PerkinElmer Inc
LSE:0KHE
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
100.004
127.21
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches USD.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Good evening, and thank you for attending today's PerkinElmer Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. My name is Bethany, and I will be your moderator for today's call. [Operator Instructions]
I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Steve Willoughby, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to PerkinElmer's Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. On the call with me today are Prahlad Singh, our President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jamey Mock, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
If you have not yet received a copy of our earnings press release or slide presentation, you may find copies of them on our Investors section of our website at www.perkinelmer.com. Please note that this call is being webcast and will be archived on our website.
Before we begin, I'd like to remind everyone of the safe harbor statements that we have outlined in our earnings press release issued earlier this afternoon and those in our SEC filings. Statements or comments made on this call may be forward-looking statements which may include, but are not necessarily limited to, financial projections or other statements of the company's plans, objectives, expectations or intentions. These matters involve certain risks and uncertainties. The company's actual results may differ significantly from those projected or suggested by any forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors which are discussed in detail in our SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements made today represent our views as of today. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the future, even if our estimates change. So you should not rely on any of today's forward-looking statements as representing our views as of any date after today.
During this call, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures we plan to use during this call to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available as an attachment to our earnings press release. To the extent we use non-GAAP financial measures during this call, which are not reconciled to GAAP in the attachment, we will provide reconciliations promptly.
I'll now turn it over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Prahlad Singh. Prahlad?
Thank you, Steve. At this time of the new year, I think it's always a great time to reflect on the past. When I look back on the last 3 years at PerkinElmer, I see a significant transformation that has taken place, likely the most in the company's 85-year history in such a short period of time, from the changes we made and programs we implemented in 2019 around refocusing our commercial and operating deals to the output from those changes really shining through in 2020 as the company was able to quickly and aggressively react to the challenges and opportunities presented by the pandemic. I think that the PerkinElmer of 5 or 10 years ago would not have been able to respond in such an agile or innovative way as it does today by leveraging our collective know-how and efforts around the globe.
When I turn to reflect on 2021, I think it is clearly the year of portfolio transformation, especially within the Life Sciences business. As part of this transformation, including the addition of 9 businesses over the last year, we are now keenly focused on successfully welcoming more than 2,000 new colleagues to the company and capitalizing on both the commercial and scientific opportunities of the combined company.
Our integration and transformation office, which was established 18 months ago, has been hard at work, ensuring synergies are realized both today and in the coming years. I was very excited, for example, to see all the teamwork that went into the planning and execution of a company-wide innovation summit we held in mid-November at BioLegend San Diego campus. Scientists, executives and other business leaders from across the company all came together for several days to lay the current work for the scientific collaborations which we look to realize across our businesses as well as build upon the commercial opportunities that can be successfully achieved by working together.
So while the external world has recognized a few prominent transformational events, we are also making great progress on our strategic imperatives. 2022 is shaping up to be another strong year of internal innovation for the company with a number of exciting new product launches planned for over the coming months that I expect to meaningfully impact our business moving ahead.
One example is EUROIMMUN's Accentis platform, which is a high throughput random access chemiluminescence platform, targeted towards high-volume laboratories, which will be supported by a strong menu of assays as we move into 2023. With this analytical, we are continuing our commitment to drive innovation as we refresh its portfolio with recent launches such as the NexION 5000 ICP-MS and the Spectrum 3 FT-IR, both of which have been very well received.
This year, the focus is on chromatography. In addition to having just refreshed our LC and CDS, we expect to launch a new GC around midyear. It will be our first update to the platform in over a decade. And I'm excited to see its increased performance, enhanced user experience and robustness provide meaningful and unique advantages to our customers.
Finally, although not necessarily a new introduction, I'm enthusiastic around the potential for our Vanadis platform, particularly in the U.S. market as we expect system placements to continue to ramp up in 2022 and commercial test volumes on the system to more than double.
All in all, we've been very active over the past 12 months adding new pieces to the company. But I think it's just as important to highlight our internal innovations which drove a 15% increase in the number of new product introductions in 2021 and should help drive our organic growth in the years to come.
Just as importantly, we believe a true differentiator for PerkinElmer is that we are now bringing significant value by offering a holistic suite of solutions across our portfolio to help customers solve their most critical challenges. We are empowering entire end-to-end workflows that are helping diagnostic customers reach a wider spectrum of patients in the identification of diseases, improving the pharma discovery workflow or offering a differentiated solution for cell and gene therapy discovery and development.
As the company has grown, I'm proud that we continue to have a keen focus on our people and their development while building a company culture that values one another's diverse backgrounds and perspectives, including the wealth of expertise and talent from all our new PerkinElmer colleagues. From implementing new training and leadership programs to getting a pulse on our employee satisfaction through a recent employee engagement survey, to sharing in our recent collective success through an incremental company-wide end-of-the-year bonus for the second consecutive year, I'm happy to see our strong focus on our employees and the great performance they have delivered over the last several years.
So while I know this has been a challenging last 2 years, I just want to say thank you to all our employees around the globe for helping turn PerkinElmer into such a great place to work while executing at an extremely high level. In addition to our people, the customer experience, innovation and operational excellence comprised this year's strategic priorities that we have laid out for the company.
In terms of the customer experience, we are all committed to serving customers when, where and how they need us. We couldn't have witnessed a better example of this during the pandemic as customers' requirements fundamentally shifted and required new ways of working, innovating and connecting not only for our COVID-related customers but also for those across all our market segments.
When it comes to innovation, we are viewing it from a different lens than perhaps just a few years ago. The beauty of having these additions to the PerkinElmer family means that we can create new leading innovations. We are in the best position yet to bring together cutting-edge science in the emerging needs of our customers. And we do believe that any employee, no matter their role, can and should initiate and advance customer-driven ideas.
Last, but not least, many of you are familiar with the goals we have been driving around operational excellence which encompasses delivering best-in-class product quality, continuously improving processes as well as ensuring seamless and effective execution on our integration priorities.
While Jamey will cover our financials in more detail, as you saw a few weeks ago in our prerelease, our fourth quarter results were again strong and above our initial expectations, despite facing several hundred basis points of supply chain and other headwinds that came in above and beyond what we had anticipated at the start of the quarter. I'm very proud to see how our team is reacting to these challenges and working to overcome them while also handling the increasingly strong incoming demand from our customers which has led to record high backlogs entering 2022, up significantly from a year ago.
This strong performance in 4Q led to our full 2021 non-COVID organic growth coming in at 16%, which was above our previous guidance and more than double the initial 5% to 7% range we projected at the beginning of the year. And as I previously mentioned, this is all with us entering 2022 on a solid footing with very strong backlogs.
So I'm also pleased to share our initial outlook for 2022 which, despite some headwinds likely continuing at least for the time being, is a testament to the company's transformation over the past several years. Furthermore, I believe our performance and expectations moving ahead are proof that we are now able to overcome various cyclical pressures and still deliver on our commitments in a way I'm not sure the company was able to consistently do in the past. Jamey will give you more details. But for 2022, we are working towards delivering upon our goals for 2023 that we highlighted at the recent JPMorgan conference.
As part of this progression to high single digits of organic growth, we are raising our previous assumptions for 2022 non-COVID organic growth by 100 bps to now be in the 6% to 8% range this year. This increased outlook is driven by the very strong demand environment we currently see and the positive contribution from our recent high-growth acquisitions. While we do expect COVID testing demand to eventually fall off significantly, for the time being, it's clear that testing is likely to remain above our post-COVID baseline assumptions at least through the first quarter, and we are assuming at least $400 million of COVID revenues this year. This leads to our initial outlook for adjusted EPS for this year to be in the range of $6.80 to $7.
So as you can hopefully see, we are a fundamentally changed company with a great trajectory going forward while being able to consistently execute and deliver on our commitments. I'm inspired to see not only how PerkinElmer continues to enable our customers to advance their science like never before but also the power of our diverse and talented employees constantly pushing the boundaries of what's possible.
With that, I'd like to turn it over to Jamey to provide more color on our fourth quarter performance and our 2022 outlook. Jamey?
Thanks, Prahlad, and good evening, everyone. Before turning to the financial results, I want to remind everyone that our fourth quarter earnings call presentation has been posted on the Investors section of our website under Financial Information.
As Prahlad mentioned, we had another successful quarter to the closeout of 2021, which again came in above our expectations on both the top and bottom line despite facing some headwinds that were slightly greater than we had anticipated going into the quarter. I think this performance in the face of some cyclical adversity is a proof point of the transformation that has taken place at the company over the last 2 to 3 years not only from a portfolio composition standpoint but also from an operational agility and teamwork perspective. And while supply chain and lockdown pressures are likely to be temporary in nature, new challenges will inevitably arise, but our team has demonstrated the ability to execute and flourish in any environment. I am grateful and proud of their efforts.
Moving to the top line in the fourth quarter. It was great to see both our COVID and non-COVID revenues again exceed our expectations as both our Discovery & Analytical Solutions and our Diagnostics segments came in better than we had expected on a non-COVID basis. I'm also pleased to see our recent additions performing very well and contribute over $150 million of incremental revenue in the quarter, with more than half coming from BioLegend.
Overall, our adjusted revenue came in at $1.36 billion, which was up 1% year-over-year, despite our COVID revenues declining significantly compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. Foreign exchange was a 1% headwind to revenue, slightly worse than what we had assumed at the start of the quarter, while recent acquisitions added 11% to our total revenues, which was in line with our expectations.
When combined with 11% non-COVID organic growth and $336 million of COVID-related revenues, both of which I note are up slightly from our preannouncement from a few weeks ago, our total organic revenues only declined 9% year-over-year despite COVID revenues being down over $200 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2020. This 9% total organic decline came in slightly favorable to the 12% decline we had approximated at the time of our preannouncement.
I'd also point out that the 11% non-COVID organic growth we achieved in the quarter was despite an estimated 3% to 4% headwind from supply chain and lockdown pressures that were above and beyond what we had assumed at the start of the quarter. Also, the Q4 strength was certainly not because of any pull-forwards as we ended the year with our record non-COVID backlog that was up significantly compared to a year ago. So we are in a great position heading into 2022, and we expect to be able to work through some of this backlog in the coming months, which I'll touch on more later.
As to the $336 million of revenue we generated in the fourth quarter from our COVID-related products and services, the contribution from our COVID-related labs was fairly consistent to the third quarter, while our product-related COVID revenue was up mid-teens sequentially, in line with estimated testing volumes to approximately $200 million. As highlighted in our preannouncement, we saw strong COVID PCR test and extraction kit demand throughout the fourth quarter, especially in the month of December as Omicron spread across the globe. For the full year, this brings our total COVID-related revenues to almost $1.6 billion, with the composition evenly split between our labs and product-related revenues.
As it relates to our business segments, Diagnostics generated $710 million of adjusted revenue in Q4, which represented 52% of total revenue and was down 17% year-over-year. Organically, the business declined 20% due to the lower COVID revenues year-over-year. On a non-COVID basis, our Diagnostics revenue grew 14% year-over-year, with all 3 franchises growing double digits led again by applied genomics. Geographically, the strength in our Diagnostics business was evenly spread across the globe, with each of our major geographic regions growing double digits. For the full year 2021, our Diagnostics segment total revenues grew 42% and was up 35% on an organic basis as our COVID revenues were up nearly 50% from a year ago.
As it relates to our applied genomics business, which falls within our Diagnostics segment, total revenue declined significantly year-over-year due to the drop in COVID revenues but grew more than 30% on a non-COVID basis. Given this consistently strong non-COVID growth throughout 2021, our applied genomics business was up more than 50% last year on a non-COVID basis. Of note, we are seeing strong demand for our JANUS liquid handlers amongst biotech customers and clinical NGS providers. While we expect our applied genomics business to remain strong in 2022, we anticipate top line growth rates to normalize after the outsized growth this past year.
In our immunodiagnostics franchise, total organic revenue was down slightly more than 20% year-over-year in the quarter due to the reduction in overall COVID revenues compared to a year ago. However, on a non-COVID basis, organic growth was up low double digits globally despite facing a larger-than-expected impact from COVID-related lockdowns, especially in China.
EUROIMMUN also continued to grow double digits in Q4 and finished the year with greater than 20% organic growth both on a non-COVID basis. Its integration of IDS, which we acquired back in mid-2021, is off to a great start with joint commercial activities already underway.
Oxford saw strong growth in 2021 and performed in line with our expectations for the year as some headwinds from lockdowns in certain regions were offset by increasing traction of its COVID-related T cell assays, which are being used in research to better understand post-vaccine and post-infection potential immunity by both vaccine manufacturers and government agencies.
As it relates to our reproductive health franchise, while we have continued to face significant pressures from lower overall birth rates in some regions, such as China, over the last few months, we have started to see in some developed markets, including the U.S. and parts of Northern Europe, birth rates begin to flatten out or even increase compared to last year. While it is much too early to determine if this is a durable trend, it is encouraging to see some stabilization after consecutive years of mid-single-digit declines in birth rates.
Our reproductive health business performed well with low double-digit non-COVID organic growth, both for the quarter and the full year, driven by continued market penetration, menu expansion, strong growth in our lab business and an increasing contribution from our noninvasive prenatal testing offering, Vanadis.
Turning to the Discovery & Analytical Solutions segment. The business generated $655 million in revenue in the quarter, which represented 48% of total revenue and was up 30% year-over-year. Organically, the business grew 9% led by strong growth in our Life Science business amongst our pharma biotech customers which grew in the low double digits.
Despite the strong Life Science growth in Q4, we are entering the new year with a backlog in the business that has more than doubled that of the year ago and more than triple what it was heading into 2020. So it really points to the strong demand environment for the business but probably even more so the market share we believe we are taking.
I think this is a strong proof point that our complete pharma discovery workflow solutions for these customers are really resonating from content development with BioLegend to target identification, to our high-content screening offerings through to our preclinical in vivo imaging offerings which are allowing us to provide our customers a more complete research workflow. These offerings were obviously bolstered over the last year via the additions of Horizon, SIRION, Nexcelom and, of course, BioLegend. More specifically, Nexcelom saw record quarterly revenue in Q4 while BioLegend continued to grow strongly in the double digits, contributing $80 million in revenue in the quarter.
Through this transformation, we've taken a set of industry-leading small molecule preclinical offerings and have now transformed them to be well positioned to provide strong solutions to our customers working in biologic environments.
Outside of life sciences, we saw a strong finish to the year in our spectroscopy instrumentation business, which also grew in the low double digits year-over-year. Growth was led by sales into industrial accounts, which were up nearly 20% year-over-year led by our ICP and IR offerings which we are seeing strong demand from a number of areas, including semiconductors, batteries, testing for emerging contaminants in the environment.
Looking at the company overall from a geographic standpoint in the quarter. We saw double-digit non-COVID growth in the Americas and APAC, while Europe grew in the high single digits. China grew in the high single digits despite being impacted by both lockdowns within Diagnostics and supply chain pressures within DAS.
Operationally, we performed well despite the aforementioned macro variables. We were able to generate adjusted operating margins of 34% which, while up significantly from pre-COVID levels, were down from the year ago levels due to the unfavorable mix impact of lower COVID revenues versus 2020. We continue to invest strongly in the business and the team did a good job of managing through inflationary pressures which we have seen continue into the new year. In an effort to offset these pressures, we began to implement significant pricing actions in the second half of last year which we expect to translate into a net pricing impact in 2022 greater than what we have traditionally experienced.
Moving to below the line items. Our adjusted net interest expense in the quarter was $26 million, and our adjusted tax rate was 25%. The better-than-expected top line and strong margin performance led to fourth quarter adjusted earnings per share of $2.56, which was solidly ahead of our $2.05 guidance. For the full year, we generated adjusted earnings per share of $11.36, which was up 37% year-over-year. Free cash flow was again very strong in the quarter, coming in at $303 million, which translated into 94% conversion of our adjusted net income. For the full year, adjusted free cash flow was nearly $1.4 billion with over 100% conversion of our adjusted net income.
So I'm really proud of the performance the team has been able to accomplish here as we've done a much better job with our collections in particular and have vastly improved both the absolute performance and the consistency of our free cash flow generation over the last 2 to 3 years.
The strong cash flow allowed us to begin our deleveraging process in the fourth quarter as we were able to reduce our net debt by over $250 million as compared to the end of the third quarter. This leaves us with a current leverage ratio of approximately 2.2x net debt to EBITDA, down slightly from last quarter. While our leverage improved sequentially and remains below our desired target of 3x, we do expect our leverage to increase over the coming quarters even as we continue to pay down additional debt as we expect our absolute EBITDA performance to come down as COVID tailwinds subside.
So now moving on to guidance. As you saw a few weeks ago at the JPMorgan conference, I'm happy to reiterate that we were already able to increase our medium-term 2023 outlook for total revenue, organic growth, margins and adjusted earnings per share. The highlight, in my opinion, is that we now expect our core growth to be in the high single digits in 2023 and beyond.
As it relates to this year, we are providing initial 2022 guidance for non-COVID organic growth to be in a range of 6% to 8%, which includes the impact from our recent acquisitions rolling in throughout the year, with BioLegend only contributing to our organic growth starting in the fourth quarter. With an estimated contribution from M&A of approximately 7% and assumed 1% headwind from foreign exchange and at least $400 million of COVID-related revenue, this brings our expected total revenue in 2022 to be in a range of $4.42 billion to $4.50 billion. I'd note these assumptions did not account for any incremental lockdowns and/or any COVID-related disruptions.
As it pertains to our COVID-related revenues, within the at least $400 million contribution we are projecting for this year, we are cognizant there is a wide range of potential scenarios, but we are assuming approximately $240 million occurs in the first quarter. This is down from the $336 million we generated in the fourth quarter of 2021. Our guidance assumes there are no additional variants that caused significant spikes in testing. And so that by the second half of the year, testing subsides and we reach our terminal level of COVID-related revenues of approximately $25 million per quarter.
Depending upon the level of PCR testing demand over the coming months and the durability of our various COVID-related lab contracts, it is possible our expectations could prove conservative. But we believe the at least $400 million is a comfortable level at this point. However, as we and most others have seen during this pandemic, projecting future testing demand, out more than a month or two, is quite difficult and we prefer to plan with a more cautious approach.
In terms of earnings, we are expecting to be able to deliver adjusted earnings per share this year of between $6.80 to $7, which equates to nearly 20% CAGR since 2019. This assumes approximately $105 million of net interest and other expenses, an adjusted tax rate of 20% and our average diluted share count being in the range of 126 million to 127 million shares as we continue to expect to offset compensation-related dilution.
For the first quarter, we are projecting reported total revenue to be in the range of $1.17 billion to $1.19 billion, which consists of non-COVID organic growth of 7% to 9% and M&A contribution of 11%, a 2% headwind from foreign exchange and the $240 million of COVID-related revenue, which are down $310 million from the year ago period. We did the 7% to 9% non-COVID organic growth assumption as a modest amount of benefit from working through a portion of the current record high backlogs. That said, moving forward, we hope to run the business with a higher absolute level of backlog than we have in the past which, I believe, will further improve our ability to consistently execute towards our goals.
In terms of adjusted earnings per share for the first quarter, we are forecasting a range of $2.05 to $2.10, which assumes $27 million of adjusted net interest and other expenses and an adjusted 21% tax rate and a diluted share count of 126 million to 127 million.
And while we are not providing quarterly guidance at this time for the remainder of the year, I would point out that we will be facing our most difficult year-ago organic comparison in Q2 for this year for your modeling purposes. All of this guidance is detailed on the second to the last page of today's presentation that is on our investor website as well.
In closing, a year ago, I described the year 2020 as likely being one of the most important in the history of PerkinElmer and that I felt we were much better positioned as an organization heading into 2021. After completing the addition of 9 new businesses to the PerkinElmer family over the last 14 months, while also continuing to make significant progress on our internal strategic imperatives, I will repeat my comments from a year ago in that I think 2021 is likely going to go down as one of the most important years in the history of PerkinElmer. And I know we are much better positioned as an organization heading into 2022.
And with that, operator, at this time, we would like to open up the call for questions.
[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Dan Arias with Stifel.
Jamey, maybe just to start with the guide for the year. What is the op margin outlook that's assumed under the $6.80 to $7? And then along those lines, are you able to split out what's due to mix versus other factors, like investments and such? Obviously, the impact of the changing COVID testing profile on profitability is a focus. So I know testing is a moving target. But any help that you can give us there as we just sort of think about how that shifts would be helpful.
Sure. Yes, Dan. So the operating margin assumption is in the high 20s, let's call it, 27%, 28% overall. And much of it is due to mix. Obviously, we've got COVID going away at relatively high margin rates and then growth in the core and M&A coming in at still 40-plus percent incremental, so that overall gets you to the 27-ish percent operating margin rate. And in terms of driving productivity, I think it's everything that we've always been talking about. We've got a lot of programs going on, both with our procurement teams, with new product introductions and reconfiguring, everything that's going on with services acceleration. And then, to your point, we did make a lot of investments over the last year. We took some of the COVID profits to invest in the future and things like R&D, in selling and marketing, digital and information technology and people. And so those will more normalize as we head into 2022. And so we feel confident that 27% is achievable here.
Yes. Okay. And then maybe on the Diagnostics side, specifically EUROIMMUN. That was a mid-teens grower in 2019 before COVID entered the picture. Can that business get back to those levels or something close this year on the non-COVID side just given that I think you're guiding each geography with double-digit growth. It sounds like you're launching some new products there and, presumably, conditions should continue to improve here. So just wondering how you kind of presume the trajectory that you had before COVID entered the picture.
Yes, Dan. I think our assumption going into -- as you pointed out, EUROIMMUN has always been a double-digit grower, and our assumption is that it will continue to be one in '22 and beyond. I think the only caveat I will say, a lot of that obviously is dependent on what happens with COVID. There are severe lockdowns and, obviously, autoimmune takes a backseat. But assuming, as we have assumed, that things will start to normalize into the second half of the year, that will be a double-digit grower.
Our next question is from Vijay Kumar of Evercore.
Maybe, Jamey, one, I'll start with the guidance here, and I have one for Prahlad. The guidance, simplistically, you guys said 16% base growth, organic growth, in fiscal '21, and you're guiding to 6% to 8%. That feels like it's coming in a little bit better than what we were expecting given the comps here. I think you mentioned backlog here, orders coming in above. Maybe talk about your backlog and how much visibility is that giving you to this high singles growth. Also maybe talk about pricing. I think you made some comments on pricing, price actions you took. And why is it prudent to assume no impacts of lockdown just given, I think you mentioned, 3 to 4 points of impact in Q4?
Vijay, there's a lot in there. So I don't think it should be a surprise, the 6% to 8%. I think we've been saying, look, the base business before our acquisitions could grow 5% to 7%. And we said that by 2023, we'd be high single digits. And along the way, in 2022, we'll have a lot of these acquisitions come in throughout the year. And that's the first part of the step-up. In fact, on a pro forma basis, with our acquisitions, we are actually high single digits with this guide. So the 6% to 8% is just BioLegend coming in, in the fourth quarter; several others coming in, in the first through the third quarter. So hopefully, it's not too much of a surprise.
And I think just generally speaking, as we step back from it, I think the end market seems strong. I mentioned our backlog is strong. We're not expecting a lot of the backlog to flush this year. Pricing has an upside lever to it as well. But the difference between the 5% to 7% and the 6% to 8% is really all in DAS or same thing on a pro forma basis. If you go back, we said DAS could be mid-single digits in the past and yet Diagnostics could be high single digits. DAS is now moving to mid- to high single in this guide. And on a pro forma basis, it is a high single-digit guide. So overall, I hope it's pretty consistent with what we've been guiding people over the next couple of years.
And just to add to that, Vijay, this is probably another proof point that we are on our way to the high single digits growth that we said for 2023. As you recall, 3 weeks ago, we said at the JPMorgan conference that we'll be 7% to 9% in '23. I think our story of being in the midst of the transformation is over. Our transformation is completed, and we are starting to see the benefits of all the hard work that has gone on over the past 2, 3 years. So I think moving forward, as we move into 2023 as a high single-digit company, this is the next step in that direction.
That's helpful commentary, Prahlad. Maybe one related to that question on your '23 comments, right, I think at JP, you guys said $7 of earnings or north of 7% with margins of like 26%. I think if I'm looking at your base implied margins here for fiscal '22, I think you guys were already at 23% op margins here for the base business, with BioLegend being incremental. Maybe talk about your margins, visibility into margin trajectory, that 26% you laid out for fiscal '23. And then BioLegend is still expected to be $380 million of contribution in fiscal '22. I thought Q4 perhaps came in a little light.
I don't think Q4 came in light.
Yes. Q4 came in right as we expected, Vijay. So BioLegend overall still hit $320 million of revenue for the year and was up 33% versus the prior year.
And we've said $380 million for the year. That's consistent and strong. Well, I think to your bigger question really, Vijay, that you asked, I think the way to think of it is that for us, and both Jamey and I have pointed out, 26% is just a midpoint into our journey as we continue to transform the company. This has really changed. We are now better equipped to overcome cyclical or other challenges. Essentially, Diagnostics and Life Science is 80% of our business. I think that's the piece that I -- and I continue to communicate to you guys that this is a company that is now going to be a high single-digit growth company, which is going to deliver margin in the late 20s. And we are at a point where essentially, you know what we have forecasted for the next 24 months, if you look at what we have pointed out for '22 and we just pointed out where '23 will be for us at JPMorgan. So I think I couldn't be prouder of the story that we have. We are sitting here to communicate on behalf of our 16,000 employees today.
Our next question comes from Dan Leonard of Wells Fargo.
Just a couple. First off, on pricing power. Can you elaborate a bit more on how you feel about pricing power across the enterprise and perhaps quantify the greater pricing you expect to capture in '22?
Yes, Dan. So a big portion of our business, as you know, is on reagent rental. So to the extent that they are coming up for renewal, we can effect those. But much of our business is under 2-, 3-, 5-year contracts. Otherwise, though, historically, pricing has been, we've called it less than 100 basis points, maybe 50 basis points. And while we don't want to guide specifically or say exactly what our pricing power will be, it's going to be, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, substantially more this year. And we've been having conversations with our customers, our commercial team. As I've mentioned in the past, there doesn't seem to be a lot of pushback. So we feel confident in having a lot more pricing power this year to the extent that we can effect it in certain contracts.
And then a follow-up, Jamey. There was a lot of discussion on backlog in the prepared remarks. It was unclear to me how much of the strength in backlog was due to the supply chain issues and ability to fill all the orders by year-end versus core organic backlog growth. Is there any way you could elaborate on that further?
Yes. I would say the supply chain issues, Dan, were a relatively small component of our backlog growth. So to put that into perspective, our backlog is up 50% year-over-year, and it's the strongest it's ever been. So yes, supply chain played a small role in that, supply chain pressures and pushouts, that is. But overall, the demand on all the end markets is extremely strong. Both instruments and consumables are up substantially, so not a huge impact on backlog.
Our next question comes from Derik De Bruin of Bank of America.
I wanted to follow up on Dan's question. So across the life sciences industry, everyone is talking about just gaining share, and not everyone apparently can gain share. I mean is it just the fact that the markets are much stronger than they have before and we're sort of in the next level of demand versus everybody claiming they're taking share from everybody else? I mean I'm just trying to understand the dynamics because the growth for most companies is doing a lot better and were sort of that -- you would think that a lot of catch-up spending is done. So it's more of a commentary on the broader end market outlook that you're seeing. And then that goes to the next point on this one, like how sustainable is this? I mean are we in a new -- is the market now 4% to 6% growth where they were historically, particularly in the DAS segment?
Yes, it's a great question, Derik. But I think the starting point, obviously, is that the end markets are strong, but I think 2 other factors to consider. One is it depends on which space you are playing in. We've sort of ring-fenced the areas both in life sciences and diagnostics where we are playing. We are not sort of a provider for everything for every customer, right? And I think whether you look at it in preclinical discovery, either on the small molecule side or the biologics side, we have sort of built our forte in that market, just like on the diagnostics side, we've done with reproductive health or immunodiagnostics. So I think both of those play a role. And then the fact that we've consistently been able to put solutions in front of our customers, I mean, if you go back and recall what we presented 3 weeks ago, the examples around how we are building a total solution, workflow solution, around infectious diseases with Oxford assays or around applied genomics. I think the answer to your question really is, yes, the end markets are strong, but I think also the fact that we are now able to bring a portfolio which our customers want is also playing a role. Anything else, Jamey?
I think that's it.
And the pricing gains that you're seeing, I mean do you expect those to be sticky into 2023? I'm just wondering, is there some deflation at some point where you have to give price back?
Hard to say, Derik, at this point. I mean I think, overall, the value proposition of our products is quite strong out there. So you would hope that much of this sticks and remains moving forward.
So we hadn't heard you guys talk about Vanadis in a while but would love sort of like an installed base update, how you're competing against some of the NGS players, just sort of a little bit deeper in that one and sort of what can that contribute to the reproductive health business. And then I'll get off.
Sure, Derik. I mean I think, as I've mentioned, we are sort of trying to stay away from providing numbers and how many units we are installing. But as I have pointed out earlier, we have a very strong pipeline. We've started shipping equipment and instruments, and we are doing a lot of validations across several sites. I think our expectation, I would say, from a commercial perspective, that we'll double our volume in 2022. But I think, more importantly, it was the fact that you pointed out around some of the other players. And I think there has been enough information out there around the press that sort of validates our product segmentation that we were trying to do with Vanadis when we launched it, i.e., provide OB-GYNs and our customers with a solution that is easy to put into action and implement and, more importantly, focus on what matters, which is 13, 18 and 21. And I think you have seen hopefully enough news and articles around that, that helps validate that assumption that we made going into -- with Vanadis. And I think it's going to be a big driver for us to bring reproductive health into mid-single digits.
For sure.
And what's the price point of Vanadis test versus an IPT? And I really am done -- with the sequencing based on IPT.
Absolutely, a great question. If you are going to do $5,000 to $10,000 per test, it's $100 per test versus what you get from NGS, which is several hundred dollars.
Our next question comes from Catherine Schulte of Baird.
Congrats on the quarter. I guess, first, one of your COVID testing peers provided a framework for thinking about COVID testing upside's potential drop through to EPS just given there's such a wide range of outcomes here. Is there a way to frame that for you guys? Like each $10 million of COVID upside would yield an additional $0.03 of EPS or something like that.
Yes. Catherine, thanks for the kind remarks. I would say COVID has pretty fairly high incrementals. So without giving specifics, we have been saying it's north of the Diagnostics gross margins, not a lot of extra selling cost to it. So I think that should give you some math in terms of what an extra $100 million could be. It could be $50 million to $60 million of operating profit and then tax effective, it does come with a higher tax rate. Most of the jurisdictional incomes are a little bit higher than where we play and where our mix is. So hopefully, that gives you a little bit of color there.
Yes, helpful. And then can you quantify, of the 3 to 4 points of supply chain and lockdown headwinds, how much of that was really lockdown related? And it seems like there should still be some lockdown impact in the first quarter. So what are your assumptions there in the 1Q guide?
That's right. Yes, it will remain in the first quarter here, to your point, we've taken that into account in our guidance. But I would say the lockdown impact as opposed to supply chain disruption impact is maybe 1/3 to 40% of that overall number. So call it 1 point to 1.5 points.
The next question comes from the line of Josh Waldman with Cleveland Research.
Just 2 for you. First, I wonder if you could comment on recent trends within the food business. I know, last couple of quarters, that business has been growing mid-single digits, maybe a bit below the DAS average. Are you seeing backlog build in that business as well? I know you called out seeing backlog build in Life Sciences but wondered if you're seeing backlog build in the food business.
Yes. So it has been growing nicely. It's coming off a relatively easy comp in 2020, Josh. But as we've mentioned in the past, we've done a lot with our food business, and it's really comprised into 3 areas: our food safety business, which is doing extremely well, particularly in China with our Meizheng business; food quality, we've had some historical issues, but I think we've started to right the ship there; and then cannabis which, as you know, was significant in the year 2019, which is why the 2020 numbers looked pretty rough. So overall, I'd say there's signs of life in cannabis. I would say food safety is doing extremely well, food quality is doing well and, overall, for the year, grew mid-teens, I think. And I think as we head into 2022, we're very confident. So we're going back to our historical guide of, say, 6% growth in food. But I think there's plenty of reasons why there could be upside there.
And in terms of backlog, yes, we had the backlog grow in our food business as well. It too was impacted a little bit by supply chain. So it was both supply chain pressure plus demand increased our backlog in the food business.
Got it. And then can you provide some additional context on what you're seeing in China from an end market perspective? I guess what level of growth are you expecting from that region kind of within your '22 guide?
Yes. So China has been extremely strong for us. I think for the year, it did 20% or 24% growth, something like that. And that was obviously off an easier comp in the year 2020. But as we head into 2022, we're thinking high single digits. So we are still factoring in some concerns around COVID and, particularly, in our EUROIMMUN business. As you might remember, Diagnostics makes up a larger portion of the mix in China. So reproductive health and the birth rate pressures that we've seen in China dragged that down kind of in the high single digits versus, historically, we've been seeing double digits. So in this guide, we're thinking high single digits overall, Josh. Life Sciences has been extremely strong. Applied genomics has been extremely strong. But as a percentage of the overall business, it's a little bit smaller.
The next question comes from the line of Jack Meehan with Nephron Research.
I wanted to continue on the China discussion but just more focused on a reflection on the fourth quarter. It's still early in earnings season but haven't heard other companies really talk about disruption in the region, and we'll have to wait and see what others have to say. But I was just curious if you could elaborate a little bit more on some of the headwinds you saw in the quarter and what might have been unique to PerkinElmer that others haven't called out yet.
Yes. I would say 2 things, Jack. In our Diagnostics business, EUROIMMUN obviously plays a big role. And when we saw Omicron lockdowns affect the month of December, we started to have a pretty dramatic impact, some in autoimmune but largely in other infectious disease and allergy, which is a big portion of the EUROIMMUN business over there, number one. And then number two, supply chain still affected our business over there. So the global applied backlog, global food backlog, global life sciences backlog, every region was impacted as a result of that. So we saw it both on the Diagnostic side as well as some of the instruments on the DAS side.
But I think, Jack, more importantly, if you just look at the macro factors for China for us, that continues to be a growth market for us. That's not going to slow down. If you look at the -- one of the bigger challenges for us for some time, as you know, has been the birth rates. I think it's going to, hopefully, [ pulsate the button ]. The government is putting enough incentives. And our hope is that as the party meets again in August, this summer, they are going to put more incentives into play for people to have kids. So either from immunodiagnostics -- and as Jamey pointed out, Diagnostics is a big piece of our play there. That market is not going to slow down. And we haven't seen any impact as such that it would.
Great. And as an unrelated follow-up for you, Prahlad, a lot of commentary in the script about -- obviously, you guys were active with M&A in 2021. Curious just level of appetite for more deals in 2022. And on a similar vein, given the discussion around women's health, reproductive health, Vanadis, what's your level of appetite for doing deals kind of in the specialty lab space to maybe help bolster that strategy?
Yes. I mean I think there are 3 questions in there, Jack, in terms of our ability to do M&A, in terms of the timing on that and in terms of the space, right? So I think we both said pretty clearly that I think our focus right now will be on debt repayment and ensuring that we get back to the leverage that we are comfortable in, as we've pointed out. So once we do that and once we get to a position where we do M&A, you will see more of it in the spaces that we have played recently. In the Life Science segment, if there are any holes in our portfolio, we'll continue to fill that and bolster that; and on the Diagnostics side, around infectious diseases. As you know, we've now got a significantly large installed base of new customers, and we need to fuel that engine. So similar to what you saw with Oxford around tuberculosis or with ideas around endocrinology, we will continue to bolster our portfolio on assays on the Diagnostics side.
The next question is from the line of Patrick Donnelly with Citi.
Jamey, maybe one for you on the backlog piece. I know you talked about it being at a record and then, going forward, planning to run the business with a bit higher level of backlog than in the past. Can you just talk about -- maybe help frame that, whether it's a magnitude of where we are today or kind of how much larger you're looking to go in the future. And then again, just wondering how much that will improve the visibility and transparency going forward.
Yes. I mean I don't want to give too many specifics here, Patrick, but I would say it's material particular to the businesses where we sell instruments. And that's now 20% to 25% of our overall revenue, just to put that into perspective. So if we're $5 billion, $1 billion, $1.5 billion is what we're talking about here. And instruments provide good visibility and, I think, consistency in our ability to meet what we say we're going to do here. So I'd say it's a relatively high portion of that overall segment. On the consumables side, that's much more flow. And even though the backlog did increase, like I mentioned, that just already has some level of consistency to it. So I don't know, that's a little bit more color, but I think that level of backlog affords us the visibility to consistently execute what we say we're going to do.
That's helpful. And then maybe just one on BioLegend. It sounds like your revenues are tracking pretty much where you guys expected. Can you just talk about the synergy opportunity here now that we're, what, 5 months, I guess, since you closed it, both on the cost side and revenue side? I know, obviously, it wasn't a cost synergy deal. And you guys wanted to invest in the R&D side there. But maybe just talk through that. And then the margin profile, I think it's a little over 40% op margins, where those could go as well would be helpful.
Yes. So like you said, Patrick, this is not a cost synergy play whatsoever with BioLegend. We plan to continue to invest in the business. And we did say, yes, operating profits is in the high 40s. I think they can continue to tick up as they get more volume leverage, for sure, over time. So nothing has affected our overall 50 to 75 basis points beyond 2023, and BioLegend fits into that. I'd say as we look at 2022, commercial synergies is what we're looking at. We've mentioned 5 years out, we could have $100 million of annualized. And so I don't think it will be perfectly near $20 million in the first year, it might be half that from a synergy perspective. But I think the teams are already working together. There's been a lot of training sessions, a lot of different discussions around how to execute, how to quote, et cetera.
And then on the innovation side, I think that's what's more exciting. I mean Peter Wrighton-Smith talked about Oxford and being able to use some of their antibodies and were starting to look at that and, Prahlad mentioned, we had our summit recently. I think if you look at the innovation side, wrapping not only BioLegend but Nexcelom, Oxford, SIRION, Horizon, we have some serious plays be able to make a difference in cell and gene therapy, our continued Discovery business, more on the biologics, as well as Diagnostics. So I think the technology and innovation play is probably more exciting in the longer term.
Yes. And Patrick, just to add to that, I think the benefit that BioLegend brings -- short term or near term, as Jamey pointed out, the revenue synergy is an obvious one as we expand it into geographies where they don't play a role. But I think mid- to longer term, the opportunity that BioLegend gives us is that it gives us several shots at the goal. It's not just one shot. It's on the Diagnostics side, whether it's with EUROIMMUN or Oxford; and it's on the Life Sciences side, whether it's with Cisbio or Nexcelom. So the benefit that BioLegend gives us is that it gives us opportunity to realize the product synergies and technology synergies with several of our businesses rather than any 1 or 2.
The next question comes from the line of Matthew Sykes with Goldman Sachs.
Just 2 quick high-level ones for me. Just one on DAS. You spent a lot of time over the past year, a couple of years, improving the business from an operational efficiency standpoint but also, obviously, putting in acquisitions. I'm just wondering, it sounds like you feel like you've set that business up very well for future growth. When it comes to profitability, are there still areas, like OneSource comes to mind, where you feel like you can still get some levers on increasing margins from an operational efficiency standpoint? And could you just comment on the progress you think you've made to that point and how much more there is maybe to go for in that?
Yes, Matt. So I still think there's a large amount of opportunity in the DAS business for margin expansion. You mentioned OneSource. So I'd say that's number one. And we've talked a lot about everything we're doing around services and software that we invested in. I would say life sciences as a whole also has a lot of leverage. So as we grow the volume there, I think we have additional upside on the leverage line for life sciences, in particular. And then analytical or applied markets, I mean I've mentioned a lot about how we're trying to redesign the products, how we're trying to sell more consumables. So I think all 3 of our end markets, food as well, all have opportunity. And I would say, generally speaking, we're probably in the third or fourth inning maybe, to use a baseball analogy here. So I still think there's plenty of runway in the DAS business.
I think just taking the -- I mean the natural progression of it has happened, Matt, because as we've evolved the portfolio, in the DAS side, if you just put Life Sciences and informatics together, that's close to 70% of the business now, right?
For sure. Yes.
I mean I think that itself is a big needle mover around the operating margin for the business.
Yes. On a pro forma basis, Matt, Life Science is 68% of the revenue of DAS that's going here. So I think that helps for sure. And that's really what's moved from mid-single digits overall to, on a pro forma basis, DAS had a high single digits overall organic growth perspective.
Got it. That's very helpful color. And then just lastly, just on reproductive health. You talked about perhaps some stabilization in the birth rates, particularly in Asia. But if that were to prove to be stubborn and not stabilize or grow, can improved utilization and menu expansion fully offset that impact if it's sort of declining at sort of similar rates we've seen and not get worse?
Yes, there are 2 levers to it, right? Obviously, one that you're talking about, Matt, is the geographic expansion that we would be able to offer in place. But also the recent new NPI launches that we have had from a menu expansion perspective, whether it's around DMD, around SLA, around X-ALD, as they start gaining traction and as more and more states, for example, in the U.S. and in Europe start adopting those, that will help. But I think the biggest driver for reproductive health in 2022 and beyond is still going to be Vanadis. And I think as Vanadis gains traction, as it gains adoption, that is the needle mover that will bring reproductive health back into the mid-single digits.
Totally agree. Two things. One clarification, Matt. We didn't say APAC birth rates have normalized. In fact, China continues to be a significant drag. It was in the U.S. we saw some inflection points, perhaps, I wouldn't call it an inflection point yet, but maybe there's signs here, as well as certain parts of Europe. So that's clarification number one. We're still banking on the fact that China has been going down. To Prahlad's earlier point, at some point, it should hit bottom. And then the second thing, just to reemphasize what Prahlad said, I mean even if you look at our 2-year stack in reproductive health, to your point, we've been able to offset significant declines in birth rates. On a 2-year stack basis, we are low single digits. So we're already doing what you said. And then if you add to it Vanadis, like Prahlad said, that gets you back into the 5% to 10% range. And if birth rates normalize, that's only upside to this as well.
Our last question is from the line of Max Masucci with Cowen.
So you're entering 2022 with increased exposure to a wide range of next-gen proteomics and bioprocessing applications. So in those 2 areas, can you call out any specific products that you expect to become more meaningful revenue contributors throughout the year, whether it's antibodies for upstream and downstream, proteomics applications or even cell culture media and other GMP-grade products for bioprocessing?
Yes, Max. As you know, we don't play in cell culture media or in the bioprocessing side. But as you pointed out, on the antibody side for proteogenomics, that's one of the fastest-growing markets or segments of BioLegend. And I think that's the opportunity that we have. So from a near-term perspective, that's what we would see. Anything else, Jamey?
I would just say, I mean I agree, we don't play a lot in bioprocessing and cell culture, I mean a small degree in Horizon to some point, and I think we see a little bit of prospects there. But that's that.
Okay. Got it. And then one final one here. You're leveraging BioLegend's reagent capabilities in a partnership with a next-generation flow cytometry company that has increased multiplexing capabilities. So understanding that the partnership is just getting started, it would be great to hear what your expectations are for that partnership in 2022 and then, maybe just more broadly, whether you see additional opportunities to optimize and merge your reagent offerings with other life science instrument companies and similar partnerships.
Yes. I mean, Max, I think BioLegend has had very good partnerships with Cytek, as you are saying, 10x Genomics and several companies. And I think that's going to continue. There's no reason that's going to stop. But I think the one that you are pointing out, that's in its initial stages and it's just beginning. So it's tough to sort of give any quantification or any more certainty around that. But obviously, it's a natural fit with the flow cytometry instrument company, and that's the opportunity that they are trying to leverage.
There are no additional questions waiting at this time. I would like to pass the conference back over to Prahlad Singh for any closing remarks.
Thank you, operator. In summary, this is a very exciting time for PerkinElmer. In many corners of the company, we are moving the needle, both in science and health care, and we are pursuing important external collaborations that we've talked about today with global health care networks, governments, organizations and most reputable partners, key opinion leaders and influencers across our markets. But more importantly, we feel like we have built a greater sense of purpose, energy and team work. I'm confident that 2022 will be an exciting year as we have all the pieces in place to drive towards our vision of being a champion for growth.
Thank you for your time this evening, and have a great evening.
That concludes the PerkinElmer's Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. I hope you all enjoy the rest of your day. You may now disconnect your lines.