London Stock Exchange Group PLC
LSE:LSEG
US |
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
Media
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
Technology
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
Road & Rail
|
|
CN |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
Automobiles
|
|
US |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
Professional Services
|
|
US |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
Construction
|
|
US |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
Semiconductors
|
|
US |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
Semiconductors
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
8 322
10 880
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches GBX.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Fubotv Inc
NYSE:FUBO
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
C
|
C3.ai Inc
NYSE:AI
|
US |
Uber Technologies Inc
NYSE:UBER
|
US | |
NIO Inc
NYSE:NIO
|
CN | |
Fluor Corp
NYSE:FLR
|
US | |
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
NYSE:J
|
US | |
TopBuild Corp
NYSE:BLD
|
US | |
Abbott Laboratories
NYSE:ABT
|
US | |
Chevron Corp
NYSE:CVX
|
US | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp
NYSE:OXY
|
US | |
Matrix Service Co
NASDAQ:MTRX
|
US | |
Automatic Data Processing Inc
NASDAQ:ADP
|
US | |
Qualcomm Inc
NASDAQ:QCOM
|
US | |
Ambarella Inc
NASDAQ:AMBA
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to today's London Stock Exchange Group Q3 Results Investor Call. [Operator Instructions] I must advise you this conference is being recorded today, on Friday, the 19th of October 2018.And now I would like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Paul Froud. Please go ahead, sir.
Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us on the call. With me this morning, David Warren, Group CFO; Tom Woodley; and myself. So normal format: We're going to summarize the Q3 performance very briefly, and then we're going to turn it over to questions at the end of that.So let me hand you over to David.
Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. We've delivered another quarter of progress and growth. Let me give you some of the highlights. Q3 income increased 8% year-on-year to GBP 522 million, and for the year-to-date, we are up 10% at GBP 1.58 billion. Gross profit for Q3 is up 8% after cost of sales and up 11% for the 9 months year-to-date.As you will have seen from our statement this morning, we are now incorporating the impacts of adopting IFRS 15. This accounting standard affects the way we recognize revenues in the Primary Markets businesses within the Capital Markets segment. The effects of the changes are backdated to the start of 2018, and we give more detail for Q1 and Q2 in the announcement. In summary, the net P&L effect is to reduce admission fee income by GBP 9 million, which is an aggregation of the changes for the 9 months year-to-date. This changes what would have been a 2% increase in Q3 revenue for Capital Markets to an 8% reduction. At a group level, Q3 income would have risen 9% rather than by 8%. To be clear, this does not impact the cash we receive for new and further admissions, which is collected as before. It is just that we recognize the revenue over a period of between 4 to 11 years in most cases, depending on the service. And we'll give more detail on the effects when we report our full year numbers.So now let's pick out a few highlights. Starting with Information Services, where our reported revenues increased 17% and up 9% on an organic and constant currency basis. This comprised 20% headline growth at FTSE Russell or 9% growth after adjusting for FX and revenues from yield book. Real-time data revenues were flat, while revenue from other services grew following year-on-year growth at UnaVista.Turning next to LCH. Total income increased 15% on both a reported and like-for-like basis. OTC clearing performed strongly, as revenue increased by 12%, with SwapClear growth driven by increases in client clearing. NTI increased 49%, partly reflecting a 5% year-on-year growth in average cash collateral and mostly following the effects of better investment returns with an increase in September as U.S. interest rates rose again. Post Trade Services in Italy saw a 4% reduction in total income. Clearing revenues increased following higher equities, repo and derivatives volumes, with offset from a decline in custody and settlement revenues which is largely the effect of netting T2S costs against revenue. Gross profit was up 3%.Turning to Capital Markets. Q3 revenue declined 8%, and by 7% on a constant currency basis. As stated earlier, without the IFRS 15 adjustment to Primary Markets, revenue would have been 2% higher year-on-year. In Secondary Markets, revenues were 1% higher in equities and up 6% for fixed income derivatives trading. And finally, Technology Services, here revenues increased 15% on a like-for-like basis at GBP 16 million.And let me just point out a few more things before I wrap up. We announced this morning that we are in a process to acquire up to a further 15.1% stake in LCH Group, which we expect will take our ownership to over 80%, and we expect to complete this before the end of Q4. This is the continuation of our strategy that has run over the last 12 months, as we are a natural buyer to anyone wanting to sell. Increasing our majority stake makes sound strategic and financial sense. It is accretive to earnings on completion and achieves a return on invested capital that is above our medium-term WACC. In sum, it reflects our continued confidence in LCH's opportunities for further growth as it develops its business. 14 minority shareholders remain invested and committed to the success of LCH. Open access and customer partnership approaches are unchanged, with banks fully part of the governance process as well as contributing to new product development and the extension of services. So we are happy to increase our holding in this valuable strategic asset.Our financial position remained strong with a good level of funding flexibility in place. As at 30th September of this year, the group had available committed facility headroom of circa GBP 500 million, having paid the interim dividend to shareholders and other normal-course payments. On a pro forma basis, including the acquisition of up to a further 15% stake in LCH for up to circa EUR 438 million, the group's net debt-to-EBITDA ratio would be towards the top end of our target leverage range, though normal, strong cash generation will bring leverage down again in 2019. So continued good strategic and financial momentum in the third quarter.And now I will turn it back to Paul.
Thank you, David. All right, we're going to go to Q&A now. [Operator Instructions] Okay, in that case, we'll go to the first question, please.
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Arnaud Giblat.
Could I ask 2 questions then? First on your leverage, you're indicating post the acquisition, if you get the 15% stake, you'll be towards the top end of your net debt-to-EBITDA. Does that mean you're probably going to wait a while to do another acquisition? Or for the right kind of deal, are you willing to go above that net debt-to-EBITDA target? And secondly on LCH and so on the OTC business, we've seen 3 quarters now where revenues have been broadly flat. Do -- how are you thinking about that growth there? What specifically should we be looking out for to start seeing growth resume sequentially? And so more specifically, is there a price renegotiation in the -- at TopCo coming up?
Right, okay. Let me take the first question and then I'll turn the second question to Paul. But I'll make a few comments on the OTCD arrangement first. And with respect to our leverage, as I said, we will be towards the top end of the range. We have said in the past, and nothing really changes, we are committed. And we have in the past and would continue to take that leverage above the top end of the range if there was a compelling transaction. So we would do that. We've got, we still have some flexibility here as we get to the top end of the range. I think the important part of our program will still be, as it is with the acquisition of the LCH stake, that with good, strong cash generation, we can bring the leverage down with a -- within a reasonable period of time back into the target range. There is nothing that we can -- are announcing with respect to the OTCD agreements, but as to the SwapClear growth, I think it has exhibited strong growth over a period. And I can turn it to Paul for more specifics.
Yes. Thanks, David. Arnaud, you're right. I mean it varies, and it has varied over a number of periods, as to exactly what level of growth you see from quarter to quarter. I mean it's still showing good year-on-year growth, obviously. Half the business in SwapClear line is from the client. The client business is very much driven by volumes on the market. So we've clearly seen a slower, naturally quieter Q3 period, the sort of summer period, so probably not surprising we're not seeing a big increase from that side. Longer term, of course we've been talking about the range of services in this area. So SwapClear is exhibiting very strong growth, but naturally that does start to slow down. We have been talking very much more about FX and the opportunity to grow there. We've launched the options at the start of Q3. So again, we ought to expect to see some pickup there in the OTC line going forward. Other initiatives, including things like SwapAgent, in time will also start feeding through to increase the growth in this line. So I think we're at a good point. The business is performing very much as we would expect it to be at this stage, but there's further growth opportunities as we move ahead.
Maybe if I can just follow up on one thing. On FX options, how many members do you have?
I think it was 6 paying members now on the options side. I think there's about 9 firms in total that are connected in there. So we'll begin to see a pickup now in the FX options. But it's still -- look, it's still very early days for that to be concerned.
We know from conversations with banks that they are -- they have been testing and they're in the process of connecting.
And your next question comes from the line of Philip Middleton.
Just one question then. I wondered if you could tell me a little bit about how you're thinking about the forthcoming negotiations about the U.K. leaving Europe given you're just buying 15% more of an asset, which does appear to be sensitive to that debate.
Yes. So I think we feel very confident in the business under any number of scenarios. And I think our commitment, represented by our purchase of further shares, is showing that support. I think it's also important that we have 14 minority shareholders, including 13 banks that are major customers of LCH. And they are remaining as shareholders of the business. And in a number of cases, those banks are also part of the OTCD network. So I think it -- as I said in my prepared remarks, I feel that it is a very good business. It's a strategic asset for us, and it's one that we feel good about making a further commitment to. With respect to Brexit overall, I'm not going to really comment on any of the ongoing negotiations, obviously, or try to predict an outcome. I think that we are encouraged by the recent meetings with regulators and central banks. We think there is a new urgency, obviously, about getting some solutions and some legal certainty in the very near future. And it's very clear that our customers want continuity of service, and they have made that increasingly clear. They've put their views on an increasingly clearer way through organizations such as FIA, ISDA and AFME. So Philip, back to the original part of your question: Very strong support for this. And it reflects our continued confidence in LCH under any range of outcomes.
And your next question comes from the line of Kyle Voigt.
I guess just one on the FTSE Russell business, just continued good growth there. Just given the recent pullback that we've seen in the FCM markets over the past month or so and just given the revenue mix has changed over the past few years for that business given the number of deals, can you just remind us the current percentage of that revenue line item that's market sensitive or that's being paid on AUM?
Yes, it's about -- it's been -- over time, it's been between 35% and 40%. It's right now about 35%. And that is split between tracking funds and ETFs. And there's also a portion that are licenses for traded derivatives products. So that's where it is. We don't generally break that down further, but I think the -- but that is basically the amount of our revenue right now that's volume sensitive.
And the -- I guess in your kind of medium-term target of achieving that 10% growth, is there a level of kind of market return that's assumed in that? And if so, could you please provide that?
There is definitely some -- there are clearly some assumptions in our targets, of course, but I think the important part about the business overall, and we're giving targets for the overall business, is that it's a very diversified business. 65% of the revenues comes from subscription revenues. And there is increasing demand for data and analytics as we continue to go through, as you know, the secular shift from active to passive. There's more demand for data and analytics and indexation and fixed income, so all areas where we have -- where we are well positioned for that growth. So I think the confidence in the target that we've put out and the fact that on a reported basis we're achieving 20% rise, I think that speaks to the diversity and mix of businesses within that business.
And your next question comes from the line of Chris Turner.
It's Chris Turner from Berenberg. Just one question for me then on your treasury income. That was very strong again this quarter. Can you kind of decompose that into how much of this strength was from changes in the way that you run that book? I see you've increased your value at risk substantially. You've termed out the duration of that book over time. And then how much of that this driven by just the conditions in the money markets in Q3 that might -- maybe being reverted in Q4?
Yes, Chris, most of it was from -- most of it, as I said in my prepared remarks, most of it was coming from the increase in U.S. dollar yields in anticipation of the Fed move, which occurred as you know in September. That happened again at the -- that happened at the beginning of the year, where we saw a strong NTI performance. I think we were saying that in the absence of that for Q3, you wouldn't expect to see NTI growth continue, but in fact we did have further upward actions within rates. And so I think that's what drives most of it. I think there is a small increase in the collateral. And Paul, would you add anything to that?
No. You're right, David, it's gone up about 5%. But Chris, look, there's no treasuries value at risk. And risk thresholds themselves haven't changed, so it's not being driven by any change of policy or approach. It's more about markets.
And your next question comes from the line of Martin Price.
Most of my questions have been answered actually, but I'm just wondering if you could share some thoughts on when you expect the shared services facilities to be fully operational and perhaps the magnitude of the savings that you might expect to accrue as a result. Any updated thoughts on cost guidance for next year would also be helpful.
Okay, I'm -- okay, I think I now understand your question. Look, we are continuing to be -- we're continuing to execute on that plan of changing and developing our business service centers. There's no update I would give on costs. This is a quarterly update; and as you know, we just give income -- revenue, income and gross profit. And those have achieved, as I said, within the LCH and FTSE Russells the double-digit growth. But there's no update on how we're progressing that I would say today on our continuing investment of the new operating model.
[Operator Instructions] And your next question comes from the line of Johannes Thormann.
Johannes Thormann, HSBC. One follow-up and one other question. First of all, on the outlook for treasury income, just to clarify, if we see another increase in Q4, this would imply, well, we should expect another uplift in net treasury income at LCH, is that correct? And secondly, regarding LCH SwapClear, there was this Bloomberg article around the termination of some clearing contracts on 29 December. If you could shed some color on and give more input on this. And probably also say, if we come to a worst-case Brexit, have you already applied for an IRS clearing license in Paris now?
Yes. So Johannes, I -- on the first part of your question, if -- again really consistent with what we were saying at the interims, if there really isn't any further rate moves, particularly in the U.S., you would not expect to see that continuing growth in NTI. So absent that I would think that for Q4 NTI would be probably in the low 40s. I think, with respect to the last part of your question, as we've said before we are committed to providing continuity of the existing service. Our customers do not want us to make an application to Paris. And so we continue to work with our customers to work through the Brexit situation and be in a position to provide a continuity of service. And as to the second part of your question...
Yes, on the termination of contracts, Johannes, I mean there's a public rulebook which people have seen, which gives a period of notice of 3 months on both sides, both from us to lenders and lenders back to us. But just to be clear, no notice has been served at all. And we're not at a point of time where we would need to do anything.
And the next question comes from the line of Anil Sharma.
It's Anil Sharma from Morgan Stanley. Just 2 questions, please. First on the indices business, has the sort of repricing on The Yield Book and Citi, that position, has that been done now? And so is that sort of in the numbers, or is there more to kind of come? And then on LCH, just to kind of, I guess follow up really, you talked about continuity of service, so what sort of conversations are you having with your banks? How are you actually going to provide that in a hard Brexit no-deal scenario? Because I guess if we rewind the clock sort of 18 months ago, there was I think maybe not direct quotes from yourselves but there was at least an indication that you could apply to Paris or other jurisdictions to get a license. So now that it sounds like that's not what you're going to do, what is the kind of contingency plan? And if you could just kind of quantify how much of EU-based clients are the volumes in SwapClear, that would be helpful.
Right, okay. So with respect to the first part of your question, the integration of yield book into the company continues to go well. The various changes that we are making to commercial policies are continuing. So some of them are reflected in the numbers now, in the reported numbers, but we're still in process of delivering all of the synergies that we announced, that we spoke of when we announced the transaction last year. With respect to the other part of your question, I'm not going to comment on them publicly on this call, but we are having discussions with banks on various contingency planning. But I won't -- I'm not going to -- those are really between LCH and the banks. And I'm not going to say anything more about that, other than to say that those discussions are -- have been ongoing. In terms of the impact, this continues to be a relatively small part of our total IRS clearing. As we've said before, most of this is U.S. dollar. The actual euro flows are about 25%. And the actual amount of euros that originate from EU entities is about 25% of that, so depending on how you count it, it's sort of in the 7% to 14% range. So it is a small part of a business and we have been saying that consistently over the last year, and nothing has really changed in terms of the various flows that we're seeing by currency in the SwapClear business.
Okay, sure. Can I just -- if you don't mind, just one quick follow-up. That's – so that's EU-based clients doing euro currency, but if you include all currencies from euro-based clients, what percentage would it be?
We haven't given that exact number.
We haven't...
Thank you. There are no further questions at the moment. Please continue.
Okay, great. That looks like we're through everyone's questions. So thanks very much for joining the call. We are around for the rest of the day, obviously, if you've got any more follow-up questions, but otherwise we'll finish things now. Thanks very much.
Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude our conference for today. Thank you all for participating. You may now disconnect.