Steel Authority of India Ltd
NSE:SAIL
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
89.2
174.35
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q2-2024 Analysis
Steel Authority of India Ltd
The company is focusing on cost analysis for the CapEx of ISP with a goal to reduce expenses. Over the next 4 to 5 years, they expect an expenditure of INR 15,000 crores to INR 20,000 crores, which will include debottlenecking initiatives and new installations such as coke oven batteries. This investment is projected to result in an additional steel volume of approximately 3.5 million tonnes, which will come in phases over three years.
For the current fiscal year, the company has established a production target of 19 million tonnes and expects sales volume to closely match production, estimating a range of 18 to 18.5 million tonnes. This is despite minimal inventory being carried over from previous quarters.
Domestic demand remains robust, and the company has managed to reduce stock levels by about 3 lakh tonnes from Q1 levels. There's some pressure from imports, but the overall impact on local producers is expected to be limited due to the relatively smaller volume of imports compared to India's total production. Pricing for flat products seems to be impacted by import pricing pressures, while long products have been less affected.
The company faced a rise in pricing from a provisional INR 67,500 to INR 85,300, and sold approximately 0.92 million tonnes to the railways during FY '21-'22. Although the cost of coking coal decreased by INR 4,000 to INR 5,000 per tonne, there have been marginal increases in operating expenditures due to higher maintenance activities as well as a rise in salaries and wages by about INR 280 crores. These increases, coupled with lower net sales realization, have capped profitability improvements.
Looking ahead, the caster at Bhilai is expected to start contributing by FY '24-'25, with capacity utilization initially at 60% and eventually ramping up. Rourkela's contribution will follow in two years' time. These developments should cumulatively add about 2 million tonnes to the production capacity in the longer term, with at least 1 million tonnes expected from FY '25-'26 onwards.
The company anticipates employee-related expenses to be around INR 12,000 crores for the entire year.
Executives conveyed a strong commitment to enhancing operational efficiencies and expressed optimism about favorable market conditions in upcoming quarters, setting an expectant tone for the company's performance and its benefits to investors.
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the Q2 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call of Steel Authority of India, hosted by Nuvama Wealth Management. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded.
I now hand the conference over to Mr. Ashish Kejriwal from Nuvama Wealth Management. Thank you, and over to you.
Thank you, Yashashsri. Good afternoon, everyone. On behalf of Nuvama Wealth Management, we are delighted to have Mr. Anil Tulsiani, Director of Finance, along with his team, for Q2 FY '24 conference call. Now I would request Mr. Tulsiani to have his opening remarks, and thereafter, we can open the floor for Q&A. Over to you, sir.
Thank you, Mr. Ashish. Good afternoon, everyone. Let me welcome all our investors and analysts who are joining this results call for the financial results of SAIL for the period Q2 FY '24 and H1 FY '24. Though the detailed results are already available on the website of the company and the stock exchanges, I would briefly appraise you on the same before we move to the question-and-answer session, where we would be happy to address your queries.
Let me first appraise you on the economic scenario in which we have been operating. The global economy, we saw a sharp improvement in 2021 after the initial waves of COVID, was adversely impacted on account of multiple factors like the inflationary pressures and consequent tightening of the monetary policies, geopolitical sessions leading to disruptions in supply chain, slowdown in major economies like China and Europe causing major imbalances in the global demand supply, et cetera.
The inflationary situation in 2023 has eased to an extent vis-a-vis 2022, but the decline has been gradual, leading to a growth rate rising moderately. There are projections of further decline in the inflation which is a sign of relief, although the rate is expected to remain gradual as the global economy continues to be impacted adversely due to the factors discussed earlier. International Monetary Fund in its latest World Economic Outlook of October '23 has projected a growth of 3% and 2.9% in 2023 and 2024, respectively, which is lower than the estimates of 3.5% for 2022.
Now coming to the world steel scenario. In line with economic situation, the global steel scenario has seen its graph falling drastically after the phenomenal rise in 2022. In fact, the world's steel output during 9 months of the calendar year '23 has fallen by 0.1% over CPLY. The world's steel narrative cannot be complete without the mention of Chinese steel industry. China after 2 straight years of decline in the crude steel production is poised to improve upon its performance in the current calendar year. The growth during 9 months was 1.6% over CPLY. However, the worrying factor here is that despite this modest performance by the world's largest steel producer, its share in the global output has risen consistently and reached the pre-COVID levels of around 57%. This highlights the contraction of the performance by the rest of the world, barring isolated performances by India and a few other countries.
However, the projections for steel demand points to a turnaround during 2023 and 2024, although again, a gradual recovery. World Steel Association in its Short Range Outlook published during October '23 has projected a growth of 1.8% and 1.9% during 2023 and 2024, respectively. Meanwhile, Indian economy continues to fare better than its counterpart and this has maintained relative stability in the domestic market. The Indian economy registered GDP growth of 7.2% in financial year '23 and 7.84% during Q1 of financial year '24, which has helped it maintain its position as one of the fastest growing amongst the major economies. At the same time, the economy has countered the forces of inflation better than the other economies by judicious use of increase in repo rates by the RBI.
Indian steel industry has been one of the few to maintain a positive growth in both production and consumption of steel during financial year '23. The steel production grew by more than 5% and the consumption by more than 13%. During the current financial year as well, the increase in production and consumption has been in the range of 2%. The demand in India is projected to grow by 8.5% and 10.7% during the calendar year '23 and calendar year '24, respectively.
The domestic industry has, however, felt the impact of volatility in the prices in line with the global trends. The coking coal prices, which had cooled in Q1 of financial year '24 are currently hovering in the range of USD 300 per tonne for hard coking coal and around $200 per tonne for PCI. The pricing of steel have also been operating in a narrow bank due to pressures of imports of [indiscernible].
Coming to the performance of the company. SAIL has registered its best-ever second quarter physical performance during Q2 financial '24 -- financial year '24. The performance during the first half has also grown accordingly. Crude steel production during Q2 stood at 4.8 million tonne as against 4.3 million tonne in CPLY, a growth of 12%. Crude steel during H1 stood at 9.5 million tonne as against 8.6 million tonne in CPLY, a growth of 10%.
Saleable steel production during Q2 stood at 4.8 million tonne as against 4.1 million tonnes in CPLY, a growth of 17%. Saleable steel production during H1 stood at 9.2 million tonnes as against 8.2 million tonnes in CPLY, a growth of more than 12%.
Sales volume during Q2 stood at 4.8 million tonnes as against 4.2 MT in CPLY, a growth of more than 13%. Sales volumes during H1 stood at 8.7 million tonnes as against 7.4 million tonnes CPLY, a growth of more than 17%. Domestic sales during Q2 stood at 4.7 million tonnes as against 4.1 million tonnes in CPLY, a growth of more than 14%. The exports, however, declined to 0.07 million tonnes from 0.11 million tonnes in CPLY. Domestic sales during H1 grew by around 19% to reach 8.4 million tonnes.
On the financial front, the company registered a growth of 13% over CPLY in the sales turnover to stand at INR 29,560 crores during Q2 financial year '24, which is again the best ever Q2. The sales for H1 also are the highest recorded in any H1 ever. The improvement in the turnover was aided by the benefit of rail price revision for financial year '22 of about INR 1,750 crores, which was long overdue. There was consequent improvement in the profitability as the company turned back into black during Q2 financial year '24 compared to the loss during CPLY.
The profit before and after tax during the quarter stood at INR 1,696 crores and INR 1,241 crores, respectively. H1 profit registered an improvement of more than 250% over CPLY despite taking the hit on account of liability under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme II of INR 415 crores. PBT and PAT during H1 stood at INR 1,898 crores and INR 1,390 crore compared to INR 523 crores and INR 391 crores, respectively in CPLY.
In the area of operational efficiency, the company has been making steady progress for reducing coal, coke consumption, increasing the usage of CDI, bringing down the specific energy consumption and improving BF productivity. Continuing with the drive towards improving the product mix. The proportion of semis and saleable steel stood at less than 15%. By engaging conversion services in and around the plant -- demand sector, the percentage share of semi in sales has even lower at 8%. As a responsible corporate, we have been taking several measures for environment conservation over the years. Trials like Zero Liquid Discharge, eco-restoration of areas, regions around the plants, mines, plantation of trees and saplings, use of alternate sources of energy like hydropower and solar power, et cetera, will continue as we move towards sustainable and green steel.
The company has been engaged in numerous CSR activities across the country and primarily in the vicinity of our plants and units. The activities are undertaken and conformity with the Companies Act as well as the DPE guidelines. Going forward, the challenges from higher coking coal price during Q3 prevails, but given the current price trend, the cost should come down in Q4 financial year '24.
With the outlook positive for a sustained growth in domestic consumption, we are hopeful of realizations and consequently, the margin will improve for the company in the quarters to come. Further, we are also expecting the benefit of revision and the provision lend price of rails by the Indian railways for the current supply. This has added straight to the top line as well as the bottom line of the company.
With these words, I hand it back to Mr. Kejriwal for opening the Q&A session. I'm sure you all have a lot of queries on the performance. Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] We have a first question from the line of Amit Dixit from ICICI Securities.
Yes. Congratulations for a good set of numbers. I have a couple of questions. The first one is on coking coal. So if you can let us know the coking coal cost that went into P&L in Q2? And how is it likely to evolve in Q3? Also, I'd like to understand that we have seen BCCL raising its production and sales. How does it help us because BCCL is a primary subsidiary for coking coal in India? That is the first question.
Yes. Thank you. Actually, the coking coal prices, which were around INR 27,800. This is -- we are talking about the imported coal. It was in the range of around about INR 27,800 in Q1. They came down to the levels of INR 23,000 in Q2. But again, the prices have started going up. And we expect that the average cost of this imported coking coal will be in the range of INR 27,000 per tonne as far as consumption is concerned.
And coming to BCCL, we have got sort of an MOU with them regarding coal. And most of our coal -- indigenous coal is supplied by BCCL to us. And we have a pricing arrangement with them, which is basically linked with the price of imported coal.
Sir, is it possible to quantify if you are getting some -- if you're getting higher supply from BCCL? And what would be approximate ball park difference between international price and BCCL?
Yes. You can say that we are getting around about 15% of our coal, which is indigenous in nature. Out of which some you can say 3% to 4% will be from our own washeries and collieries. And the rest is supplied by BCCL. And the price differential between the 2 because we have got some upper and low bands where -- of the supply is being made by the BCCL. So the upper band is around INR 12,500, which we are operating now.
Okay. Okay. Got it. The second question is essentially on the benefit of this revision provisional rail prices. So while we have booked around INR 1,750 crores this quarter, is there a further benefit that we can expect for FY '22 and -- in this -- in Q3 or Q4? And will some benefit of Q3 -- sorry, FY '23 will also come or FY '23 will come next year?
Basically, what has happened is that we have taken the entire benefit for FY '22. Now for FY '23 and continuing on in FY '24, we have been getting a provisional price of INR 67,500 per tonne. Whereas the fire price finalized for FY '21-'22 is around about INR 85,300. So basically, what will happen is that we will be getting -- we will be approaching the railways to give us an ad hoc increase until we submit the cost data of '22-'23 to the CA Cost Organization and it is finalized. So we will be requesting for an ad hoc increase for '22-'23 as well as '23-'24 since our costs are much more.
Sir, just to be clear, sir, you said INR 57,500 per tonne we are getting for FY '23-'24?
INR 67,500.
INR 57,500?
INR 67,500. 6-7.
INR 67,000. And we are -- and the price increase that we have got for FY '22 is INR 87,300?
INR 85,300.
INR 85,300. But first, since FY '22 prices have also come down, so do you expect to get INR 85,300 only or prices for FY '23-'24 would be a little bit lower?
We will not be able to comment on the FY '23-'24. But regarding the FY '22-'23, it is basically -- the entire thing is based on our costs, which is being intimated to the CA Cost Organization who verifies that. So we don't see that there will be any reduction from that since -- in the financial year '22-'23, the cost of coal had also gone up substantially as compared to '21-'22.
We have a next question from the line of Kirtan Mehta from BOB Capital Markets.
Strong performance on the sales and production side. One follow-up on the rail pricing. In terms of -- we are currently sort of getting a provisional price of INR 67,500. Against that, what would be our current cost based rail cost at this point of time?
We would not like to disclose our cost. But then based on our costs and on return on our equity and all the -- whatever is the calculation made, for financial year '21-'22, they had initially given us INR 67,500 as the ad hoc pricing for that and finally gave us INR 85,300 -- so based on, again, our costs in '22-'23 and subsequently in '23-'24, we'll be again working it out and submitting it to the CA cost organization for their evaluation and finally giving us the price.
Right. So right now, FY '23 as well as FY '24 billing is also getting done at INR 67,500 only? Or is that a different number?
That is at INR 67,500.
And FY '23, have we already submitted our cost workings to them? And is it waiting for their approval? Or we are yet to submit it?
We will be submitting it shortly. Actually, we are waiting for the finalization of the '21-'22 cost. So once it is finalized, based on whatever assumptions are there, which are acceptable to both the CA Cost Organization and SAIL, we will rework and submit for '22-'23.
Understood. Another question was about the semis. During the opening remark, you mentioned that currently proportion is 15%. But using the external conversion services, we are able to reduce it to 8%. Could you give us more color on what exactly the semis' proportion in the sales currently is? And where are we deploying the external conversion services?
External conversions, we have got our wet leasing arrangements also, and we also have our conversion agents who convert mainly our long products. It's basically for the long products. So we have got conversion agents for our TMTs and also for our structures. So we have it converted by them and sell it on our brand name. So semis are basically sales, which are used out there for that. And besides this, we also have had some semis which we provide to our customers who use it for other purposes also, not using our brand name.
Understood. So is our semis proportion in the sales mix is down to 8% after using the conversion agents?
Yes, yes, yes.
And how much do we spend externally with -- what would be the average cost of conversion that we pay out externally? So what would be the margin difference on the conversion -- externally converted items?
See, it's basically what is happening is that we have our this thing, our cost for the semis, which we have got. And we have our contracts with our conversion agents, which are finalized based on a proper tendering process. And then again, whatever we go and sell in the market, it is based on whatever is the prevailing market rate for those particular products. So the margins are always there in that.
Understood. Just 1 more question was on the -- our universal section mill and the mid structural section mill that we have been operating, what would be the utilization rates on those mills at this point of time?
They've improved a lot. Actually, we have planned for more than 6 lakh tonnes of -- from the medium structural mill and even a similar quantity from the universal structural mills also. And the growth of production from these mills has been, you can say, phenomenal in the last 2 to 3 years. The exact figure, I can just give it to you off-line if you want it later on.
Sure, sir. So which is the plant where -- as of now but we are not seeing the corresponding improvement coming into the respective plant profit level. So is it primarily because of the higher coking coal cost that we are facing? Because of that this is not visible into the plant profit levels?
Yes. It is basically on 2 counts. Though, as I have mentioned to you, in the second quarter, the price of imported coal has come down by around over INR 5,000, okay? But then the NSR fall has also been quite a large quantum. the NSR debt which was there in Q2 as compared to Q1, has been around, you can say, INR 3,000.
Okay. Right. And 1 more question, if I may. Would you be able to give us a color on the current sort of the flat and long product realization? And how does they compare with the QT averages that we have realized?
Yes. Actually, the differential is in the range of INR 3,000 to INR 4,000. The flat being higher than the long.
This is the current differential. And how was it during the Q2?
Then I'm talking about -- actually in the Q2, it was -- the flat was in the range of INR 55,000 as compared to INR 51,000 of long. And if you take for Q1, again INR 57,500, it was almost INR 54,500.
Right, sir. And would you be able to indicate the current pricing levels as well?
Current pricing actually in the average of the month of October was INR 56,000 -- around INR 56,000. In which, the long was INR 54,000 and again, the flat was INR 57,000.
[Operator Instructions] We have a next question from the line of Rajesh Majumdar from B&K Securities.
Sir, I had actually a question on your overall debt and CapEx. It seems that the cash flow from operations has improved substantially this first half but there has been no debt reduction. And the CapEx rate is still very high. So what is going on in terms of our debt plans? And we are still doing a significantly high rate despite all our major expansion program coming to an end. So what is going to be our long-term plan in terms of steel production, CapEx and debt, if you could give us some light on that?
The CapEx during the first half was in the range of INR 2,000-odd crores, INR 2,100 crores, you can say. And for the year '23-'24, we are likely to end up with a CapEx of INR 5,500 crores, which is more or less in line with the CapEx which was there in '22-'23. Now coming to a debt reduction. Actually, if you would see our figures, as on 31st March '23, the debt was in the range of INR 25,500 crores. It went up to almost INR 29,500 crores as on 30th June. And then again, we have brought it down to the 31st March levels of INR 25,500 crores. And we expect that by the year-end, we'll be probably having a debt around about INR 22,000 crores.
So this INR 22,000 crores -- a reduction of, you can say, INR 3,500 crores with a CapEx of INR 5,500 crores during this period. This is what we are looking at.
And this is despite coking coal price increase this quarter which you had already mentioned, right?
Yes. Yes. This is including that.
And sir, how much of the CapEx is maintenance CapEx and how much of it is gross CapEx? And what is the guideline for that?
At the moment, the growth CapEx is quite minimal. It is mainly the maintenance CapEx. The growth CapEx, we expect it to start only after, you can say, from maybe '25, 2025 onwards.
Will we increase our CapEx significantly in FY '25 including the growth CapEx in that year?
No, no, not much because see -- I'm not talking about '24-'25. I'm talking about '25-'26, where there will be some payments -- payment outflows for the design engineering part, you can say, of the first moderation, which is going to come up. That is for ISP, we will be having the expenditures on these design engineering part of it and some supplies and some civil jobs and all. That will take place in '25-'26. And subsequently, it will peak from '27-'28 onwards.
And our normal maintenance capital is about INR 4,000 crores, INR 5,000 crores still, right?
Yes. Between that range. It is that much only.
So '26 onwards, our growth CapEx will pick up, is what you're saying?
Yes.
So what is our estimate of cash flows -- annual cash flows in that year that we are looking at in terms of full capacity? And what is the kind of annual cash flows we're looking at to fund that kind of growth CapEx?
Yes, it will be in the range -- because we are receiving investment in moderation and expansion of more than INR 1 lakh crore. So when it peaks, in those particular years, it may be in the range of INR 25,000 crores in each year.
This is -- cash flows?
Yes, that is the cash flows.
We have our next question from the line of Raashi Chopra from Citigroup.
Sorry, if I repeat question. I missed some of the data points on the NSR. So could you just please highlight again what we average NSR for this quarter? What was it for flat and long?
Yes. For this quarter, the average NSR was INR 53,400. And if you take -- if you bifurcate it between flat and long; for flat, it was INR 55,190 or INR 55,200, you can say; and for long, INR 51,300.
And you indicated that the October prices are INR 57,000 for flat and INR 54,000 for long, is that correct?
Yes.
Okay. And what are your expectations -- I mean, for November, December, like given that there is still some premium to import parity?
Actually, there is a lot of pressure of imports, which are now coming up. So November, we are trying to at least retain the prices, whatever was there in the month of October. December, we cannot predict the future. So though we would like to -- we would like to say that December onwards, the infrastructure activities and all the building activities start picking up. So maybe we may get some sort of improvement in pricing during these 2 months -- during the month of December.
We have our next question from the line of Aditya Welekar from Axis Securities.
Sir, if you can just reiterate our CapEx expansion plans and plant-wise, how we are -- currently where we are in the stage of approvals and what will be the sequence of CapEx and start of expansion? When it will start? From which fiscal year? And our internal threshold when we go for an expansion, what will be our internal ratio with respect to our debt management? So -- because we have seen in the past that in the expansion phase, the debt was slightly -- I mean, the debt control is one of the concern -- area of concern. So from that perspective, when we go for the next phase of expansion, how we will look at our capital allocation and our debt control?
Yes. This -- initially now, first of all, but going in for setting of our assets, where actually we'll be trying to improve our exist -- utilization of our existing by some minor investments. And then after that, we are going in for the greenfield expansion of IISCO Steel Plant. For that, we will be most probably will be coming to the Board for its in-principal approval maybe by the end of this quarter or maybe at the beginning of the next quarter. So we start with the expansion of IISCO Steel Plant, for which we'll get approvals and then we'll go in for tendering.
And subsequently, we are also going in for some brownfield expansions that will take place, maybe in Durgapur Steel Plant, and also to some extent in Bokaro steel. So these will also take place subsequently. So the expansion plans are such that we'll be phasing it out over the next 3 to 4 years. So that we don't have that liquidity crisis which we had faced in the earlier expansion, where we had taken up 3 major expansions at IISCO, Bhilai and Rourkela at the same time. So that is the thing.
And the other guidelines, which we have finalized in our vision document the 2030 that we will try to maintain a debt-to-equity ratio of 1:1. So all our calculations will basically depend on the debt equity ratio of 1:1.
We have our next question from the line of Vikash Singh from PhillipCapital.
Sir, just wanted to understand our net saleable capacity. We will peak out at 19 million tonnes or there is some scope of squeezing out some more volumes?
Yes. That's what I was telling me about that we'll be sweating our assets. And we'll be seeing wherever there is an opportunity to improve our production and -- means utilization on our equipment by some debottlenecking schemes and all that. We'll be taking that up within the next couple of years. So that we can...
Sir, can you quantify something?
Pardon?
Can you quantify what could be the debottlenecking additional volume?
Casters at Rourkela -- even at Bhilai having the casters out there. So these will help because we have got certain extra facilities available like a blast furnace hot metal capacity more. So we can actually use the blast furnaces more and get more steel produced through these steel -- steelmaking units. We can do that. And we may -- we are also planning to go in for finished products like we as -- we are trying to set up a TMT bar mill at Durgapur steel plant also. And certain other finishing facilities also will be improving on their efficiencies to improve the finished product.
So as of now, these are only plans, so no concrete action has been taken and that's why you can't give us quantity which could increase, right?
The casters and all, they are already under implementation.
Okay. How much extra can...
The only thing is that TMT mill what we are planning to set at Durgapur Steel Plant, that will be going in for -- means -- we'll be able to finalize that in the next few months.
Sir, in casters, just a follow-up on casters. Any quantity which you can get, this much of extra can come out in terms of finished steel?
In both the plants, it will be around about 1 million tonnes. So you can say 2 million tonnes.
Understood, sir. Sir, secondly, if I look at the Slide #20, our semi sales seems to be increased on sequential basis quite sharply. So I couldn't understand the specific reason for the same?
Vikash Ji, there seems to be some error in that slide. We have already asked that to be corrected. The current proportion, I'll just let you know. This would be around 14.6%.
Semis?
Semis.
So incrementally, everything comes down to the flat?
Yes.
Understood. And just 1 more thing. Can you just give us an update on the -- our mining assets, basically Gua, which we wanted to do a 10 million tonnes, and even Rowghat? Can you just give us some update on the same?
Yes. As far as Gua is concerned, we had gone in for a tender for appointment of MDO out there. But we have not been able to get a response out there. But in case of Rowghat also, the -- interim mining has begun already out there. And we are able to evacuate around about 30,000 to 35,000 tonnes per month from there. But the main project, which is there, it will start -- we have already appointed an MDO for that particular project also. And some [ tree-felling ] activity have started out there. And we hope that in the next 3 to 4 years, we'll be able to get sufficient material from Rowghat also.
Understood, sir. And just 1 last question. Any update on the Jharkhand inventory sell?
Not yet. We have not been able to get the clearances for that. But we are hopeful that during this financial year '23-'24, we will get the clearances for evacuation from that to some extent.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take our next question from the line of [ Sumayya V ] from Avendus Spark.
I'm sorry, his line got disconnected.
[Operator Instructions] As there are no further questions, I now hand over the call to Mr. Ashish Kejriwal from Nuvama.
Sir, 1 question from me before we can pick up 2 more questions, which are in the queue. Is it possible if you can give a volume guidance for this year? And in terms of CapEx plans also, like, for example, IISCO, how much capacity we are putting in and what kind of our CapEx will be involved at least in the first plant? And besides that, the set of assets involves -- what kind of CapEx and incremental volume from there and the time line, that will be helpful, sir?
First, if we talk about the CapEx of ISP, the DPR is under preparation and under finalization. So we are analyzing the DPR mainly to cut down the cost. So it will be too early for us to comment on this.
Regarding the sweating of assets, we have got an expenditure of around about, you can say, INR 15,000 crores to INR 20,000 crores, which will take place in the next 4 to 5 years on these additional debottlenecking schemes and like the casters which are coming up and other. Even we are planning Coke Oven -- Stamp Charged Coke Oven batteries also. So there will be certain expenditure involved for these.
So sir, when we are talking about INR 15,000 crore to INR 20,000 crore, how much additional steel volume can be generated from there?
As I told you, it will be around about 3.5 million to 4 million tonnes. 3.5 million tonnes, you can say.
Okay. And this will be in phases or it will come at one go in...
It'll be in phases. It will gradually come over the next 3 years, you can say.
And starting from FY '25 or '26?
From FY '25, you can say. '24-'25, there will be some facilities and then '25-'26, also...
Okay. Okay. And sir, this year's volume guidance, if you want to give?
Volume guidance, I think, 19 million tonnes.
You're talking about sales volume?
Production. Production. Sales also should be in the same...
We'll take our next question from the line of [ Sumayya V ] from Avendus Spark.
So first question is on the domestic demand between first half of this financial year and currently what we have seen, has demand kind of come off this first half? That's the first question. The second part to that is that you did mention import -- a bit of an increase in imports? This import parity pricing differential has been there for quite some time. What is changing now which is adding a lot more pressure from the import side?
Yes. Regarding the demand part of it, there is a very good demand as far as domestic is concerned, like we have not increased our stock levels or anything like that. On the contrary, from the Q1 stock levels, we have been able to bring it down by around about 3 lakh tonnes -- around 3 lakh tonnes. And regarding the -- what was your second question about?
Imports added pressure. So...
There is a lot of pressure for that -- there is a lot of pressure building up for that. But then if you -- actually, see, that the quantity of imports will be quite less as compared to the total production in India. So it will have an impact to -- no doubt that it will have an impact. But we are just hoping that it should not have a major impact on the local producers...
Got it. Sir, this softening in prices in the last 1 month in the industry, so I mean, is it more to do with imports, while you still see domestic demand quite strong compared to first half? Is it primarily driven by import pricing pressure?
Yes. See, the flat products will be driven by the import pricing -- because long products is slightly not affected by these -- by the imports, but the flat are being affected to some extent because of the import pricing pressures.
Got it, sir. Sir, second question on the cost, whereas your coking coal has gone up, thermal cores on the relatively lower side. So is there -- within the industry, there is a dynamic that, probably a DRI player or a secondary player are seeing their cost kind of coming lower when compared to the traditional integrated players?
Yes. Actually, the price differential is there. So that is why there is a price differential when you go for the NSR pricing also. The longs which are produced by the primary producers, they demand a premium as compared to the secondary producers. And basically, 1 more thing is that they are also not operating at capacity. They also are operating at lower than the capacity because maybe the demand is not there for that product.
Got it, sir. Sir, also with respect to the railway provision. So what was the original -- I mean, the number that we have taken for FY '21-'22 vis-a-vis the number that we have got per tonne? And also what is the quantum for FY '21-'22?
It was INR 67,500, which was a provisional pricing which we had taken earlier, and we got a pricing of around about INR 85,300. And we had actually sold around about 0.92 million tonnes to the railways during '21-'22.
Got it, sir. Sir, 1 last question on the OpEx front. You did mention that coking coal during the quarter had come down INR 4,000 to INR 5,000 per tonne -- so -- but when I see on OpEx per tonne, the number is only marginally lower. Is there any other increase in OpEx that kind of offset this full benefit? I mean...
Some marginal increase was there in the stores and spares expenditures and the expenditure on account of salaries and wages also, there were some increase. But otherwise, there is not much of an increase. Basically, if you see, though the volumes had gone up, but the net sales realization being lower. So it was -- because of that, that the profitability has not improved to the extent. But as far as salaries are concerned, they have gone up by around about INR 280-odd crores. This is basically because we have taken -- in the first quarter some provisions were not considered since the profitability was not there.
But with the improvement of profitability, some incentives and bonuses are to be given. So that has been considered for the entire half year during the period and so also for the pension also, which was considered at a base of 3% and which we are now considered at a higher rate of 8%. So the impact is for the entire year. And some expenditure on stores and spares and repairs and maintenance has been higher because in this particular quarter, some higher maintenance has been done and also the production has been substantially higher.
We have a next question from the line of Kirtan Mehta from BOB Capital Markets.
In terms of the -- you mentioned 2 casters, one at Rourkela and the another one, I think, at Bhilai. Would you be able to give a time line or target date for starting this caster? How would the ramp-up of 1 million tonne production would be the -- would it ramp up within 3 to 6 months? Or could it take longer there?
Bhilai will come soon. Probably the benefits of that will start accruing from the year '24-'25, maybe initially at a capacity utilization of 60%, then it will gradually ramp up to 75% and 90% after. And Rourkela will take 2 years.
Right, sir. One more follow-up was on the sales and production level. You mentioned that production would be 19 MT for this year, and sales would be around that. But as we don't have much inventory in our system, would sales target for the year be lesser than that?
No -- if the production is 19 MT and we have 1 million tonne of inventory, so we expect our sales also to be in the levels of around 19 MT. You can see we can consider around about 18 million tonnes to 18.5 million tonnes.
Understood, sir. And last question on the run rate for the employees cost from here on. Is the Q2 numbers include basically some of the additional provisions for the Q1 as well, what should we take as a run rate going from here on a quarterly basis?
Yes -- you can consider that for the entire year that the employee-related expenses will be to the tune around about INR 12,000 crores.
We have a next question from the line of Pratim Roy from BNK Securities.
I have 1 question that you mentioned the 2 million tonne debottlenecking is possible and another 3 million tonne to 4 million tonne is CapEx with extra capacity will come in 3 to 4 years. So for FY '25, you made a comment on that, the 19 million tonne production and 18.5 million tonne sales. So for FY '25-'26, if you can give some ballpark number, how much sales guidance we can expect or any idea about that?
See, as -- see, basically the customer in Bhilai will be stabilizing by that point of time. So we expect at least 1 million tonne more from '25-'26 onwards. And after that, Rourkela killer when it comes, so you can expect maybe from '26-'27 onwards, another 1 million tonne from there.
Means for FY '25, 1 million tonne addition and then '25-'26 onwards 1 million tonne addition. And this 3.5 million to 4 million tonne extra production...
See, '24-'25, we cannot have that because once the casters are there, it takes some time to stabilize and ramp up. So we'll not be getting that much production from there. But once it is stabilized and realized then in the year '25-'26 we can get 1 million tonne extra.
Okay. And all over, it will come from FY '26, not '25?
Yes. '26.
As there are no further questions, I now hand over the call to Mr. Ashish Kejriwal for closing comments. Over to you.
Thanks you. And thank you, everyone for attending the call and special thanks to the management for their insightful remarks over the company as well as the industry. So any closing remarks, sir, you want to give?
Yes, just 1 sentence, that the company remains committed towards improving operational efficiencies and with the market expected to be more benevolent in the coming quarters, I'm hopeful that the good times await us and our investors. Thank you.
Thank you. On behalf of Nuvama Wealth Management, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.