Admiral Group PLC
LSE:ADM
US |
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
|
US |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
Consumer products
|
|
US |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
US |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
Financial Services
|
|
US |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
|
US |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
|
CN |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
|
US |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
|
US |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
|
US |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
|
US |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
Retail
|
|
US |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
Media
|
|
US |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
Machinery
|
|
US |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
Technology
|
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
2 472
2 993
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches GBX.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US | |
Estee Lauder Companies Inc
NYSE:EL
|
US | |
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US | |
Church & Dwight Co Inc
NYSE:CHD
|
US | |
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US | |
American Express Co
NYSE:AXP
|
US | |
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US | |
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US | |
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN | |
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US | |
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US | |
Target Corp
NYSE:TGT
|
US | |
Walt Disney Co
NYSE:DIS
|
US | |
Mueller Industries Inc
NYSE:MLI
|
US | |
PayPal Holdings Inc
NASDAQ:PYPL
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Ladies
and gentlemen,
thank
you
for
standing
by
and
welcome
to
the
Admiral
Group
Full-Year
Results
2021
Conference
Call.
At
this
time,
all
participants
are
in
a
listen-only
mode.
After
the
speaker
presentation,
there
will
be
a
question-and-answer
session.
[Operator Instructions]
It
is
now
my
pleasure
to
introduce
Group
CEO,
Milena
Mondini.
Good
morning, everybody,
and
welcome
to
our
fourth
and
hopefully
last
virtual
results
presentation.
2021,
like
2020
before,
it
was
a very
interesting
year,
by
no
means
a
standard
one.
We
grew
in
all
our
business
and
recorded
strong
profits
with
COVID
still
remaining
a
relevant
feature.
The
team
is here
with
you
today,
and
Geraint, our
CFO,
will
give
you
more
detail
on
our
great
results. Cristina and
Adam,
respectively,
CEO
and
Deputy
UK
Claims
Director,
will
explain
how
UK
insurance
has
been
the
key
driver
of
these
exceptional
performance.
Costantino,
Head
of
International,
will talk
to
us
about
the
growth
and the
competitive
market
conditions
in
the
other
countries.
And
Scott,
CEO
of
Admiral
Money,
will
share
with
you
how
loans
is
leveraging
on
strong
foundation
and
is
primed
for
further
growth.
At
the
end,
I
will
share
how
proud
we
are
of
our
increased
effort
and
contribution
for
a
more
sustainable
future
for
the
larger
community
and
how
this
long-term
focus
is an
integral
part
of
our
strategy.
But
first,
the
key
highlights.
2021
has
been
a
year
of
growth
in
customer
and,
to
a
lesser
extent,
turnover
across
every
business
and
every
country
in
the
group.
We
continue
to
provide
a
strong
service
with
great
feedback
scores
and more
customer
decided
to
remain
with
us.
We
deliver
a
record
profit
of
ÂŁ769
million
that
in
turn
resulted
once
again
in
a
record
dividend
of
ÂŁ1.87
per
share.
And
keep
in
mind
that
this
excludes
the
additional
dividend
for
the
second
part
of
the
proceed
from
the
sales
of
Penguin
Portals.
The key
contributor
of
these
results
was
UK
Motor
Insurance,
also
benefit
from
lower
frequency
due
to
COVID, particularly
in
H1,
as
well
as
the
positive
evolution
of
the
back
year
reserves,
as
Cristina
and
Geraint will
explain
later.
As
COVID
knocks on
wind
and
we
gradually
return
to
more
normal
life,
we
expect
a
lower
level
of
profit
in
2022.
We
also
made
strong
progress
in
our
strategy.
We
are
indeed
growing
our
customer
base
internationally
and
in
other
lines
of
businesses
such
as
household
and
loans
in
the
UK.
Around
700,000
additional
customers
joined
the
Admiral
family
and
0.5
million
of
those
for
products
outside
UK
car
insurance.
And
these
new
cohort
of
customer
now
accounts
for
over
40%
of
the
total.
In
addition,
we
are
enhancing
our
capability
to
deliver
on
evolving
customer
needs,
a
leverage
of
new
data
and
modeling
techniques
to
improve
our
customer
experience
and
pricing.
This
is particularly
relevant
to
us
in
the
context
of
continuous
evolution
of
the
market
and
external
conditions
that
are
more
volatile
than
usual.
We
believe
that
we're
well placed
to
face
them.
Now,
let
me
start
with
the
reminder
of
our
overall
approach
to
value
creation.
Our
primary
aim
remains
to
continue
to
focus
on
doing
the
common
uncommonly
well,
from
risk
selection
to
claims
management
and
always
putting
our
customer
first.
This
continuous search
for
operational
excellence
results
in
a
market-leading
combined
ratio
that,
in
turn,
allows
us
to
grow
in
different
market
conditions.
And
our
ambition
now
is
to
transfer
the
same
virtuous
circle
into
other
business
lines.
How
we
will
achieve
that?
To
me,
the
secret
ingredient
is
always
being
a
truly
unique
and
powerful
culture,
engaging,
empowering,
fun,
data-driven,
curious,
inclusive
and
also
strong
alignment
of
interests
with
all
stakeholders,
starting
with
employees
who
are
incentivized
with
Admiral
shares.
As
mentioned
in
the
past,
we
strongly
believe
that
happy
employee
translates
into
happy
customers
that,
in
turn,
translate
into
happy
shareholders.
The
number
on
these
slides
are
an
average
of
last
five
years,
and
2021
was
no
different
with
strong
metrics
across
the
board
as
Geraint
will
explain
later.
But
it's
fair
to
say
that
2021
benefited
also
from
exceptional
circumstances
linked
to
COVID,
particularly
motor
insurance
where
the
starting
point
was
a
2020
record
low
combined
ratio
in
the
last 15
years
in
every
country.
In
2021,
with
the
gradual
release
of
restriction,
claims
frequency
generally
increased
towards
but
not
entirely
back
to
pre-COVID
level. And
at
the
same
time,
we
experienced
strong
claims
inflation.
So
premiums
should
have
followed
the
same
fortune
and
gone
up.
But
price
increases
have been
delayed
for
several
reasons
as
frequency
lagging
miles
driven
and
in
the
UK,
a
lower
percentage
of
bodily
injuries
in
the
claims
mix.
We've
seen
less
young
drivers
on
the
road,
less
congestion
in
peak
hours,
less
drink
and
drive
and,
in
the
second
half
of
the
year,
less
whiplash
notification.
As
some of
these
factors
are
unwinding,
we
should
expect
worsening
results
for
the
market
as
a
whole
in
2022
and
premiums
may
gradually
start
to
recover.
The
impact
of
COVID,
though,
was
different
by
country
and
by
business
line.
In
Europe
and
US,
where
shopping
habits
are
less
ingrained
and
in
a
context
of
lower
renewal
premium,
we
saw
less
shoppers
and
less reachers. This
was
particularly
true
in
the
direct
channel,
where
premiums
decrease
even
more.
And
Italy
and
Spain
were
particularly
affected
by
this
dynamic,
while
France
has
been
the
only exception
with
a
moderate
premium
increase.
In
the
US,
the
overall
frequency
benefit
was
lower
with
earlier
and
sharper
increase
in
miles
driven.
And
in
the
States,
we
also
saw
strong
inflation
in
acquisition
cost.
But
on the
other side, it's
worth
to
remind
that
COVID
forced
a
lot
of
people
to
become
more
aware
and
confident
with
the
line
shopping.
And
we
expect
that
direct
channel
growth
will
benefit
from
this
once
the
cycle
will
revert.
Young
motor
insurance,
the
impact
of
COVID
was
less
material in
the household where
the
main
change
was
in
the
mix
of
claims
with
less
escape
of
water
and
theft,
but
increased
accidental
damage
as
people
stayed
at
home
more.
And
finally,
loans
and
travel
insurance
market,
which
severely
contracted
in
2020, has started
to
recover
in
2021,
as
Scott
will
explain
later.
So
what's
next?
We're still
in
a
period with
a
concentration
of
sources
of
uncertainty
from
the
evolution
of
COVID,
the
virus
itself, the
regulations
in
place,
the
driving
behaviors
to
the evolution
of
claims
inflation
that
was
particularly
high
toward
the
end
of
2021
in
UK
and
we
issue
around
the
supply
chain
to
the
FCA pricing
reform
that
is
possibly
the
biggest
change
in
pricing
regulation
we've
seen
so
far.
And
while
the
reaction
of
the
market
is in
the
range
of
what
we
could
have
expected,
we'll
probably see
further iteration
of
pricing adjustment,
channel strategies,
or
new
products.
Finally,
the
way
insurance
company
operate is
so
different
from
what
used
to
be.
We've
seen
office
working,
remote
working,
partially
hybrid
working
and
in
2022
we'll
hopefully
see
what's
the
new normal
will
really
look
like.
In my
opinion,
hybrid
at
scale
may
be
a
great
opportunity,
but
will
also
be
more
complex
to
manage
and
will
require
focus
and
dedication.
It
also
has
an
impact
on
technology,
infrastructure,
and
talent
acquisition
and
retention.
All
this will
affect
the
market
as
a
whole,
and
we
are
not
immune,
of
course,
but
we
believe
that
we
are
in
a
good
position
as
some
of
those
changes
really
play
our
historical
strengths,
including
our
strong culture
and
focus
on
people,
as
well
as
efficient
claims
management,
pricing
sophistication
and
agility.
Having
said
that,
we're
not
resting
on
our
laurels.
We
are
continuing
to
invest
to
make
sure
we
nurture
the
technical
and
core
competencies
that
help
us
to
succeed
so
far. And
this
is
indeed
the
first
pillar
of
our
strategy,
to
make
sure
that
we're
always
ready
to
meet
ever
evolving
customer
needs
even
faster.
I
will
talk
more
about
this in
a
moment.
There
are
two pillars
of
our
strategy
also
remain
unchanged.
The
second
is to
take
our
competencies
and
transfer
them
into
new
line
of
business
with
the
objective
of
improving
our
proposition
to
our
customers,
increasing
our
engagement
with
them
and
increase
the
resilience
of
our
business
model.
How
we will
do
this?
In
a
very
Admiral
fashion,
trying
to
create
first
something
special,
learning
and
pivoting
fast,
and
then
scaling
it
once
we
gain
confidence
in
its
potential.
And
this
is
exactly
what
we
did
for
household
insurance
and
loans.
In
2021,
household
had
more
than
1.3
million
customers
and
loans
reached
the
milestone
of
more
than
ÂŁ1
billion
disbursed
since
launch.
At
the
same
time,
we
are
planting
more
seeds
for
the
long term
mainly
through
Admiral
Pioneer,
our
new
ventures
arm,
that
this
year
launched
its
first
new
products
for
small,
medium
enterprises.
The
last
pillar of
our
strategy
is
also
center
on
our
customers.
Has
it
changed
the
way
they
move
around?
We
want
to
make
sure
we
evolve
our
offering
accordingly.
This
is
a
longer
term
objective
as
some
of
these
trends
are
still
nascent.
For
the
time
being,
we
are
mainly
focusing
on
testing
fleet
insurance
and
mastering
insurance
for
electric
vehicles
that
more
than
doubled
in
our
portfolio
last
year.
But
now,
let
me
go
back
to
the
first
one,
Admiral
2.0.
When
I
joined
Admiral,
Henry,
our
founder,
used
to
say
Admiral
is
a
speedboat
in
a
sea
of
tankers.
Now,
one
of
our
challenges
was
how
we
can
ensure
we
remain
a
speedboat with
the
required
agility
while
going
from
1
million
to
8
million
customers
and
for
one
to
many
products. And
this
has
been
where
we've
been
focusing
lots
of
our
attention
in the
last
two
years.
And
if
I
look
back
at
the
transformation
we
went
through,
it's
impressive.
Let
me
highlight
a
couple
of
examples.
Agile
methodology.
To me,
this
is
a
very
close
to
the
concept
of
speedboat.
Speed
focused
empowerment
to
teams
that
live
and
breathe
customer.
And
scale
agile is
the
industrialization
of
this
matter,
the
scale.
In
Italy,
where
we already
completed this
last
step,
we
doubled
productivity
and
substantially
increased
quality
of
releases.
But
what
I'm
most
passionate
about
is advanced
modeling
techniques.
We
love
data.
We
always
have.
In
the
past,
what
was
turning
us
on
was
a
new
piece
of
data.
Now,
more
and
more
is
the
ability
to
use
it
sooner.
With
more
advanced analytics
underpinned
by
solid,
cloud-based
data
structure,
we
can now,
for
example,
provide
real-time
feedback
to
our
telematics
customer
that
in
turn
improves
their
driving
and
this is
a
win-win
for
the
customer
and
for
the
business.
As
another
example,
we
were able
to
make
substantial
changes
to
pricing
in
advance
of
the
FCA
pricing
reform
relatively
quickly
for
new
business
and
renewal,
while
announcing
pricing
sophistication
at
the
same
time.
And
finally,
we
had
to
adapt
our
ways
of
working
not
only
because
of
COVID,
but
also
to
support
these
changes
and
to
ensure
strong
talent
where
it's
needed
the
most.
We
extended
our
recruitment
pool,
upskilled
and
reskilled
many
people.
And
I'm always
so
impressed
by
the
level
of
commitment
and
adaptability
of
our
colleagues
that
I
could
never
thank
enough.
Bringing
this
session
to
a
close,
we
have
delivered
strong
results
by
focusing
on
what
we
do
best
and
help
by
unusual
market
conditions,
while
continuing
to
innovate
to
capture
future
opportunities.
And
speaking
about
smart
working
and
smart
people,
let
me hand
it
over
now
to
Geraint,
who
is
featuring
these
pictures
as
smart
and
very
fun
news
of
our
annual
management
awards.
Thanks,
Milena.
Hi,
everyone.
I'll
take
some
time
to
explain
the
large
increase
in
profit
Milena
highlighted
earlier
and
also
cover
some
decent
progress
on
top
line
and
custom
items. I'll
highlight
a
continued
very
strong
solvency
position
and
report
on the
final
and
full-year
dividends
for
2021.
To
start
with our
course, the
highlights,
as
you'll
see,
a
really
positive
set
of
figures
to
report
on
the
2021.
Profit
firstly,
the
pre-tax
result
was
up
to
ÂŁ769
million
that's plus
26%
and
earnings
per
share
was
up
24%
to
ÂŁ2.12
per
share.
Important
to note
that
both
of
those
figures
exclude the
impact
of
some
restructured
costs
that
we
took
in
2021,
which
I'll
cover
later.
And
as
we
flagged
previously,
the
H2
result
was
significantly
lower
than
H1.
Good
growth
in
customer
numbers,
not
too
far
away
from
plus
10% again,
now up
to
8.4
million.
And
turnover
up
to
ÂŁ3.5
billion,
but
the
increase
there
was
lower
in
customer
growth
as
average
premiums
reduced
in
several
markets.
The
solvency
ratio
improved
year-on-year
to
195%
and
inevitably
with
such
a
strong
profit
for
the
year,
return
on
equity
was
very
strong.
The
full
year
dividend
was
19%
up
on
2020.
And
in
addition,
we'll
pay
two
of
the
three
Penguin
Portals
disposal
dividends
totaling
ÂŁ0.92
per
share
with
the
2021
dividends.
Moving
on
now
to
look
at
revenue
and
customer
numbers.
Another
full
set
of
green
arrows
on
show
here,
which
is
pleasing.
All
our
businesses
grew
customers
year-on-year
and
in
the
second
half,
though
you'll
notice
that
the
rates
of
growth
in
some
cases
slowed
in
H2.
In
the
UK,
motor
customers
were
up
5%.
They
were
only
marginally
up
in
H2,
but
the
turnover
was
actually
pretty
flat
year-on-year
when
the
impact
of
the
2020
premium
rebate
was
considered.
Cristina
will
talk
more
about
the
second
half,
particularly
later
on,
Household
customers
and
turnover
both
up
very
nicely
again,
plus
13%,
plus
14%.
And
a
very
similar
story
to
the
half
year
for
our
international
business
is,
customer
numbers
were
up
quite
nicely,
plus
13%.
The
pressure
on
average
premium
levels
meant
that
turnover
growth
was
quite
a
bit
lower.
L'olivier
in
France
continues
to
grow
particularly
strongly.
And
finally,
it
was
a
really
pleasing
year
for
our
loans
business,
and
we
returned
to
some
strong
growth
here.
Balance
is
now
up
over
ÂŁ600
million,
with
more
of the
same
planned
for
2022.
Let's
start
now
to
look
at
that
big
profit
increase.
This
is
the
group
income
statement
versus
2020
by
business
segments.
And
you
can
clearly
see
the
driver
of
the
year-on-year
increase
The
total
UK
insurance
results
was
nearly
ÂŁ200
million
or
just
under
30%
higher
than
2020.
We
saw
further
improvement
in
the
UK
household
profits
to
over
ÂŁ20
million
as
we
continue
to
grow
and saw
high
profit
commission.
But
the
motor
results
were
significantly
nearly
ÂŁ190
million higher,
and
I'll give
a
bit
more
detail
on
that
on
the
next
page.
Outside
the
UK,
the
result
worsened
by
around
ÂŁ20
million
compared
to
a
positive
COVID-impacted
results
for
2020.
All
the
businesses
continued
to
grow,
sometimes
in
very
challenging
markets,
as
we
saw
just
now.
But
we
saw
a
higher
loss
ratio
as
that
COVID
benefit
unwound
and
the
very
slightly
higher
expense
ratio
too.
Our
European
insurers
continue
to
be
profitable
overall
whilst
investing
small
amounts
in
new
products
in
France
and
Italy.
And
in
the
US, Elephant's
loss
was
higher
year-on-year
due
to
a
higher
loss
ratio
and
increased
acquisition
costs.
More
detail
later
on
the call.
Admiral
Loans'
results
improved
as
the
charge
for
expected
credit
losses
was
unsurprisingly
materially
reduced
versus
2020, and
the
relatively
small
loss
there
comes
despite
fast
growth
and
associated
acquisition
costs.
The split
of profit
for
the
year
was
around ÂŁ480
million
in
H1
and
around
ÂŁ290
million
in
H2.
It's
quite
different
as
the
impact
of
COVID
unwound
over
the
course
of
the
year. Hopefully,
it's
well
understood
that
both
2020
and
2021
years have
seen
unusually
high
levels
of
profit,
and
the
results
for
2022
will
be
lower.
Let's
go
into
a
bit
more
detail
now
on
the
UK
Motor
results.
This
is
the
UK
Motor
income
statement.
As
you
can
see,
profit
increased
from
ÂŁ684
million
to
ÂŁ872
million and
we've
highlighted
the
key
drivers
of
the
change.
Higher
premium,
higher
reserve
releases
and
higher
profit
commission
are
all
as
reported
at
the
half
year
and
indeed
much
of
the
positive
variance
resulted
from
the
first
half
results.
And
offsetting
those
positive
variances,
the
current
year
claims
cost
and
loss
ratio
are
higher
for
2021
than
2020
as
we
saw
a
more
normal
claims
environment
in
H2
and
consequently
a
higher
booked
ratio
for
the
year.
Let's
look
a
bit
more at
what's
driving
the
increases
in
claims,
reserve
releases
and
profit
commission.
On the
top
of
this
slide,
we
show
the
book
loss
ratios
by
underwriting
year for
the
recent
past.
For
example,
the
2018
underwriting
year
was
first
booked
at
92%
at
the
end
of
2018.
That
had
released
down
to
81%
at the
year-end
2019
and
has
come
down
to
73%
at
the
end
of
2021.
And
on the
bottom,
we
show
reserve
releases
and
profit
commission
split
by
underwriting
year
for
2021
on the
right
and
2020 on
the
left.
On reserve
releases,
in
the
first
half,
you
might
remember
that
we
saw
very
significantly
bigger
releases
in
2021
than
in
2020, and
a
number
of
those
underwriting
years
become
very
profitable. Releases
in
H2
were
much
more
in
line
with
H2
2020.
Because
of
the
very
positive
first
half,
2021's
releases
overall
were
higher
than
2020.
Because
of
the
level
of
profitability
of
a
number
of
the
underwriting
years,
we
see
much
higher
profit
commission,
as
you
can
see
in
the
green
on
the
bottom
charts,
most
evident,
of
course,
for
2020
year,
which
considering
the
stage
of
development
is
really
very
profitable.
In
summary,
as
at
the
half
year,
there
are
more
points
of
book
loss
ratio
movement,
and
each
point
of
movement
is
generating
more
profit.
We
have
reduced
the
level
of
margin
held
in
the
book
reserve
slightly
versus
the
end
of
last
year,
but it's
still
a
course
remains
appropriately
prudent.
We
will
go
now
to
look
at
solvency
and
dividend.
I'm
covering
solvency
first
on
the top
of
the
slide,
not
too
much
to
say
here.
The
year-end
position
is
very
strong,
just
under
200%.
We
see
a
similar
level
of
surplus
versus
the
end
of
2020 and
decreased
capital
requirements
both
at
the
half
and
full
year
2021,
which
is
partly
an
unwind
of
the
increase
in
the
requirement
that
we
saw
at
the
end
of
2020
relating
to
higher
profit
commissions
at
the
point.
On
dividend
on
the
bottom
of
the
slide,
we're
proposing
a
final
dividend
in
two
parts,
firstly
ÂŁ0.72
per
share
in
respect
to
the
second
half
results, that's
91%
of
the
second half
earnings
excluding
the
impact
of
the
restructure
cost
or
113%
of
earnings
if
that
cost
is
included.
And
on
top
of
that
ÂŁ0.72,
we
had
the
second
tranche
of
the
Penguin
Portals
disposal
which
is
ÂŁ0.46
per
share.
And
that
makes
a
total
final
dividend
of
ÂŁ1.18
per
share.
And
for
completeness,
the
full
year
dividend
is
ÂŁ1.87
per
share
excluding
the
Penguin
Portals
element.
That's
a
healthy
19%
up
on
2020,
and
it's
ÂŁ2.79
per
share
with
the
Penguin
proceeds.
Two
final
points
from
me
before I
wrap
up.
Firstly,
as
you
saw
a
few
slides
ago,
we
took
a
ÂŁ56
million
restructuring
charge
in
the
UK
insurance
business
in
2021.
There
are
three
main
parts
of that
cost,
two
of
them
comprise
the
majority.
Firstly,
technology
impairments
which
were
mainly
due
to
the
upgrade
of
the
main
policy
system;
and
secondly,
the
costs
of
early
exits
or
downsizing
a
couple
of
our
offices
due
to
the
move
to
hybrid
working.
The
total
cost
across
those
three
areas was
actually
around
ÂŁ65
million
with
a
large
bulk
of
it
taken
in
2021. And
we're
not
expecting
any
notable
impact
in
2022
and
beyond.
And
second,
you
might
remember
at
the
half
year,
we
were
just
concluding
negotiations
with
Munich
Re
on
the
expiring
30%
UK
co-insurance
contract.
We're
very
pleased
with
the
new
structure.
It's
very
long
term
with
the
co-insurance
agreement
running
to
2029,
which
means
our
partnership
will have
extended
to
nearly
30
years.
The
new
contracts
will
allow
for
greater
profit
commission
to
Admiral
than
the
expiring
ones.
That's
it
for
me.
So,
I'll
leave
you
with
some
key
points.
Continued
decent
growth
in
several
places,
though
a
bit
more
muted
in
H2
in
the
UK,
and
average
premiums
have
reduced
in
several
markets.
Profit
for
2021
was
very
high
and
had
an
already
very
strong
2020,
and
our
capital
position
remains
strong
after
another
increased
full
year
dividend.
I'll
hand
you
now
to
Cristina
to
talk
to
us
about
the
UK
insurance
business.
Cristina?
Hello
and
welcome.
2021
has
been
a
very
strong
year
for
UK
insurance,
with
a
significant
increase
in
profit
and
good
growth.
However,
just
like
football,
it's
been
a
game
of
two
halves,
because
the
growth
in
profits
and
policies
has
been
concentrated
in
the
first
half
of
the
year.
Let's
start
with
a
summary
of
the
highlights.
As Geraint
has
mentioned,
the
main
feature
of
our
results
is
the
increase
in
profits.
Also,
we
have
motor
policies
growing
by
5%.
The
FCA
pricing
change
has
impacted
new
business
prices
in
line
with
expectations.
Claims
frequency
continues
to
be
low,
but
lots of
external
pressures
have
resulted
in
very
high
damage
inflation.
Our
expense
ratio
has
increased
by
1
point
due
to
high IT
investment
and
low
average
premium.
And
finally,
our
household
book
has
continued
growing
in
profits
and
sales.
Moving
to
market
prices,
during
the
second
half,
market
conditions
were
challenging
and
Admiral
became
less
competitive.
We
have
maintained
pricing
discipline
to
reflect
claims
inflation.
This
is
consistent
with
our
pricing
philosophy.
To
put
this
into
context,
let's
review
our
strategy
in
the
past
couple
of
years.
As
you
can
see on the
graph
on
the
right,
there
have
been
strong
increases
in
our
Times
Top
from
Q2
2020
to
Q1
2021,
which
resulted
in
significant
growth.
Since
Q2
last
year,
Admiral
prices
have
become
less
competitive,
which
has
resulted
in
no
growth.
Also
during
the
past
two
years,
we
have
had a
strong
retention.
And
finally,
our
Times
Top
has
increased
in
December.
This
month
has
been
impacted
by
lots
of
volatility
in
the
market
ahead
of
the
FCA
pricing
changes.
What
we
expect
for
the
first
half
of
2022? We
still
think
there
will
be some
volatility
in
market
prices,
and
Admiral,
like
always,
will
continue
to
maintain
pricing
discipline.
So,
what
has been the
initial
impact
of
the
FCA
reform?
From
our
perspective,
both
the
motor
and
household
market
have
behaved
on
average
rationally
and
have
increased
new
business
prices
in
line
with
expectations,
around
high-single
digits
for
car
and
double
digits
for
household.
However,
it's
still
too
early
to
understand
the
full
impact
of
the
reform
in
two
key
areas:
market
retention
and
the
price
comparison
market.
We
will
know
more
in
a
few
months.
Admiral
was
well prepared
for
the
reform,
and
our
initial
strategy
has
been:
first,
we
increased
new
business
prices
at
the
end
of
December,
and
our
price
increase
have
been
in
line
with
the
market.
Secondly,
we
launched
last
year
four
tiers
for
our
car
product
to
offer our
customers
a
wide
range
of
products
to
cover
their
needs.
This includes
our
essential
product,
which
has
a
lower
price
and
lower
coverage
than
the
standard
Admiral
product.
As
a
reminder,
we
offer
tiers
for
household
since
launch
with
good
effect.
We
believe
Admiral
is
well placed
to
face
this
reform.
We
have
strong
underwriting
capabilities,
good
customer
service,
and
a
strong
brand,
which
are
key
factors
for
success.
And
now,
I'm going
to
pass
it
to
Adam,
who
will
tell
us
much
more
about
claims.
Thanks,
Cristina,
and
good
morning,
everyone.
I'm
very
happy
to
be
here
today
to
talk to
you about
claims,
but I'm
conscious
that
some of
you
may
not have
met
me
before.
So,
as
Cristina
mentioned,
I'm
Adam.
I've
been
part
of
the
Admiral
Group
since
2003,
spending
virtually all
of
that
time
in
claims.
I've
worked
in
all
areas
of
claims,
but
the
majority
of
my
time
has
been
spent
in
the
technical
areas
in
bodily
injury.
I'll
start
by
giving
you
some
context
from
the
UK
motor
claims
market
in
the
last
year.
You
can
see
the
frequency
during
the
pandemic
has
been
significantly
below
expected
levels.
We
know
that
one
of the
main
factors
influencing
this
is
miles
driven,
which
has
been
suppressed
during
various
lockdowns.
We
also
know
that
as
frequency
reduces,
the
dynamic
on
our
roads
changes,
causing
the
typical
mix
of
accident
types
to
change.
The
slight
change
in
accident
mix,
together
with
some
changes
in
accident
times
caused
by
less
commuting,
is
causing
frequencies
to
lag
behind
miles
driven.
We
expect
some
of
these
trends
to
persist
after
we
hopefully
leave
COVID
behind
us.
Whilst
on
frequency,
I
thought
I'd
give
you
an
update
on
the
whiplash
reforms
too.
Nine
months
or
so
in,
we're
building
a
picture
of
the
market
post-reform,
and
despite
being impacted
by
some
COVID-related
factors,
we're
clear
now
that
the
whiplash
reforms
have
lowered
small
BI frequency.
It's
too
early
to
be
certain
about
the
exact
extents
of
that
reduction
or
changes
in
severity,
so
we
still
feel
the
range
we've
previously
given
on
savings
of ÂŁ15
to
ÂŁ25
per
policy
is
appropriate.
Over
the
next
year
or
so,
as
the
market
recovers
from
some
early
technology
challenges
and adapts
the
new
rules,
the
picture
of
small
BI
will
start
to
emerge
more
clearly.
Moving
on
to
damage
inflation
now,
the
chart
shows
some
steep
increases
in
recent
years.
There's
two
points
I'd
like
to
make
here.
Firstly,
you
can
see
the
inflation
dynamics
shifting
upwards
from
2018.
We
believe
this
is
down
to
the
underlying
inflation
on
repair
costs
caused
by
advancing
vehicle
technology.
Secondly,
you
can
see
inflation
accelerating
again
during
the
pandemic.
No
doubt
some
of
that
is
down
to
some
short-term
issues
in
the
immediacy
of
the
first
lockdown
such
as
extra
cleaning
costs
and
financial
assistance
given
to
some
garages.
However,
I
wanted
to
give
you
some
more
detail
on
what
we
believe
is
shaping
damage
inflation
across
the
market
in
the
next
slide.
Damage
claims
spend
is
largely
driven
by
two
factors,
the
residual
value
of
vehicles
and
the
cost
of
vehicle
repairs.
The
chart
on
the
top
of
this
slide
illustrates
the
unprecedented rise in
residual
vehicle
values
during
the
pandemic.
The
reason
for this
inflation
are
well
documented,
mainly
chip
shortages,
reducing
the
supply
of
new
vehicles
causing
secondhand
values
to
rise.
We're
not
anticipating
the
supply
of
new
vehicles
returning
to
normal
levels
this
year,
but
we
are
expecting
supply
to
gradually
increase
as
the
year
goes
on,
which
may,
in
turn,
reverse
out
some
of
the
inflation
that
we're
seeing.
The
chart
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide
shows
year-on-year
inflation
on
repairs
across
the
market.
You'll
see
the
rise
in
2020
and
2021.
We
believe
that
the
repair
industry
isn't something
of
a
perfect
storm.
Labor
costs
are
increasing
due
to
supply
shortages
caused
by
an
aging
workforce
and
Brexit.
Fuel
and
energy
costs
are
increasing
garage
overheads,
some
of
which
will
have
to
be
passed on
to
insurers.
There
are
challenges
securing
replacement
vehicles
and
driver
shortages
are
making
parts
distribution
challenging.
These
features
are
becoming
more
pronounced
since
the
end
of
2021,
and
we
believe
they
will
continue
to
cause
inflation
repairs
for
much
of
this
year.
Putting
this
alongside
the
rises
in
residual
vehicle
values
create
a
challenging
outlook
for
claims
inflation
in
2022.
Now,
I
want
to let
you
know
more
about
our
strategy,
what's
important
to
us
and
how
that
helps
us
to
manage
these
challenging
market
conditions
successfully.
The
graph
on
the top
left
shows
claims
inflation;
us
versus
our
competitors.
As
you
can
see,
we've
managed
claims
inflation
better
than
the
market.
I
wanted
to
spend
a
couple
of
minutes
letting
you
know
how
we've
been
able
to
do
that.
Firstly,
on
digital and
analytics,
you'll
see
from
the
slide that
we've
seen
good
growth
in
both
analytics
and
digital
during
the
pandemic.
Growth
in
these
two
areas
is
in
line
with
our
focus
on
optimizing
the
combined
ratio,
allowing
our
customers
to
interact
with
us
in
new
ways,
and
also
allowing
us
to
ensure
that
our
staff
can
add
value
on
the
claims
that we
feel
their
expertise
is
most
needed.
Secondly,
I
wanted
to mention
large
BI,
an
area where
we
feel
we
have an
advantage.
I
think the
last
time
we talked
to
you
about
the
experience
level
is
now
large
BI
team.
Since
then,
I'm
very
pleased to
tell
you
that they've
all
got
six
months
more
experience.
We
believe
that
our
people
are crucial
to
our
success
in
large
BI
and
all areas
of
claims.
We
work
with
many
stakeholders
on
large
BI
who
are always
highly
complementary
of our
claims
handling
strategy.
In
short,
that
strategy
is
to
focus
on
very
early
and
thorough
investigations
into
all
claims,
putting
claims
on
the
appropriate
track
as
soon
as
possible.
This
allows
us
to
strike
a
balance
between
investigating
where
appropriate
and
pushing
for
speedy,
collaborative
settlements
wherever
possible.
Finally,
I
wanted
to talk
about
our
customers.
Despite
these
challenging
market
conditions,
we're
getting
consistently
strong
feedback
from
our
customers.
I
mentioned
our
staff
earlier
when
talking
about
BI,
but
I
can't overstate
how
important
their
experience,
dedication
and
expertise
is
to
us.
They
are
there
for
our
customers
when
they
need
us
most,
and
they've
been exemplary
during
a
difficult
couple
of
years.
That's
it
from
me.
I'll
hand
you
back
to
Cristina.
Thanks,
Adam.
Let's
now
take
a
look
at
our
expenses.
As
you
will have
noticed,
our
written
expense
ratio
has
increased
by
1
point.
This
was
a
result of
lower
average
premium,
and
also
it's
due
to an
increase
in our
IT
spend
which
we
think
is
the
right
thing
to
do
for
our
business.
In
the
past
few
years,
we
have
increased
our
spend in
technology
in
areas
like
system
upgrades,
cloud-based
architecture,
investments
in
data
and
digital,
and
cyber
security.
These
investments
have
supported
a
continued
shift
to
digital
channels
that
is unlocking
operational efficiencies,
as
seen
in
the
bottom
graph.
For
the
future,
we
expect
to
continue
to
strengthen
our
capabilities
and
make
further
investments,
in
line
with
the
Admiral
2.0
strategy
that
Milena
has
explained.
To
this
end, our
focus
will
continue
to
be
improving
the
overall
combined
ratio.
Moving
on
to
the
household
book,
2021
has
had
very
strong
results.
First,
significant
increase
in
profits
driven
by
strong
loss
ratio
development
of
prior years,
a
better
weather
year,
and
a
better
claims
outcomes
due
partly
to
the
pandemic.
Also,
our
household book
has
had
another
year
of
high
growth,
helped
by
our
multi-cover
proposition
and a
strong
retention.
Also,
we
continue
investing
in
making
our
household
offering
better
for
our
customers.
And
we
have
expanded
our
digital
capabilities,
which
will
also
help
future
growth.
And
we
have
launched
a
new
claims
system,
which
helps
deliver
faster
claims
outcomes,
improved
customer
experience
and
better
efficiency.
For 2022,
we're
expecting
profits
to
come
under
some
pressure.
Given
that
claims
will
continue
having
high
inflation,
there
might
be
changes
to
claims
mix
post-COVID,
and
we
expect
the
impact
of
the FCA
pricing
remedies
to
lower
profitability.
This is
all
for
UK
insurance
business.
2021
has
been
another
strong
year
for
the
UK
insurance
business.
And
now
over
to
Costi
to
tell
us
more
about
the
international
results.
Thanks,
Cristina.
Good
morning,
everyone.
2021
was
a
year
of
investments
in
international
insurance
to
continue
growing
our
businesses
in
a
healthy
and
sustainable
way.
These
investments
in
growth
as
well
the
easing
of
COVID
benefits
have
impacted
our
short-term
results.
Let
me
start
with
the
long-term
perspective.
We
built
efficient,
customer-oriented
businesses,
strong
teams,
and
we
adopted
competitive
advantages
from
Admiral,
especially
in
risk
selection.
Our
strategy
remains
unchanged,
and
we continue
to
build
on
these
foundations
to
increase
economies
of
scale.
Now
for
the
short-term
perspective,
we
achieved
good
growth,
but
we
have
been
operating
in
competitive
markets
mainly
with strong
downwards
pressure
on
premiums
and
the
gradual
unwinding
of
COVID
benefits.
These
effects
mean
a
decrease
in
profitability
in
Europe
and
an
increase
of
losses
in
the
US.
However,
with
nearly
ÂŁ700
million
in
turnover
and
1.8
million
customers
across
four
geographies,
we
remain
confident
in
the
long-term
trajectory
of
the
business
and
our
ability
to
improve
performance
where
market
cycles
revert.
Moving
now
to
Europe,
as
Milena
mentioned,
COVID
impacts
have
been
sharper
in
Italy
and
Spain,
decreasing
average
premiums
and
lowering
demand
for
new
car
insurance.
In
both
markets,
we
managed
double-digit
customer
growth
and
delivered
a higher
average
premium
than
our
competitors,
all
while
investing
in
expanding
distribution
channels.
France
is
a
bit
of
a
different
story,
as
the
market
was
somewhat
immune
from
COVID
impacts.
Average
premium
slightly
increased
in
the
last
two
years,
though
overall
shopping
declined
and
price
comparisons
quotes
were
down.
In
this
context,
L'olivier
achieved
26%
turnover
growth
leveraging
direct
acquisition
and
efficient
brand
investments,
all
at
higher
average
premiums
than
our
competitors.
We
also
continue
to
cultivate
the
household
business,
which
is
a
large
market
in
France
and
progressive
on
scaling
our
partnership
with
BlaBlaCar,
a
well-known
peer-to-peer
mobility
provider
with
a
large
customer
base
to
engage.
In
all
geographies,
we
continue
to
make
substantial
progress
in
better
use
of
data,
offering
more
digital
services
to
our
customers
and
making
our
technology
platform
more
reliable.
We
now
offer
a
fully
digital
journey
to
report
a
claim
and
thanks
to
artificial
intelligence
algorithms,
we
can
make
an
instant
settlement
offer.
Indeed,
leading
independent
surveys
rated
our
customer service
and
user
experience
among
the
best
in
class
with
both
ConTe
and
L'olivier
winning
top
awards
from
major
consumer
review
sites.
And
we
see
very
positive
outcomes
on
customer
loyalty.
We
continue
promoting
our
unique
culture,
and
we
are
proud
that
our
businesses
are
ranked
in
the
top
tier
of
the
Great
Place
to
Work
with
Admiral
Seguros
notably
number
one
in
Spain.
Before
and
during
the
pandemic,
our
business
has
remained
resilient
and
delivered
efficient
growth
and
positive
results
despite
market
adversities.
Over
the
last
four
years,
we
delivered
our
first ÂŁ100
million on
a
cumulative
written
whole
account
basis
and
there
is
more
to
come.
Although
we
expect
markets
to
remain
challenging
in
the
next
months,
we
remain
focused
on
building
long-term
value
for
the
group
in
Europe.
Moving
now
to
the
US,
our
quick
return
to
pre-pandemic
mobility
patterns
led
to
more
stable
premiums
and
shopping
trends.
In
spite
of
a
hypercompetitive
market,
Elephant
customers
base
grew
by
10%.
On
the
downside,
as
COVID-related
loss
ratio
benefits
ended,
claim
frequency
and
severity
inflation
accelerated,
in
particular
in
the
second
half
of
2021.
We
moved
our
prices
up
significantly
in
the
last
quarter
to
respond
to
this
market
shift,
and
we
have
seen
many
competitors
take
similar
actions.
The
bottom
line
result
is
a
function
of
this
context
and
internal
improvements
of
our
business
foundations
have
not
been
sufficient
to
compensate
for
these
market
headwinds.
The
US
is
the
largest
market
where
we
operate,
and
we
acknowledge
that
it
is
an
expensive
one.
But
we
are
confident
that
we
have
built
a
solid
operations
with
good
insurance
capabilities.
Why do
believe
this?
We
are
making
good
progress,
and
there
are
three
dimensions
where
Elephant
is
doing
very
well,
loss
ratio
improvements,
efficient
growth
and
technology.
More
sophisticated
pricing,
investments
in
claims,
digitization
and
wider
use
of
analytics
made
our
loss
ratio
inflated
less
than
the
market
in
2021,
a
clear
signal
that
we
progressed
on
risk
selection
and
claims
handling.
We
grew 10%
by
shifting
our
acquisition
sources
towards
more
efficient
channels
like
agencies
and
price
comparison
websites.
We
kept
our
acquisition
cost
relatively
flat,
while
the
market
increased
by
12%
in
an
already
very
expensive
environment.
We
have
built
a
solid
technology
platform
which
enabled
all
these
achievements.
We
can
engage
new
commercial
partners
in
a
matter
of
days.
We
offer
a
full
set
of
digital
services
for
our
customers
and
we
are
pursuing
internal
efficiencies
with
more
operation.
We
believe
in
the
importance
of
the
US
market
for
our
strategy,
and
we
continue
to
adopt
a
rational
approach
in
building
a
long-term
sustainable
business.
To
wrap
up,
for
International
Insurance,
2021
was
a
year
of
growth,
investments
and
progress
on
business
fundamentals.
The
easing
of
COVID
benefit
has
impacted
our
short-term
results,
but
our
strategy
is
unchanged.
We
continue
to
grow
economies
of
scale,
with
a
disciplined
approach
to
loss
ratio
to
create
long-term
value
for
the
group.
Thank
you.
And
I
know
pass
over
to
Scott
to
tell
us
more
about
our
Loans
business.
Thank
you,
Costi.
Good
morning,
everyone.
To
start
my
section,
a
few
key
highlights
on
the
performance
of
the
Loans
business
in
2021.
Firstly,
we're
back
to
growth.
The
Loans
book
finished
with
gross
balances
of
over
ÂŁ600
million,
10%
higher
than
our
pre-COVID
peak
and
50%
up
from
last
year.
We're
also
seeing
positive
market
trends
with
comparison
going
back
to
pre-COVID
levels
and
as
a
category
share
going
to
22%
of
all
loan
volumes.
We
also
saw
pleasing
progress
on
our
operational
and
risk
selection
capabilities,
whilst
maintaining
an
appropriately
conservative
approach
to
provisioning.
2021
was
a
year
of two
halves,
however,
different
for loans
with
H2
being
more
positive.
We
started the
year
growing
cautiously
in
H1
and in
H2,
we
grew
more
meaningfully
as
our
outlook
improve
complete. We
finished
the
year
with
good
momentum
for
2022,
with
the
stock
book
of
ÂŁ607
million.
We
also
kept
provision
conservative
at ÂŁ50
million,
and
in
light
of
the
continued
uncertainty
and
economic
outlook,
we
included
ÂŁ9
million
of
post-model
adjustments,
particularly
to
account
for
the
impact
of
inflation.
We
also
agreed
our
second
warehouse
funding
given
us
the
capacity
to
grow
in 2022.
That
takes
our
total
funding
capacity
up
to
ÂŁ1
billion.
Our
adjusted
impairment
charge,
despite
the
growth
in
the
book,
improved
our
P&L
to
a
ÂŁ5.5
million
loss,
which
is
within
the
range
provided
at
the
half
year.
We
are
providing
balanced
guidance
for
2022
in
the
range
of
ÂŁ800 million
to
ÂŁ950
million,
and
we
expect
the
bottom
line
to
improve
assuming
no
macroeconomic
shocks.
I
thought
it'd
be
worthwhile
to
take
a
moment
to
zoom
out
on
the
UK
loans
market
and
highlight
several
trends,
which
I
see
as
encouraging.
Firstly,
a
reminder
of
our
loan
profile.
We're
a
prime-focused
lender
distributing
mostly
through
comparison.
Our
average
loans
size
is
around
ÂŁ8,500,
our
customer
APR
around
8%
with
a
net
interest
margin
of
6%.
The
chart
on the
left-hand
side
shows
the
overall
personal
loan
market
and
a category
share of
comparison
as
a
subset
of
that.
Nowadays,
over
90%
of
loans
in
the
UK
are
distributed
digitally.
What
you
can see
is
that
total
loan
volumes
are
still
under
pre-COVID
levels
and
are
expected
to
remain
there
until
2023.
However,
encouragingly,
the
comparison
market
has
already
recovered
to
pre-COVID
levels,
with
share
increasing,
as
I
mentioned,
now
making
up
22%.
We
continue
to
see
[indiscernible]
(00:42:03) from
both
distributors
and
customers
for
guaranteed
rates
and
acceptance
certainty.
It
is
a
gradual
shift
from
a
teaser
rate,
representative
rate
model
to
pre-approved
guaranteed
rate
model.
The
chart
on
the
right
demonstrates
a
real
example
of this,
showing
Admiral
ranking
top
with
100%
preapproval
and
guaranteed
rate
despite
it
being
higher
than
the
competitor
teaser
rates
being
offered.
This
was
something
that
Admiral
had
protected
being
a
market
trend.
I'd
like
to
move
on
now
to
talk
about
our
underlying
capabilities
and
ultimately
why
Admiral
is
having
success
in loans.
For
those
of
you who
have
followed
our
story
in
2019,
I
highlighted
several
capabilities
which
we
identified
as
success
ingredients
of
the
Admiral
formula
and
which
we
aim
to
combine
to
create
competitive
advantage
in
the
lending
market.
On
the
chart,
you
see
a
demonstration
of
pleasing
progress
on
our
competence
and
risk
selection.
To
show
the
real
performance,
which
is
often
hard
to
see
with
the
forward-looking
provisioning
impact
of
IFRS
9,
we've
taken
actual
defaults
per
annual
cohort
and
divided
by
our
actual
net
interest
income,
which
is
analogous
to
loss
ratio.
What
you
can see
here
is
that
since
2017,
we
have
year-on-year
seen
progressively
improving loss
outcomes
as
we
evolved
our
pricing
capabilities.
Something
which
isn't
on
the
slide,
however
something
which
I
find
exceptionally
positive,
is
the
relative
outperformance
of
our
loan
customers
who
also
hold
Admiral
insurance
products.
They
consistently
outperform
and
in
total
hold
over
ÂŁ35
billion
of
consumer
debt.
Engaging
with
more
of
them
to
better
serve
their
needs
in
the
future
is
a
top
priority.
I
would
also
like
to
mention
another
key
ingredient,
which
is
tight
expense
control.
Our
cost/income
ratio
has
increased
temporarily
in
2022 as
we
invest
for
growth.
However,
over
70%
of
our
customers
are
already
being
serviced
digitally,
which
sets
us
up
well
for
efficiencies, and
I
expect
our
medium-term
operational
cost/income
ratio
to
be
materially
lower
than
legacy
competitors.
As
Milena
mentioned, and
as
I've
grown
to
learn,
what
makes
Admiral
successful
is
that
it does
the
common
things
uncommonly
well,
details
that
find
the extra
1%
to
2%
across
the
whole
value
chain.
Our
goal
in
Admiral
Loans
is to
apply
that
same
rigor
and
focus
to
carve
out
differentiation
and
a track
record
of
outperforming
returns.
With that, I'll pass back to Milena to wrap up.
Thanks,
Scott. Geraint,
Cristina,
Adam, Costantino,
Scott
have
just
shared
with
you
how
we
deliver
great
outcomes
for
our
customer
and
our
shareholders.
But
what
about
the
other
stakeholders?
We
believe
that
holding
the
harmony
of
positive
outcomes
for
all
our
stakeholders,
we
can
succeed
and
fulfill
our
purpose
to
help
more
people
to
look
after
their
future.
As
Adam
explained
earlier,
at
the
very,
very
heart
of
our
success
is
our
focus
on
the
great
people
who
work
with
us
today
and in
the
future
and
who deliver
the
winning
experience
to
our
customers.
These
are
the
key
foundation
that
Admiral
is
being
built
on
from
the
very
early days.
I'm
so
proud
that
we
are
independently
recognized
as
Great
Place
to
Work
year-after-year
and
in
every
country
we
operate
in,
including
being
named
number
one
in
Spain
and
number
five
in
the
UK, and
we
have
received
recognition
for
being
leaders
in
diversity
in
Europe.
We
also
increase
our
effort
to
support
climate
change
and
made
a
commitment
to
be
net
zero
by
2040, with
a
50%
emission
reduction
by
2030.
Finally,
since
the
beginning
of
COVID,
we
made
a
step
change
in
our
investment
to
support
local
communities,
and
we
will
continue
to do
so
in
the
future.
To
conclude,
we're
proud
of
the
growth
and
strong
results
we
have
delivered, which
were
thanks
to
our
focus
on
what
we
do
best
and
helped
significantly
by
COVID
tailwinds,
which
are
clearly
subsiding.
Our
strategy
remains
unchanged
and
is grounded
on
solid
foundations
and
technical
competencies
and
enhanced
data
and
technology
capabilities,
unique
culture
and
strong
team. We
will
continue
to
evolve
to
remain
smart
and
agile
and
navigate
the
change
ahead
of
us,
focused
on
delivering
the
best
outcomes
across
different
countries
and
business
line
and
for
all
our
stakeholders.
Thank
you.
And
with
that,
we're
ready
to
take
questions.
Thank
you.
[Operator Instructions]
Our
first
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Will
Hardcastle
with
UBS.
Oh, hi,
everyone.
Thanks
for
taking
the
question.
The
first
one
is
just trying
to
understand
the
level
of
gap
and
conservatism
in
the –
I
guess,
it's
in
the
underwriting
versus
accident
year,
but
you
also
provide
the
underwriting
years
for
both
the
ultimate
and
the
booked.
I
think
if
I
look
at
it
on
a
different
comparisons,
there's
a
massive
gap.
If
I
look
at
it
just
on
underwriting
years,
it
looks
like
5
points
on
the
initial
strike,
so
down
comparing
to
90%
with
the
85%,
for
example.
Do
you
think
it has
been
booked
fairly
standard,
there's
been
no
change
in
methodology
is
really
the
question
there.
And
then
second
one
is
just
in
terms
of
the
change
being
agreed
terms.
Obviously,
it's
not
now,
but
earlier
in
the
year,
is
there
any
way
that
we
can
sort
of
try
and
discuss
the
quantification
of
the
difference
that
would
give
you
in
a
normal
year?
Is
that
possible?
Thank
you.
So
[indiscernible]
(00:47:54)
Geraint.
Good
morning,
Will.
Yeah,
I'll
do
both
of
those.
On
loss
ratio
margin,
first
of
all, there's
no
real
change
in
the
method,
and
I
think
if
you
do
the
maths
and compare
where
our
underwriting
year
book
ratios
are
at
the
end
of
2021
by
underwriting year, which
you
can
do
from
the
back
of
the
presentation
and
compare
it
to
where
we
were
at
the
end
of
2020. There's
not
really
a
big
visible
difference.
You're
right, there's
5
points
of difference
on
the
current
year
and
actually
not
too
far
difference
on
some
of
the
back
years.
If
you
add
all
that
up,
which
you
sort
of struggle
to
do
with
the
information
we
give,
is
actually
a
very
slight
reduction
in
the
level
of
margin
relative
to
the
best
estimate,
but
not
that
significant.
And
the
method
is
actually
very
consistent –
is
consistent.
I
guess,
just
a
slight
change
and
is
not
coming
throughout
the
years
essentially
or
is
that
more
at
the
back
end,
the
older
years?
Yeah, it
comes
throughout
the
years. I
mean
the
way
we
think
about
it
just
to
measure
it,
took
a
reserve
base.
It's
not
an
individual
year
basis,
and
generally
you
find
that
the
bigger
margins
in
terms
of
percentage
points
are
on
the
most
recent
years.
That obviously
continues
to
be
the
case.
But
if
you
look
at
the
margin
held
across
all
the
years,
it
is
very
slightly
lower
this
year
than
it
was
last
year,
but
not
that
much.
The
second
question is
about
[indiscernible]
(00:49:07)
terms.
We've
got
some
info
in
the
back
of
the
pack
which
talks
about
how
much
of
the
profit
that
Admiral
now
retains
in
the
new
contract
versus
the
old
contract.
And
it
also
talks
about
the
change
in
the
nature of
the
contract
between
co-insurance
and
quota
share
and
so
on.
So
we
can
do
some
illustrative
maths
to
help
you
understand
what's
going
on
there.
Happy
to
talk
to you
about
that,
Will.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Alexander
Evans
with
Credit
Suisse.
Hi.
Thanks
for
taking
my
questions.
Just
firstly,
maybe
on
the
UK
motor
policy
count
growth,
we've
seen
relatively
flat
in
the
second
half.
We've
also
seen
some,
it
looks
like,
pretty
aggressive
players
in
January
in
pricing
as
well.
I
just
wondered
what
your
sort
of
growth
expectations
are
for
2022.
And
then
also
maybe
just
on
inflation,
we've
seen
and
you've
highlighted
higher
claims
inflation
going
forward.
What
are
your
sort
of
expectations
on
your
reserve
assumptions
there?
How
does that
impact
your
large
bodily
assumptions,
and
where
do
you
see
the
inflation
being
most
impactful
for
Admiral?
Thanks.
And
then
maybe
as
well
just
on
sort
of
the
sort
of
expectations,
the
pricing
in
the
market,
I
think
you
talked
about a
few
iterations
of
people
reacting
to
it,
but
just
keen
to
hear
your
thoughts
on
how
you
think
it's
going to
develop
into
2022. Thank
you.
Morning, Alex.
I'm
going
to
focus
on
your
first
and
your
third
questions
because
they're
both
related
to
pricing
and
then
Adam
will
cover
inflation.
When
you
look
at
the
market
in
the
first
half
of
this
year,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
particularly
dynamic.
There's
going to
be
a
lot
of
volatility.
What
we
can
tell
you
about
Admiral
prices
is at
the
moment,
our
Times
Top
is
a
bit
higher
than
it
was
in
the
second
half
of
last
year.
And
again
expectations
for
this
year,
volatility
changes,
we
have
seen
a
lot
of
changes
during
January
and
February
from
competitors.
And
we expect
to
see
the
same
also
when
we
look
at
inflation.
It's
quite
high
this
year.
It
might
continue
increasing
and
we
might
see
also
frequency
coming
up,
which
will
both
have
an
impact
on
prices
in
the
market.
Hi,
Alex.
So
on
claims
inflation,
I
think
we'll
expect
damage
to
be
the
main
driver
of
that
for
the
next
year.
I
understand
why
large
BI
is
getting
some
attention
with
the
changes
in
the
actual industries
over
recent
years.
But
there's
been
inflation
largely
on
care
for
a
decade
or
more.
It's
something
we're
not
used
to.
We're very
happy
to
manage
that.
So,
yeah,
we're
thinking
mainly
the
damage
will
drive
that
this
year.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Your
next
question
comes
from
the line
of
Thomas
Bateman
with
Berenberg.
Hi.
Good
morning, everybody.
And
thanks
for taking
my
questions.
Just
first
question
on
your
kind of
new
[indiscernible]
(00:52:10)
of
products,
can
you
just
give
us
an indication
of
how
they
compare
to
kind of
your
previous
pricing
and
particularly
the lower
or
more
basic
product?
How
does
that
compare
to
previous
iterations
of
pricing?
And
where
are
you
seeing
the
most
demand
out
of
those
different
products?
Secondly,
are
you
seeing
any
decline
on
your
back
book
as
a
result
of
the
FCA
changes?
And
do
you
think
those
new
business
increases
are
sufficient
to
offset
anything?
And
is
that
the
case because
I
think
you
heard
that –
I
think
you
said
that
it
was
lower
profitability
expected
due
to
the
FCA
changes.
Yeah,
those
are
my two
questions,
please.
Thank
you.
Yes.
Morning,
Tom.
The
first
one
was
around
peers
both
in
household
and
car.
We
have
had
peers
in
our
household
products
since
launch
a
few
years
ago,
and
it
has
had
very
good
result.
We
launched
in
car
because
we
believe
it's
a
better
way for
offering
different
combined
products
to
our
customers.
And
this
year
we
have
seen
essentials,
which
is
our
lower-tier
product,
taking
a
bit
of
a
share,
but
I
think
it's
too
early
to
comment
exact
on
the
impact
of
this
product.
In
terms
of
the
back
book,
your
question
was
whether
we
had
seen
decline.
Again
a
bit
too
early.
The
changes
in
renewals
only
impacted
at
the
end
of
January.
We
are
seeing
retention
increasing
for
us
and
we
believe
for
the
market,
but
we
cannot
yet
say
how
much
this
impact
has
been.
And
in
terms
of
lower
profitability,
I
made
that
comment
especially
around
household
in
the
market,
which
is
basically
highlighting
the
fact
that
the
household
market
has
traditionally
very
high
retention,
meaning
they
are
long
books
or
big
books
in
the
market
with
long
tenure
and
I
think
profitability
might
be
impacted.
Okay.
That's
good.
So
just to
be
clear,
you're
saying
that
the
home
market
is
likely
to
be
less
profitable,
but
you're
actually
seeing
a
bit
of
margin
expansion
because
of the
high
new
business
rates
and
actually
on
your
back
book,
you're
seeing
sufficient
new
business
increases?
Yes,
I
believe
some
players
in
the
household
market
might
have
profitability
impacted
because
the
decrease
in
renewal
rates.
And
yes,
to
the
other
comment.
Okay.
That's
really
good.
Thank
you
very much.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
James
Shuck
with
Citi.
Yeah.
Good
morning,
everybody.
Two
questions
for
me,
please.
Firstly,
on
the
– I
suppose
the
book
to
loss
ratios
in
2019
and
2020,
if
I
look
at
how
they
were
booking
at
H1
and
then
the
development
into
full
year.
And
if
l look
at
the
ultimates
as
well
in
the
same
years,
2019
and
2020
and
how
they
developed
through
to
full
year
2021,
I
guess
I'm
surprised
by
the
lower
level
of
development
versus
previous
periods,
both
on
the
booked
basis
and
on an
ultimate
basis.
So
my
question
is
really
do
you
still
expect
the
ultimates
to
be
developing
favorably
over
time
or
are
you
now
booking
those
ultimates
closer
to
actual
best
estimate,
i.e.
with
far
less
embedded
conservatism
in
them?
Second
question,
really
around
guidance
of
2022,
I
know
you
said
that
the
profits
for
the
group
will
be
lower
in
2022
versus
2021.
It's
very
difficult
from
the
outside
really
to
model
your
PCW, the
PYD,
all
these
sorts
of
things
going
through
the
year.
My
question
is,
can
you give
us
some
guidance
for
– are you
still
guiding
towards
low
20s
on
the
PYD?
And
on
the PCW,
should
we expect
that
to
go
back
to
kind of
pre-pandemic-type
levels?
And
any
comments
around
FCA
impact
on
the
current
year
accident
loss
ratio
or
will
that
go
back
to
pre-pandemic
levels
as
well?
Thank
you.
Good
morning,
James. Excuse me, I
think
we
lost
you
after
[indiscernible]
(00:56:28),
but
we'll
go
back
to
that.
I
got
about
three
or
four
of
them,
and
then
we'll
see
where we
go
from
there.
On
PYD
outlook,
I
think
guide
in
the
low
20s
is
probably
okay
as
an
idea,
as
a
guide
for
the
next
year
or
two.
I
don't
see
any
major
change
in
that.
There
is
less
inherent
conservatism
in
our
best
estimates
than
there
was
maybe,
say,
a
decade
ago,
but
actually
no
significant
change
over
the
past
couple
of years
in
that.
I
think
maybe,
James,
you've
been
a
bit
spoiled
by
the
ultimate
loss
ratio
development
and
the
book
loss
ratio
development
in
the
past
couple
of
–
six-month
periods.
In
the
second
half of
the
year,
it
was
lower
than
the
first
half.
That
is
for
sure.
But I
don't think
it
was
really
out
of
line
with
averages
over
the
past
few
years.
So,
nothing
to,
I
think,
of
concern,
I
would
say,
at
all
in
the
second
half of
the
year.
I
think
we've
mentioned
earlier
the
booking
pattern
versus
the
ultimate.
It
isn't really
that
different
at
the
end
of
2021
versus
the
end
of
2020. It's
a
bit
less
conservative, but
really
not
that
much
when
you
measure
the
points
of
gap
between
book
and
ultimate.
I
think
there
was
a
question
on
guidance
for
2022.
I
think
when
we
talk
about
that, it's
important
to remember
the
context,
I
think.
So
our
profits
over
the
past
couple of
years
have gone
ÂŁ505 million
in
2019,
ÂŁ608
million
in 2020,
and
then ÂŁ769 million
in
2021.
The
motor
combined
ratio
reported
for the
last
couple
of years
has
been
around
70%
in 2021
and 2020.
And
historically
it
was
closer
to
80%.
So
there's
clearly
a
very
material
difference
in
2020
and 2021
based
on
COVID
and
the
pandemic,
which
is
not
going
to
repeat
in
2022.
So
that's
the
context.
We
don't
give
– James,
as
you
know,
we
don't
give
profit
guidance
and
definitely
not
a couple
of months
into
the
year.
But
clearly,
you
see
some
of
the
trends
in
the
pack,
some
of
the
data
points.
The
first
pick
of
the
loss
ratio
for
2021
underwriting,
for
example,
is
much
more
in
line
with
the
pre-pandemic
loss
ratio.
So
we're,
I
would
say, more
normal
rather
than
profits
declining,
obviously trying
to paint
a
slightly
more
positive
picture.
But I
think you've
got to
remember
that
2021
and 2020
were
exceptionally
high
years,
which
aren't
part
of
the
ongoing
trend
of
increasing
profits
over
time.
I
think
you got
much
– I
think you
got
most
of
those.
If I could
just
come
back
on
one
thing.
The
FCA
price
walking
stuff,
as
that
gets
reversed
out,
would
you
expect
to
be
booking
a
drag
on
the
current
year
accounting
loss
ratio
from
that
in
2022?
Morning.
Just
to
say
that
I
think 2022
will
be
impacted
by
two
things.
First,
the
change
in
the
prices
because
of
the
FCA
reform,
but
also
a
very
dynamic
and
complicated
maybe
claims
market
given
the
high
inflation
and
possibly
increases
in
frequency.
Just
looking
at
the
FCA
reform,
yes,
we
think
it
will
have
an
impact
in
the
sense
that
renewal
rates
are
going
to
decrease.
However,
the
market
has
a
history
of
being
very
rational
and
therefore
I
believe
in
the
long
term
it
wouldn't have
a
major
impact.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank
you very
much
for
that.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
James
Pearse
with
Jefferies.
Yeah. Hi,
everyone,
thanks
for
taking
my
questions.
So
you've had
a
really
significant
profit
commissions
on
your
quota
share
arrangements
in
2021.
Clearly,
margins
have
benefited
from
lower
claims
frequency
in
the
last
couple
of
years.
And
I
guess
when
that
benefit
falls
away,
would
you
expect
to
receive
any
material
commissions
from
your
quota
shares
in
future
years
when
we
return
to
more normal
margins
under
the
new
terms?
I
guess
I
ask
because
pre-pandemic
the
commissions
from
your
quota
share
arrangements
always
seemed
fairly
minimal.
The
second
question
is
just
on
international
business.
So
in
the
past,
you've
spoken
about
achieving
a €30
million
to
€60
million
annual
profit
by
2022
on
a
rich
and
whole
account
basis.
Is
that
still
the
case?
And
I
think
you've spoken
about
increasing
your
whole
account
share.
And
I'm
just
interested
to
hear
if
that
is also
still
the
plan,
kind
of
what
the timeframe
is
on
that
and
how
you'd
go
about
doing
that.
Thanks.
Hi,
James.
I'll
take
the
first
one
on
profit
commission
on
quota
share.
So
I think
what
we've
seen
in
the
past
is
that
we've
commuted
our
UK quota
share
contracts
after
about
two
years and
that
means
that
the
profit
tends
to
develop
after
that
point.
So
it
doesn't
get
reported
as
profit
commission.
It
comes
through
the
reserve
releases
on
the
commuted
share
of
the
business
line
the
account.
So
pre-pandemic
average
combined
ratios
are
probably
in
the
80s,
so
there's
probably
20 points
of
margin.
So
there
clearly
is
profit
on
the
business
that
we
originally
reinsure,
but
it's
just
the
post
computation
that
flows
into
the
reserve
releases
on
community
reinsurance
line
rather
than profit
commission. And
we
sort
of
expect
that
to
be
the
case
in
the
future
as
well.
We're
certainly
not
expecting
the
disappearance
of
our
margin
from
here
on,
that's
for
sure.
Good
morning.
Costantino
speaking.
So,
yes,
you're
right.
Back
in
2018,
we
shared
an
ambition
to
achieve €30
million
to
€60
million
written
profit
on
a
whole
account
basis
in
2022.
I
would
say
that
we
achieved
this
target
already
in
2019
and
in
2020,
and
then
it
is
too
early
to
make
a
call
on
where
2021
will
land,
and
it's
incredibly
early
to
comment
on
2022.
I
acknowledge
that
since
2018,
the
market
has
changed
with
lower
premiums,
in
particular
in
Italy,
where
we
have
the
largest
operation.
But
the
trajectory
of
our
European
businesses
is
solid.
We
are
growing
nevertheless
challenging
environments
and
we
are
confident
that
we're
building
long-term
value
for
the
group.
Thanks.
Can
I
just ask
a
follow-up
question
on
the
profit
commission
question?
Yeah.
So,
I
guess
that
you're
kind
of
shifting
margin
kind
of
post
commutation
when
it
was
pre-pandemic.
I
guess
if
you're
recognizing
margin
in
the
profit
commissions
in
2021,
should
we
think
of
that
as
a
kind
of
headwind
to
future
releases
on
your
commutated
business
or
is
that the
wrong
way
to
think
about
it?
No,
I
don't think
that's
the
case.
I
think
the
fact
we
recognize
in
profit
commission
earlier
than
usual
on
some
recent
underwriting
is
just
not
an
acceleration.
It's
just
the
different
level
of
profitability
of
some
of
those
years.
So
I don't
think
that's
a
change
in
profit
recognition
patterns
at
all.
It's
just
a
reflection
of
the profitability
in
those
most
recent
years.
So
I
wouldn't say
that's
a
change
in
trend.
No.
Got
it.
Thanks.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Greig
Paterson
with
KBW.
Morning, everybody.
Can
you
hear
me?
Yes.
Loud and clear.
Hello?
Can
you
hear
me?
Yeah,
clearly,
Greig.
Go
for
it.
I
hope
everything's
well.
Three
quick
questions,
two
numbers.
One,
for
UK
motor
2021
on
a
written
basis,
what
was
the
average
year-on-year
rate
increase
that
you
achieved?
And
the
second
question
is
claims
inflation
you
came
out
to
2021.
I
wonder
if
you
could
give
us
a
broad
estimate
of
the
percentage
year-on-year
change.
And
the
third
question
is during
the
presentation it
was
mentioned
that
during
2021
we've
seen
a
lower
percentage
of
large
BI
claims.
I
assume
that
will
revert
back
in
2022, 2023
to
your
normal
sort
of
two-thirds
level.
I
was
wondering
what
the
impact
of
that
mix
change
would
be
have
on
inflation
– claims
inflation
you
came
out
in 2022
and
2023.
Thank
you.
Morning,
Greig. I'll
take
the
first
question,
and
then
Adam
[indiscernible]
(01:04:50).
So
on
price
increases
for
last
year,
what
we
did is
we
increased
prices
in
Q2
and
that
meant
that
for
the
rest
of
the
year,
we
lost
Times
Top,
as
you
could
see
in
the
graph
on
the
slide.
And
our
prices
reflected
the
claims
inflation
we
were
seeing
in
the
market.
I'm
not
going
to
go
into
detail
because
there
was
a
lot
of
volatility.
I
just
want
to
highlight
that
we
maintain
pricing
discipline.
You
can't give
me
a
number
for
the
average
price
increase
year-on-year
for
2021?
None.
Sorry,
Greig. Oh, so...
Hi.
Greig. Adam here.
Yeah,
no
number
on
that
though?
Hi,
Greig,
I'll
go
into
claims
inflation.
So
for
2021,
I
think
we
were
looking
at
sort
of
mid-single
digits
in
terms
of inflation.
We're
now
looking
at
perhaps
mid
to
high-single
digits
for
2022.
I
think
I've
covered
the
drivers
for
that
both
in
the
presentation
and
the
previous
question.
On
large
BI,
it's
very,
very
difficult
for
us
to
predict
that.
I
look
a
lot
of
large
BI
claims
and
they are
hugely
volatile.
I
think
we
saw
less
young
drivers
in
the
market
over
the
pandemic,
and
that
certainly
had
an
impact
on large
bodily
injury,
and
those
make
any
strong
predictions
on
it
for
2022, aside
from
the
fact
that
we're
well
used
to
managing
it
well.
Yeah.
I
mean, if
I
could
just
make
a
point.
When
you're
trying
to
model
the
year-on-year
progression
in
loss
ratios,
if
you
don't
know
what
the
claims –
the
premium
rate
increases
and
other
companies
do
provide,
it
does
really
make
it
difficult
and increase
the
information
risk
associated
with
investing
in
Admiral.
Well,
that's
my
two
cents.
Thank
you
very
much.
Cheers.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Youdish
Chicooree
with
Autonomous
Research.
Good
morning,
everyone.
Thank
you
for
taking
my
question.
I
have
two
questions,
please.
The
first
one,
if
I
could
go
back
on
just
in
the
industry
pricing
in
the
first
couple
of
months.
You
talked
about
high-single-digit
price
increases
in
motor
and
even
higher
in
home.
Is
it
possible
at
all
to
just
give
us
the
split
of
how
new
business
pricing
is
progressing
and
what
renewal
pricing
has
done
in
the
first
couple
of
months.
That's
my
first
question.
And
then
secondly,
just
on
the
international
segment,
I
mean
in
terms
of
the
performance
in
2021,
I
get
the
point
that
COVID-related
frequency
benefit
unwound
last
year
and
there's
more
price
competition.
But
your
results,
if
I
compare
it
to,
let's
say,
pre-pandemic
levels
in
2019,
it's
materially
worse.
So,
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
give
us
a sense
of
the
trajectory
in
the
near term
because
you
mentioned
you're
increasing
prices
significantly
in
the
US,
I
would
think
at
least
that
segment
could
deliver
a
significant
improvement
this
year.
But
what
about
the
European
segment?
Is
that
basically
going to
take
a
few
more
years
before
it
breaks
even
again?
Thank
you.
Morning,
I'll
go
to
the
–
to
answer
the
question
on
prices
in
the
market
in
the
first
couple
of
months
and
then
Costi
will cover
on
the
international
side.
So
what
we
have
seen
so
far
in
the
market
only
relates
to
new
business
prices,
and
we're
pleased
to
say
that
we
feed
on
average.
The
market
has
been behaving
irrationally.
So
we
don't
yet
have
information
on
the
impact
on
renewal
prices.
But
I
am
going
to
assume,
given
what
we
have
seen
in
new
business,
that
in
car
we
will
see
around
mid-single-digit
decreases
in
renewals
and
a
bit
higher
decreases
in
household.
Again,
we
don't
have
this
information
and
it
would
take
a
few
months
until
we
can
know
more
about
what's
happening
in
the
market.
Got
it.
Thank
you.
Morning.
For
international,
I
think
the
angle
that
you're
looking
for
primarily
is
Europe.
So
for
Europe,
I
would
say
that
strategy
is
unchanged.
We
want
to
build
long-term
sustainable
businesses
which
deliver
meaningful
value
to
the
group.
And
we
are
continuing
to
build
scale.
And
this
will
likely
continue
in
the
future.
And
as
a
reminder,
we
are
in
the
toughest
part
of
the
market
cycles
particularly
in
Italy
and
in
Spain.
And
in
addition,
growth
costs
generally
more
in
Europe
than
in
the
UK
because
of
a
less
efficient
distribution.
And
also,
we
are
expanding
towards
new
source
of
traffic
like
agencies
and
intermediaries.
And
we
are
making
investments
for
that.
So,
in
2021,
we
delivered
a
strong
double-digit
growth
in
flattish
markets.
And
we
are
well placed
to
continue
growing
and
hopefully
benefiting
in
the
near
future
of
cycles
reversions.
And,
so
in
summary,
I
would
say
that
the
trajectory
of
our
European
business
is
strong
and
we
will
continue
to
build
scale
and
value
for
the
group.
Thank
you.
All
right.
Got
it.
Got
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Rhea
Shah
with
Deutsche
Bank.
Thank
you.
I've
just
got
two
questions.
So,
my
first
one
comes
back
to
the
FCA
pricing.
Some of
your
larger
peers
have
implied
that
they've
maintained
market
share
at
least
in
motor
in
the
first
couple
of
months
of
this
year.
So
I
just
wanted
to see
if
you
can
give
any
comments
on
your
own
market
share.
And
then
my
second
question
is
on
Admiral
Pioneer.
What
sort
of
trajectory
do
you
expect
for
the
Pioneer
losses
over
the
next
couple
of
years?
Morning.
Regarding
the
first
couple
of
months
of
the
year,
I
could
say
that
our
Times
Top
has
increased
a
bit
when
we
compare
it
to
the
second
half
of
last
year,
and
that
has
translated
into
a
small
increase
in
new
business
market
share.
However,
having
said
that,
I
will
caution
to
read
too
much
into
this.
This
is
going
to be
a
very
dynamic
market
in
the
next
few
months,
and
it's
too
early
to
make
concrete
comments
in
the
first
half
of
the
year.
And
with
regard
to
Admiral
Pioneer,
the
main
intent
of
Admiral
Pioneer
is
really
to
build
business
for
the
longer
run
and
to
do
so
in
a
way
that
is
quite
agile
and
cost-effective.
So
we
have
a
structure
in
place
that
is
really
ready
to
test
and
learn. We
both potentially
fail
and
potentially
succeed
very
fast.
So
we
don't
expect
this
to
be
a
massive
change
in
our
investment
profile
in
the
longer
term.
And
just
as
a
reminder
in
the
past
that
we always
experiment
a
new
product,
a
new
proposition.
We're
doing
this
in
a
way
that
we
think
is
more
effective
and
more
efficient.
We
will
push
on
the
accelerator
when
we
find
something
that
is
very
exciting
and
we
feel
that
we
created
something
special.
But
I
wouldn't
expect,
as
mentioned,
massive
change
to
our
investment
profile
in
the
overall
context
of
Admiral,
probably.
Okay.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the line
of
Thomas
Bateman
with
Berenberg.
Hi,
there.
Sorry.
Me
again.
I
just want
to
come
back
to
the
reserving
question
one
more
time.
2021,
the
loss rate
share
does
seem
very,
very
conservative
at
90%
given some
of
the
frequency
discounts.
I
take
the
point
that
you're saying
margin
is
down
a
little
bit.
I'm
just
trying
to
understand
why.
I
know
at half
year
it
felt
like
you
processed
a
few
more
large
[ph]
BI
(01:12:43)
claims.
So
is
it
to
do
with
that
or
is
it
to
do
with
maybe
inflation
concerns
or
just
kind
of
weak
pricing
in
2021.
Anymore
color
you
can
give on that,
it's
really
great.
And
then
just
secondly
on
the
international
[indiscernible]
(01:12:55)
again,
you
gave the
impression
and
you're
looking
at
more
agents
and
intermediaries.
Is
there
a
slight
change
in
strategy
away
from
PCWs?
Thank
you.
Hi,
Tom.
I'll
do
the
first
one.
So,
the
2021
book loss
ratio,
we've
gone
from
90%
against
the
ultimate
of
85%.
It
tends
to
be
conservative
early
on,
on
the
ultimate
basis,
and
it'll
be
very
conservative
early
on,
on
a
book
basis
that
will
develop
down
over
time.
Is
it
more
conservative
than
usual?
I
think
there
are
obviously
many
things that
go
into
the
determination
of
a loss
ratio.
Frequency
is
one,
inflation
is
another,
weak
pricing,
as
you
call
it,
was maybe a
bit
strong.
Pricing
is
another
factor
that
goes
into
it.
So
all
those
taken
into
account
we've
gone
for
85%
as
the
ultimate
at
this
point,
strongly
expecting
that
will develop
down
over
time.
So
do
I
think
it's
unduly
conservative?
I
think
it's
Admiral-like
conservatism
rather
than
unduly
conservative.
Does that
make sense,
Tom?
Yes,
it
does.
So
that's
in
line
with
you
conservatism,
but
the
margins
come
down,
so
again
why
has
that
come
down?
Is
it
to
do
with
kind
of
the
reserve
releases
[indiscernible]
(01:14:06)
half
year
in
2021
or
is
there
something
else
going
on
there?
No,
not
really. We've
been
saying
for
a
little
while
that we
thought
that
our
margin
was
at
the
upper
bounds
of
what
it
actually
could
be,
and we'd
expect
it
to
come
down
over
time
as
things
were
more
stable
in
the
market.
And
so
that's
what we've
done
at
the
end
of
2021.
There's
no
particularly
dramatic
reason.
Large
BI,
more
of
it
or
less
of
it
isn't
necessarily
a
factor.
What
we're
just
seeing
is
a
slightly
more
stable
outlook
for
claims
into
2022.
And
so
we've
reduced
the
margin
slightly,
certainly
not
materially, and
it's
still
very
conservative.
That's
brilliant.
Thank
you.
And
just
on
the
International
stuff.
On
International,
I
would
say
that
globally
speaking,
the
strategy
is
unchanged
and
we
want
to
be
at
large
and
sustainable
businesses.
But
we
acknowledge
that
distribution
has
some
growth
– well,
direct
distribution
has
some
growth
challenges,
clearly
has
grown
less
than
we
expected
years
ago.
But
we
need
also
to
consider
that
in
Europe,
we
are
observing
different
shopping
behaviors.
And
in
particular,
in
the
low
part
of
the
cycles,
people
shop
less
online.
So
expanding
towards
new
distribution
channels
was for
us
a
good
move,
and
we
believe
that
we
can
deploy
Admiral
competitive
advantages
also
in
this
distribution
channel,
primarily
risk
selection
and
customer
service.
So
we
stay
committed
to
build
long-term
larger
business
towards
distribution
expansion.
Brilliant.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
Philip
Ross
with
Mediobanca.
Hi.
Good
morning.
A
couple
on
[indiscernible]
(01:15:58),
please.
Firstly,
thinking
about
claims
inflation,
it
is
a
bit
elevated
at
the
moment,
but
I
guess
you're
used
to
dealing
with
claims
inflation
over,
say,
6
percentage
points
in
the
chart
you
showed.
How
do
you
think
about
the
whiplash
savings?
Do
you
think
the
sort
of
few
points
sort
of
savings
that
you
expect
to
make
can
help
pay
for
higher
claims
costs
or
is
there
a
sort
of
separate
dynamic
in
the
way
those
savings
might
be
passed
on
through
premiums
to
customers?
Secondly,
on
large
BI,
we
do
continue
to
see,
I
think,
lower
levels
of
serious
injuries
on
UK
roads
and
certainly
on
the
government
data
available
to
mid-year
2021.
Can you
give
us
any
color
on
what
you
see
in
your
portfolio
currently
on
large
BI
and
maybe
just
how
long
those
sorts
of
trends
take
to
come
through
or
to
manifest
themselves
in
reserve
releases.
Thanks.
Hi,
Philip.
It's
Adam
here. On
to
large BI
first,
it's
a
bit
quicker.
I
think
last
year, large BI
was
generally
unremarkable
for
us,
for
the
most
I
can
say
[indiscernible]
(01:17:02)
really.
On
whiplash,
the
frequency
picture
is
becoming
more
apparent,
but
severity
is
still
quite
hard
for
us
to
understand.
As
you
pointed
out
in
your
question,
the
savings
will be
passed
back
to
customers.
We're
certain
the
rate
we've
given
is
good
and
it's
really
hard
to
say
anything
more
than
that
at
the
moment.
But
as
and
when
it
becomes
clear
this
year,
we'll
report
back.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Phil.
We're going
to
move
on
to
webchat
questions.
There
are
a
number
of
questions
that
came
through
earlier
on
pricing
renewals,
FCA.
I
think
Cristina
has answered
all
of
them.
So
there
is
one
on
the
International for
Costantino.
Costi,
you
sound
more
bullish
on
the
US
market
than
ever.
Do
you
feel
you
now
understand
the
nuances
of
this
new
market
well
enough
to
drive
more
consistent
growth
here?
So
on
the
US,
we
have
understood
that
efficient
acquisition
is
key
and
possible
to
achieve
and
that
we
have
built
a
good
operation
with
well-established
insurance
capabilities.
And
we
need
greater
scale.
The
US
is
the
largest
market
where
we
operate
and
it
offers
a
meaningful
opportunity
for
diversification.
As
the
market
is
large,
we
need
a
longer
time
to
develop
a
self-sustainable
business,
and
it
is
worth
reminding
that
test-and-learn
approach
is
in
our
DNA.
And
we
need
to
build
a
greater
scale
and
we
are
conscious
that
acquisition
costs
are
materially
higher
than
the
European
ones.
We
progressively
shifted
towards
more
efficient
source
of
traffic
like
agencies
and
price
comparisons,
which
deliver
a
very
positive
10%
growth
year-on-year.
But
we
managed
to
cap
the
acquisition
costs
flat
when
the
market
increased
by
12%.
Claims
frequency
and
severity
higher
than
pre-pandemic
levels
has
affected
the
results
this
year.
But
the
market
is
quickly
adjusting
the
price
levels
and
to
respond
to
that.
And
we
are
doing
the
same.
So
overall,
I
would
say
that
we
are
making
good
progress.
We're
confident
that
we
have
built
a
good
business
with
solid
insurance
capabilities
like
risk
selections
and
claims
handling,
but
also
with
a
very
good
technology.
So
we
believe
in
the
importance
of
the
US
market
for
our
strategy,
and
we
continue
to
adopt
a
rational
approach
to
growth
and
to
manage
with
discipline
the
loss
ratio
with
the
aim
of
building
a
long-term
self-sustainable
business.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
Our
next
question
is
from
Faizan
Lakhani.
I
think both
for
you Geraint.
The
first
one
is
it
would
be
my
assumption
that
the
2021
underwriting
year
would
still
be
a
very
good
year
given
the
residual
COVID
benefit. And in
conjunction
with
a
new
structure,
I
think
reinsurance
he's
referring
to,
would
it
be
fair
to
say
that
profit
commissions
on
that
year
should
still
be
very
strong
next
year?
The
second
question
is
related
to
household.
Could
you
provide
additional
color
on
how
the
household
insurance
profit
commission
structure
works?
Could
we
see
a
step
change
in
commissions
if
the
combined
ratio
goes
below
a
certain
level?
Thanks,
Marisja.
So
the
–
one
of –
part
to the
first
question
was
about
the
new
reinsurance
structure.
That
actually
only
takes
effect
from
the
2022
underwriting
year.
So
actually
that's
the
thing
for
the
future
– for
the
current
underwriting
year
rather
than
anything
that
will
affect
2021.
And
on
2021,
we'd
still
expect
that
to
be
a
profitable
year,
I
think,
for
sure.
And
it'll
develop
from
where
we've
currently
booked
it
and where
we
currently
projected.
But
clearly, it
will be different
to 2020
and 2019.
So,
the
level
of
profit
commission
you
might
see
on
that
year
in
the
next
12 or
24
months
will
be
lower
in
2020 for
sure.
But
I still think
we'd
expect
to
see
profit
commission come
through
on
that
year
as
it
develops
and it
will,
we
think,
pretty
strongly
be
profitable.
On
household,
we
haven't
disclosed
the
full
details
of
the
contracts.
There
are
a
couple
of
what
have
been
long-term
[indiscernible]
(01:21:07) contracts,
and it
is
the
case
that
the
higher –
the
better
the
margin,
the
higher
percentage
of
profit
that
Admiral
will
make
on
those
contracts. And
you
have
seen
some
of
that
come
through
in
the
last
12 months
in
2021.
Those
contracts
actually
are
starting
to
come
towards
their
expiry
over
the
next
couple of
years.
We'll
be
looking
at
either
extensions
or
different
structures
there
with
hopefully
some
improvements.
We've
not
started
those
conversations
yet.
So
that's
something
to
look
out
for
maybe
in
the
next
couple
of years.
Hope
that
helps.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
James
Pearse
with
Jefferies.
Hi.
Sorry, just
a
follow-up
question
from
me
actually
on
the
internal
model.
I
just
wondered
if
we
could get
an
update
on
the
timeframe
of
your
internal
model
being
implemented.
And
it
also
should
be really
helpful
to
get
some
more
color
on
what
has been
causing
that
delay.
Thank
you.
Hi,
James.
Yeah.
Nothing
really
too
much
to
report
on
that
at this
point.
We're
working
away
on
that.
Team
is
working
very
hard in
the
background
on
it.
When
we've
got
something
really
material
or
interesting
to
say,
we'll
obviously
come
back
and
say
it.
The
reasons
for
the
delay,
I
think
I
spoke
about
either
6
months
or
12 months
ago,
and
they
remain
the
same.
The
scope
of
the
model,
the
platform
was
built
on
the
documentation
around
it,
all
that
type
of
stuff
and
that's
what
we're
working
on.
The
plan's
underway,
but
we've
got
something
to
report.
Obviously
we'll
come
back
with
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
And
our
next
question
comes
from
the
line
of
James
Shuck
with
Citi.
Yeah.
Hi. Thanks
for
taking
my
follow-ups.
I just
had
a
couple
of
things to
return
to.
One
of
them
is
the
topic
of IFRS
17.
I
think
I
asked
the
question
at
the
first
half
results
when
just
thinking
about
the
margin
over
best
estimate
and
the
degree
of
redundancy
that
can
be
booked
under
IFRS
17. And
Geraint,
I
think
you
said
you
wouldn't
expect
any
change
to
the
overall
level
of
reserve
and
conservatism
that
you
book.
I
wondered
if
you
could
just
expand
a
little
bit
on
that
for
me
because
getting
kind of
mixed
messages
from
other
companies
in
Europe
and
in
the
UK
when
it
comes
to
the
degree
of
prudence
that
you
can
book,
partly
because
you
need
to
reserve
closer
to
best
estimate.
So
just
keen
to
get
your
thoughts
around
that
in
a
little
bit
more
clarity,
please.
And
then
secondly,
it's
a
bigger
picture
question
when
it
comes
to
the
2022
outlook
in
the
UK
motor
market.
Admiral
has kind
of
consistently
outperformed
and
done
a
great
job
doing
that
on
a
year-by-year
basis.
Would
you
say
that
2022
is
going
to be
more
difficult
year
to
outperform,
just
given
the
degree
of
dislocation
in
the
market?
Thank
you.
Hi,
James.
On
IFRS
17,
we
don't
believe
there's anything
in
that
accounting
standard
that
says
you
can't
hold
a
conservative
margin
if
that's
what
the
company
decides
it's
appropriate
to
do.
And
given
our
past
track
record,
assuming
we've
got
the
ability
to
do
that
under
the
accounting
standard,
you
might
expect
us
to
take
a
similar
approach
and
maintain
a
similarly
conservative
risk
appetite
on
margin.
So
I
don't
expect
at
this
point
we're
going
to see
a
radical
change
in
the
level
of
margin
that we
hold
in
our
reserves.
The
accounts,
of
course,
will
look
quite
different, and
there'll
be
some
enhanced
disclosure
on
that
level
of
conservatism
in
the
back
end,
I'm
sure.
But
in
terms
of
the
overall
level of
margin, at
this
point,
we're
not
expecting
a
change
in
it.
And
on
your
second
question
on
2022
outlook,
I
think
all
our
comments,
in
terms
of
our performance,
were
compared
to 2020
and
2021.
And
as Geraint
explained,
for
the
last
couple
of
years,
profit
increased
by
50%
and
we had
an
average
combined
loss
ratio
reported
basis
for
UK
Insurance
in
the
50%.
And
so
it
is
really
not
plausible
that
we
will
continue
on
that
phase
unless
there
are
a
very
strong
combination
of
favorable
event.
But
we're
not
in
relation
to
the
market
as
a
whole
where
I
think
we
do
have
a
very,
very
strong
position
where
one
place
would
change
ahead
in
terms
of
FCA
pricing
reform,
as
Cristina
mentioned,
strong
pricing,
strong
foundation.
We
also
have
a
lot
of
other
businesses
that
are
growing
[indiscernible]
(01:25:27)
are
very
excited
about
the
loans
business.
We
don't
talk
much
about
it.
But
it
is
a
very
exciting
opportunity
for
us.
And
we're
very
well
placed
also
in
terms
of
continue
to
be
competitive
in
our
core
markets.
So
just
to
remind
that
with
all
in
the
reference
to
very
exceptional
year,
with
some
feature
of
the
pandemic
that
we
all
hope
are
not
going
to
be
repeated
this
year.
Okay.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
I'll
now
turn
the
call
back
over
to
Milena
Mondini
for
any
closing
remarks.
Thank
you
very
much.
Just
like
to
thanks
everybody
for
your
time,
for
your
questions,
really
appreciate
it.
I
also
would
like
to
really
thanks
my
colleague
and
all
Admiral
employee
and
staff.
It
was
an
exceptional
set
of
results,
record
profit
and
dividend
and
more
importantly
a
great
service
to
our
customer
and
a
lot
of
innovation
and
effort
to
put
us
in
a
good
position
for
the
future.
Very,
very
happy
to
confirm
that
we
can
reward
also
all
our
colleagues
through
the
share
scheme
that
has
been
confirmed
this
year
as
well
with
up
to
ÂŁ3,600
for
all
our
employees
across
the
group
of
10,000 people,
so
thank
you
very
much.
And
see
you
in
six
months.
Ladies
and
gentlemen,
this
concludes
today's
conference
call.
Thank
you
for
participating.
And
you
may
now
disconnect.