LTIMindtree Ltd
NSE:LTIM
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
4 593.55
6 738.45
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
LTIMindtree Ltd
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to LTIMindtree Q4 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Vinay Kalingara, Head, Investor Relations, LTIMindtree. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Viko. Good day, everyone, and welcome to the LTIMindtree Quarter 4 and FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. Today on the call, we have with us Mr. Debashis Chatterjee, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director; Mr. Sudhir Chaturvedi, President Markets; Mr. Nachiket Deshpande, Chief Operating Officer; Mr. Vinit Teredesai, Chief Financial Officer; and Mr. Vipul Chandra, Chief Financial Officer designate.
We will begin with a brief overview of the company's quarter 4 and FY '24 performance, after which we will open the floor for Q&A. During the call, we could make forward-looking statements. These statements consider the environment we see as of today and carry risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in today's call. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements made on this call.
I now turn over the call to DC for his opening remarks. Over to you.
Thank you, Vinay. Good evening and good morning to everyone on the call. Thank you for joining us today. Before I begin, I'm pleased to welcome Vipul Chandra as our new Chief Financial Officer. His extensive experience will be invaluable in steering our financial strategy towards continued success. I also want to extend my deepest gratitude to Vinit Teredesai for his outstanding contributions during his tenure. His dedication and leadership have been instrumental in the company's growth and financial health. We wish him the best in his future endeavors.
During FY '24, the economic landscape was marked by unprecedented uncertainty and caution. Despite these challenges, we closed FY '24 with a revenue of USD 4.3 billion, marking a 4.4% growth in U.S. dollar terms. Our dedication to align closely with clients' needs is mirrored in the significant order inflow recorded this year. We achieved a Q4 order inflow of USD 1.4 billion and a total FY '24 inflow of USD 5.6 billion, representing a 15.7% year-on-year growth. This demonstrates our ability to shift our portfolio from a relatively higher discretionary mix towards longer-term efficiency-driven deals.
We added 9 new Fortune 500 clients over the year, expanding our portfolio to 104. Additionally, in FY '24, the USD 1 million-plus client band has increased by 11 to 394 clients. The USD 5 million-plus client band increased by 7, USD 10 million-plus clients by 10. And our and our $20 million-plus clients have increased by 2. Our disciplined execution helped offset the impact of discretionary spend slowdown, driving growth across all our verticals year-on-year.
Our commitment to customer centricity is evidenced by our improved customer satisfaction score, which saw a 5-point increase from the previous year, surpassing industry averages. This quarter, we were honored to receive the Service Advocate of the Year award at the third annual Microsoft Supplier Prestige Awards.
While our performance is in line with how the industry has performed, it falls short of our aspirations. A marked reduction in discretionary spend, where our portfolio has traditionally been skewed, resulted in a higher-than-anticipated impact on revenue. Additionally, some of our top 40 customers experienced a decline in growth due to market dynamics and client-centric factors.
Despite these ongoing challenges, we have successfully capitalized on the emerging opportunities across verticals. Some of our recent key wins include, as part of a multiyear engagement, a leading financial services firm specializing in loans and mortgages has selected LTIMindtree as their primary engineering partner to meet their regulatory timeline and enable seamless operations of their application landscape through Remediation as a Service and Operations as a Service engagement.
A multinational financial services corporation has awarded LTIMindtree a multiyear contract as an exclusive assurance partner for their transformation journey by implementing a centralized quality engineering organization. A global leader in insurance brokerage services and risk management solutions has chosen LTIMindtree as their primary partner to establish a new technology platform as we create a new operating model in their digital transformation journey.
A leading energy company in the Middle East has awarded LTIMindtree and end-to-end infrastructure managed services contract for 5 years. A leading producer of frozen products in Sweden has awarded LTIMindtree with a full-scope infrastructure contract for cloud transformation. This is a new logo for LTIMindtree.
Our focused efforts in expanding our capabilities and account mining have resulted in substantial growth in 3 service lines, of which 2 have shown double-digit growth. Let me cite a few examples to showcase our increasing penetration through cross-selling into our existing accounts.
LTIMindtree has been chosen as the transformation partner to deploy its 4HANA solution for a global technology leader. This innovative software plus services engagement leverages our robust SAP capabilities. As a customer-experience partner for an automotive solutions major, LTIMindtree delivered a mobile application with a revamped user experience and user journey helping them move away from their current platform.
For our U.S.-based insurance and retirement major, LTIMindtree has been chosen as a transformation partner to modernize their hybrid cloud operations with a converged operations model through Canvas AIOps-driven automation and gen AI solutions to deliver 70% improvement in issue resolution and service experience.
In FY '24, LTIMindtree enhanced its partnerships through various initiatives, including co-branding, co-marketing and co-investments, focusing on key priority areas. Our joint venture with Aramco Digital is a notable example. This JV is a testament to our commitment to forge transformative partnerships. It broadens our geographical reach and opens new avenues for growth particularly in the thriving Saudi Arabian market.
The advent of gen AI and the potential it holds for transformative applications across industries is poised to revolutionize the way we approach problem-solving innovation and productivity. Our strategic partnerships with industry giants like Microsoft, AWS, Oracle, Snowflake and NVIDIA [ combined ] with our pioneering initiatives, including signing an MoU with Eurolife FFH to establish a first-of-a-kind gen AI and digital hub in Athens and dedicated facilities in Poland and Mumbai position us at the forefront of this revolution.
We are proud of our commitment to service excellence, which has been acknowledged by some of the most reputable global partners in the industry. We secured the 2024 Google Partner of the Year title for the Industry Solutions Services for Manufacturing. In addition, we were recognized as an Amazon Connect service delivery partner, highlighting our expertise in delivering top-notch customer service solutions.
Beyond these accolades, our commitment to sustainability and social responsibility remains a cornerstone of our business philosophy. As demonstrated by our recognition in various awards for sustainability, DEI and LGBTQ+ inclusion. Our success is attributable to the dedication, expertise and innovation of our 81,000 plus professionals. Their contributions have not only earned us recognition as a great place to work in multiple countries, but also laid the foundation for our future growth and innovation.
Regarding our industry verticals, we have renamed some of them. However, it is important to note that there have been no changes in the client distribution or the financials. All growth numbers for both the verticals and the geographies are on a full year basis. Banking, Financial Services & Insurance vertical declined by 2.8% on a quarter-over-quarter basis. This was primarily due to cancellation of 2 projects as clients reprioritize their spend. This also had an impact on the margins. However, on a yearly basis, our Banking, Financial Services & Insurance vertical grew 2.2%. Client priorities continue to revolve around regulatory commitment and data transformation for better reporting and decisions.
The renamed Technology, Media & Communications business grew 1.7%. While our strategic clients continue to do well, this vertical had a higher component of discretionary spend, and that played out throughout the year.
The Manufacturing & Resources business showed a strong growth of 14.6%. Demand was driven by ERP transformation, data estate modernization, supply chain modernization and Industry 4.0 initiatives. Our Retail, CPG & Travel, Transportation & Hospitality business now renamed as Consumer Business grew 2.3%. Our Health, Life Sciences and Public Services business grew 6.1% year-over-year.
In terms of geographies for the full year, North America grew 5.9%, Europe grew 3.5% and rest of the world declined by 3%. I will now turn over the call to Vinit for the financial highlights.
Thank you, DC. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining the call. Let me take you through the financial highlights for the fourth quarter and financial year 2024, starting with the revenue numbers. We ended the fiscal year 2024 with a revenue of USD 4.3 billion registering a growth of 4.4% in dollar terms. The corresponding constant currency growth was 4.2%. EBIT margin for FY '24 was 15.7% compared to 16.2% in FY '23. The absolute PAT for the full year was INR 4,585 crores, an increase of 4% over FY '23, while the PAT margin was 12.9% compared to 13.3% in FY '23. EPS for the full year was INR 154.90 compared to INR 149.10 in FY '23.
Cash generation for the year improved significantly in FY '24 with the operating cash flow to PAT at 123.7% compared to 70.2% in FY '23. Free cash flow to PAT came in at 105.5% compared to 49% last year. Given our continuing focus on operating efficiency and working capital, we expect our cash generation to remain strong going ahead.
For the fourth quarter of FY '24, our revenue stood at USD 1.07 billion up 1.1% year-on-year in USD terms. The corresponding constant currency growth was 1.2% year-on-year. Sequentially, revenue declined by 1.3% in dollar terms as well as in constant currency terms. EBIT margins for Q4 came in at 14.7% compared to 15.4% in the previous quarter. The key moving parts for the margin are 70 basis-points tailwind from the partial reversal of furloughs, higher working days and lower pass-through, offset by a headwind of 80 basis points from project cancellations. Higher SG&A and depreciation had a further impact of 60 basis points.
Supported by our healthy cash results, we realized the returns of INR 189 crores from our treasury operations. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 24% compared to 24.3% in Q3 of FY '24. PAT margin for the quarter was 12.4% as compared to 13% in Q3 of FY '24. Basic EPS was INR 37.20 for the quarter as compared to INR 39.50 in Q3 of FY '24.
Through our steadfast collection efforts, we have achieved further progress in reducing our DSO. Our billed DSO further reduced to 57 days versus 62 days in Q3. We have made a significant progress and have brought down the total DSO by 11 days during FY '24. In Q4, the total receivable days, including unbilled DSO was at 80 days, an improvement of 5 days sequentially. We continue to progress towards our aspiration of reducing the total DSO to about 75 days.
Our cash conversion metrics in Q4 continued to drive the strength of our balance sheet. The operating cash flow to PAT was at 158.4% as against 155.7% in the previous quarter, and 88.5% in the same quarter a year ago. Free cash flow to PAT conversion held its strong trend and came in at 131.5% compared to 143.7% last quarter and 77.7% in the same quarter a year ago. We hope to continue with this momentum going forward.
We closed the year with an all-time high cash and investment balance that stood at USD 1.38 billion or INR 11,525 crores compared to INR 10,116 crores in Q3 of FY '24. Return on equity for the quarter was at 25%. As of March 31, 2024, our cash flow hedges stood at -- sorry, USD 4,027 million and hedges on the balance sheet were USD 281 million.
In our endeavor to build bench strength, we reduced our utilization excluding trainees to 86.9%. Our attrition continues to be stable. For the quarter, our TTM attrition was at 14.4% compared to 14.2% last quarter. We onboarded another 500-plus freshers this quarter. The Board of Directors has recommended a final dividend of INR 45 per share, subject to shareholders' approval, taking our overall dividend for the full financial year to INR 65 per share.
Our ESG strategy continues to propel positive impact on society through our ongoing initiatives. For example, LTIMindtree scored 10 out of 10 in the Travel Smart Campaign 2024's annual ranking worldwide. We are placed amongst the top 25 leading global companies striving to reduce travel-related emissions sustainably. LTIMindtree has been selected as one of the 320 organizations from over 46 countries listed as early adopters of the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosure. LTIMindtree has scored an A- in the 2023 Climate Change ranking by Carbon Disclosure Project. Out of the 23,000-plus global companies, we are in the 5% that have made it to the global leadership league. These awards affirm our commitment to creating a sustainable future for all our stakeholders.
And finally, I want to express my deep gratitude to all of you for your unwavering support. It has been my utmost privilege to engage with all of you through the years. My best wishes to Vipul as he takes over as the CFO.
I now hand it back to DC for the business outlook.
Thank you, Vinit. This quarter was a one-off. We will return to growth in Q1. The positive outcomes of our positioning as an organization with scale, expanded capabilities and stronger partnerships continue to reflect in our order inflow and pipeline.
Through the year, we have devoted our portfolio to align with the current spend areas and are positioned well to capture the discretionary spend when it returns. We have entered FY '25 with a stronger foundation to drive the revenue synergies. As we reflect on our achievements and look to the future, we are confident that the insights we have gained and the strategies we have implemented will enable us to execute better. We are excited to see what the future holds and committed to making the most of every opportunity that comes our way.
With that, let me now open the floor for questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Nitin Padmanabhan from Investec.
I had a couple of questions. So one is, how are you looking at the discretionary spend environment and the BFSI portfolio as we look out into next year? So that's the first one.
The second is, how should we think about margins because even if I look at the current quarter, it looks like there are a couple of moving parts, which are -- which need some context. One is that the employee costs have gone up on an absolute basis despite headcount having come down. And there's also -- from a balance sheet perspective, it looks like the right of use assets has gone up by almost INR 600 crores sequentially. So just wanted some context on both these things, along with the broader view on discretionary BFSI and margins.
So as far as discretionary spend is concerned, at an overall level, I think there is still the same level of caution that we have seen in the last financial -- and -- but at the same time, we feel that we are well positioned in terms of the portfolio that we have, the capabilities that we have in terms of bouncing back as and when the discretionary opens up. But the short answer is there is still caution as far as discretionary spend is concerned, 80% of our deals that we are -- 80% of the pipeline that we have are still cost takeout, consolidation kind of opportunities.
As far as BFSI specifically is concerned. Again, it's continuing to be cautious owing to seasonal and macro uncertainties. There is a focus on regulatory and market compliance and then those things can get into a long-term transformation as well. And as we called out, there is a onetime impact of 80 basis points this quarter due to 2 project cancellations where clients reprioritize the spends.
In terms of margins, we had called out last quarter itself that we have to change the -- pause on the margin plan that we had, expansion plan. It does not mean that we don't want to get there. We still have a robust margin program in the organization. But given the fact that we did not see the revenue line coming the way we expected. We felt that it will not be appropriate to follow the margin plan because it will impact our growth.
But all that I can say is that over a period of time, we'll again get back to the same trajectory that we have, but it will take a while because we do feel that it's important to focus on the growth as well along with the margin. But I just want to give you the assurance that the margin is of paramount importance, and we have a plan in terms of focusing on the margin, which we will see as we go along.
And you want -- just to highlight one more thing is that as far as the margin program is concerned, this is kind of driven at the highest level in the organization. And in terms of the employee cost and the other question you had, I will request Vinit to answer.
Yes. So Nitin, as far as the employee cost is concerned, there have been 2 factors to it. One is the fact that there is a little bit of an uptick on the on-site headcount as a result of which there is a little bit of a higher cost. Secondly, the -- this is also a little bit of a seasonal effect of some of the benefits getting aligned at the on-site level at the beginning of the calendar year. So these are the 2 factors.
And third, we also need to remember at the end of the day, while the net headcount is coming down, the replacement headcount that comes into the organization doesn't come at the same cost. So there is a little bit of an inflationary pressure that always comes in. So that's the 3 factors that are basically driving down the employee cost on a higher side.
The next question is from the line of Sulabh Govila from Morgan Stanley.
My first question is on the deal wins. So this 3% Y-o-Y deal win number that we reported this quarter is a bit softer than a 20% growth that we've seen in the last 3 quarters. So is there a further change in the client behavior that you saw in this quarter? Or is it just a quarterly anomaly that will sort out over the next quarters?
And if you could also comment on -- given the divergence of deal wins and the revenue growth due to the changing nature of the deals that we are winning, at what growth levels do we think that -- of these deal wins, do we think that there could be some meaningful sequential growth that -- can report in revenue?
Sudhir, you take it. Sudhir?
Yes. So coming to the order inflow point, Sulabh. So if you look at it on a full year basis, right, we've touched $5.65 billion of order inflow, that's almost 16% up year-on-year. I think that's a better way to look at that number because this quarter -- Q3 is the quarter of renewals. So that's why it tends to be the higher quarter because most renewals happen in the October-to-December period.
I think the overall order inflow, if you see, it reflects a good mix, as DC said, of our pivot to having a much higher share of the efficiency level, cost takeout deals, which means that we have a more balanced portfolio of revenues to look forward to from both a good mix of discretionary and long-term efficiency-led revenues.
Understood. And at what point in time should we expect this divergence between deal wins and the revenue growth to sort out?
Yes. I think it is as the deal wins ramp up, as you can see the year -- the full year, we've announced over -- about 20-plus deals in this -- in the large-deal space. And with those, we are seeing them all ramp up by the new financial year. So Q1 onwards, we will see that coming through.
Okay. Okay. Understood. And my second question is with respect to the margin profile. I know you mentioned that the margin aspiration is sort of pushed out and given the softer growth in the near term, that looks difficult. But I just wanted to understand that from a Y-o-Y perspective, the outlook for FY '25 margins, could it be the case that they are similar or lower than F '24 numbers? Or do you think that is the number that you can maintain?
Go ahead Vinit.
Yes. So Sulabh, look at it, our aspirational margin of what we have laid down both at the time of merger as well as in the short-to-medium term, that continues. As the business environment and the growth comes back into action, I think so the margin will also continue to see an improvement. Right now, for FY -- we don't want to comment anything on FY '24 versus FY '25.
FY '24 was a year whereby there was a 4.4% growth. And comparatively, obviously, with the initial start-up impact of merger cost, et cetera, that were there, the margins had an impact. But as we get into FY '25, it's a business as usual, the growth, et cetera, as it returns back, you will also see an improvement in margins coming back. The long -- I just want to reiterate the fact the 17% to 18% target still remains the same, and our overall aspirational target, what we had laid out at the time of merger, also remains intact.
The next question is from the line of Manik Taneja from Axis Capital.
Just wanted to get your thoughts around...
Sir, your voice is not audible, sir, may I request to your use handset please.
I hope this is better. I hope this better.
Yes, Sir.
Just trying to prod you further on the Financial Services vertical performance in -- through the course of FY '24. What we have seen is that our revenues have come off through every single quarter, while in the current quarter, you highlighted the impact of 2 certain projects. But how should we be thinking about this particular vertical on a go-forward basis? Because in the past, you have talked about a certain consolidation deal wins in the industry and which should probably be helping your cost. That's question number one.
The second question was with regards to the High-Tech vertical. How should we be thinking about the fact that our top-line performance has extremely been good through the course of FY '24, while you've had challenges in -- at an industry level?
So Manik, as far as BFSI is concerned, we did have a onetime impact of -- due to 2 project cancellations where clients reprioritize their spends. And because it is one-off, there is nothing for us to believe that we don't get back into growth as we get into the Q1.
As far as High-Tech is concerned, I don't think -- the top line continues to grow as we have seen. And there is enough opportunities to leverage the expertise that we get with the top client then take it to the other clients. And that is something which is going on. And with that, we should be able to channelize the growth in High-Tech as well. So I don't think there is any reason for us to get worried about those 2 areas.
DC, my question was with regards to Financial Services through the course of the year. I do understand that this quarter, essentially, we had certain project cancellations. But Financial Services has been weak through the course of FY '24 every single quarter, and we have been talking about deal wins and consolidation wins for us, and that's the reason to essentially check with you on how should we be thinking about Financial Services growth in...
So I think I misunderstood your question. If you look at the Financial Services per se for the full FY '24, we have actually grown at 2.2%. So from an overall full year perspective, it has been a growth story for BFSI. And barring the impact that I talked about in Q4, I don't think there is any reason for us to believe that there is any specific softness. In fact, there is a lot of work that we do in the regulatory space, which still continues. Yes, discretionary spend is not yet back. But as and when it is back, it will only help us and benefit us in the long run.
Sure. And just wanted to get your thoughts around some of the leadership exits that we've seen at the company through the course of recent months, there was an indication that the organization was beginning to stabilize post the merger, but we've seen an increase in terms of recent exits. So how should one be reading this?
Well, I think the merger is pretty much behind us. As of first of April last year, it is LTIMindtree. And in any organization, you have exists as part of BAU. So I don't think we should read beyond that.
And please understand that when these 2 companies came together, we had significant leadership bandwidth. So essentially, in spite of whatever exit you have seen, we have been able to grow year-on-year basis, and there is a strong team on the ground, and we are very confident in terms of our future as well. So I don't think we should attribute this exit anything other than normal BAU, and we are well geared to deal with any of these changes.
Our next question is from the line of Ravi Menon from Macquarie.
As we look at LTI pre-merger, you used to have a seasonality in Q3 in Manufacturing, and we had thought as a combined company the seasonality should reduce. But this quarter, it looks like that's actually magnified. Could you explain a bit what happened in Manufacturing in this quarter?
Well, as far as Manufacturing is concerned, the seasonality that you saw in the last quarter -- and that continues. That is not -- there was a significant amount of pass-through, which was there in the -- in Q3, which was not there in Q4, and that is part of the manufacturing. So beyond that, I don't think there is any other factor.
And this quarter also...
And by the way, I mean just on a full year basis, if you again go to the FY '23 to FY '24, Manufacturing has grown almost 15% year-on-year.
This quarter, when you look at the growth across client tiers, except for the top 5, it looks like there has been a decline in the top 6 to 10, top 11 to 20 and beyond that as well. So is there a broad-based slowdown still happening? Are there -- are clients still cutting back on projects? Or do you think we are at the fag end of this?
So I think if I understood your question correctly, when we talk about the -- some of the pass-throughs that we had, that is kind of impacting the -- some of the clients in the 1 to 40 segment as well. But what you need to understand is that the top 40 has grown slightly higher than the overall company average for the full year. And we have pretty much seen growth across most of the 40 clients, top clients on a year-on-year basis. So I don't think there is any change to the strategy that we had, and our strategy has worked out fairly well.
Just a follow-up on that. This pass-through should have been for a very specific client or perhaps 2 clients at most, right? Because this is a seasonal thing, and we have that every Q3 with probably an Indian manufacturing client. But this is a slowdown that we see beyond that as well in each segment when we look at it individually, top 6 to 10 or top 11 to 20. And beyond that, we're seeing a Q-on-Q decline this quarter. So that's why I was wondering...
So I think there are 2 things. One is the pass-through is probably a few more clients rather than just 1 client. That's number one. And number 2 is that I don't think we should look at quarter-on-quarter. We should look at the overall year-on-year. And if you see the year-on-year data, it is looking pretty positive for us.
The next question is from the line of Vibhor Singhal from Nuvama Equities.
Two questions from my side. One question, DC, just wanted to check. As you rightly mentioned, our top clients have actually grown higher than the company average. And that's true for FY '24 as well as the last -- fourth quarter as well. So just wanted to pick it the other way around. I mean, the non -- I mean, the growth has actually been dragged by the long tail or, let's say, the remaining part of the client bucket. So I mean, what is it that we are seeing there, which is kind of making this revenue overall drag than the top 40?
I mean, I'm imagining that the top 40 clients' performance would have been impacted by the project cancellations you mentioned in Q4. But despite that, the non-top 40 clients, apart from, let's say, the discretionary spend that you mentioned, any other thing that you believe is impacting them? And do you see some of them reversing in the coming quarters? And then I have a follow for Vinit.
So Vibhor, as I said, I mean, if you look at the -- I don't want to kind of focus on quarter-on-quarter. But if I look at the overall full year picture, if I look at the year-on-year FY '23 vis-a-vis FY '24. The top client, the revenue contribution has actually increased slightly compared to last -- compared to FY '23. So I think our strategy of account mining and focusing on the top clients and focusing in terms of cross-sell, upsell, I think that is working out fairly well.
Now obviously, the macro conditions did not allow us to do anything more than what we could have done. But our strategy is pretty much in place, and we will continue with that strategy. And along with that strategy, if there is an opportunity for us to do a tail rationalization at some point of time, we will also do that. And the client base has also expanded. Each client base has also expanded each vertical has also grown. So let's look at those things -- aspect. I will let Sudhir also add on.
Just one point in terms of the program that we've been running in the company, the Focus 100 program that we talked about. So we've gradually rolled out that program. We began, as you can imagine, with the top 50 accounts. That was our first priority. Now we've rolled it across the 100.
And now as we have experience of rolling out the program, we will also now bring in the rest of the clients that we have, especially the $1 million-plus clients. I think we have 394 clients that are above $1 million. So we will use the best practices learned from this rollout to cover the rest of the accounts as well.
Got it. I just have one follow-up question for Vinit. So Vinit, think on the margins front, of course, this quarter, you mentioned the impact of one-off things and all. But first of all, are we looking -- I mean, what is the fresher-hiring target that we have for FY '25? And do you believe that could actually impact margins basically negatively in the near term, taking that into account and given that utilization is already 87%, what could be the incremental margin levers for you from current levels?
See, there is a senior-level margin improvement program that is being launched with multiple aspects of it and freshers is only a part of the strategy. As we have stated in the past, our pyramid rationalization, adding more people to the bottom level is something which we are doing. Secondly, in the current context, we are also working out on the right role, right pricing and the [ req ] programs, whereby the margin needs to be improved over a period of time. All those things are working on. And at this point of time, those are going to be our levers to which we will focus on.
The third important aspect is growth. At the end of the day, the growth will drive down the margins. We have well placed -- I don't think we need to make that much amount of investment on our SG&A. Our SG&A is much more stronger to bring -- to sort of support a larger growth that will be coming in. And that's how I will leave at that at this point of time.
The next question is from the line of Kawaljeet Saluja from Kotak Securities.
DC, my first question is for you. See, it does not look like in FY '25, your discretionary spending outlook would improve. So with that being the case, should your growth be similar to what you saw in FY '24, or are there any specific interventions that you have made in terms of cost takeout, deal participation, et cetera, which could change your growth outlook for FY '25 even in a challenging environment?
So Kawaljeet as far as the growth is concerned, I think the one thing which has happened in FY '23 is the deal profiles have changed significantly from a discretionary to more of cost takeout. And typically, what happens in this cost-takeout deals, they are multiyear. And initially, for the first couple of quarters, there is always some transition involved, et cetera. So the revenues normally kick in when you have kind of ramped up fully in those deals.
So there are quite a few deals in which we have completed the ramp up. Some of the ramp-ups were actually delayed as well. But the confidence that we have in terms of -- as I said in my opening remarks that we'll get -- this was a one-off quarter when we'll get back to growth. That confidence comes from the fact that many of those deals have kind of ramped up and we should -- the revenues should kick in.
Now if you look at the pipeline that we have, 80% of the deals in the pipeline are also very similar-in-nature deals. So which means that they need to be closed, they will have transition and then the revenues will ramp up. So the big positive is that there is a much more stickiness in terms of revenues as we go along.
So the discretionary situation has not changed significantly. And I don't think we can say that the discretionary situation is any different at this point of time, but it cannot be remaining forever. But we are well prepared to adapt to the scenario where discretionary spend comes back, and we should be able to leverage that as well. So that gives us the confidence of growth. But at this point of time, I'm not going to get into a comparison of growth. But definitely, we are on the right trajectory as a team.
Okay. That's helpful perspective, DC. The second question that I had is for Vinit. Vinit, this onetime impact of 80 basis points due to project cancellations, how does this play out? Was there a revenue reversal or was there basically transition costs that you were carrying, which you have written off? How will this show up in the P&L?
So basically, the project cancellation, we basically had anticipated that this revenue to sort of come in. And against that, we have done the ramp-up and allocation of people, we'll then translate it till almost -- by the end of the quarter.
And as a result of it, the impact on the P&L was felt, but the revenue -- P&L was felt to the revenue not coming in, but the cost continuing and the margins sort of getting impacted. Now these people have been sort of redeployed to the other projects. As -- [ when we'll talk back ] in Q1, you should start -- you should see a good amount of this returning back.
When you show the utilization number, it's adjusted for this or the utilization is on a gross basis, which is including the project cancellation resources and other resources which were used on programs which got eventually canceled?
As I see -- as I said, that till the fag end they were allocated. So for us, they were into that billable position. So for us, they were considered to be in utilization. We are not sort of -- adjusted the impact of that.
And Kawaljeet, I'll just add one point, [indiscernible] here. There is also -- these were sort of a software plus services type of projects. So there were some license write-off that was also involved. It was not just the headcount-related part. So you'll see that in both -- hence in the revenue and the margin.
Okay. That's helpful. And the third question and the final question that I had, Vinit, is on your hedges and ForEx income. Now I mean logically, the rupee has been stable. So rupee is stable. Normally, you end up booking your forward premium effectively, you end up realizing that into your P&L. But when I look at FX income for FY '24, actually, there was a ForEx loss, which seemed to be a little bit unusual because even now when you sell contracts in the forward market, you do get a premium on a 1-year, 2-year, 3-year basis. So what contributed to that ForEx loss when you look at FY '24 or rather negligible profit, ForEx gain as such. And should this number start normalizing as we move into the next year?
See, ForEx, the hedges, what we have and the impact what you see, these hedges have been taken over a period of time in the last 2, 3 years. We effectively run almost 3 to 5 years forward-looking hedging program. So these just have been taken at different points of time.
Secondly, while the ForEx from an average monthly perspective sort of doesn't show that much amount of volatility, the hedges get settled towards the fag end of the month, whereby there is a volatility, and that's where the sort of impact of the losses come in.
The third, hedging strategy is always supposed to balance out and not necessarily do reflect on our P&L as a gain or loss. We look at it as a balancing approach whereby on the one hand, we get a benefit of volatility on the rupee or an EBIT level, and that gets offset by the hedges that we take on. If that happens in synchronization, you will see absolutely a 0 impact on the P&L. But as I said, since the hedges -- the cost gets incurred on an average throughout the quarter, but it just gets settled towards the fag end of the quarter, and that's where the difference comes into play.
Vinit, what is the realization you're carrying for FY '25 book of forward contracts?
That's there in our OCI, if you'd see, it's...
That will be for a 3-year period, right...
Yes. So I won't specifically comment on it because the hedges, what we have today, plus we will be taking over a period of time depending upon how the ForEx movement happens.
The next question is from the line of Dipesh Mehta from Emkay Global.
A couple of questions. First, about the...
Sir, sorry to interrupt. May I request you to use your handset, sir, your audio slightly muffled, sir.
Is it better now?
Yes, sir, this is better.
Yes. Just want to get sense about the wage-ex cycle, if you can help us understand by when do we plan to give salary hike in this year? Second question is about utilization. What would be our comfort range in terms of utilization? We are currently closer to 87 percentage. So if you can give some sense about it because our headcount is -- continue to taper off, but we are expecting now growth trajectory to start from Q1 onwards. So if you can just help us understand how one should look at it?
And last question is about rest of world. Now one can understand about U.S., Europe, some kind of macro challenges impacting the performance. But for us, the rest of world, even if I look from a full year perspective, seems to be weak. So if you can provide some comment around it.
Okay. I'll let Nachiket start, and then I'll chime in as required.
So on the utilization front, I think, as we've said, 85% to 86% is our comfort zone, balancing sort of a growth and the efficiency ambition. So we are right now slightly higher than our comfort level. So as we see the growth coming up, we talked about Q1, you will see us -- that will probably end up taking utilization down by 50 to 100 basis points.
As far as our salary revision part is concerned. I think during the year, we do that on the basis of the competitiveness that we see in the marketplace, the individual performance and, of course, tenure of people in the company. Even this year, we'll go ahead with the similar approach in terms of how we roll out increments. The timing of that is -- we're still in the planning process to decide. But at the same time, we are on track to pay our bonuses. We do half-yearly bonus payout. We paid the first half on track, and we are on track to pay the remaining part of the bonuses also after the results.
And your -- as far as your question on ROW is concerned, the decline that you see in ROW is -- the only reason is that there was a significant pass-through that we had in Q3. And that is the only reason why we had a decline. But otherwise, we are still confident that the growth that we will be seeing should be broad based as we go along across geographies as well as verticals.
DC, I was referring from fiscal '24 perspective, not for Q4 perspective.
Yes, that's right. I mean we are -- the growth -- the degrowth that you see in terms of RWO is primarily because of a significant pass-through that we had in Q3. And some impact in Middle East as well in terms of some specific -- I think it is linked to the same BFS that we are talking about.
The next question is from the line of Mohit Jain from Anand Rathi.
Sir, 3 questions. One is on TCV. So if I adjust for the BFSI deal cancellation that you spoke about, our TCV growth for FY '24, is it still 15%? Or should we look at it say, 14% or 13%? That's the first question.
And the second is on CapEx. Like our CapEx is still high, while for the whole year employee addition is not there. So what should we expect there in FY '25? And third is on BFSI decline. Like can you share services growth in this segment for the quarter? Because last time you spoke about very high pass-through component in BFSI.
Sudhir, do you want to take the TCV?
Okay. So on the TCV point, we -- so the number we reported is net of the cancellations that DC spoke about. I'll just cover -- sorry, your BFSI question, do you mind repeating it?
So last quarter, you spoke about a significant pass-through portion in the BFSI segment revenue. Is it through now? The revenue number that I'm looking at 4Q FY '24, BFSI segment, is it services or what would be the services growth number for Q4 on a sequential basis?
Okay. So I think I'll ask Vinit also to add to this, but I don't believe there was a significant pass-through in BFSI in Q3. These 2 cancellations are primarily services. There's some other -- some license element, but it's primarily service.
So Mohit, I don't think so we ever said that there was a pass-through component in the BFSI per se alone. What we said was last quarter, we had a significant portion of pass-through and that was spread across all the verticals, including BFSI. But it's not that the BFSI was driving down the significant portion of cost. It was in the Manufacturing sector as earlier called out.
Manufacturing, sir, I'm aware of. So BFSI growth, whatever you have reported, that is the services growth for the quarter as well.
That's right. Absolutely. That's correct.
Okay. And the last one was on CapEx, like CapEx is still high for the year versus employee addition. So how should we look at it from an FY '25 standpoint?
See, last year, post -- after the pandemic breakout, you have seen that in the first 2 years, we have not spent on CapEx. As now people have -- we are asking people to partially return back to office, we had to create capacity because now we have people spread across multiple cities. So on an overall note, there is enough capacity in each individual cities, there is a deficit in certain cities, which we are sort of building out.
I think so for the next year to 2 years, you should anticipate that the CapEx will be on a higher side because we are building that CapEx from a forward-looking perspective at the same time also to bridge this deficit, whichever is there. On the other hand, we should also keep in mind that as we build some of these CapEx, there are certain lease cost also that will start up coming down as we start off surrendering some of these leases. So you have to look at that from a net-net perspective.
So the number you report in the cash flow statement, that is net only, right? Or will it be gross CapEx number?
It's a gross CapEx number. That -- that's why I said, we will incur CapEx in the next 1.5 years until we sort of build up the capacity and build that deficit that we have in certain cities.
Our next question is from the line of Sandeep Shah from Equirus Securities.
DC, in your opening remarks, you also alluded that apart from macro issues, there were some client-specific issue in the top 40 clients. So how many such clients you have faced the client-specific issue? And most of them are largely behind? Or do you still witness entering FY '25, especially if you can speak about the top line in the BFSI.
Yes. So I think the only thing we called out is the 2 clients, which we talked about or the 2 projects, I would say, not client, 2 projects in BFSI, which had the impact of -- the impact in terms of revenues reducing in BFSI. And apart from that, I can only say that some of the discretionary spend in the clients have declined, which we have been talking about for a while. The macro environment has not been the most conducive in terms of clients to get back on discretionary. And there has been also some in-sourcing that we have seen in the top 40 clients.
In spite of all these things, we still -- at an overall year-on-year basis, if I just look at FY '23 and FY '24, the top 40 clients still grew 4.5%, and which is in line with the overall organization growth. So overall, I think we are in a good place. In spite of so much of -- so many challenges, we still have managed to grow the top clients the way we wanted. And we are well positioned in terms of further growth as and when the discretionary comes back.
And just further to that, any outlook in terms of growth expectations from a top client in BFSI in FY '25?
Yes, I'll let Sudhir -- Sudhir?
So this -- so I think, Sandeep, we'll talk more about the overall BFSI level. So as DC mentioned, we -- see, we've been announcing deals at BFSI. In fact, even in this quarter, we had 2 large deals in the BFSI space. So -- and it's a good combination of cost reduction deals, plus some core transformation deals, especially in the payments platform transformation space or the lending platform transformation space. And we have a good pipeline in the existing accounts. We had a good new logo addition also that happened this quarter in BFSI and as I said, the large deal pipeline in BFSI continues to be strong.
So I think overall, BFSI, if I were to look at it from Q1 onwards, we should start to see a good return to growth, reflective of the work that has been done or the order intake that has been done in FY '24 and what we are seeing currently in the pipeline.
Okay. And just last few things. Just clarity on this 80-bps impact on the overall revenue because of project cancellation. Is it the revenue being reversed, which was booked in the quarters before fourth quarter or this was an anticipated incremental revenue to be booked in fourth quarter, which has not happened?
It was an anticipated revenue to be booked in Q4, nothing of the past quarter.
Okay. Okay. And this won't reoccur in the coming quarters, right? It's canceled?
No, yes.
And Vinit, last thing, we are exiting with an EBIT margin of 14.7%. The full year margin is 15.7%. The first quarter, we may have a headwind coming through visa and second quarter, if we give a wage hike, it will have an impact on the margin so earlier commentary about outlook to improve margin on a Y-o-Y, don't you believe it's a difficult task? Or we are expecting some tailwinds to emerge in the second half? And all the best Vinit and congratulations Vipul.
See, again, some of these costs, what you are talking about, visa, et cetera, are all planned cost. So there is no surprise on that in our planning exercise that has all been factored in. As I said, the most important factor that was -- there are 2 important factors that will play out in Q1. Some of these one-offs that we called out are not going to be there. And then the growth is the other aspect, which will sort of help us in terms of mitigating some of these headwinds. All that -- as far as growth comes in, all these will be taken care of.
The next question is from the line of Apurva Prasad from HDFC Securities.
So we did mention this in the call, of the change in the nature of deals that led to the disconnect between bookings and revenue growth. So my question really is that do you think the current levels of book-to-bill is adequate to accelerate growth? Or in your opinion, booking velocity needs to go up and improve from here?
Yes. So I think this -- the combination that we should look at is the book-to-bill, as I said, on a yearly basis, where it's the -- sorry, firstly, the order intake is up 16%. Even the book-to-bill is a healthy 16%, 17% above our quarterly revenue run rate. So I think that way we are fine.
The important thing is that we've -- the -- what you should look at is how we've grown all the pyramid. We've grown every bucket of the pyramid or every layer of the pyramid, we've added clients as well as grown across them. And I think that's what gives us that confidence, as DC has also been saying, about broad-based growth across verticals, across client buckets.
Yes, just wanted to clarify on this point. So what you're essentially indicating is that if the book-to-bill remains at these levels, you could potentially accelerate from the 4% growth rate?
Okay. Potentially, but a lot of it depends on market conditions. So we are -- see, it is still a cautious environment out there. The only thing is, as I said, we've built up a good order book, which is why we -- which we have confidence, which we know will flow into FY '25 revenues. Yes, thereafter, as the market conditions improve and if there is a return to discretionary spending, as we mentioned in our opening remarks, we will start to see an uptick.
Got it. And just finally on margins, is margin expansion for the year premised on growth acceleration? Or you do see that happening irrespective?
Well, I think -- this is DC here. See, margin is not a 1 quarter phenomena. I think if you talk about margin expansion, it has to be a discipline that you need to have within the organization, and we have done that in the past. And we would have done that in FY '23 as well, but it is also dependent on how the revenue line comes in. The reason why we changed the course because if you only focus on margin, then obviously, the top line also gets impacted. So we wanted to just take a pause. We are not -- we still have the program, which is running as far as the margin program is concerned, driven right from the top, I'm personally monitoring that program.
So margin is -- it has to be part of the hygiene, it has to be part of the discipline. It is just that given the current circumstances, we feel that whatever we had planned last year, that did not materialize but that does not mean that we are going away from the overall game plan that we had. So if it all goes fine, then you will actually see a little slow gradual uptick in terms of margin as we go along in this year as well.
The next question is from the line of Sudheer Guntupalli from Kotak Mahindra AMC.
Yes. DC, this is just a clarification on your earlier point that the leadership and sales attrition is just business as usual. So are you implying or sort of confirming that these exits are not costing us any growth because if macro and, let's say, the discretionary signs, where they are, if you look at it as a lowest common denominator for all companies, still, a company of our size should have grown a few percentage points higher than what we have delivered this year.
So is there a need to acknowledge that this attrition is costing us -- sales attrition, leadership attrition is costing us and this needs to be fixed immediately?
Well, the short answer is absolutely no because as I said, when we did the integration and past the integration whatever happened as of first of -- first week of April last year, we are pretty much done with the integration. So whatever has happened is all part of the BAU.
And the good news is that we had enough leadership bandwidth on both the erstwhile organizations, which is now combined together. So I can assure you that whatever you see in terms of the organization in FY '24, it is more the macro and the overall scenario that we have seen, but it has got nothing to do with the leadership attrition. And whatever we talk about attrition as we go forward, it's part of BAU, which is absolutely normal.
The next question is from the line of Ashwin Mehta from AMBIT Capital Private Limited.
Two questions. So DC, as we look to chase growth, do we need to relax some of our operating parameters like we run at almost the highest offshore effort at around 85%. Our SG&A levels are more like 12.5%, which is towards your historical lows. So do you need to invest here? And thirdly, in terms of utilizations, do we need to take them down?
And the second question is around the right of use assets. What has driven the more than 40% sequential increase in terms of the right of use assets?
The second one, you answer that -- so as far as chasing growth is concerned. Look, I mean, utilization where it is right now, I think Nachiket has alluded to it. Our healthy utilization range is 85% to 86%, in that range. And even the -- and as we get on with growth, we are always willing to get the hiring engine pumped up. And at this point of time, it is not a difficult situation for us to ramp up faster if you need to. So given all these conditions, all this criteria, I don't think there is any problem from our perspective in terms of the overall operating model, which will help us to chase growth.
And there are -- and also, when you talk about and if you look at FY '24 when we talked about that we want to just slow down on the margin goals. The idea was exactly what you were talking about. Idea was that let's look at what we have. And we don't want to take margin up just like that unless we also can grow the top line. So we are now already in a situation where we are confident about the growth. And even you have to accelerate growth, if the discretionary comes back, we should be able to do that in the current scheme of things. Nachiket, do you want to add anything?
And in terms of the offshore on-site efforts you asked, we don't target a particular number. It's not a sort of a margin lever for us. It's a reflection of the nature of the work and the kind of deals that we have with the customers. So it's not that we are targeting a particular number there.
And your second question on the right to use. It's basically the -- it's related to the CapEx question which was asked earlier. It is basically a capitalization of 2 leased through -- our properties that we have recently got into our portfolio, and that's the reason of that jump.
Okay. And just a follow-up to what Nachiket mentioned. So in terms of our deal pipeline, which is skewed towards more cost takeout kind of deals. Is there more people or asset takeover involved in terms of deals versus what we would have done in the past?
So not all deals have that asset takeover or people takeover component. Some deals do. So we -- and we continue to be cautious about the kind of deals that we want to get in from a longer-term perspective and the margin impact of that and the -- and so on and so forth. So there is -- that our strategy remains the same that it was in the past as well.
And as far as the offshore effort part is concerned, I think that is a reflection of the type of deals that we are talking about. Typically, multiyear long-term cost takeout deals tend to have higher offshore leverage as well. Hence, you see the [ effects ] mix in the way you see it.
The next question is from the line of Apurva Prasad from HDFC Securities.
On BFSI, the 2 deals that were mentioned, is that restricted to the top account? Or is it beyond that?
Okay. So it is beyond that. I think folks, please look at it as 2 isolated projects. Which were closed within the quarter, and there is no impact going forward for it, yes. So we're going back to the answer that I gave you regarding the order intake that we already have in BFSI, the wins that we have and the pipeline that we have, and that gives us the confidence of how we see it returning to growth in Q1.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question. On behalf of LTIMindtree, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.