Chord Energy Corp
NASDAQ:CHRD
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
123.8
187.42
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning. My name is Brian. I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the first quarter 2018 earnings release and operations update for Oasis Petroleum. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded.
I will now turn the call over to Michael Lou, Oasis Petroleum's CFO, to begin the conference. Thank you. You may begin the conference.
Thank you, Brian. Good morning, everyone. This is Michael Lou. Today, we are reporting our first quarter 2018 financial and operational results. We're delighted to have you on our call. I'm joined today by Tommy Nusz and Taylor Reid as well as other members of the team.
Please be advised that our remarks on both Oasis Petroleum and Oasis Midstream Partners, including the answers to your questions, include statements that we believe to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to be materially different from those currently disclosed in our earnings releases and conference calls.
Those risks include, among others, matters that we have described in our earnings release as well as in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
During this conference call, we will make reference to non-GAAP measures, and reconciliations to the applicable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings releases and on our websites. We will also reference our current investor presentation, which you can find on our website.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Tommy.
Good morning, and thank you for joining our call.
Oasis completed another solid quarter as we began to execute on the 2018 plan we outlined in February. We closed the Forge acquisition on February 14 and have taken over operations and continue to integrate that world-class asset into our portfolio. We're off to a great start to the year, producing 76,800 BOEs per day in the first quarter while maintaining top-tier capital efficiency, cash margins and resulting recycle ratio. We maintain our projection of being free cash flow positive on our E&P business for the year while continuing to grow volumes at 15% to 20% year-over-year.
Internally controlled infrastructure, through OMS, supported flow assurance, reduced cost and provided access to liquid marketing points. This combination resulted in reduced downtime and per barrel operating costs in spite of abnormally difficult winter conditions. We remain on pace to exceed our stated 2018 combined exit rate of 88,000 BOEs per day, and we are focusing on the second quarter ranging between 76,000 to 80,500 BOEs per day. Additionally, we've increased our full year guidance to 81,000 to 84,000 BOEs per day.
The team did a tremendous job of managing capital costs and delivering several capital efficiency gains over the quarter. Our well services business continues to drive down cost and increase frac efficiency on our Williston wells, and OWS completed about 2/3 of our wells during the quarter. Our third frac -- our third-party frac performance has been very good as well. In spite of higher oil prices, our well costs remain in line with where they entered the year. We continue to see limited cost inflation or service tightness in the Williston or in the Delaware.
We're focused on continuing to streamline operations with lower costs, and we look forward to transferring our Williston expertise to the Delaware Basin, where we can use what we've learned in the Williston to address current challenges that operators are dealing with there, especially as we plan for future full-field development, employ our detailed 2-year forward planning model.
Due to our long-term relationships that we've developed with our service partners in the Williston, Oasis has secured critical services at market-competitive prices in the Delaware. We see many service providers, both large and small, that want to partner with Oasis early on and grow with us as we ramp up operations in the Delaware.
Oasis continues to deliver great cash margins and high returns, which results in one of the highest, if not the highest, recycle ratios among our peers, as described on Page 6 of our presentation. We expect to continue to be E&P cash flow neutral to positive, as we were in the first quarter of '18, with 15% to 20% production growth through 2019 in a $55 to $60 WTI world.
With that, I'll turn the call over to Taylor.
Thanks, Tommy. It was a strong start to 2018 for Oasis as the team closed the Forge acquisition and began to integrate the asset into our portfolio. G&A was a little higher than normal due to the costs associated with the acquisition, but we expect to remain within our guidance for the year.
During the quarter, we completed one gross well with 100% working interest in the Delaware. We are currently running one rig and the second is expected to start in late May. Completion activity in the Delaware should generally be pretty consistent throughout the next couple of quarters with a little step-up in activity in the fourth quarter as we look to complete 6 to 8 wells in 2018.
In the Williston, we are primarily focused in the core and still expect to complete a total of 100 to 110 gross operated wells in 2018, with the remaining completions this year being pretty evenly spread across the remaining quarters, with the second quarter being weighted more to the back end.
We have budgeted some inflation into our full year cost estimates, and we still expect to spend between $815 million to $855 million on upstream capital expenditures, with about 85% of that capital in the Williston and about 90% of E&P capital on drilling and completions.
Keep in mind that all of our guidance on spending and production is before the impact of our divestiture program, which we hope to have a formal update on some time mid-year. Early interest in the targeted assets has been encouraging.
As far as well performance, as you can see in the presentation, our wells in the core of the Williston continue to perform in line with expectations and with our new type curves we showed in February. We've budgeted 10 million pounds of proppant for the Bakken and 4 million pounds for the Three Forks. But we will continue to optimize our frac design to further enhance our returns.
During the quarter, we have seen strong well performance in our Alger area, with our recently completed Spratley wells performing in line with our Wild Basin and Alger type curve.
As far as updates on our other core areas, as you can see in the presentation, our Indian Hills wells continue to perform above the type curve. In addition, we recently moved Painted Woods into the core due to strong performance seen by offset operators. We plan on conducting enhanced completions and spacing tests in our Painted Woods area in the second half of the year.
In the Delaware, our Wolfcamp wells continue to exceed our expectations, significantly outperforming the industry 1.2 million BOE type curve. All wells are still naturally flowing, with our Bighorn well still flowing after almost 2 years on production. We expect to continue to improve returns through the use of longer laterals and optimizing completion techniques.
On the operational cost front, the team did a tremendous job of reducing the lifting cost during the quarter, with LOE per BOE of $6.48 coming in below our guidance range on the year of $7 to $7.50 per BOE. In line of our operational success, we are changing the low end of our guidance on LOE to $6.50 per BOE, with the full year expected to be between $6.50 to $7.50 per BOE.
We also continue to realize remarkably tight oil price differentials, with our first quarter averaging -- average being $1.69 per barrel, within our guidance range of $1.50 to $2 on the year. Going forward, we continue to expect to see oil differentials within that range.
While Permian differentials are high right now, we see sufficient long-haul pipelines being built by the second half of 2019 to eliminate the gap. The increased capacity coincides with the timing of activity acceleration in our program for the Permian. For now though, 95% of our production enjoy the tight differentials we're experiencing in the Williston Basin.
To close, it is a very exciting time in Oasis. We are greatly encouraged by the start of the year as we continue to make progress on our 2018 goals and objectives.
I'll now turn the call over to Michael.
Thanks, Taylor. Thanks to the strength of our operations, we were free cash flow positive on our upstream business again this -- on the quarter. We continue to enjoy strong liquidity levels with a total borrowing base of $1.6 billion and less than half of our credit facility drawn as of March 31, 2018.
Oasis has a net debt to first quarter '18 annualized EBITDA multiple of 2.9x, with EBITDA exceeding $230 million in the first quarter. We have no significant near-term debt maturities and plan on pushing out our debt stack through the tender process we announced back in April. The tender process will be funded by our recent $400 million offering of senior notes due 2026, which priced at the tightest level Oasis has seen since going public.
Our 2018 program remains secure, given our prudent financial risk management, with approximately 70% of 2018 estimated production hedged. And we have added 2019 hedges at high oil prices, ensuring program success in spite of volatile commodity prices.
On the Midstream front, we continue to leverage Oasis Midstream Services, or OMS', ability to improve our world-class operating margins and full-field development capabilities. The OMS assets are critical to Oasis' operations, and Oasis will also benefit by OMS' ability to bring on third-party opportunities which could have a strong, positive impact on both Oasis and Oasis Midstream Partners' financial success. OMS has been successful in and continues to pursue accretive third-party projects with strong project-level returns that complement our robust Williston footprint.
As you know, gas production continues to increase in the core of the Williston Basin and is starting to push up against existing process and capacity. Additionally, North Dakota gas capture regulations are getting tighter. But our team has done a tremendous job getting in front of these requirements through forward operational planning and foresight, ensuring that Oasis has the gas capture and processing capacity to meet regulatory requirements.
We plan to use our new 200 million-a-day processing plant in Wild Basin to maintain our gas capture rates. The new plant is scheduled to come online at the end of the year and is already over 65% complete, with all major equipment set in place, running both on time and on budget, and is fully funded by OMP, with the bulk of spending being in the first 3 quarters.
Going forward, we expect to continue to be free cash flow positive on our upstream business while growing production 15% to 20% annually. Midstream capital is expected to be funded by OMP through drops to OMP over time.
Oasis is off to a great start in 2018 and remains on track to provide best-in-class capital-efficient growth.
With that, I'll turn the call back over to Brian for questions.
[Operator Instructions] And our first question today comes from Brad Heffern with RBC.
On the Delaware, I saw you guys are adding the second rig soon. And you also made the comment that your ramp in activity is going to coincide with some of the long-haul pipes coming on in the Delaware. So is the implication there that this 2-rig program is sort of what's going to be run until the middle of 2019?
So the plan is, like we said, is to add this rig in May. When you look at the amount of wells that are going to be drilled relative to the completion cadence for the year, it's 6 to 8 wells that will be completed. Quite a few more wells are going to be drilled, 15 kind of range. And then as you get into 2019, we'll continue to run 2 rigs. And somewhere in -- likely in the back half of the year, as we said, we would pick up the pace and add another rig and then have the ability to complete more wells.
Okay. Got it. And then any results you can give from the well that was placed online this quarter in the Delaware? And also, when are we going to see the first sort of Oasis location selected designs completed well results?
Yes, the one well that came online is Bone Springs well, but it's only been on for about 30 days, so it's very, very early time. We're encouraged by what we're seeing. But we're going to need 6 months plus a day to kind of form an opinion of what the wells are looking like. So you'll hear more about that one later on. Then as far as the completion techniques, we've taken what the prior operator was doing and have started to modify that. And the modifications that we've made so far have been a little bit of increase in size, so higher proppant loadings and higher fluid amounts as well. And then we're working on a number of stages in the wells, cluster spacing, a number of other things that we'll talk about as we get more into the program.
The next question today comes from Dave Kistler with Simmons Piper Jaffray.
You briefly touched on the divestiture updates, and I know with the process ongoing, it's hard to give us a lot of color commentary on it. But commodity prices had a pretty nice uplift since you first mentioned what you were looking at doing. Can you talk a little bit, just generally, about whether that might impact the size of what you sell, i.e. selling less, still garnering $500 million? Or potentially looking at an increase in the aggregate cash received if you go ahead and sell everything you'd originally targeted?
So Dave, we've talked about kind of what we're looking at. And what we talked about was all the fairway acreage in our presentation, it's about 200,000 acres, along with some of the non-op. It's about 8,000 to 10,000 barrels a day of production. And what we said at the time was that we don't think we had to sell all of it to get to that $500 million. I think that's still true. So we're going to evaluate. We've had strong interest. We're going to evaluate, and we'll figure that out. It certainly could be $500 million selling less assets or selling the same amount of assets and getting more proceeds. We don't have an answer to that. And like Taylor mentioned earlier, we'll give an update, a more formal update, call it, in the middle of the summer.
Great. I appreciate that clarification. And then maybe thinking a little bit about the commentary on an expectation of a dropdown to OMP, just trying to think about it more in terms of balance sheet and whether we should be looking at the divestiture coming first, the dropdown coming first, indifference on that front, and kind of target of what you're hoping to get to on a balance sheet perspective by year end.
Yes, good question. We've talked about dropdowns. Obviously, we've got some outspend on the infrastructure side this year that we said we're going to fund through OMP. And so I think you will see that. We don't have an exact timing on that. Obviously, we'll update you as we get along. But I'm going to guess that's going to be the back half of the year. And from a balance sheet standpoint, obviously, we'll look at divestitures along with the dropdown and we'll see where we come out. But at under 3x debt-to-EBITDA now, with EBITDA growing, naturally, we're delevering without even any divestitures or dropdown. And then those 2 things are going to, obviously, improve the balance sheet pretty significantly when those happen. But it'll obviously be dependent upon size and what we actually get done.
Okay, I appreciate that. Can I just sneak one last one in here?
Please.
So just looking at the hydrocarbon mix, obviously, gas level ticked up a little bit. You made the commentary about the 200 million processing facility coming online. How should we be thinking about that going forward? Obviously, great to have that access so it doesn't inhibit oil growth, but just so we can kind of model out mix and make sure we're heading in the right direction when we're looking at that [ 88 ] exit.
I think when we put out guidance at the beginning of the year, we were kind of thinking about 76% kind of throughout the year. So 76.4% at the beginning of the first quarter is kind of right in line with where we expected it to be. I think that 200 million a day plant, what you'll see is that we'll have some operations in Wild Basin that will come online and help fill that plant. But I think we'll kind of stay in that, call it, that 76% neighborhood. And I think that's how you should think about the exit rate, too, as kind of in that 76% neighborhood.
The next question comes from Jeoffrey Lambujon with Tudor, Pickering, Holt and Co.
First one's on the Delaware. Just wondering what the current plans are for approaching the Midstream side of the operations there. Are you looking to take out capacity on some of those systems that are scheduled to start up around that back half of '19 time frame you mentioned? And also from the gathering and water standpoint, would be great to hear what the approach is there as it stands.
Yes. So on the Midstream side, I think as we did the acquisition, I think kind of everybody saw that Midstream was going to be very tight in the basin, really, for the next, call it, 18 months until, call it, the second half of '19. So we didn't get into any big acceleration plans until really seeing that. And so we've talked about that was one of the reasons why we're drilling up in the Williston, great differentials there. We'll wait for that big pipe to come in on the crude side as well as the gas and NGL side in the second half of 2019. From a gathering perspective, there's actually a lot of opportunities there. So we're continuing to evaluate the gathering opportunities. A lot of great third parties that are out there that we'll continue to talk to. Obviously, we think there's a lot of opportunities for OMP as well. So we'll continue to evaluate that. You can look to what we did in the Williston as a way to think about things. We were, I think, very thoughtful in the Williston when we put our long-term gathering agreements in place. It got us to multiple points, very liquid markets. And because of the thoughtfulness of our marketing team, we enjoy some of the best differentials in the Williston. That's what we're looking for in the Delaware. We set up really well on that position because we're very close to the Wink, which will be the crude hub; and as well as we're very close to Waha, which is the gas hub. So you sit, location-wise from the Delaware perspective, very close to the 2 largest hubs, both on the crude side and the gas side. So feel advantaged on that side as well. And then you mentioned the long-term pipe, and as you can imagine, we are securing kind of some of that long-haul transportation, gives us a lot of comfort on differentials in the Delaware being similar to the strong differentials in the Williston, or maybe even better, on the longer-term perspective.
Great, appreciate the detail there. And then second one's on the Williston, just regarding the gas capture regulations you mentioned. I guess first, can you talk about what the main changes are that are coming over the course of the year that you're watching the closest? And then also maybe we can get a reminder of how you're positioned until that second plank comes on.
Yes. The regulations changed from 85% capture rate to 88% at the end of the year in November time frame. We're capturing kind of above 90%, and we have been for a while. And so the 200 million-a-day plant basically keeps us in a position to keep that capture rate very strong in that 90% range. The gas plant will obviously be helpful to us because we have a lot of our activity that continues to go on in Wild Basin. But we also see quite a bit of third-party opportunities for OMS/OMP in that area as well. A lot of producers active in that area, and we know processing capacity is definitely tight.
Next question comes from Mike Kelly with Seaport Global.
In the Delaware, I just wanted to get a sense if you can remind us what percentage of this acreage is held. And I wanted to get your sense on how committed you are going to a 2-rig program here in the face of these differentials potentially being stressed through maybe middle of next year.
So in terms of the program needed to hold the acreage, it's a modest program. This year, it's on the order of 1.5 rigs or so in terms of activity at current drill times. As you go forward, that steps up a little bit. So as you get to 2019, it's on the order of 2 to maybe 2.5 rigs. And then it steps up, in 2020, a little beyond that, but not a huge amount. So for us, it's really a manageable program, and it coincides with what we were talking about, that increase in activity level which really gets kind of loaded -- more back-end loaded towards 2019 and 2020. It also allows us, the way it's set up, to really optimize from a spacing and a testing standpoint, so we don't have to -- a lot of this acreage, if you'll remember, is on university lands, the majority of it. And we've got an agreement where we don't have to jump around and drill wells to hold. We can optimize that program and drill wells in the same spacing unit and satisfy drilling obligations to hold that land. So it really gives us the benefit of being able to test and go to full-field development sooner than you would be able to otherwise compared to some of the other things going on in the basin.
Got it. Appreciate that. Speaking on the Delaware, how should we think about your appetite for continued bolt-on acquisitions? And maybe if you could touch on the opportunity set for acreage swaps, trades with your neighbors here in the play.
Yes. We've got about 22,000 acres with the current position. And as you think about the amount of core inventory here with thickness of the section, as we've compared it to the Williston, with this thicker section, you can think about, for surface acreage, what you're getting is kind of 3 to 5x that we consider from a surface footprint in Williston. So we've got a big runway of core locations, over 500 with the new acreage. And we're very focused right now on continuing to core up the position. So it's really smaller deals, trades, trying to block up more of the acreage, put ourselves in a position to drill more long laterals, even though most of this is set up for long laterals at this point, and then continue to block it together. So we don't have a big need to go do a large-scale acquisition. It's really supporting this position. Now over time, yes, we'd love to continue to add to it. It's not unlike what we've done in the Williston. When you look at the Williston, we've built that position over a 7-year period. Highly focused on adding positions that really accrete to our skill set. And so we're going to do the same thing here. We're going to, over time, look for more opportunities to add chunky acreage that has high control and will allow us to get the benefits of both infrastructure and our well services business.
The next question comes from Ron Mills with Johnson Rice and Company.
Just to stick on the Delaware a little bit, good job on the infrastructure. But could you talk about access to 2 rigs, as you look go from 2 rigs -- or to 2 rigs this month and a third rig next year? And also, how you plan to fold in completion crews in terms of when would you potentially need a dedicated crew, how does OWS fit into that equation? And so forth.
As far as the rigs are concerned, fortunately, with the relationships that we've developed in Williston, a lot of the same providers are in the Permian and West Texas. And so that's really led us to ample opportunities, both on the rig and the frac crew side of the business. So picking up this, as we said, this second rig in May, a third rig next year. And we think when we get to that point, we'll be able to do that without a problem. What we've seen in terms of frac crews has actually been quite a bit of availability. We've reached an agreement on the balance of the year to do our frac work. Now we're not at a point where we've got a full schedule where we can have a dedicated crew, so we've got some spots along the way where we'll get our wells fracked. A good example is we were planning on fracking a well this quarter, but probably a little later this quarter. And we've -- with the arrangement we've reached, we're going to get a frac crew a little earlier than we originally thought, which is right now, we're fracking today. And we think we'll see the same thing with the provider that we're working with for the balance of the year. We don't expect any problem in getting the wells fracked on time. As you look forward in time, to get to the point where we can justify a dedicated frac crew is probably second half of '19 to early '20, again, that period when we're talking about ramping up. So we will -- we're actually looking at it right now and continuing to evaluate, going forward, whether it makes sense for us to bring one of our own crews into the basin. In that event, we'd probably just build an additional spread. But we -- we're under evaluation, and we've got really the rest of this year to make that decision. So we'll talk about that later in time.
And I guess kind of a corollary. Any -- relative to your original expectations in the Delaware and even on what you expected up in the Williston with the increased oil prices, are you seeing any cost inflation or much at all? If so, what are the -- what items have been more susceptible to inflation?
Ron, if you look at the well cost quarter-over-quarter, so going 4Q to '17 to 1Q were really flat, and we haven't seen increases on the big ticket items. Really, it's been fairly flat, fairly well behaved. There's a number of items that we're keeping an eye on. Steel will be one of those. Labor in the Permian is pretty tight. But really, we feel pretty good about the well cost at this point. We'll continue to track them as we go through the year and see where we end up. As we talked about in our prepared comments, we've incorporated inflation in our budgeted numbers. Fortunately haven't really seen much of that to this point. And we'll update you as we go.
Great, and one more. Since you've moved Painted Woods over to the core now in the Williston, can you just provide an updated core inventory account in -- at your current activity levels? And once you fill this Wild Basin plant, do you anticipate starting to maybe move some rigs around to other areas outside of Wild Basin, Alger, et cetera?
You're right. In terms -- you're right, we're going to move the rig into Painted Woods. We're actually drilling there and we'll complete wells in the second half in Painted Woods. But if you look on Page 4 of the presentation, you can see -- yes, you actually turn the better one for Williston is Page 10, and you can see that our core inventory incorporating Painted Woods. With that inclusion, we went from 483 to 585 net locations in the core. So nice expansion of core locations in that area. Now when you think about where the drilling activity is going to be, we're going to run rigs this year in Wild Basin, Alger, Indian Hills, and as I said, in Painted Woods, to do the pilots in Painted Woods. As the gas plant comes on at the end of the year and going into next year, we'll still have at least one rig running in Wild Basin. It's going to be 1 to 2 rigs going forward to throttle or keep the volumes where we want them for our internal volumes. The additional rigs, as you think about the 5-rig program we've been talking about, are going to be Alger, Indian Hills and then branching out into places like Painted Woods and East Red Bank.
Next question comes from Gail Nicholson with KLR Group.
I'm just looking at the oil differential. How much of the Williston volumes go to premium markets versus going to Clearbrook? And then is that something that you think that can continue to shift to the premium markets? And then have you locked in any contracts and considered maybe hedging directly to Brent?
Yes, our hedging has, to date, all been to WTI, but we're continuing to watch that in terms of where you hedge. Most of our barrels get to premium markets, and so most of them are able to get to either the East Coast or the Gulf Coast, both being at kind of that, more of that Brent-type pricing. So that's one of the reasons you're getting very strong differentials in the Williston, is that you have opportunities to get to those stronger markets overall.
And then just looking at the February presentation versus the recently released May presentation, I'm looking at that other core areas of Bakken well performance. The new presentation, that the curve is above -- the actual average cumulative production in the wells is above the type curve, versus the previous presentation, it was on the type curve. I was just wondering what the driver was there.
It's just the performance of Indian Hills wells versus that type curve over time. That's all the wells that you're seeing in that other core area is just Indian Hills at this point. And then over time, as we look at some of these other areas in the core outside of Indian Hills, Alger and Wild Basin, we'll add additional information for those areas. We just -- we hadn't been drilling outside of Wild Basin long enough to have more data with these bigger frac jobs. So we'll have more of that as we go forward.
Next question comes from David Deckelbaum with KeyBanc.
Just was looking -- not sure if you commented on this already, but the comments in the press release said you'd kind of been ahead of schedule this year so far. Considering some of the weather that you saw within the Bakken in the first quarter, where are you seeing some of the time savings or efficiency gains? And I guess you guided the rest of the year that things kind of smooth out. Are you just assuming that you kind of converge back to the original timing of your plan?
Yes. There's a couple of things, and Taylor can give you some more color, but the group did a really good job in the first quarter on managing downtime. Plus, with the infrastructure that we've got in place, we don't have to move trucks, that helps a lot. But I think it -- a lot of it was just capital well performance and reduction in downtime relative to what we had modeled or planned originally.
Yes, that's accurate. As you look at the remainder of the year, the total activity levels or wells completed in Williston for the quarter were 16. With 100 to 110 projection, if you smooth that out for the rest of the year, that's about 30 wells a quarter. And so it's a big step-up in activity. Now in terms of wells fracked, if you look at the DUCs, we actually built a DUC backlog this quarter. So we bumped it up from [ 70 ], high 70s, I think, to around [ 90 ] or so. And that's a reflection of frac activity. We're able to frac a number wells that we didn't get cleaned out during the quarter, which sets us up. With better weather now and being outside of breakup, we go from the winter weather, which slows us down a bit, and then also breakup, where you're in road ban for -- we're pretty much past that at this point. We've got a good runway of weather and conditions that we can get more of these wells online. So we expect, like we said, about 30 a quarter for the balance of the year in Williston. And then when you look in Delaware, the 6 to 8 wells, it's -- we did one well this quarter, and you're probably going to see around that for the next few quarters and then a little higher pace of activity at the end of the year.
Appreciate the color on that. And then just the last one for me is just, as you think about the program ramping in the Delaware with the second rig, how are you thinking about sort of your own spend on water handling going into '19 in the area versus the third-party services available to you, either for sourcing or for disposal?
So with the addition of a rig, we've been looking at the early time projections on production, and water is certainly one of the things that's important in the Delaware. We are -- we will add some internal disposal capacity this year. We'll be drilling an SWD well, our second operated SWD well in the not-too-distant future, likely this quarter. And we're looking at additional capacity as well. We've also got some agreements where we can offload to third parties. So we've got a couple of those, which gives us a lot of flexibility in terms of where we send the barrels. Longer term, we're really taking -- Michael talked about this earlier, we're taking a -- developing a view of what the production profile looks over the coming years. And we'll have, really, a more holistic approach for midstream services and potentially OMP to incorporate that water into our business. But this year and next year, we'll cover developing a bigger plan as we go beyond that.
At this time, this will conclude the question-and-answer session for today. I'd now like to turn the conference back over to Tommy Nusz for any closing remarks.
Thanks, Brian. And the Oasis team is off to another great start and has the resources and planning processes in place to exceed expectations in an uncertain but improving market while maintaining top-tier capital efficiency and cash margins. Thank you again for joining our call.
The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.