LTIMindtree Ltd
NSE:LTIM
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
|
US |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
4 593.55
6 738.45
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US | |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q3-2024 Analysis
LTIMindtree Ltd
In the recent quarter, the company has made strides in improving financial health, evidenced by a reduction in total receivable days to 85 from 94 in the previous quarter, signaling better cash management and collection efforts. This is further demonstrated by the operating cash flow to profit after tax (PAT) ratio, reaching a record 155.7%, indicating that the company is generating more operating cash flow relative to its net income.
The company's cash and investment balances have grown significantly, standing at USD 1.216 billion, up from the previous quarter, showcasing a strong liquidity position. Such financial strength provides the company with the stability to weather economic uncertainties and invest in future growth.
The company is keen on nurturing new talent, adding over 500 freshers this quarter, adapting to market conditions by planning hiring on a real-time basis. This approach ensures that the company remains agile and can quickly respond to changes in supply and demand in the labor market.
LTIMindtree's installation of solar power cold storage units and achievement of LEED Platinum certification for its campus signify a strong commitment to sustainability. Winning the Golden Peacock Award for sustainability efforts reaffirms the company's dedication to creating a positive environmental and social impact.
The company anticipates Q4 performance to mirror the current quarter's, given the cautionary business environment where client spending is contained. Despite these challenges, the company maintains a solid order inflow and pipeline promising medium-term growth. However, the goal to achieve a 17% to 18% exit margin is deferred due to necessary investments in capturing growth opportunities.
The macroeconomic environment remains challenging, with client decision-making delays and budget freezes yet to be completed, making planning difficult. These headwinds influence the company's outlook but do not obscure its focus on becoming the preferred partner for clients, as demonstrated by a 30% increase in the deal pipeline to $4.6 billion and participation in over 30 advisory deals.
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to LTIMindtree Limited Q3 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Vinay Kalingara, Head Investor Relations, LTIMindtree. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Nirav. Good day, everyone, and welcome to the LTIMindtree Quarter 3 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. Today on the call, we have with us Mr. Debashis Chatterjee, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director; Mr. Sudhir Chaturvedi, President, Markets; Mr. Nachiket Deshpande, Chief Operating Officer; and Mr. Vinit Teredesai, Chief Financial Officer. We will begin with a brief overview of the company's quarter 3 performance, after which we will open the floor for Q&A.
During the call, we could make forward-looking statements. These statements consider the environment we see as of today and carry risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in today's call. We do not undertake to update any forward-looking statements made on this call.
I'll now turn the call over to DC for his opening remarks.
Thank you, Vinay. Good evening and good morning to everyone on the call. Thank you for joining us today. I wish you all a very happy New Year. As we mark the 1-year anniversary of LTIMindtree, I'm proud to share that LTIMindtree has been named a Global Future 50 company by Fortune Magazine in its latest edition. What makes this achievement even more special is that LTIMindtree is the only IT services company to feature in the Future 50 list of global companies. I would like to acknowledge the dedication and hard work of all our associates that led to this recognition.
In terms of our performance, we observed a higher level of seasonality during the quarter along with an unchanged macro and demand environment. While we had expected the furloughs to be above average, they ended up being higher, both in terms of their degree and extent of impact. Despite these challenges, we delivered a resilient performance this quarter and achieved our highest ever order bookings.
Our revenues came in at USD 1.08 billion, which marks a year-over-year growth of 3.5% in U.S. dollar terms and 3.1% in constant currency. Our sequential revenue growth in U.S. dollar terms was 0.8% and in constant currency was 0.7%. The sequential trajectory reflected the broad-based impact of furloughs across all verticals. Our manufacturing vertical saw a strong 20.1% year-over-year growth. Our EBIT margin for the quarter came in at 15.4%, while the net profit margin was 13%. We recorded a strong order inflow of USD 1.5 billion, registering a growth of 21% year-on-year despite the unchanged cautionary environment. With this, our 9-month FY '24 order inflow stands at USD 4.2 billion, a 19% growth year-over-year. Our strong order inflow reflects the increase in relevance and strength of our H2 experience capabilities across all markets.
During the quarter, we added 23 new clients and increased our count of USD 10 million-plus clients by 8 year-over-year. Our USD 20 million-plus clients have increased by 3 and our USD 50 million-plus clients have increased by 1. Furthermore, our USD 1 million-plus client band has now got 388 clients, an increase of 14 clients on a year-over-year basis.
Let me now turn on to our industry verticals. Our Banking, Financial Services & Insurance vertical declined 1.4% year-over-year due to higher furloughs. This vertical continues to show a cautionary approach towards new spend. Our Hi-Tech, Media & Entertainment business grew 0.3% year-over-year despite the impact of greater-than-anticipated furloughs. This vertical remains resilient for us.
The Manufacturing & Resources business showed a strong growth of 20.1% year-over-year due to the seasonal higher pass-through. In the Energy & Utilities vertical, we have capitalized on opportunities arising from consolidation and secured a significant deal for transformation and supply consolidation during this quarter.
Our Retail, CPG and Travel, Transportation and Hospitality business grew 0.6% year-over-year. In the Retail and CPG vertical, businesses are focused on optimizing their costs by consolidating suppliers and leveraging automation technologies. Within the Travel, Transport and Hospitality vertical, we are seeing demand for our services related to data.
Our Health, Life Sciences and Public Services business grew by 6% year-over-year. LTIMindtree was recognized as a major contender in Everest Group's Health Care Digital Payer Services PEAK Assessment 2023.
In terms of geographies, North America contributed 72.7%, Europe contributed 14.5%, and Rest of the World contributed 12.8% of our revenue during the quarter. Our North America market saw a year-over-year growth of 4.1%. The demand environment remains cautionary. What remains unchanged is the prioritization of spend focused on cost efficiency and transformation projects with a clear return on investment. We have observed clients using supplier consolidation as a lever to achieve their objectives and are reaping the benefits of this approach as some of this consolidation is being directed towards our company.
I would like to call out a few important deals that we signed this quarter. Our U.S.-based premier oil and gas producers selected LTIMindtree as their strategic partner for end-to-end technology services. As part of the partnership, LTIMindtree will provide services across several value-based portfolios, covering digital solutions, platforms and operations. A global leader in the design, engineering and delivery of customized facilities for high-tech industries has selected LTIMindtree as their preferred strategic partner for their digital transformation journey over the next 5 years. LTIMindtree will drive transformation across the technology landscape through multiple services, including cloud migration, end user services, security and application development and support. A diversified multinational mass media corporation has chosen LTIMindtree as their preferred ServiceNow transformation partner. This engagement will help unlock the value of their ServiceNow investments, improve ROI and drive cost efficiency.
A leading U.S.-based energy producer has expanded its infrastructure managed services scope with LTIMindtree. A global financial services technology company has chosen LTIMindtree for its product development initiatives. A utilities company in the Middle East continues to strengthen its relationship with LTIMindtree by signing another 3-year agreement with -- where LTIMindtree will support its transformation journey by identifying areas of expansion and optimizing the technology landscape.
We are now participating across broader areas of customer spread. For example, we are working with McAfee, a worldwide leader in online protection, as a preferred and strategic partner for their transformation initiatives across products, IT and commerce divisions. As part of this partnership, LTIMindtree will be providing engineering services and operations support at a global scale, helping McAfee drive cost efficiencies, agility and innovation and product delivery. We recently announced the amalgamation of LTIMindtree subsidiaries, Syncordis and N+P to form a specialized banking transformation practice. This practice will focus on delivering end-to-end consulting, digital and IT services to banks and capital market firms.
With digital transformation emerging as the cornerstone of competitive advantage and sustainable growth in today's business landscape, our partners and customers continue to actively explore and invest in AI-led opportunities. To fully capitalize on this opportunity, we have set up a new service line called Enterprise AI. This service line will enable us to create cohesive and comprehensive Al-first strategies by bringing generative-AI interventions into all our service lines and across 4 customer priority areas: foundation, core, innovation and experience. We have also trained over 10,000 employees on GenAI to stay ahead in this ever-evolving AI landscape. I will now turn the call over to Vinit for Q3 financial highlights. Vinit?
Thank you, DC. Hello, everyone, and I wish you all a Happy New Year. I will now take you through the financial highlights for Q3 FY '24, starting with the headline numbers. Our revenue stood at $1.08 billion, up 0.8% sequentially and up 3.5% on a year-on-year basis. The corresponding constant currency growth was 0.7% quarter-on-quarter and 3.1% year-on-year. Our EBIT margin came in at 15.4% compared to 16% in the previous quarter. The key moving parts for the margin decline are 200 basis points owing to higher furloughs, lower working days and seasonal pass-through revenue. This was offset by 80 basis points improvement from SG&A and 60 basis points from operating efficiencies.
Despite significant cash outflow due to dividend payments and midyear incentives, our cash and investment balances crossed the INR 10,000 crores mark and we had a strong treasury income of INR 151 crores. The effective tax rate for the quarter was 24.3% compared to 23.5% in Q2 of FY '24. PAT margin for the quarter was stable at 13%. Basic EPS was INR 39.50 for the quarter as compared to INR 39.30 Q2 of FY '24.
We continue to make significant improvements to the fundamentals of our invoicing and collections. For quarter 3, the total receivable days, including the unbilled DSO was 85 days compared to 94 days last quarter. You may recollect that we had -- we significantly improved our unbilled DSO last quarter as well. In Q3, we further reduced our unbilled DSO by 3 days. The unbilled DSO in Q3 is 23 days versus 26 days in Q2. With our focus on collections, the billed DSO reduced to 62 days versus 68 days in Q2. Going forward, we aspire to continue this momentum and bring the total DSO closer to 75 days.
We had a significant improvement in our cash conversion metrics in Q3. The operating cash flow to PAT was 155.7% this quarter on account of strong collections as against 92.1% in the previous quarter and 65.8% in the same quarter a year ago. Furthermore, free cash flow to PAT has shown a strong improvement to 143.7% compared to 75.1% last quarter and 35.6% in the same quarter a year ago. I'm proud to note that our OCF and FCF conversion figures are the highest ever and have crossed 100% for the first time. We hope to continue this momentum.
We closed the quarter with significantly higher cash and investment balances that stood at USD 1.216 billion or INR 10,115 crores compared to INR 8,947 crores in Q2 of FY '24. Return on equity for the quarter was steady at 26.6%. As of December 31, 2023, our cash flow hedges stood at USD 3,687 million, and hedges on the balance sheet was USD 295 million. Our utilization, excluding trainees, further improved to 87.4% compared to 86.6% in the previous quarter because of the pickup and availability. Our attrition continues to be stable. For the quarter, our LTM attrition was 14.2%, down from 15.2% last quarter. We added more than 500 freshers this quarter. With the supply side easing up, we continue to plan hiring on a relatively real-time basis.
Creating meaningful change forms the foundation of our CSR strategy, and we continue to positively impact our society through our CSR initiatives. For example, LTIMindtree has installed a solar power cold storage unit in Karnataka with a substantial capacity of 5 metric tons. We are committed to installing 12 solar power cold storage units, each with 10 metric ton capacity in various rural locations across India. Our Mahape campus in Mumbai has received LEED Platinum certification from USGBC, making it a part of select group of sustainable and innovative LEED certified buildings. We are pleased to announce that LTIMindtree won the prestigious Golden Peacock Award in 2023 for its exceptional sustainability efforts. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has conferred LTIMindtree, a special recognition for gender equality and presented a Silver Shield towards Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting Leadership for FY '23. These awards affirm our stakeholder engagement and commitment to environmental and social impact.
I now hand it back to DC for the business outlook.
Thank you, Vinit. Against the backdrop of a continued challenging macroeconomic environment and delays in client decision-making, we expect Q4 performance to remain similar to the current quarter. In this environment of restrained client spending, we continue to expand our value proposition to become a partner of choice for our clients. Despite experiencing higher-than-anticipated seasonality in Q3, our strong order inflow and healthy deal pipeline set the stage for our medium-term growth. While our margin optimization program continues, we remain committed to investing appropriately to capture growth opportunities, because of which our aspiration of a 17% to 18% exit margin will get pushed out by a few quarters. With that, let me open the floor for questions.
[Operator Instructions] First question is from line of Sulabh from Morgan Stanley.
So my first question is on the near term, as you mentioned about 4Q growth rates being similar to 3Q. So just trying to understand that -- what is primarily leading to a continuing softness in 4Q given that one would have imagined that these larger furloughs and deeper furloughs would have reversed in 4Q and given you a reasonably strong 4Q? I just wanted to understand what are the moving parts there?
Yes. So essentially, as far as the fourth quarter is concerned, at this point of time, our thinking is that -- some of the furloughs will come back, but not all the furloughs will come back. They will be coming back gradually. So essentially, the recovery will be gradual. And we will continue to have a bit of a pass-through in the next quarter as well. But it's pretty much the furloughs, which -- and overall, as I said, the environment is fairly cautionary, and we have to still wait and see how the macro plays out because at this point of time, there is a delay in decision-making which was there earlier also and that continues to go on as we speak. And even as we work with our clients in terms of their budgets, a lot of clients have still not frozen their budgets, still their plans are also in a plus, which kind of makes our planning also very difficult. So those are some of the things that's kind of making us feel that Q4 will be as -- will be very similar to Q3.
Understood. Understood. And my second question is with respect to the sales activity on the ground. So it's been a year since the time we started operating as a combined entity. So just wanted to get some context as to now are we able to target larger size deals related to the past? And how many such deals do we have in the pipeline? And how have been our win rates on such deals versus company average? So just wanted to understand how the merger has panned out versus from a revenue synergy perspective?
Yes, I will request Sudhir to answer. But before that, the short answer is that we'll appreciate the fact that when the merger was announced, we were very keen to integrate our capabilities in a very short time frame. So we actually got the merger completed in a very, very short time frame to capture the market opportunities. Unfortunately, we never expected the macros to play so heavily in terms of not being conducive to the situation that we are expecting. But in terms of overall cross-selling and upselling opportunities that we got or getting a seat on the table because of our size and scale, I think all those things have worked out fairly well. So let me request Sudhir to add more color.
Sure. Thanks, DC. Yes, as DC mentioned, what we've seen is a very significant uptick in our large deal overall pipeline. So our overall pipeline currently is around $4.6 billion, and it's about 30% up from the same time last year. So that merger thesis has certainly played out well. And the other metric that I'll share with you is that the number of advice deals is very, very significant. We are participating in almost 30-plus advice deals right now, which means that deal advisers are seeing us clearly as a -- I think what we're seeing in the market as the best possible alternative to some of the larger players in the sector. So that part is certainly playing out, and it's also playing out in our order book, as you've seen, right? This quarter also, we've recorded $1.5 billion order book, which is on the back of the deal wins, some of which were also mentioned in DC's opening remarks. Okay. And then yes, just -- service line, I'll just say that we are seeing strong growth in our ERP service line. It's been a traditional strength of LTIMindtree, and we're beginning to -- we are continuing to see strong momentum there as people look for core modernization related work and that the other part of the large deal portfolio also that we are seeing.
Sulabh, I request you to come back in the question queue for a follow-up question. Next question is from the line of Ravi Menon from Macquarie.
DC, you mentioned that next quarter 2, we might have a little bit of a pass-through. So would much of this go away then? And should we think about this as a headwind for revenue in Q4?
No, I think what I said is we had higher than usual pass-through. But if you look at our overall -- if you look at the last financial year, there was a pass-through, which is seasonal with respect to Q4. I think it will be similar in line with whatever we saw in Q4 of last financial year.
And this quarter, it looks like there is a significant element of pass-through because we're looking at your segment margin for Manufacturing & Resources. That seems to be actively flat Q-on-Q the segment profit, while revenue is up. So should we think about this going away next quarter?
Ravi, this is Vinit. So the pass-through revenue, you -- seasonally, it was always there in the second half. This year, we had a slightly higher number in Q3. Q4, you will see a little bit, again, on a similar ground, a little bit of a higher pass-through than what you have seen traditionally. But yes, by -- we are not right now looking and talking about the Q1 of FY '25. At the time, we will have some other levers to offset this headwind that will be coming.
Next question is from the line of Nitin Padmanabhan from Investec.
So with reference to the headwinds that we're facing, if you could give us some context on which verticals are really seeing this extended pain because some of our peers have actually called out maybe bottoming out on BFSI and so on and so forth. So just wanted your thoughts on those verticals and how things have evolved. And what's really caused the pain going to next quarter?
So first of all, rather than calling out vertical, it's always a reflection of the clients that we manage in our portfolio. And of course, as we called out, we did see a decline in BFSI. And I would say though the insurance part of the portfolio has been resilient, but we did have some challenges in BFS, and it's again the higher the furloughs. And we expect that some of the furloughs will be gradually coming back as we get into the next quarter. But overall, in terms of -- if you ask me where do we see growth? The growth will be fairly broad-based across industries and geos, because I don't think there is anything for us to call out saying that only 1 vertical will grow because we are anyway focused on very limited set of industry verticals, limited geographies, and we feel that the growth when it comes back, it will be kind of broad-based.
Sure. So what was a little unclear about is that some of the furloughs will sort of recover. And we will also see -- we've had pretty strong seasons over the last 4 quarters consistently. So when that happens and our pass-through is -- will also continue. What is the big drag is what I'm unable to understand. Is it very broad-based drag? Or is it specific to any specific area?
So Nitin, this is Vinit. The furloughs, what we are talking about is that the furloughs will return back, but not necessarily all the furloughs will return back from Jan 1. They will come back gradually. So that's the one part of it. Secondly, the pass-through revenue is a seasonal component, but this is also part and parcel of some of the ramp-ups that are happening as a part and parcel of the deals that we have signed in the past. Eventually, these deals will see -- this pass-through revenue will go away in Q1. But at that point of time, our other services revenue, et cetera, will return back to offset that.
Perfect. Perfect. And just last question for you, Vinit. On margin, how are you thinking about it at this point in time versus the earlier target? Is there a new thought process or a thing in mind? And is this delayed primarily because of the weakness that you're seeing that's sort of hurting? So would it mean that maybe Q1 you have salary increases. But -- so just wanted your thoughts broadly on margin.
So this is DC. So let me just explain to you our thought process on margin. See, when we got these 2 companies together, we pretty much focused on our margin expansion plan. And when you create a margin plan, it is also linked to the overall top line that you expect, the revenues that you expect to kick in. So margin plan doesn't work in isolation without having a top line and also certain levers that we apply to get to a margin target. So we were -- and also, if you look at it, our utilization has also gone up fairly significantly. And I don't think it is healthy for us to take the utilization any further. So keeping all these things in mind, we feel that at some point of time when the recovery does take place, we should be -- because of the fact that the order book is so strong, we have been also part of some vendor consolidation. So keeping all these things in mind, we need to keep on reinvesting back into the business. And if we do that, we have to kind of chase the margin target maybe a few quarters down the line. So essentially, at this point of time, what I can say is our margin program that we have put in place, I don't think that's going to change. That's remaining intact, but only the targets that we had set, we will probably delay that -- defer that a little bit, maybe a few quarters. But in that process, during those quarters, we want to reinvest back into the business, keeping in mind that the order inflow is very strong and we need to do some investments in terms of either SG&A or bench, et cetera. So we need to -- we want to focus on that and want to be ready for anything that happens in terms of growth, we should be able to stay ahead of the curve. I mean, if you have looked at the commentary -- listen to the commentary that we have made, I mean, we have set a target. We have set a target that we will be training across section of our associates in terms of GenAI. And we have set a target of 10,000. And I think we have made that target. So our investments will continue. We want to double down on some of the investments even further. And that's why we feel that it is appropriate for us to defer the margin program by a few quarters, but that doesn't mean that we are going away from the overall margin program that we have already embarked on. Does that make sense?
Yes, yes, absolutely. That's very helpful context.
Next question is from the line of Manik Taneja from Axis Capital.
Just wanted to prod you further with regards to your outlook. When you -- when you spoke in October, you were very confident about the deal ramp-ups helping us grow strongly in both...
Manik, sorry to interrupt you. Your audio is not coming clear. Can you please speak through the handset?
Yes, I'm speaking on the handset. Is this better now?
Sir, your voice is still echoing.
Any improvement now?
Slightly better?
Yes. So my question was with regards to the outlook that you've provided in the month of October, then you were very confident about a strong second half led by the deal ramp-ups helping our performance. What changed between then and now? Is -- have you had some negative surprises with some of these deal ramp ups? That's question number one. The second question was more from a longer-term standpoint when the 2 companies came together. The -- merger rationale was that you would be able to expedite growth and grow faster than each of the individual companies. But when we look at our growth performance now compared to some of our Tier 2 peers, we have seen a much sharper moderation. So what's driving that, if you could delve into that as well?
Yes. So I think first of all, if you compare our growth, et cetera, we should compare with some of the larger peers because we are a much larger company. I mean, I'm probably answering your second question first. But in terms of the deal ramp-ups that we have -- the deals that we have closed, the ramp-ups are happening well on track, maybe a little slower than we expected, but still the new deals, the ramp-up is happening. I don't think there is any issue with that. But where we have a challenge is some of the portfolio that we had, which was more of discretionary, those portfolios, as they have ramped down, I don't think they have been able to -- they did not really ramp up at the same pace. Now like, for example, we expected furloughs in Q3, but we did not expect that the furloughs will be deeper as well as wider. In fact, there are industries where we did not have furloughs before, but like oil and gas, for example, we don't have -- we never used to have furloughs, but even they also went through furloughs. So -- having said that, some of the decision-making is still pending. Some of the deals which are in the final stage, the decisions are still pending, so we expect those decisions any time. So long story short, I think the furloughs are much more -- much deeper and wider. The deals which we have closed are ramping up fairly well, the new deals. But some of the discretionary spend that we have in having -- we did have in some of the accounts, that thing is not really coming back because that's where we kind of had a challenge.
Next question is from the line of Mohit Jain from Anand Rathi.
Sir, one is a follow-up to the previous one on furloughs. So we do not have much decline, so to say, in BFSI, which used to be into furloughs higher than other verticals. And second -- on the North American side as well. So is this more specific to like Europe where you have declined more and retail? Or do you think it has more to do with BFSI and, say, U.S....
Yes. So BFSI did have furloughs. It is -- but it is probably -- it is offset by the pass-through that we had. In fact, we had some additional pass-through in that vertical, which is offsetting -- the impact of furloughs is turning out to be smaller because of that reason.
So we used to have pass-through in manufacturing, right? Or this time, is it in BFSI?
It's both.
Okay. So what has been like services decline for BFSI on a like-for-like basis because we are looking at Y-o-Y and Q2 numbers. Does it look like there's a big decline?
No, we don't call that out. But at an overall level, I think we know that BFSI -- as I said, BFSI has been under a bit of stress, and insurance portion of the portfolio have been quite resilient. And again, it's a portfolio of clients that we manage in a particular vertical, and that's where -- that's how we look at it. But over a period of time, I'm sure it will all recover.
And your commentary on BFSI is not changing for the fourth quarter, right? You're saying the weakness may persist.
Yes, that's right.
Okay. And second for Sudhir, the TCV growth, we are now maintaining 20% for a few quarters, and you spoke about that order -- not backlog, the deal pipeline number, $4.6 billion. Should we expect this TCV growth to continue now that we have more number of deals, et cetera, for signing?
No, as I mentioned, right? We have a good pipeline, good deal momentum. In fact, we have several ideas in their final stages of closure that we are seeing. We are seeing some delays in decision-making in deals, but the closures are still continuing to happen. So I think based on all of those, we are seeing that the order intake that we've been announcing will continue to maintain that momentum. So that will continue as planned.
Right. And is there any revised margin guidance, like by when do you guys expect to get back to the previous guidance of Q4? Like...
No, as I said, I mean, our overall margin program is not going to change, but we just want to ensure that we don't get -- given where we are, given the overbearing macroeconomic situation, as we explained, we don't want to be short-sighted and forget about investing. So I think it's a conscious decision that we will -- we have taken to kind of get back on track after a few quarters. But in the meantime, reinvest back into the business so that we can be ready for capturing any of the opportunities that comes when the market opens up because there is a lot of investment that we need to do on the business also.
So on a net basis, we should expect it to be like 15%, 16% in the near term?
Well, we are not saying that. But in the longer term, the 17% to 18% target that we have, that is still something that we'll chase in the longer term after a few quarters.
Next question is from the line of Vibhor Singhal from Nuvama.
So 2 questions from my side. DC, if I keep this -- the performance of Q3 and Q4, which was marked by the higher furloughs that you're expecting in Q4. If you keep that aside, given that our deal flows have been quite strong, 20% Y-on-Y for the last couple of quarters itself. Do you expect the execution of these deals to pick up at some time in FY '25? I mean a lot of our peers have commented that -- a larger peer commented that BFSI has bottomed out for them. Another large peer commented that they're seeing green shoots in discretionary spend. So we know there has been a delay in decision-making and these things converting into revenue. But do you see those picking up somewhere in FY '25, leading to some good growth momentum for us in that year?
Well, I think if you look at the nature of the deals, bulk of our deals that we have closed and even the pipeline that we have, most of the deals are efficiency-led cost takeout kind of deal. And if you look at the nature of these deals, they do take a longer cycle time for closure. And on top of that, we also have delayed decision-making. And when they close, these deals are typically multiyear, but they also involved, in most of the cases, some kind of a transition. So keeping all these things in mind, we knew we anticipated that some of these deals will kind of ramp up over a period of time. So there is no reason for us to believe that the ramp-ups won't happen in these deals, whichever we have closed because these are mostly efficiency-led deals. So -- and this is across the -- across all the sectors. It's not just 1 particular vertical. It's pretty broad-based. So to answer -- the short answer is this, over a period of time, these deals will all ramp up. You want to add anything?
I think just to add to that, right, the combination of these deals, which are -- so the good thing is these are multiyear deals. So we will get the benefit of this over a longer period of time as they start to ramp up. the ramp-ups are happening gradually. And at the same time, the discretionary spend is lower to -- has stopped in several industries. So which is why our discretionary book is not getting refreshed as before. So hence, the reliance more on these longer-term cost takeout deals for growth. But again, not a cause of concern because we have a significant pipeline for that, and we'll continue to build on that, as you can see with the order inflow, and we feel that we can continue -- we know we'll continue with that in Q4 as well. So we'll build that growth momentum over a period of time.
Got it. Got it. My second question is for Vinit. So Vinit, a commendable performance on the cash flow conversion. But on the margin front, you mentioned that there were 200 basis points of impact from furloughs and lesser number of working days and the pass-through. Now agreeing that some of the pass-throughs and furloughs, as you mentioned, might be there in the next quarter itself. But shouldn't large part of this 200 basis points of impact in this quarter, shouldn't large part of that get reversed next quarter?
Yes. As we said that the portion which is pertaining to the furloughs, it will definitely -- some portion of that will come back. The only thing the traditional assumption, which was there that all the furloughs return back on Jan 1, that doesn't happen. That we are seeing it, it did happens in a gradual fashion. And that's the reason the impact -- while the revenue from a run rate perspective at the end of the March probably may come back to that level, but the impact during the quarter is going to be felt on the margins. There will be some positive clawbacks that will happen definitely in Q4. But we also want to be cautious given the uncertainty which is prevailing at that amount of time to be -- how much of that is -- how much of headwinds we may get as a surprise, and how much of that we want to invest back into the business. So that is also something which as DC has alluded, we want to continue doing it.
Got it. So as a -- just a follow-up to that. As we have mentioned that the target of reaching 17% to 18% by Q4 has been pushed out by a few quarters. We had also mentioned reaching full year margin 17% to 18% in FY '25. Does that also stand -- pushed out by a few quarters or whatever the time frame is? Or do we -- I mean, how do we see that in the current context?
Yes -- extending that logic, absolutely, it will. But we will continue to watch the situation and if there are any course corrections that needs to be made, we will do that course corrections. Our -- the fundamental principle in terms of the margin improvement program and some of the efficiencies that we need to bring in our business, that program continues. How much -- some quarters may see some investments happening. Some quarters might be a little bit liberal and you may see that money coming back into the margins. So that is something we'll watch over that period of time and as the business situation goes on.
The next question is from the line of Sandeep Shah from Equirus Securities.
DC, the question is in terms of one of the negative surprises which you called out to miss the predictability on the fourth quarter has been the discretionary spend outlook not improving. But that statement was loud and clear for the whole industry for the last 2 to 3 quarters. So why we were not able to budget that? And at that in the October month, why we were so optimistic about the H2 being better than H1? We can understand Q3 has a higher furloughs, but why we were optimistic in terms of our discretionary spend outlook improving in the fourth quarter?
Well, I think the primary reason for where we are today is basically the wider and the deeper furloughs that we have seen. And we normally anticipated above-average furloughs, but the furloughs which we have seen are much wider. We used to see furloughs restricted to a couple of industries more than the others, but this time, the furlough was fairly broad-based. It's much wider. And even the depth of the furlough within each of those industries, we have seen significantly higher furloughs than what we normally see. I think this was not something that we anticipated. Probably that is the single most reason why we feel or -- the single most reason for us to be where we are. And some of the discretionary, we knew it will not come back, but some -- I mean some of the discretionary spend once you finish a project if it's a regulatory or something that project continues. But in some situations, those also did not continue. So essentially, it is not that we did not know that discretionary will be impacted. But still, there were some portion which we were very confident about, that did not come back.
Okay. Okay. And last question in terms of any large client-specific issue, especially in BFSI or High-Tech because your top client in BFSI is on a roll of big cost-cutting exercise globally. So is it impacting us? And that is also making a slightly more bearish on the BFSI outlook?
No. As of now, I would say no, but we are watching the space very closely. I think the -- when you talk about BFSI, as I said, there is an impact on BFS. It's not -- slightly more broad-based rather than 1 client. But yes, I know what you're talking about, and we are watching the space very closely.
Okay. So as of now, no...
As of now no impact.
Next question is from the line of Abhishek from InCred Capital.
I just have 1 question. We have seen a sequential decline in almost 3 of our large verticals, yet the top 5 and 6 to 10 accounts have seen a sequential strong growth. So how should we read this dichotomy? Or if we can add any color in terms of -- is there a material change in the large client mix that historically we have been doing? Or any color could be really helpful.
I think that's the only color. I think if you look at the top 5 clients, there are some clients do change positions from time to time. I think that's the primary reason why you see the change. But that's the only thing I can say.
Next question is from the line of Sumeet Jain from CLSA.
So DC, when you mentioned that the growth in Q4 will be similar to Q3 and when I look at your manufacturing vertical seasonality in the last 2 to 3 years, it is not as strong in Q4 as in Q3. So are you expecting other verticals than manufacturing to see some growth in Q4 despite furloughs still being there?
Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. We expect that -- as I said earlier, the overall growth that we are expecting as we go along is going to be fairly broad-based. It's not just going to be based on only 1 specific vertical.
And this revival and growth across verticals will be led by your large deals? Or is the discretionary demand reviving back?
It's mostly the large deals that we have already closed and the ramp-ups have started.
Got it, got it. And my second question is around in terms of your margin target of 17% to 18% over next few quarters may be pushed out. But what will be the key levers for you to achieve that target, given when I look at the various levers in terms of utilization, offshoring effort or maybe rationalization of tail accounts, almost all of them have been utilized to a large extent. So just to know what levers will you press upon?
So see, it is multiple levers that we are looking at, and some of these levers will be our gross margin improvement mainly. There are multiple accounts what we have called out in the past is one of the programs that we are running is the [ reg ] programs, the accounts which have lower margins, negative margins, which we are trying to work on with the clients to improve that. That is one something that will do it. Secondly is the pyramid rationalization. As you have seen in this -- as I mentioned in my remarks, we have added -- started adding pressures. This is the second consecutive quarter we have added the pressures. So that pyramid rationalization is something that we are working upon. The third part is in terms of looking at how can we reduce down an average cost of our resources. There will -- that will be the third one. And fourth, at the end of the day, when we have these multiyear deals, those also continue to give us a little bit of an advantage in terms of managing the pyramid and managing the cost within those projects in a much better way. So all those levers are at play. The only challenge what we are seeing is at this point of time, yes, we thought that we should be able to do a good progress by Q4. That has been delayed. And the other reason of the delay is also the fact that we want to invest back into the business because -- our utilization has reached now the peak. We had called it out in the past quarter also that this will remain in the short run at this level. But it is definitely at the peak, and we have to now look at adding some bench for the growth that will be coming in as soon as it comes in.
Yes. And on another note, I must tell you that whatever we talk about margin program, we only have so many levers. And these levers that -- there is no additional levers. I mean, whatever levers you run within a program, maybe everything is not applicable to every client situation at the same time, but you just have to run like a disciplined -- it is a discipline that we are running and that will continue.
Got it. Got it. And I think just 1 last question around your large banking customer. I think when they reported their results last week, it was quite evident that they have been in-sourcing quite a lot through entire calendar '23. So have you got any plans, what are they thinking of in '24, given the cost-cutting exercise they are doing across the globe?
I think over the years, we've told you that the work that we do for this client is in very core areas. So we work on core platforms in the corporate banking space mostly and in the RegTech space. So therefore, we have resilience in the work that we do in this client, and that continues. Now of course, as DC said, these changes have been announced recently, and we're watching the space closely to see how things pan out. But as of now, this -- it's been proceeding as per what our plan for the year was.
Next question is from the line of Rishi Jhunjhunwala from IIFL.
Two questions. Firstly, so if you look at our growth rate deceleration that has happened this year, it's almost close to around 15 percentage points from the 20% that we grew last year on a CC basis. And it would be among the highest if you'll just look at companies which are considered to be high-growth companies. What do you attribute it to specifically for us given that it is higher than most of the other high-growing peers? That is one. And secondly, in a period where growth is a bit challenging, and we have pushed out our margin targets also in the near term. Given that we now have almost like INR 10,000 crores of cash on the books, and we have not been much acquisitive. Do you think it's time to potentially increased payouts, given that if we look at most of the large cap companies, they have payouts anywhere between 70% to 100% of their free cash flows?
Well, I'll let Vinit answer the second question. But on the first one, if you talk about growth and if you talk about what we anticipated as growth, as we always said that when these 2 companies were brought together, it was not really considering any of the market conditions or macro or anything. It was more with the basis that both the companies should be coming together when both are doing well in their own rights. And that's exactly what we did. And our intention was also to integrate as quickly as possible so that we can do the cross-selling and upselling with our clients much more aggressively. I think all those things have worked out well. The only thing which probably did not go the way we wanted was because of the macro changing, the discretionary spend has come down significantly and both the companies, even earlier and LTIMindtree as a combined entity, we had a significant portion of revenue which was coming from client discretionary spend. That's one thing which has come down, but converting or rather getting us geared up for large deals which are more of efficiency deals, we kind of switched that very quickly. But having said that, the large deals take more time to materialize. There has been -- the decision-making has been delayed. So all those things also played in terms of whatever you see in the growth. Vinit, you want to take the second question?
Yes. So Rishi, on the cash -- the cash allocation policy, one thing which we want to ensure is, first, this momentum we wanted to sustain and we want to build upon a cash balance -- a good amount of cash balance. Number two, on a daily basis, we do evaluate multiple candidates for M&A opportunities. So that exercise continues. So at the right time, when there is a right opportunity available, we do want to consider and look at making those investments. Third part, the payout policy is a reflection of the profit -- has to be based on the profitability, not based on the cash balance that is sitting with us. So at the end of the day, our aim is to generate a little bit higher returns and higher cash flow returns, then we can think about improving our the cash payout. But at this point of time, there will not be any change in the short run.
Next question is from the line of [ Rakesh Kumar ] from BNP Paribas.
I have just 1 question. See your commentary related to growth and that of margin, there seems to be dichotomy between those 2. So while you are uncertain about the growth outlook, accordingly, your guidance for the second half coming down materially. Whereas when you're talking about the margin, you are preparing yourself for growth. This high utilization ideally should not have surprised you because you were already preparing for a much stronger growth in second half. So I'm trying to understand that, where is this dichotomy coming out from?
Yes. So typically, if you look at, right, the resources in most of our business and especially with the large deals that we're talking about, which has transitioned involved, the resources typically lead the revenue, right? And typically, the revenue shows up in our P&L anywhere between 2 to 3 months down the line based on the construct of the deal. And higher utilization part that we are talking about are looking at lowering that utilization in the short term is coming from that angle, where we need to now be prepared for the deals that we are in the final stages for. And as we close those deals, we need to be prepared to have sufficient bench to be able to ramp up those deals on time. And that's really the commentary around taking the utilization down. The higher utilization in the earlier quarters, again, the utilization was expected to be higher, but not to the level that we've ended up taking it. If you remember, even in last quarter, we talked about, 85% is our comfort zone from a utilization perspective longer term. So in some quarters, it will be up or down. But that's really -- and today, we are at 87.4%. So that's where the -- we believe that it's much higher than what we would like to be. And hence, we would like to lower that in order to prepare for the deals that we are closing.
Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, we will take that as a last question. On behalf of LTIMindtree Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.