R

Revvity Inc
NYSE:RVTY

Watchlist Manager
Revvity Inc
NYSE:RVTY
Watchlist
Price: 112.03 USD 0.83% Market Closed
Market Cap: 13.6B USD
Have any thoughts about
Revvity Inc?
Write Note

Earnings Call Transcript

Earnings Call Transcript
2018-Q1

from 0
Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the PerkinElmer Q1 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]

I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Tommy Thomas, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

T
Tommy Thomas
executive

Thank you, Sarah. Good afternoon, and welcome to the PerkinElmer First Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. With me on the call are Rob Friel, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Andy Wilson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.

If you have not received a copy of our earnings press release, you may get one from the Investors section of our website at www.perkinelmer.com. Please note that this call is being webcast live and will be archived on our website until May 14, 2018.

Before we begin, we need to remind everyone of the safe harbor statements that we have outlined in our earnings press release issued earlier this afternoon and also those in our SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements made today represent our views only as of today. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements in the future even if our estimates change. So you should not rely on any of today's forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date after today.

During this call, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures we plan to use during this call to the most directly comparable GAAP measure is available as an attachment to our earnings press release. To the extent we use non-GAAP financial measures during this call that are not reconciled to GAAP in that attachment, we will provide reconciliations promptly.

I am now pleased to introduce the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PerkinElmer, Rob Friel. Rob?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Thanks, Tommy. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. I'm pleased to report PerkinElmer had a very good start to 2018, delivering excellent growth in revenue and earnings.

Revenue for the first quarter was $644 million, representing reported growth of 25%, and organic growth of 6%, comprised of 5% growth from our base business and 1% growth from EUROIMMUN's incremental organic growth.

Adjusted earnings per share was $0.63, representing growth of 15% over Q1 last year and $0.03 better than the midpoint of our guidance. The EPS beat was attributable to the higher organic revenue growth in the quarter and the slightly lower tax rate than planned.

In addition to the impressive financial performance, each of our 2 businesses made notable progress on our objective to invest in high-growth areas, while shifting our portfolio towards those opportunities that are best aligned with our capabilities and expertise. Given our results and positive expectations, moving ahead, we feel confident in raising our full year revenue and profit guidance, which I'll speak to in a few minutes.

Turning to our end markets. Diagnostics, which now represents 40% of our revenue and our largest end market, grew 62% on a reported basis and 7.5% organically with core Diagnostics business growing mid-singles organically and EUROIMMUN growing mid-teens organically.

Within Life Sciences, which represents about 35% of our revenue and includes sales to our pharma, biotech, academic and government customers, revenue grew 12% on a reported basis and 7% organically. Sales to pharma and biotech increased high single digits organically, and academic and government sales increased mid-single digits organically.

The remaining 25% of our revenue is in the applied markets and includes our industrial, food and environmental customers, and increased 7% on a reported basis and organically 2%. Sales to environmental and food customers grew mid-single organically, but were offset by some softness in the industrial markets.

We're very pleased to see our 2 largest end markets, Diagnostics and Life Science, growing high single digits, through a combination of favorable market conditions as well as our respective strong market positions and excellent execution.

So in addition to being pleased with the breadth of our growth this quarter, I am also very excited with the progress on our initiatives to increase profitability. While operating margins contracted in the quarter as we anticipated, we've made very good progress on both reducing product costs through low-cost sourcing and supplier consolidation and collaboration.

In addition, we are on track to deliver over $15 million in savings in manufacturing costs in the next 2 years through the deployment of our Lean processes and footprint optimization. As a result, I remain confident we will achieve the operating margins goal of 70 to 90 basis points improvement for this year as well as 22% operating margins by the year 2020.

Also during the first quarter, we continued to make very good progress on the key growth initiatives we outlined earlier in the year that we expect will enable us to achieve high single-digit organic growth by 2020.

The integration of EUROIMMUN continues to go very well. In the U.S., the combination of our commercial and regulatory resources is already yielding some nice wins, as evidenced by recently placing a number of our new automated ELISA workstations with one of the large reference labs.

In addition, we received FDA approval for 2 lupus detection assays as our combined regulatory resources continue to submit new tests. And we now expect an additional 12 new assays to approve this year.

We have also transitioned the service of all EUROIMMUN equipment from third parties to PKI engineers, which will reduce costs and improve response time with consumers. And while we continue to prioritize the integration of the U.S. portion of EUROIMMUN, the technology and commercial groups globally are identifying many additional growth synergies across the portfolio between EUROIMMUN, the greater reproductive health business, our China diagnostic business, applied genomics and our tool of immuno-diagnostics business in India. I look forward to updating you on these opportunities on later calls.

One of the key drivers to our future growth in diagnostics is Vanadis' noninvasive prenatal testing solution. A research study recently published in Nature Scientific Reports detailed the first clinical proof of concept data, demonstrating the ability to apply Vanadis assay in the detection of trisomy 21 in maternal plasma. We look forward to receiving CE marking shortly with shipments commencing in the second half.

The third focus area in our Diagnostic business is our whole genome sequencing service from PerkinElmer genomics. In the first quarter, we processed about 5,000 samples and remain on track to reach the $8 million to $10 million of revenue for 2018 at attractive margins. We're ramping up some exciting partnerships with other leading organizations in the genomics field that, together, make new inroads in the areas of rare disease research as well as genetic testing of healthy populations.

To mention just a couple of recent highlights, we announced the Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy has selected PerkinElmer genomics as its partner to perform full genome sequencing of the entire year Duchenne gene, using a new comprehensive assay. We are also collaborating with Helix to offer one of their first clinical products, with the initial product being the 59-gene panel that the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics identifies as genetic conditions with established interventions aimed at significantly reducing morbidity and mortality.

Turning to Discovery & Analytical Solutions, or our DAS business, as I discussed in January, the priorities of the business are shifting, from putting the processes and organization in place to operate as a single cohesive business, to both accelerating growth and being more consistent. One of the key components of that strategy is to continue to leverage our informatics and OneSource service offerings to improve our pharmaceutical customers' lab productivity.

A number of our customers are discussing a lab service model with us where the requirements for connected systems to avoid data silos, linked distributed research, manage complex data sets and ensure compliance are driving them to our unique OneSource and informatics capabilities.

Some of the investments we made last year are starting to fuel growth this year. For example, at the end of last year, we launched our new PerkinElmer signals application for research, translational, clinical development and enterprise analytics and search, which has led to one of our top global pharma customers selecting our analytics platform to power its in-house clinical trial review program.

Also, we launched a new version of ChemDraw, with significantly increased functionality, including biologics, which has experienced a good uptake in the market.

Going forward, we believe the ChemDraw offering, which is used by 35,000 scientists, can be better leveraged to increase connectivity and ultimately revenue with our scientific customer base.

Another important component of the DAS growth strategy is to accelerate our growth in China and emerging markets with increased investments to build local capabilities that address unmet needs.

In the first quarter, the DAS organization continued improving localization in emerging markets by expanding manufacturing capabilities. We are now producing 3 product lines in China, and expect soon to close on a small acquisition in China to expand our elemental analysis products. For the DAS business, China grew high teens in the first quarter, with broad-based growth across Life Sciences and the applied markets.

Finally, both businesses will continue to develop innovative new products to support our customers and help solve their most pressing challenges. We are again targeting $50 million of incremental revenue from new products, exclusive of EUROIMMUN, and through the first quarter, we generated $14 million from products introduced in the last year.

So to summarize the quarter, we are off to a great start. Our end markets for the most part continue to be robust. The organization is executing well, and we feel good about our ability to deliver on our financial forecast for this year.

However, more importantly, we continue to make very good progress on our strategic priorities that should accelerate both the growth and profitability of the company, and achieve the financial profile we have outlined for 2020.

In recognition of both the progress made in the first quarter and the continuing opportunities available to us, we have increased both our revenue and adjusted EPS guidance for the year. While Andy will discuss the details, we are increasing our revenue forecast for the year to $2.8 billion, reflecting slightly stronger organic growth in both our base business and EUROIMMUN as well as changes in foreign exchange rates since our prior guidance. We are also increasing our adjusted EPS guidance to $3.60, which is $0.10 above our previous guidance, and represents an increase of 24% over 2017.

Before I turn the call over to Andy, I'd like to remind everyone that this will be Andy's last PerkinElmer's earnings call. I would like to take a moment to thank Andy for not only his leadership and oversight of our financial function, but for also the significant role he has played in the transformation of PerkinElmer over the last 9 years.

During Andy's tenure, we were able to significantly strengthen PerkinElmer's financial profile, evolve our portfolio and increase the value of the company. On behalf of the entire senior leadership team and all the employees of PerkinElmer, I'd like to express our sincere gratitude to Andy for his leadership and wish him well.

I also appreciate Andy's commitment to ensure a smooth transition. As you know, our new Chief Financial Officer, Jamey Mock's first day will be tomorrow. However, he has joined us this evening.

I'd now like to turn the call over to Andy.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Thanks for the kind words, Rob, and good afternoon, everyone. I also want to express my appreciation to the many inspirational people who have helped me throughout my time at PerkinElmer. I'd like to wish you all and especially our new CFO, Jamey Mock, continued success in the future.

I'll now move on to the results for the first quarter of 2018, where I'll provide some additional color on our served end markets, summary of our financial results for the first quarter as well as details around our 2018 guidance for the second quarter and full year.

We were pleased with the start to 2018 as reported revenue increased 25% and adjusted earnings per share increased 15% over the first quarter of last year, exceeding our expectations set back in January. Adjusted revenues in the first quarter grew to $644 million, with organic growth of approximately 6%, foreign exchange representing a tailwind of approximately 5% and acquisitions adding approximately 14%.

By business segment, Diagnostics represented approximately 40% of total sales, with organic revenue growth of approximately 7.5% for the first quarter, driven by solid organic revenue growth in EUROIMMUN. Discovery & Analytical Solutions, representing approximately 60% total sales, grew approximately 5% organically in the first quarter, highlighted by strength in the Life Sciences end markets, specifically from our informatics and OneSource offerings.

We were pleased to see continued solid order demand in the quarter and, as a result, we were able to build additional backlog, giving us momentum entering the second quarter. I'll provide some additional color on both businesses in a moment.

We experienced healthy growth across all major geographies, with high single-digit organic revenue growth in Asia; mid-single-digit organic revenue growth in the Americas and in Europe. This represents 3 consecutive quarters of growth across all major geographies. In the BRIC regions, we experienced high teens organic revenue growth driven by continued strength in Brazil, a very strong performance in India and mid-teens organic revenue growth in China.

Moving to the details of our operating results. First quarter adjusted gross margins were 48.6%, up 20 basis points from the prior year on a reported basis, and up approximately 100 basis points on an FX-neutral basis. Reported results were favorably impacted by EUROIMMUN and benefits from our productivity initiatives, partially offset by unfavorable mix and the dilutive impact of foreign exchange. Adjusted SG&A was 26.6%, up 60 basis points from the prior year, with the addition of EUROIMMUN being the primary driver of the increase.

Research and development expenditures were 7.1% of adjusted revenue, up approximately 70 basis points, driven by continued investments in Vanadis and the inclusion of EUROIMMUN. As a result, operating -- adjusted operating margin was 14.9%, down 110 basis points on a reported basis. On an FX-neutral basis, adjusted operating margin was consistent with our plan, and down approximately 20 basis points, due mostly to the seasonality of EUROIMMUN profitability.

Please note that as of January 1, 2018, we adopted the recently issued pension accounting standards and have restated prior years. The impact versus our prior guidance is an increase in operating costs of approximately $2 million per quarter, with an offsetting increase in other income. There is no net impact to adjusted EPS.

Because foreign exchange is having a greater impact on our forecasted revenue relative to our guidance and EUROIMMUN's cost structure significantly changes our earnings flow-through from changes in foreign exchange rates, I wanted to briefly describe this dynamic.

Prior to the acquisition of EUROIMMUN, changes in our euro and Chinese yuan-denominated revenue resulted in a mid-teens operating margin flow-through based on the global distribution of our production costs and operating expenses.

As we have discussed, roughly 75% of EUROIMMUN's revenue is in Europe and China, and it's split approximately 45% in Chinese yuan, and 35% in euro. However, as most of EUROIMMUN's production and R&D expenses are in Germany, over 70% of their expenses are in euros.

As a result, this affects PerkinElmer's overall margin flow-through on changes in the value of the euro, as our euro expenses now slightly exceed our euro revenue. Consequently, an increase in the value of the euro relative to the dollar increases our revenue, but results in a slight reduction in our operating profit. Also, we are now more exposed to movements in the Chinese yuan relative to the euro, so that a change in the Chinese yuan/euro rate will now flow through at a roughly 25% impact on operating profit.

Given the foreign exchange movements in the first quarter, we experienced significantly more reported revenue, but a slight headwind in the P&L as the euro appreciated much more against the dollar than the Chinese yuan.

For the full year, the foreign exchange impact on our revenue based on current FX rates will be approximately $80 million or $55 million more than we estimated at the beginning of the year. However, this additional revenue will add less than $0.01 of operating earnings based on current rates. Of course, the flipside of this dynamic is that if the dollar strengthens versus the euro, reducing our reported revenues, our income will not be materially impacted to the downside.

Despite the current FX environment putting some pressure on operating margins, we continue to expect to deliver strong adjusted operating margin improvements over the remaindering 3 quarters to meet our guided range of 70 to 90 basis points of margin expansion in 2018.

Turning to adjusted earnings per share in the first quarter, we exceeded the midpoint of our guidance range by $0.03 to $0.63, driven primarily by better organic growth and a lower tax rate. The lower tax rate is a result of recently passed Treasury Department guidance on the new tax law that provides a more favorable outcome than we originally anticipated.

Looking further into the key drivers within our segments, for the first quarter, let's start with our Discovery & Analytical Solutions business, where our first quarter results exceeded our expectations, driven by strong high-single-digit organic revenue growth in Life Sciences versus low-single-digit organic revenue growth in the applied market verticals.

Life Science's strength was driven by double-digit growth in both OneSource and our informatics business as well as strong direct discovery sales and high content screening. Applied market growth experienced mid-single-digit growth in food and environmental, but was partially offset by softness in the industrial end markets, which we attribute to the timing of instrument orders.

Switching to Diagnostics. Core Diagnostics revenue grew 4% organically, consistent with our expectations as we experienced strong high single-digit growth in the first quarter last year. In our core Diagnostics business, our infectious disease business, which exclusively serves the emerging markets, continues to show strong growth as it increased mid-teens during the first quarter, with particular strength coming from Haoyuan and Tulip.

The reproductive health business grew mid-single digits, as strength in newborn screening in China was partially offset by difficult comparisons in the U.S. And finally, our applied genomics business was down slightly in the quarter as expected, due to strong microfluidic sales in Q1 of last year.

Broad-based growth across all disease states helped EUROIMMUN exceed organic revenue growth expectations for the quarter, up mid-teens. Geographically for EUROIMMUN, China and Germany were strong, and in the U.S., during the first quarter of this year, we delivered over half of the amount sold during all of last year. We remain confident of future revenue opportunities, driven by a focus on innovation, time-to-market and strong customer focus.

I hope that you've had a chance to read the Nature Scientific Reports article on the feasibility of our rolling-circle-amplification technology from Vanadis for trisomy 21 detection, which we believe to be as accurate as current generation gene sequencing methods.

As Rob mentioned, Vanadis is gathering clinical data for all 3 trisomies as part of their CE mark application, and we continue to expect a second quarter 2018 filing and commercial launch shortly after approval.

Looking down the income statement, adjusted net interest and other expense for the first quarter was approximately $12 million and our adjusted tax rate was approximately 17%, which I referred to -- referenced previously.

Turning to the balance sheet. As we announced, we finished the quarter with approximately $2.1 billion of debt and $180 million of cash. We exited the quarter with a net-debt-to-adjusted EBITDA ratio of approximately 3.4x.

Turning to our cash flow performance. Our first quarter operating cash flow from continuing operations was impacted by the timing of pension payments and earn outs related to Tulip, coupled with a temporary increase in working capital from higher receivables due to new OneSource contracts initiated in the period as well as higher inventory levels, supporting production moves in Singapore and China in the first half of the year. We remain confident in our ability to deliver our full year free cash flow commitment of approximately $365 million.

To wrap up the first quarter, we are very pleased with the solid start to the year as we delivered better-than-expected organic revenue growth, including a stronger-than-expected performance from EUROIMMUN, which continues to outpace the market.

During the quarter, Vanadis achieved all key milestones, and remain on track to launch -- to our launch time line later this year.

Our end markets continue to be a very healthy in both our core and focus areas, and we're encouraged by our ability to build backlog in the quarter.

In addition, we continue to have a good line of sight on adjusted operating margin expansion and free cash flow generation for the remaining 3 quarters, all of which we believe will contribute to a successful 2018 fiscal year for our key stakeholders.

As Rob mentioned, given our results in the first quarter, we are increasing our 2018 revenue and adjusted EPS guidance. We now expect full year 2018 reported revenue to be approximately $2.8 billion, which represents 5% organic growth in the base business, coupled with EUROIMMUN generating approximately $380 million of revenue, which now reflects slightly stronger organic growth and the impact of the current foreign exchange environment.

For the full year, we now expect foreign exchange to be a $65 million tailwind, exclusive of EUROIMMUN revenues, which is $40 million more than we estimated in January.

Our organic revenue growth guidance assumes 6% organic revenue growth in Diagnostics, excluding EUROIMMUN, and 5% in DAS, driven by a mix of Life Sciences and applied markets.

Geographically, we continue to expect mid-single-digit organic revenue growth in the Americas and Europe, with mid- to high single-digit organic revenue growth in Asia.

We're taking up our full year adjusted earnings per share to $3.60, which represents approximately 24% adjusted earnings per share growth. Our new guidance incorporates the first quarter outperformance of $0.03, slightly higher organic growth, which adds approximately $0.02, and we now anticipate a full year tax rate of approximately 17% versus our initial guidance of approximately 18.5%, which adds an incremental $0.05 to the remainder of the year.

For the second quarter of 2018, we're forecasting reported revenues of $680 million, which represents 6% organic revenue from the base business; 15% growth in EUROIMMUN; and foreign exchange of 5%.

In terms of adjusted earnings per share guidance, we are forecasting adjusted earnings per share of $0.86, with minimal benefit from foreign exchange headwinds.

This concludes my prepared remarks. Sarah, at this time, we'd like to open up the call to questions.

Operator

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Tycho Peterson.

T
Tycho Peterson
analyst

I guess I'll kick it off, Andy, just say congrats and wish you the best on the transition.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Thank you for that.

T
Tycho Peterson
analyst

As it relates to EUROIMMUN, a couple of quick questions here. Can you maybe talk about what we should be assuming for contributions from the U.S. ramp for the business? And then, are you willing to comment at all on the headlines around buying some assets from Siemens in Europe?

F
Frank Wilson
executive

So I -- Tycho, the ramp in U.S. will continue to be fairly significantly, but, of course, it's off a relatively small base. So what we're seeing in the U.S. is growth in the sort of 40% to 50% range for the year. But I think as we've said in the past, it will take a little while before it sort of ramps up to the level of significance. But they're making good traction. With regard to the Siemens discussion, I think at any point in time, the people at EUROIMMUN and particularly, Winfried Stöcker, who as you know, is the Founder, is continuing to look at ways to invest in the future and to support a significant growth. In any given year, EUROIMMUN hires anywhere from 175 to 200 engineers to support the growth that they've had historically, which is -- as you know, has been in the sort of the high teens. What happened in the Siemens situation is apparently they are looking to exit a facility in the southern part of Germany, and Winfried had some discussions with them, where we might assume some of those engineers, or, in fact, some of the facilities. But it's only at a discussion phase right now. And the way I would think about it is, just sort of thinking out a couple of years, and saying to the extent that we need to continue to get engineering capability and space, this may be a way to do that. And by the way, we're also wondering if the German government might sort of participate in those transition costs. But nothing definitively; this is just as a discussion phase right now.

T
Tycho Peterson
analyst

Okay. That's helpful. And then for the follow-up, you called out the softness in industrial. I know it's only 17%-or-so, the DAS business, but can you maybe just talk a little bit about where you think things are headed for that part of the portfolio?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes, I mean, I think it's a little bit of timing, particularly, and where we saw a little bit of weakness was in the chemical sector. I mean -- but I would say, industrial for us, was just down slightly in the quarter, and I would attribute to more sort of timing of instrument orders. It seems like the market overall is pretty good. We actually saw sort of growth in the U.S. and the weakness was really more in sort of Europe and Asia.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Sarah, before the next call, I just want to clarify something I said, and you can attribute it to old age, being my last call, but the guidance for Q2 top line is $695 million, and I believe I said $680 million. But I want to make sure that I confirm that our top line guidance for the second quarter is $695 million. Thanks.

Operator

Our next question comes from Patrick Donnelly.

P
Patrick Donnelly
analyst

Maybe just one on China. I think guidance coming into the year was for high-single, low double-digit growth there, coming off another strong quarter of high teens growth, it's been well above kind of that guidance rate for a few quarters here. So maybe just update us on your thoughts on the region there. Obviously, has been some macro noise, so wondering how you're feeling about the environment. What markets you're feeling good about and again, just how you're feeling relative to the guidance?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes, I think China continues to be a great market for us. When you look at the growth, as I think Andy mentioned, it was mid-teens. It was, again pretty broad-based. All of the -- if you break it into Diagnostics, Life Sciences and applied markets, they were all double-digit or better. So I think we continue to be excited about the opportunities there. I think going into the year, we were a little sort of cautious, and I think we still continue to sort of look out for the back half, and again, just be sort of I would say cautious about it. But I suspect rather than high single, China will probably be at least double digits and maybe will get up in the mid-teens. The other thing I would say is EUROIMMUN continues to do very well there as well. I think in the first quarter, they were more in the high teens. So we continue to see good demand and like I said, pretty broad-based.

P
Patrick Donnelly
analyst

Okay. And then, maybe just on the capital allocation side, had a little bit of share repurchase activity this quarter, in spite of the recent EUROIMMUN deal, so I'm just wondering how you guys are feeling about where you are on the leverage landscape. And then with Jim coming in, any changes we should expect on the capital allocation side?

R
Robert Friel
executive

No, I don't think there'll be a change. I think we still have a preference to add to the franchises with some bolt-ons. As I think I've said in the past, unlikely that you would see us go and do what I would call a large deal right now. So I think our preference is to continue to delever a little bit, but it will be bolt-on acquisitions. And then I think, as we've said in the past, at a minimum, we'll try and keep the share count flat. So to the extent that we see a little float up because of either stock price increases or option exercise, we'd probably take that out. But I would say no intention right now to significantly reduce the shares outstanding.

Operator

Our next question comes from Ross Muken.

R
Ross Muken
analyst

Andy, congrats.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Thanks, Ross.

R
Ross Muken
analyst

And just in terms of the margin cadence, obviously, after Q1, it's a pretty big sequential step up in Q2; at least on our math, doesn't imply a ton of expansion. So I guess, one, could you confirm my math, that it seems sort of 2 way equated? I guess we had some unique dynamics in 4Q of last year, so maybe that's an easy comp. But also, is it the math around just the timing of EUROIMMUN business, which obviously has a weak seasonal Q1 and then steps up, that the incremental drop-through from that piece kind of gets better sequentially? Or is there something else kind of in play on that cadence?

F
Frank Wilson
executive

No. I think you have described it exactly as we anticipate it rolling out. First quarter being EUROIMMUN's seasonally lowest quarter, it had, obviously, a dampening effect, as well as the -- as FX. I think we'll see, as we get into the second quarter, that more at the higher end of the range. It will ramp through the year as we make progress with EUROIMMUN. And as you can do the math, it will be over 100 basis points a quarter. Fourth quarter being a little bit of an anomaly where it's an easier comp. So I think all the things you highlighted are kind of how we're thinking about it as well.

R
Ross Muken
analyst

That's helpful. And could you just also confirm, because there's a bunch of different pieces because you gave kind of the organics and M&A contribution with or without EUROIMMUN. Was EUROIMMUN about $80 million or -- give or take in the quarter, including the organic growth?

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Correct. It was actually $82 million. It will be in our quarterly filing.

R
Ross Muken
analyst

Got it. And just quickly on sort of the base Diagnostics business. So 4%, you came off of an 8% comp last year. Sequentially, much easier. So I guess, this will be probably the low point for the year, is that sort of the view on that segment?

R
Robert Friel
executive

I think that's right. And we're looking at sort of second quarter 6, and then it sort of continues to sort of ramp-up from there.

Operator

Our next question comes from Derik De Bruin.

D
Derik De Bruin
analyst

Once again, Andy, it's been a pleasure. Good luck.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Thanks, Derik.

D
Derik De Bruin
analyst

Just to follow up on Ross's question. So the core Diagnostics organic revenue number, the one that we all sort of [ hedge ] because we're not adding back pro forma contributions to EUROIMMUN, it's about 4% in the quarter. Is that what it was?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes.

D
Derik De Bruin
analyst

Okay. So the 4% number is...

R
Robert Friel
executive

And the way we think about that is reproductive health was sort of mid-single, and to Ross's point, it was a little bit of a difficult comp in the area. Our infectious disease business, which you know is basically China and India, was up mid-teens, and we saw sort of just a little slight degradation in what we call applied genomics, and it was really driven by the microfluidics business which had some difficult comps in the prior year. And that can have a tendency to be a little bit cyclical because there's instruments involved. But reproductive was mid-single, infectious disease was mid-teens.

D
Derik De Bruin
analyst

Okay, great. And then just 2 follow up questions on the Diagnostics. The -- I guess, what's the next milestone for Vanadis? And the overall -- I mean, what you think that genomics business will contribute this year?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So the next milestone for Vanadis is clearly getting CE marked. And I think as we've said, we're expecting that -- I don't know if it'll happen before the end of this quarter, but hopefully, by early third quarter. And so the idea would be to then be able to sell that out in the back half of the year. We don't have huge sort of expectations for that business in the second half, but call it sort of $5 million, $10 million, in that type of range. Your second question was referred to the genetic testing business. Are you talking about with regard to 2018 or longer-term? 2018...

D
Derik De Bruin
analyst

2018, since it's a brand-new business.

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes, 2018, we're targeting sort of $8 million to $10 million.

Operator

Our next question comes from Doug Schenkel.

D
Doug Schenkel
analyst

Well, first off, I want to welcome Jamey and I also want to thank Andy for all his hard work and help over the years, and congratulations on moving onto the next stage of things. So in terms of my questions, just I guess, a couple end-market questions to start. Following up on the industrial end-market commentary and an earlier question, was weakness more pronounced in any specific geography? And would you be willing to comment on bookings in the segment, in the quarter? And whether or not you've changed your assumption for that end-market growth in the context to full year guidance?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So first of all, industrial was down about 1%. So just to sort of calibrate things a little bit. So it was up around mid-single digits in the Americas. It was sort of flattish in Europe, and it was down a little bit in APAC. That was the geographic split. And I think I mentioned before, it was probably most pronounced in the chemicals or petrochemical side of the business. And again, I think that was probably just timing of instrument orders. I would say for the year, we think industrial's probably low to mid-single-digit growth.

D
Doug Schenkel
analyst

Okay. Super helpful. And then in terms of the organic outperformance in the quarter, it sounds like, generally speaking, Life Sciences was the key contributor by end market. Is that right? And if so, can you talk about whether a big part of this is your new products potentially tracking ahead of plan in terms of their contribution to the quarter?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes. So first of all, you're correct; it was Life Sciences. It was particularly in the pharma and biotech area. Having said that though, our academic and government was up sort of 6%, which was nice to see. But really, the over performance came in pharmaceutical and specifically in the service and informatics side of the business. And I sort of talked a little bit about that is, some of that was new products, it was ChemDraw, it was the new Signals offering. But we are starting to get some nice traction as we think we're somewhat uniquely situated with regard to being able to sort of meet this need that some of the pharmaceutical companies are saying to sort of what -- the buzzword is digitalization of the lab. But it's really trying to make sure that they're getting the right information out of their instruments. And so it's a combination of having the ability to provide the sort of OneSource capability, but at the same time, some of the analytics and electronic notebook capabilities said that we've had historically. And so that really what drove some of the upside performance in the first quarter.

D
Doug Schenkel
analyst

Okay. And lastly, I guess, a similar question on EUROIMMUN. Could you break down how much of the strength in the quarter was a function of, let's say, new assays, new customers and, I guess, those 2 things versus existing customers increasing utilization?

R
Robert Friel
executive

No. I don't have the visibility into the customer. What I can tell you though is the growth was broad-based geographically. So whether you're looking China, EMEA or North America, it was all sort of double digits. I would also say that the growth was pretty broad-based across their sort of diseases. So if you look at autoimmune, if you look at allergy, if you look infectious disease, they also saw nice growth. So it was pretty, like I said, broad-based, but I couldn't tell you what the split was between new or existing customers.

Operator

Our next question comes from Steve Beuchaw.

S
Steve Beuchaw
analyst

And I'll certainly go ahead and echo the thanks and congratulations to Andy. Really appreciate everything.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Sure. Thanks, Bob (sic) [ Steve ].

S
Steve Beuchaw
analyst

I wonder, just as we try to tune up our models one last time, if you could give us any more quantification on the impact of EUROIMMUN at the EBIT margin line in the quarter? And maybe some updated thinking on how that progresses over the balance of the year, given the seasonality for EUROIMMUN.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Yes, well we talked in my prepared remarks, it was around 30 basis points, 20 to 30 basis points of headwind on the corporation. That will flip as we make progress through the year and become -- it will ramp through the year. The fourth quarter for EUROIMMUN will be the largest impact. So it will go from, let's say, negative 30 to I would say something in the 50 to 75 basis points as we exit the year.

S
Steve Beuchaw
analyst

Perfect. And then, Rob, I wonder if you could take the conversation around Vanadis a couple of more steps. Maybe the data that you saw in the Nature communications article weren't particularly surprising to you. They were certainly better than we had even hoped for. How has the data that you've seen so far and in some of your preliminary conversations impacting your thinking on how that assay ought to be priced and how big the potential market is, where Vanadis would be a logical fit?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So I think you're -- obviously, we were pleased to see the success of the study. But I think, from a pricing standpoint, and I know everybody's been anxious to see that and we'll have that out soon, is we've said for a long period of time, the purpose of this product is really to replace screening as compared to a diagnostic test. So we want to make sure -- again, the goal here is to really go out into the biochemical labs, so the labs that are doing biochemical screening today, with both a simpler workflow as well as a cost structure that is close to that. So again, stay tuned. But that's our thought process around that. And again, the whole theory here is to make sure that the sensitivity of Vanadis is at least similar to the current NGS assays. I think we have some arguments as to why we think it's actually better in a number of areas, but we want to make sure at a minimum, that it's similar, but -- and the argument is it's easier from a workflow perspective and much more economical. With regard to the market, I mean, I think we feel -- I mean, just as a rough guide, we've said if we can take 15% to 20% of the market, we think that's close to $1 billion.

Operator

Our next question comes from Dan Arias.

D
Daniel Arias
analyst

Rob, on the Diagnostics side, can you just add a little color to what you're seeing in the genetic testing expansion? How much of that early business is just due to having the samples in hand and being able to leverage that? Is that something that you're finding is working for you? I know that the thesis going in was kind of that exact idea; just that you would be able to benefit from some of the other business that you're doing.

R
Robert Friel
executive

I think that's part of it. But I would say when you look at the ramp-up, it's been not only in the newborn and the ViaCord business, but we are attracting pharmaceutical companies. We are attracting collaborations. And I think the reason for that is what we had mentioned before is that we provide not only the genetic analysis, but we show the protein or biochemical analysis. And what we're finding is that's distinctive in the marketplace, and I think that's becoming very attractive to a number of the collaborators and customers.

D
Daniel Arias
analyst

Okay. And then maybe, Andy, if I could just ask you one final question before you go, I guess it would just be what are you expecting for interest income this year?

F
Frank Wilson
executive

I think we -- right now, we're looking at net interest income at about 60 -- just north of $60 million. Oh, expense.

R
Robert Friel
executive

Expense is 60.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Yes, expense, that's net interest expense. Net interest income, was that the question? Sorry.

D
Daniel Arias
analyst

That's right.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

That's going to be around $10 million.

Operator

Our next question -- I'm sorry.

F
Frank Wilson
executive

That's interest income and other.

Operator

Our next question comes from William March.

W
William March
analyst

On EUROIMMUN, could you just talk a little bit about the America opportunity? With it coming off of a small base and saying that it's going to take some time to develop, is that kind of driven by getting approvals of a critical mass of assays or an instrument? Just maybe what are some goalposts to think about for that becoming a more significant contributor?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes, I think that's a piece of it. I mean, part of it is getting the regulatory approvals. I think as we've talked in the past, that was not an area that EUROIMMUN had invested significantly in. So I think combined now, we have a much more formidable regulatory capability. And I think we've already filed, since the closing, some 18 submissions to the FDA. And I mentioned we're excited about getting 2 of them out already, but -- so that's a big piece of it. I think the other piece of it is just expanding your commercial presence in the U.S. market and, I mean, I think that the sales force within EUROIMMUN was probably 10 people or something. And so that's just getting their sort of opening, helping them open some doors, getting them a little bit more sort of brand recognition out there. And then I mentioned the other piece was we've now transitioned all of their -- the service of all of their instruments to PerkinElmer. So I think that's helpful from the standpoint of not only cost but responsiveness to the customers. So I think there's a number of components just increasing awareness, so in some of the trade shows, the combined presence of PKI and EUROIMMUN, I think, is helpful as well. So branding, presence, regulatory, I think those are the main drivers.

W
William March
analyst

Great. And then on the whole genome servicing business, can you maybe just talk a little bit about that opportunity in terms of the $8 million to $10 million in revenues? You've talked about the collaboration with Helix. As you think about that offering, is it more about trying to drive that as a stand-alone business or part-bundling that with some of your other products and services to try and drive maybe more incremental revenues?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So it's really both. And I think one of the reasons we were sort of comfortable starting this is because we have a bundling opportunity. We've talked about it in the past that, as you know, we do the screening for newborn, and very often, the confirmatory test is done through sequencing. So by us now doing the sequencing, we can do both the screening and the confirmatory. I think that was sort of a natural bundling opportunity that was sort of captive business we could go after. Similarly with ViaCord, we've had a number of customers approach us to see whether or not that was something we could do. So we started the business with the understanding that we had sort of some captive business we could go after. But at the same time, we thought that there was an opportunity to go out and get incremental business. And that was some of the things we talked about before, was working with pharmaceutical companies and working with the Helixes of the world, et cetera. And we're starting to see that ramp nicely. So I think if you look at our $8 million to $10 million of revenue this year, it could be fairly evenly split between both of those opportunities.

Operator

Our next question comes from Steve Willoughby with Cleveland Research.

S
Steve Willoughby
analyst

Two questions for you. I guess, first, regarding your comments regarding the pharma strength being driven by service and informatics, I was just wondering if you could provide a little bit more color there, on whether that's kind of penetrating existing customers more, share gains, or more greenfield opportunity?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So in the informatics area, I think it was penetrating new customers and a little bit of, I mentioned, so we had some new products come out with ChemDraw in particular, and we saw a nice renewal from existing customers. So I would say in the informatics, a little bit of both. I would say on the service side, it's probably mostly with existing customers, where we continue to expand how -- what we're doing with those customers. But having said that, we do get periodically some nice wins and one in particular, we're ramping up in 2018.

S
Steve Willoughby
analyst

Okay. And then I think at least 1 or 2 times, you made the comment regarding building backlog. And just trying to see if there's any more color on that related to your other comments, talking about some timing of orders within your more industrial business. And I guess a follow-on to that is just some of your newer equipment system products, I was just wondering if there's any comment on how those are doing out of the gate so far.

R
Robert Friel
executive

I would say the timing in the backlog was probably more in reference to some of the markets that were a little slower in the quarter, most notably the industrial. I would also say food, as we talked about, was mid-single. I think as we sort of look out for the year, I think that will be a bit better than that. And then I would say the third area was, I mentioned in our core Diagnostics business that our applied genomics business was actually down a little bit. I think for the year that's probably going to be a high single, low double-digit grower. And so that's where we saw some pretty good bookings in the first quarter and we think that will build through the year.

Operator

Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.

S
S. Brandon Couillard
analyst

Quick one for you, Andy. In terms of the recent EUR 300 million note offering, are you assuming that you're not paying down any incremental debt with that? Because otherwise, I think there would have been some benefit to the net interest expense outlook for the year. And then secondly, the CapEx spike in the first quarter, was some of that EUROIMMUN timing-related, and what should we pencil in for the full year?

F
Frank Wilson
executive

Well, there's 2 things going on. One is we did pay down the revolver but it is -- the net impact on net interest expense was offset by FX. So there really wasn't much savings. As far as capital is concerned, a little bit of that is timing. We have a couple of fairly big initiatives that we started beginning of this year; I think that will normalize. And some of EUROIMMUN's capital hit in the first quarter. So I think we still feel like that we're going to be within our guidelines on capital for the year. And as a result, we still think we can get to $365 million. So it's really mainly timing.

Operator

Our next question comes from Bill Quirk.

W
William Quirk
analyst

First question, just thinking, Andy, about some of comments you made around EUROIMMUN's European or euro-denominated cost base and revenue exposure in China. Have you guys considered at all moving some manufacturing to China, not unlike what you're doing with some of the DAS businesses?

R
Robert Friel
executive

Yes, absolutely. I mean, and EUROIMMUN had already been working on that. So they are in the process of finalizing a fairly large facility in Tianjin. And similar to our approach, which is to continue to ramp-up manufacturing in China and sort of make products in China for China. So that'll probably come online later this year, but because with the regulatory approval, we probably won't see a lot of revenue from that factory probably until '19. But that's exactly what we're trying to do, is to sort of shift some of those euro costs -- euro-based cost to Chinese yuan-based.

W
William Quirk
analyst

Okay, perfect. And then secondly, and just staying in EUROIMMUN for a moment, you talked about a number of regulatory approvals in the states to try to expand the portfolio here. Can you just help us think a little bit about should we expect a fairly even metering of assays over the coming, call it, 3 years? Or are you trying to push a bolus out here in '18? Just trying to get a sense, both from an R&D spend as well as how should we think about that U.S. franchise growth.

R
Robert Friel
executive

Well, I think there's initially a little bolus because, quite frankly, there was a little of pent-up demand, if you will, so. And we've been working hard and trying to get those out as quickly as possible. And I think I mentioned, we -- I think we filed some 18 or so in the last 3 months. So I don't know that we'll see that type of pace going forward. Having said that, it's a little difficult, as you can appreciate, sort of determining how they hit the market because we're dependent on the FDA regulatory approval, which seems to be getting better. But we'll just have to wait and see. But clearly, there was a much larger amount in the first quarter. But we hope it to be sort of a steady pace. But probably not at the level you saw in the last 90 days.

Operator

Our next question comes from Dan Leonard.

D
Daniel Leonard
analyst

Rob, can you update us on your thinking around portfolio pruning? Is there anything we should expect in the scope for 2018?

R
Robert Friel
executive

I don't think there's going to be anything of significance. We've talked a little bit about pruning some things within DAS, and I think we'll continue to look at those. But I don't know that they'll be that material. If I had to give you a number, could it be $50 million, could it be $75 million, it could be something like that, but it's not going to -- I don't know that's it's going to be significant.

D
Daniel Leonard
analyst

Okay. And then secondly, on Vanadis, can you comment on what publication waterfall looks like through the balance of the year? Are you expecting further papers? And what would the cadence look like?

R
Robert Friel
executive

I think there's 2 that are sort of in the works right now that we would hope to see in the next -- again, this is a little difficult to predict, but probably in the next 60 days or so. And then there is -- I think there's a number that we expect to come out sort of latter in the year. So maybe in the course of 2018, we'll see 3 or 4.

Operator

Okay, our next question comes from Jack Meehan.

M
Mitchell Petersen
analyst

This is actually Mitch Petersen on for Jack this afternoon. On the newborn screening business, could you just elaborate on what you're trending in terms of birth rates? And then how [ touch ] utilization is trying to influence some of the EM regions?

R
Robert Friel
executive

So first of all, I would say the newborn business continues to do pretty well but it's not because of birth rates. It's because we continue to make either expansion of menus or expansion of penetration. If you look in the U.S, I think birth rates are probably trending down 1 point to 1.5. And if you look in China, for '17, they were down, we would say, sort of 3. In fact, you may have seen the article in the Journal today. And there was a recent article in The Economist that talks about the challenge that China has right now with their growth targets as their birth rates have sort of been suppressed here a little bit. So that's something that obviously is a bigger issue than just newborn screening. But -- so it's not being driven -- the sort of growth in the newborn business right now is not being driven by birth rates globally, but like I said, on the other aspects of it.

M
Mitchell Petersen
analyst

Helpful. And then, I'm talking M&A, could you just elaborate on some of the areas where you would potentially like to add to the portfolio?

R
Robert Friel
executive

I would go back and reinforce here is that we've talked about the sort of strategic priorities for growth. So when we look across the diagnostic businesses, continuing to build out our capabilities in emerging markets is obviously something that's interesting to us. I think our applied genomics area is an area where we think there's a significant opportunity to expand our capabilities. I would sort of spike those 2 out in the DAS area. Clearly, in the pharma services area, where I think we've built a nice portfolio. Food, we believe is very attractive, and combined with the fact that it's a fairly fragmented industry, I think provides a lot of opportunity for us. And I would say in the analytical instrument area, anything that could sort of build out our consumable revenue would be something we would be very interested in.

Operator

That concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Rob Friel for any further remarks.

R
Robert Friel
executive

So first of all, appreciate and thanks for all your questions. And so in closing, let me just reinforce that we're all excited about the opportunities moving ahead and confident in the terrific team of employees around the world who are committed to not only driving our mission, but creating even greater value for our shareholders. So thank you for your interest in PerkinElmer, and have a great evening.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.