Citycon Oyj
OMXH:CTY1S
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
|
US |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
Machinery
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
3.472
5.38
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
US | |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US | |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Citycon's Q1 2020 Results Audiocast. We have today published our Q1 2020 interim report. This can be found from our web page under Investors section. My name is Laura Jauhiainen, and I'm the new Head of Investor Relations at Citycon. I'm here with our CEO, Mr. Scott Ball; and our CFO and Executive Vice President, Eero Sihvonen. Scott will start today's audiocast with a brief overview of the quarter. He will also discuss the recent events around the COVID-19 outbreak and the implications on Citycon. This will be then followed by Eero's financial overview. Scott will conclude today's presentation with a few remarks of our priorities going forward. And as usual, you will have a chance to ask questions after the presentation. So there will be a separate Q&A session once the gentlemen have finished. Scott, please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. First, I'd like to welcome Laura to her first Citycon quarterly call. She's our new and improved [ MECO ], if you will. I'm pleased to present our Q1 results, which show that despite the recent events, our results were still solid for the quarter. I'll go -- as Laura mentioned, I'll go through a short summary of Q1 and the key highlights of the quarter. I'll discuss the situation with COVID-19 and its impact on our business. This will be followed by a more comprehensive financial overview by Eero. I will conclude today's audiocast with a few remarks on the operational actions taken as well. To put it mildly, March was a month of unexpected events, and I'm pleased with our results for the quarter. I'm sorry, there's some background noise there.At comparable rates, our net rental income increased by 0.3% and amounted to EUR 52.4 million, like-for-like NRI increased by 0.7%. Weak currencies and property valuations, however, burdened the result. Our occupancy rate remained at a good level of 94.5%. Tenant sales and footfall slightly declined, but we're still close to previous year level.During the quarter, we completed the acquisition of Sektor Portefølje II AS, a portfolio of 3 shopping centers in Norway. In connection with the transaction, we successfully divested 1 of the 3 assets marketed at a price higher than the acquisition cost.While Q1 was operationally a solid quarter, the impact of COVID-19 started to show in the latter half of March when government restrictions were gradually implemented in our operating countries. Management's focus has been on securing the continuance of our operations and availability of the critical services such as groceries, pharmacies and social services we provide at our premises. Our infrastructure has allowed us to work and run the operations efficiently from remote locations and safety of our customers, tenants and employees remains our top priority. Additionally, our conservative financing strategy and strong liquidity give financial strength and flexibility. At the end of Q1, our cash stood at EUR 124 million, and we had EUR 350 million of unused credit facility and our LTV stood at 45.7%. During these unusual times, our strategy brings stability. And let me just take a minute to remind you of our strategy. As you've heard us talk about in the past, 85% of our locations are located in the top 2 cities in each of the countries we operate in. So we're in the capital cities and the second-largest cities. We focus on urban hubs, and we merchandise our shopping centers towards the necessity-based goods. Those goods include groceries, liquor, pharmaceutical, municipal services, health care. Over 30% of our net rental income comes from necessity-based tenants. This balances fluctuation of retail demand. Public sector tenants that provide critical services to our citizens are a growing part of our business, as we've discussed previously. As mentioned, our conservative financing strategy gives strength and flexibility. Our financing is mainly based on unsecured debt with long maturities. Our high proportion of unencumbered assets gives us flexibility to consider secured loans options. Additionally, the ECB has announced a EUR 750 million -- billion -- excuse me, EUR 750 billion bond purchase program. Citycon's eligible for these bond purchases, which Eero will discuss a bit later. We see that our long-term strategy to focus on urban community hubs remains highly relevant. Having retail public and private services as well as entertainment under one accessible location provides a unique competitive advantage for us. Having centers located in transportation hub supports the natural customer flow and accessibility of our services. We believe that this long-term strategy supports our position in the future when our tenants are implementing their omnichannel strategies. Because of near term uncertainty, we have withdrawn our guidance for 2020. Taking a global perspective, Nordic countries are well positioned to come through the COVID-19 crisis. In the Nordics, governments are proactively engaged with preserving the economic viability of business. The economic support both provides support for our tenant's ability to pay rents as well as consumer purchasing power. In general, mobility restrictions are looser compared to Western Europe. We have been able to keep our shopping centers open with certain adjustments to operating hours. In Sweden, the government has announced a significant relief program, that consists of both the direct business subsidies and company loans. Additionally a rent relief program that would partially cover cost of rental reliefs has been announced. In Norway, the government has announced a significant relief program that would cover up to 90% of fixed cost under -- tenants fixed costs under certain conditions. Implementation of this package has already started. In Finland, more forms of support have recently been announced by the government and while they may be less than Norway and Sweden, they've indicated that further discussions are underway. We are reviewing any request for rent relief on a case-by-case basis, keeping in mind the government assistance, as I've just announced. Switching back to our portfolio operating metrics, and as mentioned, like-for-like net rental income increased when measured at comparable rates. Weak exchange rates negatively affected the total net rental income. Total tenant sales increased, while like-for-like tenant sales and footfall were slightly impacted by COVID-19 in the last half of March. As already noted, our occupancy at our shopping centers remained good at 94.5%. Average rent at comparable exchange rates was also stable. Leasing spreads slightly declined driven by renewals in Finland, while in Sweden and Estonia leasing spreads were positive. As described, we have a balanced tenant mix with over 30% of our revenues generated from necessity tenants. These include grocery, pharmacy, health care, social services. In addition to supporting our long-term strategy and serving as a competitive advantage to attract customers, this gives stability during these unusual times. It should be noted that a very small portion of our rent is turnover based. Compared to our peers, our occupancy cost ratio demonstrates our tenant profitability and supports our position and attractiveness to current and future tenant customers. I will now hand this over to Eero, who can go through the financials in Q1 in more detail.
Thank you, Scott, and good morning, everybody. As Scott mentioned, Q1 was operationally a good solid quarter, and the COVID pandemic only started to impact our numbers from mid-March onwards. So actually, we had a 2.5 very solid months behind us. And actually, the impact of foreign exchange was larger to our numbers than COVID actually, particularly, when we are talking about income statement. So net rental income ended up for the quarter at EUR 52.4 million, and that was reduced by EUR 1.6 million due to the low Swedish krona and particularly the weaker Norwegian krona. So at the comparable exchange rates, actually, our net rental income was higher than last year. On EPRA earnings level, we had EPRA earnings of EUR 34.8 million, which was 2.8% below last year's level. But again, here, approximately EUR 1.4 million was the impact of weaker currencies. And behind the ERPA operating or EPRA earnings, basically, we had the net rental income, as mentioned. Finance cost was lower than last year by approximately EUR 1.5 million due to the refinancings that we did last year. Joint ventures were lower particularly to some extent due to the fact that we bought out the SP2 properties that Scott already mentioned, and they were accounted for under joint ventures, also the taxes were slightly higher than last year. But anyway, EPRA earnings on a comparable FX basis, as mentioned, were higher than last year. The adjusted EPRA earnings, which was EUR 30.8 million includes the recent hybrid bond coupons and fees. And this is the additional disclosure that we have started to give. Then turning over to the impact of weaker NOK and SEK. The graph, you can see that particularly, Norwegian krona was substantially weaker. Actually, the reason of the weakness of Norwegian krona was the low oil price, most probably more than anything else. Fortunately, it's somewhat strengthened since the deepest lows, but anyway, ended up like close to 20% below end of the last year level.Then looking at the net rental income, income bridge and the components of our net rental income, what were the gains and the negative developments. So the acquisition of so-called SP2 properties, Stovner and Torvbyen in Norway, increased net rental income by EUR 1.7 million. Previous years, disposals of noncore properties, due -- and Arabia, in Finland reduced net rental income by EUR 1.2 million and the impact of foreign exchange was EUR 1.6 million on the net rental income.Then turning over to another important topic, fair value changes. And our fair value changes, behind them is the valuation advisory from our appraisers, our appraisers in Finland and Sweden were JLL; in Norway, Estonia and Denmark, CBRE. And additionally, CBRE made a full valuation on the newly acquired Torvbyen and Stovner, so they are included in the valuation now as well. And for most of the other properties, excluding -- so Kista and Lippulaiva, we also fully valued, but all of the other properties, we received valuation advisory. And this valuation advisory includes very conservative COVID assumptions, essentially 3 months rent-free for nonessential tenants in -- across all countries, and that was the main source of the negative. On the other hand, we had a gain of the recently acquired sector assets at EUR 35.7 million, so this compensates for the negative and actually the full quarterly fair value loss was, therefore, on our IFRS numbers, EUR 11.8 million, i.e. reasonably mild number, despite the fact that we took already very conservative assumptions and feel that the valuations are very proper. And you can see that also the cap rate slightly widened. Then turning over to the net asset value development, NAV development. So also here, you can see that the translation reserve, which has to do with foreign equity, the translation of foreign equity, which we have in Norway and Sweden created a negative difference of 0.78. And in euro, it corresponds to EUR 139 million approximately and about EUR 118 million relates to Norway and about EUR 20 million to Sweden. And with a stable FX, actually, our NAV would have been EUR 12.14. So the impact of NAV was particularly coming from the weakness of NOK and SEK, which, of course, we hope that will be reversed soon. Then turning over to main financing targets. Here, we were mainly or essentially in line with our own targets. And I would like to highlight that our financing is still mainly unsecured, i.e., more than 90% is unsecured. Meaning that we have a very large untapped pool of financing, i.e., we have not raised essentially -- or we have raised very little secured financing so far and have a very large remaining untapped pool.We had EUR 120 million of cash at the quarter end, and this had to do with some early drawdown from our revolving credit facility, basically to secure the possible repayment of commercial papers. And we still had a very substantial liquidity buffer. Like Scott mentioned, we had drawn EUR 150 million from our EUR 500 million revolver but still had like more than EUR 500 million of liquidity buffer, consisting of cash and committed unutilized credit facilities. Our loan-to-value was 45.7%, the IFRS loan-to-value that is, and it increased somewhat from Q4 2019. And again, much of that had to do with the weakness of Norwegian krona and SEK, like a good 1.5 percentage units have to do with that. And then the remaining like 1.4, 1.5 percentage points had to do with the fact that the 2 assets -- or actually, initially 3 assets in Norway were acquired and some debt with that. Then turning now to the cost of debt. We -- as mentioned, we have substantial available liquidity. And again, as mentioned, we already did draw EUR 120 million in cash. We also had EUR 127 million of commercial paper outstanding. The commercial paper markets have started gradually to function, and they were closed for 2 or 3 weeks nearly entirely. But the recent signs and issuance have been somewhat quite encouraging, I would say, and we have recently been able to continue to some extent, issuing commercial papers. The interest-bearing debt of EUR 2.034 billion includes also EUR 109 million of SP2-related loan, which you will be -- you will see also in the maturity structure and EUR 150 million drawdown from the revolver. And as Scott rightly mentioned, if in case, we would issue any new bonds, euro bonds, particularly, they would be easily be eligible, i.e. the European Central Bank could under their purchase program also participate in our bond issuance which is, of course, a huge benefit. Relating to the outlook, as mentioned earlier, we did withdraw our guidance. And therefore, I will be very brief in this respect, i.e., the guidance will not be -- the outlook will not be discussed at this point. And naturally, we hope that we will be able to come back to outlook soon, as soon as the outlook we'll see easier to forecast. But with this, back to Scott.
Thanks, Eero. I'd like to continue with a short update on our key development project, Lippulaiva. And then give you a few examples of actions we're taking to support our tenants during the COVID-19 crisis. As we previously indicated, we have suspended all uncommitted CapEx at this point, pleased that we've been able to carry on our development project in Lippulaiva. And the construction is progressing as planned. It hasn't been slowed down at all with COVID, which is a pleasant surprise for us. We're very happy and pleased with that. I would also remind Lippulaiva is a prime example of the strategy that we have going forward with a significant residential component as part of it. And the appeal of our mixed-use centers was once again demonstrated in April when Espoo City Library agreed on a lease contract with us at Lippulaiva. The library will be located up on the third level. Finally, to conclude today's presentation, just to give you some examples of things we're doing with our tenants and other stakeholders during the crisis. We are together with our tenants developing solutions that would help their business. We've already engaged with tens of local shopping centers-specific activities and plans to continue this work. This is, by example, includes delivery of food and medicines to risk groups, special arrangements for sharing up-to-date information on social media, arranging drive-in cinema in one of our shopping centers. We've focused on moving away from traffic-generating events to things that really speak to the community and touch people. We have a program in some of our shopping centers where we have set up a specific wall with hooks, where you can leave a coat that you want to donate. And if you are in need of a coat, you can pick up a coat. There's a lot of things like that, that we're doing kind of across the portfolio. And I would also say that we are, as a company, we have had our crisis management team in place for actually a couple of months now. And we have also developed our strategy team for how we operate in a post COVID environment and are working on plans and programs related to when restrictions lift. Certainly, these are very difficult times, and I don't want to understate the impact on our business. However, I think I would be remiss if I just didn't say that I think we, as a company, are fortunate that we're operating in countries, first of all, that have less restrictions. Secondly, that these government assistance programs should help protect and preserve much of our rent. And we have a portfolio of shopping centers that have a merchandise mix that should be a bit more insulated from the impacts of all of this. I'm very proud of our management team here, and how they've operated in this environment. And I think we are well positioned to come through this crisis and be even stronger and better on the other side.So with that, thank you for your time, and I'll hand it back over to Laura.
Thank you, Scott and Eero, for the presentation. And now we have time for questions, and we will turn the audio line on.
[Operator Instructions] We have a question from the line of Anssi Kiviniemi from SEB.
It's Anssi from SEB. A couple of questions from my side. Kicking off with fair value changes. The negative figure was lower than in Q4, even if you kind of cleared it out, and it seems that the cap rates and cash flow assumptions have not so much been touched. So could you please elaborate a little bit on how the discussions have gone with appraisers? And it seems that the long-term assumptions for the business and the assets, they are quite intact. So which are the factors that are supporting this, even though kind of we are living in a different world currently? That's the first one.
Okay. Eero, you want to start, then I'll jump in.
Yes, let's do that. And we will a little bit have to switch because we are in different locations that's why we communicate here while we speak. But basically, all of the appraisers we have been speaking to think that COVID is a short-term crisis. And as a short-term crisis it needs to be treated as such also in valuations. And like mentioned, the main impact of COVID has been limited to the short-term cash flows. And we have taken, in our opinion, as urged by the appraisers, now assumptions which are more than enough in terms of being conservative. And we think that -- and of course, the overall uncertainty, additionally, has been taken into account as part of the wider cap rates. So you will see that our cap rates are -- when rounded, the average cap rate was now 5.4, and it was 5.3 previous quarter. The real change was not exactly 10 basis points, it had to do with some roundings. But main impact, which we think that follows the international practice as well is the short-term cash flows. But apart from that, the position of our centers and the operation of our centers fundamentally long-term has not that much changed.
Yes. Anssi, if I could add. First of all, Anssi, I think we should have a rule during COVID that anybody who asked a question has to tell us if they're still in their pajamas or not. But to answer your question or just to piggyback on what Eero said, I think that 3 months free rent is extremely conservative. And particularly with our portfolio, when you look at, you say, Norway, 90% of tenants fixed expenses are being covered by the government which would include rent. In Sweden, as you know, there's a program for landlords who provide rent relief where they can recoup 50% of that back. And I don't think we're in a position where we're going to be giving every tenant free rent for 3 months. So I think the assumptions by the appraisers are more conservative than I would have otherwise have expected. But we want to have an accepted debt in these valuations just because there is some unknown with it. But again, I don't see us being in a position where we're going to have to provide that level of rent relief.
Great. Then I just want to clarify that I'm not in my pajamas currently. So I'm okay on that side. Second question, I mean, the footfall declined 9% on like-for-like basis, the tenant sales declined 6% and kind of the COVID impacted basically half a month of your operations, that's how you stated in the financial statement at least. Does this give a good indication of Q2 net rental income trend? Or do you expect to see more stable trend or more drastic changes? How should we read on this?
Yes. I think that -- listen, I think footfall and sales, obviously, are going to be significantly down in April. I think you're probably -- I think we're in the range right now through this part of the month where it's fairly significant. Probably depending on the country. Sweden, as you know, is much more relaxed. And so we're not seeing as dramatic a drop in footfall here. In the countries where it's a little bit more restrictive, we've seen a little bit bigger drop. But I don't think that translates -- normally, I would say, footfall and sales will translate into NRI. But because this is a short-term impact compressed in a few months, hopefully, I don't think that's going to be the case here. And again, as mentioned previously, on the NRI, there's these government programs, which will help offset any relief that we give at this point. So I'm not expecting that, that will translate kind of on a like-for-like basis to an impact on NRI.
Okay. Then we have seen bunch of bankruptcies in retail segment, especially in Sweden, MQ, et cetera. Do you have any exposure to these names? Could you elaborate a bit on that?
Yes. We have 6 stores with MQ. It's -- I think on an annual basis, it's about EUR 900,000 of revenue, that's in euros, I'm sorry. And then we have 1 issue with Filmstaden where we're renegotiating the lease. But I think that's -- those are kind of the big ones for us. We do have -- we had some exposure in Norway where the parent for Intersport filed bankruptcy, so we have some exposure there. But that's it. I mean, we're not -- again, I think if you look at our tenant mix, we have less exposure in the Fashion segment. And so we haven't felt the impact of these bankruptcies quite as much as you might have thought.
And maybe just to add, you will see or you have seen that in our Q1 numbers, we have increased our credit loss provisions, and we continue to have conservative provisioning against any possible credit losses and the credit losses were now approximately EUR 1 million when they -- for the quarter when they were EUR 400,000 1 year ago. So they have increased but are still at a very short or moderate level.
Then my last question is on CapEx. You highlighted you are withdrawing everything that is non committed. So basically, could you give us an indication for 2020 CapEx level? And how much you can take money out of the table?
Eero, do you have that?
No. I don't think that we are disclosing the actual CapEx levels. I don't think that we have done that before. But like Scott mentioned, Lippulaiva is a priority. And there, we will continue pretty much as we expected, might be slightly lower than we originally anticipated but not by much. Then TIs and maintenance investments, we have been traditionally spending approximately EUR 15 million, EUR 15 million to EUR 20 million for each on a yearly basis. So there, we are looking very tightly case by case. But on the other hand, there might be accretive TI investments, which we certainly don't want to postpone because those are driving venues and this is something. But when it comes to maintenance, of course, if it's non urgent, we are looking into that. And there are savings. Like mentioned, and it doesn't only have to do with CapEx, so we are looking at possibilities to cut SG&A, operating expenses. And as you see, our operating expenses already were substantially down from last year, partially, of course, supported by the mild winter, but we have a very tight cost control in the -- going on.
The next question comes from the line of Simen Mortensen from DNB Markets.
I'm neither in my pajamas and so and to clarify that as well. To ask you guys a question as well, not your pajamas, but in terms of how has rental payments been in -- at the end of the quarter. And the prepayment of rent, particularly for Q2, and which sector has paid, which sector has not been able to pay? And can you give us some clarification on how -- because we've seen other names have been struggling to get rent in, that's my first question.
Yes. I think at the end of March, I think our rent collection was about 95%, so remained relatively healthy at the end of March. Now again, full impact of COVID had not hit yet, but tenants were beginning to feel that impact. And so I think that some tenants in the countries where there is government subsidies, are delaying their rent payment while they make application for those government subsidies. So we've had conversations with them, and that's the case. But again, to answer your question directly on the end of the quarter it was 95%. I think that's right, Eero.
Approximately there.
And normal level, what would that be for you?
Well, I think that this is, of course, a normal level. The optimal level would be 100%, and this was slightly below 100% but the slight delay has to do with the fact that Scott mentioned that still -- already some tenants were busy filling their applications. And of course, some of them were already feeling the pain. But we have reserved appropriately for anything that we feel is serious. And for Q2, of course, the amounts will be lower, but it doesn't seem that it would be anything too dramatic or too drastic. We don't have yet all collection dates behind us even for April. So we don't have exact stats but money is coming in as a whole.
Okay. And my question -- second question will be on the occupancy rate. We can see that the vacancies are going up year-on-year and Q-on-Q. My question is, how many of that spike is due to the bankruptcies we have seen in the market, and how is that impacting the figures? And what can you say about the difference between the countries? I guess we see, and especially in Norway, where you have your occupancy going up almost 300 basis points year-on-year or down, sorry.
Yes. The occupancy rate in Norway was tied to a couple of things. One, was there was a bankruptcy for Intersport, which is a large tenant that we have in some of our shopping centers, so that was a portion of it. And then another portion of it was more administrative as we implemented a new software program and reconciled some of our square footages or square meters in the shopping centers, it is basically kind of tying it all together. I would say that overall, we aren't seeing dramatic movement in occupancy. Now I'm just going to be Pollyannaish. I think post COVID, there could be some fallout. But we're not -- I think we'll have less in the countries that we operate in. Again, I come from the U.S. where there's -- you don't have the kind of government assistance that is being provided here in these Nordic countries. And I think we're going to see the benefit of that policy as it relates to these countries opening back up and businesses being able to open back up and have some solid footing underneath them. So I'm -- as I mentioned before, really, really happy that we're operating in these countries because I don't think we're going to see the kind of fallout that you will see in other countries where there's not this kind of support from the government.
And my last question is, there's been a very mild Nordic winter. How has that impacted your figures and costs this quarter?
Yes. It's helped the cost quite a bit. Eero, maybe add some more detail on the exact. But it has helped our business, as Eero mentioned previously. The good news, bad news, it helps you on your cost, but it doesn't help your fashion tenants necessarily as they try to sell winter goods. Again, thankfully for us, fashion is a smaller piece of our portfolio than -- compared to our peers. So we felt some of it in the sales, but not as dramatic as maybe some others. Eero, I don't know if there's anything else you want to add to that?
Yes, exactly. If you look at our gross rental income, our gross rental income was down 2.6%, largely due to the FX. But if you look at our property operating expenses, they were down by 8.4%. So the main reason or 2 main reasons, our savings initiatives; and number two, the mild winter. So the mild winter had to do with less snow removal expenses in a bad winter. So bad or snowy winter we mean that we could spend like EUR 1 million or EUR 2 million extra for snow removal costs. And this year, it was very close to EUR 0. And then, of course, heating costs are less. We normally get like 75% of those approximately back from the tenants. So it's not like we gain 100%, but anyway, if operating expenses are down due to mild winter, it, of course, improves our overall bottom line.
And Simen, I should point out, I am in my pajamas, by the way.
[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from the line of Niko Levikari.
You mispronounced it a bit, but that's fine. Okay. So I have a couple of follow-up questions. Based on the results, regarding rent deferrals, what has been agreed so far with the tenants where you've agreed to take some rent deferrals? Regarding the rent payments, will they be done later this year? Or what sort of arrangements have you done so far?
Yes. So any deferrals done thus far have included a payment program where that rent would be repaid by the end of this year so it's -- that's the program in place today.
Second question. We've seen across, let's say, the Central European market quite widespread use of material uncertainty clauses. I went through the appraisal report that you posted, but they didn't mention anything about that. So have, let's say, JLL and CBRE used these clauses also with fiscal appraisals?
We're not going to...
Which clauses? You got this, Euro.
Yes, good. Yes, so I'm not sure if we heard very well because there was something on the line here. But I think that the CBRE and JLL are using the same provisions and same assumptions for us as they are using European wide, at least that's what they tell us. And they also make a general health warning saying that during these times of uncertainty, one should exercise even more caution than normal to the valuations. And I think that they make some other like cautious statements. But apart from that, the main assumptions, like mentioned, has been the 3 months rent-free plus somewhat reduced specialty leasing assumptions plus some assumptions regarding reletting and stuff like that. But by far, the biggest is -- biggest relates to 3 months rent-free assumption.
Okay. That's clear. Next question regarding the rent collections for Q2. Of the ones that were due at the beginning of April, let's say, first, how much have you managed to collect so far? If you can give some sort of rough estimate?
Well, we have not normally sort of published such numbers in anticipation because that relates to Q2, and this is not like public information. But as Scott and myself just pointed out, the money keeps coming in and that maybe and probably will be less than this 95% that we recorded for March. But we are hopeful that anyway and trust that, that will be a sizable number, and there are no indications that there would be like very, very large deferrals. And of course, in all countries, the government programs are now kicking in. And in Norway, the tenants will have access to up to 90% subsidy and in Sweden, we are talking about at least 50% and even the numbers in Finland are increasing by the week. So the final numbers are not known, but we are cautiously optimistic.
Okay. And the last question from my line is regarding the densification plans. Is there any update on that? Or can we expect more in the H1 results regarding the plans?
I think you -- again, the firstly the line is not very clear, but I think you asked about the densification plan. We are -- I'm sorry, there's a lot of feedback. I apologize. Hopefully, you're not hearing it as well. We are continuing the zoning planning process across a large piece of the portfolio. I think in our next investor presentation, which we are working on as we speak, we will provide more details around where we're at in each of the assets. So we'll give you asset-specific information. We anticipate having this investor presentation done over the next couple of weeks here. So happy to share more of this with you as we finish this up. But we are progressing. And I would say the other thing, I guess, I should talk about is the fact that we are suspending CapEx where it's not committed. But a lot of what we're talking about in these densification plans is getting zoning and permitting, and that is not a big CapEx spend. It's more of a time and personnel expense, which we have not slowed down on. We're continuing to push and press on that because we do believe there's value creation there even without spending much CapEx just by simply getting those zoning rights.
Next question comes from the line of Rob Virdee from Green Street Advisors.
I was a little bit late on the call. So just -- I'm not sure if I missed it, but could you give us some color into how your retailer sales developed in March, and particularly the third and fourth week after the COVID-19 lockdowns? So that's for retailer sales and also for footfall, first of all.
Yes. I don't have the weekly breakdown on sales. We can get that over to you, Rob. As it relates to footfall, I would say that we went from the second week to the third week. And again, I -- it's interesting, what happened was, it dropped pretty significantly when all these measures were first announced and then slowly started climbing back up. And it's going to vary country-by-country as you probably are aware, Sweden has been much more relaxed as it relates to restrictions. So in most of Sweden, the drop-off hasn't been that significant. I would say that we saw a drop-off at Kista, primarily because of people who are working from home. As you know, Kista sits in the middle of a very densely office population, and that accounts for a lot of our daytime traffic. That daytime traffic has dwindled. However, the evening and weekend traffic, which is more local, has stayed relatively consistent. Norway is where we probably saw the biggest drop at the end of March because they had the greatest restrictions at that point. There, I think it was probably in a range of like 40% in terms of footfall. Again, I don't have the sales numbers in front of me. And then in Finland, it was somewhere in between. So it kind of varies. It's all over the board, again, depending on country. But since you were late to the call, as mentioned previously, normally, I would be an advocate for saying, you should think about footfall and sales directionally in terms of what it means for your ability to push rents. However because this is not a drop that is going to be long term, we don't think. I don't think you can make that same kind of correlation. I think this is kind of a momentary dip. And in fact, Norway is already -- they're starting to reopen much of the country. So I think it's a momentary dip and not something that translates into kind of longer-term impact on rent.And also, as mentioned previously, I know in many countries, that short-term dip can have long-term implications because you have tenants who have a hard time surviving during that short-term dip. We're fortunate that we're operating in countries with a fair amount of government assisted -- a lot of, actually, government assistance, particularly, compared to other countries. So I think our tenants will have the ability to rebound more consistently across the board in these countries than it will in other countries.
Okay. That's clear. Scott. The second question comes to rents. I did hear some of the answers you've given on rent for Q2. Question is, often they are paid quarterly in advance. Have you changed those terms now? Is it monthly in a raise? Or is it just case-by-case for every tenant?
Well, in some of the countries, it has already been like a monthly payments and in -- particularly in Finland, monthly payment is the norm. And in the Sweden, actually, it's either monthly or quarterly, and we are now mostly in -- turned to monthly in Sweden. In Norway, the market practice is quarterly. So basically, quarterly in advance, and now it's mostly monthly in advance. And this is also to make the collection easier and make tenants' lives easier, so this is what we have done.
There are no further questions registered. So I hand back to the speakers for any closing remarks.
I just want to say thank you to everybody, and I hope everybody stays safe and healthy. Laura, I don't know, if you want to close the call.
Okay. So also from my behalf, thank you for all your questions. And if there are any further questions, please reach out to me or Eero. And well, thanks for attending the call, and have a great day.