TG Therapeutics Inc
NASDAQ:TGTX
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
12.49
35.07
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q2-2024 Analysis
TG Therapeutics Inc
TG Therapeutics has experienced a remarkable quarter, primarily driven by the successful launch of its flagship drug, BRIUMVI, for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). In Q2 2024, BRIUMVI achieved net sales of $72.6 million in the U.S., surpassing the projected target of around $65 million. This considerable increase signifies about 45% growth quarter-over-quarter and an astounding 350% year-over-year growth compared to the same quarter in the previous year.
The company has adjusted its full-year revenue guidance upward, projecting total sales between $290 million and $300 million for 2024, an increase from the previous estimate of $270 million to $290 million. This optimistic forecast reflects not only the initial sales success but also the robust demand for BRIUMVI, confirming the drug's potential to capture a larger market share in the competitive landscape of anti-CD20 therapies.
TG Therapeutics' commercial strategies have shown impressive results, particularly with over 1,400 new patient scripts processed through the TG hub, marking a 12% increase from the previous quarter. The total number of new prescriptions written to the hub stands at approximately 5,850 across 525 centers, with continuing growth in prescribers and accounts. Notably, the company secured a contract with the Department of Veteran Affairs, designating BRIUMVI as the preferred treatment for MS, which further broadens its patient base.
While commercialization is a primary focus, TG Therapeutics is also advancing its R&D initiatives. The recovery phase is being enhanced with studies such as the ENHANCE trial, which is investigating the switch from other anti-CD20 therapies to BRIUMVI, and preliminary data show a safe transition could greatly benefit patient populations. Moreover, the company is pursuing the development of subcutaneous delivery options for BRIUMVI, with a pivotal trial expected to begin by mid-2025, indicating future growth avenues.
The financial position of TG Therapeutics has been bolstered by BRIUMVI's success, leading to the first cash flow positive quarter, with approximately $217 million in cash and equivalents. Additionally, the company announced a $100 million share repurchase plan, funded by a newly established $250 million credit facility that also sets aside resources for R&D and commercial initiatives. This move reflects a commitment to returning value to shareholders while ensuring sustained growth.
Operational expenses for Q2 were lower than expected at about $47 million, positioning the company well with a GAAP net income of approximately $6.9 million. Analysts noted that the focus remains on balancing operational expenses and revenue growth, projecting a solid profitability trend moving forward. Management anticipates maintaining positive net income and cash flows as the company continues scaling operations.
Despite the positive momentum, the company acknowledged potential seasonal impacts on growth, particularly in Q3 due to vacation periods among healthcare providers. However, the overall sentiment remains strong, with expectations for a robust Q4 as the market recovers. Investors should closely monitor the performance of BRIUMVI, particularly in light of upcoming data releases from ongoing trials and the overall market acceptance in various healthcare sectors.
Greetings. Welcome to TG Therapeutics' Second Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note this conference is being recorded.
I'll now turn the conference over to Jenna Bosco. Jenna, you may now begin.
Thank you. Welcome, everyone, and thanks for joining us this morning. I'm Jenna Bosco, and with me today to discuss the second quarter 2024 financial results are Michael Weiss, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Adam Waldman, our Chief Commercialization Officer; and Sean Power, our Chief Financial Officer.
Following our safe harbor statement, Mike will provide an overview of our recent corporate developments. Adam will share an update on our commercialization efforts, and Sean will give an overview of our financial results before turning the call over to the operator to begin the Q&A session.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone that we will be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements about our anticipated future operating and financial performance, including sales performance, projected regulatory or clinical milestones, revenue guidance, development plans and expectations for our marketed product.
TG cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated. Factors that may affect TG Therapeutics' operations include various risk factors that can be found in our SEC filings.
In addition, any forward-looking statements made on this call represent our views only as of today and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any later date. We specifically disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. This conference call is being recorded for audio rebroadcast on TG's website, www.tgtherapeutics.com, where it will be available for the next 30 days.
With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Mike Weiss, our CEO.
Thank you, Jenna, and good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our quarterly earnings call. I'm pleased to report that we had another quarter of outperformance across all aspects of our business, marked by the continued successful launch of our flagship drug BRIUMVI, which was approved about 18 months ago for patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. The market response has been overwhelmingly positive and our sales performance has exceeded our initial projections. Let me start by highlighting some key achievements for the second quarter of 2024.
First, on the commercial front, I'm pleased to share that we achieved $72.6 million in BRIUMVI net sales in the United States, exceeding our target of approximately $65 million, leading us to raise our full year guidance to approximately $290 million to $300 million. That's up from $270 million to $290 million from last quarter, which was already raised from our preliminary guidance of $220 million to $260 million provided at the beginning of the year.
Our commercial team has done an outstanding job and executing our launch strategy resulting in strong initial adoption. This early success reinforces our confidence in BRIUMVI's long-term potential to reach our goal of becoming the leading treatment for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis on a dynamic market share basis.
On the R&D front, we also had a very productive quarter. While commercialization of BRIUMVI remains our core focus, we continue to explore ways to improve upon the delivery of BRIUMVI, explore potentially new indications for BRIUMVI and advance our newly acquired allogeneic off-the-shelf CD19 CAR-T for autoimmune diseases. At the same time, we continue to evaluate opportunities to expand our pipeline.
Specifically some R&D highlights for the quarter included our ENHANCE study, which is evaluating ways to streamline the switch to BRIUMVI from other anti-CD20s, continued [ into ] robust enrollment. We were also able to present preliminary data from the study at the ACTRIMS conference showing that patients can safely be transitioned from other anti-CD20 to BRIUMVI without the [ use ] for the first dose of 150 milligram over 4 hours in those patients that enter the study with low B cell counts. We'll look forward to sharing additional data from the ENHANCE trial in the coming months.
Another highlight was that we treated our first MS patients with subcutaneous BRIUMVI in a newly launched Phase I study to assess bio-equivalents of subcu versus IV BRIUMVI. This was a high priority for the team and I'm proud of their efforts to get this study initiated quickly. As mentioned in the past, we believe the subcu and IV CD20 markets are distinct and believe this could represent a significant additional opportunity for the BRIUMVI franchise. We believe we will be in a position to share data from this study early next year, and we are still targeting starting a pivotal trial for subcutaneous BRIUMVI by mid-2025.
And finally, related to another high priority R&D program, we were excited to report that the U.S. FDA has cleared our investigational new drug application or IND for azer-cel and off-the-shelf allogeneic CD19 CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of autoimmune diseases.
As a reminder, earlier this year, we entered into a partnership with Precision Biosciences to acquire a worldwide license to azer-cel for indications outside of cancer. With an active IND now in hand, we believe we are on track to launch a Phase I in autoimmune diseases initially in patients with progressive MS by the end of this year.
Next, I'd like to highlight our financial position and discuss the share repurchase program we announced this morning. The strong launch of BRIUMVI has positively impacted our financial results, including leading to our first operationally cash flow positive quarter.
Sean Power, our CFO, will join shortly to discuss our financial performance in more detail, but I wanted to touch on our newly established 5-year $250 million credit facility with HealthCare Royalty and Blue Owl Capital. The proceeds will first be used to repay, essentially refinance our approximately $170 million of indebtedness and accrued interest owed to Hercules Capital Partners, which was set to mature in tranches from mid-2025 to January of 2026.
Another $100 million of proceeds has been allocated to fund up to a $100 million share repurchase plan, which was recently authorized by our Board of Directors. The remainder will simply be added to working capital, providing us with additional operational flexibility.
We've been talking about the potential for a share buyback publicly and we're excited to establish this credit facility, which allows us to accelerate our ability to repurchase shares. We see TG as a growth story setting up for possible significant cash flows in the future, and we're committed to sharing that value with our shareholders. This repurchase program is just the first step in that process.
Importantly, this new credit facility enables us to repurchase shares without utilizing our current cash, which is dedicated to continuing to build out our commercial infrastructure and footprint, growing our marketing efforts, including growing our direct to patient initiatives and finally investing in our R&D programs.
In closing, I want to thank the entire TG team for their dedication and hard work in making this quarter a success. We're excited about the positive impact we're making in patients' lives and the value we're creating for our shareholders.
With that, I'll hand the call over to Adam Waldman, our Chief Commercialization Officer, to walk you through our commercial performance in more detail. Adam, go ahead, please.
Thank you, Mike, and good morning, everyone. I'm thrilled to share our commercial progress for the second quarter of 2024. Building on the momentum from the first quarter, we have once again delivered strong performance across all key metrics, continuing our commitment to bringing BRIUMVI to patients with relapsing forms of MS.
As Mike mentioned, we achieved second quarter net sales of $72.6 million, exceeding our target of $65 million and reflecting approximately 45% growth quarter-over-quarter and 350% growth from the same quarter last year. We saw strong growth in patient enrollments with over 1,400 new patient scripts processed through the TG hub, marking a 12% increase from the previous quarter. We have now had approximately 5,850 new patient prescriptions written to our hub across 525 centers from over 950 prescribers launched to date. We are very pleased with the rate of adoption, but also remember that since not all new prescriptions go to our TG hub, these numbers underestimate the total new patient scripts for BRIUMVI.
For the second quarter, we estimate that the hub captured only about 80% to 85% of total new scripts, and as more and more academic centers and independent infusion centers adopt BRIUMVI, this hub capture rate could go down further as these types of centers are less likely to utilize our TG hub services.
BRIUMVI continues to gain share in a large and rapidly-growing anti-CD20 market in the RMS. Strong share growth and patient adherence is leading to significant revenue growth for the CD20 class overall year-over-year. The class now represents an approximately $2 billion quarterly revenue opportunity in the U.S. with IV therapies capturing approximately 70% of that. We would expect that the class will continue to grow going forward and BRIUMVI will continue to grow within it.
We have seen our prescriber base continue to expand, adding approximately 150 new prescribers and over 70 new accounts in quarter 2. Many of these new prescribers are coming from leading academic centers, further establishing BRIUMVI's presence in the MS treatment landscape. Some have also started to come from the VA.
As previously announced, we successfully expanded our market reach by securing a contract with the Department of Veteran Affairs making BRIUMVI the preferred anti-CD20 treatment for relapsing forms of MS among veterans. This strategic partnership, which went into effect on June 17th, not only broadens our patient base, but also reinforces BRIUMVI's value proposition. We believe this partnership creates access not only to a new group of patients, but also treating physicians that in many cases have dual appointments at the VA and in academia.
Overall, we continue to see strong new patient accumulations, reflecting our effective commercial strategies and operational excellence. We believe our strategic investments in field force expansion and patient marketing initiatives are yielding high returns, contributing to our overall growth trajectory.
Patient access to BRIUMVI remains our top priority. Our comprehensive patient support programs have been instrumental in assisting patients with accessing BRIUMVI and working to ensure they receive the treatment they need. We have received very positive feedback from both patients and healthcare providers about the support and resources available to get patients started on therapy, and our patient adherence at week 24 remains strong.
The diversity of patient types being treated with BRIUMVI remains consistent. We continue to see a balance mix of patients who are treatment naive, those switching from non-CD20 therapies and those switching from other CD20 therapies. This broad adoption is a testament to BRIUMVI's compelling clinical profile and its differentiation in the marketplace.
Looking ahead, we are optimistic about the continued growth and potential of BRIUMVI. Based on current trends in both new patient accumulations and persistence, we are raising our full year guidance, which was $270 million to $290 million to $290 million and $300 million for the year. We expect the quarters to continue to build and have considered the seasonality we saw last year in Q3. We therefore would expect more modest growth from Q2 to Q3 with stronger growth from Q3 to Q4.
In conclusion, I want to extend my gratitude to our dedicated team for their relentless efforts in driving the success of BRIUMVI. Their hard work and commitment has been crucial in achieving these remarkable results. I also want to thank the healthcare providers and patients for their trust in TG Therapeutics. Together we're making significant strides in improving outcomes for individuals living with MS. We're excited about the future and remain focused on our mission to bring BRIUMVI to more patients, helping them live better lives. Thank you.
And with that, I'll hand the call over to Sean Power, our CFO. Sean?
Thank you, Adam, and thanks, everyone, for joining us. Earlier this morning, we reported our detailed second quarter 2024 financial results, which can be viewed on the Investors and Media section of our website.
Before I get into the results for the quarter, I'd like to begin by briefly discussing the accounting matter we described in 8-K filed earlier this morning. During our second quarter review, we identified an error which was deemed to be immaterial related to the expense recognition of a single restricted stock grant from 2021. This error was isolated to 2021 and 2022 and does not impact results of operations in any other or subsequent period.
Although the error was determined to be immaterial to all relevant financial statements, it was determined that this represented material weakness in the company's internal control over financial reporting related to controls around non-routine stock awards, which will require some disclosure in our 10-Q this quarter and an amendment to our 2023 10-K that will be filed later this week. We are already in the process of updating our internal controls relative to these equity grants and expect the material weakness will be fully remediated before December 31st of this year.
Now, let's turn to the financial results for the quarter. We are pleased to report that we were both cash flow positive and generated net income in the second quarter of '24. We ended the quarter with approximately $217 million in cash, cash equivalents and investment securities, up $7 million from Q1 and flat from year end. This was of course made possible by the strong quarter of BRIUMVI with $72.6 million of U.S. BRIUMVI net product revenue, which is up more than 350% over the comparable quarter in '23.
Our OpEx excluding non-cash items during the second quarter came in below guided ranges at approximately $47 million, roughly in line with Q1 '24 when excluding the one-time charges seen during Q1 2024. Our OpEx for the first 6 months of 2024 is approximately $105 million. We're averaging just over $50 million per quarter, again below our guided range. As discussed briefly earlier, our GAAP net income for the 3 months ended was $6.9 million or $0.04 per diluted share. When excluding non-cash items, net income for the period was approximately $16.4 million.
And finally, I'll close by touching briefly on today's announcement of a new $250 million debt facility with Healthcare Royalty and Blue Owl Capital. We were pleased to be able to refinance our existing debt to a facility with a longer term duration and attractive financial terms. As Mike discussed, this will provide us with sufficient resources to execute on our share repurchase program also announced today as well as continue to invest in the BRIUMVI commercial opportunity.
With that, I will now turn the call back over to the conference operator to begin the Q&A.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Roger Song with Jefferies.
Maybe the first one, Mike, you can comment on the current dynamic market share? As we recall, [ we ] have been seeing you're getting around 10%, just curious about this quarter? And then also what's the near term goal for the dynamic market share understanding you want to become the #1 dynamic market share in the future?
Yes, of course, our goal is to get to that #1 position. We're working hard at it. We got to have a goal, so we're going to keep driving at it. Yes, I mean, look, I don't know, with 1,400 out of 10,000 approx -- I mean, again, remember we're using approximate numbers, but we assume again, about 10,000 patients will start a new therapy. So that's the dynamic share per quarter. If we had 1,400 enrollments into the hub, which as Adam said, probably represents only about 80%, 85% of the total prescriptions, we are tracking toward sort of into that 15%-ish range give or take. But again, it's not fully baked. But yes, I think we're doing great. I mean, the team is out there hustling, they're working hard. The drug is performing well and we're going to continue to push toward our goal.
And then in terms of the allo CD19 CAR, your first indication of progressive MS, just biologically, can you comment on how you think about the CD19 versus CD20 for this particular sub population of the MS? And then also, when you start the trial, what are the targeted population for the progressive MS if you are targeting certain severity or any baseline characteristics you want to do the initial study?
Thanks, Roger. So yes, I mean, CD20 versus CD19, I don't know that there's a huge difference in MS specifically. I mean, CD19 has a broader coverage in pre-B cells and short-lived plasma cells, which has some advantages in some areas, potentially some disadvantage in others. And that might be disadvantageous in MS if you were constantly treating these patients given that we think this will be a one-time treatment, or if it's not one-time, it'll be separated by a significant amount of time.
I think the CD19 is quite a good approach for MS. And again, the goal for this treatment would be to have a very deep and robust B cell depletion across tissues within the systemic system. But of course, in the central that would create potentially a best-in-class treatment. And then you release and you hopefully let the B cells come back. Hopefully they're reset to be non-immunogenic B cells and that would be ideal. And of course, you'd be able to then leave long gaps, potentially use it as a one-time treatment or very long gaps between treatment.
So I think generally speaking, CD20 probably -- if you're going to be repeating treatments, probably CD20 a little bit better for MS. If you're looking at something that has a one-time treatment, CD19 may have some advantages in that case. You had a second part to that question, Roger, which of course, I lost myself in the answer, but is there more to that question?
Yes, just curious about the progressive MS, any specific baseline population or baseline patient characteristics you want to target in your initial clinical trial?
Not really. No. I mean, I think we're open to all progressive patients, so that is definitely the unmet medical need in MS right now. So yes, we're excited to get into those patients. So it could be primary progressive, it could be secondary progressive, secondary progressive that are inactive, secondary progressive that are active. We're sort of agnostic to that group. We just want to make sure we're hitting progressive patients and hopefully, like I said, deep tissue penetration and CNS penetration would be great for that disease.
The next question is from the line of Matt Kaplan with Ladenburg Thalmann.
I guess a few questions. First on the pipeline you mentioned that you started the subcu program. Can you give us a little bit more sense in terms of potential profile of your subcu from a frequency and delivery point of view?
Yes. So there is one subcu on the market. It's currently dosed once per month in a, I'd say, relatively elegant auto injector format. But it still needs to be taken once a month, and you still have to deal with getting that drug to the patient once a month. So there's definitely logistical issues that can arise.
The other that is not yet in the market, but potentially could be here in September, is a subcu version of Ocrevus. That one is a bit more clunky. You need to either have it pushed over 10 minutes to 15 minutes by a healthcare provider or used with a pump format where they attach a pump, but it will cause some bruising, some swelling, some reaction. So I think that's a bit more clunky than the elegance of a subcu auto injector.
Our goal is to find ourselves somewhere in the middle, something that's less frequent than -- and the subcu Ocrevus will be every 6 months if it's approved. The goal is to have something that's less frequently than once a month and more elegant than large volume subcu that is seen with the Ocrevus. So yes, I mean, look, we think the elegance of subcu auto injector is the gold standard. And we'd like to get ourselves there, and we'd just like it to be less frequently than once a month.
And then in your prepared remarks, you mentioned along with your guidance -- increased guidance, some seasonality to expect between second quarter to third quarter versus third to fourth. Can you talk a little bit about that, how we should think about that? And then also congrats on your first quarter in terms of achieving profitability from your underlying business. Is that something we should expect kind of going forward?
Sure. Adam, you want to take that seasonality question and then we'll come back to the profitability question?
Sure, yes. Historically, we have seen the MS market does tend to slow down [ touching ] -- in the summer months you have both patients and physicians taking vacations. So you have seen that historically, and we saw it last year, so we would expect to see it this year.
You also have the added -- with this year being a little bit unique in the ACTRIMS conference has moved into quarter 3 versus quarter 4 last year. And we did see some softening around ACTRIMS last year with a lot of physicians from the U.S. attending that conference. So those 2 things we think will contribute to the guidance that we provided. But overall, we're very confident, obviously in the long-term. We've raised our full year guidance and that's just more of a seasonality [indiscernible].
And then on the profitability side I'll take a crack and Sean's here to help and correct me if I get this wrong. But I think on an operating basis, we should maintain profitability going forward. Again, those are impacted -- on a GAAP basis that will be impacted, or net income will be impacted by things like non-cash comp. Our cash flow profitability will be impacted by things like inventory build.
So we're in that sort of fringe area where some of those things will affect. But I assume, as we get further into the year, we'll get closer and closer to both, regardless of whether we're buying inventory or regardless of the non-GAAP -- or non-cash stuff, we'll maintain both positive net income and cash flow.
But certainly on an operations basis, as you can see, the expenses, as Sean mentioned, are even lower than expected. We're trying to spend it, we've added to our team, we're increasing our marketing budget, we're continuing to do that, we will continue to do that. But certainly we don't expect that the expenses could outpace the revenue growth at this point. Sean, anything to add on top of that?
No, I think you nailed it, Mike. I think that's perfect.
Our next questions come from the line of Michael DiFiore with Evercore ISI.
A few questions from me. Number one, like how do you perceive the initial launch of subcu Ocrevus impacting account penetration for the balance of the year? I mean, you've obviously increased guidance, but I was wondering if you're hearing anything from the field that may have helped boost your outlook in this regard? And I have 2 follow ups.
Sure. Adam, you want to go ahead and talk a little about what we're expecting from the launch of subcu Ocrevus?
Sure. Our teams are obviously -- will be prepped and ready for the launch of the product [ extension ] there for Ocrevus. But honestly, we haven't detected a lot of enthusiasm for this product with our customer base. We've heard concerns around complex administration nurse training required, potential side effect profile. So our interpretation today is we don't think it will have a significant impact in the U.S. market. But that's today we sit here and that's our view from talking to many, many customers.
The second question is just, any update on gross-to-net dynamics in Q2, any outlook for the balance of the year, as well as if you could comment on any inventory dynamics in Q2?
Sorry, Mike, could you repeat the first part of that question?
Yes, I was wondering if you could just clarify or -- any gross-to-net dynamics in Q2 and the outlook on gross-to-net for the balance of the year, as well as comment on whether there was any inventory dynamics to be noted in 2Q?
Yes. Gross-to-net was similar to previous quarters and no material change, and inventory, nothing to note. Nothing that was unexpected.
My final question to you, any update on the [ EU ] launch? I mean, any feedback from large academic centers there, and have you noticed any notable differences compared to the initial rollout of BRIUMVI in the U.S.?
Yes. Mike, you want me take that one?
Adam, you're on a roll. Keep going.
So [ as you know ], Mike, they launched it in Germany. We're still preparing for the launch, waiting for reimbursement on several other countries. But the feedback has been very positive. They are gaining momentum both in the academic centers, but also interestingly in the community centers as well. They're getting feedback that the 1-hour infusion is particularly attractive in those centers from an efficiency standpoint.
So overall, it's been going well. As far as the comparison to the U.S. launch, I think similar in that there is good uptake and enthusiasm for the product profile. And we'll see how they continue to go there and we're looking forward to seeing more countries launch in -- later this year or early next year.
Our next questions are from the line of Eric Joseph with JPMorgan.
I guess just first on the updated guidance, I guess, what does that anticipate [ in terms of ] pull through via the VA contract, I guess any sort of range you can kind of put around that?
And then, I'm also curious to know what kind of incremental visibility you had this quarter on [ inter ] CD20 switching to BRIUMVI? How much switches contributed to BRIUMVI uptake, and also where you think that might go with additional data from the enhanced trial?
And then secondly Mike, you commented on sort of additional expenditure to support the launch here. I guess, how should we be thinking about sort of the build and SG&A the next couple of quarters, and I guess ultimately looking long-term, I guess, how should be thinking about sort of the commercial margin, the profitability of the BRIUMVI franchise?
Sure. Thanks, Eric, [ for ] the 3-part questionnaire. I think Adam, if you want, maybe the first one was updated guidance, how it may be impacted by the VA? Do you want to start there?
Yes. So the guidance includes the VA, but I would say that the VA, I think we mentioned on the call last time, would not be a material impact in 2024. We're in the early stages of the launch at the VA. It's been about a month since the contract went into place. At this point, I would say 10% to 15% perhaps of the VA centers of excellence have utilized BRIUMVI. It's -- The contract is specifically for new patients. And so I don't expect -- although our guidance includes, it's not a major driver of the overall guidance.
And then your second question was on switches from CD20. Switches from CD20 remain consistent quarter-to-quarter. We've seen a good amount of our overall patient population being switched from CD20. And yes, we would expect with more data in the ENHANCE trial and making it easier to switch patients. We know that there are many patients that complain of crap-gap and other issues around tolerability of other CD20s. And we believe it's an attractive market, and it's been nice to see it stay consistent since launch in terms of percentage of patients switching over from CD20. And then I don't remember the third part.
Yes, I've got that one. That one was directed at me, so -- although you could help him, so could Sean probably. But -- so the question was on the launch, build and SG&A and then sort of long-term where we see that going. So, yes, I mean, look, we had a very focused strategy when we started the launch and we sized the team for that strategy. And we always said that we will grow the team and basically reinvest the revenues to build out the team.
The SG&A and total OpEx for this year of $250 million baked in a growth of the team. Over the course of the year, like I said, I think since the launch, certainly in like the core field teams themselves versus sort of management level positions, we've close to doubled, I think, our field force, or at least grown more than 50% the field force and that continues to grow. I mean, I get requests for new hires in the field nearly every day, certainly once or twice a week. So the team is growing, but that's, again, all baked into that that OpEx number of -- again, it's about $250 million, I'm not going to say exact, and obviously we've been running a little bit below for the year so far.
But I think we're just going to still stick with approximately $250 million in OpEx for the year. As we move into next year, I'm confident the OpEx that we target will be higher, I think incrementally higher. We're certainly -- like I said, the team will continue to grow our marketing budget. Again, we were very specific early on that we wanted to focus on clinician awareness, HCP awareness, and that was really a field-based endeavor. We're going to obviously continue to do that, and as we said, we're growing that. But Phase II of the launch, we've talked about this a bit, and we've already increased, again, which is already in this year's budget, our online direct to patient marketing efforts. And we're going to continue to grow that budget as we get into next year.
Long-term, again, I can see we'll continue to incrementally -- at some point the team is probably fully maxed out. So that will cap out and then the marketing budget will be the marketing budget that we think is appropriate. But like I said, my hope and expectation is that our incremental spend in OpEx and SG&A over time is measured and incremental whereas the revenue should be relatively gapping up every year, and we have a really nice accumulation effect as we continue, hopefully to build our market share and grow that out.
The new starts will continue to build as well. So all of that on top of -- itself is why I quoted earlier that I could potentially see significant cash flows as we move forward. But yes, I mean, I think long-term the margins should be solid. I mean, I've looked at some of the best operating margins in biotech out there. I've seen, I think Vertex, Regeneron have done an amazing job in keeping their OpEx high. There's a few other companies out there. I think we could be in a leading position in terms of OpEx to revenue, so OpEx margins.
Our next question is from the line of Mayank Mamtani with B. Riley Securities.
Congrats on a solid quarter. So quick 2-part on commercial metrics. Adam, if you could update on the persistence rate you're seeing, and if you guys can qualitatively talk to an year-end market share target, be it within new-to-class or intra class sort of switch segments? And then I have a quick follow up.
Yes, the persistence rate at week 24 continues to be solid. And as expected, what we've said before is we expected it to be around high 80s. And that's what we saw -- at least what Ocrevus saw and we're [ laid ] in that ballpark. So the range is very strong there.
In terms of market share, I'm not going to give a specific market share that we think we're going to hit by the end of the year. I just think to reiterate what Mike has said and what we said in the call, we're going to continue to add more and more prescribers and we're going to continue to grow in a growing market. And that's what we're focused on every day and we continue to see that we're getting traction and we'll continue to focus on doing that. And like I said, our goal is to be the #1 prescribed MS therapy in terms of dynamic care.
And then at ACTRIMS, I see you're presenting an update to ENHANCE study results. Maybe just talk to what's new and incremental there and what sort of the healthcare provider feedback to -- the data you've generated to date? And also, I noticed there's a deliberative Phase III [ late ] breaker, Gemini and Hercules program data coming also at ACTRIMS. Would love to hear your latest thoughts on how you are thinking -- the BTK drug class impact on your sort of long range plan, recognizing the results have been relatively mixed recently?
Thanks for the questions. So obviously, we can't talk anything about ACTRIMS. The notifications and abstracts have not been released yet, so can't say anything about that. But I can answer your second part of your question about HCP feedback to the results we have presented previously. And I think the feedback has been extremely positive.
I think people -- intuitively, if they have a CD20 patient that walks in the door who's already relatively well B cell depleted but is having some other issue, whether it's crap-gap or had some relapse, they don't feel that there's a need to go through the 150 milligram dose, which is in some respects a de-bulking dose where we take down the B cells so we can give a full proper dose 2 weeks later at 450 milligrams in 1 hour.
So yes, I think that the people are happy to see that -- happy and not surprised to see that you can safely transition those patients to do that. So, yes, I think that's a net positive thus far. And like I said, in the coming months, we'd like to present more data from that trial.
In terms of BTK, I mean, look, I think most folks would believe at this point, regardless of whether one or several of the BTKs are successful in relapsing forms of MS, it's more likely than not to be an inferior profile to CD20. I don't think anyone believes that they are -- that BTKs in relapsing forms of MS will be more active, more convenient, less side effects than the CD20 gives at this point.
So again, I think that's probably now a foregone conclusion, assuming that the studies in relapsing forms of MS are successful. Obviously, we've had some failures and some toxicity that's been seen along the way. So we sit and we'll wait and we'll see what the data looks like. But again, I think optimism is relatively low for these drugs and relapsing forms of MS.
On the other side, I do think that there's a lot of excitement for the potential for these drugs in progressive forms of MS. I think in theory, if they would work in progressive MS, that would be phenomenal, right? As I mentioned earlier, we're looking at azer-cel and progressive forms of MS because that is the unmet medical need. That's the area that is most concerning and is least well-treated at this point. So I think there's excitement and enthusiasm for it.
If it works -- I think there's certainly a fair amount of pessimism that it will work. But again, anytime you have an unmet medical need, people are enthusiastic about the potential. So we shall see -- again, would be a very nice thing for patients if these work in progressive forms of MS. I think in relapsing forms of MS, it's not a concern of ours.
Our next questions are from the line of Prakhar Agrawal with Cantor Fitzgerald.
Congrats on the quarter. So following up on the subcu Ocrevus uptake, based on your conversations in the field, do you expect the uptake to be similar or different between academic and community centers? And for the 1,000 or so physicians who have prescribed BRIUMVI, do you know whether the split of their IV versus subcu CD20 is similar or different than the overall market? And I had a follow up.
Yes. Adam, do you want to start on the first one?
Yes, so the first one -- Thanks for the question, Prakhar. The first one is where do we think the subcu pickup will be, right? So at this point, we can go by where [ Roche ] has guided, which is in places that don't have IV infrastructure. It's tough for us to tell exactly where this will be picked up. I don't know, and as I said earlier, we just don't detect a lot of overall enthusiasm for the product. So tough to say on that. And then you asked about what the IV versus subcu share -- could you just repeat that second part of the question? I want to make sure I get it right.
Yes. So for the 1,000 physicians who have prescribed BRIUMVI so far, what's their share of IV versus subcu CD20?
Yes Prakhar, I don't know that, but we are focused on prescribers that have significant IV share. So I don't know the exact answer to your question, but I guess that our prescribers have a higher IV share than subcu.
And just as a follow up on BRIUMVI uptake and maybe mixed by academic and community centers, if you can provide more details around the uptake by these segments and maybe which segments are seeing the most growth right now for BRIUMVI and which segments are starting to moderate?
Sure. Yes, as we've said in previous calls, we've seen the initial uptake was in the private practices as academic centers took longer from a formulary perspective and logistics. But we've seen significant growth in all segments. And particularly in the academic centers, we continue recently in the last 2 quarters to add -- to see more and more adds from a prescriber perspective within the hospital segment.
In Q2, the BRIUMVI hospital segment saw its highest ever quarter-over-quarter growth in terms of absolute vials. And now the hospital segment is the largest segment of our business today. But we're still seeing growth in both segments. And I think that's a testament to the profile of the drug and the success that we're seeing.
Our next question is from the line of Ed White with H.C. Wainwright.
So I just wanted to come back to the question on the VA contract. Adam had mentioned that it's not going to be really material in 2024. I was just wondering if you can give us your thoughts on the opportunity it represents in 2025 and beyond?
Sure. Thanks for the question. Yes, I mean what we said was this is a -- the contract is for new patients. And that will grow over time. I think the contract overall value was estimated about $187 million for the 5-year contract. I think we'll see. I think we're determined to try to get every new patient that is available, and we'll continue to see how that will grow over time.
We don't think -- Compared to our overall business, we don't think it's a huge percentage. But as I mentioned, the value there is -- there are a lot of physicians that are in the VA that also work in academia. Our hope is that, that will help to have a halo effect overall in the academic setting and also reinforce the overall profile of BRIUMVI and the value proposition that BRIUMVI brings.
And Adam, as the size of that business grows over the next couple of years, is there any impact to gross-to-net?
Sure. There'll be an impact to gross-to-net, for sure, given that it's public what we offered the drug at a discount. So that will affect gross-to-net. Yes.
And perhaps my last question is just on the share repurchase program. Do you have any timelines for that? When are you going to start and any expectations of how long that program will continue to get to the $100 million?
Yes. So we expect to get started soon. I think we'll be measured in how we do it. So we'll be in open market purchases, sort of like a, I think a [ 10B 51 ] style of plan. And there is no fixed duration of time in which we will spend the $100 million in the repurchase. And some of it we'll probably build in some share price targets so we can buy more at different levels.
So yes, I think we're going to just think about it and try to buy back as many shares as we can with the money we have for the moment. Obviously, we expect that over time we'll get to reload and buy more shares, so as the revenues and cash flow continues. So I think for the moment we're going to just start the buying as soon as we can and we'll see how it goes.
Our final question is from the line of Corinne Jenkins with Goldman Sachs.
This is Palak [ on ] for Corinne. Just one question for us here. You touched upon seasonality for the business into the second half of the year, but could you also highlight where you see room for potential upside to your revenue guidance?
Adam, can you take that one?
Yes, for sure. Yes, seasonality was -- as I mentioned, was limited to Q3. As I mentioned, that is -- historically affects the entire MS market and probably disproportionately affects IV therapies just given vacation and so on and so forth.
As we've noted also, we've raised the full year guidance for the year, which shows that we're confident in the overall growth story here. And I think upside would be continued growth and pick up both on the new patient side and as patients come back, we're going to start seeing the repeat prescriptions continue to grow as new patients continue to grow. And if that grows faster than we would expect, I think there's certainly potential upside.
We've reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the call over to Mike Weiss for closing remarks.
Great. Thank you, and thanks, everyone, again for joining us on today's call. We look forward to continuing the positive momentum into the second half of 2024. And as discussed today, we'll continue to be focused on several key priorities. First, expanding BRIUMVI's reach to ensure all eligible patients can benefit from this innovative medicine. That includes building out our commercial footprint and increasing our spending on marketing efforts. Next, advancing our BRIUMVI expansion initiatives through our subcutaneous development, our ENHANCE switch study and exploring new indications for BRIUMVI. Finally, commencing our Phase I for azer-cel and progressive MS, as well as looking at opportunities to expand our pipeline.
With that, I'd like to close by thanking the patients and clinicians that put their trust in TG and BRIUMVI and our loyal shareholders for their support and once again, the whole TG team for making it happen. Have a nice day.
This will conclude today's conference. Let me disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.