Amerant Bancorp Inc
NYSE:AMTB
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
18.97
26.74
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q4-2023 Analysis
Amerant Bancorp Inc
The company has successfully grown its total deposits to $5.6 billion, a 6.3% increase from the previous quarter, by leveraging a well-diversified deposit mix from both domestic and international customers. Domestic deposits, which make up 69% of the total, rose by 6.7% to reach $5.4 billion, while international deposits account for the remaining 31%.
Despite some customers gravitating towards higher interest rates, the company managed to improve its Net Interest Margin (NIM) to 3.72%, reflecting a substantial quarter-over-quarter increase. The reported efficiency ratio rose dramatically to 108.3% due to nonroutine noninterest expenses, but when adjusted for these, the core efficiency stands at a healthier 69.7%. This adjustment provides a clearer view of the company's intrinsic performance.
The company's fixed income investment balance remains solid at $1.4 billion, with a shortened duration aligning with current market rate decreases. Moreover, the portfolio's market value improved by $35 million after tax, bouncing back from the previous quarter's decline. A strong focus on maintaining high credit quality provides a stable backing for the business as it goes forward.
Total gross loans have seen a modest 1.9% uptick to $7.3 billion as the company intentionally shifts towards organic growth. The loan portfolio also exhibits a resilient yield of 6.93%, excluding a one-time recovery. As part of strategic repositioning, the company sold part of its CRE loan portfolio, resulting in a targeted investment in fixed-rate earning assets to optimize returns.
Credit quality remains robust with a stable allowance for credit losses, ending the quarter at $95.5 million after accounting for new charge-offs and recoveries. Special mention loans have increased by $16.4 million due to downgrading of a few commercial loans, which merits ongoing attention for risk management purposes.
The company anticipates robust annual loan growth of around 15%, coupled with a matching rise in deposit growth. Striving for efficiency, they forecast a net interest margin between 3.50% and 3.60% for the first half of 2024, expecting improvement in the latter half. Notably, they predict higher expenses due to expansion efforts, but aim for a 60% efficiency ratio in the second half of the year. Balancing capital retention with shareholder returns through buybacks and dividends accentuates a future-focused strategy.
The company prepares for anticipated rate decreases with 52% of loans having floating rate structures and a significant portion repricing within a year. Their asset sensitivity and hedging strategies position them well for a potential downward trend in interest rates. With a substantial portion of adjustable rate loans secured with floors and indexed to current benchmarks, the balance sheet is poised to navigate interest rate cycles effectively.
Noninterest income experienced a drop to $19.6 million, largely attributed to lower mortgage banking income and other factors. Noninterest expenses at $109.7 million reflect the inclusion of $43 million in nonroutine items. The company reported a loss per share of negative $0.61 due to these exceptional items but managed a net increase in assets under management and custody by 9.4% to $2.3 billion, with expectations to continue capital management initiatives.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Greetings. Welcome to the Amerant Bancorp Fourth Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Laura Rossi, Head of Investor Relations Sustainability. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, Daryl. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us to review Amerant Bancorp's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results. On today's call are Gerald Plush, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Sharymar Yepez, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. As we begin, please note that discussions on today's call contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, references will also be made to non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the company's earnings release for a statement regarding forward-looking statements as well as for information and reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP measures. I will now turn it over to our Chairman and CEO, Gerald Plush.
Thank you, Laura. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining today's call. Today, we will cover our performance for the fourth quarter and full year. But before we do this, I would like to acknowledge and thank all of my Amerant colleagues for their dedication and effort this quarter as we completed our conversion to new core systems. This project, which required a significant amount of planning and effort was a huge undertaking and the team was up to the challenge. Please know that work continues in a number of areas post-conversion as more enhancements are on the way. So moving on to what we will cover on today's call. There are clearly a significant number of items to touch on, including the commercial real estate sale and a number of additional actions we took this quarter to best position our company for 2024, given an expected decline in interest rates. For reference, we filed a Form 8-K covering these on January 16, 2024, but it's important to give some additional context on today's call, which we will do. While these actions created additional nonroutine gains or charges this quarter, we expect this to be behind us for 2024 and as I mentioned, best position us to execute on our growth strategy. I also want to note here that we will cover credit in detail, and we've added a number of new slides to the presentation with more detail on credit components, which Shary will be covering shortly. So we'll turn now to cover Slide 3, and here we've outlined a number of key items that took place in the fourth quarter. First, deposits grew by $326 million, reflective of our deposits first organic relationship-based approach, while total loans grew $132 million. As previously reported, we made the decision to reclassify $401 million of Houston-based multifamily loans as held for sale, and we recorded a non-cash charge of $30 million before taxes in the fourth quarter. This sale is expected to be completed sometime this month. As $370 million of these loans were variable rate and at an average yield of 6.7%, this sale protects the company in a projected declining rate environment. Also, this strategic asset liability move, together with our projected increase in earning assets, is expected to create a net positive on margin after the first quarter as we plan to use the proceeds of the transaction to reduce higher-cost nonrelationship institutional deposits at an average cost of 5.6%. Finally, this repositioning also reduces CRE exposure. It's important to note that this sale also rightsizes our operations in Houston, where loans prior to the sale exceeded deposits. So we'll turn now to New York. And here, we reduced higher-risk assets as we completed the sale of the highest New York City CRE exposure, and we exited the nonperforming loan relationship in New York City we discussed on our third quarter call, and it's all part of our strategy to exit the remaining New York City loan portfolio. Speaking of the portfolio, what remains is performing and totals $217 million and consists of 21 properties and 12 relationships. We do have one small credit, which is under $2.5 million that is being watched. We repaid $585 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances, recording a $6.5 million gain for the early repayment and the replacement funding provides for a lower cost of funds going forward. We rationalized certain organizational components such as acquiring the remaining ownership interest in Amerant Mortgage and rightsized staffing given the current rate environment. And we approved the plan for the dissolution of the Landbank & Trust, our Cayman subsidiary. We wrote off goodwill from $1 million related to the mortgage company and $700,000 in goodwill intangibles related to Alan with expected annualized savings of $300,000 from closing Elant. We also rationalized headcount across multiple units, resulting in expected annual savings of $1 million after having recruited severance expenses of $1 million. And as noted, we completed the core system conversion and we're actively managing post-conversion items. We recorded $1.6 million in final conversion costs related to FIS and software expenses in the fourth quarter of '23. We also restructured bank on life insurance to include more current team members in the plan and to provide for an enhanced yield going forward with an earn-back period of approximately 2 years. This resulted in income tax expenses and other charges totaling $4.6 million. I'll now provide a brief overview of our financial position in the fourth quarter and year, and then turn it to Shary to go over the details. She'll then turn it back to me for some comments regarding 2024 as part of my closing remarks. So let's turn to Slide 4 now for financial highlights for the fourth quarter. Looking at the income statement, diluted loss per share for the fourth quarter was $0.51. This is primarily due to the net impact of those non-routine items we recorded during the period that I just covered. The net interest margin increased to 3.72% from 3.57% in the third quarter, which includes interest collected along with a loan principal recovery, which Shary will go into further detail in a few minutes. Exclusive of this recovery, we would have been relatively even with the third quarter. Although we, like others, continue to experience the challenges of a sustained high-interest rate environment along with market competition, and as a result of the higher cost of funds, this quarter, we reached an inflection point in margin compression. Credit quality events continue to be an area of focus and reserve levels are carefully monitored to provide sufficient coverage. Our provision for credit losses was $12.5 million, up $4.5 million from the $8 million in the third quarter. And again, as I mentioned, Shary will be covering the credit components in detail shortly. Noninterest income was $19.6 million, down from $21.9 million in the third quarter, while noninterest expense was $109.7 million, up $45.3 million from the third quarter. Both noninterest income and noninterest expense contained nonroutine items this quarter that I've already commented on. Total assets reached a record high of $9.7 billion, up from $9.3 billion as of the close of the third quarter. Total deposits also increased to $7.9 billion compared to $7.5 million in the third quarter. While total loans increased $132 million, gross loans held for investments actually decreased to $6.9 million from the $7.1 billion in 3Q. Our total securities portfolio was $1.5 million, and that's up $183 million from the third quarter, while cash and cash equivalents increased $12 million to $321 million at the end of the fourth quarter. The additional securities purchased were fixed rates, and they were all part of our ALM actions given an expected decline in rates in 2024. And moving on now to capital. Our total capital ratio as of 4Q ended at 12.19% compared to 12.7% as of 3Q, and our CET1 was 9.84% compared to 10.3%. Our tangible equity ratio was 7.33%, which includes $70.8 million in AOCI resulting from the after-tax change in the valuation of our AFS investment portfolio and which substantially improved in the fourth quarter from $97 million that we saw in the third quarter of '23. Lastly, as of fourth quarter, our Tier 1 capital ratio was 10.6% compared to 11.08% as of 3Q. And it's also worthy to note that on January 17, our Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.09 per share payable on February 29, 2024. So we'll move now to Slide 5, and I'll provide an overview regarding our deposit base. As I mentioned earlier, total deposits at the end of the fourth quarter were $7.9 billion, up $326 million from the third quarter. This increase was mainly driven by an increase in relationship deposits of $365 million, while institutional deposits declined by $40 million. Speaking of institutional deposits, as I briefly mentioned earlier, we anticipate the balance of this higher cost nonrelationship source of funds to be run off by mid-first quarter 2024. Our ratio of loans and deposits decreased this quarter to 92.4%. As we've referenced in prior calls, our goal is to manage it to a target of 95% and not to exceed 100%. We have a strong loan pipeline in the first quarter, so we expect to be back in this range soon. We'll turn now to Slide 6, and here we show a well-diversified deposit mix composed of domestic and international customers. Our domestic deposits account for 69% of total deposits totaling $5.4 billion as of the end of the fourth quarter. That's up $340 million or 6.7% compared to the third quarter, and international deposits, which now account for 31% of total deposits totaled $2.5 million, down slightly, 0.6% compared to the third quarter. Domestic deposit accounts have an average balance of 110,000, while international deposit accounts have an average balance of $43,000, and that reflects the granularity of our deposit base and the stability of this funding source. As I've shared in previous calls, we intend to take advantage of our infrastructure and capabilities and begin to further emphasize international deposit gathering going forward as a source of funds given favorable pricing while continuing to add diversification to our funding base. Our core deposits, defined as total deposits, excluding all-time total deposits, excluding all-time deposits, excuse me, were $5.6 billion as of the end of the fourth quarter, an increase of $332 million or 6.3% compared to the third quarter. Included in core deposits are $1.4 billion in noninterest-bearing demand, up $35 million or 2.5% versus the third quarter, $2.6 billion in interest-bearing deposits, up $144 million or 6% versus the third quarter, and that's primarily the result of continued customer demand for higher rate products and $1.6 million in savings and money market deposits, up $153 million or 10.5% versus the third quarter. So at this point, I'm going to turn things over to Shary she'll go over key metrics, some other balance sheet items, credit quality, and the results in the third quarter in more detail.
Thank you, Gerry, and good morning, everyone. As part of today's presentation, I will share more color on our financial position and performance. So turning to Slide 7, I'll begin by discussing our key metrics for the quarter. Noninterest-bearing deposits to total deposits decreased to 17.8% from 18.2%. Despite the challenges of customers seeking higher interest rates and the market competition, we continue to work hard on our deposits first focus and increasing demand deposit accounts by building relationships in our markets. While the ratio slightly decreased, total noninterest-bearing balance, in fact, increased, although not at the same speed of interest-bearing deposits. Net interest margin improved to 3.72% compared to 3.57% in the third quarter. This includes 16 basis points in connection with a one-time loan recovery. We will cover details of name changes quarter-over-quarter shortly. Our efficiency ratio was 108.3% compared to 64.1% in the third quarter as a result of the $43 million in nonroutine noninterest expense items Jerry just covered. ROA and ROE in the fourth quarter were at negative 0.71% and negative 9.22%, respectively, as a result of the one-time charges and higher provision for credit losses during the period. For consistency and transparency, we show the 3 core metrics of ROA, ROE, and operating efficiency, excluding nonroutine items, so you can better see our underlying performance for the fourth quarter. As an example, core efficiency for the fourth quarter was 69.7% compared to 62.1% in the third quarter, which excludes nonroutine charges. As I mentioned last quarter, these results also include certain costs of new applications and services being used in parallel after the conversion with previous applications in place. This parallel use of applications will occur until we complete the commission applications in the first quarter of 2024 and therefore, reduce these costs. Moving on to Slide 8, I'll discuss our investment portfolio. Our fourth quarter fixed income investment balance was $1.4 billion, slightly up from both the third quarter and the same period from last year. When compared to the prior quarter, the duration of the investment portfolio decreased to 5 years due to market rates decreasing during the quarter. We added a new chart to show the expected repayments and maturities of our investment portfolio for 2024, which represents the liquidity available to support growth and higher interest-earning assets. Moving on to the rate composition of our portfolio, you can see that the floating portion decreased to 13% compared to 15% in the third quarter. This reflects our efforts to position the balance sheet for a decreasing rate environment and achieve the right balance between yield and duration while maintaining a high credit quality of the portfolio. As we have done in previous quarters, I would like to reference the impact of the interest rates on the valuation of debt securities available for sale. As of the end of the fourth quarter, the market value of this portfolio had improved $35 million after-tax compared to the decrease of $19 million in the third quarter. The quarter-over-quarter improvement was primarily driven by market rate move and is consistent with our interest rate sensitivity analysis for down 100 basis point shock. We had an increase of $9.4 million after tax for the full year of 2023. It is also important to comment that our tangible common equity ratio ended at a solid 7.3% after considering the impact of changes in valuation of our AFS portfolio. Note that 82% of the total portfolio has a government guarantee, while the remainder is rated investment grade. Continuing on to Slide 9, let's talk about our loan portfolio. At the end of the first quarter, total gross loans were $7.3 billion, up 1.9% compared to the end of the third quarter. The increases were primarily driven by increases in single-family residential loans, land development, commercial loans as well as construction loans. Consumer loans as of the end of 4Q '23 were $403 million, a decrease of $36 million or 8.2% quarter-over-quarter. This includes $211 million in higher-yielding indirect consumer loans compared to $255 million in the third quarter, which were a peptic move for us to increase yields in prior periods. As we mentioned last quarter, we are focusing on organic growth and have not been purchasing any new production since the end of 2022. We estimate that at the current prepayment speed, this portfolio will run off by the first quarter of 2026. As Gerry mentioned, during the fourth quarter, we completed the sale of the highest CRE closure and exited the nonperforming loan relationships both in New York as part of the company's strategy to exit its remaining New York City loan portfolio. The CRE loan sale reported in a loss on sale of approximately $2 million in 4Q '23 and the nonperforming loan was modified and paid off. Our loan portfolio had a yield of 7.9% in 4Q '23. This includes the loan recovery recorded during the period. To provide a more comparable figure, the yield of the loan portfolio, excluding this recovery was 6.93%. Moving on to Slide 10. Here, we show our theory portfolio in further detail. We have a conservative weighted average loan-to-value of 58% and debt service coverage of 1.3x as well as a strong sponsorship tier profile based on AUM, network, and years of experience for each sponsor. As of the end of 4Q '23, we had 31% of our CRE portfolio and top-tier borrowers. We have no significant tenant concentration in our CRE retail loan portfolio as the top 15 tenants represent 22% of the total. Major tenants include recognized national and regional grocery stores, pharmacy, food and clothing retailers, and banks. Our underwriting methodology for CRE includes sensitivity analysis for multiple risk factors like interest rates and their impact over debt service coverage ratio, vacancy, and tenant retention. As Gerry mentioned, during the fourth quarter, we classified $401 million of our multifamily loans in Houston as held pursue. The transaction is expected to close later this month and had an impact to tangible common equity of a reduction of approximately 23 basis points on day 1 and to common equity Tier 1 of an improvement by approximately 12 basis points. With the proceeds of the sale, we expect to reduce in 124 higher-cost nonrelationship institutional funding of $260 million at an average rate of 5.6% and invest the remaining proceeds in fixed-rate earning assets. Now turning to Slide 11. Let's take a closer look at credit quality. Overall, credit quality remains sound and reserve coverage is strong despite charge-offs reported during the quarter. Nonperforming assets totaled $54.6 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2023, an increase of $1.2 million compared to the third quarter and an increase of $17 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2022. The increase in the fourth quarter was primarily due to downgrades to nonaccrual of 2 commercial Texas loans totaling $12.3 million, with $4.1 million in allocated reserves, and 1 commercial Florida loan totaling $7 million with $3.9 million in allocated reserves, offset by the exit of the series loan totaling $23.3 million with an associated charge-off of $10.3 million, of which $8.5 million was in specific reserves in previous quarters. The ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets was 56 basis points, down 1 basis point from the third quarter of 2023 and up 15 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2022. Our nonperforming loans to total loans are 47 basis points compared to 46 basis points in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2023, the coverage ratio of loan reserves to nonperforming loans closed at 3x, consistent with 3x at the end of the third quarter, an increase from 2x at the close of the fourth quarter of 2022. Now moving on to Slide 12, which is a new slide we added this quarter to better show the drivers of the allowance for credit losses. At the end of the fourth quarter, the allowance was $95.5 million, a decrease of $3.3 million or 3.3% compared to $98.8 million at the close of the third quarter. The drivers of the allowance movement this quarter were $20.6 million in charge-offs, out of which $12.1 million are incremental charges in the quarter and are primarily related to the indirect consumer portfolio, the exit of the New York City nonperforming loan, and some smaller balance business loans and $4.5 million released due to the transfer of the Houston multifamily loans to held for sale. These are offset by $2.6 million related to credit quality and macroeconomic factor update, $1.8 million due to net loan growth, and $5.3 million in recoveries, primarily related to a commercial LATAM loan that was charged off back in 2017. We recorded a provision for credit losses of $12.5 million in the fourth quarter compared to an $8 million provision in the third quarter. The provision included $0.5 million for reserves for contingency. Slide 13 is also new and provides a closer look on this topic to illustrate what the incremental charges in the quarter were, excluding previously reserved items. In that line, the $20.6 million in charge-offs included $10.3 million from the CRE New York nonperforming loans that we exited in 4Q, for which we had recorded specific reserves of $8.5 million in 3Q. Therefore, the impact for this quarter was only $1.8 million in additional provision expenses related to this loan. Additionally, we charged off $7 million related to the indirect purchase consumer loans and $3.3 million due to multiple smaller balance banking loans. The impact to provision due to these incremental charge-offs was $12.1 million this quarter. We introduced Slide 14 this quarter to provide more color regarding criticized loans. Special mention loans increased by $16.4 million or 55.8%. The increase is primarily due to 5 commercial loans totaling $34.8 million downgraded to special mention during the quarter. Consisting of one commercial Florida ABL loan totaling $18.7 million, 3 owner-occupied loans totaling $13 million, and 1 commercial Texas unsecured loan totaling $3.1 million. The increases were offset by 2 commercial loans totaling $17 million that were further downgraded to nonaccrual during the quarter as mentioned in the previous NPL discussion.Next, I'll discuss net interest income and net interest margin on Slide 15. Net interest income for the fourth quarter was $81.7 million, up 4% quarter-over-quarter and down 0.6% year-over-year. The quarter-over-quarter increase was primarily attributed to higher average rates on total interest-earning assets primarily loans, increased average loan balances, and lower average balance in official advances. The increase in net interest income was partially offset by higher average balances and rates in market deposits and customer CDs as well as lower average balances and deposits with banks, given there were no market rate increases during the quarter, there is no beta population for this period. However, we observed a beta of approximately 47 basis points on a cumulative basis since the beginning of the interest rate of CIF as a result of the combined effect of rate increases and transactional deposits, repricing of time deposits that had not repriced at higher rates as well as higher balances in deposits at higher market rates. Moving on to the net interest margin. We added Slide 16 this quarter to show the contribution to NIM from each of its components. As Jerry mentioned, NIM for the fourth quarter was 3.72%, up by 15 basis points quarter-over-quarter. The change in the NIM was primarily driven by the increase in the yield of our loan portfolio, which is now at 7.09%, an increase of 32 basis points compared to the third quarter. Interest income for 4Q '23 includes $3.6 million in connection with the loan recovery previously short-shock, as I mentioned earlier. Excluding the positive impact of this loan, the NIM would be at 3.56%, which is stable when compared with the 3Q '23 NIM at 3.67%. The number reflects the higher yield of our earning assets, offset by the higher cost of funds. We expect the margin to be stable through the second quarter, more on NIM in my closing remarks. Moving on to interest rate sensitivity on Slide 17. You can see the asset sensitivity of our balance sheet with 52% of our loans having floating rate structures and 56% repricing within a year. We also continue to execute ALM strategies, including hedging interest rate risk as we expect a downward trend in interest rates starting in 2024. As we have said in previous calls, we continue to position our portfolio for a change in rate cycle by incorporating rate floors when originating adjustable loans. We currently have 49% of our adjustable loan portfolio explore rates. Additionally, you can see here that within the variable rate loans, 36% are indexed to SOFR. Our net interest income sensitivity profile remained stable compared to the third quarter. We also include the sensitivity of our AFS portfolio to showcase our positioning to benefit from a rate-down scenario.As I've done in the past calls, during this interest rate cycle, I would like to mention the change in this case, the improvement in ALCL, following expectations for easing monetary policy in 2024. We will continue to actively manage our balance sheet to best position our bank for success in 2024 and beyond. Continuing to Slide 18. Noninterest income in the fourth quarter was $19.6 million, a decrease of $2.3 million from the third quarter, primarily due to lower mortgage banking income, reduction adjustment of $0.7 million in connection with the enhancement of BOLI during the quarter, lower fees on customer deposits in the fourth quarter in connection with the FIS conversion, lower gains on the early termination of FHLB advances and lower loan level derivative income due to less new swap contracts during the quarter. Offsetting the decrease in noninterest income were higher cards and trade financing, trade finance servicing fees. We consider $5.7 million of our noninterest income as nonrecurring items, a decrease compared to $6.9 million in the third quarter. Core noninterest income was $14 million in the fourth quarter compared to $15 million in the third quarter. Amerant's assets under management and custody totaled $2.3 billion as of the end of the fourth quarter, up $197 million or 9.4% from the end of the third quarter. This increase was primarily driven by increased market valuations following the market rally we saw in the fourth quarter. Turning to Slide 19. Fourth quarter noninterest expense was $109.7 million, up $45 million or 70% from the third quarter and up $47 million year-over-year. We consider $43 million of our expenses this quarter as nonroutine expense items, as previously mentioned. The quarter-over-quarter increase was primarily due to the following: previously discussed charge in connection to the transfer of the Houston Peri loan portfolio from investments to loans held for sale. Higher professional fees at fourth quarter expenses included the recurring expenses for FIS for the full quarter, whereas 3Q 23 only included expenses for a portion of September. Higher salaries and severance expenses driven by restructuring of business lines and other restructuring activities. Goodwill impairment due to the consolidation of MRAM mortgage and dissolution plan of Velan Bank and Trust in Hemen as well as other expenses in connection with the Bulliestructure. The increase in noninterest expense was partially offset by lower occupancy and equipment expenses since there were no expenses associated with fresh closures during the quarter. In terms of our team, we ended the quarter with 682 FTEs out of which 65 are in AMR mortgage, lower from the 700 we had in the third quarter following strategic reductions in headcount across multiple units. Moving on to Slide 20. We reported fourth quarter diluted loss per share of negative $0.61 on a net loss of $17.1 million. We recorded an income tax benefit, which impacted our diluted EPS favorably. As we have mentioned earlier, noninterest expense was higher during the first quarter, which resulted to the significant net impact of non-retin items on EPS. I'll now give some color overall outlook for the first quarter of 2024 and 2024 overall. So in summary, on the next slide, we would say the following regarding financial expectations. We expect annual loan growth of approximately 15%. Our projected annual deposit growth will match loan growth. We intend to focus on improving the ratio of noninterest-bearing to total deposits. Having our new treasury management platform and new digital account opening tools should help in this regard. Our loan-to-deposit target will remain at 95%. The net interest margin is expected to be stable compared to the normalized 4Q '23 results at the $3.50 to $3.60 level in the first half of 2024 and improved over the second half of the year. We expect higher expenses in the first half of 2024, given investment in continued expansion, projecting to achieve 60% efficiency in the second half of 2024 as we grow. We intend to continue executing on prudent capital management, balancing between retaining capital for growth and buybacks and dividends to enhance returns. And with that, I pass it back to Jerry for 2024 overview and closing remarks.
Thanks, Shary. So on our last slide today, I'm going to give some comments on how we see 2024. So starting off, we view this year as very significant as we transition from what has been a multiyear transformation phase over to execution and profitable growth. With the FIS conversion and much of the physical infrastructure changes nearly complete, along with the executive leadership team now in place, this allows for our primary focus to be all about execution.The first 2 quarters of 2024 will reflect increased investment in business development personnel to drive incremental growth in both the commercial and consumer banks. There are considerable opportunities for solid relationship growth in the markets we serve, and we're seeing a lot of interest from quality people wanting to join our team. The first half of 2024 will also reflect the incremental expense post-conversion as we decommissioned from previous systems. And now the asset shifts from the conversion to accelerating our digital transformation efforts, we have a great team on board driving our efforts, and the utilization of AI as part of this will be something we'll update everyone on throughout the year. We are focused on improved sales efficiencies as well as front and back-office efficiencies as our top priorities. And as far as an update on physical distribution, we're finally opening our new locations in downtown Miami, Fort Lauderdale, and Tampa in the first quarter of 2024, and also our new regional offices in Tampa implantation. So now we'll shift and talk a little bit about the second half of 2024. We expect to show the growth and profitability that results from the execution of our plan. And in closing, we're reaffirming our commitment to be the bank of choice in the markets we serve. We have been retooling and building for some time to have something very special here, and we believe this is our year to show how it all comes together. So with that, I'll stop, and Shary and I will look to answer any questions you have. Gary, please open the line for Q&A.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first questions come from the line of Michael Rose with Raymond James.
Maybe we could just start with the loan sale in Houston. I think when it was announced, it was a pretty large percentage of what was there. And just given what we've seen you do in New York in terms of kind of pulling out of that market, I just wanted to get a sense for what the strategy for Texas is. Is this a market that you're going to look to continue to be in? Or is the focus going to be to just focus on core South Florida operations at this point? Would just love some overarching thoughts.
Yes. So Michael, we emphasized that this portfolio of loans were really sort of -- we'll call it noncore. They were not broad relationship-based. We don't have full relationships with the sponsors the remaining portfolio that we do have associated with Houston is. And we believe that that's solid and it makes sense for us in terms of the operations there. I would also make the remark that I covered earlier, again, that we felt that Houston was in terms of loans versus deposits, not really self-funding. And we think this gets us much closer to rightsizing the operations there. Look, we have great opportunities, we think, in all of the markets we serve. Clearly, we get far more brand recognition right now because of all the steps we've taken in South Florida. But that doesn't mean that we're not looking at opportunities across the entire footprint.
That's helpful. And then maybe for Shary, just kind of a modeling question. Certainly, a lot of moving parts on the expense side, and I appreciate the color in the slides to get down to closer to a 60% efficiency ratio by year-end. But can you just help us from a run rate perspective in the first quarter, just given that there was so many moving parts, what we should kind of be using as a base? And just given that you guys have some additional investments, it looks like in the first half of the year, how should we think about at least expenses over the next quarter or 2?
Sure. So what we're seeing in terms of forecast for 2024 is that we should be, I would say, either stable or even slightly higher, closer to the 68% in the first few quarters of the year. And this is driven -- you're going to see some drop-off of some technology costs or every composition of the expenses and higher investments on the people side as we work towards growth later on in the year. So I think using a 67% to 69% should be a good range for expectations in the first half of the year.
Okay. Very helpful. And then maybe just finally for me, just Jerry, stepping back, I mean you guys have done a lot over the past couple of years really since you kind of took the reins. Are we done with the majority of the large moves in A, could we start to see some cleaner results once we get past the first couple of quarters of the year? And I think when I put the pieces together, just given what is shaping up to be your expectations are for pretty strong balance sheet growth this year, both loans, deposits, it looks like you're going to have a fair amount of positive operating leverage beginning as we get into the back half of this year and really into 2025. So just wanted to comment where you think you are with those efforts. And then it looks like you should be able to get the efficiency ratio kind of sub-60% driving ROA above 1% and drive pretty good kind of returns. Not asking for explicit guidance, but it does seem like the path forward here, especially once we get into 2025 is pretty powerful from an earnings perspective, and just wanted to get some color and thoughts from you.
Yes. No. Thank you, Michael. I would respond by saying, again, we have the right executive leadership in place. We've got the physical distribution, the vast majority. Yes, we'll do some additions here and there, but it won't be anywhere near as significant in terms of the amount of different retail facilities and regional hubs that just went over. Also having the conversion behind us. I think it's safe to say that in terms of trying to shake out, is there anything else on the nonroutine side, we certainly believe that our best days are ahead. It's going to be all about executing our plan. We think we've got the right people. We think we're adding even more quality people and that's all going to drive incremental growth and profitability. So we're excited. I think that it's been quite a journey here, and I do think it's important to say that we really do believe out of this transformation phase, we've got to go full steam ahead on our growth and just execute.
Our next questions come from the line of Feddie Strickland with Janney Montgomery Scott.
Just wanted to step back to the expense discussion again real quick. Just trying to understand in the second half of the year as we get to that 60% of efficiency. Is part of that -- I guess, are expenses flat from the second quarter? Or do they come back down just as some of these dual systems turn the single systems? I guess my question is, does it go back towards like a $60 million level? Or do they just stay relatively flat in the back half of the year?
Yes. And we do expect that in the second half of the year, expenses will stay pretty flat to what we're seeing earlier in the year. I think what you're going to see in terms of the improvement on the efficiency ratio will be driven by the growth component.
Got it. So it will be on the revenue side. That makes sense. And then moving over to the charge-off piece. I think I heard you say that most of that this quarter was driven by the movement in the New York portfolio, getting that on NPL out of there. Does that mean we should expect charge-offs to kind of step down a bit from here and be primarily driven by that consumer portfolio? And then any other one-off items that might come up in the next couple of quarters?
Yes. From a charge perspective, you're right. The drivers of the charge-off this quarter were the near nonperforming loan, and we also had some charge-offs related to the indirect consumer portfolio. We are not expecting a similar level of charge-offs coming from the New York portfolio in the next quarters.
Yes. And to add to that, that's why I gave those comments around the $27 million that's left. The portfolio is 21 properties, 12 sponsors. It's all performing. We've got a small credit that we've got on our watch list based on payment history. But I would tell you that in terms of the size issues, some of the issues that we've had, we've got it already either in NPA, because that's the one big REO that we still have, which, by the way, just making a comment. We're making a lot of progress there. We did get the permits to be able to open the accessibility on that one. I just think we're in a little better place as it relates to what's going to happen there and being able to get that thing moved, hopefully here in 2024.
That's helpful. One last thing. I just want to make sure I heard the NIM guide correct. I know it says flat in the first half of the year and the 2024 outlook. But I think I heard you say that, that was going to step back down actually to the $3.50 to $3.60 range because of that loan recovery piece. Did I write that down correctly?
Yes. We are expecting to stay within the 350 and 360 range in the first half of the year.
Yes. Ted, we think we hit the inflection point, right? I think if you now look at which originally we were thinking wouldn't come until 2024. We obviously, with a bunch of different moves we've made, got there quicker. And that's actually one of the real positives out of the fourth quarter.
Our next questions come from the line of Russell Gunther with Stephens.
Just a quick follow-up on the margin discussion. Can you guys share what your interest rate assumptions are that are underlying that guide?
So from a NIM perspective, what we're expecting, at least in the first half of the year is for the loan portfolio to stay pretty flat or loan production that's coming on to the portfolio to be in the higher end. And from the expense standpoint, we're seeing that the overall -- we got to the point where pretty much everything has reset to the current rate level. So we're expecting cost of funds to stay pretty flat. What you're going to see, Russell, is that in the first quarter, we have a timing component. We have a timing component related to the reallocation of the funds that come from the multifamily portfolio. So some of those will be placed in liquid assets as we're able to redeploy them into the loan portfolio, which will be able to take us to the higher end of the range that we provided guidance on by the end of the second quarter.
Okay. And then I guess, in terms of your expectations for Fed rate cuts or staying stable, just what is baked into the margin guide for '24?
For the first half of the year, we have rates pretty stable. We are incorporating some rate cuts in the second half of the year. We have modeled from haircut some rates, sorry, through the end of the fourth quarter.
So the margin guide includes 6 Fed rate cuts?
What Sherry has given you, Russell, is we've looked at a sensitivity of none to up to that many. Our projection is that there'll be several in the second half of the year.
But the guidance that was shared was through the end of the second quarter, for which our assumption is no cut.
Correct. Yes. Okay. Understood. I guess I would ask then on the beta assumption. So cumulative 47% on the way up. How do you expect that to trend on the way down as you guys are thinking about those 3 cuts in the back half of the year?
Right. So if we think about our current portfolio and we think about, let's say, your average maturities on customer deposits, and we think about our interest-bearing products resetting faster. We should be thinking with a cut of 25 basis points. We're thinking of a beta closer to 40%.
That's great, Jerry. And then just switching gears, final question for me, guys. The really strong expectations. Just any color you could share in terms of loan mix drivers, and then I think, Sary in your expense comments, you mentioned additional cost around hiring folks, if that is related to any loan growth expectations as well.
Yes. Look, I think on both sides of -- as I said, I've referred to it as consumer and corporate, and in our consumer, it's predominantly additions we'll continue to make in private banking. We have an already strong team that's done a great job, and we believe -- and as I mentioned, we have a lot of people that have a strong interest in working with us. I think the reputation of building through even with some of the ups and downs we've had in the financial results, the underlying performance of the company, the growth trajectory, people, all the branding we've been doing, seeing us in the community, we had a lot of people that have a strong interest in being part of our team. The same thing is true on the corporate side. We've added some great folks to an already good team. I mean, a very solid team for sure, and we are getting strong interest there. So it's a combination of -- remember, last year, we built throughout the year, and now you're going to layer even more personnel in. And basically, to put more folks in markets where we think there's great opportunities where we've got strong presence already throughout Miami-Dade. We know that we can add incrementally to a great team we've got in Broward and to build even further in Palm Beach, right? So just here alone in South Florida. And as we've talked about, we put a new regional headquarters that will be opening. We also have the new Tampa, our first facility, branch facility going in there. There's going to be additional there as well. So we just see -- we're taking advantage of a lot of market recognition and a lot of people talking about us to add quality folks in both sides.
Our next questions come from the line of Will Jones with KBW.
I just wanted to stick on the growth discussion for a second, Jerry, the outlook really is strong, particularly on the deposit side. I know a lot of your peers would be really able to grow deposits at that pace. But what do you have to pay on new deposits to attract that kind of growth in this upcoming year?
Yes. No, I don't know that it's as much to pay on the deposits. It's asking for the business. I think this is a shift, a cultural shift in our company where we've really emphasized -- I've been talking about it from the previous quarters about deposits first is job one. And I just think asking for the business, right? We had been very siloed in approach years ago and the change culturally in the company, it's coming through in the numbers. I actually think Shary made a great observation in her comments that we've almost got an incredible opportunity, not almost. We have an incredible opportunity because of the new treasury management platform, coupled with a much smoother account opening process on the consumer private bank side, where it's only a couple of steps. I'm really excited to see the change, I think we can make in noninterest growth where as opposed to it having to be, hey, we're growing because we're out issuing time deposits or high-rate money market.
Yes. No, that makes total sense. And are you seeing any green shoots in the international deposit base? I know you guys have been really excited about maybe trying to see an inflection point and the growth of deposits there. Is any of the guidance factoring growth in that international deposit base?
It's an area where we -- I'll call it, the strategy is evolving. We think we've got the right marketing, the right intel that we're developing, and we're going to give you guys as we come into, I'll call it, conference season, probably more and more from the investor presentations, more details on how that's evolving. So I would tell you, it's an area where the team is working hard. They are definitely getting new business. We have some areas where we want to sort of, I'll call it, fine-tune and focus on. And so that's one where I would say maybe by mid-February later first quarter, we'll be able to give even more color about how that's going to play out for 2024.
Yes. Okay. That's great. And then last one for me. This is maybe more technical. I think I might have an answer in the slides, but with the multifamily loan sale within that $30 million charge you guys took I'm assuming that was mostly not all rate related was there a credit-related piece to the -- that you may have charged off with the loan sale? Or could you just kind of give us some break...
Yes. No, well, they were all performing. They were all high quality. There's low loan to values on those, no issues on those properties.
Yes. Okay. Any other larger pieces of the portfolio that you may look to do with a similar strategy or it was just really just kind of a one-time opportunistic...
Yes, this is definitely a one-time opportunistic evaluating. Again, I think we kind of hammer around this a lot, hammer this home that we want to be a relationship-based organization. And while there's others that may not take that same approach as us, that's one of the biggest drivers of why we identified that portfolio in particular as one that made sense for us to exit and to basically replace it with knowing the sponsors and having a much broader relationship with those sponsors.
Our next questions come from the line of Stephen Scouten with Piper Sandler.
Just first, I was curious if you had an update on the consumer balances. I don't think I saw that in the slide deck anymore of the indirect consumer. Just kind of curious where that falls and what the pace of runoff you think is from here.
Yes, around the indirect consumer? Right. Stephen, just to clarify you're talking about the interest.
Yes.
It's about $220 million. And I think as Shary commented, the expectation is based on current payment rates, it will be off the books over after the -- I guess the best way to say it is by the end of '25, maybe a little bit residual into the first quarter of '26.
Okay. And I know there was kind of a question around that book with charge-offs in a sense, but obviously, charge-offs have been elevated kind of the last couple of years. What do you think a normalized level of net charge-offs is for you guys in this kind of environment with the book you have today after kind of clearing the decks a bit from here?
Yes. If we remove these charge-offs from the indirect consumer and we look at a more normalized charge-off level, we're seeing it close to 30 basis points.
Okay. 30 bps ex the indirect consumer and then that will just kind of be peak meal over that 2 years, as that book runs off?
Yes.
Look, I think what's happening, Stephen, in that portfolio is you remember these are debt consolidation loans. It's a pretty granular portfolio. It's not concentrated in any one state. But I do think it reflects the consumer debt load and the pressure that's on the consumer. And so we're seeing that. I think one portfolio because of the different vintages is actually starting to show signs of the charge-off levels improving, I guess, I should say, declining. So we're hopeful that we'll continue to see that.
Yes. Okay. And then just kind of last question around the NIM. So it sounds like -- so we're not taking the $372 million, I guess, if we take the $3.72 minus the loan recoveries to kind of starting from and then kind of flattish from there. And then even with -- if you could just repeat what you have in there from a Fed cut perspective. But how do we think about the ability to expand NIM with the asset sensitivity there? I would have expected with it down 100 basis points, I think you showed down 3.1%. So kind of wondering how that plays out in the down rate environment that we think we might see moving forward.
Right. So going back to the first part of the question, when we think about the NIM for the first quarter of 2024, we are expecting to see a slight reduction on the average balance sheet side because we're going to use a portion of the proceeds to pay off institutional funds. That should pick up once we continue with the loan pipeline materializing, right? So that's what's going to make us go from the lower to the higher end of the range of the guidance we provided through the end of the second quarter. As we think about the NIM more prospectively and how we're managing the rate or protecting the balance sheet from a downward trend, there are a couple of things we're thinking about. So the first one is from the investment portfolio, the purchases we have made and that we're looking forward from an expectation are on fixed-rate securities, but also looking at the quality of those securities and characteristics that slowed down the level of prepayments in a typical prepayment speed environment that we would have on a downward trend. The second piece is on the loan side, and I think I mentioned something of this in my comments, it's the floor that we are using for variable rate loan production and also looking into fixed rate loan production as well. That, together with the reset of our liability side and seeing an increase in interest-bearing products versus CDs are positioning our balance sheet in a better spot for a downward trend.
Okay. That's extremely helpful. And just last thing, I guess, is the core spread you're seeing today, what are you seeing kind of on new loan production versus where new deposits are coming on? I guess as we think about this, maybe 15% loan and deposit growth next year, kind of what that core spread looks like?
I think the spread is pretty similar to what we're seeing in the fourth quarter production. I think we got to a point where the deposit side already maxed the rate level and the loan production is already at the high level as well. So I think if we're going to think about projections for the first half, I would see a pretty stable level versus the fourth quarter of 2023.
Thank you. We have reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Jerry Plush for any closing remarks.
Yes. Thank you, everyone, for joining our fourth-quarter and full-year earnings call. We're excited about the foundational progress we made throughout 2023 toward becoming a stronger, higher-performing bank. And as I noted earlier, we're now focused on executing on our strategy to show how it all comes together. Thank you again for your continued support and interest in Amerant, and have a great day.
Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.