Ameren Corp
NYSE:AEE
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
67.92
94.31
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q3-2024 Analysis
Ameren Corp
In the third quarter of 2024, Ameren reported adjusted earnings of $1.87 per share, aligning with the previous year's earnings for the same period. This stability comes despite substantial recent challenges, including charges related to regulatory actions tied to the Rush Island Energy Center and changes in allowed returns on equity by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The total impact of these regulatory charges accounted for $0.17 per share, reflecting ongoing adjustments that have strained Ameren's financials over the past decade.
The economic backdrop for Ameren remains robust, particularly in the Greater St. Louis region, which ranks highly for employment growth. Year-to-date, Ameren Missouri saw weather-normalized kilowatt-hour sales rise approximately 2% for residential customers, 1% for commercial, and 3% for industrial customers. Although sales in Illinois remained flat, the company is benefiting from full revenue decoupling that protects earnings from sales fluctuations. This strong performance in Missouri suggests a solid demand for energy, especially with ongoing infrastructure investments.
Looking ahead, Ameren has issued guidance for adjusted 2024 earnings to fall between $4.55 and $4.69 per share. Substantiating this confidence, management anticipates a further growth in 2025 earnings per share to be in the range of $4.85 to $5.05, representing about a 7.1% increase from the 2024 midpoint. This expected growth is driven by strategic infrastructure projects exceeding $55 billion over the next decade, aimed at enhancing grid reliability and supporting the growing demand.
In a bid to transition towards cleaner energy, Ameren is aggressively investing in new generation projects, including three solar energy centers with a capacity of 500 megawatts expected to come online by year’s end. Additionally, the approval of an 800-megawatt natural gas facility, Castle Bluff, will bolster grid reliability. These projects are pivotal as Ameren strives not just to meet current demand but also to anticipate future energy requirements amid evolving federal regulations.
Ameren's disciplined approach to cost control has enabled it to manage operational expenses effectively, with a focus on enhancing efficiency while keeping rates competitive. Although operating costs increased slightly year-over-year in the third quarter, the company has identified several initiatives that could lead to future reductions. These enhancements include improvements across headcount and discretionary spending, aiming for a more streamlined operation.
The regulatory landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for Ameren. The upcoming decisions from the Missouri Public Service Commission regarding new rate structures are critical as they could potentially support a significant cumulative revenue increase. This regulatory support will be crucial in funding Ameren's ambitious investment plans and ensuring that rates remain below national averages, which is a key selling point for attracting business and residential customers alike.
Ameren is also seeing substantial interest in its service territory from data centers and manufacturing sectors, which has significantly expanded over the past year. The company has already secured contracts for approximately 350 megawatts of new load, 90% of which is based in Missouri, expected to generate thousands of jobs. This pipeline of economic activity further underscores Ameren’s position as a vital utility that can facilitate growth in its regions while driving shareholder value.
Investors can expect a strong total return story from Ameren, characterized by solid earnings growth rates of 6% to 8% projected through 2028. Coupled with a current dividend yield of 3.1%, the company's strategic focus on infrastructure investment and regulatory compliance makes it an attractive investment for those seeking long-term stability and returns. With a strong balance sheet and experienced management, Ameren is poised to maximize shareholder value while adapting to changing energy needs.
Greetings, and welcome to the Ameren Corporation Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Andrew Kirk, Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Modeling for Ameren Corporation. Mr. Kirk, please proceed.
Thank you, and good morning. On the call with me today are Marty Lyons, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Michael Moehn, our Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; as well as other members of the Ameren management team.
This call contains time-sensitive data that is accurate only as of the date of today's live broadcast and redistribution of this broadcast is prohibited. We have posted a presentation on the amereninvestors.com homepage that will be referenced by our speakers.
As noted on Page 2 of the presentation, comments made during this conference call may contain statements about future expectations, plans, projections, financial performance and similar matters, which are commonly referred to as forward-looking statements. Please refer to the forward-looking statements section in the news release we issued yesterday as well as our SEC filings for more information about the various factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated.
Now here is Marty, who will start on Page 4.
Thanks, Andrew. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today as we cover our third quarter 2024 earnings results. I'll begin today on Page 4.
We focused on delivering strong long-term value for our customers, communities, shareholders and the environment. By investing in rate-regulated infrastructure, enhancing regulatory frameworks and advocating for responsible energy policies, we are positioning ourselves to take advantage of future opportunities to benefit all of our stakeholders. And through a disciplined approach to optimizing our operating performance, we have been able to keep our customer rates low in comparison to the national average as we transform the energy grid to enhance reliability and provide cleaner energy to our communities. We remain excited for the future, and we see strong growth opportunities unfolding over the next decade.
Turning to Page 5. Yesterday, we announced third quarter 2024 adjusted earnings of $1.87 per share compared to earnings of $1.87 per share in the third quarter of 2023. These comparable adjusted earnings results were in line with our expectations.
The third quarter and year-to-date 2024 adjusted results exclude 2 charges related to separate proceedings that had been ongoing for over a decade. The first, related to an agreement in principle to settle the Rush Island Energy Center New Source Review and Clean Air Act proceeding; and the second, for customer refunds required by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's, FERC's, October 2024 order, which established a new base return on equity within the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, or MISO, that was applied retroactively to certain periods extending back to 2013. Key earnings drivers are highlighted on this page. Michael will discuss the factors driving the quarterly results in more detail in a moment.
Our strong investment pipeline continues to drive earnings growth, and I'm excited about the significant economic growth opportunities in the communities we serve. The Greater St. Louis region is experiencing some of the highest employment growth we've seen in the better part of 3 decades. In August, the region was ranked fourth among large metro areas in the country for employment growth. And we're seeing the strength in our region reflected in strong weather-normalized retail sales growth year-to-date across all customer classes in Missouri.
Turning now to Page 6. Thanks to our team's execution of our strategy over the course of this year, we have a strong foundation as we head into the final months of 2024. We expect to deliver 2024 earnings within our adjusted guidance range of $4.55 per share and $4.69 per share. And we expect our 2025 earnings per share to be in the range of $4.85 and $5.05 with the midpoint representing a 7.1% increase over the midpoint of our 2024 adjusted guidance range.
Our historical practice has been to provide initial earnings guidance on our fourth quarter earnings call in February, we're issuing this 2025 guidance now to reinforce our confidence in our ability to deliver on our 6% to 8% earnings per share growth guidance expectations. We expect to provide our long-term earnings growth guidance and capital and financing plans on our year-end call in February.
On Page 7, we highlight the latest advancements across Ameren as we execute our strategic objectives for the year. Our infrastructure investment plan is designed to improve the reliability resiliency, safety and efficiency of our system as we remain focused on a reliable clean energy transition. Year-to-date, we've invested $3 billion to replace aging infrastructure and also build the new infrastructure needed to meet our customers' growing demand with a diverse mix of energy resources.
Just last week, we announced that we have now closed on 3 solar energy centers this year, totaling 500 megawatts of new generation, which are undergoing final testing and are expected to be in service by the end of the year.
On the regulatory front, MISO's long-range transmission planning process is progressing toward approval of the Tranche 2.1 portfolio by the end of the year. In September, MISO released additional Tranche 2.1 project details which included approximately $3.6 billion of transmission investment needed in our Missouri and Illinois service territories to support reliability for the region.
At Ameren Missouri, we're working to bring more dispatchable generation onto the grid. In October, the Missouri Public Service Commission, or Missouri PSC, approved a certificate of convenience and necessity, or CCN, and post-construction cost deferral for the 800-megawatt simple cycle natural gas energy center, Castle Bluff. This $900 million investment in dispatchable generation will support energy reliability in our region and will also create hundreds of construction jobs, several new permanent jobs and additional tax revenue for the region.
In addition, in November, we reached an agreement in principle with the U.S. Department of Justice to settle the Rush Island Energy Center New Source Review and Clean Air Act proceeding. I'll cover the details of the agreement in a moment.
And finally, at Ameren Illinois, in October, the Administrative Law Judge, or ALJ, issued a proposed order regarding our revised 2024 through 2027 electric distribution multiyear rate plan. Importantly, the ALJ proposed order supports 99% of our requested rate base when excluding the impacts of other post-employment benefits or OPED. Following our team's extensive engagement with key stakeholders, all interveners support the Illinois Commerce Commission, or ICC's approval of a revised grid plan with limited adjustments. We look forward [ to an ] ICC decision by the end of this year, which we expect to be consistent with the multiyear capital plans we issued in February.
Last, operational performance across our company remains strong. with a focus on delivering safer, more reliable and affordable energy through grid hardening, enhanced automation, optimization and standardization.
Turning to Page 8 for an update on Ameren Missouri's new generation projects. We continue to execute our Ameren Missouri Integrated Resource Plan, or IRP, which focuses on maintaining and building a diverse cleaner generation portfolio to ensure a reliable and low-cost mix of energy resources to serve our customers' needs. As I mentioned, we have 3 solar projects in the later stages of commissioning and testing and that are expected to be in service by the end of this year. We're also working towards the successful construction of another 400 megawatts of solar generation across 3 additional projects, which we expect will be ready to serve customers in late 2025 and 2026.
Further, as I mentioned, in October, the Missouri PSC approved a CCN for the dispatchable 800-megawatt simple cycle natural gas energy center, Castle Bluff, following a constructive settlement with the commission staff and other intervenors. The order also includes post-construction cost deferral to reduce unrecovered costs by allowing us to defer and recover the depreciation expense from the Castle Bluff Energy Center and an adjusted weighted average cost of capital return on the investment from the time it is placed in service to when it is incorporated into base rates.
As solar energy predictably rises and then falls every day, it is vital to have Castle Bluff Energy Center to bolster grid reliability for our customers. Prep work has begun on Castle Bluff, which will be located on the site of our retired Meramec Energy Center, allowing us to cost effectively expedite the construction by leveraging an existing site with infrastructure in place. The energy center is expected to be in service for our customers by the end of 2027. We look forward to continuing to work with key stakeholders to bring additional generation online as quickly as possible to meet the needs of all customers including businesses looking to relocate or expand in Missouri.
Moving now to Page 9 for an update on the MISO long-range transmission projects. In September, MISO provided additional detail and individual project cost estimates underlying the almost $22 billion Tranche 2.1 portfolio which is expected to drive significant reliability and capacity benefits for the region. The portfolio includes 3 projects in our Missouri and Illinois service territories that collectively represent an investment opportunity of approximately $3.6 billion. We await MISO's determination of which projects will be directly assigned or which will go through a competitive bidding process. MISO expects to approve the Tranche 2.1 projects by the end of this year.
Once approved, MISO plans to commence work in 2025 on the Tranche 2.2 portfolio to address further transmission needs in the North and Midwest regions. As we continue to see substantial load growth across the country, MISO and transmission owners will continue to assess whether the current long-range transmission future scenarios will be sufficient to support our region's energy needs in the years ahead.
Moving now to Page 10 for an update on our expanding customer growth opportunities. Our service territories have a broad-based diverse economy, which continues to expand across a variety of manufacturing sectors, including aerospace, agriculture and food processing, to name a few. So far this year, we've received expansion commitments or executed new contracts for approximately 350 megawatts of new load from data centers, manufacturing and other industries, 90% of which is located in Missouri. These projects are expected to create more than 2,200 jobs. We expect these new and expanding customers to be fully ramped up by 2028. We're excited about these opportunities and see tremendous additional opportunities for growth over the next 5 to 7 years, which will bring jobs and additional tax base to benefit our state and local communities.
Through ongoing collaboration with a variety of state and local stakeholders, we continue to attract new business and data center interest. Over the last few months, our economic development pipeline of potential additional demand has doubled in size and we are making meaningful progress with several potential customers. These customers representing several gigawatts of interest have completed transmission engineering studies and over the coming months, each will further evaluate the site locations and determine whether they will move forward with construction agreements.
We're pleased to offer reliable service and competitive rates as well as the people, resources, expertise and partnerships needed to deliver for these customers. The ultimate net financial impact of any incremental load will be dependent upon a variety of factors, including customer ramp-up time, additional generation or grid investments needed, timing of rate reviews and tariff structures. To that end, we are in the process of carefully evaluating potential load growth opportunities and our associated generation portfolio needs and would expect to update our IRP by February of 2025. This is an exciting time in our industry, and we look forward to finding solutions for these significant potential new customers.
Turning then to Page 11. After almost 50 years of providing cost-effective energy to our customers, our Rush Island Energy Center was safely retired on October 15. We are grateful to our coworkers who made this plan a reliable and low-cost energy source for our customers for many decades. Careful planning over several years enabled us to ensure that every employee impacted by the retirement of Rush Island had an opportunity with the company as we continue to thoughtfully transition our generation resources while retaining our talented workforce.
The Missouri PSC has authorized recovery of approximately $470 million of costs related to retirement of Rush Island through the issuance of securitized utility tariff bonds, and we are working through the next steps to execute that issuance.
In addition, in November, Ameren Missouri and the U.S. Department of Justice reached a settlement agreement in principle requiring Ameren Missouri to fund 2 [ ligation ] relief programs in addition to retiring the energy center. The cost of these programs, which will provide for the electrification of school buses over a 3-year period and air purifiers for eligible Ameren Missouri residential customers over 12 months, totaled $64 million. And the charges recorded this year related to this agreement are excluded from our adjusted earnings results. The agreement between the DOJ and Ameren Missouri is subject to approval by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, which is expected by the end of the year.
Moving to Page 12. Looking ahead over the coming decade, we have a robust pipeline of investment opportunities of more than $55 billion that will continue to deliver significant value to our stakeholders, create thousands of jobs, generate tax revenue for our local economies and support economic growth in our region. Importantly, our 10-year investment pipeline does not reflect possible additional generation as we evaluate our needs to serve potential additional load growth. Any such changes to our 10-year investment pipeline will be reflected in our February earnings call update.
Moving to Page 13. Our 5-year growth plan released last February included our expectation of a 6% to 8% compound annual earnings growth rate from 2024 through 2028. This earnings growth is driven by strong compound annual rate base growth of 8.2% and strategic allocation of infrastructure investment to each of our business segments based on their regulatory frameworks.
Investment in Ameren presents an attractive opportunity for those seeking a high-quality utility growth story. Combined, our strong long-term 6% to 8% earnings growth and an attractive and growing dividend, which today yields 3.1% result in a compelling total return story. We have a strong track record of execution, a strong balance sheet and an experienced management team. I'm confident in our ability to execute our investment plans and other elements of our strategy across all 4 of our business segments.
Again, thank you all for joining us today, and I'll now turn the call over to Michael.
Thanks, Marty, and good morning, everyone. I'll begin on Page 15 of our presentation with an earnings reconciliation for the 2 earnings adjustments that Marty mentioned earlier.
Yesterday, we reported third quarter 2024 GAAP earnings of $1.70 per share, which included a charge for additional mitigation related to the Rush Island Energy Center and a charge for the October 2024 [ first ] quarter on MISO's allowed base ROE. Both of these charges related to matters outstanding for the last decade. Excluding these 2 charges, [ Ameren ] reported third quarter adjusted earnings of $1.87 per share compared to earnings of $1.87 per share for the year ago quarter. The total after-tax charge of $0.17 per share in 2024 related to our Rush Island Energy Center reflects the estimated cost of the mitigation relief firm agreed to with the U.S. Department of Justice. This includes the $0.04 per share charge recorded in the first quarter of 2024. Subject to approval by the District Court, we expect the settlement agreement to resolve the proceeding related to the new source review provisions of the Clean Air Act.
Turning to the charge for the FERC order. Recall, since November 2013, the allowed base ROE for FERC-related transmission rate base within the MISO has been subject to review. In FERC's October [ 2024 rule ], it established a new base ROE of 9.98% for the period of November 2013 through February 2015 and September 2016 forward, which decreased the allowed base ROE from 10.02% and will require refunds with interest for these periods, pulling an after-tax impact of $0.04 per share. The return on equity from MISO projects is now 10.48%, including the 50 basis point adder, and we do not expect a 4 basis point decrease in ROE to have a material impact on earnings expectations going forward.
Turning to Page 16 for detailed earnings results for the third quarter. Our adjusted earnings performance during the quarter were driven primarily by strategic infrastructure investments and disciplined cost management. offset by changes in return on equity for Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution and rate design at Ameren Illinois Natural Gas. Additional factors that contributed to the year-over-year earnings per share results are highlighted on this page. Year-to-date results are outlined on Page 26 of today's presentation.
Before moving on, I'll touch on sales trends for Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution. While [ models are ] lower this quarter compared to the year ago period created some earnings drag, our third quarter weather-normalized retail sales remained strong at an overall increase of approximately 1.5% compared to the year ago period. Year-to-date, weather-normalized kilowatt hour sales to Missouri residential, commercial and industrial customers increased approximately 2%, 1% and 3%, respectively, compared to last year.
Year-to-date increase in industrial sales reflect production growth driven by new industrial plan additions and additional shift work in our service territory. Year-to-date weather-normalized kilowatt hour sales to Illinois customers were flat compared to last year. [ We saw the changes in electric, electric sales ] no matter the cause, do not affect earnings since we have full revenue decoupling. On Page 17, we summarized select earnings considerations for the balance of the year.
We expect our 2024 adjusted earnings to be in the range of $4.55 to $4.69 per share. Notably, we expect a positive year-over-year earnings impact in the fourth quarter, driven primarily by strategic infrastructure investments, strong cost management programs and lower shareable trust contributions compared to the year ago period. I encourage you to take [ the settlement earnings driver as ] noted on the slide into consideration as you develop your earnings expectations for the remainder of the year.
Turning to Page 18, where we provide detail on our expectations for 2025 earnings per share. As we head into 2025, we feel confident that strong execution of our strategic plan this year will position us to deliver on our expected long-term earnings growth. With that in mind, we expect 2025 earnings per share to be in the range of $4.85 and $5.05. This midpoint of this range represents a little above 7% earnings per share growth compared to the midpoint of our 2024 adjusted earnings guidance range. Expected 2025 earnings detail by segment as compared to our 2024 expectations are highlighted on this page.
Beginning with Ameren Missouri, earnings are expected to benefit from new electric service rates effective by June 2025 and higher investment eligible for plant and service accounting. Earnings are also expected to benefit from higher weather-normalized retail sales primarily to Missouri's commercial and industrial customers, which are expected to increase by 1% and 2%, respectively, driven primarily by the expansion and growth from our existing customers. We expect to update our long-term sales forecast in February.
Further, we expect higher interest expense in Ameren Missouri and Ameren Parent. Earnings in Ameren Transmission and Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution are expected to rise, driven by higher infrastructure investments. Earnings in Ameren Illinois Natural Gas are expected to be lower due to cost recovery impacts between rate reviews. In Ameren wide, we expect increased weighted average common shares outstanding to unfavorably impact earnings per share. Robust infrastructure investment and economic growth opportunities, coupled with identified business process optimization opportunities and continued strong strategic focus gives confidence in our ability to grow in 2025 and the years ahead.
Turning to Page 19 for a brief update on ambulatory regulatory matters. In August, the Missouri [ PSC is set to ] procedural schedule for our ongoing Ameren Missouri electric [ grid ] review. Intervenor testimony is due in early December, and we expect the decision by the commission by May 2025 with newer rates effective by June. Recall that approximately 90% of this request is driven by [ investments center and Missouri Smart Energy Plant ], including major upgrades the electric system and investments in generation. If approved, as requested, new electric service rates would remain well below the national and midwest averages.
Turning to Ameren Illinois regulatory matters on Page 20. Under Illinois [ formed in the ] ratemaking, which expired at the end of 2023, Ameren Illinois was required to file annual rate updates to systematically adjust cash flows over time for changes in the cost of service and to true up any prior period over or under recovery of such costs. For the final electric distribution reconciliation of 2023's revenue requirement, in August, the ICC staff recommended approval of our proposed $158 million reconciliation adjustment. The full amount will be collected from customers in 2025, replacing the prior reconciliation adjustment of $110 million that is being collected during 2024. This will result in a net increase in cash flow of $48 million or approximately 1.5% increase in total average residential customer bill. An ICC decision is expected by December with new rates effective in 2025.
Turning to Page 21 for an update on the multiyear rate plan covering 2024 through 2027. In October, the ALJ recommended a cumulative revenue increase of $315 million based on an average rate base of [ $4.9 ] billion by 2027 soon. Excluding the OPED issue, the ALJ proposed order supports 99% of the rate base that were requested in our revised multiyear rate point. This allows us to invest in the energy grid to maintain safety, reliability on the day-to-day operations of our system while also making progress towards an affordable equitable clean energy transition.
Following constructive engagement with interveners to narrow the remaining issues, the latest proposals will reflect a multiyear grid plan that is largely consistent with our guidance laid out in February. We expect an ICC decision by December with new rates effective January 1, 2025. Under the multiyear rate plan framework, annual revenues will be based on actual recoverable costs, [ year-end ] rate base and a return on equity provided they do not exceed 105% of the approved revenue requirement after certain exclusions.
Moving to Page 22. We provide a financing update. We continue to feel very good about our financial position. Our parent long-term issuer credit ratings of Baa1 and BBB+ at Moody's and S&P, respectively, compared favorably to the peer average, providing us with financial flexibility. To maintain our credit ratings and strong balance sheet while we fund our robust infrastructure plan, we expect to issue approximately $300 million of common equity in total in 2024.
By the end of 2023, we [ sold forward ] approximately $230 million of the expected $300 million through the at-the-market or ATM program, consisting of approximately 2.9 million shares, which we expect to settle by the end of this year. Together with the issuance entering our 401(k) and DRPlus programs, our ATM equity program is expected to fill our 2024 equity needs.
Additionally, as of September 30, we've entered into forward sales agreements under our ATM program for approximately $155 million to support our 2025 equity needs, with an average initial forward sales price of approximately $82 per share. As always, we continue to be thoughtful about strategically financing our robust capital.
Turning to Page 23. We remain confident in our long-term strategy, which we expect to continue to drive consistent superior value for all of our stakeholders. As highlighted today, we have made significant progress towards resolving several regulatory and legal proceedings. We have strong infrastructure investment opportunities to benefit our customers and attract new businesses, and we continue to see signs of an attractive regional economy, including solid retail sales growth, strong employment growth in the St. Louis region, moderating interest rates and inflation and a robust economic development pipeline that will allow us to deliver strong earnings growth in 2025.
Looking beyond, we expect consistent strong earnings share growth driven by robust rate base growth disciplined cost management and a robust customer [ growth line of sight ]. As we said before, we have the right strategy, team and culture to capitalize on opportunities to create value for our customers and shareholders. We believe this growth will compare favorably with the growth of our peers, and shares continue to offer investors an attractive dividend. In [ total ], we have an attractive total shareholder return story.
That concludes our prepared remarks. We now invite your questions.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Jeremy Tonet with JPMorgan.
This is Robin on for Jeremy. So maybe just a follow up. You mentioned providing 2025 guidance at 3Q to understood your confidence in your earnings trajectory. Could you elaborate on that strategy amid several ongoing regulatory proceedings? And specifically, how should we think about the 2025 range relative to potential regulatory outcomes?
Yes, sure. Well, first of all, as you look back on some of the comments we made at the second quarter, we have a long history of growing at 7% or above. Our goal, as we go into this year, of course, is to deliver at the midpoint or even higher within our range. And some things that we pointed to last quarter that are just giving us more long-term conviction have to do with inflation cooling, strong local economy, demand improving, some of the things we've talked about even on this call with respect to customer growth opportunities and great investments that we've got across all of our operations, whether it's distribution, transmission and generation, of course, a strong balance sheet.
So we have strong conviction in our ability to grow long term. And as we look at 2025, we certainly have confidence in our ability to deliver within the range that we pointed out to today. And as we look ahead over the next few months, typically, we have delivered this guidance in February. We're delivering it now because we do have strong confidence, and we believe that whatever unfolds in the months ahead that we'll be able to adjust our plan to hit the mark in terms of the guidance that we delivered.
Great. And then maybe just a follow-up on the mentioned economic development opportunities. You mentioned you've gotten some interest from an impressive several gigawatts of potential opportunities. Just any high-level thoughts on like how you factor in potential double counting, like, say, if those customers are also submitting those inbounds to other utilities or service territories?
Yes, sure. And look, I think you're absolutely right. We pointed out on our slide that we have tens of thousands of megawatts of additional new demand. So a significant amount. We certainly expect that if we call it double counting, but a lot of these folks are looking at the same properties and you've got developers as well as hyperscalers. And so yes, there's certainly duplication in there. So what we're doing is really working through with each of those counterparties in a methodical way.
We mentioned that we had progress with potential counterparties representing 7 gigawatts of demand. and we're working through with them on evaluating the sites, the transmission access, the generation that might be needed to serve them. And eventually, we expect that to be narrowed down. It's one of the reasons why we have been cautious about not really announcing any of this load until we get a construction agreement because these conversations have to progress to the point where we have a construction agreement.
[ Another ] thing to keep in mind, as we mentioned in our prepared remarks, that we expect that over the coming months, we'll get even greater visibility, we'll have a better sense of what the demand might be over the coming years and be able to incorporate that into our plans for incremental generation. So expect to put a stake -- a different -- a greater stake in the ground, if you will, in February, which is when we believe we'll be in a position to update some of those sales forecasts and update our IRP.
And the next question comes from the line of Paul Patterson with Glenrock Associates.
So just a few quick questions. On the [ refill ] group plan, it looks like, I guess, they're going to have oral arguments, I guess, based on what the AG wanted. Any thoughts about that? I mean at this late date that they're looking at doing that?
Yes. Paul, I don't think I'd read anything into that. Obviously, there are some differences, which I think because of the hard work of our teams, along with various stakeholders in these cases, we've really narrowed down the potential adjustments that folks have argued for. If you look on Slide 21 in our materials, we laid out where the proposed rate base would be taken into consideration potential adjustments that have been advocated by various parties. You see where the staff is and where the ALJ came out. But I think it's normal that you have oral arguments over the remaining differences. But again, I'd point to the ALJ's proposed order, which certainly gives us confidence in terms of where this may land with the commission when they ultimately decide in December.
Yes. Paul, this is Michael. I was just going to add, Paul. I think these oral arguments have been scheduled for a long time. It's fairly typical and they're actually being held November 20. So as Marty said, I think what we have today is a constructive data point from the ALJ. I think all the intervenors are recommending approval of the grid plan at this point, and we'll just see where the arguments take us.
Okay. Great. And then on Slide 9, you mentioned the transmission projects and the reliability and also the lowering customer costs. I was wondering if you just could elaborate a little bit more on the customer cost side, like what this might mean to customers because we don't see them. Go ahead, I'm sorry.
Yes. No, that's okay, Paul. I mean we're really referring to and we added a bullet which we haven't had in the past, the customer benefits in a range of 1.3 to 5.6x in terms of the portfolio cost. So -- and that relates to the overall approximately $22 billion of projects. So when MISO goes through these and they propose these various projects, I mean one of the things they do is obviously estimate the cost of these projects, which we've listed at least for the projects in our service territory down below. But they also do an assessment of what the benefits to the customers are going to be in relation to those costs. And each of these projects has positive math behind it, if you will, that suggests that customers' cost over time will be lower as a result of these investments. So that's what we're really trying to point out.
Okay. But there's not going to be some dramatic cost, I guess, when these new lines show up and cheaper stuff comes in? Or is it -- I mean, I'm just sort of -- I'm wondering if there's any quantification on a rate impact? Or is it sort of just -- it's sort of all mixed up together and it's going to take some time for it all to show up kind of thing?
Yes. I mean I think it will show up over time. I don't have any exact rate impact to point to.
Okay. And then finally, on the new customers. You mentioned with one tranche of the new customers that there was 90% in Missouri versus Illinois, I guess. And I guess I was wondering, when people are looking to -- with all these discussions that you're having, is there one service territory that's more attractive or there's more interest in versus another? Or is the flavor as to -- if there is, what might be driving that?
Yes. Look, we have data center interest really in each of the states. So if you look over to the right, on that [ Slide 10 ], we talked about tens of thousands of megawatts of potential new demand. And you see various elements of that. And I would say, today, in our pipeline, it's about 75% data centers, 15% manufacturing and 10% other is probably how that breaks down. Within that data center interest that we've got, about 65% of it is Missouri and 35% of it is Illinois today in terms of what's in our pipeline.
So there's clearly data center interest in each of the states. And each of the states is attractive for various reasons and in some cases, different reasons. But what we have announced to date with respect to these construction agreements, which is more over on the left, where we have 250 megawatts of data center demand, 100 megawatts of additional load from a variety of sources, it just so happens that 90% of that is actually in Missouri and about 10% of that is Illinois today in terms of those agreements that we have in place.
Now as we look ahead, certainly, the impact to us from an earnings perspective is going to be differentiated in the 2 states. In Illinois, Obviously, if we have transmission or distribution investment that supports that load growth, we get the earnings impact of that in Missouri, which is vertically integrated, we also have the impact of the opportunity to earn on any incremental generation.
Okay. But there's no -- [ that's the way it fell out ], I guess.
The next question comes from the line of Carly Davenport with Goldman Sachs.
Maybe just to follow up on an earlier question on the earnings guidance range. As you think about '25 growth at just over 7% relative to the midpoint of '24. Can you just give us your thoughts on looking forward where you see yourself in the range just taking into consideration some of the incremental opportunities you've highlighted? And if there's any potential upside to that range going forward?
Yes. Carly, look, I mean, in terms of our range, we've said 6% to 8% is our EPS CAGR that we're targeting for the period 2024 to 2028 as I mentioned earlier, when we look back, we've got a strong track record of delivering above the midpoint, above 7% and our goals as we look ahead is to deliver at or above. As you said, I mean, we have some positive data points we're seeing today. Again, one of the things is this load growth, which we just talked about some potential load growth. We're working hard to bring that to fruition for the benefit of our customers, our communities, and we're going to work hard to do that.
But at this point, I'd say that's where we're at. Now we'll come out in February. We'll provide our perspectives on load growth going forward, update our investment plans, and we'll note any potential implications on our guidance. But feel good about the 6% to 8%. And again, our target of hitting at or above that midpoint. Michael, anything to add?
Carly, it's Michael. I think it's well said. The only one thing I might add is just, again, the overall backlog of investment opportunities Marty talked about this earlier. We got the $55 billion that we continue to point to. I think that pipeline remains robust. We talked about this opportunity just with the data centers that could potentially drive some additional capital. So I mean, your question specifically was what could take you to the upside of that. I think it's those additional investment opportunities over time.
I think there's also opportunities, as Marty said, not only just from the data center, but the underlying economic data within -- certainly in the Missouri territory is very strong today. Just looking at the overall employment, the EDP rate, we're seeing customer growth, which we just alluded to, we're seeing customer count growth, population growth, all of those things, I think, are a great backdrop. And then we continue to think about just how do we optimize the financing of this going forward. So that's where I'd probably leave it at this point.
Got it. Great. That's super helpful. And then maybe just another quick one. You've previously talked about some O&M reductions coming in the second half of the year. Looks like 3Q was still up year-over-year, but then you called out some efficiencies in the earning driver slides for 4Q. Are you able to give some color on what types of programs you're sort of pursuing there? And if what you've called out on the slides is all inclusive of what you're looking at on [ them ]?
Yes, you bet. And you're right, we have been pointing to this towards the beginning of the year said it was in the back half. And I think you're certainly seeing that show up in as you look specifically $0.05, you look at where we're opening to in the fourth quarter year-over-year, expecting $0.03 and $0.01 in Missouri and Illinois Natural Gas, respectively. And again, just consistent with some of the things I've talked about in the past. I mean this is not some -- new to us. We've been after these programs for a long time. Beginning of the year, we talked specifically about some things that we were doing around just being thoughtful with respect to headcount, discretionary spend coming out of some of the Illinois decision. I think we've continued to lean into that. We continue to find more opportunities, looking at spans and layers, looking at simplification.
I mean, we just -- we have an opportunity for us to just be more consistent across our platform, which drives efficiencies back-end reduction of overhead costs, et cetera. And so -- we do a lot of benchmarking and as you see some of that public benchmark, and we benchmark well, but in areas we have opportunities. And so wherever we're benchmarking, we're constantly looking at how do we move up a quartile. And I think the team is absolutely committed to this, and we have not exhausted all the opportunities at this point.
[Operator Instructions] And the next question comes from the line of Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Jefferies.
It's actually [ Brian Russo ] on for Julien.
Just to follow up on Ameren Transmission, it looks like just the assumption in the '25 versus '24, it looks like growth in rate base is pushing 9%, and it seems that the growth there is accelerating, right, as we move through the 5-year plan, which in, I guess, the double-digit overall rate base growth CAGR. Is the near term in '25 and '26, really just the prior MISO tranche projects that have been approved and that you're developing? And then is there any possibility of these tranche 2 projects being pulled forward versus the early to mid-2030s target dates?
As it relates to the MISO projects, the Tranche one projects, I'd tell you, the construction there is really going to take place between 2026 and 2030 is our projection today. And then some of these MISO Tranche 2.1 projects, those will probably go in service in the 2032 to 2034 timeframe. We think most of the expenditures for those are outside of the current 5-year period, although we'll be certainly looking to accelerate those, if possible. There's no reason that Tranche 2 project work and Tranche 1 project work can't overlap, so we'll be looking to bring those to fruition for the benefit of our customers and communities as soon as we can once they're once they're approved and once they're assigned to us. And then otherwise, we always have ongoing projects in the transmission space that are outside of those that are part of the tranche one or Tranche 2 that are approved through annual MISO processes. And so those continue to be foundational in our overall spending and growth in the transmission space.
The only thing I might add to it, I mean, if you think about the $55 billion pipeline, we've talked about this, about $5 billion is in there with respect to the LRTP projects, [ Brian ]. So if you think about Tranche 1, we had the [ $1.8 billion ] assigned, the $700 million on the competitive projects. there was some variation of those ultimately where they ended up settling out. But then you have this Tranche 2.1, which will, again, we'll see what [ Alta ] gets assigned were competitive, but there's $3.6 billion eligible projects. And then they're going to obviously roll into this 2.2 tranche. And so I mean, I'm just giving you the math, if you kind of want to think about that $5 billion, you can see the pipeline associated with getting there pretty easily.
Okay. Great. And just as we look towards the 2025 Missouri legislative session, how active will Ameren be or involved in any posed bills that I think might need to be proposed as early as this December, whether it's PISA, also for you or gas-fired generation, any ROFR or, I guess, expanding expediting the generation review, which would, I think, tie into maybe your February 2025 IRP update.
Yes. Look, those are all potential considerations that are very logical. Last session, we were advocating for things along those lines, which was an expansion of PISA to be able to cover generation assets, extending the sunset date on the PISA legislation to a later date to make sure it overlapped and covered some of the generation assets that are included in our IRP.
We did and continue to advocate for a right of first refusal on transmission because, again, we think critical to get these transmission projects done sooner rather than later, just talk about the great benefit to cost ratios, they've got -- and of course, I think they're key as well as building incremental duration to making sure that we've got reliable power, low-cost power here in our region. So those are going to be key things that we focus on.
And then my sense is that there'll be a variety of other things that could be considered as we focus on as a state on economic development, job creation and making sure that we've got strong, reliable, affordable, balanced portfolio of energy resources to be able to meet the needs of prospective customers. So certainly be considering all of those things as we move towards that next legislative session.
The next question comes from the line of David Paz with Wolfe Research.
[ You maybe ] just hit on this, but let me ask it a little differently. I maybe elaborate on how some of these potential agreements with large load customers may transpire. Could they entail like potential generation that the customer helps cover directly, and then just how are regulators and policymakers facilitating those type of discussions if [ they ] are?
Yes. Good question. Yes. I think that as we look at some of the potential load growth, specifically in Missouri, where we're vertically integrated and we own generation. We've got to be thoughtful about what incremental resources might be needed to serve some of the incremental load. We mentioned on our last call with respect to this 350 megawatts of additional load that's been announced with the construction agreements, we have the available resources to be able to serve them.
But as these load forecasts grow, we're going to need to consider additional resources. And so that's under consideration now. That's going to be what we'll be trying to work through as we think about updating our integrated resource plan early next year. And I think that plan when we file, it will deliver more clarity in terms of our thoughts there.
And then with respect to the incremental cost, yes, it's something we need to think through as we think about the incremental investments that will be made to serve all of our customers, including these additional customers just need to think through the appropriate [ apportion that of ] costs so that all parties are treated fairly. So that's an ongoing consideration, ongoing dialogue with some of the some of the entities that are looking to expand here. And I think those conversations will continue over the coming months.
Yes, David, it's Manuel. Just pointing out the obvious, I mean, we obviously, historically were a bit long, right? And we began this transition and we had some of these plants closing. Obviously, we have less link today. And adding Castle Bluff that Marty talked about earlier, that's certainly that step in that right direction. And then that's exactly what the team is evaluating as part of this IRP evaluation and whether we're going to need to file again is trying to take some various scenarios under these load growth opportunities in match that really up against our generation to see if we need to add additional generation on top of that.
I would just say this, yes, and look, when you look at our IRP, you can see the elements that we might move forward. I mean we had renewable resources in there we'll be evaluating. Can we pull those forward? Can we pull forward battery storage technology? As Michael said, we've got some simple cycle, combined cycle that we need to add some additional gas-fired generation. I mean these are the elements we're looking at as we think about updating that IRP.
Okay. That makes sense. And then just on '25 quickly, do you anticipate you were consistent EPS growth that you gave in February to be based off of '25 guidance?
I mean that's sort of been our historical practice, David, that we'll update based on whatever that midpoint is for that '25 or in this case, it's that [ $4.95 ]. So that would be the expectation.
And the next question comes from the line of Nick Campanella with Barclays.
I got off a little late, I'll try not to repeat. But clearly, you gave '25 guide earlier here, which is [ a solid ] confidence going into next year, capital is going up. How much capital is going up in the near term versus kind of the long term of your financial plan? And then as that impact your equity needs, do you still just kind of programmatically lean on the ATM? Or would you kind of contemplate other mechanisms around that?
Nick, Michael here. Yes, I mean, from a capital perspective, I mean, I just continue to think in terms of the $21.9 billion that's out there, right? And so we've talked about a number of factors that we're updating for and just spent some time talking about this IRP. And so that's the process that we're going through and going through our typical capital planning process, as we speak, and putting the final touches on that. And that's what we'll come out with here in February.
From a financing perspective, the plan that we put out there last February still stands today, focused on that $300 million. Got that largely done for 2024, we're starting to lean in to the '25 piece. I got about [ $155 million of that $600 million ] done. In terms of ongoing financing assumptions, we've talked about this. We like our ratings where they are, the Baa1, BBB+, downgrade threshold of 17 at S&P, we've got quite a bit of margin there. the threshold metric for us is on S&P, 17. And so that's the one we'll continue to want from a financing assumption standpoint, I would -- you should assume what we sort of put out there at this point. And so maintaining those and that consolidated equity ratio of around 40%, which is where it is today.
I appreciate that. And then just maybe some considerations with the election that just happened. I believe that there is some EPA-driven investments in plant today. Just do you think any of that could change -- and then how would you kind of quantify your positioning around the new candidate? And can you also kind of clarify if you have transferability cash flow of the plan?
Yes. Well, I think the -- obviously, the election just happened. I think that, look, when we think about the election overall, one of the things to keep in mind is in our strategy and our priorities of the company certainly don't change. And our focus is on making great infrastructure investments for the benefit of our customers and communities advocating for energy policies that maximize that value.
And of course, as I mentioned before, seeking great economic development opportunities and we're going to be working with policymakers to make sure we maximize the benefit of those for our communities. Well, you didn't ask about this. I mean, I think the most significant area of focus coming out of the federal election is probably going to be around tax policy. And as you know, as a fully rate-regulated company, all the increases and decreases in taxes flow directly through to our customers' rates. So things like the corporate income tax rate, the value of tax credits, those are things that have pretty meaningful effects on our customer rates.
So my sense is with Republican leadership, it's going to be certainly be less likely that we see an increase in corporate taxes. And I think that's a positive for our customers from a build perspective. And I do expect there's going to be a conversation around some of these clean energy tax provisions in the IRA. And so I think we, in our industry, we'll all engage with policymakers on the considerations and my expectation is that Republicans will probably take a surgical approach to adjustments to the IRA given some of the direct customer benefits.
For us, specifically, I'd say the most meaningful benefits of the tax credits around solar, battery storage, nuclear and wind. And so those are some of the things we'll be thinking about. You mentioned transferability, transferability of tax credits is important to us, and we'll make sure that policymakers are certainly aware of the importance of those, too.
Frankly, based on our IRP that we have on record, we filed, all of those things have a value of about $1.5 billion of positive value those tax credits to our customers in Missouri alone. So it's a significant benefit, and that's over about a 10-year period, the next 10-year period in our IRP. So let's make sure that as we engage with policymakers, whatever they decide that at least they have those facts and they're aware of those benefits that we expect to have for our customers. And at the end of the day, you should know that we're the [ embedment ] in our system that we're going to make or whatever we think are appropriate from a reliability and affordability perspective and as we continue to adopt some of the new technologies that are out there. So I think those are the biggest points of the election.
You mentioned EPA rules. I think that with respect to the EPA rules and the CapEx that we have in our plans today, I don't see those as changing. The EPA's greenhouse gas rules on the other hand, that are working their way through the courts. I do expect it ultimately those rules will be stayed given some of the provisions that are in them with respect to carbon capture and storage and co-firing with natural gas. And we'll see what happens with respect to those proposed rules as we go through sort of a change in administration and change in legislature. But I think those rules, personally in my mind, are flawed as they stand today. So those would be my comments. Any other questions from you?
I would say that you answered the 4-part question very well. I appreciate it. And thanks. See you in Florida.
You bet.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I'll turn the call back to Marty Lyons for closing remarks.
Terrific. Okay. Thank you all for joining us today. As you can tell, we remain absolutely focused on closing the year very strong, and we look forward to seeing many of you at the conference next week. So again, thank you very much, and everybody, have a great day.
This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.