Calix Inc
NYSE:CALX
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
27.73
44.53
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Greetings, everyone, and welcome to the Calix First Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Jim Fanucchi, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.
Thank you, Melissa, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our first quarter 2024 earnings call. Today on the call, we have President and CEO, Michael Weening and Chief Financial Officer, Cory Sindelar. As a reminder, yesterday, after the market closed, Calix issued a news release, which was furnished on a Form 8-K, along with our stockholder letter and was also posted in the Investor Relations section of the Calix website. Today's conference call will be available for webcast replay in the Investor Relations section of our website. Before I turn the call over to Michael for his opening remarks, I want to remind everyone on this call, we will refer to forward-looking statements, including all statements the company will make about its future financial and operating performance, growth strategy and market outlook, and actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results and trends to differ materially are set forth in the first quarter 2024 letter to stockholders and in the annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC. Calix assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their respective dates. Also in this conference call, we will discuss both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in the first quarter 2024 letter to stockholders. Unless otherwise stated, all financial information referenced on this call will be non-GAAP. With that, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Michael. Michael, please go ahead.
Thank you, Jim. Our results in the first quarter demonstrated the continued execution and strength of our strategy. Our platform, Cloud and Managed services are enabling our Broadband customers to succeed against their competitors every day. Their success delivers value to their stakeholders and in turn, to Calix. Our unique Broadband business model delivered record gross margins as BSP's deployment of the Calix platform, Cloud and Managed services continued unabated. However, our appliance business remains challenged in the same way the market is with larger customers reevaluating their CapEx plans. This trend continued into the second quarter, which we did not forecast. Now that we understand this larger customer dynamic, we have adjusted our expectations accordingly. At the same time, however, it highlighted the ongoing strength of our smaller BSP customers. While growth in this set of customers is muted by new build in decision around BEAD, the business as usual part of their operations, completing existing network builds and filling those networks by winning new subscribers remains robust. Leading indicators from infrastructure vendors that deploy fiber, combined with green shoots in our customer base, lead us to forecast that the second quarter will be the bag of our appliance revenue. Regarding BEAD and as we have said, we believe revenue will begin in early '25, and we will lead. Working with customers to help them win government funds is something that we have done for 15 years. Recently, you saw us create a partnership with industry-leading funding solution provider, redy.net. This partnership enables us to leverage Ready.net tools as part of our existing funding consult program, connecting our more than 1,600 Calix customers with a streamlined portal to apply for and win grant funds, secure capital and adhere to public funding requirements. Earlier this month, we announced that 74% of federally funded BSPs use Calix for their Broadband speed test. This is a significant indicator of future success as any BSP who received government stimulus must routinely report back on the speed they are delivering to their customers. This is a complicated undertaking that we've made symbol via our platform, Cloud and Managed solutions. We expect that 74% figure to grow. While the largest government stimulus program is soon to be here, we've been actively landing new footprint as our consolidated network delivers the lowest cost per bit per mile infrastructure and up to 80% month reduction in operating expense as demonstrated at Verizon. Unlike in times past when many new accounts were startups, the 10 new accounts recorded in the first quarter all came from existing service providers. We intend to maintain our aggressive stance in the market at this critical time. Finally, and most importantly, the wave of disruption is speeding up. Larger service providers are engaging in conversations with Calix to help them build a more valuable business by avoiding commoditization. Two examples from the first weeks of Q2 include signing the largest Cloud deal in our history and a larger service provider selecting smart bids. Both are indicators that we are crossing the chasm in this disruption. With that, I'd like to turn it over to Cory to review our financial results for the quarter.
Thank you, Michael. The first quarter represented another quarter of deliberate and disciplined execution. We delivered revenue of $226.3 million, which was within the guidance range we provided in January. Against the crosswinds prevalent in our industry, the continued growth in our platform, Cloud and Managed services drove record non-GAAP gross margin of 54.9%. In the first quarter, we saw platform adoption with [Indiscernible] customers beginning their platform journey with us and 27 customers to pulling a Managed service for the first time. In the first quarter of 2024, non-GAAP operating expenses were $108.4 million, down $1.6 million from the prior quarter. The decrease is attributed to our Connections event, which occurs each year in the fourth quarter. As we talked about in our last call, our plan is to keep 2024 operating expense investments relatively consistent with 2023 as we continue to believe that this level of investment represents a great opportunity for us to grow our footprint ahead of the U.S. government Broadband investment. Our debt-free balance sheet remains strong. At the end of the first quarter, cash and investments were nearly $240 million, representing a sequential increase of $19 million. This was our fourth consecutive quarter of double-digit free cash flow. Turning to the first quarter. Our supply chain continued to normalize. We exited Q1 with purchase commitments falling another $29 million from year-end to $147 million. Inventory deposits declined by $2 million, and our inventory turns were 3.1%, down from 3.3 last quarter as our component inventory increased. Excluding component inventory, our inventory turns would have been greater than 4. Furthermore, we expect these reductions in working capital requirements, combined with continued profitability will result in consistent quarterly double-digit operating and free cash flow. During the first quarter, we repurchased $4 million of our common stock, bringing our total common stock repurchases over the last year to $89 million. Our repurchase program remains in place with approximately $110 million available at the end of the first quarter. Now let's discuss our revenue guidance for the second quarter. As Michael has discussed, there currently are several crosswinds in our industry. As a result of these factors, our second quarter of 2024 outlook is for revenue to be between $197 million and $203 million. The forecasted decline in revenue from the first quarter is mostly due to the continued delay of purchasing decisions at a few of our medium and large customers. Looking out a bit further, we believe the June quarter will set the bottom for revenue as revenue from a few significant customers will have diminished to a point where there is limited downside risk. When you combine the green shoots from our smaller customer base with footprint expansion, we believe we will return to revenue growth. In summary, while cross wins affect our top line in the near term, our platform, Cloud and Managed Services will continue to grow unabated and drive gross margin expansion. And with the industry's strongest balance sheet, we have the financial resources to invest in our operations and grow our footprint in advance of the U.S. government Broadband investments. Michael, back to you.
Thank you, Cory. As I have shared, I meet with Broadband customers and their investors constantly. It is clear they are understanding the disruption that faces legacy network operators, which is critical to our crossing the chasm from early adopters to winning an early majority. With more than 1,000 customers deploying our platform, it is no surprise that we are engaging with ever larger prospects who are interested in how our BSP customers are achieving their incredible revenue, margin, cash flow and customer satisfaction results. The entire Calix team remains energized by the opportunity to expand our platform Cloud and Managed Services business. At the same time, with more than 60 million new fiber connections forecasted in the next 5 years, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to land new network footprint and enable our BSP customers to win new subscribers, thereby filling those networks with an expanding portfolio of managed services. This will be supercharged by the BEAT funds that begin in '25. While only 1 state has completed all 10 steps in the BEAD process, 42 other states have completed 9 of the 10 steps to begin funding. In closing, I want to reiterate that we are confident in our long-term outlook. We have a talented and motivated team executing our strategy every day. We have unique technology that positions us to serve this wave and take advantage of new network builds. We have the financial strength and balance sheet that allows us to avoid any distractions. Therefore, we intend to keep a steady and disciplined hand on our operating expense investments as we maximize this opportunity and help our customers win. Jim, let's open the call for questions.
Thank you, Michael. Melissa, please open the call for questions at this time.
[Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company.
Just unpacking your customer segments there a bit. It looks like your Tier 3s are the smaller customers relatively stable here but the medium and large really hurting. How should we think about the trajectory of those segments going forward here into 2Q? And then how do you think about them in the second half at this early stage from a high level?
And as we outlined in our letter, we're continuing to see green shoots coming out of that smaller customer base. And the decline from Q1 to Q2 is really focused on those medium and large customers. To put a point on it, those segments in the fourth quarter were $77 million of revenue. And in the first quarter, they turned out to be about 43%. We didn't expect continued deterioration a quarter ago, but clearly, they are still stuck in their capital planning processes and we're not forecasting them to we have to get from that 43 level. So those segments really have not much more further to go. And so we think at this point, why Q2 has bottomed, and we're confident that from here on out, we got to be able to grow.
And a quick follow if I could, please, on your product mix here in terms of Revenue edge, Intelligent Access Edge. Should we think of that Intelligent Access Edge as the trajectory for your new footprint gain? I actually thought it might be a little worse than that and might see a more of a mix toward selling and Revenue EDGE, but how should we interpret those 2 product segments?
Well, so on the Intelligent Access Edge, that's a mix of new network gains but also our existing customers, filling out the network builds that they currently have. And so as we said, we saw some real -- you see the continued strength in our rural customers who are in the smaller segment to continue to build out those networks successfully. And that's why you see that underpin strength. And I would say that as we go forward and you start to see those 60 million fiber lines start to get billed out, you're definitely going to see the Intelligent Access Edge search. On the Revenue Edge side, that is the business as usual part of our business where that's what they used to acquire new subscribers. And so you're going to see that continue on. And in fact, as we took 10 customers last quarter, and therefore, those ones are generally caps and grows where they're saying, "I have an existing fiber network, I'm worried about commoditization. I need to differentiate my business in my markets and Calix's best positioned to do that.
So it's fair to say that the Intelligent Access Edge number includes a healthy component of sell-in, fill in edge out from existing networks, but entirely new footprint is down much more than that.
And that's back to the decision with regards to decision-making as they work through, do I invest my dry powder and the capital that I have in a new network build? Or do I use the funding that's now almost 6 months, 7, 8 months out and the beef funding and go after that instead of using my existing capital. So in the future, you will definitely see a swing up on the network side as they begin to deploy those BEAD funds and we take footprint.
Our next question comes from the line of George Notter with Jefferies.
I wanted to ask the BEAD question. I think you said 6 to 8 months out. Look, I know the BEAD program is a little bit controversial in terms of the process and the potential for delays. Can you handicap the BEAD process? Do you really think that the monies are flowing by year-end in the 6 to 8 months out? Or do you think it's a program that has the potential to slip?
And so over the last 3 years, others have been asserting that it would be coming earlier. We've been very consistent with regards to our views that would take significantly longer to arrive. And then when it does arrive, it's going to be a lot larger than people anticipate. So what's our view on it? Is we see it as 2025. In early 2025, we think that you'll start to see some trickles, and then it will go from that. 2025 is the year.
You could see from the NTIA's website that they made some good progress in terms of getting states approved through the volume on or the challenge process. If you include the territories, they went from 29% last quarter to $47 million. I would expect that the NTIA will start working more on the volume too and getting more states approved. But you're right, until you start seeing those states get approved, this can continue to slip like any government funds. That's where I'm continuing to launch that. I'm encouraged by what I saw happen in the last 90 days, and we'll see what the next 91 days average.
And then just as a follow-up, I think you guys were talking about the overhang associated with BEAD. We talked about network planners going offline as a result of the wage for effect associated with BEAD, you talked about the strength in your smaller customers, is that something that you're seeing right now in the smaller customer base? Or is that something you're looking at more prospectively as the year goes on? Or how do you think about that effect and how it layers into your business timing wise?
We identified that in January of this year, we stated that this is going to be an impact through first half. And so we saw that in Q1, and we see that in Q2. You see a profound impact on some of the larger customers as they're working through this. With our existing customer base, they still are going through that decision-making process. So a portion of them have made a decision to not apply for BEAD, but there are a portion of them that are continuing on. Therefore, are pursuing the -- therefore, that indecision continues, and you see it lesser in the smaller customers and more profound in the medium and large.
Our next question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan.
But you did call out in 1Q as well certain significant customers that were pausing spend. You are calling that out as a headwind in this release as well. I'm just wondering when you look at the breadth of the customers that are pausing, is that just expanding in terms of the breadth as you go into the back end of the year, is that really becoming a more evident trend? Or it is typically remaining constrained to a few. I think you had called out 3 signify customers last quarter that hit pause. Is it remaining constrained to those? And I have a follow-up.
Cory, that's a great question for you to answer and identify the shift from Q4 to Q2 and how we did not anticipate it continuing in the second quarter.
It is largely 2 customers that have continued to have delays in their capital decision. And so it's not a broadening. It's really more focused on those couple. And when you take a look at what they did, we were at $77 million in Q4 of last year. It's 43 in the current and anticipated to be about half that in Q2. So no, it's not broadening out. It's still tied to largely predominantly those 2 customers in particular. And that's why we feel confident in calling the bottom. The small spot segment remains very robust. We've demonstrated that. And while they may have some pause in their decision-making, they continue to expand out with their initial or with their existing network builds and winning subscribers. We've seen green shoots in everything that we're doing. If you actually look at last year, as inventory turns decline, we saw obviously our funnel decline in the same way. And we've also seen that turnaround. Our funnel is now expanding, and you also see lead indicators from fiber builders like Dotcom who called out that they're starting to see those green shoots and they're also expanding. So that's why we feel comfortable calling the bottom. And then in the second half, we'll start seeing the expansion.
And for my follow-up, one of the interesting things you highlighted in the shareholder letter is even as customers are pausing some of the new network builds, they're focusing more on subscriber trends and monetization of the subscribers, I assume, which leads me saying there should be more interest for your Cloud platforms overall. But I know you've outlined that in Q2, you will continue to grow them. But what are you seeing in terms of trends? Are you seeing in the acting trends just on account of the customers relying more on you for those services in the meantime as network bills get passed? Any insights on that? Because I would think that you would have a counterbalancing effect on the service on the Cloud platforms there.
And in fact, it's exactly like that. I actually had a prospect who's never done business with us last week, used the following term you stated. We did not have the time over the last 3 years to the pandemic to pour a cup of coffee, let alone consider a different business strategy. But through this pause and some of the challenges that are going on in the industry, we actually took a step back and we started to look at you as an alternative. And through our conversation, we realized that you're not an alternative that you're the choice that we should be making because you're not coming to us talking about building a dumb fiber network. What you're actually talking about is building out a diversified business strategy that is very comprehensive for the consumer, expand into small business and has a vision to go into medium. And then at the same time, differentiates the local brand with the community through assets like smart charger. And so in this type of scenario where they did not have that breathing room to even consider it, they now do. And this represents what we've been stating in Q2, Q4 and now in Q2 again, that this represents a massive opportunity to surge through that, demonstrate the value that we can have to their business and set ourselves up for a decade to come. And so that's why we're so enthusiastic about the pause that's happening in the market right now. It creates an opportunity with those customers to actually take the time to think and recognize that there's a big shift happening and they have an opportunity to partner with Calix.
Our next question comes from the line of Scott Searle with ROTH MKM.
Mike, maybe just to quickly clarify a couple of items. Looking at the down quarter into June and the weakness in the medium and large customers, are they entirely the cause of the downward sequential move from the first quarter to the second quarter would imply another 40%, 50% sequential decline similar to what we saw in the current March quarter? Or are you seeing some softening as well on the small business front? And as we look into the second half of this year, I wanted to clarify that recovery, is it all small business driven? And when you say BEAD in early '25, I'm assuming that's the initial spending that you're talking about as opposed to awards. Just want to clarify that, and then I had a follow-up.
So Cory clearly stated that when revenue has declined from 77 to 43 in the medium large and then we're anticipating and having again in second quarter that we fully attribute what's happening to that segment. And then as we stated in the investor letter, our small segment continues to be strong. And then we look at as they're going through this decision-making process, as I just stated, is a significant opportunity for us to actually surge in where they have the mind share and the time to think, where they can consider us as an alternative and our business model, which in the end is crossing the cost CASM from us, moving from the really innovative folks like Al and others who really get it and have already deployed and recognized that they want to build a different business to differentiate in the markets. So the network operators are now starting to see the challenges and looking to fill that network. So yes, it's attributed to medium and large. No, we do not see a shortfall in the small. In fact, we see them continuing to invest and grow, and that will lead to strength in the second half.
And then the last question, Scott, you asked about was around BEAD. And yes, we're talking about not just awards, but revenue beginning in '25.
And if I could, just on the BEAD, you're working with multiple customers right now in terms of facilitating their process and obviously engaging with them. Is there a number in terms of the amount of requests that your customers have put in or some magnitude help us understand what that dollar amount could actually look like? And I was wondering if you would clarify Trickle [indiscernible] and where you think this could peak out in terms of annual contribution from BEAD funding as we get into '26, '27and beyond?
No, we don't have a number of pill with that. The only number that we will provide is that we've had well over 500 consults that we've engaged with, with customers and helping them understand where the different funds are. That's not only be, but it's also a state level, that's trial, all those different groups that we've been working with. I was at the Tribal Summit 2 weeks ago, and there were hundreds and hundreds of tribes there who are contemplating that government funding, which is directed at their markets. So I would just say that we are incredibly active as we put in shareholder letter. We also have partnered with Ready.net, who is very active with our customers and helping them understand where the funding is, how to pursue it, what the maths are, and where we see incremental value in that is, as we've done with previous programs over the last 15 years, we see that as expanding beyond just the funding part of it, which is a great opportunity for us to partner with our customers into how do they stay compliant over the long term through the testing. Currently, as I stated earlier in my remarks, 74% of federally funded customers in the U.S. today use us for speed test. That should be a very good indicator with regards to the capabilities that we provide a broadband service provider who pursues government funding on how to make it simple and successful.
Our next question comes from the line of Michael Genovese with Rosenblatt Securities.
I just want to check first on a couple of more bear thesis points and just get your view on them. First of all, at OFC, Cisco was talking about basically going after the medium customer market with PON technology with a PON card handing off a router similar to the Ciena solution. So just wanted to check if there's anything market share is going on in the Tier 2 market or if this is all just customer valuation delays as you spoke about?
There is a competitive thing going on. We're taking footprint. So that's what's going on. And so that being said, our acquisition of that footprint, like the 10 customers that we won in Q1, it takes time for them to actually burn through their previous inventory, make the transitions all the different elements. And so those are the green shoots that we've been referring to. With regards to other people coming into our market, bringing on.
And then on the tier large, medium, small customer question having to do with BEAD, there's just been some people talking about how -- and I don't know how they can predict this, but they are predicting that at the end of the day, and I don't know if this is correct, but people are saying, BEAD might go more towards the large and the medium customers and less towards the small customer base at the end of the day. And so I don't know where that call is coming from or how people could say that. You're working with all these customers. What's your confidence that your small customers who make up 80% of your revenues are going to be winners in the BEAD process? Like just detail where that confidence comes from? And any data points you can give us there?
Well, to be clear, though, we didn't say BEAD is going to go to small customers. We said actually BEAD is going to go to the market, small, medium and large. We called out that our medium and large segment is down as they go through their decision-making process. But that should be an indicator that, that should then swing back as they acquire that funding. With regards to who's going to win, all 3 segments are going to compete for that money aggressively. But to be clear, BEAD is focused on the really rural, underserved customers. And in fact, when I've engaged with the NTIA around this, they are aggressively trying to ensure that small service providers do participate. And then it just doesn't go to large because if the small teams do not actually participate in BEAD, that's going to be bad for America. Why? Because they're the ones who actually have invested in nowhere USA because they live there. They love their community, and they've done those investments with or without government funding and the NTIA is reliant on them continuing that community-centric buyingset to make very rural situations successful. So anyone who says that it's just going to be one segment or another, I don't agree. We don't agree. It's going to be all 3 segments participating at different levels. And in all 3 segments, we have good relationships and therefore, we'll be able to support them all.
And then finally for me, just looking past this, as we get to 2025, I know it's early to give an outlook for beyond 1 quarter or 1 year. But do you think that we could get back to a 10% to 15% type of growth rate in '25? Or do you think we'll be ramping towards that in the first half of '25 and maybe don't get there until 2026 on a full year basis. Just the long-term annual growth rate starting in 2025, how are you thinking about it?
We did that consistently for 4 years, and we expect that once we get through this peculiar indecision phase that we will get back to that. And as I stated in my opening remarks, the first thing I stated is that the fundamental underpinnings of this business, which is our platform Cloud and Managed Services remains strong. It's best evidenced by the fact that we've got cash flow and margins continue to grow, customers understand. And this indecision period, as I stated, is an opportunity for them to take a deep breath, consider their future and what do they want to do over the next 5 to 10 years as opposed to just what's in front of them. And this creates the opportunity to have a very different conversation around how do you build a higher-value business for your stakeholders, which can be members, if you're cooperative or shareholders if you're for profit. And this represents an opportunity for us to take footprint, which will then yield in 2025.
Our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux with Northland Capital Markets.
A couple of questions. And Michael, you hit on this briefly, but I want to go back to your green shoot commentary and see whether you had any more color on that. I was really -- and I had another question about revisiting the share gain efforts that were discussed on the last call. You seem to conflate those 2. And are there any other signs of positive activity throughout the customer base, small, medium or large that you would refer to or a green shoots? Or is it really your efforts to gain share?
Well, when you go back to in the pandemic, our lead times were as high as 18 months. During that situation, we had deep insight into what a BSP was doing through -- because they actually had to give us their orders, and therefore, the pipeline was affiliated with that. And over time, as we've gone through that over the last 2 years, you've seen basically lead times go down to from 6 quarters down to, in essence, a single quarter. And therefore, logically, you would also see the pipeline affiliate with that also shift. And we're now at a place where things are stabilized. And we are back to actually seeing from Green shoots point of view, significant pipeline growth, which gives us confidence in what's going to happen in second half. At the same time, we continue to take footprint as evidenced by, I talked about a larger customer selecting us with smart business. That's a significant win. That's a brand-new business. And us closing not in Q1, but in Q2, in the first 2 weeks of the quarter, we closed our biggest Cloud deal in the company's history. And so I go through those points, the pipeline growing, the strong closing the largest Cloud deal and then a larger customers selecting us to actually go after their small business market, which is, in essence, a brand-new business for us. This represents a significant opportunity and gives us confidence in the second half.
And following along from that, even what's been maybe notable here in the last couple of quarters is that even with the reins you've seen gross margins continue to tick up. I imagine there's a mix aspect of that with the appliance business. And I guess, a couple of questions, as that perhaps recovers into the second half, what impact do you expect it to have on the gross margin side, which is could it blunt that sequential growth with hardware coming back? Or do you expect to see continued steady increases in gross margin throughout the year from greater software and service revenue.
As we said throughout our platform, Cloud and Managed Services business is continuing to grow as our customers continue to take share and add new subscribers. And so you've seen that persist and will continue to do so. As new network builds come back, what you'll ultimately see as a shift in product back to more access, which has higher gross margins. So you won't see necessarily a decline in gross margins. I think you'll see the progression continue. The rate at which it changes from quarter-to-quarter will vary depending on those mixes. So for example, in the second quarter, the margin expansion is less than what it was in the first quarter. And it has to do with a lot of the products swinging back to the premises side in the second quarter. So inevitably, we think the margin will continue to progress. And I don't think you should think that will pause because a new network builds being decided.
Our next question comes from the line of Christian Schwab with Craig-Hallum Capital Group.
Cory, how long before the 2 large customers get back to $70-some million from $20 million?
I'm not going to call that one. Obviously, last quarter, I was surprised by thought they would get to where they would make some decisions. I wasn't anticipating the decline that we saw. So I'm not going to dare to go out and not in and say when that will recover back. We know it will recover at some point. I just don't know when.
So we haven't done $200 million in revenue in over 2 years. And we're going to keep spending almost 100 -- you haven't done quarterly revenue approaching $200 million in 2 years.
We did $25 million in the fourth quarter.
We did $226 in Q1.
Yes, Q1 $202 million, and this quarter, you're guiding to $200 million at the midpoint.
We haven't done $200 million goes back 2 years. I understand what you're saying, go ahead, Chris.
The point is, is your OpEx is significantly higher, right? And I know we're going to invest for growth, but we talked about a trickle of feed starting in the beginning of 25, and we have no idea what the large customers are coming back. How long do you hold this heavy OpEx on a quarterly basis?
We understand that there's $60 million new fiber line coming. We also recognize as we've identified for you that -- and you see that the fundamental business model is actually growing margin and therefore, it is strong. Customers are delaying for the very first time their decision-making, and they've got the time, as I stated, as it was so eloquently put to me last week where actually I couldn't have the time to pour coffee and now I'm willing to entertain these conversations. At this point in time, we will continue our OpEx investment because this is our opportunity to expand footprint as never before, ahead of one of the largest investments from the government in history and to do anything but what we're doing would be wrong. And with our Board, our Chairman and our leadership team, we are confident in the opportunity to grow and that's going to yield significant returns. We are investing to --
My last question is with recent expectations for 2024 and once in the generation of lifetime of BEAD and large customers who are significantly under-spending should the target growth rate for fiscal year '25 be 20% or substantially higher than that on the top line?
Possibly. That's why we're quite comfortable on '20. That's why we stated that we see this 2024 is this audit. And to your point, over the last 4 years, we've delivered 4 years of 20% growth, and we see a return to growth in 2021. And we're working that right now. We see the green shoots and all those different elements. So we're not calling 25 at this point, but we were just asked in the previous question, do we see the return to 10 and 15? Yes?
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the floor back to Mr. Fanucchi for any final comments.
Thank you, Melissa. We will participate in several investor events during the second quarter, and information about these events, including the dates and times and publicly available webcast will be posted on the Events and Presentations page of our Investor Relations section of calix.com. Once again, we want to thank everyone on this call and webcast for your interest in Calix, and for joining us, and this concludes our conference call. Have a great day.
Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.