Home First Finance Company India Ltd
NSE:HOMEFIRST
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
791.1
1 340.75
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Home First Finance Company India Ltd
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to Home First Finance Company India Limited Q4 FY '24 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded.
I now hand the conference over to Mr. Manish Kayal, Head, Investor Relations, at Home First Finance. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Rea. Good morning, everyone. I hope that all of you and your family are safe and healthy. I extend a very warm welcome to all participants on our Q4 FY '24 annual conference call.
I hope everybody had an opportunity to go through our investor deck and press release uploaded on stock exchanges [indiscernible].
We have also uploaded the Excel spreadsheet with historical numbers on our website, so please have a look.
On today's call, we have our MD and CEO, Mr. Manoj Viswanathan; and CFO, Mr. Nutan Gaba Patwari.
We will start this call with an opening remarks, by Manoj and Nutan and then we will have Q&A season. With this introduction, I hand over the call now to Manoj. Over to you, Manoj.
Thank you, Manish. Good morning, everyone. I'm pleased to share with you the highlights of the quarter 4 and the full year FY '24 performance. We concluded FY '24 on a strong note. Disbursements at INR 3,963 crores grew by 31.5% and AUM grew by 34.7%. The spread remained healthy at 5.4%. The PAT at INR 306 crores grew by 33.9% on a year-on-year basis, leading to ROA of 3.8%.
Delighted to deliver ROE of 15.5% for the full year FY '24. And quarter 4 FY '24 saw it higher at 16.1%, even in a high interest rate environment.
We continue to build the distribution by simultaneously entering new markets and deepening our presence in existing markets. The state of Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan are emerging as a large affordable housing markets, and we have taken steps to strengthen our presence and expand distribution in these states.
Overall, we have added 22 branches in FY '24 and now we have 133 physical branches.
Including potential and digital branches, we now do business across 321 touch points. Across [indiscernible] markets in 13 states.
We have added 7 branches in UP, MP and Rajasthan in FY '24, serving 16 additional touch points in these states.
Our asset quality continues to be strong with a focus on early delinquencies. 1 plus GPD is at 4.2% and it has declined with 30 basis points from previous quarter.
30 plus DPD is at 2.8%. It's a decline of 20 basis points from the previous quarter. Gross Stage 3, GNPA is at 1.7%, flat quarter-on-quarter. And prior to RBA classification circular, the figure stands at 1.1%.
Our credit cost is at -- was at 10 basis points. That was a [indiscernible] of 20 basis points on a quarter-on-quarter.
Overall, collections remain strong and even in quarter 4, we have had considerable recoveries from previous written-off accounts, contributing to these low credit cost levels.
We continue to maintain our credit cost guidance of about 30 to 40 basis points.
Digital adoption continues to be strong and the key area of our focus as we grow. 95% of our customers are registered on our app. Unique user log-in was 53% in quarter 4. Service requests raised on the app was at 89%.
In quarter 4, we have processed 47% of our loan sanctions with data coming from the Account Aggregator.
Another important point to communicate is that our Chairman, Mr. Deepak Satwalekar tenure has been extended for the second term of 5 years, subject to shareholders' approval at the upcoming AGM.
With this, I would now like to hand over the call to Nutan to take you through the financials. Nutan, over to you.
Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Starting with the spreads in NIM, our overall spread is at 5.2% and our spread ex co-lending is at 5.4%.
Our overall Q4 net interest margin stands at 5.3%. The NIM compression is an outcome of continued growth and increase in financial leverage, increased cost of borrowing and higher cash and cash equivalent holding in Q4.
The breakup of this NIM compression is around 20 basis points coming from cost of borrowing in fees net of repricing, 20 basis points on part of financial leverage, and 20 basis points on higher cash.
Moving ahead, our ex co-lending spread guidance of 5.5 -- or 2.5% stands for the medium term.
Co-lending is building well in line with plan and remains a return accretive product in markets we operate.
Our first milestone is to take it to 10% of AUM . Today we're only at 3%. As you all must also be watching, the deposit rates are holding. MCLR own banks are trending up on the back on the back of tight liquidity situation.
Despite all of this, our marginal cost of borrowing remains range bound for the last 5 to 6 quarters with continued diversification.
Our ability to engage with banks for improved pricing comes from continued focus on transparency of sharing information with lenders and our scalable business model that allows us to expand by managing risks.
We also got an outlook upgrades from India Ratings, one of our 3 rating agencies. This kicks off a very important journey for us to move to the next trading category.
Moving to operating cost. Operating cost stood at 2.5% for Q4 is due to cleanup of some old provisions as part of closing the financials for the year.
We continue to maintain the guidance of 3% going ahead as we focus on expansion and debt deeper into new market.
Our balance sheet is strong and ready to take on the growth ambitions of company. Starting with borrowing, the company continue to have diversified and cost-effective long-term financing sources. This remained diversified across banks and industry.
Our borrowing mix as we already seen continues to be 60% from bank, NHB is at 18%, and we've also taken a further drawdown of the INR 50 crores in April '24.
14% from direct [indiscernible] and 3% from co-lending, 3 percentage from IFC and CD, and we have no borrowings from commercial tape-out.
Our cost of borrowing is competitive at 8.25%, an increase of only 3 basis points quarter-on-quarter.
Coming to capital. Our capital adequacy is at 39.5%, with Tier 1 at 39.1%. Our debt-to-equity is now at 3.4x. Our March '24 net worth is INR 2,122 crores, and book value per share is INR 240 crores.
Moving to provisions. We have remained conservative and continue to carry provision over and above the ECL requirements. The total provision coverage ratio stands at 50.9%. Prior to NPA reclassification as per RBI Circular, our PC stand at 75.7%.
On specific transactions, we did direcct assignment of INR 103 crores during the quarter as a liquidity strategy. We continue to have a very robust demand for our portfolio of assets.
Our total co-lending volume in Q4 was INR 68 crores for quarter 4 and INR 214 crores for the full year. Co-lending business is growing, and we expect to contribute 10% of AUM in the near future.
With this, I open the floor for questions and answer.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Abhijit Tibrewal from Motilal Oswal.
Congratulations, Manoj and Nutan meeting commitment. Another good quarter for you and the team. I had just three questions. First one for Nutan, how should we look at cost of borrowings trending? I think you've guided that 1, 2 quarters, it is going to stabilize. Where are we now in terms of the outlook on cost of [indiscernible]?
Abhijit, like I was mentioned, everyone is watching the overall liquidity situation in the deposit rate and MCLRs. So what we're experiencing is [indiscernible] able to continue to maintain the pricing. Public sector banks, there is a little bit of better -- higher pushback. Nonetheless, our pricing is maintained at the same level for the last 5 to 6 quarters as we've been disclosing the numbers as well. So net-net, coming to cost of borrowing another 10, 20 basis points at best is what we're looking at. We are not extending further increase, unless, of course, the policy rate changes or the [indiscernible] pricing changes. With this environment, another 10, 20 basis points, not more than that.
Got it. And the second question I had for Manoj. I mean, if I look at the BPO rates until last year, the number which used to be in the ballpark of 6%, right? Suddenly seems to have moved in this year to 7.5% to 8%. So I mean is there anything you are seeing there? Because what we've seen in the past, right, as organizations grow as organizations mature and other lenders, right, have more comfort on your originations, the appetite to take the balance transfers or other institutions go up. So anything that you're seeing there on balance transfers?
No, I think the balance transfers slightly elevated only because of the repricing that has happened. I mean we don't see any kind of long-term trend or anything like that. Largely as the reaction to this sharp increase in rates that has happened in the last 2 years. It's largely result of that. And we are also putting in place a lot of new measures to address the balance transfers.
We don't see that as a major concern. I mean it is a concern, but it's not a major concern because you can see overall erosion, erosion levels are still at the same level. So it seems to kind of what do you call it, balance out between balance transfers and on prepayments, et cetera.
The total erosion still stands at about 18% -- 16% to 18%, including the balance transfers. So it's not like the increase in balance transfers increased erosion rate of the portfolio.
Got it. And one last question that I had was more of the sectoral level. I mean you'll recall, there was the circular from RBI, which spoke about HFC is now kind of kind as to [indiscernible] charging in place on loans only when the check was handed over to the customer. So what I'm kind of trying to understand is at the sectoral level, what you're seeing is it can even take up to 30 days, 40 days in a lot of cases from the time that check is printed to the time the check is actually handed over to the customer. So I mean, two things I wanted to understand from you in terms of our practices, what is our practice, in terms of how -- when we start charging interest to customers. And if at all, you see this having any impact on the interest income?
So in our case, we don't issue checks at all. So as a practice, we have been doing electronic transfers from day 1. There are, of course, a certain proportion of transactions, especially on the sale transactions, where the customers themselves require demand draft because they have to show the demand draft to the seller so that the seller will transfer the property in their name. So that is a kind of assurance. So those are the only transfers that we issue a demand draft. In the case of a demand draft, we are also incurring the cost from day 1 because the money goes out of our account. So we charge interest with the customer.
However, the clearance happens fairly quickly. So I mean, we don't have a practice of actually issuing a check and then completing the transaction later, et cetera. So the turnaround time between issuing the demand draft and clearing happens fairly quickly. So within 30 days, almost 90% [indiscernible] issued demand this year. It could be maybe a 15-day turnaround, deposit is cleared.
And we don't have a very large one. Basically, it largely happens in the case of resale transactions where the seller requires the assurance. So those are the only cases where we issued a demand draft and it is done electronically.
Got it. So in essence, I mean, for us, it is not going to be much of an impact because any lease transactions should be a much lower proportion of our disbursements. And there also -- like you are seeing, there was a 50% on an average kind of a lag between the demand draft getting printed and hand it over to the customer.
Correct.
So now if at all, this is the only impact which will be there. But now on printing of demand draft, you can start charging the customer only when the demand draft gets handed over, you start charging interest.
Exactly. The RPS does not mention demand draft. So we will have to get a clarification on that in due course.
Next question is from the line of Rajiv Mehta from Yes Securities.
Congrats on [indiscernible]. So firstly, on the ordinary [indiscernible] decline [indiscernible] on Q-on-Q basis. And second is on the accelerated shift towards more than 1.5 million loan ticket in this quarter. And this was [indiscernible] for [indiscernible] that should be to significant in this quarter. So [indiscernible] behind both.
Okay, I...
Your question was not clear, Rajiv. Can you repeat?
Can you hear me clearly now?
Yes.
Yes. First question is on the origination yield ex of co-lending. That has come down by 30 basis points quarter-on-quarter. And the second is the AUM shift in this quarter towards more than 1.5 million done ticket has been pretty accelerated. And this is also ex of co-leading. If you remove the impact of coleading, the shift is pretty significant. So what is also driving this?
Sure.
So origination yield will be range. We are -- our target is to hit it with 13.5% kind of an origination yield, but there will be some quarter-to-quarter fluctuations on that. Nothing more to read into that. And the second question was on...
Average ticket size.
Average ticket size, as we have mentioned before, that there is, there will be a secular increase in ticket size [indiscernible] as we go forward because in certain areas in the country, the ticket size is of higher incomes and aspirations of people to build larger houses or purchase larger houses. So there will be a gradual taken ticket sizes, but it's not very -- I mean, we are not addressing -- we're not going after a different segment. It is just a normal in that we are likely to see as the country progresses.
And the second question is on Gujarat, which is a key market. Incrementally, there will be a growth slowdown in Gujarat. So when I calculate the growth Q-on-Q has been around 4.5%, 5% this quarter versus 6%, 8% in the previous quarter. So the slowdown which we have seen in this quarter in Gujarat, is it linked to what competition we have? Is it that the higher amounts of BP out are happening in Gujarat because it's more to mature [indiscernible]? And if there is this market not happening [indiscernible]
Gujarat, you're referring to the AUM decline in Gujarat, that is something...
Incremental AUM growth.
Yes, incremental AUM growth. Yes. So because we are diversifying our [indiscernible] to other markets, it's kind of intended number. Our NIM is at over time, share of Gujarat will come down in the overall mix. And -- but no, in Gujarat also see, our share is about 4% to 5%. So there is still a lot of headroom to grow. So it's not that we are looking at a slower growth in Gujarat. We aim to grow by between 20% to 30% in Gujarat as well.
[indiscernible]. Lastly, can you explain the [indiscernible] in the quarter, but the employee cost as well the nonemployee cost because I see that [indiscernible] the OpEx has come down. Have I missed out something in terms of in the press release?
Nothing to miss, Rajiv, essentially because March is the financial year close. We took this as an opportunity to clean up some excess provisions that were there that kind of got built up essentially [indiscernible] that. And that's why when I was talking about my opening remarks, I mentioned that the right number to look at moving ahead is 3%. We should not get anchored to the 2.5%.
Next question is from the line of Shreepal Doshi from Equiris.
I'm coming to [indiscernible] what is the [indiscernible] on sanction [indiscernible] NHB?
NHB, again, has [indiscernible]. It varies from scheme to scheme. So the range that we gave from NHB is anywhere from 5.5% to 8.5%. So that's the range that NHB lends on. It depends on the funds available. With them, the pool that we can tag and refinance, their mix and how they want to share it with different HFCs, but the combination of various factors, but that remains to be the change.
Okay. Have -- so we must have seen a change or increase in that range as well, right, in the last 6 months' time period?
Yes.
So technically, if we would have passed on that change to our customers as well, right?
So if it is the floating book, yes. If it is fixed book, then it does not change, but it is fixed from NHB as well. The age of NHB, for example, remains fixed. The other scheme is rooting for the [indiscernible]. But the [indiscernible] is not 1:1. We do pass on a specific period, which would be planned for it. So we will not specifically go and then pass on for customers which are [indiscernible]. We will not do that.
Okay, okay. And the second question and also [indiscernible] credit cost. So if you look at structurally, we had credit cost between 30 to 50 basis points. So this quarter, it has been a little lower. So while if you look at peers in the landscape, they have been in the range of 15 to 20 basis points. So with portfolio seasoned now and having seen 2 big cycles, is it fair that incrementally, we can also stabilize at relatively lower levels.
So let me give you the context and how we get [indiscernible] provisioning perspective because that impacts credit cost. So firstly, as you would have seen, our delinquencies have improved and stabilized across buckets, right? So therefore, the ECL movement is only for new groups that we build on the book. But we also try to carry a larger provision than what the [indiscernible] throws up, and we have a significant overlap management perspective.
So specifically for this quarter, what has happened is that we've had some write-backs from loans that were originally written off during the period and data because we've been taking prudent calls to do technical write-offs, but we've had recoveries of almost close to INR 2.5 crores. That is essentially why this quarter, the number is looking low.
Moving ahead because of the provisions that we've continue to carry, which is higher, we continue to carry slightly higher provisions and growth as well. The right number for us probably is around 30 basis points, not 15, not 20. So around 30 basis points is what we think we should be projecting.
Okay. Okay. Got it. And the last question was on the branch expansion side. So incrementally, which states would drive our branch expansion?
So we are looking at some of the emerging affordable markets like UP, MP and Rajasthan to drive further expansion. So as we mentioned, 7 out of the 22 branches that we have put up last year are in these states. And in the coming year also, we intend to further expand into these states.
Next question is from the line of Sameer Bhise from JM Financial.
Congrats on good quarter. So if I look at the marginal cost of borrowing, that's still like 40 bps away from the on-book cost that we see on Slide 29. So by when do you think the both converge, like given the environment remains the way it is right now?
So Sameer, hopefully never is the answer because we also have NHB borrowing. So as you would have seen on the liquidity slide, we have a INR 250 crores sanctioned line [indiscernible] NHB, which we have drawn down in April, which allowed us to kind of maintain the cost of borrowing. And of course, this FY '25, there is also this [indiscernible], which will again help us manage the cost of borrowing. So from a projection perspective, the 8 50, more like 8 50 in 2 quarters to 3 quarters and was fully flatlined there. Again, the assumption is that there is no policy rate change or [indiscernible] changes in the overall capital -- the capital markets.
So then is there a case for a bit of a pricing increase on the asset side?
Yes, Manoj will answer.
So pricing increase, as we mentioned earlier, the -- up to small increases like 10, 20 basis points, we are looking to absorb it, and we are not looking to pass it on to the customer. because we want to give the customers a stable period where we don't keep changing the rates. We will watch the trends. If there is a substantial increase, then, of course, we will have to pass it on. But if there are the increase, the difference remains in the 20 basis point range, we will not pass it on.
Fair enough. So I think like until 20 basis points, you are okay to hold on to current spread levels that you hav NHB access also?
Secondly, if I just look at the quarterly ROA profile. So for the full year, I think we have been able to hold on well at around 3.8%. But say, if I look at a 5- to 6-quarter trend, steadily there has been like a 30 bps kind of a drop. Is it the right way to look at it on a quarterly basis? And would it be fair to comment that probably the ROA kind of bottomed out at current levels?
Yes. So by the way, ROA will keep declining slightly every quarter because that's the financial leverage that is [indiscernible]. That's much of movement you will see.
I mean there may be some fluctuations in some quarters because of higher cash being kept, et cetera. But otherwise, on a secular trend, you will see that there is a small decline every quarter, which is largely due to the financial leverage.
Yes. So in terms of our threshold on the downside, we would be towards the trough now?
Yes. So the way to look at it -- so let me share how we're looking at next year's people [indiscernible] for example. So we've always been talking about the spread of 5 to 5.25, right? When you look at that, our NIM for full year is 5.8. So let's say, 5.5% NIM more or less, and 2.2% to 2.5% of other income. So that lands somewhere between 78% of total net total income. And OpEx of 3% and a credit cost of 30 basis points, you will land at a ROA of [indiscernible]So that's [ 3.6% ]. But let's say you went around [indiscernible] leave you [indiscernible] financial [indiscernible].
Next question from the line of Raghav Garg from Ambit.
Please question on roughly you gave in principle [indiscernible] right after further due diligence. Just wanted to clarify what incented.[indiscernible] just one clarification on that and then [indiscernible].
No, not at all. Not at all. You want to [indiscernible] yes. The interest only payment goes out of the system. And the [indiscernible] debited for the amount, only then the interest us.
Congrats on that.. My second question is on incremental spreads. So I think you are currently 5 25 [indiscernible] incremental spreads, it's around 4.7%, right? So how is it that you will be able to bridge that gap from 4.7% to say 5.25%?
So Raghav there are quarters where the spread will be lower. Essentially, those quarters really do not take the NHB funding. But the quarters that we've taken NHB funding, the spreads will also expand. So the overall spread for the year, therefore, will kind of compensate that and land is at [indiscernible]range, but of course, we talked about dual expansion. We've talked about the product mix slightly increased in the last [indiscernible] so all those things will contribute to spread as well.
Right. Nutan, if I look at your spreads since 1Q FY '23, they've been coming down, right, and that's because of the higher cost of quarterly. There hasn't been a quarter where -- or there hasn't been a series of quarters where the spreads are fluctuated up and down. So why should that be the case going forward?
Reason that is coming down is because the cost of borrowing has increased sharply. There has been a significant catch-up. Now the catch-up is complete. So therefore, it will kind of stabilize. But we the[indiscernible] , which I'm talking about ex co-lending numbers. We should start seeing some expansion in that from new products as well.
Understood. And last question, why was your OpEx ratio lower or absolute OpEx flat despite branch and employee addition?
There some cleanup in the financials, Raghav. I mean this is March. So we kind of do a deep clean up of the financials. So we had some old provisions which we said is kind of better to kind of knock them off.
Okay. Understood. And sorry, just one more last question. So what is the outstanding pool of written-off loans, which [indiscernible] from going ahead?
The potential that pool, I mean, the number would be close to INR 20 crores, but we do not expect the INR 20 crores to come and hit us as write-back the income in the future. What we see is usually for 70 lakh for this quarter.
This quarter, it was around INR 2.5 crores. Of course, we did some focus activity as well on that. So I would not expect more than 50 lakhs, 70 lakhs going ahead every quarter.
Next question the line of Pranav Mehta, Valuequest Investment.
[indiscernible] If there has been any change in terms of the [indiscernible] that has been a bit is available to [indiscernible]? And [indiscernible] how do we see the RHP pool [indiscernible] as a proportion of our entire borrowing tool going forward, is there going to be any kind of significant increase in portion? And how does that asset the overall look like?
No significant change as far as we are familiar with. NHB does have this process of inspection and quality of reporting and everything else, which determines the size of the borrowing.
One of the [indiscernible] ideas that we also understand has got an added is the incremental housing loans. And a percentage of that is what NHB will be funding. So we are the best placed from that perspective. So coming to the second part of your question, NHB refinance as a percentage of the overall book. Mine, [indiscernible] will be 20% on a average basis. I mean we believe plus, minus 2%, depending on whether we've taken the case not taken [indiscernible] ballpark of [indiscernible]. And the number or the percentage cost of borrowing 8.3 is where we are right now. Like I was mentioning earlier, 8.50 assumes that we will continue to maintain an finance and be able to deliver 8.5%, let's say, for the rest of this year.
And currently also, we are at around 20% [indiscernible]. Okay, okay. But I just wanted to have your comments on one of the larger NBF/HFC. I mean, you can call it [indiscernible] has exited the market. And I thought that one would be available to all of you guys, so [indiscernible] and I just wanted your comments on why there has not been a significant increase in availability.
So your question is why some other ASPs does not have 20%? Is that what you're asking?
No, no. I'm asking about all the for all the PCs that are there in the market, the pool should have significantly increased as the biggest player has now merging the to [ 12% ] bank, right? So that's my question.
We tend to agree with you. But going back, NHB runs the treasury function. It's not the money that they have from the government or subsidies. They essentially raise from the market because they wer [indiscernible] small margin [indiscernible] would have reduced to account for the largest HSE move to becoming a bank.
Okay. One last question from my side. What would be the difference in the borrowing rate NHB? Was this marginal the borrowing rate at the present at the moment?
Almost 60 basis points.
Next question is from the line of Nischint Chawathe from Kotak Institutional Equities.
Three small questions. One is, where do you account for recovery from of loans?
In the credit cost line.
So this is adjusted in the credit cost?
Yes.
Okay. How do you account for co-lending income? Where does it get reflected?
So co-lending income gets reflected on the spread basis. So it essentially, only the delta gets represented in the interest income line.
Okay.
Okay. It is not like fee income or something.
No, no, no. The fee income is sitting in the fee line, but there's no upfronting, that's your question.
I got it. And this comes -- sorry, just to clarify, this comes on interest on loans or does it come on other interest income?
Interest on loans.
Okay. Got it. Can you quantify the number for this quarter or the year or it's too insignificant?
I'll have to come back to you.
Okay. Okay. Maybe you can do it from next year, we start getting a little more [indiscernible].
Yes, we view that once we get to this milestone of 10% on co-lending. It merit separate disclosure on the product. Otherwise, it's too small.
Fair point. The reason why I'm saying is that you can just book a spread and the IGAAP yield calculation that you do sort of tends to get a little distorted and obviously kind of get into that discussion mode.
The other one was that, why did the repayment rate go up for the quarter? And ideally, I would have expected the repayment rate to be lower this year versus the previous year.
You're talking about the balance [indiscernible]?
No, the repayment rate. So the simple math is you have the loan book number, you have the disbursements for the period. So you could mathematically calculate the repayment. And we obviously don't know the breakup of repayment between prepayments and BT-out or scheduled repayment. So just some color on that.
The number is 18%, right? You're looking at the same....
18.5%. That's right. So 18.5% for the quarter. For the full year, it remains flat at 20.5%, which we would have really expected to go down. So, just some color on that. Is it something that -- but out have gone up?
No. The you see the total erosion rate quarter-on-quarter largely in the 18% range only. It ranges between, say, about 7% to 20%. Some quarters of 17%. Some quarters 19%, 18.5%, et cetera. So that's the range is [indiscernible]. So this quarter has not been very different.
So the total erosion rate that is what you're referring to -- is only is 18.5% for the quarter. That includes the balance transfer, which is about 8-odd percent.
And the balance comes from loan prepayments and the [indiscernible] approach, et cetera.
Last year, the BT out was lower than 8%, right?
Yes. Last year, the BD was lower than 8%. But if you see the erosion rate that again was in the same 18% to 20% range only. Total erosion was [indiscernible].
So last year, anything there was something because of the PLS scheme and the repayment rates were higher, and this year, despite the fact that there's [indiscernible] penetrated still at around 20.5%, which probably means that the difference is [indiscernible]. I think that's why my question was.
Last year, including [indiscernible], rate was higher actually because the higher by about 3%. This year, it's come down by about 3%.
Last year was about [ 20% ]. This year, average is about 18%.
So mathematically both, I can take it offline, that mathematical impairment rate for '23 and '24, both yours is 22.5%. And we would have expected that ex of CLSS, probably this goes down to maybe 200 basis points or so. So maybe that is the increase in BT. I think that's what I was -- that I wanted to check.
Yes, reduction in PLS probably has been compensated by a slight increase in BT out.
And is this because of competition? Or what is it that you are seeing the big high [indiscernible].
Rates are higher or largely because of rates being.
Higher because we have repriced the large part of our book and that is creating some tension with customers. That's primarily the reason. So we have analyzed our BT also. So largely the BT [indiscernible] cases where there has been a I mean, the 3 rate increases over last year have been passed down to those customers. So those are the customers who are more prone to [indiscernible].
And the last rate hike you would have done in which month?
Last hike, we did in April of the last year.
'23.
April '23.
That's a long-term back, right? I mean there's -- some of your peers have done it as late as January of this month. So Jan of '24. It's not like nobody else's price rates.
Are you seeing new players in the market? Are you kind of maybe sort of are any of your borrowers getting migrated to the larger bank? Whom are you like moving [indiscernible]
Migration of larger clients . Migration is largely to the larger banks. So I mean, new players in any case, will not target [indiscernible] as a starting point or as their core business because they'll have a challenge on cost of borrowing, et cetera. So it will be largely the bigger brands and bigger financial -- bigger housing companies that target [indiscernible].
Nischint, just a couple of points from my side on in BT out, one is you compare us as with the peers because you brought up that point. Home loan to home loan, we're operating at a much higher pricing in the market in competitive markets. So that makes us more prone to BT out per se, but we've kind of maintained that and we've delivered the growth despite that.
The second issue in comparison is that most peers [indiscernible] with a mix of [indiscernible] floating book. So -- and with these numbers are not fairly disclosed on the [indiscernible] and the fixed book. So the comparison is not very fair.
What we can compare is the total runoff. And if you compare that, us versus anyone else in the market, it's broadly aligned. So it's not isolate issue for us but in a sense, our BT how compared to anyone else.
If you compare runoff, it's identical. Pricing the market is higher so that makes us more prone to BPO be played by design.
Got it. But is it something that you may want to review going forward given the fact that competitive intensity seems to be heating up?
Yes. So we will -- we have a total [indiscernible] that we will want to look at customers and cohorts and see where we need some pool of customers to reprice upwards and downwards also take risk into consideration. So that is something that we will do probably this quarter.
And in that backdrop, what kind of margin guidance would you give? Would you say that we are willing to sort of drop down the spreads a little bit in the...
No. So the idea is that the increase in reduction compensate each other.
Sorry, what has increased?
So there could be some pool of customers where the risk has gone up, so we can reprice them. And some pool of customers where we're saying that take our onto BT out and hence [indiscernible] and downwards so we can go hard by cohort by cohort rather than looking at the entire book.
Next question is from the line of Nidesh from Investec.
So first is on insurance income. We have at the corporate [indiscernible]. So kindly update on that? And what could be the quantum of fee income that can be related from that vertical?
So we got the agency license in February this -- February '24. We are in the process of discussions with the multiple insurance agencies -- sorry, companies. We are in advanced stages. We hope that we should be able to find one agreement in this quarter.
Once we sign at least like as a 2 to 3 and cover the entire book that we actually onboard today, my expectation is that should add close to 5 crores to INR 6 crores of additional income into the P&L, on a quarterly basis. So let's say Q4 -- Q3 onwards is when you should be able to see the full income of INR 5 crores to INR 6 crores in the P&L. And how fast can we get there, maybe mid of Q2 or early Q3, something that we'll have to see. But INR 5 crores to INR 6 crores quarterly is what we have in mind.
Sure. Secondly, what will be the branch expansion target for this year and next year?
Branch expansion, we are targeting 20 to 25 branches every year. And along with that, say, about 60 to 70 touch points per year. So that's our expansion plan.
Sorry, I missed the number, branch addition this year.
20 to 25 branches a year.
And in the new geographies, specifically UP, Rajasthan and MP where we are expanding our branches, what is the sourcing strategy and how -- what is the profile of connectors that we are acquiring here? Do you see any change in the financial profile? Are these connectors new to market or they are already sourcing business for someone in those markets?
Sourcing strategies are going to be the same what we have followed in other markets. And it's not that we are new to these states. We have been doing business in these states for a while now. It's just that we are scaling up. So largely, the profile of connectors, et cetera, remains the same. I mean, they would in -- it's a mix of both new connectors as well as people who might be sourcing for others. So that's generally the case in all the markets and grow for these markets as well.
And what is the active connector number for the quarter and number of RMs at the end of March '24 and March '23?
Active connectors, we had about 3,000 connectors for the quarter. And RMs was in the range of about 700 -- about 700 RMs.
Next question is from the line of Rahul Maheshwary from Ambit Asset Management.
Good set of numbers, Manoj. Congrats again. Just two questions. First, can you give some highlight on the borrowers across Pan-India? What is the income? How the income is shaping up, specifically in the India and [indiscernible]? Are you witnessing the growth or some kind of pressure? We have witnessed that there is some recovery, rural recovery taking place. So can you give some highlight that how the income -- and second, as you mentioned that UP and MP are the 2 states where you are getting more and more -- becoming more and more growth drivers. Can you highlight that each state has its own credit cost as a regional specific? Are you finding some case specifically towards those states? I mean you're entering or it's a pan-India basis, same kind of rate policy which you are opting out?
On the first question, as far as the income sector is concerned, we are not seeing any stress with our customers. It's overall looking strong. And there was -- whatever stress was there, both immediately post forward, et cetera, has also kind of tapered off now. People are, I mean, livelihoods are their jobs are available, so overall, it's a more positive picture across the country.
Rural was never a large part of our business. I mean, if at all, customers would have a very small impact or small advantage from rural incomes. So largely, our customers are from a service background or from manufacturing sector or they have their own businesses, et cetera. So they are not highly dependent on rural incomes or agricultural incomes.
As far as the credit cost by state is concerned, there is no such trend as such. It's largely location-led and depending upon the supervision and that location, et cetera. So credit quality of the quality of that particular portfolio. because consumer behavior across states, we have seen is fairly similar. I mean it is more related to the occupation the customer comes from their own income streams, et cetera. So not connected to the state as such. So we are not seeing any such trends. And the variations are not really state-led. It's more customer-led or customer profile-led, customer occupation-led is how we are seeing it.
Manoj, just one thing on the first question, how much -- if a set of borrowers, how much income growth you have witnessed in the last 1 year for them? Whatever the self-employed people, which are with you and who are regularly paying the EMIs. Any such number or some color you can quantify?
Income growth is not something that we track as a specific number, but we can just extrapolate based on ticket size growth because it comes or flows from income growth. So ticket size growth as you can see annually, we are seeing about a 10% kind of ticket as growth. So I would say incomes are also broadly moving in the same -- moving up in the same, I don't know, maybe 10% to 15% income growth is what we can kind of extrapolate.
Next question is from the line of Arvin R from Sundaram.
[indiscernible] that leverage would reach 5x by fourth quarter 2025. What would be the maximum leverage you would be comfortable with?
So at our planned expansion, debt-to-equity of 5x or debt-to-equity 6x is what we have in mind. We also look at capital adequacy ratios and what is the comfort level with banks and rating agencies. So all of that, we've taken into consideration and asset to equity of 6x, which gives us another 2, 2.5 years of runway is what is on our mind.
And like a provision coverage ratio is like actually ours is one of the highest among the peers. And considering they are also doing loans for the better set of customers, like can we expect credit cost to come down like -- I mean like I can also see like your PCR or also like come down in last 1 year consecutively, are we getting more and more comfortable with the -- like a lower credit cost than what we have done in the past?
So there are 2 ways we look at it. 1 year absolute is the PCL overall coming down. We've not reduced absolute provision. What has happened is that the new growth that we're adding that is with reason why the PCL looks low. What we track internally is the overall ECL provision as part of principal outstanding, which is around 0.9. That is the approximate numbers 0.8, 0.9 is what gives us comfort. Our ECL throws up around 0.5 number. So we want to kind of [ keep ] a 50%, 40%, 50% higher than that. So that's the broad process s at our end. So when we look at that and we project credit cost comes around 30 basis points going ahead.
And just one question, like on the yields I mean in co-lending also has come down. I'm just trying to understand how it will like a move? This is despite increasing the mix of [indiscernible] and like high-yielding segments. We are not able to hold up that cushion. Yes.
I mean, firstly, quarter-on-quarter a few quarters, it's largely stable, I would say. It has not been reducing ex co-lending.
The other angle to keep in mind is that compared to the peers, we're actually on the higher side with an 85% housing book. A 13.6% yield is something that we feel is really competitive from a market perspective. That's how we are looking at it right now.
And just one last question on the competition. PT out rates increasing, in case of the rate cut scenario, can this competition even become aggressive. What is your view on that?
Well, it is largely relative. So does the rate cut, then we'll also pass something on to the customer, et cetera. So it becomes relative. So that's increasing or decreasing does not really matter that much.
I think BT is largely a result of sharp increases over the last 12 to 18 months, which has been passed on to the customer. And if there is a period of stable interest rates and the BT out rate should moderate a little bit.
But if there is just one question, sorry to add, borrowings, especially the bank borrowing is it only predominantly linked to MCLR or is it linked to our report in the extra [indiscernible]?
Almost 3/4 is MCLR linked. The 1/3 is other external benchmarks.
Next question is from the line of Ravi from Naredi Investments.
Congratulations to Manoj and team to this 697 AUM and might probably this INR 10,000 crores in 40 days [indiscernible] might be INR 10,000 crores, I mean to say.
Sir, cost-to-income ratio, what is our target to reach in next 3 years? At present, it is [ 17.1% ].
So cost-to-income ratio, our aim is to keep pushing it down. In the next 1 or 2 years, likely to hover around the same level. Maybe from third year onwards, we can start seeing some decline. Our aim in the medium term is to get that down to around close to 30% levels. So I would say in maybe 3- to 5-year time frame, we should be able to get it down to 30% levels. The next 1 to 2 years, we are looking at 34%, 35% level.
Okay. Sir, our 2 promoters, north and [indiscernible], both having 23.6%. What I saw our price shares are way down in [indiscernible], we will exit from our company. So any information do you have about the exit of their promoter holding?
So as we mentioned in the past, they are likely to exit gradually because they are private equity funds. So currently, only 23% is left. So the aim is to probably exit by about 10% every year. So in the next 2 to 3 years, once a year has got the thought process is that once a year, there will be a 10% tail in the market and through a block exit, [indiscernible]. So we have tried to give it a bit of predictability in structure. So once a year is what I think we are basically broadly communicated. And since the last time, we also give, I think we have given a 6-month lock-in after previous transaction, which happened in November. Just to give comfort to the market that it will happen only once a year.
Next question is from the line of Sonal Gandhi from Central Brookings Limited.
I had a couple of questions. One is for the co-lending book, what is the yield that we are getting?
Close to 10%.
Close to 10%. Okay. Second related question pane in the has gone down by 30 basis points. Now I understand I'm talking about [indiscernible]. I understand the rate competitive, but our BT out is a little high, our co-lending rates are a little low. So how -- what gives us confidence that we'll be able to maintain between 5% to 5.25% kind of spread? If you could just try and give some clarity over there.
No problem.
Just one more question here. I'll add if you can. What will be the kind of what will be the percentage of last portfolio and our bookings on [indiscernible], which would kind of question [indiscernible]?
No problem. See, currently, our [indiscernible] is 5.4%, right? And we are guiding to 5% to 5.25%. So on the upper side, 5.25 to 5.40%, we already have 15 basis points that we have with us. We are saying that our cost of borrowing can go up to maximum 20 basis points. So we are still within that range. So mathematically, we feel very comfortable.
Of course, on the yield side, we have opportunities and labs. We have opportunities in smaller markets, which will continue to drive.
These last portion of our current portfolio is 13%. Our 3-year plan is to take it to 20%. So it will be gradually as it will not be very sharp but March 7 is 20%. So we have room there. So those are the things on our mind, which gave us the confidence to maintain this 5% to 5.25% exit co-lending.
And in the range that would be for the co-lending, that would spread then?
So the problem of co-lending spread and the reason we kind of split it out this time is that co-lending, we only keep 20% on our balance sheet. So let's say, when I said that the yield is 10%. And let's say, I am having a cost of borrowing of 8 75, the spread is 1 25, but that's an incorrect way to look at it because you have to multiply that by 5. So therefore, the number becomes 6 50, 6 75. That is the right way to look at it. Right now, the number is low because we have seen a very high interest rate situation.
Our aim and our thought process is that by the time we scale is up to 10%, co-lending today remains a return equity product on the balance sheet, primarily because we access the same market we are presented in an [indiscernible] segment. It uses our capital more effectively and allows us to build a return of [indiscernible] product.
We're at 3% today. We can scale it up 10%. And by the time the interest rate situation will improve, adding significantly to the overall profit of the company. So co-lending spread is not a straight answer, unfortunately.
So just the other way to ask it would be basically saying because you are taking the spread income on the co-lending book. So the spread should logically be higher than your on-book, probably that's not the case right now, but the spreads would be higher than on your on-book spreads. Is that understanding?
I get a spread on assets. It is actually for the example, which Nutan gave, it's 125 basis points is the spread.
If you look at it on the asset, the asset is INR 20 or INR 100. So if you take INR 125, INR 120, it actually then works out to 6 25, so it's relatively higher than the credit that we are running on 10 -- on our normal asset, which is 100%. So that's the way to look at it. Here, the asset is only 20% of the loan.
Okay. Okay. Another question was on fee income. So that looks a little low this quarter. So as the rates come down in the market, could they give some clarity around it?
No, the DA essentially fee. We have a lot of liquidity already on the balance sheet. We continue to do DA primarily because we have relationships with banks. And if you see our DA mix on the balance sheet, it's just [indiscernible] by 15%. So just more from a liquidity perspective, we did not want to load more cash on the balance sheet so we kept it at a lower number.
I mean, probably, we should start doing a little bit more, perhaps another INR 1,500 crores, let's see. That is something that we will plan it out.
Okay. Let me just take this offline because I think if I just calculate the percentage of that, it's also looking lower on a Q-o-Q basis. I take this offline.
My next question was on employee addition. So employee addition, I mean, we've added about 10 branches this quarter and anything employee addition is early around 13 employees. So what exactly is happening here?
So I mean I will let Manoj just get into the details. But the employee addition business happened when the branches need added always people come on board and then [indiscernible]. So it's a lead-in life effect. It's not 1:1 matching, but I'll request Manoj to get into the strategy on how we hire.
Yes. So because we hire almost 90% of our hiring is from [indiscernible] and from campuses, so there are periods when there are large batches which come in.
So for example, as of March, you're seeing the number. But if you see, as of April, there would be a large number of people who would have joined in April. So there is a bit of a -- you can say, a spike in certain months when there are large number of people joining. So it's more of a step function, not a smooth [indiscernible].
Understood. And what's your, I mean on UP market, MP market than Rajasthan you're growing really strong. I mean what is the mission sense that you have on the asset quality in this market sort of the initial trends?
So asset quality, as I mentioned, it is largely consumer-led and consumer profile-led, so we are taking care to ensure that we are onboarding what we are comfortable with because I mean the idea is to keep the credit quality similar to what we have in [indiscernible] the country. So as such, early signals, the early signals are good. Credit quality in these markets are also very similar to other markets.
Plus, as I also mentioned, we have been in this market for a while now, but they're not new to us, just that we are scaling up. So from that perspective, the credit quality is similar to what we had in the past.
Next question is from the line of Sandia from Unicon Assets.
Am I audible?
No sir, your voice is a little low.
Yes. Now is it clear?
Yes, sir.
Yes. So congratulations on great set of numbers. So my first question is like it's observing that our NIMs have been going slightly down as compared to quarter-on-quarter also last year address like from 6 point -- few basis points to now 5.3% in the latest quarter. So how are we looking at this?
So like I was mentioning in the opening remarks, there are 3 key contributors. One, we've had more cash on the balance sheet, then there is financial leverage as we grow that picks up. And of course, the cost of borrowing has also gone up, and we've repriced as well, but the net impact is there. So approximately 20 basis points, if you look at year-on-year is the impact.
More or less, most of these things have settled. So we are going ahead from here, let's say if you maintain this 5 to 5.25 basis point spread, which we have a significant degree of confidence.
Our [indiscernible] should be in a similar range where we are today with 5.3%, 5.5% is what we have thought. Because I mean the next question is financial average is going to go up, then how will you maintain the NIM because we have the cash cushion, which we can kind of look to manage better.
Okay. That's fine. So like 5 would be the minimum level, which we are looking 5% to 5.5% -- 5% to 5.25% would be the ideal?
Yes, yes.
Okay. Okay. And like my question was that we have been a major player in Gujarat and [indiscernible] of stages. It's a good import capital, right? And now we are entering into much like venturing is not the word -- we are aggressively venturing into MP and UP [indiscernible] and all these things. Whereas I see per capita income in these states are lower. How is the ticket size that we are referring to in these states? Is it the same like in the earlier we had for the states with higher per capita income or is it slightly lower or...
Ticket size is lower. In these states, the ticket sales is lower because these states also -- the product is largely self-construction. So the people are constructing their own homes.
And your a question on the profile. So when we started the business 10 years ago, the per capita income in places like Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, et cetera, was where it is in UP, MP today. So we are at that starting point when we started the business, so which is why we feel very confident that these states now will be large contributor for affordable housing.
And as they develop and show some development like the more industrialized states, we will have more affordable housing coming in. And the income -- people's income also will keep going up in the same manner, and we'll have a similar trajectory like what we have had in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, et cetera.
Okay. That's a good perspective to look at. So just adding on to the same thing. So what -- any number you want to give for the average ticket size compared to states like Gujarat and Maharashtra versus these newer states? And at the same time, what are the yields, particularly in these states compared to what in the other states?
So Gujarat you can say slightly different from states because it's largely an apartment-led market. So the ticket sizes tend to be a bit higher and the interest rates also tend to be slightly lower. But most of the other markets are very similar because they all [indiscernible] construction market. ticket sales tend to be around, 10 lakh or 10 lakh to 11 lakh in the new states that you're talking about. I can say it would be maybe 10, 20, 20 to 30 basis points higher because self-constructi market rates are slightly higher.
Okay. And do we see -- just on the same state bifurcation and AUM. So I can see that we have been constantly -- like as a percentage of gross loan adn compared to states due versus the vertical states units. So these states are continuously losing like from Gujarat from almost 33% to now 31%, same for Maharashtra and same -- I can see for where as Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan, we are aggressively trying to increase this.
So what is the mix that we are going to see? Like currently, I can see 50% is coming from these 3 states at Maharashtra and Kanata, I would say, more than 50% is going to be much more lower? What are the, which would be the highlight, say, like 3 years, 4 years down the line? I'm not talking in the short term, right, from [indiscernible].
Yes, 3 years, 4 years down the line, I think we would be aiming for something like a 10% share across the states. So unless the state -- I mean, and similar size states. The population is very small, the state is small and the ratio will be likely to be lower.
But amongst the top 10 states, 6, 7 state, the ratio is likely to be in the same 10%, 12% range is what we think will happen.
Okay. And just on the branch and number of districts. So we are seeing that we have covered 11 districts of the shares branches are just 6. So how are we managing [indiscernible]?
So it's a large state, and we are expanding gradually. And like I mentioned, the single branch caters to nearby areas as well. So it can cater to multiple locations. So the branch is not the only point of distribution point. It can cater to multiple distribution point. A single branch can cater to multiple distribution points across districts also. So that's probably the multiple locations.
So yes, that's okay, but as I could see a trend from all the different states versus branches and compared to every time the branches are higher, of course, than the district. So multiple branches maybe more than 1 names certain district in other states versus compared to as I can see that 11 districts are compared to the 6 branches.
So is it feasible that like -- I'm not sure how -- are we doing a fact check for those people who we are disbursing. Is it totally technology-driven? Or is it some kind that we are physically -- the person is site [indiscernible] is done in thing? So how are we doing in like just 10 districts, whereas our branch is in different districts. So are we really able to do the know-how of the place? Or is it just a little bit riskier that we are?
No, no, it's not. It's just -- I think you're just seeing the starting point because we have just started our expansion into UP. So we generally have what we call it protocol which we follow, which is we start with a person going into a new location. So that's the -- we call it a digital branch. And then it becomes a virtual branch or a proposed branch where we start looking out for a new branch premises.
So we are in that early stage in UP. And in the coming years, you will see that this number converges, as you have seen in other places. So a number of branches will be either equal to or overtake the number of districts in due course, because right now we are at an early stage because many of the branches are in the digital or digital work virtual stage. So that's where you're seeing the number of branches being smaller than the number of districts.
Next question is from the line of Jigar Jani from BNK Securities.
Congrats on a good set of numbers. Just one question of clarification. Your guidance on yield of 13.5% cost of borrowing as on IGAAP, or is it ex co-ending IGAAP?
This is essentially on AUM. So it will be on IGAAP.
So essentially, you were saying that this will probably IGAAP issue. Yes. So on an I-GAAP basis.
the number that we disclosed on an IGAAP basis.
So IGAAP basis your cost of borrowing is 8.3 because you see in your fact sheet as of Q4, which you are saying probably will end up in the next 2 quarters at 8.5 because there could be a point increase whereas you are guiding towards 13.5, is my understanding correct for this number?
That is right. But the number I'm referring to on the spread guidance is ex of co-lending. So the number you need to anchor to is 13.6.
Okay. And for the cost of borrowing also, I need to anchor to 8.3 [ billion ]?
Yes, exactly.
Next question is from the line of Gaurav Sharma from HSBC.
So on disbursement outlook, I just wanted to understand whether you last talking grow faster or it will be similar overall for FY '25?
Sorry, can you repeat the question, Gaurav?
Yes. Sir, my question is on the disbursement for that segment. So that segment in discussion we at a similar the cost segment overall disbursement or will grow faster in FY '25. Can you do some color [indiscernible]?
Not substantially different. It will -- I mean, like we said -- we are trying to increase or we will gradually increase the lab share. So it might have a slightly higher growth rate than housing loans, but not very significantly different.
Okay. And AUM also the investor in [indiscernible], right?
Yes. AUM growth overall, we are targeting a 30% AUM growth. So again, maybe a slight, I mean because last is currently, it's only about 13% of our book, 13%, 14% of our book.
So I mean the AUM growth in LAP will look a little higher. But overall, we are targeting a 13% growth -- 30% growth.
Next question is from the line of Varun, an individual investor.
Just wanted to check why do we have so much of cash balance on our balance sheet this quarter and even in the last quarter?
So it's close to around 2 to 2.5 months of disbursement that we have been keeping. Now this is something that we started write up trial of is crisis and then we and maintained these sort of balances.
What also happens is the number that you look at is the end of the quarter number where we take most drawdowns towards the end of the quarter. So that our overall interest cost is managed, and we also are able to manage banks in terms of broad periodic drawdown.
So the average cash holding will be slightly lower than what you end up seeing. So those 2, I think, would be how I would like to explain this [indiscernible].
Okay. So should we expect this to remain at a similar level going forward? Or should we expect it to go down in the coming quarters?
Not immediately, I would say, but perhaps 12 months from now, one on the liquidity situation in the overall market improves, we are fully covered as far as our next rating upgrade is concerned. Then I think we definitely have a case for improvement here.
Next question is from the line of Harshit Porwal, our individual investor.
So my question is with respect to the percentage of cash salaried customers in the total salary book?
Sorry, we couldn't hear you.
Am I audible now?
Yes.
So my question is with respect to the cash that we persisted in the total salary book.
You mean formal salaries?
Cash salary? Cash salaries will be around, so out of the total, it will be around 20%, 25%. So within the salary, it will be maybe 30% plus.
Okay. So 30% plus. Any amount of construction finance on our book?
No, the residual of about INR 4 crores or so. I mean just transaction -- 2 loans which are left in the portfolio, [indiscernible]. The rest are all closed.
Next question is from the line of Raj Pate, an individual investor.
I just wanted what is the vision for next 5 years in terms of new products or new business line?
We want to stay focused on housing because we feel that there's a huge opportunity in housing for a dedicated housing finance company. And so our aim is to stay focused on housing and specialized in housing itself. And of course, the related products loan against property, et cetera, we will continue to offer. But otherwise, largely remain as a housing finance company and stay focused on housing.
Next question is from the line of Diviya Gupta from Latent Advisors.
Am I audible?
Yes.
Yes.
Yes, one data keeping question. For this quarter, how much was the write-off in absolute amount?
Around INR 2 crores.
INR 2 crores. Got it. And the collection efficiencies that you have mentioned in the presentation deck is based on the number of EMIs or the customers, what could be a collection efficiency from a cost perspective, given the ticket sizes are now vary, the EMI does not necessarily present deposit collection efficiency.
So [indiscernible]
Level of gross [indiscernible].
[indiscernible] in higher ticket [indiscernible] are the dealing count slightly lower than the lower tickets sales. So I will decide.
Would it be possible to give a number? Or do you want to keep it right now with you?
It will be -- see, it is not significantly different. So that is why we are not been publishing it. It's -- it will be very similar, marginal.[indiscernible]
Got it. Just one last question around BTs. How much of our origination is coming in from balance transfers?
Less than 1%.
Less than 1%. Got it. And similar to the -- in the similar entity balance and so you mentioned that, let's say, till 20 bps, you are comfortable in taking it in your P&L and not pass it on to the customer. Now let's say, the overall increase happens 30 bps. So when you pass on, ultimately pass on the interest rate hike, do you pass this, [indiscernible]or do you pass 30 bps? I'll tell you, [indiscernible]the origination of the question is that certain 30 bps will affect our customers IT much more, which might lead to a higher incidence of balance transfer because others will just say that 10 basis point high has happened. But for us, Home First customer has become 30 bps. So does it play any role in the psyche of customers leading to BT out?
See, we have -- the last time when there was an increase, rate increase we passed on 25 basis points and then 50 basis points, 50 basis points. So a total of 125 basis points was passed on. So I guess -- see anywhere between 25 to 50 basis points can be passed on to the customer. So I guess if we see as of now, we are running a deficit of 20 basis points. So I think your question is, let us say, the rates go by another 120 basis points, whether we'll pass on 20 or whether we'll pass on 40, I think we is the question. I think the answer to that will be less on 25 basis points and lead the 15 [indiscernible]2.
So it all depends upon how the rates move and how sharply they move. I mean they were to move much more sharply, which is unlikely. So let's say, remove by, say, another 30 or 40 basis points, and we may have to pass on 50 basis points at one go. So it all depends upon how the rates move.
Got it. And given this will be last time and we were passing on rate hikes and we were also doing it, [indiscernible] was not the only player who was asking on 3 sites. So that was customers didn't necessarily have a big option to go to another and doing a predatory pricing. But now why are we -- the other players are increasingly rate. So why aren't we taking that hike?
So we have had an ideology that we don't want to change the rates too many times for the customer. Frequently changing the rates to the customer not only agitate the customer, but it's also upset their planning, et cetera, which is why we want to hold on to the rate as much as possible. So which is under there is a serious increase, we don't want to pass it on. We want to stable -- keep it stable for the customer. It's just a good fair practice for us as the customers.
Got it. And just one last question. So when the rate increase actually happened, do you increase the [indiscernible] or do you increase the EMI keeping the tenure constant?
We always increase the tenure so that the budget is not -- budget does not get [indiscernible]So the tenure -- our first attempt is always to increase the tenure. Unless the tenure crosses a certain limit in which case, we have to then change the [indiscernible].
EMI. Got it. Understood.
Next question is from the line of Abishek, an individual investor.
Hope I'm audible.
Yes.
Yes.
Other question pertains to, I think, in the earlier years, management has spoken that there is reversal of provisions for the year and leading to the lower OpEx to OEM ratio. So that will be pertained to the employee expense, I guess, and not the provisions. Am I right?
Yes, we also take certain employee-related books around [indiscernible] statements and related items, so more in that nature.
Sorry [indiscernible] breaking. Can you please repeat?
Yes, largely employee-related and expense-relatedprovisions.
Yes. And the provisions, lower provisions for the quarters that goes, I think earlier, the CFO [indiscernible] regarding the other write-back of the recovery has been booked in the provisions and the lower provisions for the quarter.
Credit Loss. Credit losses. It pertain to the lower credit losses.
Yes. So you do not -- you're not booking the other income part, you book in the provision part.
Credit cost.
Yes.
Lower line item in the P&L [indiscernible] may just before the PBT provision for lower. So that is the lower is because of the recovery we have booked.
Yes. Yes. The recoveries have been passed in the credit cost line.
That is lower -- yes. The recoveries from the write-offs is the reason for the lower credit cost. The lower operating expenses because of certain other provisions on the employee side, employee et cetera, which there were some provisions which have been or we have got rid of it. So that is the reason for the reduction in [indiscernible]. Those 2 are different.
As there are no further questions, I would now like to hand the conference to Mr. Manoj Vishwanathan for closing comments. Over to you, sir.
Thank you. We are confident to continue the growth momentum led by a strong economic environment, expanding [indiscernible] network and differentiated business model.
We continue to stay focused on providing loans for affordable housing led by distribution and [indiscernible] technology and backed by diverse funding and strong risk management. Thank you, everyone, for joining on the call. I hope we have been able to answer all your queries. In case you require any further details, you may please get in touch with Manish Kayal. Thank you very much.
Thank you. On behalf of Home First Finance Company Limited, that concludes this conference. Thank you for joining us, and you may now disconnect your lines.