Vesuvius PLC
LSE:VSVS
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
|
US |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
357.5
504
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches GBX.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US | |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Earnings Call Analysis
Summary
Q4-2021
In 2021, Vesuvius achieved an 18% revenue increase to ÂŁ1.64 billion, driven by strategic price hikes due to raw material costs. Trading profit surged 50%, reaching ÂŁ142.6 million, with a notable 190 basis point improvement in return on sales. Despite challenges in China and supply chain issues, Vesuvius maintained a strong cash management focus, lowering its net debt-to-EBITDA ratio to 1.4. Looking ahead, the company expects between ÂŁ4 million and ÂŁ5 million contributions from its Universal acquisition for 2022, forecasting further revenue growth amid positive global demand predictions outside of China.
[Abrupt Start]
...results presentation. My name is
Patrick
André,
Chief Executive
of
Vesuvius. To my right with
me
this
morning
is
Guy
Young,
our
Chief
Financial
Officer.
I
will
start with
some
updates on
the
global
performance
in
2021,
then
Guy
will
give you
more
details
on
our
financials.
And
we
then
conclude with
some perspectives
on
the
year
2022
before
opening
the
floor
of
questions.
Delivered
a
solid
set
of
results
in
2021 with
a
significant
recovery
from
the
low
point
of
2020. Our
revenue
increased
18%
on
an
underlying
basis.
Our trading
profit
increased
50%
on
an
underlying
basis,
but
only
40%
on
a reported
business
due
to
the
significant impact
of
the
bond
depreciation
during
the
year.
Our
return
on
sales
increased
by
190
basis
points.
Our
continued focus
on
cash
management
enabled
us
to further
lower
our
working capital
to
sales
ratio
to
20.9%.
This
focus
on
cash
also
enable
us
to
maintain
our
net
debt
to
EBITDA ratio
at
a
low
level
of
1.4%,
despite
the
acquisition
of
Universal
during
the
year.
Based
on
these
positive
results,
the
board
felt
confident to
propose a
full
year
dividend
of
ÂŁ0.212,
an
increase
of
22%
versus
2020.
We
have
strong
commercial
performance
in 2021
with sales
growth
of
21%
and
20%
in
the
Flow
Control
and
Foundry
divisions,
respectively.
This
was
supported
by material
market
share
gains
in
both
business
divisions. But
even
more
important,
we
demonstrated
again
in
2021
our
ability
to
pass-through
cost
inflation
through
price
increases
in
all
three
of
our
business units.
This
was
completed
by
year end.
The
timing
differences
between
cost and
price
increases
during
the
year,
however,
had
a
negative ÂŁ14
million
on
a
year-over-year
results.
We could
also
in
2021
successfully
complete the
acquisition
of
Universal
Refractories
in
the
US,
which
is
reinforcing
our
presence
in
the
fast-growing Electric Arc Furnace sector
in
this
area. The
Flow
Control
capacity
expansions
in
EMEA
and
India,
which
we
announced
in
July
last
year,
are
fully
on
track
and
will be
operational
as
of
year end.
Finally,
thanks to
our
decision
to
maintain
R&D
spend
during
[indiscernible]
(00:03:38),
we
could
launch
27
new
products
in
2021,
double
the
number
of
last
year.
We
also
made
significant
progress
in
our sustainability
roadmap
in
2021. As
you
can
see on
this
slide, we
are
well
on
track to
achieve the
nine intermediate
ESG targets
for 2025,
which
we
announced
at
our 2020
annual results.
In particular,
we
are
now
clearly
exceeding
and
will
revise
upward
our
target
of
CO2
reduction
with
already a
16.5%
reduction
in
2021, as
compared
with
2019.
As
you
can
see
on
the
slide,
we've
made
continuous
and
structural progress
in
the
reduction
of
our
carbon footprint
since
we
engaged
in our
improvement journey
in 2017.
Thanks
to
these
efforts, we
have
already
been
able
to
eliminate
close
to
a
quarter
of
our
emissions
worldwide.
We
will
continue our effort
going
forward
and
are
committed
to
reach
net
zero
by
2050 at
the
latest.
How
did we
achieve
those
results? First,
of
course, by
optimizing
our
energy
consumption. We
reduced
by
9%
our energy
consumption
per tonne
since 2019,
but two
other
actions
also
played
an
important
role.
We
engaged
into
a
focused
action
plan
to
switch
to
non-CO2
emitting
electricity
sources
everywhere
in
the
world where
it
was
possible.
For
the
first
time
in
2021,
more
than
50%
of
our
global
electricity
consumption
is
coming
from
non-CO2
emitting
sources.
Our
objective
is
to
reach
100%
by
2030.
We
also
introduced
an
internal
carbon
pricing
to
assess
all
of
our
management
decisions,
including
investment
decisions.
This
price
is
reviewed
annually
and
has
been
set
at
€90
per
tonne
in
2022.
Beside
reducing
our
own
CO2
footprint,
we
are
also
now
engaging
in
a
focused
R&D
effort
to
develop
new
products
having
the
potential
to
help
our
customers
improve
their
own environmental
footprint.
More
than
80%
of
our
product
R&D
portfolio
is
now
dedicated
to
products
presenting
an
environmental
benefit
for
our
customers.
All
those
progress
on
our
sustainability
agenda
were
recognized
by
external
rating
agencies
and,
in
particular,
our
MSCI
rating
improved
from
BBB
to
A;
and
our Ecovadis
rating
progressed
from
silver
to
gold.
Let's
now
have
a
deeper
look
at
the
performance
of
the
Steel
Division.
As
you
can
see
on
this
slide,
where
the
size
of
the bubbles
is
proportional
to
Vesuvius'
Steel
Division
sales,
the
steel
market
recovered
significantly
in
the
world,
excluding
China,
in
2021.
In
China,
however,
after
a
relatively
good
performance
in
the
first
half
of
the
year,
the
steel
market
declined
significantly
in
the
second
half,
translating
into
the
first
year-on-year
decline
of
Chinese
steel
production
for
more
than
30
years.
We
believe
this
is
not
only
a
short-term
phenomena
but,
rather,
a
structural
trend
and
that
Chinese
steel
production
going
forward
should
be
flat
or
even
slightly
declining.
In
this
market
environment,
our
Flow
Control
business
performed
very
positively,
gaining
market
share
in
all
geographies
without
any
exception.
You
can
see
on
this
slide
the
relative
performance
of
our Flow
Control
sales
versus the
steel
market
in
the
most
important
regions.
These
Flow
Control
numbers
only
include
a
relatively
moderate
3.5%
average
price
increase
[ph]
runway (00:08:27)
basis,
as
price
increases
mostly
took
effect
in
the
third and
fourth
quarter
of
the
year.
Another
important
highlight
of
the
year
for
the
Steel
Division
was
the
acquisition
in
December
of
Universal
Refractories
in
the
US.
Universal
is
a niche
refractory
supplier,
active
in
both
the
steel
continuous
casting
area
for
around
90%
of
its
activity
and
the
foundry
sector
for
around
10%.
It
will
reinforce
both
our
Advanced
Refractories
and
Foundry
business
units
in
NAFTA.
The
transaction
was
concluded
at
6.6
times
Universal
trailing
EBITDA
of
$8.6
million
and
we
expect
to
generate,
on
top
of
this,
additional
synergies
of
$4.5
million
by
the
end
of
2023.
If
we
look
at
the
financial
results
of
the
Steel
Division,
we
already
discussed
the
very
good
sales
progression
of
Flow
Control.
As
you
can
see
there,
the
sales
growth
of
Advanced
Refractories
was
more
limited
as
priority
was
given
to
the
implementation
of
price
increases
to
compensate
cost
increases.
This
resulted
in
market
share
losses
in
some
regions
and,
in
particular,
in
EMEA
and
North
America
for
Advanced
Refractories.
We
believe
that
those
market
share
losses
are
temporary
and
will
revert
over
time.
We
are
starting
to
see
that
beginning
of
2022.
Our
price
increases
could
fully
compensate
cost
increases
in
both
Flow
Control
and
Advanced
Refractories
by
year end.
Our
flow
capacity
– our
Flow
Control
capacity
expansions
announced
in
July
last
year
are
proceeding
on
track
and
will
be
operational
as
from
the
end
of
this
year.
They
will
support
the
continuous
growth of
our
Flow
Control
business
going
forward.
The
trading
profit
of
the
division
improved
by
42%
on
an
underlying
basis
to
ÂŁ102.1
million.
Our
return
on
sales
improved
by
150
basis
points
to
8.7%.
Let's
now
have
a
look
at
the
performance
of
the
Foundry
Division.
As
you
can
see
there,
the
important
automotive
end
market
performed
poorly
in
2021,
as
it
continued
to
be
negatively
impacted
by
the
worldwide
shortage
of
semiconductors.
The light vehicle
market
grew
only
2%
overall
from
the
very
low
level
of
2020.
The
medium
and
heavy
vehicle
market
also
performed
poorly
due
to
a
strong
decline
in
China,
which
you
can
see
on
this
slide
also,
with
an
overall
growth
limited
to
0.5%.
Together,
the
light,
medium
and
heavy
vehicle
market
represents
around
36%
of
Foundry
Division
sales.
The
other
Foundry
end
markets,
however,
performed
much
better
and
recovered
significantly
from
the
low
point
of
2020,
partially
compensating
the
weakness
in
automotive.
To understand
the
Foundry
Division
results,
it
is
also
important
to
look
at
the
evolution
of
end
markets
between
H1
and
H2,
which
you
can
see
on
this
slide.
Automotive
end
markets,
in
particular,
weakened
significantly
between
H1
and
H2
with
a
negative
impact
on
the
sales
volumes
and
performance,
of
course,
of
the
Foundry
Division.
Despite
these
weak
automotive
end
markets, the
Foundry
Division
grew
itself
by
20%
year-on-year
on
an
underlying
basis.
In
particular,
the
division
could
achieve
significant
market
share
gains
in
China,
in
India
and
in
South
America.
Trading
profit
increased
79%
to
ÂŁ40.4
million,
and
return
on
sales
improved
by
280
basis
points
to
8.6%.
This
is
a
significant
improvement
from
2020,
but
we
believe
the
potential
for
further
improvement
is
very
significant
as
full
trading
profit
and
margin
recovery
was
delayed
in
2021
by
the
situation
of
the
automotive
market,
by
some time
lag
[indiscernible]
(13:26)
between
price
and
cost
increases,
and
by
operational
issues
in
two
of
our
important
plants
in
Germany
and
in
the
US.
On
the
technology
front,
globally
Vesuvius,
we
continue
to
increase
our
R&D
spend
with
the
objective
to
reinforce
of
technological
lead
over
competition.
We
launched
27
new
products
in
2021,
more
than
double
the
number of
launch
in
2020,
and
we
are
planning
to
maintain
that
pace
going
forward.
As
mentioned
earlier,
we
also
increased
our R&D
focus
on
products,
having
a
positive
impact
on
our
customers'
environmental
performance.
You
have
on
this
slide
three
examples
for
each
of
our
three
business
units
of
new
products
launch
in
2021
and
which
next
to
financial
benefits,
of
course,
also
bring
environmental
performance
improvements
to
our
customers
in
terms
of
CO2
emissions,
harmful
substances
emissions
or
raw
material
consumption.
I
will
now
hand
over
to
Guy,
who
will
give
you
more
details
on
our
financial
performance.
Guy?
Thanks,
Patrick.
Good
morning,
everyone.
I'd
like
to
start
by
looking
at
our
sales
and
trading
profit
bridges.
2021
reported
revenue
of
ÂŁ1.64
billion
is
some
13%
higher
than
last
year's
ÂŁ1.46
billion.
Stripping
out
the
ÂŁ69
million
impact
of
foreign
exchange
from
2020
gives
our
prior-year
underlying
revenue
of
ÂŁ1.39
billion,
on
which
we've
reported
an
increase
of
ÂŁ251
million
or
18%
to
reach
this
year's
ÂŁ1.64
billion
of
revenue,
excluding
the
effect
of
the
universal
acquisition.
It's
worth
noting
that
approximately
25%
of
the
revenue
increase
in
the
year
was
due
to
price
increases
in
reaction
to
raw
material
cost
increases
and
supply
chain
friction
costs.
In
terms
of
trading
profit,
our
underlying
trading
profit
after
eliminating
the
effects
of
FX
and
the
universal
acquisition
increased
by
50%
from
ÂŁ94.8
million
to
ÂŁ142.6
million.
The
key
constituents
of
this
increase
were
ÂŁ57.7
million
from
increased
sales
and
ÂŁ4.1
million
of
restructuring
savings,
partially
offset
by
ÂŁ14
million
of
net
inflationary
costs
as
our
selling
price
increases
lagged
cost
inflation.
If
we
take
a
look
now
at
the
full
income
statement.
Our
trading
profit
of
ÂŁ142.4
million
provided
a
return
on
sales
of
8.7%,
an
increase
of
170
basis
points
over
last
year
on
a
reported
basis
and
190
basis
points
on
an
underlying
basis.
Our
share
of
post-tax
JV
results
was
similarly
higher,
and
our
net
finance
costs
were
lower,
having
benefited
from
a
lower
cost
of
debt
following
the
successful
refinancing
of
some
of
the
USPP
notes.
The
effective
tax
rate
for
the
year
was
lower
than
the
prior
year
at
26.4%,
and
non-controlling
interest
was
higher
given
the
higher
earnings
at
our
Indian
subsidiaries.
Headline
earnings,
therefore,
increased
slightly
more
than
headline
profit
before
tax
and
trading
profit
by
some
53%,
and
headline
EPS
came
in
at
ÂŁ0.353,
52%
higher
than
2020.
If
we
turn
now
to
cash.
Cash
conversion
in
2021
was
32%,
largely
as
a
result
of the
higher
investments
during
the
year
in
both
working
capital
of
ÂŁ96
million
and
cash
CapEx
of
some
ÂŁ45.5
million
which,
after
adding
back
depreciation
and
taking
into
account
other
small
deductions,
resulted
in
adjusted
operating
cash
flow
of
ÂŁ45.6
million.
The
increase
in
working
capital
was
predominantly
in
inventory,
some
ÂŁ113
million
as
we
intentionally
increased
inventory
to
mitigate
against
the
risk
of
supply
chain-related
customer
disruptions.
But
despite
the
higher
investment
in
working
capital,
our
trade
working
capital
to
sales
ratio
showed
another
improvement
year-on-year
finishing
at
20.9%.
Looking
finally
at
our
net
debt.
The
balance
as
at
December
2021
of
ÂŁ277
million,
and
net
debt-to-EBITDA
at
1.4
times
on
a
post-IFRS
16
basis
is
some
ÂŁ102
million
higher
than
2020,
largely
due
to
the
investment
in
working
capital
and
the
acquisition
of
Universal.
We
remain
well
within
our
comfort
zone
of
1.25
to
1.75
times,
and
satisfied
in
particular
in
relation
to
our
capital
allocation
strategy
for
the
year
where
we've
managed
both
significant
investments
in
organic
and
inorganic
growth
during
2021,
while
still
providing
for
an
increase
in
returns
to
our
shareholders.
With
that,
I
hand
you
back
to
Patrick
to
take
you
through
the
outlook.
Thank you, Guy. Both
of
end
markets
of
Steel
and
Foundry
remain
positively
oriented
in
2022.
In
2021,
Vesuvius
demonstrated
its
ability
to
successfully
pass-through
cost
inflation
through
price
increases.
We
will
continue
to
do
so
in
2022
as
necessary.
Our
strategic
R&D
and
capacity
investments
are
proceeding
as
planned.
And
we'll
support
our
market
share
gains
going
forward.
While
we
remain
concerned
about
the
potential
direct
and
indirect
impacts
of
recent
geopolitical
events,
which
have
led
us
to
suspend
our
deliveries
to
Russian
customers
for
the
duration
of
hostilities,
we
are
nevertheless
confident
that
the
group
will
deliver
a
significant
improvement
in
financial
performance
in
2022.
Thank
you
for
your
attention.
We
will now
take
questions
from
the
floor.
Thank
you. Scott
here
from
Investec.
Could
you
just
give
us
a
feel
for
the
price
increases
that
you've
put
in
through
the
second
half
and
how
that
sort
of
annualizes
through
full-year
2022, like,
what
is
the
tailwind
for
prices
that
we
didn't get
the
full
year
benefit
in
2021?
And
also,
just
a
bit
of help
on
acquisition
contribution,
just trying
to
get
a
feel for
where
we
are
before
sort
of
deciding
what
we
think
volume
should
be.
Thank
you.
Thanks,
Scott.
Nice
to
see
someone
face-to-face
for
a
while –
for
a
change.
And
Scott,
in
terms
of
the
price
increases,
very
heavily
weighted
towards the
second
half,
I
think
as
Patrick
mentioned,
if
you
split,
you
take
that
ÂŁ251 million
and
25%
of
that.
That
gives
you
our
price
increases
of
roughly
ÂŁ62
million.
That
ÂŁ62
million,
ÂŁ55
million of
it
was
in
the
second
half.
So,
arguably
that
doubled
up
from
a
sales
bridge
perspective
in
2022.
I
think
kind
of
aligned
to
the
question,
the
ÂŁ14
million
of
headwind
we
would
expect
to
see
at
the
back
as
well
subject
to
any
price
lags
that
we
will
experience
during
2022,
which
I
think
is
inevitable,
given
that we
know
costs
are
increasing
at
the
moment
over
Q4.
In
terms
of
the
second
question, Universal. The
Universal
contribution
for
2022
should
be
about
between
ÂŁ4 million
and
ÂŁ5
million,
the
ÂŁ4 million
to
ÂŁ5
million
includes
the
synergies
that
we
expect
delivered
in
year.
It,
however,
also
has
a
deduct
because
as
you
will probably
know
from
an
accounting
perspective,
we
have
to
write
up
the
value
of
stock
to
realizable
value
at
acquisition,
so
we
won't
see
all
of
the
margin
that
we
would
expect
in
terms
of
long-term
run
rates
in
the
first
year,
but
ÂŁ4 million
to
ÂŁ5 million in 2022.
Thank you.
Hi. Good
morning. Dom Convey from Numis.
Three
questions,
if
I
may,
just
you
mentioned in
terms of
the
outlook
positively
oriented,
but
it
just
feels
actually
that
there
has
been
a
marked
softening
in
the
broader
outlook
for
2022
versus
what
we
might
have
thought
three
or
four
months
ago,
looking
at
some
of
the
slides
that
you
presented
on
Foundry.
It
shows
that
China
very
much
weak
across
the
board.
So, I
just
wonder
whether
you
could
give
a
little
bit
more
color
on
the
volume
type
growth
by
geographies
that
you
anticipate
this
year.
And
secondly,
just
in
terms
of
a
bigger
picture
question.
That
increase
in
R&D
and
obviously
the
strong
product
pipeline
coming
through,
whether
you
could
just
give
a
bit
more
color
around
how
you
see
the
sustainability
value
proposition
and
how
you
could
best
capture
that.
And
I
guess
just
a
quick
technical
one really
for
perhaps
Guy, that
ÂŁ14
million
drag,
what
was
the
divisional
split
last
year
between
Steel
and
Foundry?
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
You're
perfectly
right,
as
compared
with
the
vision
we
could
have
had
six
months
ago,
the
market
evolution
perspective
are
a
bit
weaker,
but
they
remain,
in
our
opinion,
positive
and
even
significantly
positive
outside
of
China
going
forward.
China,
following
Chinese
New
Year,
has a
traditional
rebound of
the
Chinese
economy
following
Chinese
New
Year,
is
pretty
soft
for
the
time
being.
But
in
the
world
outside
of
China,
the
situation
is
relatively
positive
and
remains
positive
as
we
speak.
In
the
Steel
markets,
you
may
have
seen
the
numbers
of –
January
as
published
by
WSA,
there
is
a
significant
drop
year-on-year
in
China,
but
there
is
a
progression
year-on-year
in
the
world
outside
of
China.
Now,
if
you
look
at
the
world
outside
of
China,
overall
progression,
and
to
give
you
an
overall
global
figure,
we
are
expecting ourselves
a
positive
growth
all
regions
together
of
on
or
around
5%
in
2022,
but
of
course,
you
have
differences
between
regions.
And
in
the
world
outside
of
China,
the
regions
where
the
growth
will
probably
be
the
slowest
is
Europe,
where
we
see
some
–
not
decline
but
softening,
some
softening.
There
was
beginning
of
the
year,
a
decline
year-on-year
of
steel
production
in
EU
plus
UK.
And
so,
this
will
probably
be
the
softest
region
outside
of
China.
But
globally,
the
world
outside
of
China,
we
see
that
growing
in
2022
because
all
the
regions,
India,
Southeast
Asia,
South
America,
Middle
East,
Africa
and
probably
North
America,
we
believe, will
have
a
positive
growth
in
2022.
Regarding
R&D,
we
are
focusing
more
and
more
on
this –
on
the
year
and
month
old
value
proposition.
But
of
course,
next
to
a
traditional,
if
I
may
call
it
like
that,
the
financial
value
proposition
to
our
customers
and
the
– we
see
a
growing
interest
from
our
customers,
especially
in
the
steel
industry,
for
these
leading
sustainable
products.
And
this
interest
is,
of
course,
different
between
regions.
So,
where
there
are
some
regions,
particularly
in
Europe,
as
you
could
suspect,
where
the
interest
is
higher
than
average,
while
some
other
regions
where
there
is
still
a
maturation
of
the
psychology
of
our
customers
but
everywhere
it's growing.
So,
it's
not
growing –
the
interest
and
awareness
of
our
customers
is
not
going
everywhere
at
the
same
pace,
but
it's
going
everywhere
and
clearly
in
some
regions
like
Europe
and
also
in
North
America, we
see
a
growing
interest
of
some
customers
for
these
leading
sustainable
products,
and
we
believe
that
it
will
only increase
going
forward.
We
are
not
even
– we
were
even engaging
some
customers
have proposal,
we
have
accepted
of
course,
to
engage
with them
in
some
joint
R&D
project
with a
specified
objective
to
work
together
on
ways
to
help
them
reduce
their
CO2
footprint.
And
Dom,
in
terms
of
the
split
of
the
14%,
it's
3%
is
Foundry
and
the
rest
is
Steel.
Any
other
questions
from
the
room?
If
there
are
no more
questions
from
the
room,
I
will
propose
to
take
questions
from
the
line.
[Operator Instructions]
We
will
pause
for
a
moment
to
assemble
the
queue.
As
a
reminder,
participants
can
also
submit
questions
through
the
webcast
page
using
the
Ask
a
Question
button.
And
our
first
question
is
coming
from
George
Featherstone
from
Bank
of
America.
Please
go
ahead.
Your
line
is
open
now.
Hi.
Morning,
everyone.
Thanks for
taking my
questions.
I'll
go
one
at
a
time.
Wondered
if
firstly,
Guy,
you
could
break
out
the
cost
inflation
by
frictional
costs
in
the
supply
chain
and
also
that
you
face
in
raw
materials
in
2021,
and
also,
if
you
can
split
H1
versus
H2
and
also
how
you
see
that
evolving
in
2022?
Sure,
George.
Thank
you
for
the
first
question
with
three
parts.
George,
if
we
take
a
look,
I'll
probably
just
concentrate
on
the
two
key
categories. There
is
broader cost
inflation. But
in terms
of
raw material,
which
was
the
biggest
constituent
part
of
the
cost
increase
last
year,
that
was
some ÂŁ40
million
across
the
group.
And
that
splits
roughly
speaking
into
ÂŁ7
million and
ÂŁ33 million
first
half
versus
second
half.
The
other
significant
category
is
excess
freight
costs,
and
that
was
about
ÂŁ20 million
for
the
full
year
and
that
again
splits
roughly
ÂŁ9
million
and
then
ÂŁ11 million.
On
top
of
those
and
we
call
it
excess
freight
costs
because
there
are
still
higher
freight
costs
in
terms
of
inbound
logistics
that
we
haven't
included
in
that,
and
then
we'll
have
still
salary
and
other
energy
costs
which
have
also
increased.
But
the
broad
split
then
of
the
ÂŁ60
million
cost
increases, ÂŁ40
million
raw
material,
ÂŁ20 million
excess
freight,
and
the
net
that
splits
H1
to
H2
as
I
outlined.
In
terms
of
the
costs
going
forward,
I
can
only
tell
you
what
we
can
see
now
rather
than
trying
to
predict
what's
going
to
happen
going
forward.
But
we've
still
seen
some
very
significant
energy
costs
increase
between
the
end
of
Q4
and
where
we
sit
today.
Arguably,
that's
only
going
to
get
worse.
In
addition
to
that,
we
think
that
there
are
increasing
pressures
from
a
logistics
cost
perspective
that
we'll
be
seeing,
at
least,
during
Q1.
And
then
last
but
not
least,
we've
got
a
number
of
raw
materials
that
have
started
to
increase
in
Q4
and
continue
to
increase
in
Q1
predominantly
aluminas
and
zirconias,
and
anything
that
requires
energy.
So,
a
lot
of
our
fused
materials,
all
of
those
we're
expecting
to
see
impact
our
cost
base
in
the
first
quarter.
Thank
you
very
much
for that.
Second
question
would
be
more
of
a
kind
of higher
longer-term
thought.
And
given
the
cost
pressures
that your
customers
are
facing,
I
wondered
if
you
could
talk
about
whether
the
conversation is
around
total
cost
of
ownership
of
some
of the
new,
more
efficient
products
for
those
involve
automation
have
become
easier
and
if
customers
are
looking
to
start
new
investment
cycles.
It's
a
very
good
question.
Our
customers
are
as
we
are,
but
our
customers
are
also
confronted
with
increasing
cost
base.
They
have
been
quite
successful,
as
you
know,
in
increasing
their
own
prices
and
considering
the
recent
geopolitical
events
that
steel
prices
have
been
going
slightly
down
over
the
past
few
months.
You
should
expect
that
this
downward
trend
should
probably
stop
and
that
we
would
not
be
surprised
to
see
those
steel
prices
going
up
again.
So,
the
financial
situation
of
our
customers
is
good
and
will
remain
good
going
forward.
And
this,
of
course,
gives
us
the
means
to
implement
long-term
strategies
to
consolidate
their
competitiveness
on
the
long
term.
So,
we
see
our
customers
are
open
to
investing
in
their
operations
to
make
those
operations
more
competitive
structurally
on
a
long-term
basis,
and
this
is
a
favorable
environment
for
our
own
offering
and,
in
particular,
our
own
robotics
offering
to
support
the
automation
effort
of
our
customers.
And
we
see
there
was
already
a
significant
interest
from
our
customer
base
for
our
robotics
solutions.
We
see
an
even
bigger
interest
of
those
customers
going
forward.
We
have
a
significant
increase
of
the
number
of
inquiries
coming
from
our
customers for
robotics
projects.
Thank
you very
much for
that.
And
we
do
not have
any
further
questions
at
the
moment
on
the
audio
line.
[Operator Instructions]
And
there
are
no
further
questions
on
the
conference
line.
We
will
now
address
the
questions
submitted
via
the
webcast
page.
And
the
first
question
here
is
coming
from
Andrew
Douglas
from
Jefferies.
Please,
can
you
explain
how
you
managed
to
win
such
significant
market
share
when
you
already
have
such
high
levels
of
market
share?
We
are
not
magicians, Andy.
So
it's,
first,
as
long
as
you
do
not
have
100%
market
share,
it's already –
it's
always
possible
to
gain further
market
share.
So,
the
only
limit
is
100%.
And
we
are
never
satisfied
with
our
market
share,
even
when
the
market
share
is
already high
because
we
believe
that
our
customers
can
bring
benefit
to
those
customers
which
are
not
already
using
our
products.
It
is
in Flow Control
and
Foundry
that
we
are
gaining
and
that
we
have
a
real continuous
market
share
gain
strategy.
And
in
both
those
divisions,
as
you
have
seen
last
year
and
you
will
continue
to
see
this
year
and
going
forward,
we
simultaneously
increased
prices
to
compensate
for
cost
increases
and
increased
market
share.
And
the
reason
why
we
are
able
to
do
that
is
because
our
products,
thanks
to
our
R&D
investments –
and
again,
I
can
only
stress the
fact
that
R&D
is
a
cornerstone
of
our
growth
and
market
share
gain
strategy.
It's
thanks
to
R&D
that
we
can
propose
to
our
customer
products
which
create
superior
value
in
the
process
of
those
customers,
as
compared
with
what
our
competitors
are
able
to
do.
And
thanks
to
that,
despite
the
fact
that
we
have,
I
would
say,
fair
pricing
strategy
compensating
for
cost
increases,
it
creates
incentives
and growing
incentive
for
customers
worldwide
to
switch
to
our
products.
So,
this
is
exactly
the
reason
why
we
continue
to
invest
and
even
to
accelerate,
to
increase
our
investment
in
R&D
because
R&D
is
the
fuel
of
our
market
share
gain
strategy
in
both
Flow
Control
and
Foundry.
And
more and
more,
we
will
see
that
in
the
coming
years
in
Advanced
Refractories
because
there,
also,
we
are
– our ambition
is
not
to
remain
in
the
commoditized
part
of
the
advanced
refractory
market;
we
also
want
inside
this
advanced
refractory
world
to
focus
on
the
limited
number
of
product
lines
where
we
believe
that,
thanks
to
R&D,
we
could
create
a
similar model
as
the
one
which
works
very
well
for
Foundry
and
Flow
Control
and
progressively
become
a
specialized
advanced
refractory
producer
concentrating
on
high-technology
product.
Thank
you
very
much.
And
the
next
question
from
Andrew.
Please,
can
you
give
us
an
update
on
stocking
levels
in
the
market
across
your
customers?
I
understand
that
there
has
been
some
restocking
in
the
year.
Yes.
You're
right.
Over
the
past
three,
four
months ago,
in
the
steel
market
in
particular,
if
you
remember,
three,
four
months
ago,
we
were
at
a
very
low –
abnormally
low
level
of
inventories
in
the
steel
market.
And
over
the
past
three, four
months,
we've
seen
a
small
but
regular
restocking
effect
in
the
steel
market
worldwide.
And
steel
inventories
have
moved
from
abnormally
low
to
normal.
They
are
not
abnormally
higher,
despite
the
fact
that
they
are
increasing,
absolutely
not
abnormally
high.
Now,
we
are
most
probably
reaching
another
inflection
point
because
Russia
and
Ukraine
are
very
significant
net
exporter
of
steel
toward
the
rest
of
the
world.
Ukraine
alone
exports on or
around
15 million
tonnes
of
steel
to
the
rest
of
the
world,
and
this
export
have
stopped.
So,
we
will
probably have,
I
don't
have
a
crystal
ball,
but
the
most
likely
scenario
is
that,
in
the
coming
weeks
and
months,
we
will
see
a
further
decline
of
steel
inventories
and
steel
prices
will
probably
stop
to
decline
and
maybe
even
going
up
again.
So,
the
Russia-Ukraine
situation
will
have
an
impact
on
the
steel
market
outside
of
Russia
and
Ukraine
because
there
will
be
a
need
to
fill
the
gap
created
by
the
interruption
or
disruption
of
exports
from
Russia
and
Ukraine
to
the
rest
of
the
world.
Thank
you
very
much.
And
the
next
question
from
Andrew
is,
can
you
please
talk
about
your
M&A
pipeline
and,
particularly,
the
size
of
potential
deals
and
are
price
expectations
at
the
right
level?
Excuse
me, could
you repeat
the
question.
I
could not
catch
the beginning
of
the
question.
Can
you
please
talk
about
your
M&A
pipeline
and,
particularly,
size
of
potential
deals?
And
are
price
expectations
at
the
right
level?
M&A
pipeline.
Thank
you
very
much
for
the
question.
Our
M&A
strategy
has
not
changed
as
compared
with
our
previous
discussion
last
year,
we
have
a
strong
appetite
for
M&A.
Together
with
Guy,
we conducted
a
few
years
ago
a
global
strategic
review
of
all
potential –
potentially
interesting,
attractive
M&A
targets
worldwide
for
all,
each
of
our
three
divisions. We
ended
up
identifying
all of
around
20
potentially
attractive
targets.
This
list
is
mostly
unchanged,
as
compared
with
what
we
elaborated
together
with
Guy
four
years
ago.
And
we
have
been
and
we
continue
to
engage
proactively
with
the
owners of
these
potential
target.
As
far
as
we
are
aware,
none
of
them
are
officially
for
sale
as
we
speak.
And
what
we
see
is
a
progressive
evolution
of
some
of
the
owners
being
ready
to
consider
some
sales,
this
is
what
enable
us
to
realize
the
CCPI
first
and
the
Universal
acquisitions
over
the
past
few
years.
So,
we
continue
to
be
interested
and
if
one
of
the
owners
that
we
have
approached would
become
open
to
a
transaction
at
a
fair
price,
what
we
consider
a
fair
and
reasonable
price,
we
will
of
course
be
interested.
In
terms
of
size,
Andy,
there
again,
it
has
not
changed.
Out
of
these
20
–
or on and around
20
potential
target,
the
vast
majority
of
them
are
small-
to
mid-sized
bolt-ons
like
CCPI
or
Universal.
These
mid-sized
bolt-ons
are
very
attractive
for
us.
Their
integration
is
easier,
synergies
are
high,
so
we
are
quite
attracted
by
this.
And
a
small
minority
of
these
acquisitions
are
larger
size
but,
of
course,
the
probability
that
such
larger
size
acquisition
will
materialize
is
lower than
bolt-on.
So,
we
continue
to
be
proactively
interested
in
M&A
and
we'll
see
what
will
happen
or
not
in
the
coming
months.
But
we
remain
extremely
disciplined
in
our
approach.
We're
proactive
interested
but
disciplined
in
our
approach
to
M&A.
Thank
you
very
much.
And
the
next
question
from
Andrew
is
that,
do
you
believe
that
any
more
restructuring
is
needed?
Are
you
happy
that
your
footprint
is
in
the
right
place –
[ph]
shape (00:42:36)
given
your
expectations
for
your
end
markets
over
the
next
few
years?
Thank
you.
And
several
questions
in
the
same
question.
The
heavy lifting
of
restructuring
is
behind
us.
Clearly,
we've
done
the
job
over
the
past
five
years,
so
the
heavy
lifting
of
restructuring
is
behind
us.
We
still
have
many
opportunities
of
optimization
of
each
of
our
individual
plans
to
get
more
out
of
those
plants,
and
we
are
strongly
engaging
to
that.
In
particular,
in
our
flagship
plant – in
our
four
flagship
plants
of Skawina
in
Poland,
Suzhou
in
China,
Borken
in
Germany,
and
Monterrey
in
Mexico, we are –
we
have
strong
improvement
programs.
We
have
room
to
make
the
positive
progress
there.
But
the heavy
lifting
of
restructuring
is
behind
us.
Could
you
remind
me
the
second
part
of
your
question, Andy?
There
are
no
further questions.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
that
concludes
today's
question-and-answer
session. I
will
now
hand
back
to
Patrick
André
for his
concluding
remarks.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
to
all
of
you
today,
all
of you
have
made
the
effort
of
being present
physically
with
us
and
in
the
room,
but
also
all
of
you
online.
Thank
you
for
your
attention
during
the
presentation,
and
I
wish
all
of
you
a
very
nice
day.
Good bye.