Central Depository Services (India) Ltd
NSE:CDSL
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
827.767
1 600.95
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches INR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the Central Depository Services (India) Limited Q3 FY '23 Investor Call, hosted by Axis Capital Limited. Please note that CDSL does not provide specific revenue or earnings guidance.
Anything said on this call, which reflects CDSL's outlook for the future or which could be construed as forward-looking statements must be reviewed in conjunction with the risk that the company faces.
[Operator Instructions] Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Praveen Agarwal from Axis Capital Limited. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
Thank you, Darwin. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the earnings call of CDSL Limited. We have with us Mr. Nehal Vora, MD and CEO along with his other team members to be answering your questions. I would request Mr. Nehal to share his initial highlights for the results, post which we'll open the floor for Q&A. Over to you, sir.
Thank you so much. A very good afternoon, and welcome, everyone. I hope each of you and your loved ones are safe and healthy.
Thank you for joining us today to discuss CDSL's financial results for the third quarter of the financial year '22-'23. As in previous quarters, we have posted a detailed financial presentation on our website for your reference. I'm joined by the CDSL Group's leadership team.
This quarter, India further strengthened it's retail participation in Indian capital markets, has registered investors that available with the stock exchanges stands at 12 crores-plus. The total number of demat accounts, investors with CDSL as on 31st December, '22 reached 7.78 crore demat accounts. The same number as on December 31, '21, was 5.56 crores, an increase of about 40%.
The new milestones that India has achieved are due to a combination of 2 factors: growth of the digital online movement and the empowerment of investors, the convenience and ease of doing business; digital services, such as online account openings, eDIS, Margin Pledge and Repledge mechanism, eAGM and e-Voting, et cetera, in the hands of the investor in various corners of the country has started it into the growth story for the Indian retail investors.
Having said that, we believe that this is just the beginning. Our primary focus remains on the continuous improvement of the financial ecosystem by making it more efficient and transparent.
Speaking further on our performance, CDSL has been following its strategy to keep the business growing on a sustainable foundation with a diversified revenue while investing in advanced technology and its people. For the quarter, a number of active accounts admitted with CDSL as on December 31, '22, stood at 19,724, an increase of 12% from the number of active companies as on December 31, 2021.
Furthermore, the value of securities in demat custody with CDSL stood at INR 41 lakh crores as on 31 December '22, an increase of about 11% from the value of securities held as of the previous year.
Our ability to understand the requirements, innovate and build on technologies and to deliver diversified experience, this continues to drive strong value for our stakeholders and investors.
Before I hand it over to our CFO, Shri Girish Amesara, I would just like to say the growth of Indian securities market is an extremely encouraging sign of India's potential.
I also want to place an appreciation and gratitude to all our stakeholders, regulators, depository participants, investors, issuers and other market participants and employees for their constant faith in us.
So I would now hand it over to our CFO, Shri Girish Amesara.
Thank you, Nehal. Good afternoon to everyone. On an year-on-year performance, the consolidated total income for the December '22 quarter is at INR 160.87 crore compared to INR 162.93 crore for the December '21 quarter. The net profit on a consolidated basis for December '22 quarter is achieved at INR 74.737 crore as against INR 83.63 crores for the December '21 quarter.
The total income on a stand-alone basis on a year-on-year basis for December '22 quarter is at INR 132.94 crore as against INR 121.55 crore for the December '21 quarter. The net profit on a stand-alone basis on an year-on-year basis is at INR 62.71 crore as against INR 63.77 crore for the December '21 quarter.
Now I shall request Sunil Alvares to give an update about the operation of fully owned subsidiary, CDSL Ventures Limited. Thank you. Over to you, Sunil.
Yes, good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the CDSL earnings call. I would like to present the results of CDSL for the quarter ended December 31, 2022. On the quarter ended December '22, the operational income was INR 23.07 crore as compared to INR 25.82 crores for the quarter ended September '22, which was a drop of about 10%. The other income was at INR 4.05 crore as against INR 2.89 crores, which was a jump of 40%. The total income was at INR 27.13 crore as against INR 28.71 crores, which was a slight drop of 5%.
Total income -- total expenses dropped by 3% from INR 10.92 crores to INR 10.54 crores during this quarter. The profit before tax was INR 16.58 crores as against INR 17.78 crores, and the profit after tax was INR 12.59 crores as against INR 13.44 crores.
During this period, we saw a slight dip in the KYC creation from 26 point -- sorry, 27.91 lakh to 26.86 lakhs. The KYC Fetch was at 58.76 lakhs from 65.06 lakhs.
So I'd like to pass on -- I'd like to open the call for any questions that you all have. Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Prakash Kapadia from Anived Portfolio Managers Private Limited.
Two or 3 questions from my end. If I look at the subsidiary, the CKYC business, it's I think the third quarter in a row where the revenues have degrown for us. So if you could give us some sense what is impacting revenues? Because revenues are not so large, but still we are degrowing. That's the first question.
Second question is, what kind of CapEx we've done for the current year? And what is the likely CapEx for next year?
And lastly, out of the total demat account, if you could give us some sense of what are the unique or active demand accounts because we've grown rapidly in the last 2, 2.5 years. So if you could give us some color on that? Those are my 3 questions.
Yes. So I'll first answer your third question, and I'll refer your second question to the CFO, Girish, and the first question to Sunil. On the first and third question, I think CVLs is a measure of the total volumes in the market. And there has been some muted volumes over the last few months due to the -- basically the geopolitical issues, the war-like situations, et cetera. And the market, basically the interest rates firming up, et cetera.
In terms of -- we don't give out the numbers from a privacy point of view as to how much is active, inactive. It's kind of given -- what has been given out is basically the total number of in demat accounts.
But it shows that whatever is our maybe transaction-based income has also kind of been in the -- about the same levels over the last 3, 4 months. So that kind of gives you a kind of an indication of what has been basically the market participation.
I'll hand it over to Girish to answer the CapEx question.
So till December, we have incurred a capital expenditure of roughly INR 17 crore. And this is in line with our overall budgetary approvals that we do every year. About future, I will not be able to make any comments about the future because we don't do any forecasting. I will hand it over to Sunil to answer your next question.
Yes. As Nehal has just pointed out that the -- for the 9-month period December 31, 2022, the markets have been very muted. So if you do the -- number of KYC records, which are fetched, operated are intrinsic building to the number of demat and broking accounts which are vacant. So with a drop in the demat and broking accounts, so okay, it has also impacted the KYC records. So I hope that answers your question.
The next question is from the line of [ Homeyar ] from Kotak Mahindra.
I have just one question for you. What is the number of delivered -- deliverable trades, is that fit with on the CDSL accounts? Number, because that is what affects our revenue. So the number of accounts is inconsequences, what is the number of deliverable trades on a weekly or a monthly basis?
You should look at the exchange website on the delivery...
No, exchange gives the volumes. And volume is not total volumes for share -- for each share it gives volumes. It doesn't give the total number of trades that takes places. Total volume is also do not says. As you said, that you charge a particular fee of each trade, it is for sure the volume of the trade. So if that can sell 1 crore shares also, but the deliver that takes places on 1 delivery, you only charge -- will be charged only one-time fees.
Yes. So we don't give that information out. So that...
But why is it -- what is so private about number? I'm not asking per person. I'm not asking per person. I'm asking the total number of trades that take place. There's nothing private about it. What is -- who is going to inform okay. I'm asking for total number of trades that takes places. I'm not asking for individual or this person or this share or that share. Total number of trades that take place.
We have taken your point on record. There are certain regulatory frameworks, which we are working for many years. So we will kind of assess it and examine. Whatever is possible, we can put it out.
Sir, you can at least share this with the shareholders. This is nothing to do with privacy, it's just total number of trades that take place.
Total number of trades are never been put out for so many years. But anyways...
But why? I don't get that. I don't look at -- that is what appears for revenue.
You are just presently repeating your questions. I told you that we will -- we have taken the question down. You can send us an e-mail, and we will send your reply also on that.
Okay. Can you confirm the e-mail address, please.
It is there on our website. You can take it from there.
The next question is from the line of Prayesh Jain from Motilal Oswal.
Sir, the question is more on the industry outlook and not specific to CDSL. So if you look at the kind of measures the regulator has implemented. Once, not the -- this is not the regulation, but then it showcase that -- is only 10% of the active traders and F&O actually make profits.
And by line of this does not impact your business, but that it does impact the sentiments on the street and that will eventually will lead to an impact on the number of demat accounts that get opened. Apart from that, other regulations that have come through, do you think that the pace of demat account addition is kind of -- it has slowed down, obviously, in the last say 3 to 4 quarters. Do you see any pickup that can happen or what could trigger the pickup of demat accounts again?
So I think it's a good question, Prayesh. I think what the SEBI study from an industry outlook is kind of showcasing is that investors should be aware about its suitability norms and our objectives before kind of really attempting in complex products like futures and options.
Now this business is a business of faith and trust. So I think -- and it is a long-term play, which is more importantly, which creates wealth typically. So I think the important thing is that as a market infrastructure institution our intent and our focus has been and will continue to be to ensure more and more transparency from an investor point of view.
He or she should be able to do it himself or herself. So that brings in the trust factor. Also, it brings in basically the responsibility in terms of how one trades because it is your own wealth, which is your creating.
And that's where I see the key driver is that when there is a clear focus on ensuring transparency as well as basically allowing people to really understand -- more and more people will be able to participate in the securities market.
Today, we're at about 6% to 7% of the population. We have an Indian -- we have a population which is very young. And hence, it is really being important that we continue to embark in this reform journey of ensuring more and more transparency in the way we conduct ourselves.
And then that you leave it, more and more people are going to be joining into the fold, which is hope and it is not a short-term play or a quarter-on-quarter play which we look at. It's more of a long-term foundation which we are looking at. So that's how I would really basically approach this question.
Okay. And the other one is we heard ASBA thing, what has been spoken about and that ASBA kind of thing to be implemented for the secondary markets. Now that kind of takes away -- how well with the float income of brokers. But does that really increase the compliances from your end? Or what is the kind of impact that CDSL will have to go through in case that is implemented?
So that is not really majorly applicable from a depository point of view. It's more on the clearing corporation point of view of funds. So anyway, securities, there is kind of reform, which has already been put in place where the -- if the investors' shares are blocked and only once the obligation translates into a public, translates into a transfer, which happens. So I think that's the general move in which we are moving towards. And hence, this is something which is -- may not be really applicable to CDSL, has weekly deposit funds.
Okay. Okay. And last question, Nehal, could you talk about what are the new avenues of revenue that you are looking at to garner, say, in the next 3 to 5 years? I know not forward-looking -- you don't give forward-looking statements. But from a strategy perspective, if you could give us some thoughts as to what are the aspects that you're looking at, that would be helpful.
So I think CDSL has a generic, without giving into any forward-looking statements and I'm very conscious about that principle. Is that we'll continue to embark upon our journey of making it on technology, where we would like to focus more and more into technology and a more of B2C kind of information flow where more and more investors are able to observe, see their demat accounts, operate their demat account themselves, that's the entire ethos with which we are working.
And as more and more kind of with the -- basically asset classes are going to come into play, there is going to be more and more people who are joining into it. And that is where our focus is going to continue to remain. Because that is what is basically the society would want that kind of ease of doing business, the transparency factor and the security factor. These are some of the key aspects in which we will be working.
Okay. So sir, I'll just slip in one more. Any thoughts on the insurance repository business as to how that's shaped up? And what is the status from IDA on this?
So I think it's going through its own process of basically the implementation. It's a big reform. And all the insurance companies are kind of gearing up towards that. So...
Any data that you can share as to what is the size that has happened? Currently, how many accounts are there in the industry? And what is the kind of number of policies that are covered in the EI so far?
So as of now, there are no specific numbers to put out on basically the public domain. It is going through the process of the reforms in terms of this entire move, which is kind of in happening. But maybe Ramkumar, you want to add to anything to this?
No, sir, you have covered it. And only in the annual report we'll give the yearly figures as is required. But otherwise, generally, we don't put it in the project public domain, as far as mentioned.
Yes. Thank you.
The next question is from the line of Amit Chandra from HDFC Securities.
Yes. Sir, my first question is on the ransomware attacks that you had. So can you please provide some more update on what actually went wrong there? And also, like more from a technology perspective, so what kind of investments are required in terms of our technology structure. So is it total revamp is required or are you going to expand it in all your team? So that is the first question.
And second is in terms of the investment in the office space that we have done around CapEx of INR 163 crores, 46,000 square feet. So it's like massive investment at least 2.5x like bigger than the last office space we bought. So what is the reason behind buying such a large office space? And also in terms of the impact in the other stream that we had because of a drop in e-voting. So if you can quantify what is the exact drop in e-voting that we had prior to last quarter?
So on the first question on malware, and we've put out a detailed press release, it was a CDSL securities operation system, which was from the first major expenses which CDSL has embarked upon in the new management team. We have the state-of-art. So it itself basically detected this.
And we see that this is the trend in one of the large companies also, be it the global companies also face these kind of safety outages. The important thing is how far you're able to really restore your operations. And CDSL was very quick in ensuring basically the restoration. The regulatory requirements on filing of reports, et cetera, will continue to happen as and when we are supposed to do it, and that's outside basically the public domain.
But the important thing is that CDSL has able to basically restore its entire operations. In terms of after this episode has taken place. We continue to embark upon. There is no revamp required. I think the system was surface ticketed enough to be detected. And we will continue to -- it's kind of a science and an art security. So we continue to ensure that the top class consultants and the people are part of our [Technical Difficulty]
Hello? Hello, operator?
Yes. Sir, the music is from the line of the management. I have -- should I redial the number, sir?
Hello?
Yes, sir. Please go ahead, sir.
Yes. So Amit, are you online?
Yes, yes, yes. I'm there, sir. Yes.
Yes. So that's what I'm saying that we will continue to embark upon the sophistication of our existing framework to come in line with what are the best international practices, cutting edge in terms of ensuring and that is going to be our focus.
Your second question on the property. The intent is we are embarking upon our sophistication of technology and people, but these are the 2 key aspects. These are some of the -- it has gone through a rigorous kind of processing at basically the Board level to assess what will be the requirements, both from a regulatory side, because the regulatory responsibilities are also increasing, the technology response also increasing, the subsidiaries are growing.
And the important thing is to have a 1 CDSL as a focus where all subsidiaries are working within the same building. So that there is a kind of an integration which is continuing to really embark upon.
And the third question, I'll ask the CFO, Girish, to answer that question.
So if you look at our historical data, traditionally e-voting business has been on maximum in the second quarter. So second quarter, we had clocked income of INR 14.18 crore. However, in this quarter also, we have achieved an income of INR 3.78 crore. I hope this answers your question.
The next question is from the line of Madhukar Ladha from Nuvama.
Hello? Am I audible?
Yes, please.
I wanted to get a sense of what were the KRA records at the end of the period and how many got created and what were the fetches? You used to give this number on calls. So it will be good to sort of get this detail right now.
I don't think we used to give these numbers as from my recollection. And I have confirmed that with my CFO also. Sunil, also, I don't think I can confirm, I don't think we used to give these.
No. You used to say it on the call, sir to questions. I guess, Sunil used to give these numbers. I have the previous year's numbers with me.
Okay. Sunil? I'll just ask Sunil to respond to this.
Yes. So for the 9 months period...
No. Do we give these numbers out, Sunil? That is the question, first.
It's not there in the public domain.
Yes. So do we give these numbers, that's what is the...
No, on the previous call, we had given.
Then we should put it out if you are giving it on the call, going forward, we should put out these numbers then.
Sure.
Yes. You can go ahead...
Can I have it for the quarter end?
Yes, for the 9 months FY '23, we did 85.72 lakhs records as against 1.11 crore last year. And from the fetch side, we did 1.9 crore as against 2.51 crores last year. So on both cases, it was a dip of about 23% to 24%.
Understood. And because of -- I understand the KYC business, let me -- if I recollect correctly, we make around INR 20 per record creation and about INR 35 per fetch. Has there been any change in the economics? That's part one of the question.
Part 2 was also the adoption of Aadhaar-based KYC could actually impact these revenues. So any comments around that will be helpful in terms of where the competing technology is and whether that will be used in financial services?
Two things. One is the Aadhaar-based technology is already being used by most intermediaries. And after the KYC is fetched from Aadhaar, okay, the record is then uploaded in the KRA. So in a way, it is actually facilitates the online journey of customers and has increased the number of KYC records in the KRA. I didn't get your first question, sorry.
So I understand in that Aadhaar-based technology, the realizations could be lower from the current realization. Has that changed?
This will be a more futuristic question. So I would recommend that let's kind of remain because we don't give a future outlook. It will have to be seen how it will pan out as we move forward. But what we're able to kind of focus on is what is happening as on today.
Understood. And currently, we are still realizing INR 20 per record created and is about INR 35 for fetches, is that understanding correct?
See, that understanding is correct so far as our rack rates are concerned, but there are certain discounts.
The next question is from the line of Sanketh Godha from Spark Capital.
So I have 2 questions and a couple of data-keeping points. So first one is on insurance repository. I just wanted to understand or if you can give a color whether we have already started in intense discussions with the insurance companies?
And what charges we are requiring -- we are charging and whether entire industry is thinking to outsource this to the depository or they intend to do it in-house? And where the charges will settle? So just if you can give a little bit of color, how it will play out in from next fiscal year? That's the first question on insurance repository.
And second question is with respect to this KYC itself. Yesterday in the budget or day before in the budget, Finance Ministry has spoken about DigiLocker or the public cost structure and KYC linkage. So just wanted to understand whether this will have any impact on the current CVL's KRA business or how it will compete with the KYC income?
So both questions, I think are more futuristic. Insurance, something which you'll have to wait and watch how will it play out on how they will be kind of putting it where that charges will basically stabilize, et cetera. The teams are going ahead with their normal process of reaching out to the insurance companies, and we'll have to wait and watch. As regards...
Sorry, but sir, on this one, just a small follow-up. Is there any pushback from insurance companies that they want to do it in-house or they are okay to outsource it to the repositories?
It's difficult to kind of gauge at this stage because they're all going through their own process of kind of really assessing the situation. But the regulations require it to have kind of an account. So I don't see that -- I think the rules are pretty clear as to how it needs to be done. So they'll have to follow that.
And sir, the reason I'm asking is that even the KYC thing has gone live from 1 April -- sorry, 1 Jan for the insurance -- every insurance product. So any color there because it has already gone live?
Yes, that is for the new -- and that also is going through a process of basically the evolution is for the new insurance companies -- the new insurance policies. So again, that's going through its own process of how it will basically stabilize because each one has its own way of ensuring its technology also is in compliance with all these requirements.
As regards to your second question on the KYC also. This will have to be just an announcement made. There is no formal process. And I think there are certain nuances and value adds, which the KRA as a process is involved in. And I think those are expected to continue. I don't think there is going to be any change, which is expected at this stage.
Got it, sir. And probably a few data-keeping questions. Sir, if you can let us know the pledge income, annualized income broken down into listed and unlisted and cash income? And then if you can provide data provision also, it will be great because I think we used to disclose all these numbers in the past?
So the income from unlisted company in the quarter is at INR 89 lakhs and for 9 months, it is at INR 3.66 crore. With respect to margin pledge, the income for this quarter is INR 3.27 crore. And third, you had said about what?
Cash income.
Cash is at INR 5 crore.
And finally, debtors provision?
Debtors provision is at INR 3 crore.
The next question is from Pranav Muchhala from Reliance General Insurance.
Yes. Sir, 2 quick questions. First, the question that I had is, sir, if you could give any guidance on the CapEx that we intend to do in terms of the technology cost for the forthcoming year?
Yes, Pranav, normally, we don't give any future outlook. So that we'll not able to give any specifics.
Okay. Sir, because we've talked quite a lot about the technology. So it will be much more helpful to understand or if you could give or the management could give a retrospective guidance or a ballpark's percentage of top line, which could be earmarked towards the technology costs in terms of an investment?
So we will not be able to give any specific numbers. I can -- as I told you, we continue to ensure that technology is going to be our key driver in terms of our main business. But as a policy, we don't give any future outlook.
Okay. Sir, my second question is, in this financial year, as we speak by, have we revised or has there been any revision in terms of prices in transaction charges or annual issuer charges?
No, not yet.
And in FY '24, since this is being duopolistic, are we envisaging any upward revision in either of these charges?
That will be driven by basically the regulator. So we'll have to see how that pans out. And that's, again, futuristic, so we'll have to wait and watch.
So have we taken it up with the regulator? Have we put in an application for upward revision in the charges for the same?
Again, there are various points. It is -- I don't think these are really put out in basically the public domain on our conversation with the regulator. But all as I can say as and when, if at all, it is approved, it will be put out in the public domain.
The next question is from the line of Paresh G. Sangani from Club Millionaire.
Yes. The first question is, we have seen a big jump in the employee cost almost more than 30% on a Y-o-Y basis. Wanted to know how many people have been added, I mean, which divisions or functions are these people being assigned to?
Yes. So I'll -- we -- generally, we don't give the count out, but I am saying the areas which are going to be in focus is basically the regulatory area, because there we are going to be a regulatory focus, technology are the 2 key areas.
And obviously, overall, basically the operations also as our number of demat accounts and our size of the operations grow. So these are the 3 principal areas in which we are growing. However, there is an overall increase in our operations. So the ancillary support functions will also continue to see a growth.
Okay. Noted. And Nehal, has there been any increase in our repository business in terms of people being added over there, because KYC would come into being just before of 1st of January and even digitization announcement have come due from November. So have you added headcount over there? And how are we well positioned on that?
We are going through our own internal process of kind of -- it's a continuous process of basically assessing the requirements as per the business opportunities. And that is again futuristic. So we will have to wait and watch how that pans out. But we are fully aware of the business opportunity, and we continue to kind of embark upon putting that right kind of people there to ensure that we are able to really explore and execute basically the business opportunity, which is there.
Nehal, I understand, I don't want any futuristic guidance there. I'm referring to the expenses that have been incurred for the past quarter in terms of employees or manpower that you guided on the insurance side? I mean, is there a headcount or is there...
It is going through its own process of recruitment, et cetera. So that is something in process. So...
Okay. And generally, Nehal, we now, almost 8 years-plus, right, that we have not had a price increase. I know discussions are being on and sometimes not being on as well. What is the plateau on it? Because if you see the costs have actually gone up in terms of technology, as you mentioned, regulatory costs have gone up, compliance costs have gone up, operational technology, manpower cost has gone up, right, we've gone up to IIT chargings. So what is status on that?
So again, there are 2 ways of looking at it. On one side, there are certain costs which grow on a certain year-on-year basis or after a period of time. Sometimes the costs are even expected to go down, that is what is the expectation. So where this particular thing will fall, we'll have to wait and watch.
The important thing is that as ethos again and as a focus is that we want to have as many more people joining our fold, make it easier for them. Because any sales is a function of 2 aspects. One is the rate we charge and also the number of people who are joining, the volume of business. So what is the -- rate is basically what -- basically the regulator will decide and we will take into consideration a lot of points before it moves forward. But at least where the volume is something, we want to create that value kind of proposition so that more and more people can join us.
Sure. Has there been any discussions with the SEBI on this, Nehal, in terms of giving a price hike?
Sorry, Paresh, I'll have to kind of -- we don't discuss our regulatory conversations in basically the public domain. So I would really request you that we can keep that...
The next question is from the line of [ Ravinder Singh Sikand ] from GSS.
My question is relating to the malware attack. I think somebody had already brought the subject up. Was any data compromised. And considering that you are doing KYC, isn't it something that should be on updates given to shareholders and the public more frequently than just a onetime press release?
So it is going through its own process of the regulatory interactions. At a suitable time, we will be giving out whatever is required to be done, but it is a process of certain amount of confidentiality, which has been -- which has to be maintained from the overall scheme of things and that regulatory kind of -- regulatory interactions which we are going through.
I would like to kind of really assure you that the highest level of security has been imposed, and there will not be any situation to really think about that there are any compromise, which is -- which would be -- which has happened in terms of in that, but we continue to work on ensuring that the security is at its highest level.
I would request you to that we are going through a regulatory process and in terms of once at an appropriate time, we will be able to give that out.
And second -- follow-up question would be, how do you benchmark the technology that you're using? Do you compare it to what is used and what is comparable in, say, the United States and Europe, more developed economies? Are you benchmarking it against something? Or is that an OS that you're using?
And secondly, your password, considering you say that you're investing heavily in technology, have you seen the password that you use is only alphanumeric. It doesn't allow you to use special characters, isn't that something that you should be concerned about or has no one looked into this?
No. So we will take that because there are multiple ways of security. Password is just one angle. There are other ways in which it is being done. But however, I'll ask my security teams to look at that going forward. I'm sure that we have other mechanisms in which also the things have been made secured. In terms of how we benchmark ourselves, India is at a very unique position where we have a more -- most of the Western world is -- on the depository space is on a B2B business.
There is no client level visibility, which is given. It's the intermediary, which gives the visibility to the client. Whilst in India, we have more of where the customer is able to view his or her demat account directly with the CDSL.
And in that sense, we are far superior. Even basically the authorization of onetime passports, et cetera, directly happens with the customer with CDSL, which is kind of unique to the world in terms of the businesses security.
No. But are we using an OS that is globally acceptable? Is this a home-developed operating system? Is it updated? Because the app or the website never asks for any updates, any security updates ever. I've never -- as a user I've never ever had to update my, the website or the app and I use an Apple phone. On the Apple, there's no update on the app.
So what is the OS that we're using -- that you're using for this? And the password is the only access that a customer has to enter the site? What is the -- when you said multiple means of securing the account, the password is the only entry into the website, into a customer's this thing, what are the multiple points that you are referring to?
So whenever there is transaction, which has to be conducted, there is a transaction pin and there's a onetime password which is required mandatorily, which is the additional forms of security, and that keeps on changing.
This is -- it goes to a 2-factor authentication. Besides that, over and above that, every transaction is mapped with the obligation with the clearing corporation also at an individual level before the transfer takes place. That's why there are multiple forms of checks, which are taking place.
Before these things move forward, even on basically, the pledge mechanism, basically the margin pledge mechanism also, there's a one-time password to be put it before the transaction moves forward. So it is not just basically the password, but there are various modes in which the transaction is getting secured.
Okay. But I don't know if anyone is actually following your Twitter feed. There are so many complaints every day on the lack of response to customer queries. Has anyone audited how your customer representatives actually interact with the individual customers? Is there any audit on that? I mean do you actually check dispute resolution?
Because if you look at your Twitter feed, it is full of people complaining and comparing. I know it's not a good thing, but one, you need to be aware, the people comparing your -- comparing CDSL with an STL in terms of response, in terms of customer query resolution. Is anyone auditing this? And has this been -- has this ever been discussed by anybody?
Yes, this is closely being monitored. And I -- as far as my review and reporting goes, most of the queries have been satisfactorily resolved and replied to. In fact, the continuous growth in demat accounts or the new demat accounts testifies that this is something which the market at large has been fairly, fairly satisfied with.
Yes. And the last point, you made a comment saying that you have -- in your opening remarks, working towards building wealth for investors. Market cap has eroded by nearly 70% in the last year or about 1 year, 1.5 years. What value are you creating?
See, I think the point is that it's important to ensure in a market infrastructure institutional business. And this is a long-term play. We are creating the infrastructure for the country as a whole. And these are the lines of business which has to be seen in that perspective and in that context other than on a quarter-on-quarter basis.
No, this is over a year, right? I mean we...
No, just hear me out. Also, you will need to see what has been the market conditions at large. But there are basically the other extraneous factors which have taken place, be it basically the geopolitical issues, the interest issues, which have really impacted the market.
So I think every stock is kind of being mapped to the overall market conditions and not in its basically isolation. The important thing as a focus for a market infrastructure institution is to ensure that the company is focusing on building the right building blocks so that as and when the business opportunity is growing, it has the right toolkit within itself to ensure that, that growth is basically executed.
I take this with the spirit in which you have answered because I'm a very, very long-term investor. I've been investing in the stock from the time of the IPO. But my only request is that the security aspect be strengthened and we get a little more detail on what exactly we're using.
I mean is it absolutely safe for -- we don't want to be taken by -- you don't want to be blindsided by another malware attack or something that we read about only in the press.
And the other thing is that please whoever is handling your Twitter feed, please handle it with a little more sensitivity, because the responses just do not match up to what you've just said over the telephone. It just does not match up. So if someone deals with this with a little more eye to detail, it would be nice.
Thank you.
[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Prithvish Uppal from Asian Market Securities.
Sir, I just wanted to know from a data-keeping perspective, what is the split of annual issuer charges from the slab and folio-based method? That's the first. And again, in terms of annual insurance charges, what would be the split between listed and unlisted? Because this is something we used to provide earlier.
The first charge we don't provide in the public domain. I'll ask second one...
So second, first, please, unlisted -- the income from unlisted is at INR 88.65 lakhs during this quarter and INR 3.66 crore for the 9 months.
Okay. Because, sir, I think one of your Q1 '19 calls, you've given the split between the slab and folio-based. So, or if you could just give any color like your total income, which -- how the growth has been from either the slab -- from both the slab and folio based? And as a mix, how that would have possibly moved as well?
So if we look at our annual issuer income -- and if you look at last year, it was at INR 29 crore. However, this quarter, if you look at our income, it is at INR 47 crores. So it has moved positively, and the increase is almost 57%.
Sir, I was asking more from a perspective of how much the growth would have been driven from folios and how much would have been driven from slab?
We don't give that as part of our disclosures.
The next question is from the line of [ Hemanth ], an Individual Investor.
Sir, the first question which I have is, we have basically seen the revenue decline over the past few quarters, maybe 2 to 3 quarters. So what is the reason behind the decline in the revenue? And from when we can expect an upstream?
So revenue is a function of, again, as I said earlier, it's a function of the overall market volumes to some extent and to some extent, is kind of really an annuity. So to the extent of the impact of the overall markets have seen. So as and when we see the market picking up on its volumes and the level of activity at that point of time, we'll be able to see that. But again, that's a futuristic question, so I'll not be able to give a specific answer on that.
And sir, you have given the split between the annual issuer charges of the unlisted and the listed, I think you mentioned INR 89 lakhs of unlisted. What is it from the listed company?
So I had -- see our total annual issuer income for the quarter is at INR 45 crores, okay? And unlisted -- income from unlisted is INR 89 lakhs. The remaining is from listed companies.
Okay. And sir, just a basic question from my end. Could the KYC part, which we are doing it from a subsidiary, is it only related to the mutual fund KYC or is it across? It may be a basic question to you.
No, it is across. It is across.
The next question is from the line of [ Rahul Agarwal ], an Individual Investor.
I have a question regarding the EGI. Could you please comment about the EGI revenue that has been...
We don't give us a product-specific revenue. And it is in the process of it will start going forward, but we don't give any product-specific revenue.
Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today. I would now like to hand the conference over to the management for closing comments. Over to you, sir.
Yes. Thank you. To that one query on the Twitter feeds, I've just got an update from my team, I just thought I'll give you, that we do a weekly review of all the Twitter feeds and whether they have been replied. And so far, we found basically satisfactorily, it has been replied.
However, we will take your feedback on record, and we will see if there have been anything which has not been replied to. In terms of overall, I would like to request all of you all to remain safe and sound and continue to be happy shareholders of CDSL. Thank you.
Thank you. On behalf of Axis Capital Limited, that concludes this conference call. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.