EPR Properties
NYSE:EPR
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
39.76
49.39
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
EPR Properties
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Q2 2018 EPR Properties Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Craig Evans, General Counsel. Sir, you may begin.
Hello, everyone. This is Craig Evans, General Counsel for EPR Properties. I am filling in for Brian Moriarty, who is out this week. Thank you for joining us today for our second quarter 2018 earnings call. I’ll start the call by informing you that this call may include forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Identified by such words as "intend," "continue," "believe," "may," "expect," "hope," "anticipate," or other comparable terms. The Company’s actual financial condition and results of operations may vary from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements, discussion of these factors that could cause results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are contained in the Company’s SEC filings including the Company’s reports on Form 10-K and 10-Q.
Now, I’ll turn the call over to company President and CEO, Greg Silvers.
Thank you, Craig. And good morning. Welcome to our second quarter 2018 earnings call. Before we get started, I’ll remind everyone that slides are available to follow along via our website at www.eprkc.com.
With me on the call today is the company’s CFO, Mark Peterson who will review the company’s financial summary.
Good morning.
As always, I'll start with our quarterly headlines then discuss the business in greater detail. So let's get started. The first headline. Record quarterly revenue and earnings. We are pleased to continue the refrain of highlighting record setting results. As compared to the same quarter previous year, our topline revenue grew by 37% and FFO as adjusted per share grew by 45%. This ongoing strong performance is supported by our differentiated portfolio of high quality assets and the underlying strength of each of our investment segments.
Our second headline, successfully executing our capital recycling strategy. One of our fundamental principles is prudent and disciplined capital management. As such, in February during our 2017 year-end call we communicated our capital plan for 2018 which mitigated the need to raise any additional equity capital given our stock price at the time.
We have substantially delivered on our recycling strategy and with our recent stock price recovery we are now positioned to tap either source, as we begin to turn to a more favorable growth posture.
Third headline, recent results reflect strong tenant performance. The box office has established a strong pace for the year. Our ski properties delivered a solid year and the strong performance of our attractions was rewarded with a credit upgrade following the announcement of Six Flags assuming five of our leases.
We are pleased with their near term strength, but more importantly, as we spoke about previously, we take a long-term view with these properties and they continue to demonstrate to consumers preference for experiential assets.
Fourth headline, increasing earnings guidance. We're happy to announce that we are increasing our earnings guidance, while the significant increase is driven primarily by the contribution from additional prepayment fees, it's important to note that our core business remains very healthy. Mark, will have more detail on this topic.
Now, I'll discuss the business in more detail. At the end of the second quarter, our investments were $6.7 billion with 396 properties and services that were 99% occupied. During the quarter, investment spending was $129.9 million bringing us to a total of $238.5 million year-to-date.
Our proceeds from dispositions were $236.9 million, bringing us to a total of $247 million year-to-date. Additionally, our company level rent coverage was at 1.77, well in line with the approximate 1.7 average we've seen over the past three consecutive years and highlighting the consistency of our operators businesses.
Now, I'll provide an update on our three specific segments. At quarter end, our entertainment portfolio included approximately $3 billion of total investments with one property under development, 169 properties in service and 23 operators.
Our occupancy was 99% and our rent coverage was 1.67 times. Investment spending in our entertainment segment totaled $23.8 million consisting primarily of build-to-suit development and redevelopment of megaplex theaters, entertainment retail centers and family entertainment centers.
Disposition proceeds in our entertainment segment totaled $13.6 million, which was primarily comprised of $9.4 million in proceeds from a partial prepayment of $8 million on principal on a mortgage note investment secured by the 360 Chicago Observation Deck at the John Hancock Tower in Chicago, Illinois.
Turning to industry updates. North American box office revenues were up over 8% versus prior year through this last weekend. The second quarter box office outperformance was impressive with almost 20% growth over the prior year and was driven by highly successful titles such as Avengers, Infinity War, Incredibles 2, Jurassic World and Deadpool 2.
While we are pleased with this summer's outstanding performance, it's not our expectation that this torrid pace will continue for the balance of the year and we continue to expect to end the year up closer to 2% to 4%.
At quarter end, our recreation portfolio included $2.1 billion of total investments with five properties under development, 80 properties in service and 21 operators. Our occupancy was 100% and our rent coverage was approximately 2.05 times.
Investment spending in our recreation segment totaled approximately $88.6 million during the second quarter, which included $27 million on the Kartrite Waterpark Hotel in the Catskills and $36.4 million on the on springs resort and spa, with the balance being primarily built-to-suit development of golf entertainment complexes and attractions.
The springs resort spa is a 79 room independent boutique resort - catering - featuring 23 natural hot spring tubs, terraced along the banks of the San Juan River in downtown Pagosa Springs, Colorado. Situated in the Colorado, Rocky Mountains the property is fed by a another spring that is the deepest thermal hot spring in the world. The springs have been attracting thousands of visitors for over 100 years and offer a unique and appealing recreational anchor to dislodging asset.
Our success with the Camelback Lodge in the Poconos Mountain of Pennsylvania, which includes skiing and waterpark recreational anchors has led us to pursue additional recreational base lodging assets such as the springs resort and spa.
We are also eager to welcome another water park anchored lodging asset to our portfolio in 2019 when the Kartrite opens in the New York Catskill Mountains, adjacent to the new Resorts World Casino.
As discussed on our last call, we received the pay down of approximately $221 million from affiliates of Och-Ziff Real Estate in conjunction with their sales of seven properties to Boeing resorts on May 7, 2018. This pay down reduce the carrying value of the note by approximately $175 million, resulting in the recognition of a $45.9 million prepayment fees and yielding an unlevered IRR on our investment of over 29% with an implied cap rate of 6.8%.
Additionally Vail Resorts announced in June that they have entered into agreements with OZRE to buy four of OZRE [ph] for six remaining ski properties. These transactions will require them to pay off the remaining $74.6 million carrying value of our note and we anticipate recognizing an additional $15 million of prepayment fees for total net proceeds of approximately $90 million, assuming the pay off occurs in the fourth quarter.
Turning to industry updates, the operators in our ski portfolio have delivered solid results this season with visits and revenue through April, up approximately 7% and 8% respectively versus the trailing 3 year average. To be clear, despite the outstanding performance of their underlying assets, we have removed the OZRE [ph] mortgage assets from our performance statistics due to the recent and expected loan payoffs.
Our attraction assets are in the heart of their productive season and we will provide a detailed update on the season during our next earnings call, which will allow us to report results for the vast majority of the summer season.
We are pleased to expand our relationship with Six Flags Entertainment Corporation with their May 22nd acquisition of the leasehold interest in five of the parks that were previously operated by Premier parks LLC. These parks were added to our portfolio in 2017 when we closed on our transaction with CNL Lifestyle Properties.
Six Flags had already purchased the operations of one other part from Premier, so we will now have a total of six assets leased to the world's largest regional theme park company. The transaction brings us both additional customer diversity and a deeper relationship with an active and well capitalized attractions operator. We look forward to growing this strategic relationship over the coming years as we further establish our position as the leading REIT owner of experiential real estate.
At quarter end, our education portfolio included over $1.4 billion of total investments with 6 properties under development, 146 properties in service and 58 operators. Our occupancy was 98% and our rent coverage was 1.47.
Investment spending in our education segment totaled $17.4 million, primarily consisting of build-to-suit development and redevelopment of public charter schools, early childhood education centers and private schools.
Subsequent to quarter end, we have sold five charter school properties for total net proceeds of approximately $55 million. Four of these five properties were leased to Imagine Schools and produced net proceeds of approximately $43.4 million. The transaction had a cash cap rate of approximately 9% and a GAAP cap rate of approximately 10% due to the additional non-cash direct financing income from these leases.
In July 2018, we entered into the agreement with CLA related to 21 open schools which replaces the prior leases with a one month lease expiring on August 31, 2018. We may agree to extend this lease in our sole discretion, if we believe CLA is making adequate progress towards a satisfactory restructuring. CLA made all of the $4.2 million schedule rent payments under the prior agreement covering the period of March to July 2018.
The new lease requires a rent payment of $1 million and we have only included one month of payments under this new lease in the midpoint of our earnings guidance. If the new lease is not extended, CLA will be required to expeditiously vacate the remaining properties in which case we intend to lease some or all of the 21 schools to other operators.
CLA also agreed to relinquish control of four of the company's properties that were still under development, as the company no longer intends to develop these properties for CLA. As Mark will detail in his comments, we took a charge during the quarter which essentially wrote off the cost of improvements specific to the development of CLA's prototype. We anticipate listing these properties in the near future.
CLA continues to negotiate with third parties regarding their restructuring that would permit CLA to continue operation of the properties. We are also actively pursuing other alternatives for these properties, including replacement tenants and operators.
Moving to our investment spending guidance. We are tightening our range to $450 million to $650 million from our previous range of towards [ph] of $700 million. We are also increasing our disposition guidance to $450 million to $500 million from the previous range of $350 million to $450 million. The increase is primarily due to our expectation that Oz [ph] will pay off their loan by the end of the year. Including the aforementioned July transactions, our year-to-date disposition proceeds are slightly in excess of $300 million.
With that, I will turn it over to Mark for a discussion of the financials and then rejoin you at the conclusion.
Thank you, Greg. I'd like to remind everyone on the call that our quarterly investor supplemental can be downloaded from our website.
Now turning to the first slide. Net income for the second quarter was $85.5 million or a $1.15 per share compared to $74.6 million or a $1.02 dollar or two per share in the prior year. FFO was $139 million compared to $85 million in the prior year.
Lastly, FFO as adjusted for the quarter increased to $141.8 million was $94.9 million in the prior year and was a $1.87 per share versus $1.29 per share in the prior year, an increase of 45%.
I would like to point out upfront that these results include the $45.9 million prepayment fee that Greg mentioned related to the $175.4 million partial prepayment on the OZRE mortgage note during the quarter.
Also before I walk through the key variances, I want to discuss two items from the quarter that were excluded from FFO as adjusted. Due to the recent agreement entertained [ph] into CLA, we determined that is unlikely that we will continue the development of four CLA early education properties.
Upon making this determination, we obtained appraisals of each of these properties and reduced the carrying value of the assets to $9.8 million by taking an impairment charge of $16.5 million. This charge is primarily related to the cost of improvements, specific to the development of the CLA prototype.
Additionally, during the quarter we settled our ongoing litigation with the Cappelli Group for $2 million. While we have always believed we have very strong defenses against the plaintiffs claims, the legal costs to continue the litigation through a trial would have in all likelihood exceeded the settlement costs. We are pleased to put this distraction behind us.
Now let me walk through the key line item variances for the quarter versus the prior year. Our total revenue increased 37% compared to the prior year to $202.9 million. Within the revenue category, rental revenue increased by $13.6 million versus the prior year to $137 million.
This increase resulted primarily from rental revenue related to new investments. Note that we recognized $2.5 million in revenue related to children's learning events during the quarter, as they made all of the required payments under the prior agreement we discussed on our last call. This represented a decrease of 240,000 versus the prior year.
Please also note that this quarter we began reporting tenant reimbursements within rental revenue due to the fact that the dollar amount is relatively small and also in preparation for the adoption of the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019 where these will be combined.
Tenant reimbursements were $3.8 million for the quarter versus $3.9 million in the prior year. Additionally, percentage rents for the quarter included in rental revenue were up slightly at $1.7 million versus prior year at $1.6 million.
Mortgage and other financing income was $65.2 million for the quarter, an increase of approximately $42.1 million versus the prior year. The increase resulted primarily from the $45.9 million and prepayment related to the OZRE repay down I discussed previously.
In addition, as Greg mentioned, during the quarter we received $9.4 million in proceeds from a partial repayment of a mortgage note investment we have in the observation deck of the John Hancock Tower in Chicago which included a $1.4 million prepayment fee.
These increases were partially offset primarily by Endeavor Schools exercise of the right to convert their $143 million mortgage note into a master lease arrangement during the first quarter of 2018.
On the expense side, our property operating expense increased by $1.3 million versus the prior year due to approximately 550,000 in real estate taxes paid on behalf of CLA, as well as higher operating expenses at our multi-tenant properties.
G&A expense increased to $13 million for the quarter compared to $10.7 million in the prior year, due primarily to increases in our payroll and benefit costs, as well as professional fees. There were no prepayment or termination fees related to our education properties in the second quarter versus $3.9 million in the prior year.
However, subsequent to quarter end, we did sell one public charter school pursuant to a tenant purchase option for total net proceeds of $11.9 million. And as a result we will recognize a termination fee of $1.9 million in FFO as adjusted for the third quarter.
Also subsequent to quarter end as Greg mentioned, we completed the sale of four Public Charter Schools leased to Imagine for net proceeds of $43.4 million and will recognize the gain on sale of $5.5 million in the third quarter that will be excluded from FFO and FFO as adjusted.
Tuning to next slide. For the six months ended June 30th, our total revenue was up 29% and our FFO as adjusted per share was up 26% to $3.12 including the Oz [ph] prepayment penalty. I want to also note, if we remove all prepayment and terminations fees from both year-to-date numbers, our FFO as adjusted per share growth was 5%.
Turning to next slide, I’ll review some of the company's key credit ratios. As you can see our coverage ratios continue to be strong and improving with fixed charge coverage at 3.2 times, debt service coverage at 3.7 times, interest coverage at 3.7 times and at quarter end our debt - net debt to adjusted EBITDA ratio was 5.6 times. Note that each of these ratios exclude all prepayment and termination fees. Our net debt to gross assets was slightly under 44% on a book basis and 37% on a market basis.
Now, let’s turn to the next slide for our capital markets and liquidity update. At quarter end we had total outstanding debt of $3 billion of which $2.9 billion is either fixed rate debt or debt that has been fixed through interest rate swaps with a blended coupon of approximately 4.6%.
We had 30 million drawn at quarter on our $1 billion line of credit and $3 million of unrestricted cash on hand. As previously we announced, .in April we issued $400 million of 10-year senior unsecured notes at a coupon of 4.95%, the proceeds of which were used to reduce our line of credit. We now have a weighted average debt maturity of over seven years and no debt maturities until 2022 which is a great position to be in given the potential of rising interest rates.
Subsequent to quarter end, we settled two expiring foreign currency agreements with the combined notional amount of $200 million and received a cash payment of $30.8 million in connection with the settlement. This significant gain will be recorded in - accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings upon the sale or liquidation of our properties in Canada.
These derivatives serve as a net investment hedge against the value of our Canadian properties and were replaced with two new cross currency swaps with a total notional value of $200 million Canadian through June of 2023.
Turning to next slide. We are pleased to announce that we are increasing our guidance for 2018 FFO as adjusted per share to a range of 597 to 607 from a range of 575 to 590. As Greg mentioned, we are narrowing our guidance for investment spending to a range of $450 million to $650 million from a range of $400 million to $700 million and increasing our disposition proceeds to a range of $450 million to $500 million from a range of $350 million to $450 million.
Note that our plan laid out at the beginning of the year to primarily use disposition proceeds to fund new investments has been working very well such that our guidance does not anticipate the need to raise any new capital over the remainder of the year. Guidance for 2008 18 as detailed on page 30 of our supplemental.
Turning to next slide, I thought it might be helpful to again provide a roadmap from the previous midpoint of FFO as adjusted per share guidance to the current midpoint. As you can see the increase in guidance is primarily due to a net increase in prepayment and terminations fees coupled with a slight increase in our base expectations.
Starting with the previous midpoint of 582, we had the net impact of additional prepayment and termination fees of $$0.19 cents per share, primary primarily related to the approximately $15 million we expect to receive on OZRE pays off its remaining loan balance with us as Greg discussed. We then added that penny per share related to additional percentage rents in the August CLA payment, partially offset by higher G&A expense. These changes move the midpoint of our guidance up by $0.20 to $6.02.
Please note as far as timing that the remaining OZRE prepayment fees of approximately $15 million are anticipated to occur in the fourth quarter, as our all the prepayment and termination fees associated with Public Charter School dispositions totaling approximately $13.5 million with the exception of the sale of one school which has already closed in the third quarter that had a termination of $1.9 million - termination fee of $1.9 million as I mentioned earlier.
Now with that, I'll turn it back over to Greg for his closing remarks.
Thank you, Mark. As we discussed this morning, we executed on multiple fronts this quarter, including our capital recycling plan, the further reduction of our Imagine locations and the overall performance of our portfolio.
Notwithstanding the strong results, we were disappointed that children's learning adventure did not complete their restructuring by the July 31 day. They have assured us their progress is being made. However, any restructuring requires the cooperation of many landlords and creditors.
To that end, we announced today a one month agreement to allow CLAs some additional time. However, it required they release the development parcels and any extension of such agreement will require demonstrated progress, as well as continued payment of our agreed upon rent.
Furthermore, we continue to work with other groups to allow optionality for EPR and I can assure you that we are working on a resolution. Furthermore, we are encouraged by the recovery of our share price and given the underlying performance of our operating partners, we believe their success will translate to attractive opportunities in the future to invest capital and grow our business.
Now, let's open it up for questions. Brian?
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Nick Joseph from Citi. Sir, your line is now open.
Thanks. I appreciate the color on the box office growth, can you review [ph] the struggles on MoviePass and meaningful risk to the theater industry. We've seen some estimates in MoviePass accounts for about 5% of all U.S. box office receipts?
Well, again, what I can rely upon is our discussions and the announcements from the theater operators, they haven't seen it yet and as we've discussed before Nick, almost all of the operators are now introducing their own kind of proprietary kind of plans, both Cinemark and AMC have announced plans. So to date, they’ve not kind of indicated that they're suffering as a result of that and the box office to date hasn't demonstrated it.
Thanks. Then just on CLA, what do you think the cost would be to release the CLA assets to new tenants if there is no resolution, as it sounds like there is specific improvements to the properties based off the impairment that you took?
Yeah, I think it's - you know we're - it's going to depend upon who the operator is. So we haven't - I mean I think one of the things that is important that you know when you look at these cost a lot of those get - you know whether they range from architectural and other type fees that that are very dependent upon that.
But one of the things I wanted to hit on Nick that we didn't discuss as part of this agreement is, we did get to gain the ability to share store level financials with potential new operators to demonstrate the performance of our stores.
So we think with this latest agreement, we've meaningfully improved our position to market those properties so that somebody can see that they can operate in their current environment.
And then maybe just finally you know, the CLA lease extended to August and for something in August that should result in a resolution or could this continue to be a month-to-month lease as long as the rent is current?
Well, again, it's a great point. What we've said is that we're not comfortable with extending that beyond a longer period. We want to continue to put pressure and see meaningful progress and at each one of these intervals, we get to determine if we think that progress is sufficiently being made that either encourages us to continue or allows us to stop the process at that time.
Thanks.
Thank you, Nick.
And our next question comes from the line of Craig Mailman from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Sir, your line is now open.
Good morning, guys.
Good morning, Craig.
Just to follow up on your commentary about your improved cost of capital and kind of the optimism that gives you on the investment spending front. I guess could you just maybe give us a sense of - you know, your ability now to kind of trend towards the high end. I know previously said you kind of have to trend toward the high end of dispositions is that not the case anymore and we could see you guys surpass the midpoint. Or are you going to kind of still take a more cautious kind of view here?
I think it's a little of both, Craig. I think again, we've just kind of regained our footing on this price. So it takes a little while to ramp up. You know, turning the spigot [ph] on more investments.
But I will tell you that the posture of which we're approaching investments has changed and we think that we can issue equity if we find the right opportunities to grow our business. The underlying businesses are doing well. So we think that's conducive of creating opportunities.
But we are - you know this - our prices kind of just recently recovered in the last 60 days. So we are - you can you can feel it in this company and with our people that the opportunity is a bit more offensive posture is starting to blossom.
That's helpful. As we just look at guidance surrounding this, I mean, were there any meaningful changes to kind of what your spread expectations were?
Not now, but we think you know, clearly it's potentially going forward if we deploy additional capital. But there wasn't, I mean our dispositions are coming in, in line with our expectations.
Yeah. Remember, we're not raising capital to do our investments, where [dispositions are funding our investments, so that really hasn't changed spreads.
That's helpful. And then just on CLA, you guys have the extra month cushing [ph] now on timing perspective. What's the pipeline of prospective tenants if CLA - if you guys were to not renew at the end of August for another month. Kind of how much of that can be backfilled by year end or you know any time on you guys see and how much of it is kind of maybe less demand at this point?
Yeah, I mean, like I said, I think and we've had these discussions. It really depends upon if someone is wanting to take over an existing position and maintain the existing enrollment or they want to rebrand it and start a new.
So we've got multiple discussions you know, somewhere between 4 and 8 discussions going on with multiple operators. So there are a variety of options. It's just finding the best solution that we feel is the least disruptive, both in terms of cash flows and for the affected families.
Okay. And then just on the development, I am sorry if I missed this, are you guided the two [ph] network in process that you kind of halted. Are you guys looking for backfill tenants there or are you just looking to kind of sell the dream to another developer?
We're going to check all of those. I mean, we just got those back, as you can see in the last couple of weeks. So we're willing to you know explore all of those - all of those alternatives, whether that's a sale working with a different operator, as far as to develop something, its just that this agreement has come together more recently and we're going to explore all of those options, Craig.
And do you feel like there's a good opportunity to kind of recoup some of the write down that you guys took this quarter?
Again, it's an opportunity but right now it's so early without knowing what others would exactly want to do with it. We felt this was more an opportunity for us to utilize these to increase the pressure on CLA to understand that we were very serious about our position and make them - making progress.
We will - we've had a history of putting our properties into productive use. So we'll start looking at that and whether that's with an early ad [ph] operator, whether that's with a - if these are good sites they could be entertainment or - we're going to exhaust all opportunities to get the best recovery that we can.
And then just last one, what kind of specialized kind of design or improvements are they putting in to carry that kind of cost. It seems kind of high for a early ed facility?
Again, like I said you're going across four properties there. There is various things from playground equipment, you know different things that carry the gamut of their design in terms of you know even from the geotech and how you the pad and can someone use that exact pad. So there's just a lot across four properties.
Great. Thanks, guys.
Our next question comes from the line of Collin Mings from Raymond James. Your line is now open.
Hey. Good morning, guys.
Good morning, Collin.
Just on the investment front, can you just expand on prepared remarks regarding the Colorado acquisition at June and how that came about. And then just more broadly touch on how you see the pipeline of acquisitions versus development opportunities, as you look to ramp back up some investment spending?’
Sure. I think Collin, given our presence in what I would call the recreational hospitality with what we've done at Camelback and what we announced with the Kartrite we've been approached by people who see that that recreational hospitality as an opportunity and we were - we've been looking at this deal probably for four to six months trying to understand the recreational element and the durability of the underlying recreational activity and how that's supportive with the lodging.
That deal came together, you know, we feel that we're well positioned in that. We've got the substantial quality partner in the property. It is a triple net lease, so it's more in our fashion than in hospitality. So it worked for us, with structure it's got a longstanding history of operating excellence. So we feel it fits naturally within our recreational portfolio.
As far as again, it's one of those things that acquisitions would be meaningful to the year's performance. But a lot of our business this year has been kind of build-to-suit and we continue to look at those opportunities. Those are the kind of the ones that we kind of slowed down with our capital, so those will be the ones that we kind of turned back to immediately.
But we will always continue to look for quality acquisition opportunities within that we could add to our portfolio. We just haven't been kind of beating that drum as much. I think you'll start to see a slow rumble with that drum, hopefully by the end of the year will be pounding it pretty hard.
Okay. That's helpful. And then just turning to the theater redevelopment projects, just maybe can you touch on how rising construction costs are impacting your underwriting and just maybe how that impacts the threshold for conversion, especially some of the more productive theaters that I know, in the past that you kind of indicated may not make sense to convert. But just how does rising construction cost kind of fit into all that?
That you're [indiscernible] in the sense that it becomes an analysis - becomes a kind of return on invested capital. So it's really in conjunction with our operators we sit down and kind of look at and it also goes to a point that we've discussed Collin, whether you are first mover or second mover or third or fourth in the market and we have a detailed analysis on what we think each one of those positions contributes and the ROIC with respect to that.
But there is - no doubt that rising construction costs and candidly the availability of labor is impacting the ability to deliver on those. To date, it seems to still be very much working and our operators are still moving [Technical Difficulty] and enjoying the benefits of the monetization.
But it has kind of - it has kind of dampened, especially as you get to those kind of fourth mover in a market with the increased cost, the ROIC’s are getting more instead of what we're you know 30 to mid 20s they're into closer [Technical Difficulty] to the mid teens which starts to have a different discussion profile with the operator.
On the really, really high productive theaters, it still is an issue of relative productivity. It's not - it hasn't to date been an issue of cost. It's the productivity issue and can you recoup the overall kind of attendance metric in that format.
Great. Appreciate the color. I'll turn it over.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from the line Ki Bin Kim from SunTrust.
Hi. Good morning, guys.
Hey, Ki Bin.
So I don't want to believe [ph] at the point too much, but honestly LA [ph] you guys took an impairment charge on of $16.5 million? [Technical Difficulty] and wrote it down to about 9.8. I mean, just percentage wise that's a pretty big impairment charge. So does that make you think twice about making a buildout very specialized to us [indiscernible] or is that just basically the name of the game you have to do it.
And what does that imply about the existing properties the 21 assets and what the recovery rate could be on those assets?
Again, I think Ki Bin, it has more to do with - remember we stopped construction of this - of these projects in January of 2017. So as we sit now it's less so much about the specialization of some of these and more about you know what are the cost [Technical Difficulty] those.
They've got tied up in this in this process. But like I said, I don't think it's an issue of you know, here are specific things that are very, very unique to them as much as that there is product that's been exposed to the elements for 18 months, when you start to look at kind of what the recovery of that and the usability [Technical Difficulty] it starts to get impact and candidly we wanted to take a very conservative approach to this.
Yeah, if it becomes more likely than not, you're not going to finish development as Greg said, you're basically writing him down the land value and then you have optionality whether you want to have someone else could come in and continue development or he could sell those properties as land.
Yeah. That makes sense. Good point. And can you remind us what is the carrying value of the 21 assets that you have with CLA? And what you..
Sorry, you finish.
And I know there's a wide range of outcomes that are possible, but if you had to you know, I guess, what’s the base case recovery ratio for the 21 assets you think at this point?
I would say that number as we've talked about is about $250 million. And what we said was the original writ [ph] was around $20 million and we thought a base case was [Technical Difficulty] somewhere in the 60% to 70% of that number.
Okay, thanks. And just last question. The customer rent coverage data you show in the slide deck, I think if I look at the footnotes is a little - it's a little bit older with I think the trailing 12 months from 2017. Do you have any updated status on the rent coverage for the three verticals?
It's really - it becomes - it's really gets a little bit crazy because of schools. I think, if you if you look on for most of ours and some of the seasonal stuff, if you look at our entertainment that's like one quarter behind. So you're like seeing a trailing 12 with one quarter behind.
But the seasonal if we - it would be distorted if you're right in the middle of the season and you don't have - yet you know it would distort it from its productivity. So we try that - kind of annualize that to reflect the seasonality of it.
Okay. Thanks.
Thank you. [Technical Difficulty]
when you previously expected them or has that slowed down?
No I mean, I think they're still tracking in the fashion that we had anticipated. So nothing's changed from our underlying thesis.
Okay. In the press release you had said that if agreement doesn't get worked out by the end of August that CLA would vacate those properties. Now if that does occur, do you expect an orderly transition or would you have to go to the courts to get those assets back?
Well, again that's something we would hope for an orderly process. We can't predict even if you have - if you have a contractual right you may have to go enforce that. So I mean, hopefully it would be in an orderly fashion. That's the way the reason we drafted the agreement that way.
Okay. And then just last question on acquisitions and I know you said that you're getting a little bit more comfortable deploying capital. How long is there a delay versus the improvement in your cost of capital versus when you can actually start completing more investments? I mean have you remained on track to complete those types of deals and it's just like flipping a switch or does it take a little bit longer to do that?
Well, I am going to build the suit [ph] side if you can imagine it takes a little bit longer because of the fact we've talked about that, you know, theaters and entertainment they want to open and specific and if we've kind of delayed certain projects they may not readily line back up.
Acquisitions is a little more opportunistic and we just need to get our self reinserted in some of those discussions. And as I said, we're beginning to feel more positive about that and we'll see kind of where that takes us.
Okay, great. Thank you
Thank you
And our next question comes from the line of David Hargreaves from Stifel. Your line is now open.
Hi, thank you. With respect to the development in the Catskills I was curious if you had any thoughts on the early performance of the casino that's opened and how dependent your project is on the success of the casino? And what the level of commitment you're seeing from your partners there in the Catskills.
Again, sorry, David, again we just had the official kind of grand opening there in May. I think the numbers have trended up positively. However, we do think it's - the Cartwright [ph] is a different product, it's a much more family oriented kind of product in which it's target market is slightly different. We would think those as kind of complimentary, but not necessarily competing.
And so, while we're always happy for the project, the casino to do well to create awareness and to create a kind of an opportunity to showcase the overall region, it's not something that the Waterpark operator is dependent upon. And in fact, they are going to start their own independent marketing campaign for that property, separate and apart from the casino.
That's due to open by April?
Yeah, March, April timeframe, yes.
And there's been - you guys haven't scaled back the development size at all, right, for the most part...
No.
Pretty much as...
No, we didn’t...
Oh, great.
Yeah. No that's still as we previously discussed.
So at this past [ph] week, very impressive. Thank you.
Thank you. Thank you. It's a beautiful project. We think it will be well-received by the Greater New York area. It is a beautiful, if anyone gets the opportunity it truly is an outstanding and Camelback operators actually have proven their ability to deliver a quality customer experience.
Thanks very much.
And our next question comes from the line of John Massocca from Ladenburg Thalmann. Your line is now open.
So going back to guidance quickly, what is flowing through that $0.19 adjustment in guidance from the prepayments? Is there anything kind of offsetting the you know, kind of top line $17 million in additional prepayment fees from entertainment or is that offset by the 500,000 less in lease term fees you are expecting?
So what we've got there, if you look at that reconciliation you've got additional prepayment penalties from [indiscernible] So you got - we had set [ph] $45 million, it turned out to be $45.9, its got an extra 900,000 there.
There's $15 million we expect from the Vail purchase that they'll pay us, so that totals $15.9 million. Then you've got the John Hancock payments. So those - that adds up to $17.3 million. And if you divide that by the number of shares, that's where the $0.23 comes from.
We offset that by lower termination fees that are going down by about 500,000 at the midpoint. And then of course, there's the impact of incremental dilution from the convertibles and that's how you get to a $0.19.
So what's the negative impact from the convertible are those either $0.02 or $0.01, I can’t remember?
It's $0.01 for the incremental amount that we're changing guidance by, and as income goes up once you're in the dilution as your income goes up you have an impact from the convertibles and so it's additional penny.
So from the $0.23 of the positive, you losing a penny from the convertible is probably what half a penny from a penny from the...
Education.
Education and what's kind of the rest…
Oh sorry, and then the $0.02 is the loss [ph] income from the fact that we hadn't [ph] anticipated that $75 million additional paydown.
Okay. That make sense. And then it was fairly small, but what was the early education center you sold in the quarter that went along [ph] for Connecticut [ph]
It was $1.4 million, it was Caeli Wallingford [ph].
Yeah. Again, it was just a project that we felt like when we - the operator wanted to get out and we made a decision that we didn't want to be involved without them, so we sold the property as well.
Okay. That was a CLA development that you sold?
No, no, [indiscernible]
Kind of the [indiscernible]
[indiscernible] that reaction, but no it was not.
No, no, I understand. And then I know it's midseason, have you any update on how kind of the Schlitterbahn [ph] properties are performing, specifically the Texas ones. I would assume Kansas is probably struggling a little bit given the closed rides [ph] but are you still confident that the Texas Parks [ph] can cover the mortgage payments?
Again, I think nothing's changed on our belief. Hopefully, that very hot weather that Texas is experiencing is helping us. In that sense, but you are correct, there's no doubt that Kansas is struggling, but it never was a major contributor. And so our thesis of Texas supporting that remains intact.
Okay. That’s it from me. Thank you very much.
Thanks.
[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from the line of Nick Joseph from Citi. Your line is now open.
Hey. It's Michael Billman here with Nick. Greg, just in terms of expanding your subsegment, you know, you have these slides in [indiscernible] which sort of lifted out a variety of different expansion possibilities across entertainment and recreation. It's funny [ph] because the natural hot springs and spa [ph] was of one of the options. So I assume there's a lot of…
I do think recreational lodging was part of it. You go, right.
Yeah, I didn't know - they didn't say spa. So there is a lot of other things on here, spa was one of them. But I guess now you talked about this whole you know, feeling more comfortable with where your stock is at from a cost of capital perspective.
How do you think about deploying capital either to existing segments you have versus using that capital to embark on further you know, new subsegments. And if you were to look at those pages you know, what sort of ranks really high in the list of what you'd like versus stuff that's low on your list?
I would say Michael that, if we if we get more offensive for the balance of the year, it's probably going to be in existing segments and existing products. Again, I think that's where we'll - that will be easiest for us to turn the spigot [ph] back on. And so my guess is you won't see a lot of introduction of any sort of new subsegments for the balance of the year.
We would have - we'll have probably an opportunity to have a more meaningful shareholder discussion about those opportunities as the year develops and we go into next year. So for the remaining part of the year I would look for more of our traditional product.
Okay. Thank you.
Thank you.
And I'm currently showing no further questions. I would now like to turn back to Craig Silvers, President and CEO for any closing remarks.
Well, I just want to thank everyone for joining us this morning. Hopefully, everybody has enjoyed the change for us to start this early as opposed the end of the day and we look forward to continue next quarter. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Bye-bye.
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participation in today's conference. This concludes today’s program. And you may all disconnect. Everyone have a great day.++++++