Compass Diversified Holdings
NYSE:CODI
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
20.04
24.56
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Compass Diversified Holdings
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Good afternoon and welcome to the Compass Diversified's Second Quarter 2021 Conference Call. Today's call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions].
At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Matt Berkowitz of The IGB Group for introductions and the reading of the Safe Harbor statement. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you and welcome to Compass Diversified's second quarter 2021 conference call. Representing the company today are Elias Sabo, CODI's CEO; Ryan Faulkingham, CODI's CFO; and Pat Maciariello, COO of Compass Group Management.
Before we begin, I would like to point out that the Q2, 2021 press release including the financial tables and non-GAAP financial measure reconciliations are available at the Investor Relations section on the company's website at www.compassdiversified.com.
The Company also filed its Form 10-Q with the SEC today after the market close, which includes reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures discussed on this call and is available at the Investor Relations section of our website. Please note that references to EBITDA and the following discussions referred to adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income in the company's financial filings. The company does not provide a reconciliation of its full year expected 2021 adjusted EBITDA or 2021 payout ratio, because certain significant reconciling information is not available without unreasonable efforts. Throughout this call, we will refer to Compass Diversified as CODI or the Company.
Now allow me to read the following Safe Harbor statement. During this conference call, we may make certain forward-looking statements, including statements with regard to the future performance of CODI and its subsidiaries. And statements related to expected divestitures of Liberty and CODI's future tax structure. Words such as believes, expects, plans, projects and future or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in predicting future results and conditions.
Certain factors could cause actual results to differ on a material basis from those projected in these forward-looking statements. And some of these factors are enumerated in the Risk Factor discussion in the Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC for the quarter ended June 30, 2021, as well as in other SEC filings.
In particular, the domestic and global economic environment, as currently impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic has a significant impact on our subsidiary company. Except as required by law, CODI undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Elias Sabo.
Good afternoon. Thank you all for your time, and welcome to our second quarter earnings conference call. Before we get started, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank all of our employees for their extraordinary efforts, which continue to impress me as we navigate further through this unprecedented time.
We've exited 2020 with strong momentum, and that has carried over in 2021. Before we turn to the financial performance for the quarter, we want to provide an update on our busy start to 2021 and the significant progress we have made against our strategic alternatives.
During the second quarter, we took significant steps towards our potential tax reclassification. We have set a date for our special shareholders meeting which will be held on August 3, and we will announce the results of our special proxy vote as soon as practicable, following that meeting. If we receive approval from our shareholders, we expect our Board will seek to effect the tax reclassification, as soon as practicable.
We are excited about this potential change, which we believe would present an opportunity to expand CODI's shareholder base and make our company more widely accessible. We believe this would position us to further build on our 15 plus years of success as a public company and provide greater value for all shareholders over time.
Subsequent to the second quarter, we announced the execution of a definitive agreement to divest Liberty Safe, which we expect to close in August of 2021. I want to extend a special thanks to the management team and employees of Liberty Safe for 11 years of successful partnership with us.
During this time, we established both strong personal and professional relationship while delivering a solid return on invested capital that exceeded our initial underwriting expectations. I wish the Liberty team success with their new partners as they embark upon the next stage of their journey.
Earlier this year, we also completed a debt refinancing that significantly lowered our interest costs, further reduced our weighted average cost of capital and strengthened our capital structure. This is a key example of how our team is always looking for more efficient ways to tap into the capital markets. As a result of our actions in March, we believe today we are better positioned to continue to leverage our permanent capital structure to our advantage as we look to be opportunistic in the market.
And finally, before I turn to financial performance, I want to mention that we have initiated a process to preliminarily explore strategic alternatives for 5.11, including a potential initial public offering. We trust you will understand that in light of this, we will not be able to take any questions on 5.11 today.
Now turning to our financial performance. I'm pleased to report that our second quarter results continued the trend of outperformance that we saw on the first quarter, including BOA and Marucci as if we own them from January 1 2020, pro forma consolidated revenue grew approximately 36% and adjusted EBITDA grew approximately 63% over prior year's quarter.
Our second quarter results were exceptional and reflect the incredible work of each of our subsidiary companies management teams. Though we continue to experience certain challenges and uncertainties stemming from the pandemic, such as changes in demand patterns, supply disruption, shortages in labor, and inflationary pressures at that levels not previously experienced. Our subsidiaries teams continue to expertly manage their operations to deliver record results.
Our branded consumer businesses continued to grow at an accelerated rate. With all six of our branded consumer businesses growing revenue and EBITDA at a double digit rate, producing second quarter aggregate EBITDA growth of approximately 100% over the prior year. This growth was significantly above our expectations. However, it is important to point out that our second quarter growth rate is distorted due to the base effect from last year when the economy went into shutdown.
Our consumer businesses started posting accelerated growth in third quarter of 2020, which is carried through this quarter. As a result, we expect the growth rate of our consumer businesses to normalize going forward as we have higher prior year comparables. Following on the trends experienced in the first quarter, our industrial businesses posted second quarter revenue and EBITDA growth of 24% and 18% respectively. These results, which also exceeded our expectations, reflected quicker return of demand for Sterno and Arnold, our businesses most impacted by the pandemic.
Notwithstanding the outperformance in the first half, I want to emphasize that the macro environment remains uncertain. While demand across our subsidiaries remained strong, significant challenges exist, particularly on the supply side, inflationary pressures remain elevated, and supply constraints are a key.
We were very pleased that our margins in the second quarter held up remarkably well, despite these pressures, and believe this is a testament to the strength of our subsidiary management team. Going forward, we expect some margin headwinds in the third quarter, as higher input costs start to flow out of inventory and into our cost of goods sold. These extraordinary conditions are creating a backdrop where our subsidiaries like many others are raising prices in order to combat rising inflationary pressures.
Emerging from the pandemic has created a fluid environment that makes forecasting future results more difficult than in past periods. Amongst the difficulties are uncertainty over demand pattern changes, supply shortages, labor tightness and inflationary pressures. That said, in light of our extraordinary first half results and our expectations for the balance of the year, we now expect to produce full year 2021 consolidated subsidiary adjusted EBITDA of between $350 million and $370 million, which includes Liberty, representing growth of 20% to 27% from prior year, and a payout ratio of between 65% and 55% based on her historic distribution rate of $0.36 per share each quarter.
If we exclude Liberty's adjusted EBITDA from our 2021 full year estimate, as the sale is anticipated to close in August, we would expect to produce between $325 million and $345 million of consolidated subsidiaries adjusted EBITDA.
I would also like to note that our guidance incorporates one-time expenses and write off at Sterno of up to $5 million in the back half of 2021 as the company exits a low margin product line.
As a reminder, we do not add back extraordinary costs in our result. Excluding this charge and with the economic recovery underway, we believe the company will continue to show positive comparisons in the back half of the year.
Before turning the call over to Pat to review our subsidiary results, I would like to take a minute to discuss our ongoing ESG efforts. CODI is deeply committed to maintaining responsible investment practices that position our businesses and our firm for long-term success and positively impact the world around you.
I am proud to report that during the second quarter, we became a sponsoring member of US SIF, the forum for sustainable and responsible investing. US SIF is the leading voice in advancing sustainable and impact investing across all asset classes. We believe joining the US SIF strengthens our commitment, and we look forward to being an active participant in the forum.
Also during the second quarter of 2021, we added two independent Board members to BOA's Board of Directors. While last year we added two independent Board members to Marucci Board, solidifying our commitment to good corporate governance, both at the CODI and the subsidiary level.
With that, I will now turn the call over to Pat.
Thank Elias. Before I begin in our subsidiary results, I want to talk generally about the quarter.
We believe our branded consumer businesses remain very well positioned to benefit from the changing consumer landscape. Each of these businesses exceeded our expectations in the quarter. As a group, our niche industrial businesses also performed above expectations. That said, I also want to reinforce what Elias said about today's dynamic environment. All 10 of our subsidiaries experienced significant increases in costs in the quarter, and many of them face supply chain disruptions. Our management teams showed tremendous skill and adjusting on a real time basis to the fluid conditions and they once again affirmed the strong competence we have in them.
Now, on to our subsidiary results, I'll begin with our niche industrial businesses. For the second quarter of 2021, revenue increased by 24.1% and EBITDA increased by 18.4% versus the second quarter of 2020.
On a year-to-date basis, revenues increased by 13.6% and EBITDA increased by 10% versus 2020. For the year-to-date period, revenue at Advanced Circuits was approximately flat, and EBITDA declined by 3.4% as compared to the first six months of 2020. Once again in this quarter, bookings outpaced billings, and ACI has built up considerable backlog due to parse shortages, mostly in its assembly business,
Arnold Magnetics, revenue increased by 20.8% and EBITDA increase by 47.2% to $9.8 million in the first six months of the year. The increase was driven by several factors including increased sales to aerospace and defense related customers associated with large orders received in 2020, higher gross profit margins associated with positive mix, and the acquisition of Ramco, which was completed on March 1 of this year.
Arnold met our expectations for the quarter, despite order volume in the company's aerospace segment not yet returned to pre pandemic levels. As this market segment normalizes in the remainder of 2021, we expect that Arnold's performance will material outpace a weaker back half of 2020.
Outdoor Solutions grew revenue by 48.6% and EBITDA grew by 12% in the year-to-date June 2021 period, as compared to the same period of 2020. As we forecasted last quarter, margins were under pressure in the second quarter, due to two significant increases in the company's core raw material. In addition, margins continue to be impacted by the acquisition of Polyfoam in Q3 2020, which carries lower margins.
We expect margins to improve for Outdoor for the remainder of the year, as the company is able to contractually pass through a substantial portion of its raw material price increases. We also expect performance improvement measures at Polyfoam to progress following pandemic related delays.
The Sterno Group's year-to-date revenue and EBITDA increased by 3.9% and 5.8% respectively, versus year-to-date 2020. Demand for the company's core chasing fuel lines continue to increase sequentially as travel and events slowly return to normal. They're improving significantly. The company is not yet seeing food service demand at pre pandemic levels. Demand for Sterno's consumer products remains solid, and the company continues to see strong demand for its line of wax and essential oil products.
As Elias mentioned, in Q3 and Q4, we will have restructuring expenses totaling $4 million to $5 million at Sterno, as the company exits a lower margin product line. Excluding these expenses, we believe Sterno will continue to show positive comparisons in the back half of the year, absent new pandemic related mandates being put in place.
Now turning to our branded consumer businesses, which as the group experienced another exceptional quarter. Our results are presented as that we owned Marucci and BOA from January 1 2020. For the quarter, each of our six branded consumer businesses exceeded our expectations and experienced significant growth. As a group, year-to-date revenues increased by 38.7% and EBITDA increased by 19.3%, versus the year-to-date period in 2020.
BOA's year-to-date revenue increased by 57.8% versus the comparable period in 2020, EBITDA more than doubled to $32.2 million versus the capital period in 2020, exceeding our expectations. BOA continues to experience strong demand across most of its categories led by cycling, workwear and snowboard customers. In addition, the company's partners in trail running launched several new innovative products during the quarter which were met with an excitement in the market.
We continue to believe that some portion of BOA's exceptional growth stems from brand partners ordering ahead due to supply chain constraints associated with slowdowns in global shipping. We believe the company will perform well and continue to grow in the back of 2021, but we do not expect the same level of explosive growth that we have experienced year-to-date.
BOA's growth so far under our ownership has been exceptional. While the company is not immune from supply chain challenges and delays, particularly given their growth, management is definitely working through these issues. We are working well with a team of BOA at all levels, and are pleased to have developed a strong trust and solid relationships. We're excited about the company's future and are proud to be partners with the team there.
ERGO Baby's year-to-date 2021 EBITDA increased to $11.1 million versus $8.9 million in the year-to-date period of 2020, an increase of 24.1%. The company has experienced strong demand for its Omni Breeze carrier, which we started shipping in the first quarter of this year, as well as strong sales generally online.
We feel like the company has achieved an inflection point in performance and remain optimistic about ERGO Baby's prospects in the back half of 2021. That said, ERGO Baby is one of our most global businesses, and as such continued lock downs in a number of countries could impact its growth in the remainder of the year.
Liberty Safe's year-to-date revenue and EBITDA increased by 31.4% and 66.5% respectively, compared with the prior year-to-date period. As Elias mentioned, we have entered into a definitive agreement to divest Liberty Safe, which we expect to close in August. And I would just like to take this moment to personally thank the employees and management team of the company for over a decade of partnership.
Marucci had another strong quarter that exceeded expectations. It is important to note however, that comparisons benefited from a severely impacted second quarter in 2020 when team sports were almost completely halted due to the pandemic. Revenue in the year-to-date period grew by 120% and EBITDA increased dramatically to $17.7 million versus $3.2 million in the prior year-to-date period.
Marucci did have certain operational inefficiencies this quarter, and we expect margins to improve from second quarter levels in the back half of the year. The third quarter represents a tough comparable for the company as Q3 2020 represented an opening up of team sports, and the company launched the highly successful CAT9 line of bats. That being said, we believe the company and its brand are on solid footing and will have a strong back half 2021.
Of note, I would like to mention that this last weekend represented the return of the Marucci World Series, in which 120 Premier youth baseball teams traveled to Louisiana to compete on playing fields throughout the state. We are excited that this events return following the pandemic. By all accounts it was a tremendous occasion that signaled a strong return for youth baseball following a canceled season.
Velocity Outdoors EBITDA increased significantly in the first half of 2021, up 136.7% to $24.8million. Velocity's performance surpassed our elevated expectations as consumer interest and outdoor activities continue to be strong and drove demand for their products.
Bookings in the quarter were higher than they were in the second quarter of 2020. Despite the company having a very strong quarter a year ago and backlog remained to close to record levels. But we are not certain to what degree the permanently shifted consumer behavior towards Outdoor activities. We do believe that Velocity captured significant market share in both of its main segments over last 18 months. So challenges continue in part of the company's supply chain and they are not immune to commodity price increases, we believe the Velocity will have a solid back half 2021.
Finally, 5.11 year-to-date EBITDA increased by 41.7% versus year-to-date 2020, and revenue grew by 14.4% over the same period. As a reminder, due to the process we have initiated at 5.11, I won't be delving further into the specifics of 5.11 performances.
I will now turn the call over to Ryan for his comments and our financial results.
Thank you, Pat. Moving to our consolidated financial results for the quarter ended June 30 2021, I will limit my comments largely to the overall results for CODI since the individual subsidiary results are detailed in our Form 10-Q that was filed with the SEC earlier today.
On a consolidated basis, revenue for the quarter ended June 30 2021 was $487.4 million, up 46.1% compared to $333.6 million for the prior year period. This year-over-year increase primarily reflects our acquisition of BOA during 2020. In addition, we had strong sales growth at our branded consumer subsidiaries and our niche industrial businesses on a combined basis.
Consolidated net loss for the quarter ended June 30 2021 was $11.3 million compared to $7.4 million in the prior year. The increase in net loss was due to a $33.3 million loss on debt extinguishment recorded during the second quarter of 2021. As a result of our bond refinancing.
Cash flow available for distribution and reinvestment or CAD for the quarter ended June 30 2021 was $46.6 million, almost three and a half times the prior year period of $13.5 million. Our CAD that we generated during the quarter was significantly above our expectations almost doubled our distribution, and was the highest quarterly CAD we've ever generated. The increase was primarily due to the outstanding performance at our most recent acquisitions, Marucci and BOA as well as continued strong performance at virtually all of our consumer industrial businesses.
Other factors impacting our CAD in the second quarter compared to the prior year include slightly higher CapEx spend an increase in cash taxes, higher management fees as a result of our waiver in the second quarter of last year, and higher interest expense.
Turning to our balance sheet. As of June 30 2021, we had over $100 million in cash, approximately $600 million available on a revolver, and our leverage was approximately 2.6 times. We have substantial liquidity and as previously communicated, we have the ability to upsize our revolver capacity by an additional $250 million. We stand ready and able to provide our subsidiaries with the financial support they need, invest in subsidiary growth opportunities and act on compelling investment opportunities as they present themselves.
Turning now of capital expenditures. During the second quarter of 2021, we incurred $6.1 million of maintenance CapEx of our existing businesses, compared to $3.3 million in the prior year period. The increase was primarily results of the need for increased maintenance spend at many of our subsidiaries, to keep up with elevated demand levels.
During the second quarter of 2021, we continue to invest in growth capital, spending $4.1 million in the quarter primarily related to 5.11 long-term growth objectives. Growth CapEx in the prior year quarter was $3.1 million.
Turning now to an update on our tax reclassification process. As we've mentioned on prior calls and Elias referenced earlier, we are pursuing a potential change in our tax classification. On June 23 2021, we issued a definitive proxy statement requesting shareholder approval to amend our governing documents, to allow the trust to check the box, to elect to be treated as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
The shareholder meeting will be held on August 3 2021. If the amendments are approved, we anticipate that our Board of directors will call the trust to elect to be treated as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, effective late in the third quarter of 2021 or early in the fourth quarter of 2021.
We will provide an update on the results of the shareholder meeting as soon as reasonably practicable, following the conclusion of the August 3 meeting. Please refer to the definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on June 23 2021 for additional information related to the potential tax reclassification.
With that, I will now turn the call back over to Elias
Thank you, Ryan. I would like to close by briefly discussing M&A activity and our go forward growth strategy. In 2020, we took advantage of market conditions and acquired two outstanding platform companies with exceptional growth prospects. And early in 2021, we consummated an add on for our Arnold subsidiary.
As we stand today, market conditions have changed rapidly. Asset prices have appreciated materially driven by an increase in M&A activity stemming from an abundance of equity capital, coupled with strong availability of that capital. Despite the frothy market, CODI remains well positioned to succeed. Our permanent capital structure allows us to be flexible and take advantage of market conditions.
In addition, the dramatic reduction in our cost of capital over the past few years, allows us to be selectively aggressive on acquisition opportunities that we deem have potential to enhance shareholder returns.
Going forward, we will continue to invest in and enhance our subsidiary company's competitive positioning, which includes supporting them as they build and grow their digital transformation strategies. Our differentiated strategy has set us apart for more than a decade, and it remains consistent. In 2021, we will continue to be intensely focused on executing our proven and disciplined acquisition strategy, improving the operating performance of our companies and enhancing our commitment to ESG initiatives across our portfolio and creating long-term shareholder value.
With that, operator please open the lines for Q&A.
[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from Larry Solow of CGS Securities. Your line is open, please go ahead.
Great. Good afternoon guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Elias, perhaps just a general question kind of a lead in you kind of getting a lead in on your closing comments there. Just in terms of the pending reclassification the tax reclassification and what do you see as sort of the advantages or to that switch beyond sort of the obvious that does create the target investor base and lowering the cost of capital, so does that perhaps make you more aggressive in future growth strategy, maybe try to make your site even bigger with access to lower cost of capital. Then you can just discuss that from a high level any potential changes there, any potential changes on the capital structure, and even thought to that will be great?
Sure, and thanks, Larry, for the question, and I talked to you this afternoon. So when we embarked on this process, and started reviewing the entire tax reclassification, obviously, the first thing that we had to, the look through was holistically as there going to be a bigger tax burden as a result of this or not. Fortunately, based on some tax law changes in 2017, we found that the tax burden was the same holistically, whether we were a C-Corp taxpayer, or a pass through.
So the principal benefit of being able to do this, as you've identified it, it really opens up the aperture of the number of investors that can access our company, ETFs are largely unable to given the path through characteristic the K1 of those unrelated business, taxable income that we create, there's a lot of retirement accounts, and frankly more and more institutional potential owners are choosing not to invest in pass through type entity. So, without having a negative from a tax standpoint, but getting the benefit of having additional shareholders, as we've talked to investors about this during the proxy, sort of a no brainer, it's all benefit without kind of any cost associated with it.
I think there's some, you know, secondary and tertiary benefits, Larry, that, where you're at right now. I think we would like to move eventually towards a concept of an adjusted EPS in a way from probably CAD, there'll be an overlap period, so that we get compatibility, because we want this to be completely transparent, but I think that helps with a few things, owning public companies like we did with five years ago, as you remember, one of the challenges with CAD is because we were getting the cash flow from a public company, it really put a lot of pressure on us to sell that asset and redeploy it into something that got a cash flow, going forward as we migrate to a more adjusted EPS, which is, I think, also more easily understood and digested by the investor or community.
So, hopefully that same - that to your question about kind of our growth initiatives, we've been very transparent and saying, we think this company operates better as a bigger entity, we think that in the next kind of seven to 10 years, this should be a billion dollar EBITDA company, and being able to get there, we were not going to get there only through organic growth, and through use of debt capital, clearly we don't have that kind of leverage ability, nor would we want to take that kind of risk. So we will need access to equity capital, and we think this helps to provide significantly greater depth to the equity capital market that we otherwise wouldn't have had in our partnership structure.
Got it. That's a great answer. Switching gears real fast. I had actually a question on, actually on labor availability and supply chain issues, but I think you touched on that pretty extensively. Just tying that in with sort of your guidance, it appears like you certainly raised your outlook for the year, it looks like most of the wave and we don't dive into the quarter, but looks like most of the raise is from the beat in the quarter, the difference from the expectations? And without getting into specifics, is that sort of, - I am not in the right ballpark here, and you're kind of holding the line in the back half of the year, just because of these uncertainties with labor and supply chain issues? And who knows what actual demand, what trajectory demand is COVID it's still kind of waxing and waning. Is that a fair assessment?
Yeah, Larry, I think that spot on. I would say we were frankly, pleasantly surprised by the strength of our second quarter results. And there's just a lot of uncertainty, I heard from other companies, none of us have ever gone through a pandemic and a reopening of the economy. And what that portends for our businesses is very much uncertain, and as you know, we strive to get reasonable guidance that we can beat.
And so we tend to be somewhat conservative when we look at kind of where our guidance is. We wanted to and I think we said in our scripted comments, demand is not the issue. Now, there are certain companies like Sterno or Arnold in the aerospace division, where frankly we would like more demand, and we have the capacity to supply more demand.
But broadly across the portfolio, we have demand that remains in excess of what we can supply. And so, what we are seeing are some of the inflationary elements come through, we've talked about and we said in our script, like other companies were passing on price. But it's too early right now, for us to understand with any clarity, what the elasticity of demand is, whether some of those price increases that are meant to protect margin are going to hurt future demand.
And so when we're in these inflection points that we feel like right now, I mean if you went back over time, I would say over the last pretty much 15 years that we've been a public company, for the vast majority of that we've sat in a disinflationary environment. And so we're at an inflection now, where we're seeing inflation come in, we're seeing a lot of supply constraints come in, this is something unusual to the past 15 year operating environment we are in. And so we're choosing to be way more conservative in the outlook that we have, and sort of hold where our guidance is, just because we don't know how that is all play out.
Now, that being said, I'll continue to reiterate, where we stand through the month of July, so one-third through the quarter, demand is holding up remarkably well, in fact, probably in excess of what our expectations are thus far in July, and if that continues, I think we feel pretty good about the remainder of the year.
Great. Just last question. Like [indiscernible] subsidiary question. I was going to be on 5.11, that's looks like a great number, but we've kind of been stifled there. So just a hands on Sterno, just to clarify. Did you say that was a $5 million hit to EBITDA to sales, I think you said EBITDA and that and that product from Sterno Home.
There is a piece of our Canadian operations that we're restructuring and total it's, I think the accounting rules can't be a one-time charge anymore, but if there will be a sort of extraordinary expense in the back half of the year, that EBITDA of $4 million to $5 million.
Got it. Okay, great, I appreciate that. Okay guys, thanks again.
Thank you, Larry.
Thanks Larry.
Our next question comes from Matt Koranda of ROTH Capital. Your line is open, please go ahead.
Hey, guys, good afternoon. Thanks. I don't want to get too far down the road here. But if we think about sort of the situation post-tax reclassification, just wanted to get your preliminary thoughts on sort of, how should we be thinking about tax expense post, checking the box if and when we get to that point?
And then also, you mentioned, probably the ability to present more of an adjusted EPS figure on a go forward basis. So just wanted to give you an opportunity to maybe talk a little bit about how you envisioned sort of presenting that, what are some of the elements that will go into it? How's it going to compare to CAD?
Okay, hi Matt. I'll touch on the tax question. With respect to the second question, I think we're still developing that. And I think internally we're working through that, but the plan is to provide more color on the next earnings call. And then potentially come out with comparable periods, and provide some depth so that people can see trends and things. But that'll be a little bit TBD for now.
But with respect to your question on income tax expense, just to take a step back to the structure, all of our companies down below our C-Corp, federal tax payers. So the only income that is coming up to CODI is primarily interest income, because we're their lender, and they're paying us interest as their lender. And that is offset though with interest expense at CODI and that if you look at the subsidiaries, we have an interest income and expense we have that's going to be going forward, at least initially, to be in a negative position, okay. So we'll have more interest expense at CODI's level, then we have interest income, okay.
And then the other income streams would be dividend income, if we have some sort of recapitalization of a subsidiary or capital gain tax if we were to sell a business for a gain.
So in a year that we don't have a recap or a sizable capital gain, we're going to be in an NOL position, okay. So it's really, we'll be building a benefit in a given year, that can then be applied on a future period, should we have taxable income. Okay, so I think it's always hard to know when we'll have a sale or a recap. But I think from a modeling standpoint, you shouldn't think about us having actual cash tax expense at the CODI level, going out the door until we have one of those two income events. Does that make sense?
Okay, yeah, totally, very helpful. And then maybe one for Elias on M&A. I know at the end you sort of talked a little bit about your views. And maybe my interpretation, as you sounded a little bit more cautious on deployment of cash requisitions, kind of given the environment we're in, multiples expanding and whatnot. So am I hearing that right? And then, are you seeing any pockets that are still interesting, maybe just a little bit more color on where those interesting opportunities may lie if there are any deployment?
Yeah, Matt so, the M&A market came back with bigger and I would say it was probably the shortest period where you could deploy at attractive prices in a recession that I've experienced. And I think there's just the function of if you think of all the capital that sloshing around in the market, I think we all are aware, there's this back that had been raised at a kind of a massive level. And they have timelines, they need to deploy capital, private equity is washed with capital, and debt availability has come back and come back more aggressive than it was at the end of the back cycle.
So all of that is just creating an enormous amount of demand for the assets. Now, we are seeing a lot more assets come to market, I mean, it's kind of the natural workings of the marketplace. If you have demand for something eventually prices would go up and supply comes in, but we're just being elevated kind of pricing based on these dynamics, and we expect that to continue.
So as we did with the Liberty Safe divestiture, we're always looking for ways to take advantage for our shareholders, even if it means we may have a short term under optimization of our balance sheet. If you're looking at it over a longer period of time, I think being able to capitalize on market condition is always kind of what we strive to do. And right now asset pricing is high.
So what it boils down to is, are we looking to deploy capital, you heard in the comments to Larry, our growth goals are to get to a billion dollars of EBITDA, we guided 350 to 374 this year, and that includes Liberty Safe, which is going to be running out. So to get from here to there, we're going to have to deploy, and we're going to have to buy new companies. I would say we continue to focus on add on opportunities, there's some good opportunities for some of the more subscale companies that are there, where we have a platform where we can create some cost saving opportunities, through consolidation, or some revenue synergies.
And then on top of that, we're always open for a new platform. And I think, importantly, where we stand today versus years ago, and we've continued to beat on this over and over and over again, we have the best cost of capital, we believe, of any of our peers in the middle market private equity. And as a result of that, we can reach and we can get in and be the winning buyer, on the really premium assets.
I think for us, it's about finding those really great opportunities, and being able to run hard against those, and now having the cost of capital that allows those to be accretive right away, versus before trying to reach for some of the more premium assets would have created a dilutive near term outlook. And that was something that would be difficult for us to absorb.
So we feel we're just fundamentally positioned so much better. But just to be more succinct in your answer. Yeah, it is a market that favors divestitures, now more so that it favors deployment of capital. But our business and our teams are to go out and find great opportunities to get capital deployed. So I don't want to make it sound like, we will be seeing new assets that we're acquiring both on platform and add on, we absolutely will be it's just our teams are working harder to be able to find those opportunities.
Makes total sense, thanks for all the detail. And as maybe just in keeping what the theme of asking a second question. Pat, you mentioned that BOA was on a pretty strong run rate since you guys bought it. And that we shouldn't necessarily count on that growth rate to kind of sustain through the back half of this year. So just wanted to get a little bit more granularity on that, what drove the stronger than expected growth rate, as well in the first half, and then what sort of the was the headwinds are contending with the back half of the year?
Sure. I mean, as I mentioned, we're - we've had an explosive first half, I mean, I think we grew by 100%, or sort of doubled. For us to forecast that in the second half, I don't think would be appropriate. Honestly, we had a stronger back half last year than we had this year. I do think we'll grow in the second half of the year, I think we'll have nice growth, we see continued demand.
We have some worry that there's a whole restocking aspect or covers were buried in certain number categories, that some of our OEM partners are doing that. We have some worries that there was an ordering ahead, because some of our partners were worried about the supply chain disruptions. But all that being said, we still see strong demand, we do see supply chain issues, just like we do in every other business, but our management team is working definitely through that.
We believe we're taking market share and we believe we have a great product and a great technology that the company has developed. And it's just sort of catching on. And it's a really global business. So a lot of it maybe - may not be as visible to us here in North America. But we're very confident in the back half, what we just don't think we're going to quite see those growth rates that we saw in the first half as they were pretty dependent.
Fair enough. Thank you, Pat, I'll jump back in queue here. Thanks, guys.
Our next question comes from Kyle Joseph of Jefferies. Your line is open. Please go ahead.
Hey, afternoon, guys. Congrats on a really good quarter. And thanks for taking my questions. I'll start, Ryan, I think you said it but I missed it. Where is leverage currently and then kind of can you give us a sense where you expect that to be pro forma of the Liberty tail?
Yeah, sure. Kyle, thanks for the question and appreciate the nice comments. It was a great quarter. So we ended leverage at the end of March, just below three times, kind of 2.9 level, we've come down to 2.64, I believe is the exact number. And that's all through organic deleveraging. I mean, that was just truly through cash coming to our balance sheet, through working capital optimization, but also extraordinary EBITDA performance, so really good organic leveraging.
The Liberty proceeds, once we receive them, as you might have seen in that release, portion of that will be earmarked to our anticipated special distribution when we check the box, but the delta of that will sit on the balance sheet as cash. So we do not have any pre payable debt right now, we got nothing outstanding on the revolver and just the outstanding bond. So it will sit as cash on our balance sheet as we seek to deploy it. But that will bring our leverage down another sort of 10th, I'd call it. So the expectation is to be sort of closer to 2.5, I'd say, by the end of the third quarter.
Great, thanks. And then just a follow-up for me, as modeling out the companies for ' 22. Any companies you'd highlight as being insulated from whether it'd be supply chain disruption, or inflationary pressures? And then any companies you expect to kind of be more exposed, if you will?
I mean, I think we see supply chain pressures everywhere. I mean, those that are - so I guess it's broad, and it's just a matter of degrees. But again, most of our companies are positioned in a way to where they can have a good chunk of that group and they're working hard to do that. So it's just a matter of degrees. They're all facing it, it's something the entire economy.
Got it. Yes, totally fair. It's kind of like asking to pick your favorite child. So understood. And thanks for answering my questions.
Thank you, Kyle.
Thanks Kyle.
Our next question comes from Chris Kennedy of William Blair. Your line is open, please go ahead.
Hey, guys, thanks for taking the question and a lot of exciting things happening. Elias, can you just talk a little bit about going forward. I remember, at your investor day, you talked about potentially looking into new verticals, beyond the niche industrial and consumer side? Any progress or update on that?
Yeah, Cris, and thanks for the question. It continues to be a priority area for us. I think we believe that healthcare is probably a vertical that we would like to pursue whether it's kind of the next vertical or not a little bit of its fluid, because it's around finding the right individual with the right experience, and the right domain knowledge, and then building out around that. I think the stars all aligned, and that was somebody who had experience in the healthcare space, that is what we're seeking, but it's a little bit of a longer fuse, to be honest, because we have to find the right individual, that person, and make sure that kind of the fit from an investment philosophy from a cultural standpoint is right.
So it's something we are working hard on, we would hope over the course of by the end of 22, that we have somebody landed that can start that effort for us. But that's something that we continue to focus on. In the meantime, we continue to add on the HR side, we're in that we're adding on our investment team, almost done a kind of annual basis, we're adding a couple of few people, we continue to staff up because we are building for what we see in the future as a firm that could be substantially larger than we are today. And adding a vertical becomes sort of part and parcel to that.
Fantastic. And then just, I guess the follow-up, as you go towards a billion of EBITDA, does your targets - kind of your target size increase a lot and just kind of talk about how that changes going forward, especially with a lower cost of capital? Thanks a lot, guys.
Sure, and I think that's a great observation, Cris. I mean our goal is to own companies that have going forward have the ability to reach at least $50 million of EBITDA, that sort of internally where we kind of strive to get to some companies, they're going to be able to do it through organic growth. Some companies, they're going to need consolidation opportunities to do it. And frankly, some companies aren't going to be equipped to be able to get there.
And I would say look at the most recent divestiture that we made at Liberty Safe is totally in connection with that strategic vision that we want a company to be bigger. I mean, Liberty is a great business, its run by great people, we've had a wonderful relationship with, Steve Allred, Justin Buck, I mean guys that we've worked with, literally for over a decade, it is a company that has delivered over delivered on the expectations that we had.
But the reality is, we weren't going to be able to get it to a materially larger size. And that's one of the strategic rationales that we've put in place in our business here is that we want companies that can get to that 50, a 100, even a $150 million EBITDA size over time, and managing a larger pool of companies, or a larger size of companies, not necessarily just a greater number of companies.
So that's sort of where we're focused on. I would say, as we think about new platform opportunities, they generally are going to be larger, or they're going to have better growth prospects, if they're smaller organic, like a Marucci, for example, which has outstanding growth prospects, or they have really good consolidation opportunities.
I think there's a lot of strategic benefits as you get larger companies in the portfolio. As you know, some of the public company things that we do with respect to stock and compliance that is a little easier to absorb as a public company. And we don't just give lip service to the ESG, efforts that we're putting in place, these are things that we are going to be forcing down on our subsidiary companies, we're doing that at the holding company right now in a really expanded effort. So as we start to put more and more things in place that are more public company in nature and less kind of smaller private company, it helps if we have larger companies in this table.
Great. Thanks a lot, guys.
Thank you.
Our next question comes from Derek Hewitt, of Bank of America. Your line is open, please go ahead.
Good evening, everyone, and congrats on the record quarter. Now 5.11 and Liberty, they represent about 25% to 30% of either revenue or EBITDA. So given the comment earlier that the business really needs to scale, how do you balance opportunities to potentially harvest subsidiaries at attractive valuations versus maybe generating more predictable growth and some sort of adjusted earnings calculation, which could also impact valuation assuming that the C-Corp conversion goes forward?
Yeah, and thanks Derek, this is Elias for the nice comments, it was a record quarter and we're really proud of our team that the subsidiaries are being able to execute and set the high level, and against the backdrop of so much uncertainty. But it's a great question. I mean, our business model is frankly, different than most companies out there, because a portion of what we do is opportunistically diverse. And I think that's really what makes us different and creates more opportunities for shareholder value creation.
But sometime, when you are in divestment window and the market gives you the opportunity. And so we have to kind of reap the tea leaves and take what opportunity market is giving us. And as part of that there are going to be times when we will be under earning our balance sheet potential. You saw it in 2019, when we divested in Manitoba harvest cleaner, and we did it at record multiples. There was a period where we were going to have lower EBITDA on its aggregate basis, outright dollar value, we were going to have lower earnings.
As you remember, we waive management fee, because it's always been our view, that if we're going to under earn for a potential of time, then the manager should also under its potential. So, we aligned with our shareholders that have done that in the past. But there are times when the best decision that you can make outside of the optics of what you're going to have maybe aggregate lower adjusted EPS or aggregate lower EBITDA, is to have assessment and you're taking advantage of the market conditions. And I think that we've always run the business with a kind of more intermediate and longer view and not next to the short term view and we've said, let the opportunity that the market is giving us dictate what's the strategy right that is.
So, yes, it's possible with the Liberty divestment, and other strategic alternatives that we're looking at right now that we could have a smaller portfolio and a smaller balance sheet kind of later in this year or into next year, for a period of time until we can redeploy that.
But I would point back to look at how much earnings leverage comes from making the right decision. When we divested these assets in 2019 for hitting obviously now a pandemic hit, what we were looking squarely down, lower earning and lower aggregate EBITDA in 2020. But then we took proceeds from selling at really great multiples, and redeployed, that into two great growth businesses, and now 2021, our earnings have exploded higher. And I think if you went back and looked at 2019, compared to where we've guided right now, we're talking about 2020 being like 50 for 2021, being like, 50% up in CAD over where we were in 2019.
And so if you take a slightly longer kind of viewpoint to do and what we think, we're kind of asked to do, then taking advantage of market opportunities even that shrink the balance sheet in a near term capacity always worked out in build, I think, greater value, as evidence of the kind of results that we're putting up this year.
Okay, thank you. And then in terms of your longer-term adjusted EBITDA goal, is that possible with many verticals, do you think you would need to be able to kind of meet that, that longer term goal?
Yeah, I mean, to be honest, we think we probably could build with the verticals that we have, I think that it becomes more probable if we can add another vertical. Over time, I think we would like to probably have one or two more, I think there is a limit to how much we would like. And given that we've had two verticals now for a decade or so once we started to verticalize our business, I don't think we're looking to kind of stamp these out, like at an accelerated pace. But I think if we could do one more, it makes getting to a billion dollars of EBITDA more probable and very achievable.
That being said, I want to let everyone know, we still believe that the verticals we're in, there's a broad enough set of target it clear position extremely well, both on capital availability, cost of capital and human capital, to be able to achieve that billion dollar goal, even if we don't add another vertical.
Okay, thank you very much.
Thank you, Derek.
Our next question comes from Matt Tjaden of Raymond James. Your line is open, please go ahead.
Good afternoon everybody and I appreciate you taking my questions. First one for me continuing on the tax reclassification, kind of on a longer term perspective, how does checking the box change, how you think about acquisition candidates, whether that be in terms of a deal pricing or target structure? Any thoughts there would be of interest?
Yeah, Matt, so the checking of the box won't have any impact on the way that we look at acquisition, in terms of how we structure the acquisition, as Ryan has said, kind of, it's, we have a little bit different flavor of income that flows up to the holding company. And so I think on the acquisition side, it really is going to have no impact whatsoever, we're really could have impact is on the divestment side, where the company then will have an incremental tax. But frankly, that was the incremental tax that our shareholders were going to be able to ask to pay in the prior structure.
So if I think about it, from a holistic standpoint, there's no incremental tax and there's no kind of view towards a change of strategy and our acquisition or divestment. And if I circle back to Larry's initial question, on benefits of the potential tax structure. We do view having our equity being more accessible by a much broader group of investors, who frankly have shown interest in the past, but for the fact that investing in a partnership was something that was very difficult for a lot of people, we think additional demand on the shares naturally should and were to all of our shareholders benefit through higher share prices, and then to a company with a lower cost of equity capital. So I guess, that could sort of shape a little bit of our acquisition decision making. What I would say in terms of kind of how we run the business, we don't look at this structure changes impacting it at all.
Okay, fair enough. I guess just another quick one for me on Sterno. So I know last quarter, we talked about, venues opening again, having some sort of benefit to Sterno, with cases back on the rise in the delta variant, is there any risk of a near term kind of softening at Sterno?
Yes, it did quite the answer. I'd say, we haven't gotten quite back even before if you think about, June I think was probably our best month since before the pandemic, as far as bookings goes on the sort of food service side. And again, those levels were still materially off of sort of pre pandemic levels. But it's - the food service side is a real time indicator, and as sort of events shrink, and the number of venues that are open to shrink, it will have an impact on the food service segment.
So that being said, our consumer side and some of our waxes and our essential oils are a little bit of a natural hedge for that. And that when people spend more time at home, they tend to spend it purchase more of those. It doesn't quite make up for the whole impact that you're talking about, if we were to go back into a lockdown or something like that again, but it is a little bit of a hedge. Does that make sense?
That's it for me. Appreciate the time and congrats on a good quarter.
Thanks, Matt.
There are no further questions on the telephone line. So I'll hand the call back over to Elias Sabo.
Thank you, operator. As always, I'd like to thank everyone again for joining us on today's call and for your continued interest in CODI. We look forward to sharing our progress with you in the future. That ends our remarks, thank you operator.
This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining you may now disconnect your lines.