GFL Environmental Inc
NYSE:GFL
GFL Environmental Inc
In the ever-evolving landscape of waste management, GFL Environmental Inc. has carved a significant niche for itself. Emerging from its Canadian roots, GFL—Green For Life—has rapidly expanded its footprint across North America, establishing itself as a formidable player in the environmental services arena. Founded in 2007 by Patrick Dovigi, GFL has strategically pursued a multi-faceted growth strategy that combines organic expansion with a robust acquisition pipeline. This approach enables the company to offer a wide range of services, including solid and liquid waste collection, transfer, recycling, infrastructure, and soil remediation. By targeting both urban and rural markets, GFL extends its service offerings to a diverse clientele ranging from municipalities and industrial clients to individual households. This segmented approach has been key to maintaining a steady revenue stream while accommodating seasonal and economic fluctuations.
At the core of GFL’s operations lies its commitment to sustainability and innovation. Connecting these values with financial imperatives, GFL creates value by transforming waste into useful resources through its recycling and composting initiatives. By doing so, it not only reduces landfill dependency but also taps into potentially lucrative secondary markets for recycled materials. Additionally, GFL’s liquid waste services capture another layer of revenue, processing everything from automotive and industrial liquid waste to hazardous materials, using state-of-the-art treatment facilities. These diverse revenue streams ensure that GFL is well-positioned to capitalize on the growing global emphasis on environmental stewardship, all while maintaining a profitable business model that aligns economic success with ecological responsibility.
Earnings Calls
This earnings call has not been analyzed yet.
If you’d like us to analyze this earnings call, click the "Request Earnings Call Analysis" button below.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Please standby, we're about to begin. Good day and welcome to the Polyus Third Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded.
At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Victor Drozdov. Please go ahead.
Thanks a lot. Hi, everyone. Welcome to our conference call for the third quarter financial results. Today, we have our CFO here with us. So Mikhail provide valuable comments on the financial results for the third quarter as well as we'll be answering your questions.
With that in mind, I'll pass the floor to Mikhail. Please go ahead.
Yes. Hello and thank you for joining our call. So I'll take you briefly through the key highlights of the quarter. So the revenue in the third quarter was $1.4 billion which is a 12% increase on the preceding quarter. That's a reflection of the underlying traditional performance across all of the deposits and total gold output has increased of this period by approximately 15% to 770,000 ounces.
Now looking at our sales in the third quarter, we sold approximately 760,000 ounces of refined gold which implies a 14% increase on the previous quarter. And we also sold approximately 11,000 ounces of gold contained in flotation concentrate during the period. Now our quarterly EBITDA increased to approximately US$1 billion which is up 10% quarter-on-quarter. In terms of our quarterly cost performance, as expected, we saw a step-up in our TCC figure as we highlighted during the previous calls. TCC rose by 9% quarter-on-quarter to $427 per ounce. In terms of key factors which I would like to underscore. First there is going to be a seasonal increase in output at the Alluvials operations. Secondly, inflation in cost consumables and spare parts. Next would be lower byproduct credit which amounted to our $5 per ounce in the third quarter versus $10 per ounce in the second quarter. And also finally, a cessation of the regional project regime at Verninskoye from August 2021. And that increased applicable MET rate from 2.4% to 6%.
Now in terms of positive developments, I would like to separately highlight the remarkable cost performance at Natalka. On a stand-alone basis, you see it was approximately $340 per ounce and that's the lowest number across operations during the period. And also our throughput at the mill reached a record high of 1,555 tons per hour in the reporting period which is mainly driven by operational enhancements and reduced circulation load at the combination circle.
Now, moving on to the cost performance for the first nine months. TCC is $403 ounce. That's a 10% increase over the respective period of 2020. So in terms of sort of major factors leading to a cost increase year-on-year, that would be a temporary decline in head grades at Olimpiada, inflation of consumables, substantially lower maintenance spending in 2020 given the COVID-19 restrictions and also changes in the mill extraction tax at Natalka and Verninskoye. Now we previously guided the range of $425 to $450 as a TCC for the fiscal year and that remains unchanged at this time. Just to remind you, that's based on RUB65 as an exchange rate and gold price of $1,300.
Now moving on to CapEx; we accelerated CapEx spending in the quarter as again, we highlighted to you at our calls. So we spent approximately US$230 million compared to approximately US$180 million in the preceding quarter. Just to sort of point out a few important developments, we acquired nine 220-tonne Caterpillar trucks for Olimpiada during the period and we also completed the construction of the pit stop for trucks maintenance on-site. And we also implemented a range of initiatives targeting achievement of 15 million tons in annualized capacity at Olimpiada from next year onwards and also initiatives aimed at improving efficiency of the BIO station complex. In terms of our CapEx guidance for the entire year, it remains unchanged at between US$1 billion and US$1.1 billion. Year-to-date, we spent approximately $540 million. And we are counting on a strong catch-up in the fourth quarter and we are comfortable it will take place.
We're also advancing our growth projects in accordance with the schedule. In terms of our developments at Mill-5, our largest brownfield project, we signed an agreement with a major contractor after construction. It's a Turkish company that has a proven track record of successfully operating at the major projects in Russia. And in terms of on-site activities, we completed the site preparation for the conveyor system and we are progressing with the construction of the crushed ore stockyard. We're also on track with the expansion initiatives at other operations. Namely at Olimpiada, we will reach a stable throughput capacity of 15 million tons in 2022. And at Kuranakh, we are on track to reach 7.5 million tons in capacity from 2024 onwards.
Now in terms of balance sheet, our figures, the cash on balance was up to almost US$1.7 billion. Our net debt came down to US$1.95 billion and our net debt-to-EBITDA ratio stood at 0.5x. In terms of free cash flow, free cash flow was approximately $470 million of levered free cash flow during the period which is basically flat over the second quarter number. Now as we mentioned at our previous call, we completed a whole number of proactive debt management initiatives after the close of the reporting period. So we issued Eurobonds in the overall amount of $700 million. And that's a 2028 maturity and the coupon rate is 3.25%. Secondly, we also launched a tender for approximately $600 million worth of outstanding Eurobonds and we also repaid some of the bilateral lines.
Now in terms of COVID-19-related developments, we allocated approximately $14 million to COVID prevention measures in the quarter. And overall, the annual tally will be approximately $100 million. So in terms of the impact of the COVID-related interruptions, there was indeed a shortage of shipping containers in China. We are facing extended transit times given the congestion of seaports at the Russian Far East. That's increasing the lead times for the consumables and spare parts. However, we are not seeing anything critical and anything that will substantially affect our cost line. Now in terms of sort of a quick update on the ESG front. So our scores continued to improve across all key ratings. So in November, we received a score of 57 and S&P Global CSA and Sustainalytics ESG Risk Rating of 25.0. And also MSCI confirmed our MSCI ESG rating at A.
That's all as for the management comments and we are ready to take your questions.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Dan Shaw with Morgan Stanley.
Hi, thanks for taking my questions. Just a couple for me. And first one, just on the guidance. Just a quick clarification. In the press release that you noted that the ruble assumption underpinning your guidance number as $65. So is it fair for us to assume that CapEx and costs will come at the lower end of those ranges? That's the first question. And then just one second one on ESG. As you just mentioned it, when can we expect to the next sort of major update in terms of setting out your medium and longer-term targets, do you have a date in mind for that?
Hello, Dan. So in terms of ForEx assumption which underpins our guidance, that's indeed $65. So in terms of factual figures, given the spot or near spot ruble rate which, as you are quite aware, it's fairly volatile. You can reasonably expect that our TCC -- factual TCC will be below $425. And our CapEx figure will be at the lower end of the guidance. Again, assuming the sort of factual exchange rate. Now at $65, our TCC will be closer to the lower end. And our CapEx figure will be right in the mid of the provided guidance of $1 billion to $1.1 billion. Now in terms of sort of major ESG announcements, I think we will provide an update to the market around second quarter of next year.
Great. Thanks very much.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from Boris Sinitsyn with Ren Cap.
Hi gentlemen [ph]. Thanks. Just one question from my side, please. You mentioned the -- some disruptions in the supply chain, not affecting your costs so far. The question is, do you expect those to be continued in 2022? And do you think it might affect CapEx basically, not costs?
Well, first of all, we need to separate the sort of the interruptions in terms of transit time and the shipments and pricing effects. So -- and I said that the interruptions related to shipment and transit times are not materially affecting our cost line. They are obviously bearing a certain effect but again, it's fairly small. We are seeing an increase in the delivery time lines but we're seeing some delays for spare parts but again, there is nothing critical that we're seeing at this point. And obviously, there is nothing which can, to any extent, affect that continuity of the operations. That said, the cost inflation per se is a major challenge for the sector and that pertains to consumables, that pertains to labor domestically and that pertains to equipment and spare parts. Now that has been offset by the fact that we have long-term contracts for all of the consumables and they have fixed -- they have a mix of fixed and variable pricing which is providing an important buffer against the recent market developments. That said, still a certain part of the ongoing cost escalation will have to be absorbed by us as the consumer.
So, I would say that in terms of 2022 projections, CapEx is -- CapEx spending is not affected to the same extent as our OpEx. Because for capital spending, we have contracted most of the equipment and also most of the outside construction services. So we are fairly safe there. And the brunt of cost inflation will be felt through the P&L. But again, that is offset by the optimization initiatives and will be mitigated at least partially. Thank you.
Very clear. Thank you so much.
We'll take our next question from Yuriy Vlasov with Sova Capital.
Many, thanks. Two very quick questions from me. First, could you give us any breakdown of your Mill-5 at Blagodatnoye. How is it stretched across the years? And remind us what's the timing on Sukhoi Log feasibility study? When can we expect the next milestone there?
Yuriy, can you repeat your first question on Blagodatnoye? I mean...
Yes. Could you give us a CapEx breakdown on Blagodatnoye across the years? So how it's spread across the next three, four years, roughly -- in very rough estimates?
When talk about Blagodatnoye, obviously, you're talking about Mill-5, obviously, not about Mill-4?
Yes, yes, yes, Mill-5.
Well, the bulk of the spending will be taking place in 2023 and 2024. Spending rates in 2022 will be broadly comparable to 2021. Now secondly, in terms of Sukhoi Log feasibility, I think the major development will be obviously the approval of the feasibility study. That is slated to take place towards the end of the -- towards the end of the next year. We are confirming that we are on track. Now if there are any important developments that sort of take place until that date that warrant market attention, we will immediately inform you. But what we can relay to you at this point is that we are on track in terms of all of the milestones that we set previously. That pertains to engineering and that pertains to geological studies and that pertains to the study of the requisite infrastructure.
Sorry, a quick follow-up. Have you done -- have you completed your drilling on Sukhoi Log or is it still in the process?
Yuriy, can you repeat that again, sorry? What's the question on...
Have you completed the drilling on -- this is the question -- is it still work in process?
Well, the majority of the drilling that is required for the feasibility study has been completed with the perfected translation against the resource model. We have some outstanding drilling which is being done at the flanks but that's not required for the feasibility study. That is basically for the -- sort of, for the operations well beyond 2035. Thank you.
Okay. Many, thanks.
We'll take our next question from Nina Dergunova with Goldman Sachs.
Good day. Thank you very much for answering the questions. Most of my questions have been replied already; probably a few from my side. First one on consolidated CapEx guidance for next year. At the CMD, you mentioned that CapEx could increase about 10% and you also said now that for Blagodatnoye Mill-5 spending is stable. Can you name which major projects can trigger this 10% increase in CapEx next year?
Right. So the major increase will be at Sukhoi Log and that also will be at Kuranakh as we are commissioning the construction of the 7.5 project. And then all sort of items but nothing particularly material.
And what about stripping? What stripping do you expect and I acknowledge that this guidance that you provided us does include stripping?
This is not -- does not incorporate our stripping expense. Now in terms of sort of projections, the fourth quarter figure will be very much comparable to the average quarterly number during the first nine months and 2022 figure will be comparable to 2021 figure.
Understood. And the second question from my side. This year is a challenging year for Krasnoyarsk business units with lower grade recoveries. Can you give a scale of improvement in grades and recoveries next year?
Yes. Well, I think we'll be able sort of to provide a more precise guidance when we announce our figures for the 2021 fiscal year. Now what we guided previously is that there will be a substantial rebound in grades in 2022 and there will be a further increase in head grades in 2023 and that remains the case. So, Krasnoyarsk will see a stronger performance next year.
That is clear. Thank you very much. That's it for my side.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] At this time, there are no additional questions in the queue.
Yes. Thanks, all guys, for attending our conference call. Once again, if you have any further follow-up questions, just drop us a line. So we're going to be waiting for those questions. Thanks a lot. Cheers. Bye.
That will conclude today's call. We appreciate your participation.