Banco Santander Brasil SA
BOVESPA:SANB3
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
52 Week Range |
11.93
15.27
|
Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches BRL.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Good morning, and thank you for waiting. Welcome to the conference call to discuss Banco Santander (Brasil) S.A.'s results.
Presenting here are Mr. Angel Santodomingo, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; and Mr. André Parisi, Head of Investor Relations. [Operator Instructions] The live webcast of this call is available at Banco Santander's Investor Relations website at www.santander.com.br/ir where the presentation is also available for download. We would like to inform that questions received via webcast will have answering priority. [Operator Instructions]
Before proceeding, we wish to clarify that forward-looking statements may be made during the conference call relating to the business outlook of Banco Santander (Brasil), operating and financial projections and targets based on the beliefs and assumptions of the Executive Board as well as information currently available. Such forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions as they refer to future events and, hence, depend on circumstances that may or may not occur. Investors must be aware that general economic conditions, industry conditions and other operational factors may affect the future performance of Banco Santander (Brasil) and may cause actual results to substantially differ from those in the forward-looking statements.
I will now pass the word to Mr. André Parisi. Please, Mr. Parisi, you may proceed.
Good morning, everyone. It's my pleasure to welcome you to Santander Brasil's earnings conference call. We had another solid quarter, which will be presented by our CFO, Mr. Angel Santodomingo.
Before moving on to the quarter's highlights, I'd like to remind you that Santander Brasil will host our first Investor Day in October 8 when we celebrate 10 years as a listed company. It'd be a great opportunity to discuss with the top management about the strategy, trends and opportunities. We will provide further information in the coming months.
Now I turn you over to Mr. Angel Santodomingo.
Hello. Good morning, everyone. It's a pleasure being with all of you this morning again. Today's agenda, as you may see, I will start with key messages with a look at Santander Group's results, which were presented this morning. Next, I'm going to provide a quick overview on the macro outlook of Brazil, which will be followed by our quarter results. And to wrap it all up, I will finish with the presentation with some -- the presentation with some concluding remarks on the main topics that we will be discussing today.
So going to the next slide. First main idea is that our profitability remained solid. In first Q '19, we delivered 21.1% return on equity, maintaining the same high level as last quarter and being the highest level for our first Q since our IPO 10 years ago. In the following slides, I will elaborate on the reasons that sustained this positive performance. But in a nutshell, I will say that P&L operational leverage, coupled with tightly controlled provisional expenses, was key to our success this quarter. We have achieved top of class in both efficiency and recurrence ratios, as you may see in the slide. I would also like to draw your attention to the fact that we distributed BRL 1 billion in dividends, in fact, interest on capital, in the first Q of this year, which compares to BRL 60 million in first Q '18 and close to BRL 500 million in first Q '17.
On Slide 6, we show that our good performance is a response to our efforts to continually improve the experience of our customers and engagement level of our employees. As I have mentioned in past quarters, customer satisfaction is a cornerstone of our strategy to keep growing in a consistent, sustainable and profitable manner. We keep track of our progress in this field through the NPS, the Net Promoter Score, that you already know, which increased by 10 points compared to first Q '18 and a couple of points versus last quarter, reaching 59 points.
As we arrived to these high NPS levels, it is obviously more difficult to keep on showing strong improvements. In any case, we are absolutely convinced that the positive evolution in this indicator is one of the main pillars that have helped and is helping to drive the expansion of our customer base. I should also note that, in our view, with continued dedication, engagement and commitment of Santander employees -- the continued dedication, engagement and commitment of Santander employees have been instrumental to the sustainability of our business.
Next slide shows that we remain focused on gaining profitable market share in both assets and liabilities. Let me go through the different product vehicles. Our vehicle platform, combined with our risk-based pricing, remains the backbone of our success. We have been developing solutions to strengthen our leadership such as the latest new website platform within WebMotors. We engage and empower customers and dealers with a multidisciplinary platform that gathers solutions to enhance the entire car buying and selling journey.
Cards. Our offer of differentiated products for each niche in the best credit card app in the industry, Santander Way, helped us deliver another solid quarterly performance.
Payroll loans. We reached market share slightly higher than 10%, quite a positive evolution when compared with close to 0%, 0%, I repeat, in 2014. Our digital platform has definitively contributed to this achievement, along with our strategy of increasing the number of companies and municipalities that we process payrolls for.
Getnet. Even considering an intense change in the competitive environment, we keep gaining and leading market share at a profitable level. Here, it is important to understand the full spectrum of the bank-customer relationship. We consider Getnet a crucial component of our plan to leverage the bank's revenues. And last but not the least, agribusiness that our expansion process continues on track as part of our plan to expand into Brazil's inner side.
On Slide 8, we underline the foundations why Santander continues to be a growth story. We have 1 external variable, the macro environment, that obviously will help structurally our evolution. On top of that, we have 4 forces within our structure that should keep on following our growth: efficiency, cross-selling, expansion of our ecosystem and new businesses within them -- within it.
In line with this, we made 2 important launches in first Q: a, our open investment platform; and then an employee's benefit solution company currently offering meal and food vouchers. These products offer customers attractive conditions, and we are confident that they will achieve outstanding results in the coming quarters and years. We are also about to begin our operations at Santander Auto, our joint venture with the insurance company, HDI, to provide auto insurance.
On the next slide, you may see part of Santander's ecosystem devoted to innovations. It shows 3 different examples of products that we offer: SuperGet, Superdigital and Prospera. These are great services on a stand-alone basis, as you may see by the numbers we show, with good growth realities, that when combined, they end up as a strong offer. As an example, we can see the platform that we have built to support Natura's sales representatives. With our POS, they no longer need to handle cash, and with access to microcredit, Prospera, we can leverage sales, all connected to a digital account with a Superdigital card. We are planning a large, much simpler and secure with an integrated solution. Same thing, for example, happens with our recent offer of our mini POS.
We are moving to Santander Group results that were presented today, and I'm not going to elaborate too much on that. The net profit for the first Q reached EUR 790 million. This quarter, Santander Brasil represented 29% of the group's earnings, showing the relevance of the Brazilian subsidiary results for the group.
On the back of a well-behaved inflation -- moving to macroeconomic slide, of our well-behaved inflation dynamics in tandem with the maintenance of sound performance of the balance of payments, Brazilian economic fundamentals remain positive, although probably at lower-than-expected levels compared with some months ago. Economic activity has showed a slower-than-anticipated recovery trend, and market participants are probably looking forward to seeing concrete progress as far as the agenda of structural reforms is concerned, which has prevented confidence indicators from improving further.
Moving to the next slide. We present to you our net profit evolution. In first Q, net profit reached BRL 3.5 billion, increasing 22% year-on-year and 2% Q-on-Q. This performance come as a result of our well-defined strategy, focus on profitability, improving customer perception of our services and constantly increasing the base of active customers. At the same time, we keep focused on maintaining our risk models among the best-in-class and our relentless effort towards efficiency gains. As a matter of fact, the number of active customers grew for the 46th consecutive month, leading to a solid and sustainable revenue growth, allowing us to gain profitable market share.
On Slide 16, we present the main lines of our results, about which I will go into more detail later on. Considering that there is always some seasonality in this quarter, let me highlight the following figures: On the revenue front, NII remain practically flat relative to fourth Q as the increase in credit NII was partially offset by a reduction in deposits NII.
Fees decreased 4% in the quarter. We did mention seasonality effect that is traditional in this quarter. In a year-on-year comparison, fees grew 10%, maintaining a solid performance. And on the expenses side, after the hike I commented last quarter on provisioning expenses, it decreased 13% in the quarter, reaching a level more in line with previous quarters. P&L expenses growth was above inflation driven mainly by higher administrative expenses, but it still remained below total revenues growth pace. In the quarter, it decreased 7%. I will elaborate on the main concepts in the following slides.
On the next slide, we show our NII evolution, which totaled BRL 10.8 billion in first Q '19, increasing 6% in the year. Highlights are: Credit NII expanded 1% in the quarter, impacted by a lower number of calendar days, while it increased 9% year-on-year, reflecting a solid loan portfolio expansion. Revenues from funding decreased 4% Q-on-Q, explained mainly by spreads and average volumes. And the others [ concepts ] are recorded in line with the last 4 quarters' average.
In Slide 18, we can see that our loan portfolio increased 11% year-on-year and 2% in the quarter, reaching BRL 311 million. Individual segment continued to deliver a strong performance, increasing 3% in the quarter and 20% in 12 months. Credit cards, personal and payroll loans were the main growth drivers. Consumer finance also delivered a solid performance year-on-year, expanding 18%, powered by what I mentioned before, our successful digital platform and individual pricing model. The SME portfolio continued at a good pace, expanding by 9% year-on-year. The Q-on-Q comparison was impacted by seasonality in the quarter as SMEs demand more credit to meet end-of-year impacts. And finally, the corporate portfolio, which is still lagging due to the capital markets activity and our profitability-oriented strategy.
On Slide 19, you can see how our funding has evolved. In a yearly comparison, funding grew positively, with the highlight to the positive performances of savings and time deposits, growing 12% and 20%, respectively? At the time, the only negative performance occurred in the most expensive instrument, financial bills or letras financeiras, which presented a 4% contraction. On the quarter, it increased 1%, being adequate to support our loan book growth for the coming quarters.
Now let's talk about commissions. In our view, fee revenue performance is highly linked with NPS. It comes as a result of adequate pricing and raise in funds service, quality and related loyalty, fast increasing transactionality. In a yearly basis, total fees increased 9.5%, with a positive performance on cards, current account and insurance. The 4% drop in the quarter is attributed in general to seasonality in different products like cards and insurance. Even considering a more aggressive competitive landscape in a few products, we remain confident that fee revenues will continue to present a good growth level this year. Here, since we offer a full range of banking products and services, we recognize that it is important to understand the full relationship with each client.
Now let's turn our attention to asset quality. Short-term NPL is stable around comfortable levels. As a matter of fact, the 1.8% in the 15 to 90 days NPL of corporate and SMEs that we present to you in this quarter is the lowest level in our history. In the individuals' segment, the short-term NPL deteriorated 20 basis points due to the seasonality, the normal seasonality of this first Q. And NPL over 90 days remained flat at quite reasonable levels. In our view, this performance is a clear evidence that our risk models are highly profitable, giving us confidence to keep on growing our business. Coverage ratio decreased to 195%, remaining at a comfortable level and preferably adequate to our risk exposure. Here, back book and front book dynamics explain part of this evolution.
Moving to the next slide. Loan loss provisions, net of recoveries dropped 13%. This good dynamic led to a substantial improvement in our cost of credit, reaching 3%, which is the best level through our past years. This, combined with our good loan portfolio growth and fees evolution, is an undisputable evidence that we are able -- that we are on the right track to keep on delivering a profitable operation.
On Slide 23, we analyze how expenses have evolved. Industrialization of process continues among the bank's top priorities. We focus on cost discipline and a lean mindset. Total expenses dropped by 7% in the quarter, attributed to seasonality in both personal and administrative expenses. In the year-on-year comparison, administrative expenses grew 13% on the back of a greater level of transactionality and activity of the bank, while personal expenses remained flat.
The next slide brings our performance ratios into the spotlight. All in all, these metrics have shown good evolution. The efficiency ratio improved almost 20 basis points year-on-year, reaching 39.8%, below 40% -- the 40% level. The recurrence ratio totaled 88.8% in the quarter, achieving an all-time high level, a historical level in efficiency ratio here. Both ratios are top of the class compared to what we know today as public figures published by our peers. As I mentioned before, thanks to all these advances, return on equity kept the same 21.1% level in the quarter as in 4Q, the highest level since our IPO 10 years ago.
Moving to capital and liquidity. We continue to present solid numbers. Our funding stood at a comfortable level with our loan-to-deposit ratio of 92.4%. The BIS ratio, the Basel ratio, is at 15.4%, bringing our core equity Tier 1 at 13.2%. As I have commented earlier, we have substantially increased our distribution of dividends, interest on capital through -- in this quarter to BRL 1 billion. It's almost double of what we were paying 2 years ago.
Okay. As we wrap things up, I would like to highlight that we remain committed to keep on delivering a solid profitability in a responsible way, always considering our clients, employees and shareholders. To conclude, I share with you the main highlights: total revenues growing 7% year-on-year, reflecting customer and profitability focus; risk modeling, assertiveness shown by our asset quality indicators; productivity consistently enhanced, leading to a better efficiency ratio; and lastly, a 22% net profit growth in the year, resulting in more than 21% return on equity for the first Q. In our view, these figures are undisputable evidence that we are well positioned to keep on delivering solid and sustainable results.
I would like to thank you, everyone that is attending the call, and pass the word back to André Parisi. André, over to you.
Okay. Now we are going to take questions we received, and the first one, I will spread in 2 parts, it's from Thiago Batista from ItaĂş BBA. What are we expecting for SME loans until the end of this year? Do you see the price competition in the acquired business impacting credit origination in this segment?
Thank you, Thiago. As I mentioned, on top of the seasonality effects, what we seen -- what we saw in the quarter on the year with SMEs is that they have been gaining momentum throughout the different last quarters in terms of volume. This probably goes with the economic activity and the need as we will go forward of new investment from this part of the -- from this segment of the business.
Now let me elaborate a little bit on the spreads, and because, probably, we'll have more questions here, so I can address the spread issue. What do we -- and the volume issue. What do we see at the NII level? What we see is that volume keeps on coming in, specifically more on the retail side and less as we move to large corporates and corporates, probably because these last ones, they have alternative funding ways. But again, volume still is there.
In terms of the spreads, we've seen pressure in the spreads by segment but specifically also as we move to corporates and large corporates. And there, our policy is to keep on with the mindset focused on profitability. Specifically in SMEs, it is true that we haven't seen a strong pressure in terms of the spreads. I don't see too much of a contamination coming from the acquiring market. That is probably another discussion in terms of discount of receivables, MDR and rental rates.
But the point here, probably the capacity of each bank and specifically for ourselves, to position the product and the service with a wide range of offering for them. I mean SMEs, at the end of the day, depending on the size because, I mean, SMEs are very kind of profound word, I mean, because you're speaking from the individual company, individual person company to company that may have close to BRL 200 million of income, of revenues.
But, I mean, in general terms, they need a full range of products. It is not about funding. Funding is there depending on their credit profile, et cetera, but funding is there. It is more about how did you position the bank with them, and this is where we are clearly putting the focus. We already reached, I mentioned last quarter, more than 1 million clients here, and we are trying to improve that part of the package of offers to offset potential churn and/or the spread pressure in the future.
Second part in regards Getnet. Recently announced the [ D plus 2 ] for some new low-end clients. Is it possible to see an upscaling to SME clients for this price scheme?
Well, what we announced and what probably triggered part of what we are seeing today in the sector is what we have been discussing that could happen in the acquiring system -- on the acquiring sector for a long time now for years. And I have been sharing with you during the last quarters, which is more competition and more -- trying to be more aggressive in terms of positioning each of the different products and services.
Let me share with you what we did some weeks ago, is what -- we offered the possibility for the long tail for the segments that are close to the mass market -- closer to the mass market a [ D plus 2 ] capacity with a rate of 2%, both on credit and debit. It is the lowest offer today. It is profitable for us. It is clearly profitable. We have been obviously making remarks to make it profitable. And it is profitable for the client. So we saw that there was a clear opportunity there, and that is why we have gone into that. We are selling more than double what we used to sell in terms of POS, and we are clearly linking much more clients.
And what I will also like to underline here is that it is a transparent offer. What this means is that what we are offering to our clients is exactly what is being said in the offer. I saw I think it was yesterday by [ Next ], which is the association of small companies, an assessment by which how the different kind of marketing campaigns were being perceived, and the one from Santander Brasil was clearly marked as transparent for the clients.
So this is the offer. And what we are trying here is to position ourselves, and you will see more things coming in, in the next months and quarters. I'm sure about that. Positioning ourselves in this part of the segment -- in this part of the market, sorry, in this segment, in terms of being able to capture profitable, and I underline profitable markets there.
So this is our strategy. We are not moving anymore in terms of additional offers for the time being. And we really expect to have a nice growth rate here.
Last point here so that I can address probably other questions around Getnet. Important point here is to understand. First, Getnet is part of our offer; second, Getnet is integrated in the offer. It's not only part of the offer, it is integrated in the offer, which means that Santander clients tend to see that product as another product.
So what we are trying here is to leverage the capacity of selling that product as well as we see other cellular products. And this is not new for you because I have said this in past quarters, it is already some time, I have mentioned this for a long time now, it is some time in which we have been investing in Getnet in 2 directions. First, diversification. You cannot count on 1, 2 or 3 single sources of revenues. This has been an investment we have been making for some time now, and I have shared this with you, as I mentioned. Second, cost -- unit cost of operation. We have been investing strongly in being efficient so that today, I may say that we have not only one of the lowest of the lowest cost per unit in each of our transactions, which leads to the profitability I was mentioning before.
Okay. Next question is from Jorg Friedemann, Citi. Cost of risk, actually, the lowest level in 4 years, with NPL creation reducing 10% in Q-on-Q. How sustainable do you think these trends are? Could we continue seeing additional improvement on cost of risk and asset quality trends considering that retail represents more than 60% of the loan book?
Okay. Cost of risk and what is -- I think -- I mean this goes back a little bit. This goes back like 5 years already. But I think we have shown a strong capability in terms of risk models. I think this is a fact already. This is not something to come. This is not a compromise or -- it's always something that is being delivered. I mean we continue to focus on risk models, risk understanding, risk behavior, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. But I think we can today say that we have a stronger risk modeling capacity.
So yes, cost of risk has gone down. And this has been at the same time that as you mentioned in your question, Jorg, at the same time that the mix has been moving towards more retail, which is even stronger in terms of the capacity of the cost of risk being controlled. And with an NPL formation that keeps on -- depending on the quarter, at around 1%, 1.2%, 1.3%, 0.9%, 1.1%, around 1-point-something percent. So it's not about the NPL formation. It's not about trying to lower the cost of risk. It's just that we have understood or we think we are understanding the way risk works.
Now looking forward obviously the mix continues to change. We have some pressure there, but it has to do with mix. I don't see in each of the segments a kind of a deterioration that I will have to underline today. You have ups and downs. You have different behaviors depending on the month, depending on the kind of offers that you make, depending on the quarter, depending even in geography. I mean you have all these kind of behaviors that are difficult to understand if we -- I mean, in a nutshell, in 2 minutes' explanation [ I can't ] answer your question.
But again, NPL formation controlled, cost of risk controlled by segment probably going forward. Why not? Depending on the mix. If you asked me this question 12 months ago, probably I would have said the same thing because it is true that the mix is -- puts pressure here, but we have been able to couple with that.
And the structural answer also to this is, is the country going into a lower cost of risk going forward? Well, that would clearly depend on the economic behavior on this structural reforms agenda, if they are achieved, how they are achieved and how they impact confidence and quality. For us, there is a clear valuable that is much more -- I mean, that we have to watch closely, which is confidence. In the world that confidence recovers or regains a positive trend, I will say that we will have volume expansion and good cost of credit.
Next question is from Eduardo Nishio, Brasil Plural. Your loan mix has changed substantially, with individuals growing 20% year-on-year, consumer finance 18% year-on-year, while corporate shrinking 4%. When do you think NIM will start to expand? This quarter, your NII growth is still running below credit growth. Can you comment on that, please?
Well, I addressed a little bit on the spread side. What I see -- I see means on the asset side with some pressure because of the spreads, and at the same time, it will go into volume growth. Both variables go into a direction that we put pressure on NIMs. So again, I don't want to repeat myself in terms of segment. I already elaborated on the different segments how they are evolving.
In terms of NIM, I see more stability or even positive evolution on the retail side, while I see the contrary as we move to large corporates. But again, all segments will be different -- with a different pressure, with different behavior, but with some pressure in general terms.
How do we compensate that? We will try to compensate, as I always say, with NII coming from the deposit side, from the liabilities, it's still not there, but we are working on that, and obviously, profitability coming from fees. So it is at the mix I mentioned that with quality, mix has changed. If we go back not only 1 year, as you have mentioned, I mean, if we go back 2, 3 years, 60% of our balance sheet in terms of credits was retail, and today, it's 72%. So we have had an intense or a sustainable change of mix that, as I said before, we have been able to go through with a stable cost of risk or a low cost of risk.
But I will say going forward, I see these forces stabilizing, again, with some difference in the coming quarters. But at some point, with economy -- let me put this hypothesis on the table, with economy growing and with the capacity that today is available, both in terms of unemployment and industrial capacity that is still below average, I think the total capacity is 76% compared to 80-plus percent that we have had in the past. When we close those gaps in the following, I don't know, if quarters or year plus, we will probably start to see investments coming back, and then we will see volume coming back again and probably time of balancing or stabilizing the difference in between retail and the corporate world.
Next question is from Mario Pierry, Bank of America Merrill Lynch. It seems that economic recovery this year is losing some momentum. At the same time, your asset quality is improving. How does that change your risk appetite? What kind of loan growth can we expect for the year? How do you describe the competitive environment in Brazil today? And are there any concerns about fintechs becoming more active?
Thank you, Mario. Okay. Economic and asset quality. An economic environment and asset quality. I mean I mentioned in my script, it is clear that the expectations of growth that the market had 3, 4 or even 2 quarters ago have been reduced. I mean what -- the market was probably thinking 2-plus percent, 2.5% GDP growth, and today, we are more in the 1.5% area, which means that, probably, volumes compared to what was thought these 3 to 6 months ago will probably be below our average.
Here, you have 2 things, I would say. You have, first, the reality. I mean in nominal terms, GDP will be growing, I don't know, somewhere around 6-plus percent, which means that volumes at the country level could grow above that, but, I mean, still to be seen. Probably what the second point that I was mentioning is the breakdown of that average. And the breakdown of that average is, as you probably feel yourself, private banks clearly growing more than public banks. Public banks losing market share while private banks gaining market share. We are about to be 50-50 in the market share of both public and private compared to 57-43 that was just some time ago. And I wouldn't be surprised if those lines cross over, with private banks being more -- having more markets. So yes, I mean, volumes are going to be growing probably a little bit less than what everybody expected months or quarters ago. The opportunity for private banks is still there.
Does that affect appetite and asset quality? Well, again, I go back to my previous words. I mean we are not -- we are confident with our risk models. I mean as you see, we have been growing strongly in intense risk segments. So let me say it like that, like finance consumption finance. This is already 4 years. If so, it's throughout the crisis. And it hasn't shown any deterioration in terms of quality.
So appetite will remain more or less where it is. Again, remember, we price credit by legally in terms of risk. We have all the models, et cetera, that I mentioned. I don't want to repeat myself. So I don't see any strong argument here to kind of move from a very positive to very negative, something like that. Santander have always mentioned this, has always been open for business. So we remain as we were 1, 2 or 3 years ago in terms of appetite.
And the last part of your question, Mario, was the competitive environment. Well, I mentioned the acquiring part of the business, which is more intense now. I wouldn't be surprised, but it is more intense now. I mentioned the spreads. You have the fintech world. The fintech world is not new. I always have said that the fintech world is an opportunity, both because it's good competition and second because it's good potential partners if we know how to leverage or partner with them.
But this is -- I mean, if it is not a bank, it's going to be a fintech. If it's not a fintech, it's going to be one of the big communications and social media companies. I mean competition is going to be here. It's going to be intense. It's going to continue. Good for that. We welcome back. It makes us better. When you do not have a strong competition, you become a little bit less aggressive, let me say it like that, or a little bit less worried about what is happening around you. So I mean, quality, again, fintech, banks, we have very good, very strong competition, and we clearly welcome that. I have always shared with you that I also defend full competition, full flexibility in terms of the regulatory things. So I mean we are happy to see these things happening.
Okay. Now we are going to take questions by phone.
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Mr. Rafael Frade from Bradesco would like to make a question.
My question relates to fees, especially on the credit card fees. It was a very impressive 20% growth year-on-year. And if we -- I assume that acquiring business probably is growing less than that. It means that the insurance business is growing even stronger than that. So if you could elaborate a little bit on what's happening here. And second, in addition to this, when I look for the commercial expenses related to cards that you booked on other expenses, it grew 50% year-over-year. So I would like just to understand a little bit what's going on, on the credit card business, on the insurance side, what's the strategy here and how do you see this evolve.
Okay. Thank you, Rafael. Well, credit card business, well, the answer, the first and the obvious answer is, yes, we have been growing strongly, not this quarter, for some time now. I think we have -- I have said we use our strategies here for some time in both current account and noncurrent account holders. On the noncurrent account holders, we were basically, I wouldn't say out of the business, but we were not intense, and we have clearly moved that and changed that in the last couple of years.
I mentioned in my speech, we have -- I think -- well, I think not. This comes from the Apple and the Android store. We have the best credit card app in Brazil today, the Santander Way. Feedback and usage of that app is enormous. So it all leads -- we have different, very good agreements like American Airlines, like other white label agreements. So I mean it all leads to a position in which we have been able to strengthen. We are selling more than 400,000 credit cards per month.
So, I mean, the activity and the evolution is strong, and we think we can keep on with that. Again, with competition, with what I am mentioning, but I think -- we are positive in terms of how this can evolve in the future. And specifically because it's a very good opportunity to not only speak of noncurrent account holders, but to transform them. I don't know anything to current account holders or into other products. So the cross-selling opportunity that I also mentioned in one of my slides is also there.
And the second part of your question has to do with the [ straight-out ] our royalty area. I mean -- I think the Investor Relations team can give you more detail, but it is very single movement in between lines in the P&L. Nothing really to underline. But it's a technical issue that Investor Relations will give you details.
Mr. Jorg Friedemann from Citibank would like to make a question.
Just to try to understand a bit further the dynamics on provisions. Considering that you are part of a Spanish group, I understand that you already incorporate full IFRS to report to the parent. I was comparing the releases of IFRS and BR GAAP and noted that provisions under IFRS imply 17% to 20% higher levels versus the provisions under BR GAAP. It's already contemplating IFRS 9 by any chance. This question is just for me to understand in case this is something [ that could evolve ] for IFRS 9, the potential impacts that this could have.
Thank you, Jorg. Yes. You are right. I mean we do present IFRS 9 in the -- what we call Spanish criteria or in the group numbers, and we do not follow BR GAAP here. Believe me that IFRS 9 is a little bit more complicated than a simple 1-minute answer, but I will try to -- I mean to -- you to understand. As you know, you have 3 stages in IFRS 9. The more you grow, the more you provision upfront, but it converges with time, okay? That's basically the main idea I want to share with you.
So if you go all out, you will have kind of upfront provisions happening, and that will lead to less provisions happening in the future. That's basically the main idea and the main difference.
We have been working in IFRS 9, as I said already, for 3 years now, I said 2 years, 3 years now. We expect Basel to implement IFRS 9 in the next, I don't know, quarters or years. We will welcome that. And we are fully prepared in terms of know-how and knowledge. I mean this is -- we used to. When we started with this, we used to run in parallel for several quarters so that it could be addressed in the right way.
So, so far, this is the situation. When you compare criteria in terms of local and IFRS, et cetera, taking the net numbers, it's a little bit tricky, okay? Because you do have other impacts, a little long to explain here now, but you have other impacts that are not as simple as just making the difference. That will be my main comment here. I mean it's a short answer, but the alternative is really long.
[Operator Instructions] Mr. Otávio Tanganelli from Crédit Suisse would like to make a question.
I have a question regarding the other NII. We saw a very resilient performance of this line roughly around BRL 2.5 billion this quarter, repeating the performance in previous quarter. How do expect this to continue going forward? Should we expect the decline of this line going further throughout the year?
Thank you, Otávio. Well, I have addressed this in past quarters also. I mean we -- I anticipated to you that I didn't -- I mean this depends on some volatility, depending on the drop in treasury activities from our investment banking unit, that I remember to you this is separate from the ALM, from the capital remuneration and from the other revenues that we have in that area that I have shared with you in the past.
But it comes to -- in the region. I mean this is the last -- I think it's 3, 4 quarters because we were somehow stable because of the offsetting of the different trends. It has to do with a structural position, that as I've already shared with you also in the past, we haven't moved that. So I mean difficult to estimate. I understand only the concept of those kind of rise, kind of a rite to some part of the analyst. But for us, it's part of the business as I have already argumented in the past.
So stability is how we have been showing this in the past and to [ see ] a strong movement. There will be volatility. Yes. There will be volatility because it has some volatility elements within the line. But that's all I can say on this line. I mean nothing new. Although there were some doubts in the past, nothing new that I can see that is happening now and that we will happen in the future.
Thank you. The Q&A session is over, and I wish to hand over to Mr. Angel Santodomingo for his closing remarks.
I think that you're saying to me that we have a last question? Is that right?
Mr. Carlos Gomez from HSBC would like to make a question.
Actually, 2 questions. First, as you mentioned, your dividend is -- the dividend and interest on capital is higher than in the past. You are paying BRL 1 billion per quarter. Are you giving any indications for what your payout should be this year? And second, I'm not seeing any current increase in goodwill in terms of the minorities of Getnet.
Yes. That was minorities of Getnet. Okay, Carlos. Thank you. Getnet minorities. On interest on capital, you're right. I mean remember in 2017, we moved from paying almost once per year. We paid [ another ] dividend in August, and the bulk of it in December to our quarterly payment. That was a move we wanted to make with the market. We started paying BRL 500 million per quarter in 2017. That was moved to BRL 600 million per quarter in 2018. And the Board has approved BRL 1 billion this year as the first Q.
But theoretically, and this is up to the Board, I'm not going to anticipate what they will neither discussing nor, of course, deciding. But theoretically, we follow patterns from last year's. This should keep on being the same quantity by quarter.
Now payout, well, we can work around 50% payout. That will be probably our idea today, which means we'll maintain return on equity where they are and growth of risk-weighted assets of around, I don't know, close to 10%. That gives us an idea of a 50% payout ratio to keep on with the same capital ratio. So around there probably is a good guideline.
And minorities of Getnet, I didn't understand the second question, but, I mean, they have been bought. I -- we executed the -- we announced the 11% acquisition, so we have 100%. I think we are expecting still some small authorization. I am not sure if it has 100% approval or not, but it's a pure regulatory process. So it's nothing -- it's already agreed and we are there, okay?
Well, I think with that, we end now the Q&A session. Thank you for your questions. Thank you for your participation. I am quite happy to show you another set of results, another strong set of results and profitability. And I look forward to sharing with you next quarter results in next quarters. Thank you.
Banco Santander (Brasil)'s conference call has come to the end. We thank you for your participation. Have a nice day.