Delhivery Ltd
NSE:DELHIVERY
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
327.3
473.15
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Summary
Q2-2025
In Q2 FY25, Delhivery achieved INR 2,190 crores in revenue, reflecting a 13% year-on-year growth. The Express Parcel business remained stable with 185 million consignments, while the Part Truckload (PTL) business excelled, showing a 27% increase in revenue to INR 474 crores. Profit After Tax (PAT) improved to INR 10 crores, marking a significant recovery from last year's loss of INR 103 crores. Service EBITDA margins for the Express business decreased to 15.1% from 18.2% due to capacity investments ahead of the festive season, but no structural changes were noted. Looking ahead, the company expresses confidence in achieving growth despite market challenges, primarily aiming for a 15-20% revenue growth in Express when conditions stabilize.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Hi. Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the Q2 FY '25 Earnings Call of Delhivery Limited hosted by Macquarie.
Before we start, Delhivery would like to point out that some of the statements made in today's call may be forward-looking in nature and a disclaimer to this effect has been included in the earnings presentation shared with you earlier. Kindly note that this call is meant for investors and analysts only. If there are representatives from the media, they are requested to kindly drop off this call immediately.
To discuss the results, I am pleased to welcome Mr. Sahil Barua, MD and CEO; Mr. Amit Agarwal, CFO; and Mr. Vivek Pabari, Head of Investor Relations at Delhivery.
[Operator Instructions]
I thank the management team for providing Macquarie the opportunity to host the call. And now I invite Mr. Sahil Barua to take us through the key highlights of the quarter, post which we will open up for Q&A. Thank you, and over to you, Sahil.
Thank you, Baidu. Thank you, Cheryl, for hosting us. A very good evening to all of you who've joined our earnings call this evening. As always, I'll begin with a short presentation on financial and operational performance for quarter 2. We'll keep this short and then happy to take your questions.
Broadly, as a headline before we begin, quarter 2 is when Delhivery sets up for the festive season. As many of you are aware, quarter 3 is the peak season for online commerce. And typically, this is the quarter in which we expand capacities across real estate, people and vehicles in preparation for the peak season.
Overall, before we get into the numbers, as a broad summary, this is our second consecutive quarter of PAT profitability. Overall as a business, our Express business continued to be stable and well set up. And our Part Truckload business has continued to show robust growth quarter-on-quarter into quarter 2 as well.
Quick snapshot of numbers for quarter 2. Revenues came in at INR 2,190 crores, which is a year-on-year growth of about 13% and broadly flattish quarter-on-quarter. We delivered 185 million consignments in our core e-commerce Express Parcel business. Industry standards on this, of course, vary, some players also declare return shipments separately, including returns. Our total volumes stand at 216 million consignments as of quarter 2 fiscal '25, which is a year-on-year growth of about 3% and quarter-on-quarter of about 2%.
In terms of overall freight tonnage, we delivered 427,000 tons of Part Truck freight in quarter 2. This continues to be industry-leading growth. Year-on-year, our volumes have grown by about 23% and quarter-on-quarter PTL volumes have grown 7%. Overall EBITDA came in at INR 57 crores, which is a positive EBITDA of 3% as compared to a negative EBITDA of INR 16 crores for the same quarter in the last financial year and as opposed to INR 97 crores in Q1 of fiscal '25. PAT for Q2 came in at INR 10 crores broadly breakeven as compared to a PAT loss of INR 103 crores in the same quarter in the last financial year and a PAT of INR 54 crores in quarter 1. Overall, the company continues to be highly well capitalized. We continue to have INR 5,488 crores of cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet.
Quick snapshot of overall operating metrics as usual. Pin code reach continues to be at 18,775 pin codes. Please note, this is on the base of 19,300 pin codes as defined by the Indian post when orders are received for pin code outside of what is defined by the Indian Post, we convert them into India Post compatible pin codes. We continue to service 220 countries through our partnerships with FedEx and Aramex.
We've had a significant growth overall in terms of number of active customers across all of our business lines. We continue to grow strongly in the SME and D2C segments in e-commerce and obviously continue to add new customers in the PTL business. Total customer base stands at 38,000 customers as of quarter 2 as compared to 35,000 customers in quarter 1 and 30,000 customers from a year ago. Year-on-year growth of nearly 30%.
Overall, infrastructure grew from 18.73 million square feet of real estate to 19.49 million square feet of real estate as of the end of quarter 2. This includes, by the way, 0.5 million square feet of real estate that is extremely -- that's on extremely short-term leases essentially purely for the e-commerce peak season. Adjusting for that infrastructure across the network remain broadly stable between quarter 1 and quarter 2.
Total number of gateways, including processing centers have stood broadly consent between quarter 2 fiscal '24 and quarter 2 fiscal '25, at a sum of about 278. So I'm adding the row for gateways and the row for processing centers.
Automated sortation centers grew marginally from 42 ASCs as of Q1 fiscal '25 to 45 ASCs as of Q2. Total number of parcels orders increased from 61 to 66. There was a marginal increase in freight service centers from 120 to 124 including a couple of freight centers that were commissioned purely for the peak season. Express delivery centers and partner centers continue to remain broadly constant from 4,400 to about 4,450.
There was a mild amount of increase in the team size, partner agents and fleet size towards the end of quarter 2, specifically. Team size grew from 67,900 to about 73,800 in preparation for the peak season. And overall fleet size grew from 15,800 to about 16,400 on average in prep for the peak season.
In terms of overall financial performance, year-on-year, we've seen revenue growth of 13% from INR 1,942 crores in quarter 2 fiscal '24 to INR 2,190 crores in quarter 2 of fiscal '25 with the quarter-on-quarter growth being broadly flat. Express continues to remain, obviously, the core business and forms about 59% of total revenues.
The PTL business continues to grow as a percentage of total revenues and in volume terms and now forms 22% of revenues as of Q2 fiscal '25. 7% of the business comes from the truckload business and 9% from the Supply Chain Services business.
In terms of individual business lines, the Express Parcel business has grown 7% in revenue terms year-on-year from INR 1,210 crores in Q2 fiscal '24 to INR 1,298 crores in Q2 of fiscal '25. Overall, volumes have remained broadly flattish in the 180 million range. Q2 fiscal '25 close at 185 million packages delivered. Including RTOs, overall volumes have stood at about 216 million as of Q2 fiscal '25.
The Part Truckload business continues to show robust growth. We continue to have industry-leading growth in this business and our investments in building the sales team that we began about 5 quarters ago, continues to reap dividends. Trade revenues have actually grown 27% year-on-year from INR 373 crores in Q2 fiscal '24 to INR 474 crores in Q2 fiscal '25, which also represents a 9% growth quarter-on-quarter. Overall Part Truck freight tonnage grew 23% between Q2 fiscal '24 and Q2 fiscal '25 and 7% quarter-on-quarter. Yield growth, therefore, has also happened year-on-year. The Truckload business has remained broadly flat at INR 150 crores of externalized freight. Year-on-year growth is about 5% and quarter-on-quarter 2%.
The Supply Chain Services business has grown 21% year-on-year from INR 164 crores in Q2 fiscal '24 to INR 197 crores in Q2 fiscal '25. As you're aware, Q2 is typically a seasonal down quarter for our consumer durables clients. Despite that, we've seen very significant growth in this business, continue to have a highly robust pipeline of clients who we expect will begin operations in Q3 and Q4. So well positioned in this business overall.
The cross-border services business has grown 43% between Q2 fiscal '24 and Q2 FY '25 from INR 41 crores to INR 59 crores. In terms of service line profitability, the overall revenue from services stood at INR 2,190 crores. Overall service EBITDA came in at 9.3% in Q2 fiscal '25, which is about INR 203 crores of service EBITDA versus 11.9% in Q1 fiscal '25 or INR 258 crores, largely due to investments in capacity that are due just before the peak season and also as a consequence of some infrastructure going live in Q2.
The Express Parcel business service EBITDA margins were at 15.1% for Q2 fiscal '25 at INR 196 crores as compared to 18.2% in Q1, again, largely driven by expansion of capacity in preparation for the peak season.
Part Truckload remained broadly stable at INR 14 crores of service EBITDA in Q2 fiscal '25 or about 3%. And Supply Chain Services declined from INR 11 crores of service EBITDA in Q1 to negative INR 9 crores in Q2 fiscal '25, largely due to a one-time provision as part of a contractual agreement with 1 of our clients.
Overall, corporate overheads declined from INR 221 crores to INR 193 crores, again, going largely to a onetime adjustment, which is a reversal of a provision taken in a prior period and stood at 8.8% of overall revenues. All other corporate overheads remain broadly stable.
In terms of adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA stood at INR 10 crores versus INR 37 crores in Q1 fiscal '25, a change of 1.2% and overall PAT at INR 10 crores as opposed to INR 54 crores in quarter 1 fiscal '25.
So a quick snapshot of PAT evolution over the last 10 quarters. As you can see, overall PAT has continued to improve year-on-year. Quarter 2 fiscal '25 was our second consecutive positive back quarter coming in INR 10 crores as opposed to INR 54 crores in quarter 1 fiscal '25 but a huge improvement versus quarter 2 fiscal '24, which had an overall PAT loss of INR 103 crores. We anticipate that the rest of the year will continue in the same vein.
In terms of overall quarterly financial performance as a summary. Revenue from services, as I mentioned, came in at INR 2,190 crores. Including other income, total income came in at INR 2,309 crores, which is a growth of 13% year-on-year compared to INR 2,043 crores in Q2, and a quarter-on-quarter growth of 1.2%. Overall expenses, lagged growth in revenue. Total expenses stood at INR 2,294 crores, which is a year-on-year growth of 6.8% and a quarter-on-quarter growth of 3.2%, leading to a net PAT of INR 10 crores in Q2 fiscal '25 versus negative INR 103 crores in the same quarter last year and INR 54 crores in Q1, and a total EBITDA of INR 57 crores or 2.6% for Q2 versus negative INR 16 crores for Q4 fiscal '24 and INR 97 crores in Q1 fiscal '25.
The working capital position continues to improve across the board. As you can see, our net working capital days as of the end of September '24 stood at 22 days versus 27 days as of March '24. Receivable days continued to reduce from 62 days as of March '24 to 59 days and payable days increased from 35 days to 37 days.
So in summary, Q2 is -- has been a fairly stable quarter set us up well for the peak season in October and November, continued to be PAT profitable for us overall despite onetime adjustments that had to be made in Supply Chain Services business. And overall, the PTL business continued to grow at industry-leading growth of 27%. Express broadly flat.
With that, happy to take questions.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take the first question from Sachin Salgaonkar.
I have 3 questions. First question, Sahil, is on Express margins, even when we look from Q2 to Q2 margins have gone down from 18% to 15%. Can you help us understand what has happened and how should 1 look at the steady state margin going ahead?
Sure. Do you want to ask all your 3 questions?
Yes, sure. My second question is we are hearing mixed feedback on festive season in terms of how it is picking up. So I would love to understand how you guys are seeing an impact on the festive season.
And lastly is on the Express growth. I mean it may not be easy for you guys but it would be great if you could take a stab at this. How much of the weakness is perhaps on the back of consumption slowdown and how much because of an in-sourcing by operator? And I'm asking that question because I want to get a sense in terms of what could be a growth for a 3PL industry going ahead when things normalize?
Sure. Let me try and answer each of them. First, quickly on margins, Sachin, if you look at the service EBITDA margins for the Express business, Q2 has come in at 15.1% versus 18.2% in Q1. But if you look at the previous financial year, Q1 to Q2 was 18.1% versus 16.8%. So there is typically a decline in the service EBITDA margins in quarter 2 in the Express business. Last year, the peak season was slightly delayed compared to this financial year. And so some of the capacity commitments would have come slightly better. So they would have come between the end of Q2 and the start of Q3, whereas this time, a larger percentage of the capacity investments that happened in Q2 because the peak season actually began in the last week of September.
So I think September 26, if I'm not mistaken, was exactly when the peak season began. So that's part of the reason why there's a delta. Overall, if I look at our capacity investments, broadly speaking, about between INR 10 crores and INR 12 crores would have been the impact in September alone of the capacity investments between the 2 financial years. And so when you add that back, broadly, the Q2 fiscal '25 margins for the Express business would be in line more or less with what we saw in fiscal '24 overall. So no structural change to the margins in the Express business overall. I think we expect to continue to make service EBITDA margins overall in the range of that 17%, 18% in Express even going forward.
Second question was in terms of the festive season. I think overall, if I look at our October numbers, our closure for the October period has stood at about 78 million consignments, which is about -- if I take an average of -- I mean, just as an average of 185 million, so let's say, 61 million. So October alone, we've seen a growth of 30% in shipment closures in the peak period. And obviously, there'll be some spillover effect that goes into November as well. So overall, I think we're pretty satisfied with the way peak season has played out. Obviously, it also means a certain amount of share. We are the largest network in Express. And typically, we're the largest and highest quality network, and so volume does tend to flow a little differentially into the largest and highest-quality network at this time. So our growth at 30%, I think, is broadly pretty solid. And in line, if I'm not mistaken, with what at least our clients seem to have projected.
In terms of express growth across the industry, I think that's a complicated question. I think if you look at it, the bulk of the insourcing related growth bank, and obviously, here, you're referring to Valmo. I think a large bulk of that has already been experienced in terms of the growth of Valmo because I think in the last financial year, there was very significant growth overall in Valmo's overall contribution to Meesho's volumes.
So I think outsourcing has a relatively smaller sort of impact this year as compared to what it did last year. I think broadly on e-commerce, as we see it, there is an overhang from just consumption being softer overall. But so far, if I look at our numbers for October and the early part of November, I think we seem pretty satisfied.
Got it. So whenever consumption recovery -- when consumption recovers, we should see growth normalizing to 13% to 15% for industry, right?
I think that's one. But I'll also take this opportunity for a minute. See, I think the other thing from our standpoint, as I mentioned before, is that we will now start accelerating efforts to increase our share even if the market does continue to remain slightly sluggish. There were a couple of things that I've referred to in past earnings calls, which we are starting to ramp up now that the peak season is over. So 1 of them, for example, is obviously, this will take a little longer to play out but we will, for instance, launch a third-party shared e-commerce network for e-commerce for e-commerce brands. And we do expect that to increase volumes in the major cities. That's one.
The second is we're in the process of launching a faster product for regional surface shipping and national air shipping. So as both of these kickoff, I think we again will have the ability to drive incremental share. Some of this has taken time for us to negotiate. But with our overall buying scale and our overall network scale, I think we're very confident that this also leads to incremental volumes.
The third is also as our PTL business has grown I've mentioned in the past, we see opportunities in specific lanes to significantly sort of pass on efficiency benefits to some of our customers, which will be more than rewarded for by the yields because these would typically be long distance orders. And so we will sort of grow overall share even in these subsegments.
And the fourth is, I think, as we expand from a product standpoint, Delhivery One, which is the panel that we use for D2C customers and for SME customers. There's a whole bunch of value-added services that also will go live in this quarter which include 3 things really, 1 of them is the address disambiguation service, the other is the RTO reduction service, and the third will be insurance. All 3 of which we also anticipate will increase yields on the Express business.
And the fourth is we're also in the process of figuring out how to launch a much larger aggregator reseller franchise business, physical franchise business across the country. So think of sort of what a D2C has historically done. I think we've discovered that large numbers of customers who want to ship with Delhivery but don't have access to a physical point, especially SMEs. So as we expand that, I think, irrespective of market remaining sluggish, we're going to be pushing the pedal on growth form here.
We'll take the next question from Sachin Dixit. Okay. I don't see Sachin in the queue. We'll take the next question from Aditya Bhartia.
Sahil, am I audible?
Yes, Aditya. Please go ahead.
Perfect. Sahil, my first question is on volume growth that we have seen in the Express business. This time around, we had an earlier Diwali and despite that, we are looking at a 3% kind of revenue growth, while the numbers that you are sharing about for October are looking fairly encouraging. So how is it that the growth has been so muted entirely on account of consumption slowdown because you're saying that in-sourcing has also not really contributed much this year?
So I think, first of all, the Diwali, this thing comes in on the 26th of September overall. So, which is why the bulk of the growth that we see volumes is sitting in October, and not in the previous quarter. I think in the previous quarter, even historically, if you go back ever since we've been running Delhivery, the reality is that quarter 2 has generally been fairly flattish as compared to quarter 1. The real growth really comes in, in quarter 3. So even overall industry volumes between quarter 1 and quarter 2, my senses have not increased dramatically when you take the industry as a whole.
In fact, I believe one of the captives has also declared their financial results even for the previous financial year for fiscal '24. And you can see that overall growth in revenue and overall growth in volumes consequently is unlikely to be very significant. I think the quarter 2 to quarter 2 growth in e-commerce overall has not been sort of as significant. Quarter 3, of course, as I mentioned, October, we've grown 30%. And I think that's a very positive sign. Also I think in quarter 1 and quarter 2, there would also have been given the fact that we've had challenging weather conditions and so on, the impact of quick commerce on some of the volumes in certain categories and also have been slightly larger. Overall, not a very big surprise that quarter 2 versus quarter 1 has remained broadly flattish.
On the in-sourcing, I think our point is very simple, the 2 largest players, obviously, which are Flipkart and Amazon, there hasn't been a very significant change in terms of their in-sourcing strategy. In any case, they've been in-sourcing a fairly significant percentage. My point was really that on the third player in the face the bulk of the actions that would have affected the third-party industry would have happened in the previous financial year. I think we've said this in the past and this kind of a network, scaling the initial sort of period is not very difficult but incremental scale sort of for becomes small. So the bulk of the impact would really have been in the Jan, Feb, March period for Q4 of the last financial year. We don't think that it will have as significant impact going forward.
Sure. And sir, this 30% growth that we have had versus 3 previous period, how has this number generally been in the past few years? And post Diwali, do we see a bit of a slowdown, a bit of a lull in volumes?
It's been very variable over the last several years, to be honest, last year would have been broadly almost in the same sort of range, 30% peak to nonpeak period. But to be honest, the e-commerce market was in its infancy, these numbers used to be as high as 50%, 60%. But we've also seen a couple of years where this has been lowered by. So I think 30%, the way I would look at it is broadly par for the course. Has there been a slowdown after the peak period?
Compared to the peak period, obviously. But broadly speaking, I think so far, we're okay well on November. One of the things that we are obviously benefited by a little bit and where we are seeing an improvement in our position in the market is that our overall volumes on heavier packages have actually increased even more. As I brought up multiple times in the past we are more or less the only carrier who can handle heavy consignments, especially among third-party carriers. It's a unique specialty of Delhivery and that's largely obviously because we run the PTL business. And our heavy volumes actually have improved fairly significantly both through right at the end of September but also in October and November.
And actually, this is the strategic capability that we're going to be pushing even more. Obviously, a large part of this in the Diwali period is for things like consumer durables, refrigerators, air conditioners, furniture, et cetera. But post the peak, what we will continue to push on is really growth in everything that weighs more than 3 kilograms, which is really a very large sort of overall market subsegment.
Understood. And sorry, just 1 clarification. You mentioned that post Diwali, our volumes are roughly similar to how they typically are pre-festive period. So assuming roughly, let's say, 60 million of monthly sales in November, December, if I 78 million for October, we are speaking about almost 200-odd million volumes, which is again going to be kind of flattish year-on-year. So are those the kind of trends that you're currently seeing that the growth is somewhat missing because of weak consumer sentiment?
I don't know, hard to say because right now, if I look at our numbers, we are well positioned. I think we will grow compared to the same quarter in the last year. Like I said, there are also a number of other conversations, which have been ongoing with our clients where a lot of these conversations get consummated in this period -- in this 2-month period because this is the moment when e-commerce companies really start sort of thinking about the next calendar year, next financial year as well. Like I said, we have -- our objectives are cut out, we're going to increase share overall on heavies. We're going to increase our overall share on regional surface. We're going to increase our overall share regional -- on national air as well.
So as we do these things, let's see how they play out in November, December. But if those play out well, then no reason why we shouldn't keep growth compared to the same quarter last year. But overall, I think more in the e-commerce industry, you've heard this commentary from FMCG companies now already, that there has been a softness in consumption. And I think we'd be foolish to think that it wouldn't affect e-commerce as well over a period of time. So I think the consumption slowdown is real. I think its impact on the e-commerce industry is real.
From a Delhivery standpoint, though, I think we've been biding our time stabilizing our operations, making sure margins are stable, capacity investments coming in line, increasing the share of LTL. And now that we have many of these factors in place, we will push the pedal on e-commerce growth as well even if the market doesn't grow, we have that ability.
[Operator Instructions] We'll take the next question from Gaurav Rateria.
Am I audible?
Yes, Gaurav. Please go ahead.
I have actually a couple of questions. I will just maybe state all my questions and in respect of time, whatever you can answer, please. The first question is on PTL margins. So I understand that capacity creation would have impacted margins in Express Parcel in 2Q. But why, despite a good Q-on-Q growth rate, PTL margins have remained stable quarter-on-quarter?
The second question is on Express margins on a year-on-year basis. Is that decline primarily because last year, the capacity creation investments were more around 3Q and this time, it is more around 2Q? Is that a reason why the margins on a Y-o-Y look down for Express Parcel?
The third question is around the customer-specific impact. You sounded very confident that this has stabilized. What drives that confidence?
And the last question is that theoretically, if Express Parcel volume were to remain in sub double-digit, like 8%, 10% growth, do you think that our corporate overheads are geared to kind of handle that kind of a growth? Because I understand that our corporate overheads are geared to handle much higher revenue growth. So is there a room to kind of relook at our corporate overheads if that continues for a little bit longer?
Sure. Thanks. I'll try and do this as quickly as I can. On the PTL margins, very quickly, the PTL shares the network with Express and heavy as well. And so in that sense, there isn't sort of an isolated PTL margin that we report overall. So when capacity is expanded for the network, capacity is expanded overall for the entire network as a whole. And so PTL has to bear some of the costs of expanding the network for Express and heavy, right? So that's sort of broadly the reason why PTL margins on its -- on their own have not increased. So when we expand, for example, a gateway or when we expand fleet capacity, part of that cost also gets attributed to the PTL network, given that we run a totally integrated network because as an example, out of this network also service is heavy.
On Express margins year-on-year, the largest impact is fundamentally because of the capacity expansion for the peak period. There are always -- between any given set of quarters, there's always a little bit of variation that comes from client mix. But other than that, broadly speaking, the impact is largely because this is also 1 smaller factor. It's not a very, very large factor, but again, a couple of basis points, it takes or differences. If you remember, airlines had introduced a specific surcharge in the period of September and October for airfreight. So that would also have had a small impact on September this year, which is somewhat new. Now some of this, we've obviously passed on to our customers downstream as well that will reflect in October as well.
In terms of customer-specific impact, look, I think the -- like I mentioned in the past, specifically with the third player in the space. I think the reality is Delhivery is the lowest cost player in this space, and our delivery outcomes are better, right? That's reflected not just in our overall volumes. That's reflected in the share of the market that we command outside of the top 3 players as well. And we have an extremely large share of the market that is not the top 3 marketplaces. And so deliveries quality of service and deliveries cost in that sense are very, very clearly established.
Given that, whether it's the 2 big marketplaces or Meesho in that regard, I think having Delhivery as a strong third strategic partner is in the interest of every platform, right? It's not inimical to the interests of any of the 3 marketplaces to have a large, stable, diversified, low-cost, high-quality logistics company as their partner. And so I think the reality is nobody benefits by reducing our overall share.
The second thing is that we don't have the client concentration that the other 3PLs in this space have, right? Most of them are dependent precisely on 1 or 2 clients. And so when you're dependent on only 1 or 2 clients, managing peaks becomes much harder and especially when you only run an express business. One of the reasons why the peaks affect us a little less than they do any other 3PL in this space is because we have the ballast of the PTL business and the heavy business, both of which allow us to establish more stable capacities and more stable service levels. And so in that regard, like I said, there's absolutely no benefit to any of the players to really not having Delhivery as the dominant partner that they need to have outside of self-logistics. So that's what gives me confidence that there's no reason for any of them to shift out of Delhivery.
In terms of Express, the industry remains a 8% to 10% growth, is there an opportunity to cut some amount of corporate overhead and I think that will certainly be the case. In any case, corporate overhead is something. If you look at it, we've remained stable for nearly 2 years. This is despite -- I mean, wages are about nearly half of that overall corporate overhead. So even with wages -- even with wage inflation being what it is, the reality is we've kept corporate overheads absolutely stable for 2 years. So we will continue to exercise the same judiciousness on corporate overheads. And of course, if it turns out that we believe that the e-commerce industry is not going to grow at all then we'll take -- not just the e-commerce industry. If there's any part of our business, which we believe is not going to grow at the rates that we expect, we will evaluate the corporate overheads.
With that said, what I do want to be clear, our aim is not to optimize the corporate overheads for a given size of business. It is to grow the business. So we would rather use the people that we have to go and aggressively build out the products that I've spoken about earlier, which is the new products we're building on Express, which is expanding the reach of our PTL business, which is expanding the quality of our Supply Chain Services business. So I think that it's not an immediate step but it is something that we evaluate in any case on an ongoing basis.
We'll take the next question from Achal Lohade.
First, in terms of the one-time provisions, if you could elaborate a little bit in Supply Chain as well as the corporate overheads reversal of what you kind of hinted.
Number two, the CapEx, how do we look at for FY '25 and '26 and which areas of the business?
And number three, if we exclude the in-sourcing part, what is the like-to-like growth year-to-date if you could have that number handy?
So let me quickly just answer -- give you a preview on answer question number 2 and also answer number 3, and then Amit CFO, will take over. Very quickly on like-for-like growth in -- if you exclude the chaps who have captives, the interesting thing is that our SME and D2C business, in fact, the SME business volumes year-on-year are up nearly 50%, and the D2C business will be up close to about -- nearly about 20% on volumes, right? As I mentioned several times before, 1 of the other things is we also choose fairly selectively, which clients we work with. So there are some clients, for example, where delivery performance is 20%, 30%, where effectively, we are required to act as extended sales arms where we don't work with them. So we exclude those entirely.
But in the core segments that we are bothered about, which is high-quality e-commerce companies, SME, D2C, et cetera, our growth has been pretty robust. And I think we've actually gained share in this period.
On CapEx, very quickly, I let Amit provide you a detailed answer. But in fact, I think on CapEx overall, we are ahead of where we had expected to be in terms of sort of CapEx as a percentage of revenue. There's been a very sharp drop in H1 overall. I think CapEx for H1 would have come in at close to about 6.6% of revenue. We expect the entire year to come in at broadly about 6.5% to 6.6%, 6.7%. And so overall, reducing the CapEx intensity of the business we're ahead on plan overall, and we expect this to continue pretty aggressively.
But I'll really let Amit sort of talk you through more detail on both the first question and the second. Amit, please go ahead.
Thanks, Sahil. Continuing on the CapEx part. Our CapEx investments continue to primarily go into the areas of tractor trailers and automation and furniture fixture leasehold improvement inside the facilities. As we have indicated that trucking CapEx remains at -- right now at about 2% -- 2.1 percentage of revenue as we are in a catch-up phase to the steady-state tractor trailer penetration in our network. Once that's completed by end of this year, we should start tapering towards 1 to 1.1 percentage of revenue as trucking CapEx in the FY '26 period? You will again see improvement in automation plant and machinery furniture fixture in the next fiscal year as well. So we should be in the sub-6% range for FY '26 on the CapEx.
Going to the provisions aspect of quarter 4, there are 2 specifically one-offs. One was in a Supply Chain Services business, where we took inventory adjustment of about INR 10 odd-crores, it's a provision right now as we continue to audit our fulfillment centers and some of it, we may expect to reverse in the subsequent quarters. The other part is the INR 21 crores reversal on account of oxygen concentrators that we had purchased during the COVID time. These were imported from a foreign vendor who had entered into a contractual dispute with his back-to-back vendor because of which we had to provision this amount. However, over the period, we were able to make progress through negotiation and legal processes. And we have recovered INR 21 crore out of the INR 28 crores debt orders in October 2024. So for the same INR 21 crores has been -- the provision has been reversed to quarter 2 of FY '25. There is a INR 7 crore additional payment that we expect over next 4 to 6 quarters as per our agreed plan with them.
Sure. Just a clarification, you said you received the money in October. Have I understood right?
Yes.
And that's already reflected in September quarter number, right?
Yes. The provision has been reversed because it was only a provision.
We'll take the next question from Jainam Shah.
Am I audible?
Yes, please go ahead.
So this question is firstly related to the PTL segment. We are almost second or third largest company in terms of PTL in terms of volumes, where is our margins are it still at 3% or something? So what differentiates us in terms of margin from other players who are making, let's say, 10-plus and plus margin? And what kind of margin we can make, let's say, 10%, 13%, 14% going forward at what volume number we can be making those margins. So this is not related to the PTL, like it has, of course, progressed well from a negative 20% to positive 3%. But going forward, what would be the trajectory?
And second question would be on the e-commerce slowdown. What would be your view? Is this quick commerce impacting the e-commerce? Or is it overall consumption slowdown or going forward also, let's from -- let's take it from next 2 to 3 years angle. Is it quick commerce becoming , you can say, a substitute for the e-commerce and which can eventually impact us going forward as well?
Sure. On PTL margin trajectory, I think, first of all, I think you've already pointed it out, there's been absolutely sequential and continuous improvement in the overall margins of the PTL business from negative 20% to positive 3%, which is where we are right now. As I mentioned in the past, the difference between us and other players in this industry is our appetite for growth. We've grown 27% year-on-year in revenue terms and 23% in terms of volumes. I think if you added up the rest of the listed players in the PTL space, broadly speaking, while I don't remember the exact numbers but growth would be fairly close to 0 overall, for everyone put together. And I think that's the difference.
So where we do absolutely constrain the PTL network to say we don't wish to do any tonnage larger than 425,000 tonnes, reflecting the margins would not necessarily be very difficult. We would just have to downsize freight service stations, downside hubs and so on. That's it, as I mentioned this before I think India is a market where there's massive amounts of spend by enterprises across the board on freight. And as markets mature, the reality is that a part of the market does shift towards Express, Part Truckload freight. Our belief is that any company that's not investing in building capacity for India's growth in freight volumes is actually not making the right decision. It is the only way for costs to ultimately reduce for overall supply chains in India to be optimized correctly.
So we will continue to invest for growth in the PTL business. The margins in the PTL business will continue to expand as overall volumes go up, obviously because the incremental growth in capacity is not that large. We do think that PTL margins will mirror the Express margins as the business continues to mature. We've already gone from minus 20% to plus 3% in a fairly short period of time. And we think as volumes go up, we will go from plus 3% to the plus 16%, plus 17% sort of range that we have in Express as well.
The other interesting thing, of course, in PTL unlike in Express is that the dynamics of the market are fundamentally different. In the Express industry, the reality is that part of the reason why, if you look at the overall profitability for the Express industry, it's negative, Delhivery, while we are profitable and significantly so on the Express side, even if you include the captive, as I mentioned, 1 of the captives has released their financial results for fiscal '24, which shows a 5x increase in loss. And when you include all of the captives and you include even the other third-party players, the net profitability is likely to be barely 0 or negative for all of them put together. The reality in the express industry is that there are too many players.
In the PTL space, of course, the difference is that there are few places. The market remains highly unorganized. The total organized players in this space, Safexpress, Delhivery, VRL, Gati, we all have the ability to grow into this market while continuing to increase margins. All of us, not just Delhivery alone. So I think that's going to be our strategy. I think we will get to the Express level margins as the business grows. Now whether it takes us exactly 3 quarters or 4 or 5 quarters, that will depend on sort of how volumes come in.
In terms of quick commerce and its impact on e-commerce, I've said this in the past. I know this isn't necessarily the most popular opinion. But the reality is that quick commerce is impacting kiranas. The reality is that its impact on e-commerce is not as large as its impact is broadly on larger retail ecosystem. When somebody is buying vegetables or fruits, buying a pack of cigarettes online, using a quick commerce app that's not something they're buying on Flipkart or on Amazon or on -- for that matter Meesho, where they're buying plastic products and home improvement products and so on. So fundamental SKUs are also different to a large extent, across the broader world of e-commerce and quick commerce.
I think there will be -- in a few cases, there will be marginal impact on e-commerce, certainly in the beauty and personal care space, there will be a demand for some products certainly. Contact lens solution, for example, is that something that should come to you my quick commerce application? Why not? But if you say 20,000 SKUs of BPC can we reliably, do it through quick commerce, the answer is no. And I think the reality is it's also getting slowly recognized by the quick commerce form. Because if you go from 15-minute delivery to 4-hour delivery saying that we want to do a bigger range of SKUs and larger warehouses, you are essentially reverse engineering a warehouse. So it's not quick commerce anymore, 1 more step and you're reinventing an Amazon fulfillment center, which already exists and is highly efficient.
So I'm not sure that the impact of quick commerce and e-commerce will be as significant. I think even as quick commerce expanded total number of SKUs, it's going to look a lot like e-commerce. And in e-commerce, the advantages that the existing players have large, entrenched advantages as well. So I think it will be interesting to see how that plays out. We're not particularly worried.
And from our standpoint, look, irrespective of what happens, we will launch a third-party quick commerce service in any case. Obviously, not to do something like 15- and 20-minute delivery because we don't believe that's necessary for all categories of products. But we will launch a third-party service. We are in the process of piloting the launch of this in Bengaluru with 1 of our key BPC partners. And the advantage with us obviously is that we not only service the quick commerce requirements, we service their overall requirements pan-India, and not just for B2C, but in this case, even for B2B.
And so there's a lot of logic for companies in the space to partner with Delhivery to solve their problems for national e-commerce shipping, national B2B shipping, air shipping and quick commerce. And so irrespective, we will launch ourselves. The only part that we will not play in obviously, is 15-minute deliveries of cigarettes or 15-minute deliveries of food and so on the highly low AOV kind of segment in this market.
Got it, sir. Just a follow-up on the first question. Of course, we are having a very strong growth in the PTL segment where rest of the players have struggled. I wondered your view on the pricing of ours as compared to the competitors, and there have been few price increase taken by the competitors. Is it eventually leading to our volume growth? Or we are also planning some price increase in terms of like while reaching from 3% to 15%, 16% ? Are we factoring any pricing? Or is it just you can say, more of a capacity utilization and eventually leading to better margins?
So, Jainam, it's interesting that you pointed out. So yes, some of our competitors have passed price increases in the PTL space. We also have passed some price increases in some parts of the PTL space, where we felt that we were underpriced. But broadly speaking, we price at the same levels as the market. So Safexpress obviously is rather than us, they are an excellent benchmark in this industry and a large, well-known and stable competitor. And so we typically will benchmark ourselves versus them or versus other players in the market.
If you look at it, our yield has also gone up over a period of time. In fact, I think our Q2 yield will be nearly INR 11 overall. And when we began this journey, our PTL yields were closer to the INR 10 sort of benchmark. So over a period of time, our commercial discipline has improved, over a period of time, the quality of our service has allowed us to go to clients and essentially have a slightly higher premium price compared to the other players, especially the unorganized players who they work with. But the interesting thing is when I was talking about the 15%, 16% service EBITDA margins that we think PTL can make, that does not include yield improvements. So if we were to improve yields going forward, and we will continue to do it tactically. That will be in addition to the 15%, 16% that I've already forecast.
We'll take the next question from Sachin Dixit.
My first question is with regards to the plans for third-party quick commerce services. I remember a couple of quarters back, you did highlight that you will be opening shared warehouses for people to ship quickly. Is this on top of it? Can you elaborate a bit more on this plan?
Yes, so the plan is very simple. We are going to open these third-party warehouses. This will be powered by Delhivery Warehouse Management System, which we use already in our fulfillment centers that we run for e-commerce and B2B. And this will be linked directly to our transportation network. Our WMS has already synced with our transportation network. So these will be smaller in-city warehouses. Typically, we expand the sizes of these warehouses to be somewhere between about 2,500 square feet at the smallest end to about 5,000 square feet at the upper end. Broadly speaking, this will begin with the probably about a 6 to 7 city operation. We are beginning with the city of Bengaluru because that's obviously sort of the Mecca of quick commerce in some senses.
And then we launch obviously NCR region as well but even within NCR selectively. The idea is very simple. If you're an e-commerce company that wants to sort of provide a rapid commerce service to your customers, essentially Delhivery's WMS is giving you, first of all, real-time visibility of your inventory and its location, which allows you to sort of display this on your website pointing out which SKUs are available for a rapid commerce or a quick commerce delivery option in real time. Consumers can obviously then choose to buy this on your website. And then we will facilitate the delivery. Our anticipation given the RDI that we have currently planned, is that even with reasonable order aggregation, which will allow us to keep the cost of delivery fairly low, we should be able to deliver all of these orders within sort of at the fastest and probably about an hour and at the slowest end of plan will be to deliver within 4 hours, which I think moves the requirements of all of our clients.
And the deal is that you share this inventory. I don't think any e-commerce company in India has sort of the order density or even the necessity really to go and set up a fully cellphone quick commerce network. It doesn't make sense. Also, this is a very dynamic space. So selecting which SKUs, the quantities of the SKUs to place in a variety of locations, managing that versus -- your B2B versus your traditional e-commerce operations, et cetera, it's fairly complicated. So the idea is that we go to absolutely everybody and say, look, you can share this in city infrastructure.
It's not -- let me be honest, it's not vastly different from what we do in any case with our e-commerce fulfillment services. We have a number of e-commerce companies for whom we provide essentially a white label Amazon Prime kind of service where effectively, they can store inventory with us in deep resource fulfillment centers. And then from there, we do local and national delivery for them. This is just a scaled-down version of that a city level.
My second question is on the line of basically what we saw in terms of service EBITDA margin dip in quick commerce -- sorry, in Express Parcel. My question largely is basically, we have been obviously investing into automation, into building capacity across the board since last -- I mean since inception, but largely over the last 4 quarters, we have expanded capacity. But if you look at H1, our volume growth are only 1-odd percent. Is it the reason for this, there could be a lack of capacity utilization or basically deutilizaiton?
No. And I think if you look at it, the incremental sort of investments that we have made from a capacity standpoint have been indexed more to the growth of the PTL business and to some extent, the growth of our volumes in heavies. Actually speaking, the incremental investments on the parcel side have been very small because the reality is we already have these mega gateways and our sortation centers have been there. So we've been able to sort of not have to invest huge amounts of capital in retooling or expanding the parcel network. But we are, at this point, supporting already 27% revenue growth year-on-year in the PTL business and we have seen significant growth in the heavy business also year-on-year, which is where we need to make these capacity investments. And that's sort of where the investment has gone not so much on the parcel side.
On the parcel side, the change in margin between Q1 and Q2, as I mentioned, one is obviously because of the fact that the peak season this time is closer to the end of Q2, in fact the peak season began on September 26, which means we had to start taking up capacities a little earlier, right? And this is anyway typically the season in which not just Delhivery but every 3PL and even the captives typically will invest and bring a reasonable amount of capacity online. So some amount of dip from Q1 to Q2 is anticipated. It is expected. In this case, the delta Q2-on-Q2 year-on-year is largely because of the fact that the peak this time is closer to -- it has started in September.
But structurally, I just want to reemphasize, there is no change in the structural expected margins of the Express business. We make -- last year, we made between, I think, at the lowest end 16% and on the other higher end 20.6% service EBITDA, we don't think that structurally those margins will change in this year. For the first 2 quarters, they already happen. Q3, we have reasonable line of sight in any case.
So we don't see any reason for that to structurally change and as like I mentioned we do this in a world where yields are already at -- blended yields at INR 70 and a parcel yields at they are. So despite an environment in which is price competitive, despite an environment which is changing for most 3PLs, Delhivery continues to make 17% service EBITDA margins on the Express business.
The reason why I asked that question, right, obviously, we have been highlighting since IPO that 50%, 60% incremental EBITDA -- incremental gross margins, we see your on transport business. This is probably the first quarter that we are seeing that not happening, right? If I look at Y-o-Y, our revenues have improved but our incremental gross margins looks much good. That's why I was asking the question.
Understood. Thank you.
We'll take the next question from Manjeet Buaria.
Sahil, I had 3 questions, all on Part Truckload business. First was, if you could just explain if our Part Truckload business is different in any way, fundamentally from what Gati or TCI or a Safex does, and where I'm coming from is I think these guys have a lot of branches in many cities. I'm not sure whether we operate on the same model. So just a basic question there.
Second question on PTL was how much of your PTL volume is mandated to be on an Express sort of mandate versus how much of our PTL volume is just normal PTL, where the customer doesn't really care about the time line to be expressed? And the final 1 was our PTL business, can you start giving service level data on on-time delivery cargo claim ratio? So just help us appreciate the point you have been making.
Got it. Understood. All sort of very good questions. On the PTL business, your first question is how are we different from most of the other players in this space? I think the business -- and there's no shame in admitting this, I think the business that we look up to the most in India as sort of an absolutely gold standard PTL business is Safexpress, right? And our first ambition as Delhivery is at the bare minimum to be able to do what Safexpress does. When you have a competitor, which is so high quality, why would you not want to do exactly what they do. And therefore, in that sense, if your question is are we different from Safexpress, fundamentally, yes, we have operational differences in terms of how we orchestrate the network. Our infrastructure may look different but we are both high-quality service providers to the PTL industry. We are both high-quality express service providers for the PTL industry. And we would certainly love to -- I mean who wouldn't want to build Safexpress?
But in terms of how we are different from the rest of the industry, my only simple answer would be we are -- Safexpress and Delhivery are high-quality players in this space. We are fundamentally different because we are invested in delivering a high-quality express experience to all of our customers. And I think that's just a fundamental philosophical difference. And therefore, a fundamental operational difference and the fundamental execution difference between us and everybody else in this space.
The branch models very widely, even among the players that you had mentioned actually. Our branch model, of course, is different from Safexpress as well, but also different from Gati, different from BRL and so on, right? Fundamentally, we operate fewer branches. As our total number of freight service stations is only 120 across the country. We utilize for everything that doesn't go through a freight service station, the advantage is that we are able to utilize our DC network, which we use for e-commerce. And so that allows us to have a significantly more expanded reach on a directly served network versus a franchise served network. And we are able to cross-utilize resources between our PTL and our Express networks. So that's sort of at a very high level, the difference.
And of course, there are a number of differences in terms of sort of how we orchestrate and route within the network, the overall interfaces, the fact that we're integrated with the heavy network but I won't get into that sort of today. Let me put it this way, to your question? Are we different from other players in this industry? Operationally, yes, from a technology standpoint, yes. Obviously, from a growth standpoint, it's quite visible. From a margin standpoint, I don't think over a period of time, we will be lagging the industry. We expect to be differentiated in a positive fashion with higher margins. We would love to be Safexpress as sort of the first ambition and then hopefully, everything going well outgrowing them. Rest of the industry, frankly, I don't think you can compare, these are apples and oranges.
On PTL volume, you said how many customers choose Express versus normal on a very light mode, I've never met a customer who wants the product slower. So all customers want their products to be treated as express products, really. And that's part of the reason why Delhivery has grown 27% a year, which is increasingly companies are coming to players like us and saying, we want inventory to reach its destination faster. It doesn't matter what you make. In what world would you want it to reach its destination slower. And especially if Delhivery and Safexpress for that matter, if you are able to deliver it for you at a faster speed and at a lower cost, which is broadly comparable to what you pay for slower delivery, why would you not want it?
The fact in India is very simple, which is it is possible to deliver higher quality of service at the same cost that low-quality players operate at. And that's really the market that Delhivery and not just Delhivery and Safexpress both clearly going after. And obviously, in our case, it's reflected in the numbers and the growth, which is 27%. And apart from that also in the fact that our yield has also gone up over this period.
So over a period of time, I don't think a market for poor quality, cheap logistics in India is going to remain at all. So all customers are going to say, we want express delivery effectively. And because the only way to deliver slower delivery is to drive your truck more slowly but it's not clear why you would do that.
The last piece is on service level data as well as on cargo claims. So I think fair point. We will look at whether we can actually provide cargo claim data. Overall, what I can tell you is that claim ratios for us have reduced consistently. We had peaked in terms of claim ratios during the spot on integration, which was a long time back, 2 years back, we continue to see quarter-on-quarter improvements in overall trends. We'll see if we can start publishing that data.
In terms of service levels, while I'm always very happy to provide service levels, our on-time delivery performance on freight typically tends to be in the sort of 89% to 93% sort of range on Delhivery's defined speeds. So I do want to be clear that Delhivery's defined speeds are often across the industry faster than the defined speeds that other players provide between 2 points. And so in some senses, even if we were to provide the data, it wouldn't be exactly comparable. On our internal expectations that we provide to clients, we typically are in the 89% to 93% sort of range. There's a significant variation, of course, that happens week on week because typically in the LTL industry volumes are highest in the fourth week or the last week of the month. And so service levels tend to dip right at the end of the last week and at the start of the first week. But otherwise, we remain broadly in this range.
Sir, just 1 follow-up question was when you say you and Safex do -- Safexpress high-quality experience for the customers, what are the quantitative KPIs you track for that?
Well, one you've already referred to why -- I mean, I refer to both really. One is obviously, delivery speed and the other is defects or claims, effectively delivering on time and in full.
So you have covered them both, right?
And the other one, of course, that I sort of tangentially referred to, but is important for customers is reach. See a lot of PTL networks, the reality is that their core reach of their network on the self-managed network is fairly small. The core reach will typically be 3,000 pin codes, 4,000 pin codes, 5,000 pin codes and everything else will be classified as what is in the industry parlance called ODA, which is an out-of-delivery area sort of delivery and then you charge premium for it. Whereas in Delhivery's case, because we have the DC network, practically, all of the 18,775 pin codes that we serve for Express, are a direct or non-ODA network. So customers look at reach as well. So reach, speed and quality.
We'll take the next question from Vinit Manek.
Just 2 questions from my side. One is on the Express Parcel segment. So the way we look at the industry currently, especially from the captive perspective with the 90-10 ratio versus the in-sourcing and the outsourcing. So over the next 2 years, do you feel that this ratio can materially start changing because of the cost per parcel to them versus us especially on the e-commerce parcel side or they have built their capacity and they would not like to change this or in-sourcing versus outsourcing ratio.
And largely, my second question is on the last mile side of the delivery. So just like the models of the quick commerce evolving very fast for many of the players do you think that this can be 1 of the challenges in terms of the availability of the labor or maybe the cost per parcel of the labor going forward over the next few quarters or maybe in the next 1 or 2 years?
Yes. Let me start with the second, obviously. There's no question that the labor market in India is challenging. There's no question that the labor market in India has tightened over the last couple of years. It's become harder to find people to deliver not just e-commerce packages, but pretty much anything. And obviously, road conditions being what they are, weather conditions being more variable. This is a job that over a period of time has become more difficult. I think from our standpoint, we have long sort of taken this view. We do not treat the workers who work with us as gig workers. We pay more than a fair wage, which is indexed very clearly to the cost of living in every city that we operate in.
And our aim is to make sure that we have a certain minimum base of full-time employees as well who deliver on our behalf. It's the best way to make sure that you have a sort of steady, reliable capacity at all times. So despite labor conditions being challenging, you can see that overall, our economics are quite favorable. I do anticipate though that the labor situation will continue to sort of remain challenging. The good thing for us, as I mentioned, is that whether there's a regulatory change on sort of gig worker rights, et cetera, those things are going to have very limited impact on Delhivery, if any at all, because we're already sort of ahead of the curve on this.
In terms of the captive ratio, it's hard for me to comment on whether they will change the 90-10 ratio to anything because, one, obviously, I can't comment on what somebody else's sort of strategy is or should be. But what I can tell you is that, look, like I mentioned, the financial results are out for 1 of them, the burn is whatever significantly higher than it was in the previous financial year. Now it's hard for me to say anything. At the end of the day, if a company is not going to be financially motivated, it's hard to sort of describe exactly what its future path is going to be. All I can tell you overall is that hopefully, things -- I don't think things will get much worse in the 90-10 as far as third-party logistics is concerned because I think you do need to have a strong partner given variabilities in your own network. It's inevitable.
At any point in time, your network would be affected by weather. It could be affected by local issues. It could be just a pure sort of operational mismanagement issue and therefore, having a strong partner who can work with you on a reliable basis is important. And I think no matter what their individual strategies, all of the players with captive logistics have realized that Delhivery is their partner. And reward us for our high-quality service and also for the benefits we have in terms of pricing. My view, of course, personally, is that the right ratio is not 90-10 but significantly different.
I think everybody in the industry, especially the 2 biggest marketplaces save, very, very large amounts of money by outsourcing, even relatively speaking, smaller number of -- even if you go from 90-10 to even 80-20, I think the reality is that both of the large marketplaces in India will save very, very significant amount of money that is ultimately in the best interest of both of the shareholders. But until such time as they're not completely financially motivated, I don't know whether things will change or not.
I think it's a good idea. It saves everybody money. It makes the entire Indian logistics ecosystem significantly more efficient. We are the lowest cost player. We are the highest quality player in this case. And I think at some point sense will prevail. What point that is, it's hard for me to predict. And at that point, I think we'll do very well.
Got it. And for the heavy goods, as we have highlighted that we have a significant sharing with the top 2 e-commerce players. So is the ratio very different, especially in terms of the heavy goods supply or even that stays the same like a 90-10 kind of a ratio for the largest 2 e-commerce company?
No, it's very different, actually. It's not the same 90-10 ratio that is there. My sense is that if you -- this you have to break up actually by subcategory also because it varies a lot. Everything -- heavy, for example, is everything that weighs over 5 kgs. Now something that was 5 kg as an example, the ratio of outsourcing instead of 90-10, maybe something like 80-20. But by the time you're getting to the really heavy stuff, it's bicycles, gym kits, ladders, mattresses, home appliances like refrigerators or washing machines and so on, that ratio would be vastly different there, and it's also very geography specific. The ratio, for example, in the metros for some of these heavier categories, maybe, let's say, 60-40, 70-30. But by the time you're getting out of the metros, those ratios maybe where actually the third-party player, which is us in this case, will actually have higher share than the in-house logistics are. And that's where the PTL network -- the integration of the PTL and the heavy network makes a very, very big difference. Overall, the only player has the ability to offer that service reliably pan-India.
We'll take the next question from Anshul Agrawal.
Sahil, my question is with regards to the explanation that you gave for the third-party service that we'll be providing that we are currently in the pilot mode, do you think that structurally, the distance traveled for a parcel on our network will sort of reduce given the fact that our customers would want their customers to get everything quicker?
Are you asking about the entire delivery network aggregated?
Yes, generally, e-commerce guy is also wanting to get their products delivered quicker. Would supply chain sort of build out a structure -- built out a network in such a kind that the transport aspect of the whole parcel ecosystem reduces, the kilometers that a parcel travel reduces?
That is a hugely complicated question. Let me do my best to try to answer this as simply as I can. It really depends -- you'll have to again break this into subsegments of users. Certainly, what will happen as an example for the biggest metro cities is that there will be an overall reduction in distance. There's no question because in city warehouses will reduce the distance traveled by packages for a small fraction of them compared to delivering from a distant fulfillment center. So if I take the city of Bhiwandi, as an example, instead of delivering from Bhiwandi to somebody who lives, let's say, in Mahim, you may actually deliver it from a smaller warehouse, which is, I don't know, let's say, it's in Khar or in Andheri or somewhere. So obviously, that change will happen.
With that said, I do want you to bear in mind that supply and demand both have to be influenced for distance to reduce. If you want to buy a Saree, which is made by a guy in Surat, and you happen to live in Agartala, quick commerce is not going to reduce the distance that, that parcel has to travel.
The second thing also is that you have to look at where incremental consumer growth is going to happen. The reality is that the larger cities in India already are sort of fairly penetrated from a consumer standpoint, right? The reality is that if Indian e-commerce is to accelerate its growth, e-commerce has to penetrate far beyond the top 8 or 10 cities, you have to be sort of in the next 1,000 cities. And as consumer growth in all of those cities goes up, the only way to really reduce distance traveled per shipment is to actually go back to the classic e-commerce model of forward fulfillment with deep reserve warehouses, which is something the Delhivery already offer.
So if you're an e-commerce company as an example today, you can warehouse with us on a variable cost basis in 4 different regions instead of actually servicing everything out of, let's say, a Delhi or a Bombay or a Bengaluru. And that's how you reduce distance.
So I don't think structurally quick commerce on its own is vastly going to reduce the distance traveled by a package, for some categories in some cities, it might, but the real reduction in distance will come as demand in Tier 1, Tier 2, Tier 3 cities, semi-urban, even parts of rural starts increasing. And as the fulfillment network goes forward into all of these locations.
Clear sir. Just a follow-up on this. So if demand for e-commerce becomes more democratized maybe because of quick commerce or just generally otherwise, distance traveled for a parcel might reduce on our network. Would that be a correct conclusion?
Overall, over the long arc of time, distance traveled for parcel will reduce anyway.
We'll take the next question from Shrinidhi Karlekar.
Can you hear me?
Yes. Please go ahead.
Yes. So Sahil, you alluded to 4 or 5 very company-specific initiatives to drive up growth, particularly with the aim of gaining some shares. Would it be possible to elaborate a couple of them, which will you think are material and can have a higher impact on the growth? And also exactly what services you're offering? And what are opportunities out there?
So fundamentally, these are, like I said, a couple of things. One is we will be expanding our regional surface NDD product with better cutoffs, which means, let's say, you want to deliver out of Delhi and you want to deliver to, let's say, Hisar you want to deliver to someone just outside of Jaipur or so on. Today, we will be increasing the speed of that delivery operation. And the second is, so far, we have been a smaller participant overall pan-India on the air express segment. So we will, to a small degree, expand our air express product, right? We've largely been flying for instance, mainly on nonprime flights. We will also expand to also flying on prime flights because I think there's a certain amount of demand for certain categories where people want products between sort of, let's say, Delhi and Bombay next day, ordered in the evening, delivered in the day, and the next day and so on. So that's the product that we will launch. That's one.
The second, as I've already spoken about is the product that we are piloting in Bengaluru, which is the third-party intra-city rapid delivery product. The third, obviously, is the -- fundamentally the data products that sit on Delhivery One, which is a way for e-commerce companies, obviously, the ones which care about these metrics to reduce return rates, for example, or to disambiguate addresses and therefore, improve chances of delivery thereby preventing re-attempts. And the advantage is that these are services that Delhivery has built out for internal use. So we're really just externalizing them. And obviously, on the freight side as well as on the parcel side launching what is effectively a secure product or I think of it as an insurance product.
And the fourth, as I mentioned, is really expanding deliveries off-line reach as well, which is really expanding the delivery franchise program. So far, our approach has always been really that e-commerce companies discover us and will ship by Delhivery One and so on. And we have an online product, but we've discovered that there are very large numbers of small businesses across the country who don't necessarily want to interact with the logistics company via this form of an interface. While we do have the Delhivery Direct app and there are many ways for them to approach Delhivery, some of them really want to have the neighborhood store, which has the ability to route into the country's largest courier, which is us.
And so we will open up this program as well. So hopefully, you'll start seeing Delhivery around your neighborhood a lot more than you have so far. And we're pretty high hopes that, that will enable SMEs and even individual consumers to a large extent to route their shipping needs and even some of the freight needs into the delivery network.
Right. And also, you said something on the 3PL side as well, right, passing on some efficiencies, what you're exactly referring there?
3PL side. Apologies I...
Yes. So one of the initiatives you highlighted in earlier comments was like some of the efficiency that you are gaining, you aim to pass on to some of your customers for a higher growth?
No, no, sorry. I meant that in the PTL business, I mean, after in the PTL business, first of all, even without doing any of these things, we anticipate that the margins in the PTL business will continue to improve, and we'll eventually get to sort of the margins that we have in the Express business. But the advantage that we have is because we use more efficient form factors of delivery and because of the automation that we have in our key hubs, over a period of time at that stage, we anticipate that we should have a lower cost structure than other players in this industry. And if we discover those advantages, then some of those benefits, we will have the ability to pass on back to our customers in the PTL space.
Understood. Sahil, last question, if I may. So you do talk about some of the inefficiencies having own captive network for e-commerce companies. But are you seeing in some of the cases where the realization, like, for example, in heavy, are these guys realizing that maybe it's best to be outsourced on a selective product categories or route basis? Is that kind of realization coming through? Or they're still looking at overall picture only?
No, it is starting to come through. And by the way, that's -- it's an interesting question that you ask. It is not just in heavy and not just in specific categories in heavy. So we are having this conversation not just with obviously the 2 large marketplaces. But in general, even players who've historically relied on other sort of unorganized third-party players to do the heavy category. We're discovering with these categories they want to outsource to us entirely. One good example, for example, is furniture, where we have a disproportionate share. Overall of the amount of furniture delivery across the country.
The other interesting 1 is a lot of bicycles were bought in this period, mattresses. So the heavy form of foam, again, is something that comes to us a lot. And interestingly, once we enter this category, the interesting thing is that we not only have the ability to sort of provide huge efficiency and service to the marketplaces but even to existing offline players in this space, which is where it starts becoming interesting. We'll be certainly sort of the logistics partner of choice, and we can go and have an unreasonable right to win with all mattress companies in India because the service that we provide.
So yes, we are seeing that this sense is running. And I think over a period of time for the captives to really realize cost benefits, this is the approach that we think they will take and they should take, which is to slowly identify which categories really do not fit within the captive network properly and to start outsourcing those sort of end mass to delivery and to other players perhaps.
And the last one, Sahil....
Shrinidhi, sorry to interrupt. We'll take the last question now. You can take any further questions with the Investor Relations team.
We'll take the last question from Abhisek Banerjee.
Sahil, just one question. With regards to, say, the rapid logistics intra-city, intra-city logistics that you spoke about but there is a competitor which kind of claims that it was -- the network was built to handle that kind of a business, right? So what do you see as your right to win in that space?
So I'm not sure I understand. You are saying that somebody has told you that their network is purpose-built to deliver for our delivery?
No. As in, they started off with quicker deliveries, yes, one of your competitors.
What does that mean? We've always done same day delivery. If you have a delivery station in Dwarka and you have a customer in Dwarka, today, even delivery will likely deliver that order in 15 minutes. I think that claim is bogus. There's absolutely no sort of difference. There's no specific sort of network design that acquired to make sure that you can do a more rapid delivery. It's an absolutely outlandish claim.
Okay. Fair enough.
Delhivery's right to win to be very clear is that we are the largest logistics company in the country. We have delivery stations, which are within 2.5 kilometers of every consumer in every sort of urban area in the country and we have 50,000 bikers. So it's not a question of specific network. I think this is -- yes, this is no way.
Okay. Fair enough. Also, to Amit, sir, what -- why have you taken the reversal into the other expenses and not as an exceptional item?
Because it was charged to the other expenses when we made the provision. That is where we have reversed cost.
Got it. And the working capital reduction that we have seen in this quarter is that something you believe will continue the 22 days odd, which we are seeing now? Or do you expect it to revert back to a higher level?
So I think exactly about a year ago, I had indicated that we will be able to reduce the working capital day by 1 to 2 days every year for next 2, 3 years. And we have been able to achieve that. The difference that you see in March that it increased just due to seasonally high quarter end for 1 of our consumer available client, where we have to -- we end up inbounding a lot of stuff and outbounding as well. So there is a very large revenue buildup that happens within the 15 days of March because of which the receivables increase and payables decreased because FTL placements are done -- as prepaid. So that's the primary reason.
We expect to see this number to continue to improve by a day or so, day 2 days every year. In both Express and PTL, we are very close to our steady state working capital. There is room to improve but in other businesses, Supply Chain Services, FTL and cross-border, there is room to improve for us, which should result into 1 to 2 days improvement per year.
Understood, sir. And just 1 final question to, Sahil, again. So during the earlier part of the call, you kind of mentioned that most probably most of the disruption with regards to in-sourcing is behind us. In that case, is it fair to assume that your earlier guidance of 15% to 20% kind of revenue growth in Express Parcel can be achieved from H2 onwards? Or would you rather not get to back to that?
No, I think, look, it's hard to comment because it will also depend on what happens to the market or et cetera. So I don't really know. And while certainly, I think that the bulk of the in-sourcing sort of problem is behind us, and it, people make jerky moves. I don't think that it makes sense. I don't think it will happen. I think there's a nice equilibrium that we have all reached. So let's see. I'll have more information every quarter as we do these calls.
Thank you, everyone. That was the last question. Before we end on behalf of Macquarie, I would like to thank Delhivery for the opportunity to host this earnings call. Over to you, Sahil, for any closing remarks.
Thank you, Baidu. Thank you, Cheryl. Thank you to Macquarie for hosting us this evening, and thank you all for joining the call.