Schlumberger NV
NYSE:SLB
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
39.57
55.22
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Schlumberger Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to the Vice President of Investor Relations, ND Maduemezia. Please go ahead.
Thank you, Lea. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Schlumberger Limited First-Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Today’s call is being hosted from Oslo, following the Schlumberger Limited Board meeting held earlier this week. Joining us on the call are Olivier Le Peuch, Chief Executive Officer; and Stephane Biguet, Chief Financial Officer.
Before we begin, I would like to remind all participants that some of the statements we will be making today are forward-looking. These matters involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. I therefore refer you to our latest 10-K filing and our other SEC filings.
Our comments today may also include non-GAAP financial measures. Additional details and reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures can be found in our first-quarter press release, which is on our website.
With that, I will turn the call over to Olivier.
Thank you, ND. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us on the call today. In my remarks, I will cover our first-quarter results and achievements followed by our latest view of the market environment and our outlook for the second quarter and the rest of the year, particularly internationally. Stephane will then give more detail on our financial results, and we will open the floor for your questions.
Considering the global context during the first quarter, I am very pleased with our start of the year. Sequentially, the quarter broadly reflected typical seasonal patterns, except for additional effects of the Russian ruble devaluation and a more pronounced sequential decline in Production Systems.
Year-on-year, we delivered a strong increase in earnings and revenue growth along with operating margins expansion. Our results were particularly strong in Well Construction and Reservoir Performance, where we are maximizing our leading market positions, our top-tier technology, performance, and enhanced operating leverage to full effect, both internationally and in North America.
All Divisions and Areas grew year-on-year, resulting in 14% overall growth. This was achieved through double-digit revenue growth internationally, and by fully capitalizing on our North America exposure with 32% revenue growth. Operating margins expanded in both North America and in the international markets, and we start the year with the highest first-quarter margins since 2015. This establishes an excellent foundation for our full-year margin expansion ambition.
Well Construction and Reservoir Performance, our core services Divisions, had very strong momentum to start the year. In addition, we secured several new multiyear contracts and improving commercial conditions in a number of geographies and services. Digital & Integration also posted double-digit growth compared to the same period last year, with new critical commercial contracts, and significant advance of our digital platform strategy with the launch of our first INNOVATION FACTORI in North America.
In Production Systems, our core equipment Division, year-on-year growth was muted by the impact of supply chain bottlenecks, which have pushed deliveries into subsequent quarters. Despite these transitory challenges, I am very pleased with the quality and size of the backlog and orders secured in the past 12 months. With improving supply conditions, I am confident that the execution of our response plan will significantly improve backlog conversion, resulting in an accelerated revenue growth dynamic in the coming quarters.
In Russia, the onset of the tragic conflict in Ukraine and corresponding sanctions impacted the later part of the quarter. We swiftly initiated a series of actions to ensure the safety of our people and implemented restrictive measures concerning new investment and technology deployment to our Russia operations. We continue to closely monitor this dynamic situation and remain hopeful for the quick cessation of hostilities.
Overall, and despite unique challenges, I am very pleased with the results of the quarter. I would like to extend my thanks to the entire Schlumberger team for successfully navigating these developments and delivering an excellent start to what promises to be a year of solid growth and achievement.
Turning now to the macro environment, the energy landscape has evolved significantly over the past few months. Recent events have, on one hand, resulted in a change in the pace of demand recovery, while energy security and supply diversification have also emerged as preeminent global drivers that will shape the future of our industry, in addition to decarbonization, capital discipline, and digital transformation. This new dimension will have long-lasting positive implications for energy investment over the next few years.
I would like to share how we see these dynamics developing over the short- and long-term horizons, and more importantly, how these conditions will play to Schlumberger’s differentiated strengths.
First, in the short term, commodity prices are elevated, as supply conditions continue to tighten due to the impacts of capital discipline, consistent OPEC+ policy implementation, and the potential impact of supply dislocation from Russia. The industry is responding to this high commodity price environment with accelerated short-cycle investment in North America led by the private producers and a gradual increase in investment by the public operators, albeit tempered by capital discipline and bottlenecks in capacity and supply chain.
Internationally, short-cycle investments are set to accelerate with the seasonal rebound in the second quarter and more strongly in the second half of the year, led by the Middle East and the key international offshore basins.
Second, the elevation of energy security as a priority will drive further capacity expansion and optionality to deliver a more diverse oil and gas supply. This will support additional long-cycle development projects, exploration activity, and brownfield rejuvenation programs.
Third, favorable conditions for product and services net-pricing improvements have clearly emerged and are expanding across both North America and the international markets. This will be a defining characteristic of this upcycle, considering the service sector’s newfound capital discipline and commitment to margin expansion.
These improvements are absolutely critical to support returns and investment in capacity that will be needed to deliver on both the short- and long-term oil and gas supply the world needs. The combination of these effects creates an exceptional sequence for our sector, likely resulting in a cycle of higher magnitude and duration than previously anticipated.
Schlumberger has led the sector in reinventing itself over the past few years, aligning closely with industry shifts, customer needs, and increased shareholder value. Since launching our performance strategy, we targeted trends that are manifesting today by focusing on the development of fit-for-basin technologies some of which are now unlocking much-needed energy supplies and by reducing or eliminating GHG emissions with our Transition Technologies portfolio and our new end-to-end emissions solutions. We have also expanded manufacturing capacity in key basins, such as in North America and in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to tailor fit-for-basin technology delivery.
In Digital, we are enabling transformation in the sector, establishing the industry digital platform, DELFI; creating more powerful AI solutions; and leading innovation in autonomy. These advances in digital enablement are improving both customer operations and our own efficiency, as we evolve workflows and improve execution with insights from data.
Today, Schlumberger is best positioned to capture the benefits of this unique upcycle, given the steady execution of our strategy, breadth of our market presence, leading technology portfolio, and our ability to derive premium pricing through our performance execution and value creation for our customers.
Now I would like to share with you our outlook for the second quarter and the second half of the year. Sequentially, we expect a solid quarter of growth in both North America and the international market. Growth in North America will be led by continued short cycle activity, offset by Canadian spring break-up. Internationally, growth will be driven by the seasonal rebound, albeit moderated by the absence of the usual second-quarter uptick in Russia, owing to the uncertainty around the ruble depreciation, impact of sanctions, and customer activity decline.
Taken together, this will result in global revenue growth around mid-single-digits for the second quarter. We anticipate the operating margins to expand 50 to 100 basis points, driven by further operating leverage and the positive conditions I have outlined. In that context, our sequential margin expansion trajectory is set to resume and subsequently strengthen in the second half of the year in line with our full-year guidance.
Looking further ahead, the second half of the year is shaping up to be particularly strong, based on our view of a significant pipeline of customer activity, upcoming product backlog conversion, and the growing impact of net pricing. This period of the year is typically the strongest half, and 2022 looks to be no exception. While the dynamic situation in Russia and the potential reduction in pace of the demand recovery present near-term concerns, we believe the continued tightness in supply, elevated commodity prices, and supplemental investment intended to diversify oil and gas supply should represent a positive offset for 2022 and beyond.
Accordingly, second-half growth will be driven primarily by the international markets, led by the Middle East and key offshore basins. Indeed, the offshore activity, already growing sequentially and visibly year-on-year, will benefit from secular growth in both shallow and deepwater environments as the acceleration of infill drilling and tieback developments will combine with a resurgence of exploration drilling during the summer, and with an acceleration of long-cycle development projects ahead of 2023.
Similarly, the Middle East region will benefit from the combination of reinvestment in short-cycle barrels as we approach the end of current OPEC+ agreements and from the commitment to capacity expansion in both oil production and gas developments. Additionally, 2022 is set to benefit from higher discretionary spending and higher product sales and year-end deliveries as customers secure the necessary capacity for their 2023 growth plans.
Finally, and critically, we anticipate that net pricing impact will further extend in breadth and scale as the year progresses, to benefit margin expansion during the second half, and become a unique attribute of this upcycle.
With this backdrop, and despite the uncertainty linked to Russia, we believe that the favorable market conditions I outlined should allow us to maintain our full-year ambitions of year-on-year revenue growth in the mid-teens, and adjusted EBITDA margins exiting the year at least 200 basis points higher than the fourth quarter of 2021.
I will now turn the call over to Stephane.
Thank you, Olivier, and good morning, ladies and gentlemen. First-quarter earnings per share, excluding charges and credits, was $0.34. This represents a decrease of $0.07 sequentially and an increase of $0.13 when compared to the first quarter of last year. In addition, during the quarter, we recorded a $0.02 gain relating to the further sale of a portion of our shares in Liberty Oilfield Services, which brought our GAAP EPS to $0.36.
Overall, our first-quarter revenue of $6 billion decreased 4% sequentially, while pretax operating margins declined 84 basis points to 15%. These decreases reflect the seasonally lower activity and product sales that we typically experience in the first quarter.
The conflict in Ukraine also had an impact on our first-quarter results, although this was largely limited to the effects of the depreciation of the ruble witnessed during the last month of the quarter.
While margins were seasonally lower on a sequential basis, they did increase significantly as compared to the first quarter of last year. Pretax segment operating margin increased 229 basis points year-on-year, while company-wide adjusted EBITDA margins of 21% increased 94 basis points year-on-year, despite the inflationary factors we are facing. This reflects the strength of our operating leverage, new technology uptake, and increasing pricing traction.
Let me now go through the first-quarter results for each Division. First-quarter Digital & Integration revenue of $857 million decreased 4% sequentially with margins declining 372 basis points to 34%. These decreases were primarily due to the effects of seasonally lower digital and exploration data licensing sales, partially offset by improved contribution from our APS projects in Ecuador, following the pipeline disruption of last quarter.
Reservoir Performance revenue of $1.2 billion decreased 6% sequentially while margins declined 232 basis points to 13.2%. These decreases were due to lower activity in Latin America and the seasonal activity reduction in the Northern Hemisphere.
Well Construction revenue of $2.4 billion was essentially flat sequentially as seasonal reductions in Europe, Russia, and Asia were offset by strong drilling activity in North America, Latin America, and the Middle East. Margins of 16.2% increased 77 basis points sequentially, despite the flat revenue largely due to improved profitability in integrated drilling projects.
Finally, Production Systems revenue of $1.6 billion decreased 9% sequentially and margins decreased 192 basis points to 7.1%. This was due to the effect of lower revenue following the traditionally higher fourth-quarter product sales combined with delayed deliveries and increased logistics costs resulting from global supply chain constraints.
These are temporary challenges that we are diligently working to remedy. Once resolved, this will provide for favorable upside to our revenue and margins in future quarters, as our backlog is solid, and we will ultimately return to a normal pace of deliveries.
Now, turning to our liquidity. During the quarter, we generated $131 million of cash flow from operations and negative free cash flow of $381 million. Our cash flow generation was seasonally low as a result of the increase in working capital requirements we always experience in the first quarter. In addition to the typical payout of our annual employee incentives in the first quarter, we saw lower cash collections following the exceptional accounts receivable performance of the fourth quarter.
Our inventory balance also grew due to the product delivery delays in our Production Systems Division, but also to prepare for project start-ups in the second quarter and for the strong growth anticipated for the rest of the year. In addition, we took the decision to increase our safety stocks and lock in prices on certain long-lead items in order to secure supply and hedge against anticipated cost inflation. Although, it is reflected outside of free cash flow, our overall cash position was enhanced by the further sale of a portion of our shares in Liberty, which generated $84 million of net proceeds. Following this transaction, we hold a 27% interest in Liberty.
Our working capital and cash flow will improve each quarter for the rest of the year, consistent with our historical trends and we remain confident in our ability to generate double-digit free cash flow margin on a full-year basis. This will allow us to continue deleveraging the balance sheet and exceed our previously stated leverage target in 2022.
Based on this and the strengthening industry outlook that Olivier described earlier, we announced today a 40% increase in our quarterly dividend. The increase will be reflected in our July dividend and will result in approximately $140 million of additional dividend payments in 2022 and $280 million on an annualized basis. This will have a minimal impact on our leverage and we will, of course, remain focused on strengthening the balance sheet.
I will now turn the conference call back to Olivier.
Thank you, Stephane. I think we can open the floor to the Q&A session. Thank you very much.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of David Anderson with Barclays. Please go ahead.
Hi, good morning, Olivier. What everything has happened over the past few months…
Good morning, David.
Hi, good morning. I look over the next several years for your international business to be a primary beneficiary here. I guess my question is the wrap up of that activity. We’ve seen a lot of NSPs in our contract more tenders are on the way. We’ve yet to really see the materials and activity, and we don’t have a ton of visibility on that market. I would just wonder if you could just help us understand what’s happening on the ground there. It seems like it’s just a matter of timing. But are there any challenges that you’re faced with mobilizing equipment and services environment, you’re clearly confident being a second half story, you could just provide a little bit more context into how we’re getting there, please? Thank you.
No. Thank you, Dave. So indeed, first, to put things in context. I think the international growth started to be rebounding last year. I think, as you know, year-on-year in the second half last year, we had already posted more than double-digit growth year-on-year in the second half. You can see that the on this quarter, we’re already at 10% growth year-on-year and the majority of our international unit actually posted double-digit, and quite a few above 20% year-on-year. So clearly the momentum of activity pick up internationally as being initiated, and it’s not only short cycle, it’s short and long cycle as some of it have already been signed last year and more are coming in the way.
So now looking ahead and trying to understand how this is hedging in the future. I think, first, there is a dynamic of coal on international supply that will continue to happen as the demand recovery is happening and as the market is looking for energy security enhance diversification of supply. So international base in at large will benefit from this dynamic in the years to come.
Secondly, you have the dynamic of short-cycle response to the tightness of supply as we face today and we face for the quarter to come, and this will fund not only activity of cycle in the second half of this quarter and in the same second quarter know the short-cycle basis from Middle East to some short-cycle activity offshore and it will be supplemented in the second half by an acceleration of the long-cycle development.
Indeed, we believe that the conditions are set for long- and short-cycle to be contributing at the same time to the supply growth of international market. And long-cycle is not only offshore, long cycle in some large capacity expansion, that national company major continuing to grow. And offshore market, we’ll also see the condition of major and international operator continue to expand the investment. So, we are seeing this happening today. We are seeing this accelerating the second half visibly as the combination of short and long run benefit in the international market.
And the OPEC+ as you know is ending their quota distribution at the end of the third quarter and this will unlock short-cycle. If you were to look at Middle East, a few countries have already made a commitment to capacity expansion in 2022 and beyond, and this will be supplementing the short-cycle investment. Offshore, you have seen some FID approval, you have seen some exploration drilling resuming last quarter that would just turn into FID and into subsea and the productivity uptick in the second half and furthermore in 2023.
So, in connection, as I said, for both short- and long-cycles to contribute to supply from international basin, and we are very well placed to respond to this considering favorable market exposure to international market. Our market position, technology, and our exposure to both major and independent into the basin internationally.
So, Olivier, on the offshore side. You highlighted a number of numerous offshore rewards in the release today, it covered most regions. This has typically been a very highly margin to create business to Schlumberger. I’m just curious how much of this is related to the events of the past few months? Are you seeing projects starting to accelerate? I would think you’d start to see a lot more on the short cycle activity in terms of short versus long, I would think maybe short cycle activity is selling because of this, is that true? Are you starting to see that materialize?
No, I will comment in two sides. First, offshore markets remain very relevant to many of our customers internationally, very relevant, why? Because the economics of offshore market both shallow and deepwater have improved a lot in the cycle. Secondly, many of these offshore reserves they will place from a carbon footprint and I think this is something that plays again to reinvestment and expansion. And, third, I think the technology, the integration capability and digital have made offshore operations more efficient, more effective, have an impact on short cycle offshore infill drilling, tie back with huge technology infrastructure we have there.
And in near field exploration on one hand, and secondly shorter, long cycle that is a characteristic that we see accelerating has the major on the IOC and some NOC that have unique basin – advantage basin. We want to accelerate the FID and we want to accelerate the execution of the FID for contributing supply. And, again, integration capability, technology for performance impact, and digital we all combined to make this a reality.
So yes, we have already seen the impact of this, and is only set to accelerate and will not see a link to the event happening the last few weeks, the last few weeks event will have the consequence of diversification of supply and security of supply. And this will favor offshore basins as one of the best thing that can contribute to the long-term supply security.
Much appreciate Thank you.
You’re welcome.
And next we have a question from Chase Mulvehill with Bank of America. Please go ahead
Hey, good morning, guys.
Good morning, Chase.
So I wanted to follow-up on Dave’s question here on the international side. I mean, obviously, it appears that this international recovery is going to exceed last cycle recovery. So maybe I don’t know, if you want to take a moment kind of talk about how this will impact pricing, in margin. I was actually just digging through some old models and looking 2006, 2007, 2008 margins, and obviously the industry margins back then were much, much better than they were last cycle. So what do you think it would take for the industry to really get back, and move towards those 2006, 2007, 2008 margins?
I think the [condition offset for direction they’re going down] [ph], clearly, and I think you have several factor playing. First, derivative activity expansion globally in every basin for every division is playing the condition for tightness in the capacity of the service supply and the coupon supply. And these conditions are extremely favorable for pricing power, because our operator, the customer are looking to secure capacity and to secure data reassurance as they are invest into their basins, into their favorable assets to secure this position to this supply market share.
So, first, the pricing moments as I said are the pricing attributes to be a key characteristic of the cycle. Secondly, I believe that the industry has realized that technology can make a huge impact on performance on carbon footprint and on digitalization to deliver efficiency that we need to accelerate the cycle and today that assurance of delivery of these extra values.
So we believe that we have here the condition for an upside on the technology adoption and upside on digital transformation of the industry trying to achieve operation automation, achieve drilling autonomy, in terms of preparation and all that recombine in addition to decarbonization. So we have these trends that are new, that will augment the mix effect that this market is giving us today. You have a favorable mix international, and then the offshore mix. Yeah, that favorable pull and stretch on capacity of the industry with significant discipline on this side of the industry that will lead to pricing expansion.
And finally, you have this adoption of digital adoption of decarbonization, and adoption of any fit-for-basin performance technology that can make an impact to deliver, because industry wants to deliver and participate fully to the cycle. So that’s the reason why we are positive on the cycle.
Okay. If I could follow-up quickly, you started talking about digital a little bit. I mean, there’s obviously, tightening supply chain, you’ve got emerging labor constraints, you’ve got accelerated international growth, over the next 12 to 14 months, and all this should be pretty positive for digital, as the industry kind of searches for ways to do things kind of faster, smarter, and harder. So, with that said, and with that as a backdrop, have you started to see accelerated digital adoption? And if so, what parts of the international market, are you really starting to see accelerated adoption?
No. I think you laid, Chase, very well, I think, digital will be an attribute of efficiency, performance and transformation in the cycle, no doubt, everybody will cognize it and everybody’s investing towards being to this digital transformation. We believe with our platform strategy, we are absolutely the most compelling offer to the market. And we have been building as you heard before, for the last 3 to 5 years, the foundation of our platform, and we have seen adoption accelerating last year.
So year-to-date, I’m very pleased with the performance – the early performance of the year to our digital business out of our digital integration division. It is already contributing to visible growth year-on-year or the matrix that we are internally following with the customer adoption of our DELFI with the number of users that are using a cloud-DELFI capability, albeit the number of the scale and intensity of mid-cycle of computing cycle adoption, all these are going sequentially and year-on-year, up.
So, adoption is happening, you have seen some enhancements have grown during the quarter. And you continue to see adoption translating into compact and into growth, accretive growth for digital. Finally, I think, as we mentioned into the EPR [ph], we have been announcing a year ago our INNOVATION FACTORI. INNOVATION FACTORI, our digital collaborative center that we have placed strategically and we just integrated the last one yesterday in Oslo, Norway.
And we are using displays to expose a customer to the capability of our platform with AI and machine learning using our partner capability, and to get into DELFI. And the customer realized that we can achieve a lot we have delivered 200-project collaboratively for customers and the customer understand the power of your platform to its exposure and then come away with the ability to scale for enterprise deployment from this INNOVATION FACTORI capability.
So, this is one other dimension of adoption that we see and as part of our offering to the market. So, yes, we are convinced this will be accretive to evolve this year. And this will be also adding a positive full through of our margin that will support our margin expansion ambition for the full year.
Okay, perfect. I appreciate the answer. I’ll turn it back over. Thanks, Olivier.
Thank you.
Next, we go to Arun Jayaram with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
Yeah, good morning. Olivier, I wanted to get your perspective on any changes you’re seeing in customer spending behavior related to natural gas. You have very strong international and now U.S. gas prices. And just wanted to get your thoughts if you’re seeing any changes there, particularly given the fact that Russia supplies 155 BCM of gas to Europe.
It’s a very relevant question. I think it’s a very typical subject with the operators, and indeed, we are seeing operator preparing, planning and being ready for accelerating the gas supply to the world market, internationally and North America as well. I think this is touching all aspects of exploration, development and production of gas. And we are very pleased for exposure. I put it in North America and exposure internationally.
Internationally, as you know, we have exposure in conventional gas. And, I think, you have seen some recent announcement of renewing contracts in commercial gas in Saudi, you are fully aware of market exposure in Qatar, that we have benefited for the last 2 years that have already grown visibly to commit more LNG train for supply to the world. And you have seen also that we are going to participate fully and we are participating fully into offshore integrated gas development, similar to what we did a few years back with them in East Mediterranean.
We are doing with an asset for fully integrated gas in Turkey in the Black Sea, where we are taking care of everything from development to the gas facility that will be our first gas for me. So, we are very, very exposed, and finally, unconventional gas internationally in the risk, particularly is getting significant support for regional consumption and you are fully aware of the contract, very large contract, integrated contract, we have with Jafurah in Saudi Aramco.
So, the exposure we have on gas is unique conventional, unconventional, offshore, onshore. So, and finally, we had to add one dimension of technology on to it, I was very pleased. This week we participate to visit in Norway. And we had the opportunity to visit excellent our Center of Excellence for subsea processing in Bergen, Norway, where we are manufacturing all of our processing boosting equipment to serve gas markets in deepwater subsea environment. And in particular, the subsea wet gas compression that will be deployed for [ammonia] [ph] to extend the life of ammonia gas supply to UK for the long run.
So, this participate to the energy security, this participate to the gas development pollution and we are very pleased by exposure. So we are seeing signal of acceleration commitment, and very well diverging that for the future.
Right. I appreciate that. My follow up is, I wanted to talk a little bit about cash returns, you increase the dividend quite significantly this quarter, but maybe Olivier or Stephane, you could talk about the framework, you’re thinking about future cash returns and how should we be thinking about further dividend increases from here?
Look, it’s good question. Thank you. Yes, based on the market fundamentals, we highlighted. We do expect to continue generating significant free cash flow throughout the cycle evolves favorable conditions persist, as we currently anticipate, this will clearly allow us to, at the same time maintain the strong balance sheet to fund new growth opportunities, and look for additional ways to increase shareholder returns throughout the cycle. So, this can take the form of increased dividend share repurchases or a combination of both.
So, as it relates to a framework, we will, of course, provide further details at our upcoming Capital Market Day meet. At this moment, we said the dividend that level we are comfortable with to allowing us to balance or continuing deleveraging commitments with the overall capital allocation priorities.
Great. Thank you.
And next we have a question from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.
Great…
Hey, Neil.
Hey, good morning, team. So first question here is, just more of a logistical question. I think in the back half of this year, the expectation is to do a capital market day. So, one, any update in terms of timing; but secondly, what do you want to achieve at that event? What are the important strategic priorities that you want to discuss with the investment community?
So on the logistical side, Neil, the Capital Market Day will be early November and you’ll receive the invitations pretty soon. I’ll let to leave a comment on the main agenda.
The main agenda, as you know, I think would be to achieve 2 or 3 key elements. The first is to lay out our updated view of the mid and long term outlook for industry. And, of course, the engines that we want to participate fully into the core of digital and new energy, and a search document our view of the market scenario and the way our play will expose us to be participate in each of these three.
The second, [indiscernible] strategy that will make you understand the tangible progress we have made. The critical milestones will meet by 2025 or by 2030. And finally, our document, we will say, our financial ambition, and financial and capital framework to support this ambition of our strategic execution for the next 5 years and with the long horizon of 2030 for target. So that’s what we are aiming to achieve this Capital Market Day.
Thank you. So we look forward to it. And the follow-up is, can you talk about your exposure to the increased CapEx here at Saudi Aramco and ADNOC, and how you see that trickling across your segments? Where do you expect expanding to increase significantly here in across what business lines?
I have been generally speaking, I think, it is not only Saudi Aramco, and Saudi and UAE, I think is the HGC [ph] country and includes the hike as well, I think that set for a significant rebound in both short cycles to respond to the unlocking the quota at the end of the year. And then long cycle with capacity expansion commitments that several countries have made. So, we expect the consequence of that will be first in the second half of the year activity will start to see an uptick in the form of short cycle and that will affect both with our performance while construction. And we will see also this expanding into offshore and onshore capacity expansion more into 2023.
As you know, several compact have been put in place to support this capacity expansion by this operator with first and the industry at large. And this will see an acceleration of investment in 2023 that will expand beyond the short-cycle visibly into this new development, new capacity beyond what is happening today on gas and commercial happening today in some of the integrated contract we already own. So it will be widespread, I will say, and across all the division as we move into 2023.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
Next, we have a question from Scott Gruber with Citigroup. Please go ahead.
Yeah. So, I wanted to touch on the new energy outlook here just given out of the macro has changed. Obviously, valuations and new energy have come down and your cash flow outlook has improved. So does that mean in the years ahead, we could expect Schlumberger to be investing a bit more aggressively in new energy or for the better outlook for the core, is there less urgency to build out the new energy business as we think about that?
No, it remains – our new energy remains a critical strategic pillar of our long-term strategy. So, we are set to continue to invest into the venture we have created. We are making tactical moves and strategic moves to accelerate organic and inorganic investment. And we continue to monitor the market and continue to edge and grew exposure to this. So, the market condition that have slightly changed in last few weeks, do not change your view on the new energy outlook.
We have been seeing some investments and you have seen this in the quarter into geothermal as an alternate source of energy. You have seen the geoenergy being through the CCUS energy venture if you have credit was either domain that was enough defied by EU, the European Union to be invested into the gas and has to lessen the dependency on single source of supply on gas. And I think you can see that anticipate and see that CCUS at large is going as an opportunity for all industry and for us as we work not only with industry as we have seen the announcement we have made respect on us.
But also we are working beyond the industry as you have seen previous engagement we have and continue to do so. So, I think, we continue to develop and mature the technology ready for scaling them. And we continue to make organic investments and securing inorganic of opportunity to augment our capability into that space.
And then you started to touch on my follow-up, which relates to the commercial opportunity and how that developed here going forward. And it does seem like geothermal is going to get a pole here, because typically the other commercial opportunities and how you think those evolves particularly from a timing and cadence perspective, given the backdrop is the course opportunity materialized more quickly across carbon capture and hydrogen electrolyzes…
I think, we have been commenting on this before. And, I think, we’ll pull out a very comprehensive view at our Capital Markets Day. And, I think, the biggest and long-term bigger potential is both on CCUS and hydrogen market, we believe, first and foremost. And believe that the energy storage including lithium processing extraction, as well as energy, stationary energy storage, as well as geo energy and geothermal, certainly a shorter-term and midterm opportunity that will not miss to secure. But we’ll come back with more detail and more of a better framework for you to understand our mission there.
I look forward to it. Thanks for the color.
Thank you.
Next, we go to Connor Lynagh with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.
Thank you. Good morning.
Good morning, Connor.
I wanted to ask about – thank you. I just wanted to ask about the potential recovery in the back half and particularly OPEC, you were alluding to the cessation of the supply agreement. I guess one thing that surprised us is while there have been some countries that have fallen short of their production targets, OPEC as a group has been able to raise production fairly significantly. And there hasn’t been as significant an increase in the rig count. I appreciate not all activity is captured in the rig count. But as that surprised you, and when do you think we see a sort of catch up? Do we need to return to 2019 activity levels to get to 2019 production levels?
First, I think the OPEC+ indeed has been very strict in to implementing the policy and respect to the quota. Second thing with very few exception, the GCC has been able to need unlock this production without significant at this moment, significant increase in short cycle activity to support that increase, this will position into necessary investment into supporting the sustain capacity in the coming month, until then and until now it has been that the production of some critical country where below their sustained capacity potential and the need for investing the need for accelerating investment tradition or intervention was measured and wasn’t necessarily disproportionate compared to the past. I think you will see that positioning into the second half, and accelerating next year and it will combine with a capacity expansion they have committed to.
So they will be hiking activity on two fronts, the short cycle to distant sustain maximum capacity that is established and an investment that will expand it this sustained capacity in the future. So that is said to happen, it wasn’t necessarily a big surprise to us, I think that Middle East was a bit of behind in terms of activity rebound internationally until now, but you will see this catching up in the second half and accelerating in 2023.
All right. Thank you. That’s helpful context. Maybe just flipping over to the Russia side of things, I’m curious, in your full year revenue growth commentary, what are you contemplating in your Russia operations? Are you expecting significant activity declines? Could you help us frame what the cessation of new investments actually means for your activity levels in the near-term here?
I think, it’s obviously an extremely dynamic situation. If you want the sanction of Saudi having an impact on the Russian economy in operation will not be immune to this effect. But currently currency situation as you have seen our customer activity level today or tomorrow. So – and there is also possibility of further assumption, so the impact of the first quarter, as you have seen was essentially limited to consider for differentiation and division. It’s very difficult at the moment to predict what the impact may be in an upcoming quarter considering the uncertainty.
On the flip side, as I’ve described, the environment that we see and the dynamics we see in the market, and the response to this call for energy security is carrying the condition to offset this uncertainty and set this risk. And also, the decision we have made to suspend new investment will mean that we’ll be able to allocate this CapEx to this upcoming opportunity effective this year, and then being able to capture this offsetting activity in the dynamic environment. And as you say, should allow us to offset and keep our financial condition intact.
All right. Thank you very much. I’ll turn it back.
Thank you.
And next, we go to Roger Read with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
Yeah. Thanks. Good morning.
Good morning, Roger.
I would like to ask 2 questions that are more or less margin focused the first on production systems, which obviously is lagging, for obvious reasons. But if we don’t get a strong subsea or offshore deepwater recovery, what else can we expect that would lift the production systems margins as we go forward?
I think there are 2 elements. I think, we should need to we should really set out here the first is the transitory temporary impact we have had on the excessive cost of logistics, and very, very supply chain bottleneck that we have to walk through that had led to temporary costs that I think will over time abate and will reduce as we walk through this supply chain. We have a corrective action plan with diversification of source of supply, using different [defenders uses routes] [ph]. And you heard about our commitment to some critical safety stock for inventory to secure less disruption going forward. So this disruption aside that has had consequential cost, super multi cost impact, I think we expect this to be more subdued, as we go forward. We could start to accelerate a conversion of our backlog.
So what do we need? I think we have already seen the backlog. We have a very big backlog that we have accumulated for the last few quarters then we keep going. And it’s not only subsea our production system is made of subsea, as I mentioned, I think we’re very proud of some of the market position in subsea, including what we have seen in Norway, but also have a completion with a few contracts that we won’t, in the Middle East, in Brazil, in particular, actually lift PCB pumps that you have seen that we have won just in Kuwait, very good position; pollution chemicals that are being pulled as well. And midstream and surface common capability that are fully diverging batteries are faced the upcycling in North America. So we go through this, we have not only short-cycle exposure with surface in North America with completion uplift.
We have long cycle focus in deepwater, and some of our long cycle participation into some gas facility as I mentioned in Turkey, you combined all this and you have enough backlog to lift and trade and uplift into our growth going forward and actually indicative of pollution system to be accretive to our growth in the second half.
Thanks for that, that was very helpful. The other question I have is a little bit more far reaching. But as we think about, let me say, the base case is let’s assume what’s happened in Russia stays as is the sanctions, everything like that through the middle of the decade, spending other parts of the world is going to have to increase to make up for lost Russian production at a minimum loss Russian growth if not absolute last barrels. And, I was wondering, as you look at your margins and you think about sort of an equal distribution of that spending or that production growth in other parts of the world, should it be no impact on Schlumberger’s margins, a modest positive or a modest negative? If Russia becomes a shrunken market and some of these other areas have to grow in response.
I think, I will not try to compare Russia margin with the rest of our portfolio. I think, I will look at it from strength of the cycle, from the unique market position we have. And from the starting point we have today with adding restructured and reset operating leverage, the exposure with digital, the exposure with an increasing offshore long- and short-cycle mix, I think, these attributes that convince us that our margin will continue to expand. As we have seen this quarter, we have increased year-on-year, both Num [ph] and international margin. And we have been posting the best margin since then 2015. And, yet, despite an impact in the first quarter from Russia. So I think we’re looking at it, as you say, the big picture includes a investment in oil and gas for energy security, a diversification that will have a call on international supply as well as in North America.
And an increasing mix of short and long cycle as capacity needs to be expanded. And the reserves that have been depleted through the through the last down cycle for the last seven years will need to be expanded again. So that mix is what makes us confident into our trajectory of margin expansion, and into the potential uniqueness of this upcycle compared to past, and hence the confidence we have in a short- and long-term.
Great. Thank you.
And, ladies and gentlemen, we have time for one last question that’s from the line of Ian Macpherson with Piper Sandler. One moment, please. And please go ahead, sir.
Thank you. Good afternoon in Oslo. Just wanted to wrap up, Olivier, I wanted to ask directly, what is your view of the production trajectory for Russia, assuming the sanctions are what we see today, I know that you don’t want to be too specific with regard to the cadence of your impact over the course of this year. But do you subscribe to the idea that that at best Russia pivots from a steady grower to a steady decliner under the current sanctions regime?
I think, I cannot be speculating on this market condition. I think, you see the same numbers as we do see. You see that there is a set of potential risk of Russia supply dislocation, I think, what is important is that the demand trajectory that is recovering, and it’s set to further increase next year, compared to previous prediction, not only to offset that, but to also respond to the market, I think, will be contributing overall, so it’s very difficult to predict. I think, we are – this is a very dynamic situation. And we are not here to speculate on a dynamic situation.
We know that we have to account for assumption, that it could be a demand distribution, it could be a demand, or supply disruption from the Russia source of supply. And we know and we have seen our customer outpacing and studying to anticipate, and position themselves for taxes bring to the coolant supply that will happen from the second half of this year and the years to come. So that’s the only thing we can come up with.
That’s a perfectly fair answer. But maybe put otherwise, how critical would you say that Schlumberger and your Western OFS [ph] peers are relative to the domestic Russian OFS industry with regard to their ability to lean on internal OFS resources as opposed to a Western technology and kit?
No, again, we cannot we cannot speculate on this. I think, we are first and foremost priority is to look after the safety of our people, everywhere we’re operating in Russia, and to comply with the most divisions to the sanction – international sanctions that are in place to speculate about wealth, while the consequence of the sanction on to the history is Russia, I think, it’s something that the future will tell us what is happening. But, I think, I don’t want to be in a position to come up on this moment.
Fair enough. But thanks for all the other answers today. I appreciate it.
Thank you very much. I believe that it’s time to close this call. So, in conclusion, I would like to leave you with 3 takeaways. Firstly, our first-quarter financial results represent a strong start to what promises to be a significant year for the company. In particular, the resilience and strength of our core services Divisions and the full participation in the fast-growing North America market have contributed to a very solid year-on-year growth and margins expansion.
Secondly, the activity outlook is shaping up favorably as 2022 progresses and is set to support our full-year mid-teens growth ambition, despite the uncertainties on our Russia operations. Furthermore, in the later part of the year, we will gain from improving market conditions, favorable activity mix in key offshore basins and the Middle East, and broader net pricing impact across North America and international markets.
Our confidence in the favorable market conditions and our mid-term outlook supports our margin expansion ambition and our commitment to generate double-digit free cash flow. As a result, we have decided to accelerate cash returns to shareholders through a visible increase in our dividend.
Finally, we believe that the consequences of the current crisis will reinforce the market fundamentals for a stronger and longer upcycle, as the priority on energy security will favor reinvestment in oil and gas supply. Consequently, the outlook for the next few years is improving and, absent a global economic setback, should translate into an exceptional sequence for the industry. Thank you very much.
Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude your conference for today. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.