Hammerson PLC
LSE:HMSO
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
|
US |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
246.4586
322.45
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches GBX.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US | |
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US | |
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US | |
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US | |
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
So,
hello,
everybody.
Good
morning.
Welcome
to
Hammerson's
2021
Full
Year
Results
and
my
first
full
year
with
the
company.
It's
great
to
be
able
to
welcome
some
of
you
in
person
this
morning.
This
time
last
year,
we
were
all
in
lockdown.
While
we
are
now
learning
to
live
with
COVID,
we're
aware,
however,
of
the
terrible
events
taking
place
in
Ukraine
and
we'll
be
following
this
closely.
Let me
run
through
our
agenda.
I
will
start
by
giving
you
an
overview
of
our
2021
priorities
and
achievements.
Himanshu
will
take
you
through
the
financials.
I
will
then
give
you
more
detail
on
our
operational
and
strategic
progress,
finishing
with
our
focus
on
the
future.
Let
me
start
with
what
we
said.
We
always
said
that
2021
was
going
to
be
a
challenging
year
and
a
year
of
change.
This
time
last
year,
I
set
out
our
priorities
and
agenda
for
the
years
to
come.
We
announced
a
review
of
our
strategy,
portfolio
and
operating
model,
while
at
the
same
time,
recognizing
the
need
to
strengthen
our
balance
sheet.
So,
what
did
we
do?
As
you
can
see
here
on
this
slide,
it
was
a
year
of
two-halves.
In
the
first
half
of
the
year,
we
focused
on
addressing
the
immediate
challenges.
Those
were
stabilizing
and
derisking
the
balance
sheet,
which
was
exacerbated
by
the
pandemic.
We
disposed
of
403
noncore
assets
and
refinanced
around
ÂŁ940
million
of
debt.
This
includes
the
issuance
of
a
sustainably –
of
our
first sustainability-linked
bond.
We
concluded
a
strategic
and
organizational
review
that
clearly
identified
our
unique
position
and
the
important
value
creation
opportunities
within
our
prime
urban
estates
and
land
bank.
To
do
all
this,
it
was
clear,
however,
that
we
needed
radical
change
in
our
portfolio,
in
our
platform,
in
our
focus,
and
in
our
leadership.
The
second
half
of
the
year
was
all
about
execution.
So,
regaining
lost
ground
and
laying
strong
foundations
for
future
value
creation.
So, here's
what
we
did.
We
established
a
clear
path
to
execute
our
strategic
focus
underpinned
by
stronger
financial
discipline.
We
introduced
a
new
asset-centric,
customer-focused
model
across
the
business,
and
by
doing
so,
removed
layers
to
create
a
flatter,
leaner
organization.
We
disposed
of
a
further
ÂŁ30
million
of
UK
noncore
assets,
simplifying
and
cleaning
up
our
portfolio
and
exchanged
our
share
of
Silverburn
for
ÂŁ70
million.
Just
last
week,
we
completed
the
sale
of
Victoria
Leeds
for
ÂŁ120
million.
That
gives
a
total
of
ÂŁ620
million
since
I
arrived.
We
also
began
repositioning
our
core
assets,
actively
leasing
up
and
injecting
placemaking.
Last
but
not
least,
we
are
accelerating
plans
to
take
forward
our
development
sites.
So,
it's
clear
that
we
have
delivered
against
what
we
said,
but
we
know
there
is
more
to
do
and
significantly
more
opportunity
ahead.
Under
the
new
leadership,
a
lot
has
changed
at
Hammerson.
On
this
slide,
you
will
see
our
approach
to
disciplined
financial
management,
which
underpins
everything
we
do.
This
year
has
been
– we
have
seen
a
relentless
focus
on,
first
of
all,
realigning
our
portfolio.
Secondly,
on
leasing,
we
revised
leasing
policies
and
processes,
creating
better
data
to
drive
improved
performance,
speed
to
market,
and
cash.
Thirdly,
we
focus
on
cash
collections
with
daily
reporting
and
updates.
Four,
on
reducing
our
cost
base
through
our
route
and
branch
review
of
the
organization.
Fifth
point
is
on
our
approach
to
capital
allocation,
thinking
about
it
with
disciplined
underwriting
and
decisional
processes.
The
last
two
points
are
all
about
debt
management
and
maintaining
a
resilient
and
sustainable
capital
structure
throughout
the
cycle.
I'm
pleased
to
say
that
last
month,
we
secured
a
stable
investment
grade
credit
rating
reaffirmed
by
Moody's
as
a
result
of
all
this
work.
This
disciplined
financial
delivery
has
already
had
an
impact
on
our
financial
results,
which
Himanshu
will
now
walk
you
through.
Himanshu?
Thank
you,
Rita-Rose,
and
good
morning
and
thank
you
again
for
joining
us
here
at
Kings
Place
this
morning
and
of
course,
on
the
webcast.
I
also
have been
at
Hammerson
for
nearly
a
year
now.
As
Rita-Rose
said,
it's
been
a
year
of
profound
change
during
which
we've
made
significant
financial
and
operational
progress.
You
can
see
the
highlights
here. NRI
was
ÂŁ190
million,
up
12%
year-on-year.
Like-for-like
NRI
was
up
22%
year-on-year,
driven
by
stronger
rent
collections,
lower
bad
debt
charges,
and
increased
variable
income
from
turnover
rent,
car
parks
and
commercialization.
Rent
collections
for
2021
are
currently
at
90%
and
2020
collections
are
at
99%.
And-year-to
date,
collections
were
83%
for
2022.
And
consistent
with
what
I
said
at
the
half
year,
we
did
not
grant
any
material
concessions
in
the
second
half.
Adjusted
earnings
were
ÂŁ81
million,
up
122%
on
2020,
benefiting
from
the
improvement
in
net
rental
income,
a
strong
recovery
at
Value
Retail,
and
the
lower
financing
costs
from
refinancing
and
our
debt
reduction.
Our
managed portfolio
is
valued
at
ÂŁ3.5
billion,
down
21%.
And
when
you
look
at
that,
around
half
that
was
[indiscernible]
(00:07:00)
disposals,
benefiting
net
debt,
of
course,
and
about
half
from
valuations.
The
valuations
in
the
second
half
were
down
only
3%.
We
have
made substantial
progress
in
reducing
debt
and
strengthening
the balance
sheet. The net
debt
at
the
year-end
was
ÂŁ1.8
billion,
19%
lower
and
LTV
is
39%
headline
and
47%
on
fully
proportionally
consolidated
basis.
Now,
let's
look
at
the
rest
of
the
numbers
in
a
bit
more
detail.
I
covered
the
headlines
already
so
additionally
[ph]
go
out
(00:07:37) on
the
slide. Premium
outlets
bounced
back
strongly
from
COVID
with
earnings
up
130%
year-on-year
up
ÂŁ15.9
million
compared
with
ÂŁ7 million
in
2020.
And
remember in
the
prior
year,
we
had
a
positive
ÂŁ14 million
earnings
contribution from
VIA
Outlets
we
disposed
of
in
October.
So,
Value
Retail
[indiscernible]
(00:07:59)
and
I'll
return
to
Value
Retail
in
more
detail
later.
The
IFRS loss
is
ÂŁ429
million,
the
key
driver
being
revaluation
losses,
which
has
slowed
in
H2
as
yields
began
to
stabilize.
NTA
per
share
was
down
22%
from
ÂŁ0.82
to
ÂŁ0.64.
Now,
to
the
adjusted
earnings
walk from
ÂŁ36.5
million
to
ÂŁ81
million
in
a
bit
more
detail.
As
you'd
expect,
NRI
is
up
ÂŁ33.1
million
and
that
was
the
largest
element
with
growth
from
our
flagships
of
ÂŁ25
million
and
a
further
ÂŁ11
million
from
our
developments
in
other
portfolio.
During
the
year,
we
benefited
from
ÂŁ17
million
of
one-offs
around
the
premiums
year-on-year.
And
most
of
that
space
either had
been
re-let
or
was
part
of
our
repurposing
plans.
Interest
was
better
by
nearly
ÂŁ24
million
year-on-year,
benefiting
from
the
disposal
program
from
debt
reduction
and
refinancing
from
our
sustainability-linked
bond
and
our
RCF.
And
as
already
explained,
Value
Retail
had a recovery
of
ÂŁ23
million.
Whilst
our
gross
admin
costs
posted
a
net
increase
of
ÂŁ3.9
million,
we've
done
a
lot
on
cost
during
the
year,
which
Rita-Rose
has
already
referenced,
and
the
key
message
here
is
there
remains
more
to
do.
The
effects
of
the
disposals
of
the
retail
parks
portfolio
and
the
French
assets
in
H1
2021
and
VIA
in
late
2020
of ÂŁ27
million
completes
the
adjusted
earnings
walk of
ÂŁ81
million.
And
just
before
I
leave
this
slide, after
effect
of the
2021 disposals
and
surrender
premiums,
underlying
earnings
are
around
ÂŁ52
million,
and
this
ÂŁ52 million
acts
as
your
reference
point
for
2022.
Now,
let's
turn
to
the
balance
sheet
and
review the
NTA
per
share
walk.
The
key
takeaway
on
this
slide
is
that the
second
half
saw
a
more
modest
decline
of
ÂŁ0.05,
ÂŁ0.02
from
the
H2
revaluation
deficit
and
ÂŁ0.04
from
the
scrip
dividend,
offset
by
ÂŁ0.01
of
earnings.
The
total
dilution
from
the
scrip
was
therefore
ÂŁ0.07
per
share
in
the
year.
Now,
turning
to
our
portfolio
valuations.
Going
from
left
to
right,
this
slide
shows
the
portfolio
summary
and
capital
returns.
On
the
left-hand
side,
the
yield
in
the
ERV
impact,
and
the
total
property
return
in
the
middle.
And
on
the
right-hand
side,
the
net
equivalent
and
the
net
initial
yield
ranges.
Again,
the
key
takeaway
is
the
contrast
in
performance
between
the
full
year
and
the
second
half.
Our
managed
portfolio
of
ÂŁ3.5
billion
saw
a
double-digit
decline
of
11.3%
for
the
full
year,
but
only
2.4%
in
the
second
half,
and
it
was
good
to
see
yields
beginning
to
stabilize
in
the
second
half.
The
downward
pressure
on
ERVs also
began
to
abate
in
the
second
half,
down
only
2.5%.
And
this
was
underpinned
by
stronger
second
half
leasing
performance,
which
Rita-Rose
will
cover
momentarily
in
more
detail.
The
total
property
return
for
the
year
on
our
managed
portfolio
was
therefore
minus
6.7%
and
a
minus
3.9%,
including
Value
Retail.
On
the
net
equivalent
yields,
we
are
seeing
liquidity
returning
to
the
retail
investment
markets.
And
to
that
end,
our
assets
are
well
positioned
to
benefit
from
our
investment
in
reinvigorating
and
repurposing
our
existing
space.
And
the
valuations
on
our
Value
Retail
investment
remain
resilient.
Let
me
now
just
break
down
the
flagship
capital
returns
by
geography.
So,
the
minus
11.6%,
this
slide
shows
the
breakdowns
by
half
year
of
the
capital
returns,
giving
you
a
little
more color
around
the
trajectory
over
the
last
four
years.
As
you
can
see
from
the
pink
and
red
bars,
2020
was
the
worst
performing
year
due
to
the
impact
of
COVID-19.
But
by
the
time
we
get
to
H2
2021,
the
dark
blue
bar
on
the
right-hand
side,
the
rate
of
decline
in
capital
returns
has
markedly
slowed
in
each
of
the
three
territories.
I'm
taking
each
of
those
in
turn.
UK
capital
returns
were
down
16.7%
with
a
slowdown in
the
second
half,
helped
by
the
emergence
of
some
transactional
evidence.
From
the
peak,
UK
flagships
have
declined
by
62%
and
seen
an
ERV
decline
of
31%.
Net
equivalent
yields
in
the
UK
have
expanded
290
basis
points
to
7.7%.
In
France
and
Ireland,
the
rate
of
decline
from
peak
valuations
has
been
less
significant
than
the
UK,
particularly
on
ERV, reflecting
the
more
benign
occupational
markets
and
strong
leasing
performances.
The
net
equivalent
yields
in
France
and
Ireland
are
therefore
at
5%
and
5.3%,
respectively and feel
prudently
valued
when
compared
with some
of
our
European
peers.
Have
we
turned
the
corner?
There's
certainly an
emerging
consensus
that
yields
are
beginning
to
bottom
out
and
our
negative
reversion
is
modest
in
absolute
terms.
I
said
I'll
come back
to
Value
Retail
in
more
detail,
so
first,
to
the
Value
Retail
P&L.
Keying
off
from
the
loss
of
ÂŁ7.1
million
from
Value
Retail,
GRI
improved
by
ÂŁ26.4
million
in
2021.
I
remember
this
is
against
the
backdrop
of
all
the
villages
being
closed
and
minimal
rent
collected
in
the
first
quarter
of
the
year.
And
you'll
recall
that
Value
Retail
rents
are
largely
turnover
based,
and
we
saw
the
benefits
of
this
coming
through
in
the
numbers
with
stronger
brand
sales
and
footfall
as
villages
were
able
to
operate
with
fewer
to
no
restrictions.
The
villages
signed
288
leases
in
2021,
collection
rates
were
around
99%
and
occupancy
continues
to
be
around
96%.
Value
Retail
also
successfully
launched
a
wide
range
of
initiatives
aimed
at
their
domestic
audience,
including
virtual
shopping,
on
a
click-and-collect
basis.
And
these
initiatives
have
gone
some
way
to
mitigate
the
absence
of
tax
free
sales
resulting
in improved
spend
per
visit
year-on-year.
And
Value
Retail
also
showed
good
cost
discipline
as
property
operating
costs
increased
by
only
ÂŁ3.3
million
year-on-year.
We
do
anticipate
a
continued
recovery
in
Value
Retail
in
2022,
particularly
as
they
expect
the
initial
return
of
the
international
traveler
in
the
second
half
of
2022
ahead
of
a
fuller
recovery
in
2023.
Let
me
now
turn
to
the
valuations
of
the
Value
Retail
portfolio
and
their
relationship
to
yield
and
density.
This
chart on
the
left
maps
each
village
by
sales
density
and
exit
yield
with
the
size
of
the
bubbles
reflecting
the
valuation.
The
sales
density
shown
here,
of
course,
is
2021,
which
is
a
reference
point
reflects
a
subdued
trading
due
to
periods
of
closure.
And
Bicester Village
stands
out
by
virtue
of
its
size,
followed
by
La
Vallée.
And
together,
these
account
for
approximately
60%
of
our
ÂŁ1.9
billion
investment
in
Value
Retail.
There are
also
the
more
mature
villages
and
that
is
reflected
in
the
higher
sales
density.
The
less
mature
villages
such
as
Maasmechelen
and
Fidenza
are
at
the
lower
end
of
the
spectrum
in
terms
of
exit
yield,
sales
density
and
corresponding
valuation,
but
have performed
strongly
as
is
Kildare,
which
was
expanded
during
the
year.
Value
Retail
operates
very
much
at
the
premium
end
of
the
outlets
segment,
with
net initial
yields
of
4%
and
7%
and
an exit
yield
range
of
5%
to
6%
using
the
discount
rate
shown
here.
And
there
have
been
a
couple
of
transaction
reference
points
in
2021
which
support
these
valuations.
We've,
of
course,
seen
the
first
completed
sale
since
2019
of
outlets,
that's
Outlet
Aubonne
in
Switzerland
at a
7%
yield.
And
in
the
UK,
Bridgend
Designer
Outlet
and
UK
Outlet
Mall
are
also
currently
under
offer.
The
latter,
believes
to
be
a
reported
blended
yield
of
6%.
And
more
recently,
Quintain,
a
market
in
their
London
outlet
at Wembley,
with
a
reported
net
initial
yield
of
6%.
And
finally,
before
I
leave
Value
Retail,
they
have
made
good
progress
on
their
refinancings,
with
two
loans
refinanced
and
upsized
since
the
beginning
of
2021.
They
are
in
the
advanced
stages
of
the
refinancing
of
La
Vallée
and
expect
to
refinance
Bicester
in
the
ordinary
course
during
2022.
Now,
let's
turn
to
the
strengthening
of
our
balance
sheet.
I've
already
said
we've
made
significant
progress
in
bringing
down
net
debt
and
reported
net
debt
at
ÂŁ1.8 billion
was
19%
lower
with
pro
forma
net
debt
starting
at
ÂŁ1.6
billion
following
the
sale
of
Victoria
Leeds,
and
the
exchange
of
Silverburn.
We
have
strong
liquidity,
ÂŁ1.7
billion
pro
forma, and
we
have
no
material
refinancing
until
2025,
not
covered
by
existing
cash
and
liquidity.
And
Rita-Rose
has mentioned
testament
to
our
progress. It
was
great
to
see
Moody's
recently
reaffirming
our
IG
credit
rating
and
removing
the
negative
outlook
to
stable.
And
turning
to
the
cost
base,
a
key
focus
in
the
second
half
was
to
reset
the
organization
and,
of
course,
following
due
an
appropriate
consultation,
reduce
the
head
count
by
18%.
We
retendered
and
reduced
our
insurance
premiums
by
64%.
And
we
saw
some
in-year
savings
in
payroll
costs,
but
these
were
offset
by
the
return
to
normalized
levels
of
variable
pay
following
minimal
payouts
in
the
2020
pandemic
here.
As
we
look
forward,
we
continue
to
review
our
organization
to
make
sure
we
have
the
right
skills
and
talent,
and
that
we
also
rightsize
for
the
effects
of
disposals.
And
for
those
of
you
physically
here
today,
we
of
course,
are
looking
to
rightsize
the
office
space and
there'll
be
further
opportunities
to
reduce
costs
as
we
simplify
and
automate.
And
this
will
drive
to
a
leaner
and
more
agile
company
for
the
future.
So,
to
my
final
slide,
let
me
close
by
giving
you
some
guidance
on
modeling
assumptions.
You'll
see
the
different
elements
of
the
very
detailed
guidance on here.
And
we've
provided
you
with
the
starting
GRI
stripped
of
disposals and
surrenders,
including
Silverburn
and
Leeds
and
that
rebased
GRI
is
ÂŁ193
million.
If
you
take
each
of
the
components
from
disposal
through
to
finance
costs,
you
have
all
the
elements
that
give
you
the
drop
through
to
adjusted
earnings.
The
key
variable,
of
course,
will
be
the
magnitude,
timing,
and
exit
yield
on
disposals.
On
CapEx,
we
expect
2022
CapEx
of
around
ÂŁ125
million,
balanced
between
the
reinvestment
and
repurposing,
in
placemaking,
and
in
stewardship,
stewardship
being
a
reference
to
the
need
in
some
of
our
assets
to
put
in
CapEx
to
make
up
for
underinvestment
in
previous
years.
Rita-Rose
already
talked
about
our
disciplined
approach
in
financial
management,
and
that
will
certainly
entail
in
our
deployment
of
capital.
And
finally
to
dividends,
we
continue
to
cover
our
outstanding
REIT
and
SIIC
obligations
for
our
scrip
dividend
in
2022
before
intending
to
return
to
cash
dividends
from
2023
onwards.
With
that,
let
me
hand
back
to
Rita-Rose.
Thanks, Himanshu.
So,
let
me
start
quickly
with
who
we
are
and
what
drives
us.
So,
we
are
an
owner,
operator,
and
developer
of
sustainable
prime
urban
real
estate.
Our
competitive
advantage
is
our
core
assets,
which
have
a
unique
city
center
footprint
illustrated
by
the
map
you
can
see
on
this
slide.
250
million
people
pass
through
our
assets
every
year. We support
more
than
40,000
jobs,
so
we
play
an
essential
role
in
our
communities.
Today,
that
portfolio
remains
focused
on
traditional
uses.
We
are
now
executing
against
a
clear
strategy
to
reposition
our
prime
urban
estates.
You
can
see
this
on
the
right
of
the
slide.
My
experience
from
other
international
markets
inspire
me
when
I
think
about
the
future
of
our
destinations,
a
more
asset-focused
mindset
and
a
broader
mix
of
uses
adapted
to
reflect
the
demands
of
the
cities,
neighborhoods,
and
the
communities
they
serve.
So,
this
is
a
real
opportunity
for
us
and
it's
already
happening.
At
the
half
year
we
set
out
our
strategy
to
unlock
value,
which
you
can
see
on
the
left
of
this
slide.
It
comprises
of
four
key
elements;
reinvigorating
our
assets,
accelerating
development,
creating
an
agile
platform,
and
delivering
a
sustainable
and
resilient
capital
structure.
On
the
right
of
the
slide,
you
can
see
our
near-term
opportunities,
which
include
maximizing
cash
flow
off
the
existing
asset
footprint
by
repositioning
and
filling
space.
Second,
generating
capital
to
reduce
net
debt
and
reinvest.
Third,
increasing
organizational
speed
and
efficiency,
also
further
reducing
costs.
And
fourth,
creating
value
and
optionality
in
the
land
bank
by
hitting
early
milestones.
In
the
medium
to
long
term,
we
will create value
through
the combination
of
our existing
assets footprint
and
adjoining
sites.
Our
ambition
is
to
deliver
a
total
return
via
a
sustainable
cash
dividend
and
capital
appreciation.
Turning
to
the
first
of
those
key
elements,
reinvigorating
our
assets,
we
have
had
a
strong
year
on
leasing.
Before
I
cover
that,
let
me
show
you
the
recovery
of
footfall
and
spend.
On
the
left-hand
side,
you
can
see
the
significant
uplift
in
footfall
following
the
relaxation
of
COVID
restrictions.
In
our
core
assets,
we
have
seen
footfall
increase
above
2019.
Spend
per
visit
has
also
remained
high
with
sales
recovering
almost
to
2019
levels.
As
sales
have
recovered
and
rental
levels
rebased,
occupancy
costs
are
now
affordable.
This
slide
shows
our
higher
leasing
volumes
and
improved
matrix,
particularly
in
H2.
Let
me
walk
you
through
a
few
data
points.
We
signed
a
total
of
371
leases
in
2021.
So,
it's
around
equivalent
of
20%
of
the
portfolio,
70%
up
on
2020.
This
represented
2.9
million
square
feet
of
space
by
value.
This
was
ÂŁ25
million
at
our
share,
150%
up
on
2020.
Principal
leases
represented
71%
of
deals
and
94%
of
volume.
Net
effective
rent
for
principal
deals
was
11%
below
ERV
but
with
a
clear
improvement
to
minus
5%
in
the
second
half.
Overall,
headline
rent
was
broadly
in
line
with
previous
passing.
There
is
a
breakdown
by
country
in
the
additional
disclosures.
In
summary,
the
UK
remains
the
most
challenging
and
fast-moving
market.
But
even
there,
one-third
of
deals
were
above
ERV
and
41%
were
above
passing
rent.
France
continues
to
exhibit
stability
and
growth
and
the
Irish
market
is
strong.
But
this
year,
it's
skewed
by
a
small
sample.
As
we
continue
to
execute
our
strategy
to
actively
lease-up
and
increase
vibrancy,
we
are
targeting
now
a
broader
mix
and
saw
69%
of
leases
to
non-fashion
this
year.
For
fashion,
we
remain
focused
on
best-in-class
brands.
We
also
continue
to
use
temporary
leasing,
particularly
to
bridge
periods
between
deals,
keep
options
open,
or
try
out
new
concepts.
These
remain
at
a
steep
discount
across
the
portfolio
but
are
cash
accretive.
We
indeed
saved
around
ÂŁ6.5
million
of void
costs
on
an
annual
basis
this
year.
As
for
vacancy,
this
has
reduced
from
7%
at
the
half
year
to
4.5%.
Momentum
continues
to
build
with
data
in
2022
showing
that
January
and
February
our
volume
of
leases
is
up
and
rents
are
now
in
line
with
ERV
and
ahead
of
passing
rent,
which
is
a
KPI
we
follow
closely,
which
I
call
internally
the
cash-on-cash.
So,
those
were
the
numbers.
On
the
following
slide,
I
want
to
talk
to
you
a
bit
about
what
it
looks
like
on
the
ground
with
a
samples
of
our
occupiers.
Our
leasing
activity
in
2021
is
roughly
grouped
into
six
leasing
themes,
which
you
can
see
on
the
left-hand
side.
For
asset
management,
we
engage
proactively
and
at
a
portfolio
level.
Next,
in
response
to
the
changing
landscape,
we
are
doing
big
box
repurposing
and
introducing
a
wider
mix
of
F&B,
leisure,
and
non-traditional
uses
to
these
spaces.
Commercialization
and
events
also
play
an
important
role
in
cash
flow,
creating
vibrancy,
and
we
trial
new
concepts.
I
could
talk
to
you
all
day
about
all
the
examples
on
this
slide,
we
had
a
lot.
In
the
interest
of
time,
I
will
stop
on
to
great
examples
that
cover
a
number
of
these
themes,
Goldsmiths
and
Brown
Thomas.
Goldsmiths
wanted
to
upsize
in
the
Bullring.
We
proactively
engaged
at
the
C-suite
level
to
gain
a
better
understanding
of
their
needs.
Today,
Goldsmiths
occupy
a
total
of
14
units
across
the
portfolio,
making
them
a
top
20
occupier
and
partner.
We
also
opened
Brown
Thomas
in
Dundrum
in
Ireland
last
week
in
the
House
of
Fraser
vacant
space.
This
62,000-square-feet
beauty
hall
and
lifestyle
brand
features
the
apartment,
a
lounge
for
luxury
shoppers,
and
a
range
of
other
innovations
such
as
vitamin
injections,
designer
handbag
exchange,
glad
rags
rentals,
etcetera.
Penneys
takes
over
the
remaining
floors,
making
this
an
exciting
and
innovative
retail
experience.
As
we
execute
our
strategy,
we
need
to
realign
obviously
our
portfolio
and
generate
capital.
On
this
slide,
I
will
take
you
through
our
disciplined
disposal
program.
As
we continue
to
follow
the
plan
set
out
at
half
year,
you
can
see
on
the
left-hand
side
of
this
slide
the
sales
in
2021
and
early
2022,
bringing
us
to
ÂŁ623
million
of
disposals.
On
the
right,
we
have
our
two
buckets
of
disposal
candidates
with
both
in
the
near term
and
in
the
medium term.
Sales
will
depend
on
both
pricing
and
market
conditions.
We
anticipate
at
least
a
total
of
ÂŁ500
million
by
end
of
2023,
and
that
includes
Victoria
Leeds
and
Silverburn.
Having
said
that,
you
will
see
on
the
next
slide
how
we
think
about
capital
allocation.
Today,
we
are
still
focused
on
reducing
in
total
absolute
indebtedness.
We
have
a
total
return
philosophy.
But
as
a
REIT, we
must
keep
or
meet
our
payout
obligations.
We
also
have
a
clear
intent
to
return
to
a
cash
dividend
once
our
SIIC
obligations
are
met,
and
that
was
covered
by
Himanshu's
guidance.
Next,
mindful
of
our
relatively
high
cost
of
capital,
we
will
look
continuously
at
our
capital
structure,
and
Himanshu
is
all
over
that.
Organic
investment
in
our
existing
core
assets
and
land
bank
means
we
could
consider
consolidating
our
core
assets
[ph]
and
markets (00:31:18).
We
remain
[indiscernible]
(00:31:20) the
opportunity
for
exceptional
[ph]
returns
arise (00:31:23).
Turning
to
creating
the
agile
platform,
which
is
another
key
element
of
our
strategy,
I
mentioned
at
the
start
that
we
have
enhanced
the
leadership
team.
You
can
see
on
the
left-hand
side
of
the
slide
the
new
skills
and
insights
that
supplement
our
existing
talent
within
the
business.
The
shape
of
the
leadership
and
[ph]
colleague
team
(00:31:48)
will
continue
to
evolve
as
we
realign
the
portfolio
requiring
new
skills.
It
has
not
only
been
about
getting
the
right
team
in
place
of
course,
but
making
sure
the
right
governance
structures
are
there
to
empower
and
support
colleagues
and
to
drive
a
high-performance
culture.
When
I
arrived,
decision-making
was
spread
across
more
than
30
committees,
and
today
we
concentrate
on
three.
Hammerson
was
at
an
inflection
point
when
I
arrived,
and
we
needed
to
reset
the
organization
to
be
more
efficient
and
effective.
I've
said
that
at the
half
year.
The
most
material
change
that's
derived
from
our
review
was
the
shift
from
a
geographic
silo
structure
to
an
asset-centric
and
customer-focused
operating
model.
This
new
structure
also
delivers
a
more
empowered
organization,
which
is
closer
to
our
assets
and
occupiers.
In
the
near
term,
we
are also
focusing
on
simplifying
and
automating
key
processes
to
improve
that
speed-to-market,
increase
efficiency,
and
speed
to
cash.
Staying
with
our
four
strategic
elements,
I
will
now
turn
to
accelerating
development.
Most
of
you
are
aware
of
the
opportunity
set
in
the
portfolio,
and
there
is
the
usual
slide
in
the
additional
disclosures
showing
the
potential
mix
of
uses.
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
sense
of
what
stage
we
are
at
with
each
of
these
projects
on
this
slide.
Today,
the
land
promotion
portfolio
can
be
divided
into
three
buckets.
First,
our
four
near-term
projects,
and
that
is
Dublin
Central,
The
Goodsyard,
Martineau
Galleries,
and
Grand
Central.
These
are
either
well
advanced
on
detailed
planning
or
will
be
able
to
be
advanced
rapidly.
Progressing
these
projects
in
the
near term
to
a
point
where
they
are
ready-to-go
development
opportunities
will
create
significant
short-term
value
and
optionality
as
to
how
we
take
them
forward
and/or
look
for
liquidity
or
deliver
partnerships.
Next
are
the
medium-term
projects,
which
are
largely
at
the
feasibility
or master
planning
stages.
Therefore,
more
midterm
prospects
in
terms
of
value
creation
and
liquidity
as
we
define
the
appropriate
project
and
phasing
to maximize
value.
Finally,
we
have
a
longer
term
strategic
project,
which
is
in
Ireland.
Let
me
show
you
a
bit
more
detail
on
the
four
near-term
land
promotion
projects.
These
have
potential
to
be
on site
as
early
as
2023, 2024.
On
the
left
of
this,
you
can
see
the
milestones
we
achieved
in
2021
and
what
you
should
look
out
for
in
2022
and
2023.
There's
a
lot
going
on
here.
But
the
key
message
is
that
this
is
relatively
capital-light
activity,
a
total
of
around
ÂŁ73
million
over
the
next
two
years.
And
you
can
see
from
the
right-hand
side
that
this
delivers
an
immediate
valuation
uplift
of
approaching
ÂŁ110 in
that
period.
There
is
of
course
a
very
significant
long-term
opportunity
on
top
of
that
with
potential
GDV
of
more
than
ÂŁ2.5
billion
at
our
share.
But
the
near-term
work
gives
us
optionality
to
select
the
best
returns
for
the
shareholders.
Let
me
talk
now
a
few
minutes
about
sustainability,
which
is
a
key
focus
of
the
company
and
underpins
everything
we
do.
It's
a
very
important
topic
whether
we
are
thinking
about
embedded
carbon
in
future
developments
or
the
existing
emissions
footprint
to-date.
Hammerson
has
a
long-standing
and
recognized
commitment
to
sustainability.
Since
the
launch
of
our
goals
in
2015,
we
have
reduced
our
carbon
emissions
by
68%.
We've
already
talked
about
the
sector-first
sustainability-linked
bond
we
issued.
So,
let
me
pull
out
two
other
highlights,
expanding
renewable
energy
across
the
portfolio
this
year.
In
France,
we
connected
Terrasses
du
Port to
the
Thassalia
geothermical
(sic) [geothermal] system
for
heating
and
cooling.
We
also
installed
the
new
PV
array
at
Dundrum
in
Ireland.
Looking
ahead,
we
are
in
good
shape
to
meet
our
targets.
We
are
already
2023
compliant
with
EPC ratings
of
E
or
above.
We
estimate
the
total
cost
of
works
to
get
to
B EPC
ratings
at
ÂŁ35
million
to
ÂŁ50 million
spread
over
the
portfolio
as
is
across
eight
years
at
our
share.
Before
concluding,
I
wanted
to
show
you
how
we
bring
strategy
to
life,
and
Birmingham
is
a
great
example.
In
Birmingham,
three
assets
are
becoming
a
prime
urban
estate.
This
shows
you
the
near-term
opportunity
we
have
in
real
life.
Today,
you
can
see
Bullring
and
Grand
Central
in
the
middle
and
to
the
left.
A
marquee
project
on
this
journey
is
the
repositioning
of
a
former
department
store
space
to
a
flagship
grocery-led
offer
and
a
competitive
sports-led
leisure
concept.
This
will
be
in
place
by
early
2023.
We
are
in
early
stages
of
engagement
on
the
remaining
floor
for
another
new
leisure
concept.
This
is
about
revitalizing
interest
in
this
end
of
the
Bullring
for
both
existing
and
new
occupiers.
We
are
very
excited
about
the
leasing
pipeline
we
are
actually
seeing.
At
Grand
Central,
we
have
another
great
opportunity
to
repurpose
the
former
JLP
space.
And
at
Ladywood
House,
repurposing
will
see
a
modern
workspace-led
asset.
These
two
important
projects
sit
astride
New
Street
station,
the
main
commuting
hub
for
the
West
Midlands,
which
sees
almost
50
million
people
in
transit
in
an
average
year.
To
the
right
of
the
picture,
a
stone's
throw
away,
you
can
see
Martineau
Galleries.
Today,
this
site
is
a
collection
of
yielding
secondary
and
tertiary
assets.
Next
to
where
the
Curzon
Street
HS2
station
is
being
constructed,
it
has
tremendous
potential
as
a
residential
and
workspace
scheme
in
the
medium
to
long
term.
Linking
this
back
to
our
longer
term
strategy,
when
we
think
about
the
future
of
our
exposure
to
the
city,
we
think
about
Birmingham
estate,
not
about
three
separate
assets.
Taking
this
up
to
the
portfolio
level
now
and
to
give you
a
picture
of
our
aspirations,
by
bringing
together
the
near-term
repositioning
and
longer-term
opportunities,
you
create
a
clear
link
and
pass
the
significant
value
for
the
future.
On
the
left-hand
side,
you
see
the
shape
of
the
managed
portfolio
to-date
by
value.
Delivering
on
those
near-term
opportunities
brings
you
to
the
chart
in
the
middle.
A
stronger
balance
sheet,
reducing
debt,
and
recycling
into
our
existing
assets
and
land,
higher
quality
earnings
and
a
sustainable
dividend
stream,
further
repositioning
of
the
portfolio,
and
some
valuation
uplift
from
hitting
those
early
land
promotion
milestones.
On
the
right-hand
side,
you
can
see
the
indicative
shape
of
the
portfolio
in
five
years
or
so.
And
that's
a
fully
realigned
portfolio,
repositioning
of
those
assets
completed,
further
underpinning
the
earnings
and
the
blend
of
active
phased
development
to
core,
and
further
land
promotion
activity
is
possible.
During
this
journey
from
left
to
right,
we
will
create
absolute
optionality
about
which
opportunities
to
pursue
for
best
returns
for
the
shareholders.
There
remains
obviously
a
significant
earnings
and
capital
growth
opportunity
in
the
future.
To
my
closing
remarks,
under
new
leadership
we
have
addressed
our
immediate
priorities
and
delivered
on
our
early
milestones.
I
do
believe
Hammerson
has
turned
the
corner,
but
we
realized
and
recognized
we
have
more
to
do
and
that
we
continue
to
operate
in
a
challenging
market.
We
have
the
right
[audio gap]
(00:41:27), a
robust
strategy,
[audio gap]
(00:41:29)
and
operating
model.
Our
focus
is
relentlessly
on
reducing
vacancy
and
void
costs,
repurposing
space,
delivering
a
mix
that
occupiers
and
customers
demand,
and
unlocking
value
from
the
development
opportunities
in
the
portfolio.
As
we
continue
to
execute
our
strategy,
we
will
build
a
stronger
business
and
one
that
delivers
value
for
shareholders.
So,
thank
you
for
your
time
today.
I
will
now
open
to
the
floor
and
the
lines
are
also
open
for
questions.
Josh
will
be
taking
the
questions
online.
If
you
are
in
the
room,
please
raise
your
hand
and
there
is
a
microphone
that
will
come
to
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Chris.
Hi.
Hi.
Good
morning.
This
is
Chris
Fremantle
from
Morgan
Stanley.
I
have
two
questions,
one
on
leasing
trends
in
the
UK
and
the
other
on
rebased
earnings
for
2022.
So,
on
the
UK,
I
think
you
gave
some
disclosure
in
the
back,
which
you
highlighted,
which
is
showing
that
the
leasing
activity
is,
in
the
UK
at
least
on
I
think it's
slide
40,
showing
that
the
leasing
is still
quite
a
long
way
below
ERV.
I
wonder
if
you
can
just
give
us
some
color
on
that,
please,
and
just
suggest
how
that
can
reassure
us
for
stabilizing
ERVs
in
the
UK,
if
that's
happening
or
not.
Okay.
So,
that's
the
first
question.
The
second
on
rebased
earnings,
I
think
you
gave
a
ÂŁ52
million...
Yeah.
...number
for
rebased
earnings.
I
think
there
are
some
disposals
post
year-end
of
course,
which
you've
announced,
which
are
quite
high-yielding
disposals
and
which
I
think
have,
if
I'm not
wrong,
quite
big
impact
on
2022
earnings
as
well.
So,
I
wonder
if
you
can
just
give
a
little
bit
more
color
on
that.
And
particularly,
when
you
are
disposing
of
those
very
high-yielding
earnings
in
order
to
recycle,
can
you
give
us
some
color
about
the
yields
on
cost
that
you're
using
that
capital
to
recycle
into?
If
you're
disposing
7%
to
9%
net
initial
yields,
are
the
yields
on
cost
that
you're
reinvesting
that
capital
in
comparable
or
better?
Thank
you.
Great. Thank
you
very
much,
Christopher.
I
will
start
with
the
leasing
questions
for
the
trends
for
the
UK,
and
then
I
will
ask
Himanshu
to
take
on
the
rebased
earnings
and
I
may
come
back
with
a
few
things.
So,
just
for
the
UK,
you're
right.
I
mean,
there
is
the
UK
in
2021
still suffered
in
terms
of
ERV
and
passing.
What
you
have
to
know
however
is
that
there's
a
big
volume
of
deals.
And
in
H2
there
was
a
clear,
as
we
always
said,
a
clear
rebound.
So,
40%
of
our
deals
in
the
UK
were
over
passing
rent
and
about
35%
were
over
ERV.
And
obviously,
as
we
proceeded
in
the
year,
the
statistics
became
better.
The
other
thing
I
would
say
in
the
UK
is
that
we
did
do
eight
strategic
deals
in
the
year
that
were
below
ERV,
and
we
made
them
for
strategic
reasons
in
terms
of
wanting
to
occupy
some
part
of
the
asset
and
with
some
brands
that
we
absolutely
wanted
to
include
to
the
mix.
So,
that
has
potentially
skewed
the
statistics.
But
we're
clearly
seeing
the
trends,
ERV
declines
have
slowed.
I
would
also
tie
up
2022,
what
are
we
seeing
December,
January,
February.
Now,
we
are,
in
all
geographies,
well
ahead
of
passing
rent.
And
again,
passing
rent
for
me
is
very
important,
and when
I
say
well
ahead,
it's
over
20%,
and
same
thing
for
ERV.
And
that's
in
all
our
regions.
France
is
more
stability
and
more
growth,
but
the
UK
is
really
showing
a
strong
rebound.
And
I
think
that's
related
to
the
demand
coming
back
and
we're
starting
to
see
a
bit
more
tension
in
the
discussions
we
have,
sometimes
even
having
more
than
one
tenant
for
a
unit,
for
example.
And
the
retailers,
the
strong
retailers
really,
really
want
their
physical
space.
And
you're
starting
to
feel
that
they're
ready
to
pay
up
for
the
right
locations.
So,
the
volume
is
continuing
to
trend
very
well
for
January
and
February
2022,
and
we
think
for
the
year
to
come.
Himanshu,
do
you want
to
say
a
few...
Yeah,
sure.
...things
on
the GRI?
I
think
on
your
question,
Chris,
on the
rebased
earnings
and
disposals,
let
me
just
take
you
back
up
a
level.
The
disposals
are
about
realigning
the
portfolio,
first
and
foremost.
It's
about
reshaping
of
portfolio
for
the
future
where
we
feel
we
can
diversify
the
income
streams
for
the
future
and
really
have
those
urban
estates
for
the
future.
And that's
what
informs
the
disposal
strategy.
With
the
strengthening
of
the
balance
sheet,
of
course,
we
can
be
patient.
And
one
of your
modeling
challenge
is,
as
I
referenced,
is
what
might
the
timing
of
those
be.
But
I
think
you
had
a
follow-on
question,
which
is
really
about
the
recycling
of
that
capital,
which
is
all
about
capital
allocation.
And
Rita-Rose
shared
our
philosophy
on
that
capital
allocation.
And
it's
really
about
creating
that optionality,
which
Rose
referenced,
the
land
promotion
projects,
for
example.
But
she
also
referenced
the
near-term
ones.
We
use
Birmingham
to
illustrate.
But
we
see
those
opportunities
[ph]
to
rise
(00:47:57) across
the
portfolio.
And
then
we
referenced
in
Rita-Rose's
speech
also
there'll be
opportunities
on
the
balance
sheet
as
well.
So,
we're
mindful
of
cost
of
capital and
making
sure
that
as
we
recycle
that
capital,
we
create
those
options
for
the
future.
I
think
that's complete.
Thanks.
Hi.
Hi.
Paul
May,
Barclays.
[ph]
Several (00:48:28)
questions
from
me.
The
first one
just
on
the
earnings
point moving
forwards.
I
think
you
started with
[indiscernible]
(00:48:36).
Let's
try
again.
[ph]
So,
here
we
go (00:48:45).
That's
probably
better.
Paul
from
Barclays.
Sorry.
Just
on
the
earnings
moving
forwards,
if
you
start
with
the
[ph]
ÂŁ52 million (00:48:51),
I
think
you
get
to
quite
a
different
number
versus
the
building
blocks
that
you
gave
on
the
separate
slide
where
very,
very
quickly
you
just, all of a
sudden, you're
getting
to
around about
mid-70s
if
you
adjust
for all
the
various
things
that
you've
mentioned,
assuming
some
recovery
in
value
retail
and
other
things.
Just
wondered
which
is
the
best
start
point.
As
in,
do
you
look
at
the
[ph]
ÂŁ52
million (00:49:10) or
do
you
look
at
the
slide
where
you
keep
the
building
blocks
and
the
guidance?
Second
one
just
on
the
gross
development
value
of
the
near-term
opportunities
that
you
mentioned
greater
than
ÂŁ2.6
billion,
are
you
able
to give
any
guidance
as
to
what
the
CapEx
is
to
get
to
that
ÂŁ2.6
billion
and
the
timeframe
over
which
you
might
be
able to
achieve
that
ÂŁ2.6
billion?
And
then
finally
on
disposals
and
to
Chris's
point
about
selling
higher
yielding
assets,
obviously
France
is
something
I
think
you've
kind
of
highlighted
as
a
potential
exit,
stability
in
income
there,
yields
are
lower
there.
Is
that
something
that
now
you're
seeing
the
rebound
in
the
UK
you
don't
necessarily
need
France
to
kind
of
stabilize
the
numbers?
Is
that
something
that
you're
looking
to
actively
dispose
of?
Thank
you.
So,
thank
you
for
your
questions.
Himanshu,
maybe
take
the
first
one
on
the
earnings,
and
I'll
pitch
in
for
the
two
others.
So,
Paul,
welcome.
The
issue
we
saw
with
the
[ph]
ÂŁ52
million
(00:50:08) is you
got
to remember
all
the
periods
of
closure.
So,
in
giving
you
the
normalized
ÂŁ193
million
GRI number
and
to
work
from
that,
our
base
assumption
is
that
we're
beyond
that
COVID
period.
Whether
[ph]
it's
us (00:50:23)
or
value
retail
villages
or
even
when
France
was
open,
they
had
a
period
where
there was
a
sanitary
pass
required
to
be
worn,
not
just
to
enter
a
shopping
center,
but
to
actually
enter
individual
stores,
which
they
then
relaxed.
I
was
in
Ireland
a
few
weeks
ago
and
actually
there
was
restrictions
as
recently
as
three
weeks
ago
with
closures
at sort of
8:00 PM.
So,
the
modeling
guide
is
around
the
normalized
GRI
going
forward
and also
helps
you
by
stripping
out
the
effect
of
Silverburn
and
Leeds.
Rita-Rose,
back
to
you.
Thanks,
Himanshu.
So,
on
the
second
question,
make
sure
I
understood,
you're
asking
what
are
the
near-term
CapEx
to
unlock
or
the
overall
program.
I'll
answer
both.
I'll
go
back
to
the
whole...
It's
more
on
the
overall
program
to...
Yeah.
...get
to
the
ÂŁ2.6
billion.
Yeah.
So
yeah.
And
so,
the
overall
program,
the
gross
development
cost
is
about
ÂŁ2.5
billion,
ÂŁ2.6
billion
at
our
share.
What
I'd
like
to
say
here,
just
to
make
sure
we
state
this
clearly,
is
that
what
we
are
doing
at
the
moment
on
the
–
we
separated
this
year
in
three
buckets.
Those
land
promotion
projects
was
really
a
focus
at
the
moment
of
creating
maximum
value
short
term,
bringing
those
lands
at
a
point
where
we
will
have
the
opportunity
as
– optionality,
as
I
was
saying,
of
having
created
value
monetizing
or
determining
if
the
development
or
how
we
would
go
about
in
a
development.
At
the
moment,
there
is
a
lot
of
demand
around
those
developments.
So,
we
really
have
to
view
this
in
buckets,
the
short-term
value
and
then
the
decision
points,
what
we
crystallize
then
and
how
we
go
forward.
And
then
you
get
into
this
potential
of
ÂŁ2.5
billion,
ÂŁ2.6
billion
CapEx.
On
the
question
of
France,
France
is
a –
I
spent
a
bit
more
time
there
and
was
there
actually
recently.
France
is
a
market
at
the
moment,
which
we
have
four
assets.
We
have
two
assets
in
minority
holdings
and
two, Terrasses
du Port and Cergy,
two
strong
assets
in
which
there's
some
value
creation
to
do
that
we
would
like
to
capture.
At
the
moment,
the
portfolio
is
trending
very
well.
I
gave
stats
for
leasing
on
the
UK.
But
for
France
it's
very,
very
positively
and
the
reversion
is
positive.
ERV,
passing
rent,
there's
a
strong
demand.
We
want to
capture
that.
At
the
moment,
the
diversification
we
have
in
our
portfolio
with
UK,
France,
and
Ireland
has
served
us
very
well.
We
just
want
to
capture
maximum
value
there,
and
we'll
see
in
time.
But
at
the
moment,
for
us,
it's
a
good
contributor
in
our
portfolio
in
the
plan
and
the
time lines
of
what
we
have
to
do.
Thank
you.
Good
morning.
Hi.
It's
Julian
Livingston-Booth
from RBC.
Just
you've
highlighted
the
importance
of
the urban
estates
as
you
look
forward.
Maybe
you
could
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
decision
to
sell
the
shopping
center
in
Leeds
given
you've
got
significant
piece
of
land
nearby.
Did
it
make
it
harder
to
sell
those
shopping
centers
or
maybe
turn
it
around?
Does
it
make
you
less
excited
about
the
land
that
you
still
hold
there?
Okay.
If you
have
a
few
questions
in
there,
I'll
just
come
back
on
Leeds
and
Leeds
for
us.
The
strategy
we
have
is
to
repurpose
into
urban
estates
that
have
some
repurposing
potential
and
adjoining
land.
We
didn't
see
that
as
much
in
those
physical
assets.
Leeds
is
also
a
different
profile
of
leasing
that
had
a
bit
less
synergies
with
the
Hammerson
portfolio.
The
asset
have
[audio gap]
(00:54:31)
level
of
vacancy.
So,
it
was
a
question
for
us
of
looking
at
the
risk
return
[indiscernible]
(00:54:37) determining
if
we
wanted
to
have
that
in
the
portfolio
and
ultimately
others
–
it's
a
type
of
asset that
is
better
in
the
hands
of
others
than
in
the
hands
of
Hammerson
with
what
we
have
to
do.
As
for
the
land,
the
land
is
there.
It's
a
great
piece
of
land
and
we'll
see
in
time
what
happens
there.
Last
question
from
the
room,
so
we'll
hand
over
to
the
phone
lines
now.
[Operator Instructions]
The
first
question
comes
from the
line
of
Colm
Lauder
from
Goodbody.
Please
go
ahead.
Good
morning
all,
and
thank
you for
taking
my
question.
I'd
like
to
ask, sort
of
see
your
– and
to
hear
your
views
around
the
market
rental
side.
And
obviously
particularly
when we
look
at
the
lead
that's
been
taken
from
the
UK
market,
obviously,
ERV
declines
have
been
more
advanced
in
those
markets,
and
we
look
at
how
the
capital
value
growth
story
played
out, obviously,
UK
moved
quicker,
Ireland,
and
then
France
followed.
I
just wanted
to
understand
your
view
in
terms
of
guidance
around
the
expectations
on
potential
future
ERV
declines
in
Ireland
and
France,
obviously,
acknowledged
that
[indiscernible]
(00:56:03)
are
probably
more
prime
than
the
broader
UK
side.
But
is
this
a
case
that
those
assets
are
stronger?
So
those
ERVs
are
being
more
resilient?
Or
is
it
a
situation
whereby
perhaps
those
markets
are
lagging
the
UK?
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much,
Colm.
So
well,
my
view,
overall
view,
and
it
also
comes
from
my
past
experience
of
having
worked
into
– in
the
markets
in
France
and
looked
at
investments
in
Ireland.
I
mean,
these
three
countries
have
very
different
profiles
to
them
in
terms
of
the
lease
profiles,
how
the
lease
are
structured,
the
supply/demand
of
the
retail
sector.
I
mean,
the
UK
is
oversupplied
and
has
had
a
history
of
the
big-box
department
stores,
which
you
didn't
see
in
France.
In
France,
the
big
boxes
are
convenience
and
food.
So,
the
assets
just
have
a
– there
are
less
retail
assets
in
France.
Let's
talk
about
France
more
particularly.
And
they're
just
composed
and
mixed
in
a
different
way.
And
again,
different
lease
structures
so
that
the
ERVs
have
obviously,
and
I
think
that
the
demand
is
strong
because
there
is
a
bit
less
demand.
So, I
know
there
is
this
debate,
will
France
join
UK?
My
opinion
is,
I
don't
really
think
so
because
it's
just
very
different
environments.
And
we've
just
went
through
a
period
where
there's
been
extreme
conditions,
UK
has
went
down
about
35%
to
peak
in
terms
of the
ERVs.
You
didn't
see
that
in
France
or
Ireland.
We're
at
ultimately
also
have
the
worst –
we've
seen
the
worst
in
France
and
Ireland,
in
terms
of
the
pandemic.
So,
I'm
not
saying
we
won't
see
additional
pain,
but
I
don't
think
we
can
correlate
totally
these
countries.
The
other
thing
is
that
I
have
a
bit
of
difficulty
painting
broad
brushes
when
we
talk
about
these
things
because
it's
really
the
more
and
more
specifically
in
our
sector.
It's
going
to
be
about
the
quality
of
the
asset
in
terms
of
the
mix
of
these
assets,
the
adaptability
of
these
assets
to
the
new
world,
basically.
So,
it's
going
to
be
very
specific
to
the
assets.
In
France,
we
have
two
assets
there.
One
in
Paris
and
one
very
close
to
Paris,
very
well
located
in
their
catchment
areas.
And
as
I
said,
flagship
in
Marseille
and
Cergy,
that
is
one
that
is
in
a
– is
a
lone
ranger
in
its
catchment
area.
So
a
great
mixed
use
asset
potential.
So,
I
think
we
really
start
– have
to
start
thinking
about
these
things
pretty
much
specifically
with
the
assets,
their
locations,
their
mix
and
how
they're
operated. This
is
my
view.
Thank
you.
And
just
one
follow-on
question
just
also
looking
at
leasing
and
rental
trends.
And
it'd
be
good
to
understand
the
types
of
structures
that
we're
seeing
in
terms
of
the
demand
from
your
occupiers,
the
key
trend
of
the
market
had
been
or
is
the evolution
of
alternative
lease
structures,
turnover-linked
leases,
etcetera,
versus
more
traditional
open
market
rent
[ph]
filled (00:59:33)
structures.
If
we
look
at
that
good
volume
of
leasing,
which
you
concluded
over
the
period,
what
sort
of
changes
are
you
seeing
within
lease
terms?
Are
you
seeing
increased
occupier
demand
for
those
turnover-linked
or
perhaps
inflation
or
[ph]
fixed
uplift-linked (00:59:46)
style
leases?
Or
is
the
dominance
still
an
open
market
rent
reviews
given
that
ERVs have
fallen?
Thank
you.
Sorry.
The
technology
over
here
skewed
your
question
a
bit
but
I
think
your
question
has
to
do
about
what
we're
seeing
in
terms
of
demand
in
terms
of
types
of
structures
of
leases.
I
can
answer
to
that
question
on
the
side
of
the
demand,
but
I
also
– I'll
answer
the
question
on
the
side
of
what
we
want
to
do
on
our
portfolio
and
how
we
see
the
risk
profile.
So,
currently,
yes,
you
will
see
more
and
more
demand
pushing
for
turnover
[ph]
leasing (01:00:27)
turnover
rent.
And
that
may
be
good
in
some
cases
but
it
may
be
risky
in
other
cases.
And
in
the
case
of
Hammerson,
at
the
moment,
we
are
still
leasing
and,
leaning
towards
the
maximum
guaranteed
rent
with
some
performance
elements
to
it.
So,
the
majority
still
–
[ph]
that's
still
what
we
achieved (01:00:48).
And
I
think,
as
I
said,
it's
a
question
of
strategy
and
I
don't
think
we're
getting
paid
enough
to
be
capped on
turnover
rent
in
many
cases.
So,
that's
really
the
drivers.
That's
perfect.
Thank
you
very much.
Next
question,
[ph]
Tom
(01:01:17).
[audio gap]
(01:01:18-01:02:03).
Thank
you.
Okay.
So,
there's
different
things
in
your
question,
just
very
quickly,
and
I'll
ask
Himanshu
to
pitch
in
on
some
elements.
But
the
view
on
earnings,
yes,
there
is
loss
of
income
with
the
sales,
and
that's
why
we're
proceeding
in
a
very
disciplined
way,
and
that's why
we
put
ourselves
in
a
situation
at
midyear
where
we
were
not
forced
to
sell
rashly
[indiscernible]
(01:02:32).
So,
it's
all
very
much
a
balancing
act
that
we're
achieving.
I
would
say
that
we
still
have
vacancy
on
the
portfolio.
So,
our
earnings,
we
do
want
to
increase
the
top
line
and
we
can
whatever
we
sell,
and
then
working
on
the
cost
structure
and
having
– and
working
on
having
strong
earnings
and
increasing
those
earnings.
So,
there's
different
elements
at
play
and
some
of
them
are
totally
under
our
control.
But
that's
how
I
think
about
that
earning.
And
also,
we
are
total
return
focused,
so
there's
the
earnings,
but
there's
also
this
thinking
about
we
do
want
to
create
capital
appreciation
in
the
portfolio
also,
so
that's
why
we're
managing
our
strategy
in
those
–
within
those
two
blocks
at
this
time.
In
terms
of
the
leverage
Value
Retail,
maybe
Himanshu,
you
want
to
say
a
few
words
on
that
one?
Yeah,
for
sure.
Look,
we're
committed,
as
you
know,
to
an
IG
rating,
and
we
talked
about
both
a
resilient
and
a
sustainable
capital
structure.
For
us,
it's
not
about
a
specific
number
around
LTV,
we're
at
37%
pro
forma
today,
[ph]
it's right
number
35% (01:03:47),
it
depends
where
you
are
in
cycle
or
whether
it's
[ph]
33% (01:03:51).
But
I
think
behind
your
question
is
really
how
do
you
finance
the
longer
term
developments?
And
Rita-Rose
has
articulated that,
I
think,
really
strongly,
which
is
it's
about
land
promotion
projects
and
creating
optionality
and
that
pivot
point
when
we
reach
points
of
liquidity.
As
to
then,
do
we
follow
our
money
and
invest
or
do
we
take
liquidity
off
the
table? And
it's
about
total
returns
and
best
returns
to
shareholders.
Rita-Rose?
Well,
I
think,
does
that
answer
fully
to
your
question?
[indiscernible]
(01:04:29-01:04:37)?
If
I
understand
the
question
right,
you're
asking
us
if
the
sell
of
Value
Retail
is
still
in
our
options?
Yeah.
[indiscernible]
(01:04:46).
Yes.
Okay,
great.
Listen,
on
that,
we –
I
think
we
showed
today
how
strong
the
rebound
has
been
in
Value
Retail.
And
we
expect
that
rebound
to
continue.
These
are
great
assets,
great
platform,
a
lot
of
people, the
sector
that's
very
much
in-demand
at
the
moment.
Investors
are
looking
for
that and
we
have
them.
And
we
want
to
benefit
from
the
value
that
is
getting
out
of
that.
Of
course,
this
is
a
very
strong
platform.
There
are
strong,
sophisticated
partners
in
the
platform.
And
there
is
always
for
that
types
of
assets
and
platforms,
there's
always
going
to
be
optionality
for
doing
whatever
we
want
to
do
in
terms
of
exits
eventually.
But
for
now,
we're
still
benefiting
off
that
rebound
in
the
portfolio.
And
it
just
goes
to
show
how
much
opportunity
Hammerson
has
in
its
portfolio.
The
last
thing
I
would
say
and
Himanshu
did
touch a
point
in
his
presentation
on
the
transactional
evidence.
When
I
say
these
assets
are
very
coveted,
we
just
saw
some
assets
come
to
the
market
at
about
6%
yield.
So,
we're
quite
happy
with
what
we
have
at
the
moment.
But
again,
it's
options
we
have
for
the
future
in
the
portfolio.
Thank
you.
We
are just
about
out
of
time.
But
there
are
a
couple
of
clarification
questions
from
[ph]
Michael
at (01:06:22)
Jefferies
online,
which
is
worth
covering.
First
is
the
CapEx
guidance
for
FY 2022
including
the
ÂŁ35
million
cost
of
going
green?
And
then
second,
what
is
the
balance
sheet
liquidity
after
meeting
or
refinancing
and CapEx
obligations
to
December
2022?
Thanks,
Josh
and
[ph]
Michael (01:06:42).
So,
Himanshu,
I
think
you're
well-positioned
to
deal with
this.
So,
the
reference –
Good
morning,
[ph]
Mike (01:06:49).
The
reference
to
the
ÂŁ35 million
to
ÂŁ50
million was
that our
share
and
it
is
inclusive
because
that
ÂŁ35
million to
ÂŁ50
million
was
spread
over
eight
years
to
get
to
the
equivalent
of
EPC
B.
As
Rita-Rose
referenced, it's
actually –
we're
already
at
the
2023
standards
in
our
portfolio
with
the
vast
majority
stay
already
at
E.
Josh,
would
you
just
repeat
the
second
question
for
me,
please?
What
is
year-end
liquidity
after
meeting
CapEx
and
financing
obligations
for
December
2022?
Well, look,
liquidity
today
is
ÂŁ1.7
billion.
There
are
no
major
refinancings
till
2025
that
aren't
covered.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
refinance
with
cash
€235
million
bond
[ph]
part
call (01:07:46)
in
December
of
this
year.
And
that's
the
only
near-term
maturity.
The
next
maturities
are
in
the
USPP
portfolio,
it's
about
ÂŁ140
million
of
our
ÂŁ216
million
USPPs.
They
don't
come
available
till
actually
2024,
so
liquidity
just
remains
strong.
And
actually,
you
could
argue
after
where
this
business
has
been
over
the last
two
years.
Actually,
the
balance
sheet,
some
might
say
is
a
little
inefficient,
but
I
just
remind
people
where
this
business
was
two
years
ago
and
the
progress
made.
So,
high
liquidity
remains
through
2022.
So
I
think
–
I'm
told
that
there's
no
other
questions
at
the
moment.
Obviously,
you
all
know
Josh,
and
you
can
call
Josh
for
additional
information.
So
again,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
attention.
A
lot
of
information,
but
we
really
appreciate
your
presence
physically
here
in
the
circumstances
and
see
you
soon,
I
hope. Thank you.
Thanks,
[ph]
Rose (01:08:53).