Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc
NASDAQ:AUPH
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
|
US |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
Machinery
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
4.81
9.49
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
US | |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US | |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Q4-2023 Analysis
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals has embarked on a strategic review, considering a wide array of options such as a sale, merger, or other transactions, with JPMorgan leading the process. Despite engaging with numerous parties and conducting in-depth presentations, only one non-binding expression of interest emerged, leading to formal due diligence. The company is refocusing on LUPKYNIS growth and expecting to achieve around $50 to $55 million in annual cost savings through restructuring, which involves halting the development of AUR 200 and AUR 300 and reducing headcount by 25% by the end of the first quarter of 2024.
Aurinia announced a share repurchase program of up to $150 million, subject to Canadian regulatory approval, showcasing its confidence in the company’s growth and commitment to enhancing value for stakeholders.
The company's cash reserves slightly decreased to $350.7 million by the end of 2023, down from $389.4 million at the end of 2022. However, total net revenue surged by 59% to $45.1 million in the fourth quarter due to the sales of LUPKYNIS to its main customers, marking significant market penetration. License, collaboration, and royalty revenue also increased to $2.8 million in the same quarter, following marketing authorization of LUPKYNIS in Europe earlier in the year.
Operating expenses grew to $74.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2023, partially driven by increased LUPKYNIS sales and the associated amortization of development costs. Additionally, selling, general, and administrative expenses rose slightly due to higher share-based compensation. Research and development expenses were also noted but not quantified in the provided excerpt.
Other expenses amounted to $9.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2023 due to foreign exchange losses, a shift from other income of $2.2 million in the same period of the previous year. However, interest income has benefited from higher interest rates year-over-year, resulting in $17 million for the full year of 2023 compared to $5.1 million in 2022.
Aurinia continues to track patient start forms, indicative of new treatments commenced with LUPKYNIS. The company is witnessing a consistent average in patient starts but sees the potential for growth and improvement in the time to conversion for patients beginning treatment. Additionally, persistency rates are showing signs of stabilization if not improvement beyond the 12 and 24-month marks, which bodes well for ongoing growth and market penetration.
Greetings, and welcome to Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Full Year 2023 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host. Andrea Christopher, Head of the Corporate Communications and Investor Relations for Arena Pharmaceuticals. Thank you. You may begin.
Thank you, operator, and thank you to everyone for joining today's call and webcast. Joining me on the call this morning are Peter Greenleaf Aurinia's Chief Executive Officer; and Joe Miller our Chief Financial Officer. Today, we will review and discuss Aurinia's 2023 4th quarter and year-end financial and operational results as well as an update on our strategic review as communicated in the company's press release issued this morning. The company also filed its annual financial statements on Form 10-K this morning. For more information, please refer to Aurinia's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and applicable Canadian securities authorities, which are also available on Aurinia's website at auriniapharma.com. During today's call, Aurinia may make forward-looking statements based on current expectations. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially. For a discussion of factors that could affect Aurinia's future financial results and business, please refer to the disclosures in Aurinia's press release and its annual report on Form 10-K and all of its recent filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Canadian securities authorities. Please note that all statements made today during today's call are current as of today, Thursday, February 15, 2024, and unless otherwise noted and are based upon information currently available to us. Except as required by law, Aurinia assumes no obligation to update any such statements. Now let me turn the call over to Aurinia's President and CEO, Peter Greenleaf. Peter?
Thanks, Andrea, and good morning, everyone. I want to thank everybody for joining us on today's call. As you may have noted, we issued preliminary unaudited fourth quarter and year-end numbers in early January. On today's call, we will provide you with the final audited results for the fourth quarter and the year-end 2023. We'll also provide an update on our commercial activities. Including key commercial metrics and significant highlights for LUPKYNIS. We will then provide an update with the company's previously announced strategic review and our business strategy moving forward. This includes our near-term plan to restructure the company and the initiation of a share repurchase program. We believe this plan allows for immediate enhancement of shareholder value and has the ability to strengthen the company's long-term financial picture. After walking you through these details, I will then turn the call over to Joe Miller, our CFO, to provide additional details on our financial results.
For the full year 2023, Aurinia achieved $175.5 million in total net revenue, which represented an increase of approximately 31% over the prior year. We achieved $158.5 million in net product revenue, representing an increase of 53% over 2022. For the fourth quarter of 2023, we achieved a total revenue of $45.1 million and a total net rep product revenue of $42.3 million which represented an increase of 59% and 49% over the same period in 2022. Moving to more detail behind our financial results. During the fourth quarter, Aurinia added 438 patient start forms or PSF, compared to 406 PSFs in the fourth quarter of 2022. And 436 in the third quarter of 2023. In addition to the 438 PSFs added in the fourth quarter, the company also added approximately 101 new additional patients. This includes restarts, defined as patients coming back on to therapy who do not require a PSF and an estimate of new patients beginning therapy in the hospital channel. The addition of patient restarts and patients coming through the hospital channel are newly reported in the fourth quarter since they've achieved a numerical significance for the first time. Hospital and restart numbers are both new indicators of growth for us. We know that restart patients have been off therapy for a considerable amount of time before restarting.
Restarts represent a strong indicator for the brand because they demonstrate that physicians are comfortable using LUPKYNIS as a first-line therapy, and they likely indicate the importance of maintaining LUPKYNIS for a sustained period of time. It's important to note that treating flares is not aligned with the most recent treatment guidelines. These guidelines out there call for patients to remain on therapy for 3 to 5 years. I'll talk more about our commercial strategy in a moment, but this is why we continue to encourage physicians to follow the guidelines and treat lupus nephritis more aggressively. Regarding our hospital numbers, we ship wallets to hospital pharmacies, with little to no visibility into how these hospitals are dispensing the drug to actual patients. Therefore, we estimate how many patients come from those wallets based on average wallet utilization across all patients. As previously discussed, the hospital market was completely closed off to us for the first 2 years of the launch due to the global pandemic. Now that we have a broader hospital access, we're looking closely at how we approach these institutions and addressing some of the complexities that are inherent in the hospital systems and integrated health care networks.
We're beginning to see the impact of our execution in this space with the wallet shipments and patients beginning to pull through. For the full year, we added a total of 1,791 PSF, an increase of approximately 9% year-over-year. And from January 1, 2024 through February 9 at the same year, we added approximately 191 PSFs. Adding to the PSF number, we have approximately 40 new patients from both restarts and the hospital channel. In addition, I'm pleased to report that our conversion rates continue to improve with approximately 85% of PSFs converted to therapy. We're also improving the time it takes to get patients on therapy. Throughout 2023, we increased our processing speed at all time periods, 30, 60 and 90 days with 63% of our patients starting therapy in 20 days or less. I'd like to point out that this is a meaningful improvement year-over-year. Our 12-month persistency continues to improve and is now approximately 55%. We are encouraged to see almost 45% of patients who remain on therapy at 18 months with that number holding steady out to 24 months. And consistent with prior periods, adherence to LUPKYNIS treatment remains strong at approximately 86% at year-end.
The increase in patients on therapy in the quarter was driven predominantly by improvements in new PSF, patient restarts, hospital fills, conversion rates and processing speeds and overall improvements in persistency. Exiting 2023, a total of this represents an increase of over 35% over 2022. As we stated on previous calls, our strategy to grow LUPKYNIS in the lupus nephritis market is focused on three key areas: Educating health care providers on the need to screen and treat more aggressively; second, activating the patient to proactively discuss screening and treatment with their physicians; and lastly, continuing to clinically differentiate LUPKYNIS and position it as part of the foundation therapy in the treatment of lupus nephritis. To address it first, we continue to increase our focus on health care professionals and key opinion leaders by leveraging our long-term clinical data and the updated ULAR and KDIGO guidelines.
Our messaging is focus on encouraging physicians to recognize that all SLE patients may be at risk for lupus nephritis and that active screening for in routinely monitoring lupus nephritis patients are critical. Prioritizing early diagnosis with every SLE patient, treating to target goals and reducing protein levels to minimize steroid use. Start [ Met ] treatment with an effective combination therapy and leverage combination therapies with the goal of increased renal response. And lastly, continuing to treat for at least 3 to 5 years following a complete renal response. We're already seeing meaningful impact from these clinical developments, and we will continue to reinforce this messaging through our robust marketing and sales efforts. In terms of patient activation, we focus our efforts on educating SLE in lupus nephritis patients and driving them to have provocative and proactive conversations with their physicians about screening and treatment. Our messaging reinforces the importance of routine urine screening, the seriousness of the threat of lupus nephritis progressing and the critical need to start and stay on treatment. We deliver these messages through a mix of highly targeted social and digital initiatives as well as in-person advocacy events.
Finally, our customer-facing teams are focused on clinical differentiation and delivering the LUPKYNIS clinical story targeted towards the highest potential writers. Our activities against these targets have steadily increased throughout 2023. And in the fourth quarter, we further increased the depth of prescribing in our current base of customers, and in addition, expanded new customers and new writers. Building on the momentum we established in the fourth quarter, we now have over 5,000 PSF since launch. And based on everything we've discussed today, we're reaffirming our 2024 net product revenue guidance range of $200 million to $220 million. Shifting gears, I'd like to now discuss the conclusion of our strategic review and provide additional context. Please note that you will find further details of the review located within our recently issued annual report on Form 10-K and related press release. To remind everyone how we got here, in connection with our Annual General Meeting held May 17, 2023, certain shareholders express their desire for the company to undergo a strategic review process.
At the 2023 AGM, two of the company's most senior and experienced nominees for directors did not receive requisite majority under the company's majority voting policy and accordingly submitted their resignation to the Board. Those resigning members were replaced with two new directors, both with significant pharma and business development backgrounds. And additionally, in connection with the collaboration agreement that we entered into with one shareholder, we agreed to appoint Dr. Robert Foster, the inventor of voclosporin to our Board. Given the results of the AGM as well as the desires expressed by certain shareholders on June 29, 2023, the company announced that it had initiated exploration of strategic alternatives. It was noted that the process would consider a wide range of options for the company, including, but not limited to, a potential sale, merger or other strategic transactions. The company retained JPMorgan as its financial adviser to lead the strategic review. Following the announcement of the process, JPMorgan and Aurinia put together a comprehensive data room, a corporate presentation and materials to support the overall review process.
JPMorgan then engage with more than 60 parties, that engagement led to 11 nondisclosure agreements being signed with potentially interested parties.
Aurinia also conducted multiple meetings and presented to multiple parties including some that did not sign nondisclosure agreements on a nonconfidential basis. The data room itself was extensive, containing over 200,000 pages of materials across 4,300 files. Despite significant effort put into the exploration of strategic alternatives from Marine's board, its management and our advisers, only one party submitted a preliminary nonbinding expression of interest, which remains subject to customary conditions, including a formal due diligence. After a review of that expression of interest, Aurinia's Board elected to allow that party into a detailed formal diligence process. At the conclusion of its diligence process, the counterparty elected not to submit a formal offer. In addition to exploring the sale of the company, Aurinia also explored multiple alternatives including the potential for acquiring, merging or licensing other entities or assets.
The Board ultimately determined that none of the other alternatives explored and that we're available to it to pursue we're in the best interest of the company and the shareholders. Based on the outcome of this extensive strategic review, the Board believes that the best path forward is for management to streamline its operations as announced today, and focus on the company's commercial execution. We expect this to provide us with financial firepower to create meaningful cash flow which we intend to redeploy in the short term to repurchase shares and over time, continue to build balance sheet strength. As with the financial flexibility to consider a wide range of alternatives over the next few years. This could include diversifying our portfolio through the addition of new pipeline assets or creating scale through the acquisition of commercial assets or other strategies that we believe will allow the company to continue to grow and drive towards its mission. For even more context, in 2018, the company under previous management and at the Board's direction, engaged a leading investment bank and conducted a confidential strategic review process. After extensive outreach, the company received only one nonbinding expression of interest, which included a due diligence process, but in the end, did not result in a formal offer.
And outside of these two expressions of interest, the company has never received any offer of any kind. The Board management, though, remain open to exploring opportunities that are in the best interest of the company and are open to considering any bona fide offers that the company receives. In addition, following the conclusion of the strategic review, the company is reaffirming its commitment to the value enhancement by driving LUPKYNIS growth while maintaining a sharp focus on operating efficiencies and maximizing cash flows. As a result, the company is ceasing further development of both AUR 200 and AUR 300. Correspondingly, the company expects to take a restructuring charge of approximately $11 million to $15 million in the first quarter of 2024. This charge will primarily be made up of severance costs, contract termination costs and other costs associated with terminating these programs. We anticipate reducing employee headcount by at least 25% by the end of the first quarter of 2024. There is no planned reduction in headcount and commercial or commercial supporting roles.
The company expects to recognize annual cost savings of approximately $50 million to $55 million on a go-forward basis with no impact on our commercial investment. In addition, the Board has approved a share repurchase program of up to $150 million of the company's common shares, the maximum amount of which is subject to receipt of regulatory approval in Canada. This reflects confidence in Aurinia's growth prospects and a continued commitment to enhancing both short- and long-term value for shareholders and other stakeholders. While we know there will be questions about timing and details of this near-term strategic shift, I can tell you that we will execute quickly and decisively to maximize the benefits. I'd now like to turn the call over to Joe to provide additional details of the share repurchase program that we announced today as well as a more detailed review of our financial results. I will then return at the end of the call for a quick recap and to open up the line for your questions. With that, Joe?
Thank you, Peter, and good morning, everyone. As Peter previewed, the Board has approved a share repurchase program of up to $150 million in common shares of the company, of which the maximum amount is subject to receipt of exemptive relief in Canada. If granted, it would permit Aurenia to purchase up to 15% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the company in any 12-month period over 36 months. There is no assurance that exemptive relief will be granted. If the exemptive relief is not granted, the maximum the company may purchase under the share repurchase program is 5% of our current issued and outstanding common shares, being 7,230,888 common shares. We plan to begin opportunistic discretionary purchases of shares on the open market beginning on or around February 21, 2024. The company expects to fund the share repurchases from cash flows from operations and cash currently on hand. Further details can be found in our recently issued press release and Form 10-K. I want to emphasize that this repurchase program truly reflects our confidence in Aurinia's growth prospects.
Now let's take a few moments and go into detail regarding our financial results for the fourth quarter and 12 months ended December 31, 2023. As of December 31, 2023, Aurenia had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash and investments of $350.7 million compared to $389.4 million at December 31, 2022. The decrease is primarily related to the continued investment in commercialization activities and post-approval commitments of our approved drug with LUPKYNIS inventory purchases, advancement of our pipeline and mono plan payments, partially offset by an increase in cash receipts from sales of LUPKYNIS. Total net revenue increased 59% to $45.1 million for the fourth quarter compared to the prior year period of $28.4 million. Total net revenue for the year was $175.5 million, an increase of over 31% over the prior year period of $134 million. Total net product revenue increased 49% to $42.3 million for the fourth quarter compared to the prior year period of $28.4 million. Total net product revenue was $158.5 million and $103.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022. The increase in both periods is primarily due to an increase from our two main customers for LUPKYNIS sales, driven predominantly by further penetration of the LN market.
License, collaboration and royalty revenue was $2.8 million for the fourth quarter compared to the prior year period of $109,000. License, collaboration and royalty revenue was $17 million and $30.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2023, license, collaboration and royalty revenue included a $10 million pricing and reimbursement milestone and additional collaboration and manufacturing service revenue from Otsuka. For the year ended December 31, 2022, license collaboration and royalty revenue was primarily due to the recognition of a $30 million regulatory milestone for Otsuka following the EC marketing authorization of LUPKYNIS in September of 2022. Cost of sales and operating expenses for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, were $74.8 million and $56.5 million. Total cost of sales and operating expenses were $267.2 million and $245.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
Let me now give you a further breakdown of operating expenses, drivers and fluctuations. Cost of sales were $5.4 million and $1.4 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022. Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2023, were $14.1 million and $5.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase in both periods was primarily due to increased sales of LUPKYNIS, coupled with the amortization of the Monoplant finance lease right-of-use asset, which was placed into service in late June 2023. Gross margin for the quarter ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, was approximately 88% and 95%. Gross margins for the year ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, was approximately 92% and 96%. Selling, general and administrative expenses, inclusive of share-based compensation expense were $50.1 million and $47.5 million for the fourth quarter's 2023 and 2022, respectively. The increase in total SG&A was primarily due to an increase in share-based compensation expense. For the years ended December 31, 2023, SG&A expenses, inclusive of share-based compensation expense was $195 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, SG&A expenses, inclusive of share-based compensation, was $196.4 million. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in expenses associated with corporate legal matters and insurance.
Noncash SG&A share-based compensation expense was $9.5 million and $7 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022. Noncash SG&A share-based compensation expense was $36.5 million and $28.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022. Research and development expenses, inclusive of share-based compensation expense were $10.2 million and $9.9 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022. R&D expenses, inclusive of share-based compensation expense were $49.6 million and $45 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, December 31, 2022. The primary driver for the increase in R&D expenses for both periods was due to an increase in share-based compensation expense. For the quarter ended December 31, 2023, noncash R&D share-based compensation expense was $1.9 million. For the quarter ended December 31, 2022, noncash R&D shared-based compensation was income of $260,000 and Noncash R&D share-based compensation expense was $7.5 million and $3.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022.
Other expense was $9.1 million versus other income of $2.2 million for the quarters ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022, respectively. Other expense was $8.4 million versus other income of $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022. The increase in expense for both periods is primarily the increase of the foreign exchange loss related to the revaluation of the mono plant finance lease liability, which commenced in June 2023 and is denominated in CHS. Interest income was $4.6 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2023, and $2.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2022. [ Interest ] income was $17 million and $5.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2023, and December 31, 2022. The increase for the quarter and full year was primarily due to higher yields on our investment as a result of higher interest rates year-over-year. For the quarter ended December 31, 2023, Aurinia had recorded a net loss of $26.9 million or $0.19 net loss per common share as compared to a net loss of $26 million or $0.18 NAS per common share for the quarter ended December 31, 2022. For the year ended December 31, 2023, Aurinia recorded a net loss of $78 million or [indiscernible] net loss per common share as compared to a net loss of $108.2 million or $0.76 net loss per common share for the previous period. With that, I'd like to hand the call back over to Peter for some closing remarks. Peter?
Thanks, Joe. I want to close by saying that we built a strong foundation for Aurinia's growth. This near-term shift will make us financially stronger. In the years to come, it will allow us more financial flexibility to continue to explore a range of strategic initiatives. We have a deeply experienced management team that's dedicated and committed to driving commercial success of LUPKYNIS and improving the lives of people suffering from lupus nephritis. We're looking forward to a continued strong performance carried through in 2024. And I want to thank you all for joining us and giving us your time today. I'll now open the lines for any questions. Operator?
[Operator Instructions]. And our first question comes from the line of Maury Raycroft with Jefferies.
This is Farzin on for Maury. For Peter, can you talk more about the assumptions and key drivers behind your revenue guidance of $200 million to [ $205 ] million? And how you had like 231 patient starts and restarts factor in, whereas in the same time period last year, you had like 274. So just wondering on the assumptions.
Yes. Well, first, the assumptions to get to the range that we put out there in terms -- and thank you for the question of guidance factoring, as we said, all the elements of our business, right? But obviously, we've got a keen eye on the metric that you pull out, which is what's your new starts going into the first quarter and how does that potentially impact the full year view? If you look at our PSFs year-over-year and then you add back in new starts that we've had in the hospital channel. And then you project that on a daily basis towards the end of the quarter, I think what you'll see is that we have -- we're experiencing growth, albeit how significant depends on what the continued rate is from now until the end of the quarter, but should project out to the end of the first quarter versus what we did last year. So the PSF and new start number when you include all three of those, looks quite strong through the first several weeks of the year. Recall also that our March is usually at least historically, has been one of our best month, we're not even factoring that in the numbers, but factor that in the numbers could significantly contribute to the overall performance. But Farzin, just to give you the overall, we have to continue to see the type of persistency we've seen. We have to see growth in restarts in the hospital channel, PSFs for sure, time to get in patients on drug. And of course, the new patient starts that you point out, but it's across all elements. And so far, the first quarter read on those has been strong.
Makes sense. And then if possible, for you to share more insights into the strategic review process, was the apprehension primarily due to the valuation disconnect or something else? And do you think interested parties could come back to negotiate is certain, like, say, milestones related to the commercial sales of IPR met?
Well, I listen to the latter part of your question, as we said on the call, we remain open to any and all bonafide opportunities that are brought forward to the company. I can't speak for other parties and nor can I predict the future. But I can tell you that you have a board and a management team that will always remain open to alternative strategies. We don't need to necessarily run a strategic review process. We've always been open to to other opportunities. As for feedback to this specific process, listen, we had a variety of interactions with the parties involved in the strategic review process. And given the nature and the variety and the depth of these interactions as well as the confidential nature of the strategic review process, we can't divulge additional details at this point. We also can't speak on any other party's behalf as the information would be material to their business.
Our next question comes from the line of Joseph Swartz with Leerink Partners.
This is Will on for Joe. Two from us. So just to start, zero-in on the 101 patients that were restart for those from the hospital channel. You provide a breakdown between the two, and do you see this as an area as a potential growth driver for 2024? And are there any kind of appreciable patterns between those patients who are restarting therapy?
Thanks, Will. Yes, the 101 is referring back to the fourth quarter result that when we reported the numerical significance increasing in two channels that we hadn't really historically seen, and that's the patient restarts happening, which we think is a positive signal and then the opening of the hospital channel. And as we've said, the split there -- and listen, we've got one quarter of a trend here, so this could vary. But the split at least in the fourth quarter, was more driven approximately 75% to 80% of those patients came on a restart basis and about 20% of those patients came out of the hospital. As we look at the first several weeks of this quarter, so far, we've seen about 40 in the combination. And unfortunately, at least today, I don't have how that break percentage comes across. But I would assume it's similar to what we saw in the fourth quarter. We look forward to detailing this as we move forward. And I guess what I'd like to underscore here is that while we'll always continue to report how patient start forms come into the company, these other channels are going to become more important. And I think on a go-forward basis, it's going to be very important to look at net new patients, and that will be inclusive of these restarts that we've kicked out of our overall tracking under PSF in channels like hospitals and other networks that haven't historically been purchasing. And we'll, as we always have, continue to give transparency in all areas.
Okay. Great. And then just quickly, thinking about the 9% growth in PSF year-over-year, but seeing 35% growth in the patients on therapy, if I'm quoting your numbers right. Can you just talk a little bit about the dynamic between the two and how PSS might be a bit of a leading indicator and kind of the time lag that's associated with that?
Well, I think there's a couple of things you got to factor in, right? We've never said nor will we say that new patient starts aren't important to look at. But in the first couple of years of the launch is always a question of how long will patients stay on drug over time and what will the persistency look like? And when patients do eventually come off a drug, do they come back to drug. And we're now starting to understand those dynamics better. So when you look at overall patient growth and when you look at that relative to new patients coming in, I think for us, it's somewhat of a -- it's a forecasting dynamic, right? Like it's the persistency that we've seen. And as reported in this quarter, we've seen improvements in 12-month persistency, now above 55% or 56%. And interestingly, when you get to 18 and then 24 months, we've seen at least up to this point, sort of a flattening out of the curve. And I guess I would point to a couple of things. New ULAR and KDIGO guidelines emphasize very clearly that patients should be on medications. And this is irregardless of what medication for 3 to 5 years.
That hasn't been historically how physicians have treated this disease. So although guidelines have been pushing it, it's been treating episodic sort of flares of proteinuria. And I think those guidelines are helpful. Second, in the last 12 to 18 months, we've launched different elements of data that have crossed a couple of different key areas. One, 3-year data looking at both safety and efficacy of the product. So we were first to have data out that far, in particular, looking at EGFR that's an important safety component of tracking impact to the kidney. And then 18-month biopsy data. So remember, in the first year, obviously, we only had the 1-year AURORA study. So I think all that's impacting, and I think you got to look at persistency alongside of new patient starts, and we have to be hitting on both.
Our next question comes from the line of Stacy Ku with TD Cowen..
So we had a few. So I understand that you can't divulge to too many details, but if we could just strictly follow up on an earlier question on strategic review. If you could at least self-critique, what do you think could be the best explanation following the strategic review? Do you think it could be related to something like I competitors coming, not getting enough traction with patient adds. Just some commentary from yourself would be really helpful.
So I'm going to repeat myself, but because of the confidential nature of the strategic review process, there's a limit to the details that we can provide particularly when it comes to other parties business decisions and how they saw things. So we can't speak to the on and other party's behalf as the information could be material to their business.
Okay. Understood. And then as you talk about kind of these patient restarts, as you think about kind of long term, do you think this could really help improvements in retention. And then a quick follow-up on kind of your kind of conversion through year next year. Do you expect to stick around that 85% to 90% level? Or do you think that could continue to improve?
Starting with the last question first. I think the 85 has been fairly consistent. While we've seen quarter-to-quarter a percentage point or 2 directionally up or down. It's been on average, pretty consistent. So I would hold that fairly consistent. In terms of conversions, I still think we have opportunity to continue to increase speed and time to conversion to get patients on drug. So I do think that's one that we can continue to work on, even though we're at a fairly high level, getting 60% of patients on to north of 60% of patients on the drug within 20 days. And then the persistency thing, if you look at the market research data we have and the claims data that we have internally, they show a pretty wide disconnect between what actually happens with patients in the market and where the guidelines are pushing things to go to in terms of two elements, three actually. One is diagnosis. We know that SLE patients, a low percentage actually get a 24-hour urine screen when they come into a doc's office. We need to continue to improve on that. That will grow the market. Second, treating to target is second. So we know from our data that there's a proportion of physicians actually who only treat to high proteinuria. Above what the current guidelines recommend in terms of proteinuria level that would qualify a patient as having active lupus nephritis. So getting active treatment and treatment to target are key opportunities and goals for us. And then lastly, there's this element of physicians treating episodic proteinuria versus sticking to guidelines and treating for and keeping those patients in control for at least 3 to 5 years, which we think obviously bodes well for continuing to see at least stabilization, if not improvement in our persistency rates out past 12 months and 24 months. So all of those elements, I think, when you look at the data we have aligned with the guidelines and the market opportunity bodes well for our growth in the future.
Our next question comes from the line of Ed Arce with H.C. Wainwright & Company.
I have three. First, I wanted to ask about the share repurchase. If you could, can you tell us what expectations do you have for the time line on the decision for exemptive relief? And is that something -- if that decision comes in, is that something that you would announce publicly?
Well, why don't I start, and if I miss anything, Joe can jump in here. The exemptive relief -- I don't know that we have an exact time line for when we'll get a read back from the Canadian authorities on that. But without the exemptive relief, we have up to 5% of our market cap that we have the ability to initiate without that exemptive relief. So as mentioned on the call, at or around the 21st of February is when we would have the ability to be in market if we so chose. And at that point, we would not need the exemptive relief to at least do up to 5% of our market cap. After that would be how we expand above if we get that exemptive relief. Joe, did I miss anything?
To answer your second question around that, Ed, we would also announce that exemptive relief was granted if and when it was granted.
Okay. Great. Secondly, just in terms of the growth drivers you've been consistent over a number of quarters and how educating physicians and activating the patient is really critical here. And I'm wondering, as you work through the dynamic of this market, in getting both patients and physicians, even more importantly, changing the paradigm of the way they treat. Maybe talk about some of the more recent wins that you see and changes in attitudes and perspectives and what is currently working right now.
Well, as we mentioned on the call, although we didn't give the exact numbers, I can tell you, we've seen significant improvement in both depth of prescriptions and breadth of prescriptions. So we're going deeper and we're going wider. So I think our ability to impact our 8 to 10 deciles, our sales force's ability has been there. And even in addition, the broader message of more aggressive treatment in novel therapies like LUPKYNIS is getting out to the broader base of physicians. I would also point to, Ed, the progress that we've seen on persistency, both with improvements at 12 months and sort of a stabilization out to 18 and 24 months. I think those are both directly correlated to the data that's been out, that we put into the marketplace that we produced through the extension study and through the biopsy extension as well or the biopsy substudy and our commercial execution. We look forward to continuing to sharpen the edges of those results with more specifics, but I can tell you there's been progress on every front.
Okay. Great. And then last question, if I may. Given the streamlined focus here on commercial execution of LUPKYNIS, I'm wondering post the reduction in cost structure and headcount, as you look towards the second half of the year, could you perhaps share any commentary on achieving near-term profitability and any growth profit growth and profitability over time.
Yes, you want to jump on that, Joe?
Yes. Thanks, Ed. As you know, we don't provide long-term guidance. We've indicated that on an annualized operating expense basis. We cut about $55 million to $60 million over the next 12 months, of which approximately 75% of that will be recognized in at least 2024. We do believe that with these reduced operating [indiscernible], and our focus on commercial execution, the LUPKYNIS growth specifically, we expect significant cash flows going forward on a go-forward basis. We will -- we obviously update you going forward on profitability. Some of this is tied to the timing around the restructuring charge as well as the share buyback plan. So further insights will come in the future. But for now, we've kind of guided to a $55 million to $60 million OpEx savings on an annualized basis.
We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the call back over to Peter Greenleaf for closing remarks.
Thank you very much. I want to thank everybody for their time today, and we look forward to coming up on future quarters reporting our results and keeping you updated on our plans. Thank you very much for joining us today. Have a great day.
This concludes today's conference, and you may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.