Plug Power Inc
NASDAQ:PLUG
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
1.61
4.8
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Plug Power Inc
Earnings Call Analysis
Q4-2023 Analysis
Plug Power Inc
The company has initiated a significant restructuring plan aimed at unlocking $75 million in savings, reflecting a commitment to operational excellence and fiscal discipline. This move, along with a reevaluation of pricing strategies to better reflect the company's value proposition, is expected to lead to marked improvements in financial health. Improved gross margins and reduced cash outflows, backed by a decrease in working capital, are set to lay the foundation for ongoing innovation and leadership in the renewable energy sector.
The company reported fourth quarter sales of $222 million, which exceeded the previously provided guidance from January. This performance demonstrates the company's ability to navigate market expectations effectively.
Looking forward, the company anticipates an overall growth year-over-year. However, this growth is expected to be more tempered compared to previous years due to various factors, such as price increases and a strategic shift away from PPA sale leaseback transactions. Despite this, the company's diversified strategies and operational adjustments indicate a cautious optimism for the year ahead.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Hello, and welcome to the Plug Power Fourth Quarter 2023 and Year-End Earnings Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Merrill [indiscernible] Marketing and Communications Manager for Plug Power. Please go ahead, Merrill.
Thank you. Welcome to the Plug Power Q4 Year-end Earnings Call. This will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, among others, statements of expectations, beliefs, future plans and strategies, anticipated results from operations and developments and other matters that are not historical facts. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We believe that it's important to communicate our future expectations to investors. However, investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements, and such statements should not be read or understood as a guarantee of future performance or results.
Such statements are based upon the current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections as well as the current beliefs and assumptions of management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed as a result of various factors, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, and other reports we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
These forward-looking statements speak only update in which statements are made, and we do not undertake or intend to update any forward-looking statements after this call or as a result of new information. At this point, I'd like to turn the call over to Plug Power's CEO, Andy Marsh.
Thank you, Merrill, and thank you, everyone, for joining today's call. On January 24, Paul and I provided an overview of Plug Power's results and achievements from the past year. A highlight was the launch of our Georgia plant, making us a leader in the PEM electrolyzer space and the world's foremost producer of liquid green hydrogen.
This achievement signifies a leap forward for the hydrogen industry, placing Plug Power at the Vanguard green hydrogen production and challenging the status quo. Our ambitions continues with the initiation of a joint venture with Olin at St. Gabriel, Louisiana, poised to further assert our leadership in the liquid hydrogen production world with its upcoming operation expected in the third quarter.
Additionally, the securing of a $1.6 billion term sheet from the Department of Energy is a testament to our commitment to enhancing our [indiscernible] capabilities across the United States. We expect conditional approval under the term sheet in the coming weeks. Financially, in the past quarter, we made important strides in improving cash management and fostering growth that bolsters cash generation, effectively addressing our going concern.
We had operational successes such as expanding our material handling footprint with giants like Walmart, Home Depot and Amazon and pioneering with a 1-megawatt electrolyzer system for on-site green hydrogen generation at an Amazon facility. Our launch of innovative platforms and products, including a high-power stationary fuel cell system and a 100-megawatt electrolyzer project for GAAP underscores our relentless pursuit of innovation and leadership in the green energy sphere.
These efforts reflect our strategic intent to augment our product suite and enlarge our market footprint. So many are role and spearheading a more sustainable energy future. As we move into 2024, our focus sharpens on fortifying our financial foundation and sustaining continued expansion. Our resolve to propel the hydrogen economy is matched by our strategic shift towards capitalizing on existing investment and a cautious approach to cash management. Setting the stage for persistent growth and innovation.
Cornerstone on this year's strategic direction is a significant restructuring aim in unlocking $75 million in savings demonstrating our commitment to operational excellence and fiscal discipline. Additionally, we've reevaluated our pricing to ensure it mirrors the unparalleled value of our innovative offering. Looking ahead, investors can expect to see a marked improvement in our financial health, highlighted by improved gross margins and reduced cash outflows supported by a decrease in working capital. These initiatives are critical for navigating financial complexity and laying down the groundwork for continuous innovation and leadership in the renewable energy sector.
Promising a clear trajectory for value creation and sustainable growth in the dynamic hydrogen economy. Now let me turn the discussion over to Paul for financial insights.
Good morning, everybody. As I shared back in January in the business update, 2023 was another substantial year for Plug Power, and there were many positives. Focusing specifically on the 10-K filing last night, there are a few highlights I would point out. Based on our actions in the last few months, we have addressed the going concern issue. As we finalized the accounting for the fourth quarter, sales for the fourth quarter came in at $222 million, which was slightly higher than the guidance we had provided back in January.
Regarding the material weakness issues identified in our 2022 filing based on the efforts in 2023, we have resolved the issues that were outstanding, and this reflects a substantial improvement in our key operations and processes. We have 2 new specific issues in '23 that relate to new business dynamics, but these are much more narrow issues, and we feel confident we can resolve these in the coming months. There are many challenges in 2023 as well and some of these certainly impacted our Q4 2023 results.
The chaos in the hydrogen fuel market in '23 with an unprecedented number of industry fuel facility shutdowns culminated in the third quarter and has since abated but defects continued into the fourth quarter. Our own hydrogen plant scale-up effort has taken longer than planned and given our continued application growth and the new demand from these application sales -- it has made the industry shortage and the new facility delays more of a pressing issues.
Doing big new things generally often is harder than you plan, and often -- and our new product platforms like the 5-megawatt electrolyzer system or high-power Stationery have held true to this, which in turn, pushed some of the sales into 2024 and has delayed some of the cost down activities associated with these new platforms. Some of the IRA guidance on varied provisions in 2023 were favorable to Plug. The recent guidance on PTC and manufacturing credits were not as favorable as hoped. We are active in the treasury comment process and continue to advocate for final rules that will be more appropriate for the industry.
And lastly, as we said last time, the overall economy and political factors like the interest rate hikes have not exactly made it easier to find debt capital efficiently. Given these factors, as we discussed in the January business update call, we've decided to make certain decisions to posture for better cash position in [indiscernible] revenue. As an example, instead of our normal PPA sale leasebacks for which we get revenue, but must restrict a lot of the cash. We held many of those programs in Q4 that were underway in lieu of completing the standard sale-leaseback transaction and commenced the program under the new IRA transferability rules, which we believe will allow us to sell the ITC benefits in 2024.
We've also slowed new pilot programs for new platforms given they generally consume more cash in the initial phases. These are business decisions that will guide our near-term focus as well. During the fourth quarter, we had one of our significant traditional PPA customers move to a direct sales approach, and they purchased 7 sites. However, given the fuel issues previously mentioned, they pushed the deployment into '24.
Also, as I mentioned, we purposely held off on traditional PPA sales leaseback transactions in the fourth quarter for other customers, which resulted in lower sales than historically. And on our 1 and 5-megawatt electrolyzer platforms, these are new designs, new offerings that have taken time to scale. Many new programs were shipped in Q4, but just did not get to final commissioning, hence, the respective sales were pushed into '24.
As a net impact from overall lower sales than originally anticipated, this resulted in lower volumes and in turn, lower fixed cost absorption. This, coupled with continued new product investments and certain inventory valuation charges as we continue to shape the business model and market approach overall resulted in lower gross margins than originally anticipated for the fourth quarter.
The inventory provision for noncash charges, and we remain focused on how to monetize and maximize the leverage of these assets. But given the dynamics, it was prudent to report these valuation adjustments. And the last comment I would make is that given the softening of the capital markets and our stock price, it led us to do a more in-depth evaluation of goodwill we had on our balance sheet.
As a result, we reported a noncash impairment charge for the goodwill of $250 million. Turning our focus to '24. We know we must significantly improve margin and cash flow, and we see this as an opportunity to reset. We are pursuing significant price increases across all offerings, equipment, service and fuel. We've implemented a reduction in workforce and a hiring freeze, which will lower payroll costs. We are consolidating facilities and streamlining processes.
We're reducing spend on non personnel costs. We've invested significantly in inventory in 2023 to support the ongoing growth, and this means we have much of the material we need for '24 on hand. And so our focus now is to optimize and significantly reduce the inventory investment. We're making certain focused commercial decisions such as pushing traditional PPA customers to direct sales models versus our past practice where we subscribe the solution. We're managing the timing of deployments in certain new platforms with enhanced focus on cash and profitability.
We'll continue the nurturing effort on these platforms, but focus on escalating the cost curves before we ramp sales efforts. Now that we've commissioned the new hydrogen facilities in Georgia and Tennessee, we will use these plans to drive margin improvement and fuel costs. Costs at these facilities is expected to be 1/3 of the market cost without any ITC or PTC benefits. And we've slowed investment in the follow-on hydrogen facilities in Texas and New York until we find the right financing solution.
In 2024, we are targeting to reduce the cash burn by over 70% from 2023 with lower CapEx and a reduction in investment in working capital and improved margins. We're also targeting to leverage these improvements to achieve a positive cash flow rate in the next 12 months. Raising prices, slowing new product scaling and pushing traditional PPA market customers to direct sales models collectively will mean a lower revenue growth rate in the near term compared to our prior history we think this paradigm shift is critical and necessary given the market conditions.
And equally important, it will substantially improve the foundation for which Plug will be able to grow more rapidly and profitably in the years to come. We feel confident about these strategic decisions to adjust our near-term focus and to improve cash burn, and we are seeing benefits even in the first quarter. In addition, we filed an ATM facility, which can be used to address the accounting exercise for the going concern analysis given the liquidity available to us under the principal transaction aspect of the facility.
Our near-term capital strategy is very focused. Drive significant improvement in the cash burn by reducing CapEx, reducing inventory investment, improving margins and tempering new platform spending. Work with the DOE to secure the DOE $1.6 billion project financing facility while developing complementary follow-on project financing solutions. Leverage the ATM facility as needed as we continue to develop the very debt solutions we are evaluating and continuing to develop very debt opportunities.
The company has received and continue to receive many debt offers, but they have not been for terms that are interesting to the company. Part of this was driven from the ongoing interest rate hikes. The ATM program, coupled with the reduced cash burn efforts, puts us in a position to be more selective as we continue to developing these solutions. I'll now turn it back to Andy.
Well, thank you, everyone, and we're ready to take questions.
[Operator Instructions] Our first question today is coming from James West from Evercore ISI.
The first question, and Paul, you alluded to a lot of this in your prepared comments, but the bridge kind of debt financing we're at a point where cash has come down, and there's a lot of concerns, of course, by the market. I recognize the ATM should relieve a lot of that concern. But does -- I guess there's 2 parts to this. One, when should we think about your ability or your plans to announce some bridge type of financing here? And then two, does the ATM work? Is that the accounting-wise, does that help secure the DOE loan.
That's okay. So I guess just answering the second question first. Obviously, us solving the going concern helps not only a DOE loan, but helps other debt solutions as well. It helps in many, many ways. And so that is certainly significantly helpful. And the capacity of that facility, not to say we will use it all but it's something that we can use ongoing as we move through the year to continue to address future liquidity solutions while we chase and develop things like the DOE loan and other things.
First and foremost, our focus the last quarter was solving the going concern, which we have done. That helps tremendously with customers, vendors, other debt providers. We are still nurturing a number of different parties. We still -- even as of last week, we get term sheets and we're nurturing solutions. And so I would also say we absolutely, as I mentioned, expect a significant reduction in the burn this year. We're sitting in a good position as we start the year. We're already seeing benefits of that in the first quarter. CapEx will come down tremendously.
Inventory is a substantial asset that we can leverage and help reduce the burn in our working capital and all of those things, success we get success. And so we'll continue to -- I think we'll have a number of new solutions will keep working through the second quarter and we'll keep you posted as those things unfold. But you will absolutely see a reduction in the burn, which sets the stage for us to continue finding better and better solutions as we move forward.
Okay. Okay. Got it. And then maybe Andy or Sanjay, as you addressed the new pricing with your customers? And I know I asked you this on your last call, it was kind of early days there, and the discussions are never easy, of course. But how have they gone at this point, have -- as the pricing increases, have they been successful? Are you seeing the benefits of that? I guess, how is that all playing out in the market?
So James, as you mentioned, quoting me from the January call, it's never an easy discussion. But when we look at our customer base, we're through about half those discussions, and we've made good progress. I think you'll see the main benefits starting to flow through our financials in the second quarter. I want to point to 2 press releases from last week where we announced new deals.
Both of those deals, we were able to achieve our newer higher price structure actually after the initial negotiations with those customers. So it's never a panacea. I would also say that we have seen some support on the supply side. Our partners in the industrial gas market like [indiscernible] have been helpful in helping us resolve some of these challenges. So I think you're seeing support on the pricing side, but also some support on the supply side.
I had one of our largest suppliers tell me the success in the future of the hydrogen market really is dependent upon what Plug has done. And so there are folks who are looking to find ways to help us. And I think in the second quarter, it will become apparent.
Well, maybe following up on that, Andy. The comment period for the guidance on 45 is in here. Curious what you're hearing from that you're obviously close to particularly in New York State in West Virginia on how the guidance may change?
So James, the guidance has been there were over 29,000, 30,000 comments to the guidance. If I was going to take a step back, and point to one comment that hubs are very important to the DOE and the bid administration. And it is remarkable that all those hubs stood together and said that the guidance is given will be very, very will really slow the growth if they continue in place as they are.
I've spent time when the Hill with union leaders with one union where there were 500,000 members of the union folks from the CEOs from the nuclear power industry. And I think when we look at it, we would expect that nuclear hydro, there will be reduced restrictions on those I think you'll probably see that grandfathering, which would kill many financing options probably will be lifted. I think something will happen on time matching. That's I think a lot of folks there, the wind and solar industry has been very aggressive.
Folks on the hills will point to me to one that many of these initial announcements from treasuries have been very strict and they have loosened up and I think a perfect one is natural gas dose, right, which we're very, very restricted. I think that I think that it won't -- I think you'll see changes. And I think those changes will be positive for the industry. Not perfect but positive.
Got it. All right.
Your next question is coming from Ana Gupte from UBS.
One where one growth area where we're seeing a lot of exciting news, and I think you can have leverage and was kind of missing from the earlier comments was this entire AI-driven data centers, backup power. Obviously, you have contracts with Microsoft over there. Can you talk about how you can use your leverage your system and what you're seeing out there? To kind of attack that market and grow in this backup power market or even of the grid solutions for data centers and stuff.
So when you look at the 3 major data center operators, Plug is engaged and planning. And I'm going to call them some initial deployment and test with all. This won't be rapid during the next year or 2. But certainly, all of them because of the restrictions of diesel engines because of as you mentioned that how do you want to make sure you have continuous uptime.
And look, Plug has developed the premier product. No one's going through all the requirements to be able to operate in a data center. The big challenge and the one that we're working through is making sure how you manage hydrogen. And we really working with these customers to really use not only the product as a backup power system, but also to be able to do peak low shaving. And I think the combination of those 2 will really allow this market to grow. I don't think it's a 2024 event.
I think it could be a late 2025 event where you start seeing some deployments. It's a little level of scale. But that's -- when we -- we've spent a lot of time and we developed a rather comprehensive marketing approach with one of the leading firms and the consulting firms in the world who knows more about hydrogen than anyone else. And they have told me that this is the market that ultimately will become our dominant market. But it's going to take a bit.
Perfect, Andy. And just a quick clarification here. On multiple calls in the last 2 times, you have indicated that there are a whole bunch of unplanned outages within the hydrogen industry, which were restricting supply. Those were the headwinds to your third quarter margins. Those were also the headwinds to your fourth quarter margins but you'd also indicated that things are improving as we get into January. So should we assume that at least some of those unplanned downtimes are gone and then your own supply is ramping up. So some of those shortfalls would be better addressed as we enter 2024.
The answer to your question is yes. If you look at the network at the moment, it has been stable throughout 2024. Our increased production the rest of the network, our increased production, the RESA network has been relatively stable. And I would think -- I have not spent a minute in 2024, worrying about customers not receiving hydrogen, which is dramatically different what it was like in October, November, and in 2023.
That's very positive to hear.
Next question is coming from Craig Irwin from Plug Power.
And I'm from Ross MKM.
I thought I hired you, Craig?
We've been friends a long time, Andy, but no.
I don't know how to take that, Craig.
Let's stay friends. So Andy, there's obviously a really intense amount of interest out there about your ability to take your third-party hydrogen procurement cost and make that a customer costs, a direct customer cost while you bring online green hydrogen, which is obviously a much more compelling product to our customers and to Plug Power. So can you maybe give us a little bit more color on the underlying mix of contracts, you said you've started roughly half the conversations.
What's the average duration of the contracts that governs the pricing for your hydrogen supply agreements with these third-party customers? And are these -- do these come up annually, do they come up typically on a mix every 3 years how much flexibility do you have in there from the contractual position we have with people. And if we estimate simplistically that there was a burn of a couple of hundred million last year from these underwater contracts.
Do you get through half of it? Do we see that half of that burn eliminated? I mean, how should we look at it?
Craig, I'm going to turn that over to Sanjay. But I'll just add that there's been a recognition, and I mentioned this in my remarks, with some of our long-term industrial gas partners like Linde who have been helpful. And I'll let Sanjay go into more detail here on how we see this playing out during the next 12 to 18 months. Sanjay?
Great. Thanks, Andy. So a couple of comments here, correct first, right? And I think let me just echo what Andy just mentioned here. There's been a lot of very constructive collaboration our hydrogen third-party suppliers. And when you think about our contracting structure with them, there are several -- actually, as it stands today, there are several contracts that actually comes to an end by '26. There are several that comes to -- and if you actually take that into consideration.
Some in this year.
Exactly, right? So and Craig, when you think about then our internal production that is going to be up and running by the end of the third quarter, including the Olin JV that actually covers as much as 85%. Now having said that, our plan here is to continue to work with some of our industrial gas partners. Make sure the pricing has improved, pricing is right, collaborate with also our customers. So it's almost like a 3-way type of a situation where -- we're trying to get that passed on to the customer. We're trying to get better pricing from our industrial gas customer and then you blend in our lower cost production from Georgia, from Tennessee, from Louisiana but I think as you really go through the second half of this year and Q4 of this year, you will see a step change in our fuel cost and the overall margin profile driven by better pricing that Andy talked about, driven by potentially lower cost coming from our third-party supplier and add on top of that our lower cost of production coming from our own internal facility, I think you will really see a step change as you think about Q3 and Q4 of this year from our fuel margin and cash burn associated with that business.
Excellent. Excellent. So that's a large piece of the equation that I really wanted to discuss, right? So last call, you mentioned that you have plans in place for a 70% reduction in cash needs. In '24 versus what you saw in 2023. Obviously, rightsizing the hydrogen pricing, bringing online green hydrogen is an important piece of that. Can you maybe give us a little bit more color as far as working capital and how that contributes and then the relative contribution from price increases and the -- I know it's painful, but the headcount reductions that you've put in place?
Paul, do you want to take that one?
Yes. And I think there's a couple of big numbers that make it directionally a little bit more easy to follow the math. If you look at last year of north of $650 million. This year, we're cutting that number. Right now, the tentative plan is $250 million. We're trying to even get that down. So that's a pretty substantial reduction in itself. And then if you look at inventory, last year, we grew it by roughly $400 million.
Obviously, we're not going to do that this year, so that's a $400 million improvement on its own. In addition to that, we actually think we can reduce inventory. So that will be a working capital positive. So it could be $200 million or $300 million additional. So that -- call it, $700 million plus that's $1.1 billion just those 2 events alone. So obviously, we expect the results to get better. The things like price increases, the cost reduction that Andy mentioned, the facility consolidations that we're working on and some of the streamlining of the processes.
That will help the operating burn as well. The fuel dynamics getting better on the industry availability in our own facilities. But the biggest contributor really come from that CapEx reduction and the inventory leverage. And so those will be tremendous. And we -- as I mentioned, we're already seeing benefits of that in Q1, and we'll see it really grow very quickly as we move into the following quarters.
Okay. Excellent. Excellent. And then there's been some very active conversation about the out there about the requirements for Nipa environmental compliance on the hydrogen plants that you're building I know these are embedded pieces of the DOE loan process. But can you maybe update everyone on the overall loan process and how EPs included for qualification of sites to receive funding.
So I'm going to turn it over to Sanjay. As I mentioned in my opening remarks, Craig, we expect conditional approval by the end of this month, if not sooner. But Sanjay, you want to talk about the deeper prop?
So Craig, I think the most -- the one that we're really very much focused on right now is our project in Texas, right? And one of the incremental benefit that we have there is we have done a lot of work with the developer that we worked with getting that project to where it is right now. And there's a lot of work that was done in the past that we can leverage. And obviously, we're looking to actually get that process restarted here, which is a key, as you rightfully pointed out in terms of the loan guarantee program getting that environmental permit done.
We have a team that is exclusively focused on that. And you've heard us say this before, right, that actually, especially in case of Texas, we believe that is going to be a relatively faster process versus your standard terms that you hear about a multiyear process of getting the Nipa approval done. We actually believe that, that process is something that we should be able to wrap up here in Q2, certainly by the end of Q2, leveraging all the work that has been done given the timing of where we are with the loan guarantee program, timing of when we think we can get the [ NEPA ] done, we feel very good about really being able to collaborate with the Department of Energy, especially on a landmark project like Texas, where you are using wind power, right, or using it's going to be one of the largest liquid green hydrogen plant that actually matches everything that we're talking about in terms of additionality to all the renewable energy credits to the PPA, we have in place from the wind energy perspective.
It's going to be our 120-megawatt electrolyzer plus 45 tons [indiscernible] and the first green hydrogen plant that probably has a lump sum turnkey EPC contract. So that's how we feel about it, Craig, and we feel pretty good about where we are with that process, what needs to be done really leveraging all the work that has been done in the past, and that's really our primary focus right now.
Excellent. And then this is a question that I'm not sure you can answer, but I'm going to try for it anyway. It's top of mind for a lot of people, right? So this DOE loan can fund up to 80% of the project's cost -- can you maybe give us color or some sort of understanding as far as how close to this 80% number, do you think is rational for you to receive as far as total project costs and then there's conversation out there, not just about retroactive spending, but about scope maybe being slightly wider that some of the expenses that have been incurred as far as the development costs and other associated projects might also see funding eligibility and some of these other loan packages.
Is that a potential opportunity for Plug as you look to finalize terms with the Department of mentorship.
So Craig, I'm going to let Paul take the first half and let Sanjay take some of the second half here.
Yes. I guess I'm very confident and optimistic. And the reason why is because we've worked extensively with the DOE in the last -- really, the last 1.5 years. And we've looked at projects we've deployed. We've looked at projects that we're working on. We've used those as proxies to understand what we're doing and how we're doing it, and they serve as good baselines to really have gotten to the point we're at with structuring it the way we have and thinking about how this will work.
And so I feel very good about that coming to fruition and being able to utilize the full 80%. And the understanding that we have with the DOE of how these programs work and while the costs are sourced and how it applies. And so I feel really good about that. and, I don't know if you?
Yes. And I think, Paul, you kind of captured it. Craig, I think, look, we're obviously going through final details here, and as you rightfully pointed out, probably don't want to get into too much more detail. But having said that, there has been -- there's quite a bit of capital that spend to get the project where it is right now. So I think we feel pretty good about our position of how much money has been spent, whether it's on development effort, whether it's on all the big procurement items that actually goes in getting this project built, right?
So that scenario could unfold. As you -- as we pointed out here, given that we're having all this in-depth discussion at this point in time. I think getting into too much more detail than that at this point in time is probably not something we would want to do but understand your logic, get your point where you're coming from. And a lot of the money has been spent from our equity contribution perspective for that project in Texas, and we feel pretty good about our position there.
Congrats on the progress here.
Your next question is coming from Bill Peterson from JPMorgan.
So if we think about 2024 revenue growth in the context of a focus on cash preservation, improving your equipment margins, service margins and so forth. Typically, you guys have discussed sort of a 1/3 first half, second -- third, second half -- but again, thinking about the cost reduction efforts, pushing pricing, shifting away from PPAs, some business from '23 shifting to '24. How should we think about the revenue trajectories through the year, starting with the first quarter that's more than halfway through now?
And then if you can kind of discuss at a higher level, like the breakouts in the larger buckets, materials handling, electrolyzers, which presumably be back-half weighted, especially you might have more -- maybe more certainly around the IRA and so forth. But anything for the -- how to think about the revenue growth this year and trajectory would be helpful.
Bill, I'm going to let Paul take that one.
Yes. I think both in terms of normal seasonality with material handling as well as the scaling of even follow-on and new projects those factors will still keep us in that kind of the 1/3, 2/3 scenario in terms of the revenue for the year. We do expect overall, a growth year-over-year. It will probably slightly tempered from years past just given some of those dynamics of price increases and not doing the PPA sale leaseback transactions and others.
So I think -- but I think for the overall in terms of the first half and second half, I think using traditional trends and percentages is probably good proxies I think overall, in terms of the sales mix, I'll talk at a more higher level. I mean I think the energy technology sets into the business, the whole swath of all of those things probably be 60% of our sales, somewhere in that range. And I think that's a strong statement showing how that business is really ramping and growing.
And I hope we're being conservative on the application side because we do see a lot of opportunities. And as Andy mentioned, even the programs that we've announced in the last week, I think, are fantastic signals of what our opportunities are there. And those are substantial markets. And we're seeing still a lot of interest and excitement there.
So hopefully, we're being conservative, but I think as we said today, those are probably the proxies that I would give you to guide some of your thoughts on how that will play.
Okay. And just as a snapshot, it's nice to see that George is up and running at Tennessee, but what is the average output per day? I believe you talked about achieving 15 tons per day out of Georgia. But just trying to get a sense for how the operations are running and what the trajectory looks like looking at?
So Bill, we're fine-tuning. We produced 11 tons of the 15 out of Georgia, Tennessee, is almost back to full production at 10, 11 tons per day. I expect by mid second quarter, we'll be putting out all 15 tons out of Georgia.
Okay. And just one final just sort of housekeeping. last January update, you talked about your current near-term unrestricted cash of around -- above $100 million. What is -- what is the near-term cash position today if you're able to say? Go ahead.
Yes. I mean it's probably north of 300 something in that range, plus or minus. I mean it's we're the first couple of months are very encouraging in terms of what we've seen in [indiscernible] and that's been. And we're still -- we're laser-focused on narrowing CapEx even further and deferring when we can and doing all the things that we talked about to drive that down. So.
Next question is coming from George Gianarikas from Canaccord Genuity.
So I have sort of an existential question. As you recover in 2024 and digest some of the new rules from treasury what sort of focus should we expect from Plug Power long term? Which areas of the hydrogen market or geographies probably offer the best returns on capital as we focus beyond 2024.
That's actually a good question, George. And I think that -- I think what you'll see is that during the -- and this is actually we spent -- we have been spending a lot of time on this issue. I think through this decade that the energy business with electrolyzers as well as generation of hydrogen will probably represent 2/3 of our revenue during the rest of this decade.
What we believe is that come 2030, what you're going to see is accelerated growth in our application business, especially our stationary products. And not to go way out there, George, but you said to me existential. I think by 2 -- by 32, 33, applications will start probably dominating again as more and more hydrogen is readily available. I think during the next 2 to 3 years on the energy sector, our Europe will actually dominate our electrolyzer sales -- and then ultimately, I think that on that energy sector, the U.S. and Europe will start balancing more out.
And that would be kind of what our internal view is as we look out through 35. But obviously, our crystal ball is much better for '24 '25. So it's the energy sector it's your for electrolyzers. It's the U.S. for applications. Hope that helps.
And maybe as a follow-up, you announced, I think, about 1.5 weeks ago, a contract to support a major U.S. auto OEM in material handling. Curious as to whether you can share any more detail. I think you mentioned the first quarter of 25% that will be operational. Any additional detail?
It's a new customer. It's a U.S.-based customer. It's -- when we look at it, is a perfect opportunity because it's a campus, which will include their suppliers, which also will be using hydrogen-based products, which will allow us to continue to grow. I hope during the coming quarters, we'll be able to tell you more, but it's a big deal. I think that there's almost a dozen hydrogen fueling stations inside the building.
And this is pretty typical how new buildings come up. George if I think about BMW in Spartanburg, where we started with about 75 products and you'll have initial run of those products and testing during the end. In this case, at this project at the end of the year, which duplicates what we've seen elsewhere with new auto facilities, and then it could rapidly grow at BMW, for example, I think we have over 600 fuel cells today.
So I think what you'll see is this campus will continue to grow and I think will become bigger than BMW ultimately because of all the supplier base integrated there.
Your next question is coming from Skye Landon from Redburn.
Andy. In the base case, my first question is the 70% cash burn reduction guidance, does this assume any CapEx for new hydrogen projects in Texas or New York during 2024? Or are these projects now in the base case of 2025 start? And then secondly, on the outlook for the electrolyte business, when do you now expect to start seeing major projects reaching contract-ready stages? And when do you expect to see order flow coming in I mean we've got production auctions going on in Europe at the moment. Hopefully, we get some clarification on the rules in the U.S. But I'd be interested to hear your take on whether this is a first half '24 or second half '24 or 2025 timing?
I will let Sanjay take the electrolyzer first and then I'll turn it over to Paul for capital usage.
Thank you, Andy. Again, on the electrolyzer side, right, so I'm sure, a, you guys saw we announced that we actually did multiple basic engineering design package with some large customers in Europe. in 2024. We have actually done a lot of those basic engineering design package with customers throughout the world, if you would, even in 2023, right?
So when you think about our book of business or the work that we're doing within the basic engineering design package that is actually approaching almost 4 gigawatts when you really think about that. Now some of these project needs to get to FID, but we're working hand-in-hand with the customers, helping them think through the design helping them think to what's the optimal way to think about the plant build out and that's where having built Georgia, having had 40-megawatt and the world's largest prime electrolyzer in the Western Hemisphere actually goes a long way support customers in terms of thinking through that basic engineering design package as well.
Now when it comes to the revenue, for 2024, we actually have a pretty robust backlog when you think about it, right? We have a lot of 5-megawatt projects already in the backlog. We also do have some large projects that we're already executing that's in the backlog. We do have one megawatt system in the backlog so 24 is really about executing, really about delivering on that existing backlog and puts us in a really good position to be able to do a few things. One, convert the inventory into cash.
This business is really going to be our cash generation in 2024 as well as drive the top line growth. Second piece, you're going to see in 2024. As we execute in this backlog, margins will not be as great in Q1. It will improve in Q2, but margins as well as cash flow will again improve in the second half of the year as you start to see costs going down as you also start to see higher price opportunity flow through that P&L.
So for 2024, it's not so much about really going and winning more business but we do feel pretty good about a lot of these projects where we have done basic engineering design package on a 100-megawatt plus project that starts to actually become concrete. There's many projects going into FID by the middle of this year. But let's be clear, right, real revenue opportunity on these large projects, whether it's in Europe, whether it's in the U.S., whether it's in Australia, that is really going to be 2025 and beyond the opportunity, giving us a fantastic base of that backlog very predictable revenue, very predictable margin.
And in the near term, even to support growth in 2025, we're also very focused on our 5-megawatt product line both for U.S. as well as for Europe, and that's where you will still see new book of business materialize for us. Supporting that growth in 2025. Again, we feel very good about cash generation, strong visibility. This year is really about executing on this existing backlog for us to give us a robust performance in the electrolyzer business in 2024. Paul?
Yes. And I guess a couple of things. One, on the hydrogen investments not in the current plan. is predominantly the retention and finalization of the Georgia plant that we've completed. It's the funding for the Louisiana program we have with Olin that we're developing and building and rolling out and it's kind of residual projects that we had opened at the end of last year that we're paying now for given extended term on some of the vendor program. On Texas and New York, we already had spent a lot of money.
We've kind of retailed and tempered that in the near term until we turn on the right financing solutions. But given the money that we've spent, it puts us in a good position that as we launch those the new solution that we launched would fund the majority, if not all of that incremental spend. So as we turn that on in the second half or into next year, we expect the majority of that to be covered with new financing.
I mean we do have already, for example, in stock, things like the rectifiers, Paul, as well as the -- much of the electrolyzer, many of the electrolyzers as well as the fact that liquefiers [indiscernible] Have to file storage equipment.
Yes, there's a lot of things we already have.
I think it's jumping ahead of you, Kevin, go ahead.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question is coming from Eric Stine from Craig Hallum.
I'll just stick with one here towards the end of the call. So for 24, I can appreciate not guiding given the focus more on the cash side and the expense side. But just curious, longer term, when you balance that versus so many commercial opportunities, what's going on with green hydrogen, when do you think that what year? Is it 25?
Is it in when you get back on that more traditional growth path, the one you've been on for several years growing at a pretty rapid clip.
I'm going to let Paul take that, Eric. But I think Paul in his remarks, we didn't expect zero growth this year. That was part of Paul's remarks. And I think if I was going to separate it out the energy business, we expect to grow healthy this year. There's always certain risk and timing on the project deployments. In the application business, I would expect that come '25 as we have focused on getting our costs in line this year, but I would expect 25, and I'm going to let Paul and I think he probably made reference to it in his comments, we would expect that things get looking back to traditional performance.
But this year, I think in my opening comments, I really made it clear we are looking to continue to expand and grow this business, but at better pricing and better margins. Paul, do you want to add?
Yes, I think everything you say is one thing I would add is that we don't want to overpromise anything this year, but I certainly hope and believe that there's lots of upside opportunities. So as we work through the year and on position ourselves for 2 we think there's definitely a chance that can -- even though we're kind of tempering incremental growth, we think there's upside and certainly posturing towards even better growth as we move into '25.
So Eric, if I think about the electrolyzer business, nobody has a facility like we have. When you look about the ability to build plants, and I think that Sanjay can tell you for folks that we've been doing the design with our talent in the Netherlands who have been deeply involved in this activity really is well respected. And so I believe we've made the investments in the infrastructure to support large-scale buildouts. And that really puts us in a unique strategic position. versus the competition out there.
Next question is coming from Jordan Levy from Truth Securities.
I appreciate all the details. Maybe just to go back to kind of that last comment on the electrolyzer side, I recognize you've kind of built up the scale for the long term here and it makes a lot of sense. But I'm just curious, as we think about going through this year, how do you -- and maybe this is for Sanjay, how do you think about optimizing volumes coming out of that plant while you're trying to reduce inventories and sort of what is the right run rate at this point in time to balance that equation.
Great question. That's something we've been spending, obviously, a lot of time thinking through it, right? So this year, again, it's really about executing on and there is a lot of inventory already in-house, right? We're going to make sure that we use through that. So this is really a focus on -- just to think about it, right? There's we have quite a bit of 5-megawatt product that's already in the backlog, as I said.
We have quite a bit of one megawatt product that's already in the backlog. And with some of the strategic partners, we also do some strategic stack sales, right? So when you really think about it, this year is not about optimizing the capacity utilization or the labor overhead per se. It's really more about using what we've already bought. All the procurement that has been made to execute on these projects, right?
So the way you should think about it is Q1 is going to start out somewhat similar to what the Q4 was like. But I think you'll see a step change in that revenue as you go into Q3 and Q4. Number one, you will see cash generation out of this business in every single one of these quarters because we are burning to the existing inventory. And then you will actually see a step change, not just in the revenue but also in the margin as you start to go into the second half of the year, as the cost comes down as we work on this new stack design that actually also allows us to lower the cost of that stack that will start helping in Q3 then cash generation with the improved margin profile, we'll see a step change in Q3, another step change in Q4 as well for this year.
So it's not about really needing to find more opportunity for electrolyzer business in 2024. It's really about working hand-in-hand with customers, making sure that we go from what we refer to as the factory acceptance test when the unit goes to the site then you got to do the site acceptance test and we've actually been having a lot of wonderful collaboration with a lot of different customers. In some cases, things have been challenging.
We're learning together, but I think we've come a long way here, which I think puts us in a pretty good position to deliver what is going to be a great cash generation and a really changing margin trajectory as you go through the year in this business. That is not to say that we're not going to do -- continue to do new bookings. You will see new bookings come in on our 5-megawatt product line, both for U.S. as well as Europe that will support growth in 2025.
And then just think about the opportunity that we have with this basic engineering design package approaching 4 gigawatts, that really puts us in a position where not this 25%, but we're looking at very good backlog build going into 2016 and beyond is was making this a very stable, predictable, high margin as well as the cash-generating business for us.
That's really helpful. Appreciate that. And then maybe just as a quick follow-up, not to belabor the timing on the DOE here, and I know there's only so much you guys can say, but I'm just trying to get a sense of kind of at this point in the cycle with the term sheet and all of that. Is the ball sort of in the DOE's court at this point? Or are you still at a point where you're in constant communication back and forth with them. I'm just curious to get where we are in the process.
So as I mentioned in my comments, we do expect -- this is March, and we do expect conditional approval by the end of this month. There will be negotiations then. And I think our view is that by the end of the third quarter, it should be written and we should be finalize.
Next question today is coming from Sherif Elmaghrabi from BTIG.
Andy. So I guess a bit of a nuanced question, but I noticed the average price for fuel cell was significantly higher in Q4. So my question is, are we already seeing an impact from pricing efforts? Or is that still more of a '24 story? And this quarter may have just been a mix shift to bigger fuel cells?
Yes. In Q4, it was probably more mix. We tend to sell a lot more Class 1s in Q4 often. So that helps in terms of the overall pricing structure. But I think as you look at '24 is when you'll see more of that impact and probably more so in Q2, as Andy alluded to.
Okay. Got it. That's helpful color.
Next question is coming from Amit Dayal from H.C. Wainwright.
Andy. Just one quick one from me on the DOE loan, right? So given the focus on the operational and margin improvements versus aggressive sales growth for 2. And based on just your comments a little bit earlier, should we assume that the 2024 execution plan is not really dependent on this coming through for you in 2024 of this facility.
Just that would help basically give us a sense of what the cash needs just overall for the business that you can support with available resources?
Yes. So Amit, operationally, we're not dependent upon the DOE loan for '24. We will, once the DOE loans finalize, move ahead more aggressively, especially in our Texas activity and that because we've already made significant investments in Texas, we see opportunities to even have some capital coming from the DOE to support that activity.
So we look at it -- a lot of the -- when you think about 80/20, we feel a good deal, for example, in Texas, we've already made the capital investments.
Your next question is coming from Ameet Thakkar from BMO Capital Markets.
For all the detail on I guess just from a starting point, what sort of kind of revenue in '24 in gross margin in '24? Is that from this time?
Go ahead, Paul.
We haven't really given specific numbers, I guess, to be candid with you. I think what we've alluded to is that we definitely expect growth of three, you'll see -- you'll definitely see growth off the revenue numbers. And obviously, we're anticipating a pretty significant improvement on the margin front. So that's where we stand.
Okay. And then since we're kind of waiting on the DOE to move forward with Texas and New York, I guess, is there any kind of impact to your of fuel margins in '24 from any off-takers that won't be getting fuel from those plants?
No. I'll let Sanjay take that. But no not in the plan.
No. I mean we don't have any of that impact is level in 204.
But there are offtakers there from both those plants?
Yes. Again, I think the way we've been focused on, right? Like, for example, I think this was a question we used to get a lot. How many offtakers do you guys have in Georgia, and we've always said for the reason to build Georgia was for us to really help the North American network. Second, really lower the cost more than really trying to optimize the price, right? So that's always been our focus. But when we think about our plant in Texas and New York, there's a lot of discussion in the plant in Texas, there was some offtake, right, but that doesn't kick in 2024, which is why you should actually see no impact whatsoever from that.
Next question is coming from Dushyant Ailani from Jefferies.
I just had one quick question on the lateralize tax on the cost cutting that you guys mentioned. Maybe just walk us through that a little bit?
Yes. So it's -- we mentioned cost cuts. It's really manufacturing process changes to allow the stack to be produced in a much simpler fashion. So I think if you've done a tour a facility it actually helps increase it time for manufacturing the stack and it's really -- it's not dependent upon suppliers and it's dependent upon on process improvements.
That we've made, which really simplifies the stack and had some really dramatic cost reductions on the level of materials we require and the assembly technique.
Our next question is coming from Andrew Percoco from Morgan Stanley.
Great. Well, just maybe start with a housekeeping item. Product gross margins in the fourth quarter came down quite a bit. Was there any noncash impact embedded in that number in the fourth quarter? And then I have a follow-up after that.
Go ahead, Paul.
Yes, there was probably -- I'm going to estimate roughly $60 million or so noncash valuation adjustments. That's a GAAP basis. Obviously, we still have those assets and our intentions are to leverage them into cash in 2024. But -- so that was part of it. And then the other part was lower absorption when you have on the equipment side, when you have that dynamic that affects equipment margins.
And as we've announced, a lot of those restructuring activities actually were specifically targeted towards labor and overhead in the production activities. And so that should yield benefits as we move into '24. So that was -- I guess those are some of the key things and [indiscernible] to your question on equipment margins.
Okay. That's helpful. And then as my follow-up, and I think most of my other questions related to kind of cash flow and balance sheet dynamics have been answered. So I'll just maybe shift to a longer-term question on the PPA environment, I think, as others have already noted on the call, there's a lot of demand for clean electricity, AI data centers, other electrification efforts. And I think what you're seeing across the developer landscape is that returns are actually increasing. In some cases, PPA prices are increasing as a result.
What does that mean for your unit economics of your business beyond 2024 and 2025. I know you secure a lot of your PPAs for the plant that you're working on today. But do the unit economics of green hydrogen in the U.S. work if PPA prices don't fall from here?
Maybe Andy, I can take that.
Yes. Go ahead, Sanjay.
So Andrew, I think we're glad that we've secured the PPA pricing in Texas, as you know, right? And I think even in Georgia, given I think we have that deal with sort of the overall natural gas price market dynamics that actually -- that power pricing is playing out pretty well in our favor as well, right? So we have some other discussion where power prices are going to actually remain pretty attractive in some of the even other development effort, we still have going on. Obviously, the focus here is, as we've already talked about, what we're trying to do in '24, we're prioritizing 2 key projects here.
And then you really think about all this in the second half of 2025. Having said that, we've always said, right? As long as the power prices stay between that $30 to $40 a megawatt hour level, all in fully loaded, green hydrogen economics work and look, and I think -- and we've all been through this cyclicality of the power market, right, where the rates impacts have had impact from the levelized cost of electricity. But directionally, we believe that the power price is -- in any given year, it could go up and even year it could go down. But directionally, our view still remains that the power prices probably will continue to go down. But does it have to go down dramatically from these levels here? For the green hydrogen economics to make sense in the U.S., probably not. That's number one.
And number two, we also have been very thoughtful about really being in the right location right opportunity set as we think about some of this green hydrogen opportunity also in Europe as well, where we can leverage low-cost hydro, complementing that with low-cost renewable electric cities. So look, and if there is any relief from the inflationary environment. If anything, you will probably start to see the cost of the wind turbine also go down at some point, that should have a benefit and that hopefully is enough to offset the rise in the interest rate environment and the return hurdle that some of these developers are looking for, right?
So we really don't need the price to go down a lot. But again, our sort of working view at this point in time is when you really think another 5 years out, directionally, levelized cost of renewable electricity should still continue to go down, but certainly not at the rate that we've seen in the last 10 years.
And Andrew, I would just add that a bigger picture, I've mentioned work we've done with the leading consulting for hydrogen, and they'll tell you they expect in the U.S. at least 50% of hydrogen will be green in 2030. And as you know, in Europe, they have very, very stringent goals where I think the number is 43% by 2030 has to be green. So there are other dynamics that come into play.
Our next question is coming from Kasope Harrison from Piper Sandler.
I appreciate you getting me on the call here. So I guess my first one, you're highlighting $75 million of expected savings in 2024. And I fully appreciate that reductions are extremely difficult for the people involved. So not try to be not trying to Well, basically, what I'm asking is, why aren't you cutting something more aggressive? Why aren't you targeting something more aggressive?
Because your OpEx at this point is 42% of revenues and that's up from 22% in 2019. And so why aren't you trying to cut OpEx in half this year?
I think, Kashi, because it may look good for some folks in 2024, but it will be a huge mistake in 2028. Those same folks are critical for us to achieving the gross margin targets. Those same folks are critical for improving our customer experience. Those same folks are important to building out plants like Texas. We model this so that the company can become operational and cash flow positive in '25.
But chains off, [indiscernible] I don't think keep Belgrade businesses and business is much more than the Excel spreadsheet that you put in front of yourself.
Okay. Fair enough. And then my follow-up question, maybe a bit more mechanical in nature. Can you walk us through how the change from sale leasebacks to direct purchase works with the customers within Material Handling, I think there was a comment in the K that now the customers are dealing directly with the banks. And so I was wondering if you could just help us think through exactly how the sales process works today versus how it did prior.
So I guess, as a preface, that industry, a lot of customers like to lease their asset solutions. And so they lease their tractor trailers, they lease their forklifts, they lease their racking equipment is just the way they like to access that market. Historically, we've offered both options. We've offered customers the ability to buy the equipment and some do that and then we've offered options where we lease it to them because it's eligible for investment tax credits it becomes -- it has been a bit more challenging to monetize those benefits when we offer that leasing solution and is limited in terms of the banks and participants you can go to.
So historically, for those customers, they would subscribe to it, and we would deploy it, and then we would take that package that up and sell it to a bank and then monetize the benefits. Because where we are in the maturity curve, we've had to use a lot of the cash in those transactions to kind of back to the investment tax credit aspects and so going forward, those customers will probably still lease the solutions, but we've been pushing them towards working with the banks themselves and us being more of the middle man to facilitate that.
And I would just add that when we started early on, another dynamic was it was newer technology. So it also kind of made banks don't like new banks. They like things that have been around 100 years, and they can go to the book and open up and turn to the section for cars or drops or forklifts and there hasn't been a fuel cell section. The fact that we've been doing this for 10 years and broadly as we have, and there are so many banks that are involved now, the comfort level with the customers and the banks on this technology is substantially broader and more understood.
And so that makes it easier. And we've built a fairly big portfolio of banks that we can now work with. And so now when we put the customers to those banks, it becomes a much easier conversation for them to put those programs in place. And so that's what we're working towards is that we're no longer the middleman that we're just the facilitator and we still treat it as a CapEx sale for us, whether the customer is buying it or they're having their bank buy and lease it to them, and that's what we're pushing for.
We reach the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Andy for any further closing comments.
Thank you, Kevin, and I just want to reiterate sentence or 2 for my opening statement. As the company moves into 2024, we are focused on fortifying our financial foundation, but also sustaining continual expansion. No we are resolved to propel the hydrogen economy, but it's also matched by our strategic shift towards capitalizing on existing investments and a cautious approach to cash management. And this is -- and let me be clear, it sets the stage for persistent growth and innovation. I thank everyone for the time today and looking forward to talking to many of you over the next months. Have a good day.
Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.