Simon Property Group Inc
NYSE:SPG
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
120.84
182.43
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q3-2024 Analysis
Simon Property Group Inc
In the third quarter of 2024, Simon Property Group showcased impressive financial progress, with real estate funds from operations (FFO) rising to $3.05 per share, a 4.8% increase year-over-year from $2.91. This performance was driven by a remarkable 3% rise in lease income. The company reported $1.07 billion in FFO for Q3, translating to $2.84 per share compared to $1.2 billion or $3.20 per share a year prior. The dip in per share earnings was largely attributed to a noncash loss related to the company's investment in Klepierre, which saw a notable stock price appreciation of 18% during the quarter, enhancing the market value of Simon's investment by approximately $400 million.
Simon Property Group's occupancy rate hit 96.2% across malls and outlets, marking a 1% increase from the previous year. The Mills occupancy was even higher at 98.6%. In Q3, the company signed around 1,200 leases covering approximately 4 million square feet, with a larger trend seen over the first nine months of 2024, where more than 3,900 leases for 15 million square feet are projected to yield over $1 billion in revenue. Importantly, the average base minimum rent rose by 2.3% for malls and outlets and 4.5% for Mills year-over-year.
Looking ahead, Simon Property Group has provided a positive outlook. The company reaffirms its 2024 guidance for FFO per share at $12.80 to $12.90, excluding specific noncash losses. Notably, the company's performance in real estate has significantly bolstered this guidance, compensating for anticipated lower contributions from other platform investments. The company expects the momentum in net operating income (NOI) to continue, especially fueled by significant upcoming projects slated for 2025 onward, despite anticipated economic challenges.
Simon Property Group's development and redevelopment pipeline stands at around $1.3 billion, yielding an impressive blended return of 8%. The company has ambitious plans, committing to approximately $1.5 billion in investments annually for the next few years, aimed at enhancing both commercial and residential offerings. Noteworthy redevelopment projects are already underway, including a significant $500 million redevelopment at Fashion Valley, emphasizing the company's strategy to improve and adapt its assets amid evolving market demands.
In a demonstration of financial confidence, Simon raised its quarterly dividend to $2.10 per share, representing a 10.5% year-over-year increase and marking the fourth consecutive quarter of dividend growth. This dividend, now at a pre-pandemic high, underscores the company’s robust cash flow and commitment to returning value to shareholders despite the volatility experienced over the past few years.
Despite the strong performance in its core operations, Simon Property Group noted challenges within its SPARC businesses, reflecting lower consumer spending among lower-income demographics. This division's outlook is cautiously optimistic, with signs of improvement in sequential sales for brands like Forever 21 and Reebok as they brace for the busy holiday season. The anticipated minor losses from SPARC are projected to dampen overall FFO contributions, but management remains hopeful for stabilization and growth moving forward.
The company is keen on pursuing mixed-use developments that enhance its existing retail properties. With a significant focus on residential projects alongside commercial ambitions, Simon’s total pipeline includes about $4 billion, with one-third stemming from potential residential initiatives. This strategy not only aims to optimize existing retail space but also to integrate residential living with commercial activity, thus capturing a broader demographic and generating additional revenue streams.
Greetings, and welcome to the Simon Property Group Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Tom Ward, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, Tom. You may begin.
Thank you, Paul. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. Presenting on today's call are David Simon, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President; and Brian McDade, Chief Financial Officer.
A quick reminder that statements made during this call may be deemed forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and actual results may differ materially due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. We refer you to today's press release and our SEC filings for a detailed discussion of the risk factors related to those forward-looking statements. Please note that this call includes information that may be accurate only as of today's date.
Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included within the press release and the supplemental information in today's Form 8-K filing. Both the press release and the supplemental information are available on our IR website at investors.simon.com. Our conference call this morning will be limited to 1 hour. For those who would like to participate in the question-and-answer session, we ask that you please respect our request to limit yourself to 1 question.
I am pleased to introduce David Simon.
Good morning, everybody, and I'm pleased with our financial and operational performance in the third quarter. We saw increased leasing volumes, occupancy gains, and total retail sales volumes. Demand for our space from a broad spectrum of tenants is strong and steady, and we continue to strengthen our unique retail real estate platform through our growing development and redevelopment pipeline. This, combined with our A-rated balance sheet, really sets us apart and allows us to focus on the future. We raised our dividend again to $2.10. We're now at our historical high overcoming the arbitrary, capricious closing of our real estate during COVID. We have a low payout ratio.
I now turn it over to Brian, who will cover our third quarter results and full year guidance in more detail. Brian?
Thank you, David, and good morning. Real estate FFO was $3.05 per share in the third quarter compared to $2.91 in the prior year, a 4.8% growth rate. Domestic and international operations had a very good quarter and contributed $0.15 of growth driven by a 3% increase in lease income. Third quarter funds from operations were $1.07 billion or $2.84 per share as compared to $1.2 billion or $3.20 per share last year. Third quarter results include $0.13 per share of noncash net loss in fair value adjustments from the mark-to-market on the Klepierre exchangeable bonds we issued in November of '23, which mature in November of 2026.
The noncash loss on derivative is due to the outperformance of Klepierre's stock price, which increased 18% during the third quarter as a result of the stock appreciation, the market value of our Klepierre investment increased by approximately $400 million during the third quarter. OPI was an $0.08 loss in the quarter due to reduced discretionary spending by the lower income consumer at 2 SPARC brands, and also from the loss of income from ABG in the prior year due to the sale of our interest earlier this year. As a reminder, the prior year results include $0.32 per share in noncash gains from the partial sale of our ownership in SPARC in the third quarter of '23.
Domestic NOI increased 5.4% year-over-year for the quarter due to continued leasing momentum, resilient consumer spending and operational excellence delivered the results exceeding our plan for the quarter. Portfolio NOI, which includes our international properties at constant currency, grew 5% for the quarter. Malls and outlet occupancy at the end of the third quarter was 96.2%, an increase of 1% compared to the prior year. The Mills occupancy was 98.6% at the end of the quarter. Average base minimum rent for the malls and outlets increased 2.3% year-over-year, and the Mills increased 4.5% year-over-year.
Leasing momentum continued across the portfolio. We signed approximately 1,200 leases or 4 million square feet in the quarter. Through the first 9 months of 2024, we have signed more than 3,900 leases for 15 million square feet which is expected to generate more than $1 billion of revenue. We have an additional 1,800 deals in our pipeline, including renewals for more than $600 million of revenue. We continue to see strong broad-based demand from the retail community, including continued strength for many categories. Reported retailer sales per square foot was $737 for the mall and premium outlets combined and was up approximately 1% year-over-year, excluding 2 retailers. Importantly, total sales volumes, excluding those same 2 retailers were up approximately 1.5% year-over-year. At the end of the quarter, our occupancy cost was 12.8%.
Turning to new development and redevelopment. We opened Tulsa Premium Outlets on August 15 at 100% leased and we also opened a significant expansion at Busan Premium Outlets in South Korea in September. At the end of the quarter, new development and redevelopment projects were underway across all platforms in the U.S. and internationally with our share of net cost of $1.3 billion at a blended yield of 8%.
Turning to other platform investments. Our OPI results for the third quarter at SPARC underperformed as the lower income consumer continues to be more cautious in their spending. We first highlighted the inflationary impact in the second half of 2022 relative to this consumer. Performance was below expectations at Forever 21 and Reebok. SPARC and JCPenney did, however, record sequential improvements in comp sales during the third quarter which sets these brands up well for the important upcoming holiday season. We are not sitting still, and we expect to have some positive announcements by year-end with respect to these businesses.
Turning to our balance sheet. During the quarter, we amended and extended our $3.5 billion supplemental revolving credit facility for 3 years on existing terms. We also issued $1 billion in senior notes with a term of 10 years and a 4.75% interest rate. This was clearly good timing on our part. During the first 9 months of the year, we completed refinancings of 14 property mortgages for a total of approximately $1.3 billion at an average rate of 6.13%. We ended the quarter with approximately $11.1 billion of liquidity. And at the end of the quarter -- subsequent to the end of the quarter, on October 1, we repaid our last remaining unsecured maturity for 2024 and of $900 million.
We constantly innovate in both our physical and digital worlds to create world-class convenience for our shoppers and drive incremental sales for our brand partners. In continuing this effort and building upon the success of Shop Premium Outlets, we rebranded our digital marketplace Shop Simon, to take advantage of all of our assets, including shopper e-mail list totaling over 25 million customers. The expanded and rebranded digital marketplace adds on sale and discounted merchandise while continuing to offer outlet products from leading brands. This is the next phase in our journey to create the ultimate omnichannel experience. We also launched a new nationwide marketing campaign, Meet Me at the Mall. The campaign celebrates the shopping malls continued cachet as the go-to destination for all generations.
Turning to our dividend. Today, we announced our dividend of $2.10 per share for the fourth quarter, a year-over-year increase of 10.5%. The dividend is payable on December 30. This is the fourth consecutive quarter we have increased our dividend, and the dividend is now back to our pre-pandemic record high. Finally, turning to guidance. We are affirming our guidance range of $12.80 to $12.90 per share, which excludes $0.14 per share year-to-date impact of the noncash loss and fair value adjustments from the mark-to-market on the Klepierre exchangeable bonds, which prior to the third quarter, it was only a $0.01 net noncash loss but is now $0.14 and needed to be highlighted.
With that, thank you for your time today. David and I are now available for your questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Steve Sakwa with Evercore ISI.
It sounds like you've got great momentum on the leasing front. And with the portfolio north of 96%. I'm just curious how you guys are attacking the lease exploration schedule over the next couple of years? And whether you feel like pricing power is moving materially in your favor just given the interplay with sales being a little bit flat, but obviously, there being strong demand for high-quality retail space?
Yes. Steve, I'll answer that simplistically, I guess. I would say that our job is to continue to improve the merchandise mix at our real estate. And so it's more than -- it's a lot more than just what rent you can charge. It's really what is the right retail -- retailer tenant, et cetera. What's the right mix for that property, and we take more of a holistic approach to how we remerchandise centers. We're still undergoing significant remerchandising across the portfolio because we're seeing better retailers. When I say retailers, it could be restaurants, et cetera. I'm using that as a generic term.
We're seeing a lot more interesting and better retailers that are interested in our portfolio. So we need to take advantage of that, and that's the focus. So obviously, supply and demand, I mean, construction costs are up 60% from prepandemic numbers, a pretty staggering number. And we're basically 1 of the few that can build and overcome that. So there is no real new supply, and that does put us in a positive light. But our job is to make the properties better and not just focus on the highest rent per square foot we can get.
So with that, we have a balanced approach. Obviously, we think we still have growth as leases expire or we bring in new tenants. But I don't -- I really don't like to term pricing power. I really don't like to focus on that. Just how do you continue to make the portfolio better is really the #1 focus for our team. We just literally had a 3-day marathon session. We go property by property with our leasing folks. We did the malls this week, we'll do the outlets and mills next week.
And if you participate in it, I think I offered somebody 1 time down the road to who was at Alex, probably, yes. Alex is the only guy that would want to sit through it. But if you sat through it, the primary focus is how do we make the property better. We still have work to do there. But I think at the end of the day, when you do that, you'll get the property growth that we're all looking for. So I would characterize it that way, Steve. The good news is supply and demand is in our favor. We have the capital to invest in our portfolio to make it better, overcome the unbelievable rise in construction costs when you think about it. And that's the focus.
Well, I'm free next week, if you want me to sit in on the meeting.
You're more than welcome. You get to choose outlets or mills, all right? Let Tom know.
Our next question is from Caitlin Burrows with Goldman Sachs.
David, you mentioned a growing development and redevelopment pipeline. I was wondering if you can go through like how deep this opportunity is for Simon's portfolio now considering all that you've already done. To what extent is there still potential for anchor replacement or other retail redevelopments and then also the larger mixed-use projects.
I think that continues, Caitlin, to be a huge focus for us. So I would -- our pipeline is probably around 4 billion right now. That doesn't mean we're going to do all of it. But we have massive mixed-use opportunities ahead of us. And we still don't have all the anchors redeveloped the way we want to. So we have opportunities like Barton Creek or down the line, if you look at kind of some of the Sears, Fashion Valley is a great opportunity where we're going to get the JCPenney space back and probably do about a $500 million redevelopment between retail and mixed use.
Our residential pipeline as an example of that is over $1 billion today and without including kind of the Fashion Valleys or the Barton Creeks of the world that we think could do residential. And we continue to see an interesting relationship between residential development adjacent or part of our existing retail format. They actually go hand in glove. It's very encouraging to see. I think if you listen to Don Wood, he'll tell you the same thing. So that is exciting. We're going full steam ahead. As you know, that supply, it's probably in certain markets been oversupplied, but the reality is nobody building now and if you think how we're looking at it, it's going to take 2 to 3 to 4 years.
And as we bring these on, there'll be no new supply, and I think that will put us in a -- and then advantageous situation. So long story short, say, $4 billion and roughly 1/3 of that is probably resi. Less 1/2 of -- but some of it like for instance, we just approved a deal, and I don't think it's in our 8-K. But we just approved a deal at Clearfork, which is in Fort Worth kind of a newer center, and we just approved to deal with our partner to build an office and retail in [ ground floor ]. The office is going to be I don't know if I can say it, but basically, we don't -- it's not big. It's, I don't know, 50,000 square feet and [ wells ] is going to take the majority of it. And so we'll still do smatterings of those kind of projects as we go forward. But building a big spec office I think out of our pipeline.
And just to confirm, I know in there, you were talking about retail office will not so much office on the multifamily, you mentioned at 1 point in their overbuilding. That was on the residential side, correct?
Correct.
Our next question is from Jeffrey Spector with Bank of America.
Maybe just following up on the first question topic, David, your comments on merchandising mix, maybe something else that is sometimes overlooked. I know you guys talked about the omnichannel experience and what you're doing there, Meet Me at the Mall. Can you expand a little bit on some of the key initiatives that the company is doing to, again, engage customers, bring them to the centers and how this may evolve over the next few years? I know, of course, this holiday season, you have some great programs.
So I would say, Jeff, that the mall continues to be a unique gathering place. And we get -- I think we all get too focused on whether it's enclosed, has a roof on it. I mean, it really -- to me, it really doesn't matter. It's kind of what is the best retail project in that trading area. And we believe that -- and if you talk to really new and exciting companies like a Shein or other skins or kind of the new wave of retailers/marketplace is, they all believe in our product. And so -- and we're seeing rejuvenation of the younger consumers wanting to hang out at the mall.
And I think it's our obligation, both for us and our investors, et cetera, and also for the retailers to really highlight that. Now we don't have unlimited budgets like the tech companies, right? But we try to do the best we can to reinforce that, hey, this is cool. Now at the same time, digital is important, right? So 14%, 15% of commerce is digital, and we think we can play in a role in that. We think the best way to do that is through Shop Simon. We made sure we had proof of concept before we put kind of our brand on it. If you remember, it started Shop Premium outlets.
We founded around until we partnered with Michael Rubin and RGG, we've created -- we hired some top-notch talent there. We're building our marketplace. We had proof of concept and then we decided to rebrand it under Shop Simon. So we do think, and then ultimately, this will add -- we'll hang out loyalty product on that, which will be important. And then ultimately, we have Simon Search, which will hang on that and we'll end up with shift from store, pick up at the mall, et cetera. So it's the flywheel is starting to fill itself out but in the meantime, we want to reaffirm the positive nature that our product means to the community, means to our retailers as we go on, and we can't ignore digital because let's face it, this is around that 14%, 15%, not growing the way it used to, but we have to assume it might. So we have to play in there.
And I think for Shop Simon we've got the right product or retailer relationships and faith they have in us gives me confidence. We have the right team, we have the right partner in RGG, I think, gives us confidence that we'll continue to create real value out of that platform, but it's not overnight. It takes time, takes investment, prudent investment, and that's what we're doing.
Our next question is from Craig Mailman with Citi.
Maybe just to follow up on the Shop Simon concept, David. As you guys are looking to remerchandise malls and there could be some more anchor fallout over time. I mean, is the idea here to hopefully get this up and running to where you guys can convert part of the mall to the last mile distribution and be able to bring in that logistics angle to your business to help your retailers and also be able to monetize it? Or am I reading a little bit too much into it?
I do think there is absolutely a role that we can play in search at your local store that happens to be in our center. And then maybe there's a distribution angle and certainly pick up in stores in angle that we can help facilitate with our retailers. Whether we'll build a mini distribution center on that. I mean we look at those things and there's possibilities of certain retailers or certain centers that we might be able to do a micro or mini distribution facility.
We're also looking at last mile in the power area because, obviously, that's going crazy and that there is -- our real estate is unbelievably well located, and it does -- it is not -- we're not out in the hinterlands and last mile is very important, and we usually have real estate that's [ A1A ]. So there's possibilities. It's not going to be dominant or whatever. It will be selective, but there are potential possibilities.
Our next question is from Greg McGinniss with Scotia Bank.
I guess congrats on the strong leasing quarter, crossing 96% in occupancy ahead of [Technical Difficulty] Or you're functionally full.
Well, look, I think we can still increase our occupancy, but also beyond occupancy, and I said earlier, which really -- we're really focused on merchandising. So -- and -- but we still have room to grow our occupancy, but more important is that they're bringing in the right tenants in the right center in the right location. That's a huge focus for us. But we still think we have plenty of opportunity to grow our occupancy.
Okay. And just 1 quick 1 on FFO per share guidance. Just trying to better understand the full year contribution from real estate as opposed to some of the noise [indiscernible] by other platform investments. Are you still anticipating around $0.00 from OPI or is that lower now and maybe offset by real estate performance?
Craig, it's Brian. I think we now think the OPI contribution is going to be a minus 5 to minus 10 for the year, but it's being offset by significant improvement in the real estate FFO explanation.
We expect it to improve in the fourth quarter for sure.
Right. But I guess, overall, I think my [ guess ] is that the real estate business guidance would be increase if it were stand-alone.
Yes. If we -- if OPI is -- you're breaking up, I don't know if it's our phone or yours, but OPI has been a drag this year from an FFO point of view. Now remember, we essentially have 4 assets in OPI, okay? We have our investment in RGG, we have our investment in Jamestown, we have our interest in SPARC and JCPenney. When you put it all together, we have positive EBITDA in those business of a meaningful amount. But again, when you own an interest in a retailer, you've got lots of depreciation, lots of expenses that end up hurting FFO, but not necessarily the EBITDA line.
So I just want everybody to put in that perspective. And again, I would also mention to you that our investment in both Penny and SPARC is de minimis at this point. We have a little bit more investment in RGG and Jamestown, but the size of our company is the right thing to [ note ]. So with that said, and Brian said in our call, well, we are still not standing still on our retail side, which is Penny and SPARC. And I do think we'll have some positive announcements with respect to those businesses near year-end or early '25. So we're working hard on that. But the bottom line is it has been a drag this year.
Part of that drag was because we told ABG so we lost that income that we thought that we -- when we gave you our budget, we weren't anticipating. We're extremely happy with that sale. So that was the right thing to do at the right time. And -- but so we tackle 1 opportunity. We're tackling the next. We view RGG and Jamestown as long-term investments at this point. Obviously, that can change, but we view those as long-term investments. And again. So -- and if you go back in history, which I think is important, when we got into the retail business, it was the right thing to do at that particular time.
We are less given today's time, it's probably not the right thing to do, and that's why we haven't done a retail investment in a few years -- 4 years. So we're smart, we get it, but we're focused in -- we have an investment that's worth something with no capital in it. So our job is to make it better, and that's what we're focused on. Diversion from what you wanted, but I figured I'd give you the full story.
Our next question is from Ron Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.
looks like we lost Ron.
Our next question is from Alexander Goldfarb with Piper Sandler.
And yes, I'll happy to coordinate with Tom and Steve on sitting in on 1 of those leasing sessions with you.
Well, we'll do it. You might -- you'll either be fully impressed or the detail might overwhelm you. So we'll see.
I look forward to being overwhelmed. So question, David, just getting back to the commentary on the 96% plus lease performance of the portfolio and the comments that you've made about the opportunity in the malls. As you look at the bottom tier, for a long time, you talked about the bottom 20% driving cash flow to reinvest in the top malls but given how competitive the retail environment has become lack of new supply, are you seeing new opportunities in your bottom 20% of malls that previously you would have just harvested for cash flow, but because of the changing landscape, you now see opportunities that didn't exist a few years ago?
That's a really interesting question and a good point. I think based on -- if you ask everybody on the last 3 days of the mall portfolio. We absolutely -- not every asset in the bottom is here. And again, I don't like that phrase but I'm going to use it anyway. I would tell you, if you talk to our team, our leaders in that area, John Murphy and Eric Sade, Rick, Todd Lovins still loves to go through it. And John Ruley, et cetera, I would say to you 1 of the real opportunities for this company is to improve the bottom 20 and because you're right, there's no new supply in those markets. Just like human nature, we always want to work on the [ set ] we operate. So I do think there's a real potential to improve that because in many cases, we're the only game in town and given lack of supply and our ability to reinvest, I do think we can make real strides in the bottom tier, again, not every asset, but the majority plus of them. So that's a big focus going into '25 without question.
Our next question is from Floris Van Dijkum with Compass Point.
Question on the leasing by the way, I thought the response to Alex's question was fascinating, by the way, because we believe that the B malls or the lower-quality mall side, financing might finally be coming back to that market now, too. But maybe if you can talk about your SNO pipeline. Last quarter, you mentioned it was 250 basis points. How has that moved? I saw that for me just opened up its store in FIPS. And what percentage of that SNO pipeline is luxury in your view? Is it meaningful? And are there other dips type luxury project planned in the portfolio going forward?
Let me -- yes, interesting question again, and I would say I have it right in front of me are used to. So we have we've executed 75 new luxury deals covering 208,000 square feet and we have another 47 for signature. So that's kind of the total out there at this point. But again, we're increasing that every day as we speak. Even though the sales for certain brands has slowed in that area. They are continuing to commit and for, as you know, I mean, the build-out and the time for those retailers to open is probably compared to kind of a traditional retailer is longer. So we've got a very impressive pipeline that with a lot of square footage that will open over the next few years and growing to this day.
And Floris, the signed but not open number is about 300 basis points and importantly here, though, as you've heard David talk about multiple times, this is about merchandising mix. So this isn't all incremental. We're swapping out underperforming retailers or better retailers. And we do have retailers making commitments well into the future in that number as well.
Our next question is from Vince Tibone with Green Street.
Could you provide some color on the cadence of stabilization for the development and redevelopment pipeline. Specifically, if you could share how much incremental NOI you're expecting in '25 from the pipeline on a net basis, all the openings this year and next, offset by any disrupt or downtime with new projects, that would be super helpful for forecasting.
We think we're ultimately going to deliver about 30% of the portfolio investment in '25. So against the 8% unlevered yield, I think you get back into the estimated income contribution from that -- those data points.
And is that like an average then or I think about it like 30% on average will stabilize because like stuff that delivered -- the third quarter, for example, this year is obviously going to be accretive to '25. Just wanted to clarify that point.
I think that's a decent run rate for expectation relative to our development business, about 1/3 probably stabilizes.
And if I can squeeze in 1 more follow-up. Can you just provide a quick description of any mall redevelopment started in the quarter? I saw the spend increase some, but no description in the release of the project.
So we started a resi project at [ Briarwood ], and we started a redevelopment at Tacoma. Those were the 2 big ones in the quarter that really -- that we added to the pipeline.
Our next question is from Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital Markets.
Just given where we are with the election next week, just curious on your thoughts on potential positives or negatives that could come out depending on which side wins. And I guess, specifically, also, what would be your view on tariffs? Is that positive or negative for Simon's business as a whole.
Well, look, I am of the view that we should -- we -- look, I'm of the view that CEOs, whether they're founders kind of like the way I feel or up through the ranks, ought to stay out of politics, okay? That's not to say that they shouldn't lobby because there are a lot of things that go on in Washington that may affect the company and that's their job. So -- and I'm not here to endorse kind of take the Washington Post view that we have to be ready for all sorts of outcomes. I do think because of the vitriol that's occurring. And that's why we're cautious with respect to kind of our guidance for the fourth quarter is that it's an uncertain time, right? So not only here domestically and here globally.
But beyond that, I really am not going to get into that. I think the decision ought to be left to the -- to individuals, people like me should stay out of trying to influence the people, the people are what matter and we'll see what happens. We'll be prepared. There's basically 6 potential outcomes, right? If I had to do it right. You could have a democratic suite, you could have a Republican suite, and then you can used to be able to do that. But 3x. I think it's 6, right? So you can have 6 possible outcomes. We've got to be ready for all 6. And I'm not going to tell you what outcome I want. I don't think it's my job.
I do think it's my job to the lobby once we understand what's happening, like maybe on a de minimis rule or et cetera, that hurts our retailers or hurts our consumer but beyond that, if I could be, so I don't know -- I want to -- I don't know if I should say this, it sounds guys like me, who knows what guys like me means. But we ought to like just let the people decide without this overbearing influence from outside people. That's my personal kind of view. And we just need to be ready for 6 possible outcomes.
Our next question is from Michael Goldsmith with UBS..
Maybe just tying some of the themes that we've heard from the call together. Your occupancy crossed 96%, you feel like there's more room to grow. You're focused on merchandising and being selective. And then also it looks like your expiring rates for '26 maturities are below '25 by 6% to 7%. So you can -- growing it together, does that give you confidence or this ability to sustainable mid-single-digit NOI growth over the next couple of years?
Michael, it's Brian. Yes, we do believe that we will have. The momentum in NOI will continue. All of the things you highlighted are certainly part of it, plus the investment of capital back into the business. As you've heard David say, we will be opening up projects in '25, '26 and '27, but there's going to be no new supply. So that is certainly going to support our growth as well.
Our next question is from Linda Tsai with Jefferies.
Can you provide some color on the quarter-over-quarter improvement in domestic and portfolio NOI and then how do you think about NOI growth in '25 as an initial guidepost?
Well, Linda, I think in the quarter, we continue to see rent growth, occupancy growth conversion of temp to perm, I think you see the quarter reflecting us executing on our business plan to a high degree. And as I just said, I think we carry that momentum into next year as we continue to execute.
Any color on '25 though, in terms of the same level continuing?
Well, Linda, we give our guidance in February. So we'll update you at that point in time. But I do believe that we have momentum.
Our next question is from Mike Mueller with JPMorgan.
Two questions. First, do you think you'll see more acquisition opportunities over the next few years compared to what seen over the past 5 or 10? And then the second question on development, redevelopment. What do you see as the average spend level for the next 3 years?
Yes. I will -- I'll answer -- I'll let Brian take number two. But I'll answer one. I do -- listen, I think a company like ours has been always structured built finance to buy high-quality retail real estate has obviously been our primary focus. So it's hard to know whether it will be similar to what we've done the last 5 or 10 years. But there will be opportunities for us to grow. We really haven't done much of any acquisitions since the TRG deal, which was -- I can still remember that. It was in the height of -- well, it was we 2 weeks before COVID and then Bobby forgot to tell me, he should have known because he has those assets in China, but he forgot to tell me about COVID, but they've worked out for everybody involved.
But so it's really been a while. That doesn't mean that we're not looking, paying attention to it, but we're being very thoughtful about what we would like to buy and at what price. And I would tell you, that's not going to change, but I do think there'll be opportunities as we go forward. But again, it's hard to compare it to 5 or 10 years ago. But I do think over time, we'll grow through acquisition. Brian, ahead on the pipe.
And Michael, I think as you think about the development and redevelopment pipeline, you heard David talk there's about a $4 billion shadow pipeline. We've got [ $1.2 billion ] committed I think you're going to continue to see us committed for $1.5 billion a year. That could have by a couple of hundred million on either side, just given the size of the projects and the delivery of the projects. So we do see that level of investment available to us over in the future.
Our next question is from Ki Bin Kim with Truist Securities.
Just going back to shopsimon.com. Can you just provide some high-level parameters on the progress you're making, the traction you're gaining and also curious about the back-end logistics side of it. If you are -- given the multiple brands we have, are the shipments being consolidated? Or is it still each individual retailer funding shipments?
I'll answer that first. I mean, look, we're early days in using Shop Simon for delivery. Remember, it's mostly a marketplace, but we think over time, that will be a service that we'll be able to offer through the Shop Simon app or website. And I would say we've had remarkable growth in our GMV. We just rebranded it. So I'm only hesitant because we do have a partner in that, and I'm not sure I should disclose that to you but we've got a meaningful growth in our GMV there. And now that we're going to use our brand and our -- as Brian mentioned in his marks our $25 million e-mail list and add loyalty, we think the -- there'll be more retailers on, which will add to GMV, which will add to the overall volume of the site.
So I'm just going to be cautious Kin Bin because we have a partner there. So the good news is we're making a lot of progress and we've got real traction. We've got a number of retailers. I don't remember exactly, but Brian or Tom can tell you after the call. But I'll hold off on the GMV right now maybe at some point, we'll be able to disclose that.
Our next question is from Ron Kamdem with Morgan Stanley.
Just a quick 1 for me. Just looking at the sort of the domestic NOI growth almost 5%, which is pretty strong. In the past, you sort of made some comments about next year sort of hitting that 3% number. Just curious to get some updating comments on what you're seeing on the ground? And any sort of differentiation between the traditional mall and outlet business as well would be helpful.
Listen, I think overall, they're all kind of moving in that direction. So I appreciate you trying to get us to disclose our -- the '25 comp NOI growth. We will do so in February. We're just going through the phase of that now, which is, as I mentioned to you, we did the malls this week. We do the outlets and the mills next week, but we'll absolutely share that with you with our year-end earnings in early Feb. And -- but again, I think the momentum that we're seeing over the last couple of years continues. That's the important point.
There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to hand the floor back over to David Simon for any closing comments.
Okay. Thank you. I appreciate all the questions and interest. And we'll drop soon if we don't talk of a good holiday season. Thank you.
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.