized with the presence of CD8+ T cells, a PD-1 relevant expression and also supported dendritic cells in an immune suppressed tumor environment, we see that there is no CD8+ cells or at least lack of them. there is a low or negative PD-L1 expression, and there is suppressive dendritic cells. And we believe by stimulating the immune system to the axle pathway by inhibiting the AXL. cell surface protein, we can restore checkpoint inhibition response but also delayed the resistance to chemotherapy.

If we then home in on the ongoing study, the 16 study, this is a schematic overview of the study. So we completed the Phase Ib study, 3 doses studied 7,500 and 150 milligram. We have gotten the approval from the data monitoring safety boards we had with 2 doses, 100 and 150 into the IIa study. If we then look at the Phase I design to include STK11 patients, as we have reported, we have completed the enrollment, and we are following up the patients that are still on treatment. The Phase IIa study, which is a global study, meaning that we are conducted in the U.S. and in Europe in selected countries in 32 active sites is designed to enroll 40 patients, and those patients are patients that have a confirmed mutation in the STK11 gene the recruitment is ongoing, and we remain positive about being able to enroll the 40 patients within the guidance we have provided. We've seen a couple of administrative delays in some sites but they are being addressed as we speak. So I don't expect that this will significantly impact the moment.

This slide is going back to the question, with the new doses and some of the audience will remember that in the previous studies, bemcentinib was administrated as a loading dose of 400 milligrams followed by a daily dose of 200-milligram and it was given with no particular restriction as to with food or without food. Our modeling data clearly shows that it should be given with food, but the modeling data also shows that it is -- probably not necessary to give such a high dose, particularly in a setting where we have 2 other or 3 other therapies, checkpoint inhibition, which has its own side effects but also platinum-doublet chemotherapy, which also has its own safety issues. So we decided based on that model to bring the dose down and have no loading dose and this slide on the left-hand side is actually what we have seen in the 008 study, so in about 100 patients when we combine it with checkpoint inhibition. And it clearly shows that the lower quartile of exposure, i.e., not the highest 1 are actually within the therapeutic window conferring to durable and long responses to the therapy.

And the plasma test that we have done in the 16 study on the left hand -- on the right-hand side really confirms that the 100-milligram is exactly in the sweet spot of the therapeutic window. So this is really assuring from a safety but also efficacy point of view. If we look at the competitive situation, nothing has really changed other than we are seeing a number of companies addressing the STK11 mutated population in frontline therapy by different immunotherapy approaches, but and BerGenBio remains the only one who have an excellent inhibitor in the frontline setting. So one could say that we are leading the effort, and we're probably the first one to recognize from a clinical point of view, this unmet medical need back in 2022.

So to summarize it all, STK11 is a significant unmet medical need. It's recognized that it's underserved and it requires different immuno-oncology approaches. We can now -- we know that AXL expression is a key driver of resistance to chemotherapy in STK11 mutated patients, but also to checkpoint inhibition. As I showed earlier, we can also see that 11 patients have a high incidence of low PD-L1 expression, meaning that they would not at least be viewed to respond to checkpoint inhibition. We have validated the efficacy of bemcentinib in 2 second-line non-small cell lung cancer studies. As I said before, in combination with chemotherapy, but also in combination with checkpoint inhibition. In this case, KEYTRUDA. We have shown monotherapy of bemcentinib, which is an important notion to keep in mind because this is most likely a success criteria for a new immunotherapy in a different setting though.

The ongoing study, the 16 study is progressing, and we now expect the first interim data to be released in the first part of 2025. And as I said, we are the only AXL inhibitor in tontine therapy for this population. On our pipeline update to , we specifically announced in '22 that we would not continue the development in term of tilvestamab back then to tilvestamab was in development for fibrotic diseases. We have been in an extensive partnering outreach process in the last almost 2 years. And unfortunately, we have concluded there is not an attractive patterning our partnership to be identified at attractive terms. And therefore, we have decided or the Board has decided yesterday evening. -- that all activities are to be discontinued, which means that we are dropping the program completely. The ADC 601 which is the antibody conjugate program, which contains an axle antibody from BerGenBio has been in a Phase Ia is now in a Phase FIB study.

And unfortunately, ADC Therapeutics has informed us that the therapeutic window for the program is too narrow, most likely due to toxicities and they have reassured us that there is no correlation between the toxicity that they have seen with the conjugate and the fact that they are using an AXL antibody, so this is, of course, reassuring for us, unfortunate for ADC Therapeutics. But none of these events will have any financial impact in in the outlook or the guidance as we have not included any of these in our future outlook. So BerGenBio today is probably just reiterating the focus of who we are. We are focusing -- we are focused on developing bemcentinib in lung cancer. We have our own program, which has been sense combined with standard of care in front-end therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. For patients with a mutation in the STK11 that's currently in a Phase IIa study. As I said, we expect the readout early next year or in the first part. But we also have another interesting program.

It's not fully under our control. but it's an interesting program from the fact that Dr. from the University of Texas and Antonio has published some quite groundbreaking -- the preclinical data on the combination of a statutory inhibitor in combination with an XL inhibitor. So we are in a 3-way partnership. I think I can say in a clinical study, Phase Ib study in second-line lung and the, where BerGenBio is providing pentane and Sobi, the Swedish pharmaceutical company is providing pacritinib and the study is fully funded by the NIH in the United States. And we expect the first patient in that study to be late this year or very early next year. If we then move into the financial overview, it's actually pretty much as we have guided. So around NOK 40 million on a quarterly basis, this third quarter, in particular, was somewhat lower, primarily linked to less sourcing of standard of care. So we buy them in box to have them at the sites. So there will be some variations on a quarter-to-quarter basis.

But I think it's reassuring that the guidance we have provided remains intact and our cash position of NOK 175 million almost is still projected to finance our operations under our going concern until -- into the third quarter of 2025. At which point, we have -- we are planning to complete the enrollment of all the patients in the Phase III study. If we look at -- if we are delivering what we are saying, I think we can say pretty much so in the second half of 2024, we have guided on a number of items to be delivered. So in the 16 study, the completion of the Phase Ib study, the report of the safety data, we have identified the second dose from the Phase Ib study to be initiated in the IA part. And we've also established a synthetic control arm Other news flow, the study that I just alluded to, led by Dr. Taverna has been initiated, but there's still no patients enrolled it start under our control, but we are very hopeful given the very interesting scientific hypothesis that patients will be identifying treated as soon as possible. we have updated on the outcome of our tilvestamab partnering efforts.

That brings the program to a full closure. And I also updated you previously on the ADC program that unfortunately means that they are discontinuing the program. We are still in the making of providing additional data on the mechanism of action, which will be from blood samples from the patients in the 16 study. So we believe we might still be able to deliver that this year. If we're looking into next year, now we are really a focused company. We believe that -- or we are targeting an update from the Phase IIa in the first part of 2025. There will probably be numerous interim analysis. This is an unblinded study. So at meaningful time points, we will be able to look at the data and communicate that to the market. But of course, we're also looking forward to complete the enrollment of the patients themselves. So in a nutshell, BerGenBio is a very focused company, focused on bemcentinib in lung cancer in 2 studies.

One is our own control, which is the 16 study, where we in the Phase Ib have shown acceptable safety but also that we are within the therapeutic window from a plasma point of view. The IIa study is ongoing, all the sites are activated and the collaboration with Tempus is expected to deliver a contextual benchmark as we analyze the data on an ongoing basis. And as I said, we expect to provide the first interim analysis in 2025. From a financial point of view, we are in the position we have guided on around NOK 175 million, which will fund the company's operation -- the planned operations into the third quarter of 2025. With that, I would actually like to hand over to our Chairman, Anders Tullgren, who will provide an update on the situation of the leadership in the company.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

Thank you very much, Martin, and good morning. So the company is very committed to deliver on the strategy and also the Board of Directors. We've had a very experienced and competent organization in place to execute on it, and all activities will continue as planned. I'm also very pleased to say that David Colpman, has been a new member of the Board of officers. He has a very strong international background in licensing and market and M&A and will bring a very good experience to the Board. As you know, Martin has decided to leave the company, and we are in an active search for a new CEO, and I hope to come back to you on that in due calls. What has been agreed with Martin is also that he will stay in place until we have the new CEO and for a transition period. So from the Board of Directors, it's a very clear message we will say with our strategy that Martin outlined, we will continue all and we have a very competent and experienced team to execute on this during the transition period when we have a new CEO in place. So with that, I think we conclude our presentation, and we will go over to the Q&A.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

So perhaps Rune, you want to ask the first question?

R
Rune Skeie
executive

Yes, we have a few questions. So you expect to present the interim data from the 16 in the first part 2. Can you give more specific guidance on that?

M
Martin Olin
executive

First half of 2025 is going to be in the earlier part of 2025, we cannot provide an exact date because we do not control the data readout and therefore, we cannot identify a specific date or month, but it's going to be in the first part of 2025.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

And when do you expect to present the complete data set from the Phase II part?

M
Martin Olin
executive

So hopefully, the patients will live as long as we can hope for. And that will tell you that the final readout of the study could actually be late in if you think about it this way. But it's data-driven. So in the protocol of the study, we have committed to file the patients for 2 years. for treating the patients for 2 years. So that's ultimately the final and -- or the time at which point we would analyze the data. And it cannot be more specific than that because we don't know until we have the data.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

And why was the work on tilvestamab discontinue?

M
Martin Olin
executive

So as I said, in 2022, as part of focusing the strategy on bemcentinib, we discontinued all internal efforts on to we believe at that time that there was potentially someone who would partner the asset and further develop it. not necessarily in fibrotic diseases in which we were developing it, but in potentially other indications. But unfortunately, we also have to accept that. That is not the case. At least I'm very glad that we retained bemcentinib because bemcentinib in our opinion, performs at least as good or even better compared to restart. So that's reassuring for ourselves.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

And a question about the new board member, David Colpman, so why was taken into the book.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

Yes. So David has a very long experience from several companies, both pharmaceutical and biotech companies in the business development and licensing. And that was a competence that we want to add to the Board, and he's also very recognized the national leader. So we are very pleased to have dated to the Board. And I think we have a very competent Board now that's actively working together with the management to ensure that we execute on our very focused strategy. So we're very pleased to add David to the Board.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

And then a question about why is the CEO Martin leaving or any specific reason? And will his departure impact the BGB activities.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

Perhaps you take the first part.

M
Martin Olin
executive

So I can take the first part. So I can reassure on that my site to leave the company is not connected to BerGenBio, but simply the fact that I have been presented with an opportunity that simply had to pursue and maybe I'm wrong. I don't think it has anything to do with BerGenBio doesn't have anything to do with BerGenBio actually. So it's a personal decision. And of course, I'm sorry that it has to be this way. at the same time.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

Yes. So I mean we're sorry to see Martin leaving, but I'm very confident. And as I said before and the team, we have a very committed team, which I've seen myself in the last couple of days and I'm actually -- also, as we said, it's the first priority for me is to find a new CEO and coming back on that. So we will come back on that shortly. And of course, a key priority for me is to ensure that we get a new CEO as soon as possible. And I'm also very pleased to having Martin staying until that's happening and for a transition period. So there is nothing that which slowed down our activities. There is nothing that will change our strategy. We are fully focused on delivering this opportunity for patients, which have -- where there is a very high unmet medical need as well for these STK11 patients. So nothing else really changed there.

M
Martin Olin
executive

No. And I think it's important for me to make sure that everyone understands that there is no disagreement between me, the management or the board part of the reason on our decision to resign.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

Is the question about disappointment about limited news flow between quarterly updates. Can you explain why?

M
Martin Olin
executive

It's like that when you are in a clinical study that's kind of the only program we are running ourselves. But no news is not necessarily bad news. The reality here is that it's data driven, and we just need to have enough patients being exposed to the drug for a long enough time before it's relevant to make our own analysis which is the basis for communicating to the market. So I realize, and I get it, it's maybe not what you want, but this is the reality of running a clinical study where the readouts are quite long in oncology compared to some other indications. So the waiting time is a little unwanted, but necessary.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

Any plans to change the communication strategy.

M
Martin Olin
executive

No, I think where our communication strategy is hopefully very received as being very transparent, open and direct we always want to inform the market on relevant and important information. We are not providing what I call smokescreen information just to provide information. We are providing information that is relevant for the shareholders, hopefully at an appropriate time. But I get it, it's not I wish we could announce the data much sooner, but the reality is that we have to wait for the data to mature.

R
Rune Skeie
executive

Thank you, Martin. Thank you, Anders that complete questions. Thank you.

M
Martin Olin
executive

Thank you very much.

A
Anders Tullgren
executive

Thanks.