Alfen NV
AEX:ALFEN
| US |
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
Financial Services
|
| US |
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
Health Care
|
| US |
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
Energy
|
| US |
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
| US |
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
Technology
|
| US |
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
|
| US |
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
Technology
|
| CN |
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
Industrial Conglomerates
|
| US |
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
Banking
|
| US |
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
Beverages
|
| US |
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
Retail
|
| US |
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
Telecommunication
|
If you don’t study any companies, you have the same success buying stocks as you do in a poker game if you bet without looking at your cards.
Utilize notes to systematically review your investment decisions. By reflecting on past outcomes, you can discern effective strategies and identify those that underperformed. This continuous feedback loop enables you to adapt and refine your approach, optimizing for future success.
Each note serves as a learning point, offering insights into your decision-making processes. Over time, you'll accumulate a personalized database of knowledge, enhancing your ability to make informed decisions quickly and effectively.
With a comprehensive record of your investment history at your fingertips, you can compare current opportunities against past experiences. This not only bolsters your confidence but also ensures that each decision is grounded in a well-documented rationale.
Do you really want to delete this note?
This action cannot be undone.
| 52 Week Range |
11.06
63.32
|
| Price Target |
|
We'll email you a reminder when the closing price reaches EUR.
Choose the stock you wish to monitor with a price alert.
|
|
Johnson & Johnson
NYSE:JNJ
|
US |
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Inc
NYSE:BRK.A
|
US |
|
|
Bank of America Corp
NYSE:BAC
|
US |
|
|
Mastercard Inc
NYSE:MA
|
US |
|
|
UnitedHealth Group Inc
NYSE:UNH
|
US |
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corp
NYSE:XOM
|
US |
|
|
Pfizer Inc
NYSE:PFE
|
US |
|
|
Palantir Technologies Inc
NYSE:PLTR
|
US |
|
|
Nike Inc
NYSE:NKE
|
US |
|
|
Visa Inc
NYSE:V
|
US |
|
|
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
NYSE:BABA
|
CN |
|
|
3M Co
NYSE:MMM
|
US |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co
NYSE:JPM
|
US |
|
|
Coca-Cola Co
NYSE:KO
|
US |
|
|
Walmart Inc
NYSE:WMT
|
US |
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc
NYSE:VZ
|
US |
This alert will be permanently deleted.
Alfen NV
You don't have any saved screeners yet
Hello, and welcome to the Alfen Q1 2021 Trading update. My name is Rosie, and I'll be your coordinator for today's event. Please note this call is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over to Marco Roeleveld, CEO, to begin today's conference. Thank you.
Thank you, Rosie. Good morning, everybody, and welcome to this webcast regarding the 2021 first quarter trading update of Alfen. We appreciate the fact you have taken the effort to participate. This webcast, and the questions that may come forward, are handled by Jeroen van Rossen, CFO; and myself, Marco Roeleveld, CEO. We are happy how the first quarter has resolved. A solid quarter with further revenue growth in combination with a positive development of our profitability and a strong outlook for future growth. In this webcast, we will start with an update of COVID in relation to Alfen. And then we will continue with the highlights of the first quarter, followed by a short review per business line. Next, we will go in more detail regarding our financials and outlook. Assuming you've noted the use of disclaimer, you can now go to Sheet 3 with an update of the COVID situation in relation to Alfen. We are in the midst of the COVID crisis, and therefore, our #1 priority remains the health and safety of our employees and partners. Up to this point, we have managed to keep our business going. To continue safe and responsible operation, we continue to enforce strict safety measures. And we expect COVID to stay -- to still have some impact on revenues in the short term, while we continue to anticipate a long-term positive market development for all our business lines. We will continue with Slide 4 with the highlights of the first quarter of 2021. In this first quarter, we realized a revenue of EUR 53.8 million. This represents a growth of 22% compared to the same period last year. This growth was driven by a strong growth at Energy storage and EV charging equipment. The gross margin was 36.5%. This is in line with average gross margin of last year, but almost 2% points higher than in the same period last year. As a percentage of revenue, the adjusted EBITDA improved from 10.4% in the first quarter of 2020 to 13.3% in the same period this year. We are positive about all the drivers for future growth. COVID has had an impact on our markets, but most European governments have expressed their commitment to further facilitate the energy transition as we reconfirm our 2021 full year revenue outlook of EUR 225 million to EUR 250 million. Later on, in this presentation Jeroen will go in more details on the financials. In the commentary sheet, we'll go in more detail on our -- on each of our business lines. We started Sheet 5 with Smart grids solution, where the revenue was slightly higher than in the same period last year. The moderate growth is driven by a combination of COVID impact and the production ramp-up of a new innovative substation range for Enexis, which now has been successfully completed. At the same time, the momentum in Smart grids is increasing. And the backlog at the end of the first quarter was 27% higher compared with the same period last year. We produced less substations in Q1 '21 compared to the same quarter last year. However, the product mix shifted to larger and more complex substations, and we executed relatively more project work. We now continue on Sheet 6, regarding EV charging equipment where we have realized a revenue growth of 46%. We benefit from a growing market for electrical vehicles. And as a consequence, more demand for home, semi-public and on-street public charges. Further internalization is also a strong growth driver. Our revenue outside the Netherlands more than doubled, and is now approximately 60% of our revenues. Although COVID has an impact on the delivery of EVs, we are convinced of the long-term trend towards e-mobility. Therefore, we keep expanding our sales teams in the various European countries. To support the strong growth of our EV charging business line, we continue to further optimize our production facility. And from a supply chain perspective, a high demand for electrical components is putting pressure on the supply chain throughout the world. We are also experiencing some supply chain challenges. However, up to this point, we have been able to mitigate them. We now continue on Slide 7 regarding Energy storage system, while we have realized a strong revenue growth compared to the same period last year. We benefited from new contract wins and progress of completion of earlier secured contracts. Decision-making in some projects is still being delayed as a result of COVID, although the momentum continues to grow in this market. The growing number of renewables, solar and wind energy, are increasingly driving the need for energy storage to offset the mismatch of electricity supply and demand. Jeroen, may I ask you to continue?
Yes. Thank you, Marco. Let's have a deeper look at the Q1 financials on Slide #8. Starting with the graph on the top left-hand of the slide, where you can see that our revenues increased from EUR 44.1 million in the first quarter of 2020 to EUR 53.8 million in the first quarter of 2021. This growth of 22% was predominantly driven by Energy storage and EV charging equipment. Our gross margin was 36.5% compared with 34.8% in the same quarter of last year. Our adjusted EBITDA was EUR 7.2 million, being 13.3% of revenues compared with EUR 4.6 million, being 10.4% of revenues in Q1 2020. This increase of our adjusted EBITDA is the result of a combination of gross margin increase and operational leverage. So, from the highlights of the financials, we now go to the outlook on the next slide. We expect COVID to continue to have some impact on our markets until the vaccination schemes successfully get the virus under control and restrictions can be fully lifted. At the same time, as Marco also mentioned, the transition to a clean carbon-free energy system is building more and more momentum across Europe. Therefore, we continue to anticipate long-term positive market developments for all of our business lines and thus, continue to invest in our organization, production facilities and innovations for the future. For 2021, taking everything into account, we reconfirm our full year revenue guidance in the range of EUR 225 million to EUR 250 million. We are now at the end of the presentation, where I will hand over to the moderator for any questions. Moderator, could you please take over?
[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Peter Olofsen from Kepler Cheuvreux.
Yes. I have 2 questions. The first is on raw materials. What are you seeing in terms of raw material cost inflation? And to what extent is that affecting your gross margin? Or are you able to compensate for that? And I would be particularly interested in the EV charging business. And then my second question is on Energy storage, where on the one hand, you mentioned that Q1 sales benefited from some new projects. On the other hand, you also state that you're still seeing some delayed decision-making. So could you shed some light on the overall momentum that you are seeing in Energy storage and in the market, and what your current sales funnel and pipeline look like?
Yes, Peter. Thanks for the questions. I'll start with the question on raw materials and supply chain. There's pressure on the supply chain throughout the world, mainly related to electrical components, which is referring to your phrase about EV charging as well. Well, we have been able to mitigate those and keep our supply chain intact. You know we have a multiple-sourcing philosophy. And we're in a constant contact with our suppliers. We have a diversified supplier portfolio. We also are in direct contact with manufacturers of those components.Fair to say that sometimes you have to take a decision, for example, to get the components through air instead of through boat, which is then slightly cost increasing. But all in all, you also know that we have our purchasing programs in place, which are gaining power every day, and ahead in time. So, all in all, we can say that at the moment, we are still able to compensate for these price increases. And also, for example, with copper, we also take positions in there. So that's how we monitor that supply chain and those pricing on a more or less daily basis, I would say. So, we're really on top of that. And I think the second question is related to Energy storage. Well, yes, we say -- we said at year-end, we said that you saw that we felt that the momentum was coming back into the Energy storage market. Fair to say that we cannot always communicate about a project because that's also depending on whether a customer wants that to be published. But all in all, we definitely see that we have been able to execute and have progress on the backlog that we have and on the orders that we have. And at the same time, we do -- we said at the annual accounts, we feel that the momentum is coming back into the Energy storage market. And that is unchanged. We definitely see that our project pipeline is evaluating and is growing. So, we feel that the Energy storage market is making a next step in maturity.
Okay. I know that in terms of guidance, you're usually not too precise on the individual segments. But would it be fair to say that despite some softer order intake last year that with the renewed momentum Energy storage would see revenue growth this year?
Yes. It's a good question. But for us, a complicated aspect to answer on, is that we, in general, we don't disclose numbers per business line. And we have to also take into account that we always stated that we -- the first, I say, of January in a year or even not on the first of May of the year, we have the full order backlog for the whole year already in portfolio so that we can more or less predict what the revenue will be depending on the same progress of projects. So, we need quite a lot of orders more or less to finalize the year, and in revenue. So, we are more or less convinced of the change in momentum. But on the other hand, we have also seen in the years past that sometimes even if the momentum is there, the final decision-making is always, let's say, is -- we cannot enforce clients to finalize it on a date where it's convenient for us. So therefore, we have taken approach that we -- when we look at our overall revenue for the end of this year. For us, the best way to guide what it is going for is to reconfirm the range in what we are. And that range reflects more or less the positive aspects in market trends and also in getting more momentum, but also it has to take into account some negative aspects like what happens if corona stays there longer and decision-making is delayed, or are there other market aspects that we cannot influence. And at this moment, say, the best valuation of our -- of the market situation is for us is to reconfirm our revenue statement of EUR 225 million to EUR 250 million. Although we also say that, say, the outlook -- the market trend is positive for us when we see it not only for this year, but also the years after.
But Peter, you know -- and I understand the question. We always said that the fastest-growing market segments are Energy storage and EV charging. So yes, of course, we are aiming for a growth compared to 2020.
And then the final question on Energy storage. Back in February, you talked also about you being capable to do larger projects than you did in the past. Are you already seeing larger projects in the pipeline in the sales funnel than before?
Yes.
The next question comes from the line of Thijs Berkelder from ABN AMRO-ODDO BHF.
Congratulations, good results. I got some questions from Lotte. So, a question on Smart grids. Your revenues in Q1 were up 1%, but you stated backlog is up 27%. This backlog 27% in euro terms for a number of terms. And this backlog I presume is for the remainder of the year. Is that correct? Yes or no? Then maybe can you give an update on the rent up in the number of FTEs right now? And maybe what you're targeting there to end up with -- at the end of the year? And similar maybe on sales costs. And finally, coming back on Energy storage. As I recall, let's say, the prime battery packages you were using more BMW packages. Do you already have plenty BMW packages, and then, let's say, in your inventory, to, let's say, at least do the Energy storage projects you envision for the coming year or maybe 2 years? How should I look at that?
Well, let's start with the question on the backlog. That's indeed in euros. So, it's 27% higher in euro value. It is the backlog situation at the end of Q1. So that is reflecting the period in time compared with the same situation last year. Of course, we continue to have new ordering and new production. So we emphasize this increase in backlog to give the momentum in the Smart grids market, where you see that we had a moderate growth of just 1% in the first quarter, which we explained in the Q3 trading update, it was the issuance of the annual accounts, where we said, okay, we have some impact of COVID there, and we also see that we are in the -- still in the ramp-up of...
[Technical Difficulty] Thank you very much for reconnecting us. So Jeroen, if you would like to continue.
I don't know precisely where -- what you heard. So..
[indiscernible]
Ramp of FTE.
Ramp of FTE, was that -- so you heard everything about Smart grids, is that correct?
I heard reflecting momentum in Smart grids market in Q4 and Q1, some COVID-related problems and then I was disconnected.
Okay. Because I was saying that we also show by this increase in the backlog that we see that the momentum is getting back into that market area as well. So that is reflecting the outlook that we have on the Smart grid business. The question related to full-time equivalents and sales costs, well, we always said that we continue to invest in the organization. But that's the pace in which we will grow that will be slower than the growth of the top line. Well, that is still the aim that's still where we are striving for. Of course, you can imagine that from a period-to-period, quarter-to-quarter, that can be slightly different. But we don't give the precise numbers, but we increased our FTEs, and we keep on continuing investing in the organization to anticipate all the future growth, and the further growth that we see. So that's what I can say about that. And then Marco for you...
I will take the aspect of storage. Like we always have stated that we are -- for our battery storage system, battery agnostic. We do not depend only on 1 brand or 1 make of battery manufacturer. And of course, what you can assume is that when we see that the market is growing. We see also that say the demand for batteries is quite high. And we've secured, say, on suppliers, the production capacity for batteries in, say, the remaining part of this year, be able to translate it to orders that we are having in portfolio now. And that we foresee that we will go get in the coming period. And we're quite confident that there is a balance between, say, our outlook for orders in combination with the amount of batteries we have secured, and that we try to balance that as best so that we'll not have too much in stock, on the other hand, that we have enough batteries in the pipeline to be able to cope with new contracts.
Yes. Okay. Just a short follow-up on the Smart grids backlog. What is more or less a lead time of the Smart grid backlog?
Well, it's, of course, a combination of projects and products backlog. In the products that's around 6 weeks delivery time. So, you should think about that. And in the projects, it's a bit depending per project. We have projects which have same lead times, but we also have projects which tend to have longer lead times, depending on the execution of those projects. So, it's a mixture, but it's definitely not that this is the backlog, which is the only backlog for the rest of the year.
Our next question comes from the line of Jan Richard from Berenberg.
Yes. I have 3 of them, please. Firstly, I'm coming back on Peter's comment on raw material costs. Jeroen you did -- said at the end of your comment that you take position on copper. Could you please elaborate a bit more on this because I think this is a key raw material for you guys. So, I just wanted to hear a bit more what that means exactly, please.
Yes. What we do with copper. So, we use copper, of course, in our products. And copper is manufactured by one of our suppliers. But we -- for critical components, we tend to monitor and keep control of the supply chain ourselves. So, the situation here is that we directly buy and fix the pricing on copper, both on the quantity as well as on a pricing perspective. And then that copper as a component is supplied to the manufacturer who is then putting it into the raw materials that we use in our production process. So that is how we look at that. So, we are not depending on a supplier to safeguard the copper, we safeguard the copper ourselves.
Okay. And how successful are you in passing on increases in raw material cost to your customers? I guess it depends if they increase it sudden or not, but just generally speaking.
Yes. Generally speaking, what you see is that if there are increasing raw material prices that also gives rise to, of course, discussions with your customers. You know that it -- in the contracts with the grid operators, we have indexation clauses, but they are not directly one-on-one related with raw material pricing. There are a couple of factors that you take into account, and then you discuss that at the end of the year and define the indexation for the year to come. Which you can imagine, especially in the more project part and selling transformer substations to other parties than the grid operators. There, of course, if raw material prices are increasing. You also discussed that with your customers.
Okay. That's clear. And then 2 questions on storage. The first one is, could you please give us a bit more color on the proportion of Q1 revenues attributable to contracts won in the second half of last year as opposed to contracts which you won end of 2019, early 2020?
Yes. I appreciate the question, Jan. We don't give that precise split. The only thing what we can say is that it's partly related to contract won in 2020, it's but also partly related to new ordering in 2021. So, it's a mixture of elements there. And that's how it's built up.
Okay. And can you please tell us how much of revenues in storage in the last, let's say, 6 months, come from framework agreements as opposed to more one-off projects, just to see sort of momentum you can see in this business?
Well, we cannot give that precise split. But what we can say is that we emphasize the fact that there are framework agreements that we concluded last year to also show that we feel that there is a next step in the majority of the Energy storage market. And we also see that grid ordering is coming from those framework agreements. So that's what we definitely see. So, we do have a mixture of customers who are looking at 1 or 2 projects. We have customers who have framework agreements and are already planning ahead in time. So, it's a real mixture of all elements. But I think the most important thing is that where you saw that COVID definitely had an impact on the Energy storage market. And it seems like that the step-up in the storage market was back again. We already emphasized that the issuance of the annual report that we felt that the momentum is coming back in that market. And we definitely see that today that, that momentum seems to be getting back in the market. So, there's a lot of requests and there's also a good development of our sales pipeline in that area.
Very clear. And lastly, still on storage, I mean talking about software, it plays a critical role in, of course, delivering value to your customers. And we've seen some interesting trends over the last few months as energy companies boosting their digital capabilities through M&A. So, my question here is, do you feel you're in a position to continue to develop your software on your own and keep up with your peers? Or you're potentially looking at potential targets in the software space? Yes. Just give a bit more information on that would be very helpful.
Jan, Marco here. I will try to answer this question. If we look at the position we take in the value chain, maybe we're starting with EV charging, we are not in the area of making back-office systems. This all software-related to back-office systems and in billing through back-office systems and all kind of protocols that are in that area is not the area we're talking about when we talk about software development. We are more or less within the charging stations try to envision what are the requirements in relation from, say, those back-office systems related to our product, and we try to come up with all kind of smart software features, whether it is low [indiscernible], et cetera, et cetera, that's within our product. We don't interfere with the business cases and software capability our customers. And so that we are not also -- that we don't see a risk there that we are developing the wrong set of software. If you take the same approach to battery storage, we don't develop a scatter systems that are valid for, say, our end customers that have to value how much energy from a wind farm is being translated to, say, the trading aspects of when to store or when to stop transferring energy to the grid. We are fully controlling our own set of hardware with all kind of software features to optimize interconnection to the scatter systems of the customer, but we don't interfere into the scatter systems of our customers. So we are more or less quite well secured of well, more or less happy with this approach because it's more or less ones that we don't expect customers to interface directly with our hardware because that is very complicated for them to envision how to control the whole product performing in itself. So that we are more or less limit ourselves to the interface, and leave it to the customers to do all trading aspects and control of the overall site.
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Maarten Verbeek from the Idea-Driven Equities Analyses Company.
It's Maarten. A couple of questions from my end. First of all, within the Smart grid, we have seen quite a jump in much larger and much more complex substation. Is this a trend to continue? And is this also favorably for your profitability?
If we look at, say, the [indiscernible] markets, the grid market, then we see that the grid operators, the relationships, [indiscernible] that they did already several years before in different type of switch care, where we have to accommodate our substations to be ready for those bigger installations that makes us, as a more direct consequence, the substation are to be bigger also. And we have seen that in the [ tenders of the next case ] where this was combined, say quite advanced requirements, [indiscernible] for example, with fire safety. It meant that [indiscernible] complex. And that that's a reflection on, say, the overall price, not directly in relationship to the margin, but in directly to the overall price of a substation.We've seen a shift [indiscernible] that have shifted to different type of switch care, and we had to more or less accommodate that with a bigger substation to cope with that. It's truly a first step related to the price of a substation in relation to size. And of course, as an aspect on margin, we're, of course, always trying to look at, say, savings in our [indiscernible] process, savings on the materials to be able to increase our margin, but those are 2 independent processes.
Okay. With respect to EV charging, you have now disclosed the breakdown between the Netherlands and outside the Netherlands. To get a feel for the different growth rates, could you also provide that ratio for the first quarter of 2020? And could you also rank your top 3 countries outside of the Netherlands in the first quarter of '21?
Yes. We don't give the precise numbers there. We -- you know we have an internationalization strategy. So, what we show here is that we definitely see that internationalization strategy is working. We sell our charge points in more than 25 European countries, and we spread out our salespeople over all these countries. It is fair to say that you see at the Netherlands is one of the most developed EV charging countries and still there, there's a lot of new charge points which are needed for -- especially if we want to reach the 2030 climate goals. So also, in the Dutch market, there's still a huge growth potential. But we definitely see that the country surrounding the Netherlands are now starting up, especially Germany and the U.K. are fast-growing markets at the moment.
And lastly, could you say something about your development of your net debt situation?
So, we don't give the numbers on net debt. We are strict on monitoring our working capital. So, you can expect us to keep strict on monitoring that working capital in time.
We now have a follow-up question from the line of Thijs Berkelder from ABN AMRO-ODDO BHF.
Yes. Maybe a short question on your entity in Finland and of Sweden. Can you shortly describe what the progress has been there? And the second question is on the charging equipment. Just to understand it. Your revenue growth has been 46% year-on-year, but production of charging points, plus 58%, with the revenues are probably linked to the numbers of starting points sold, not the ones produced. Is the number sold also more like 46% or more like 58%?
In relation to the Finland, we are in a situation that, say, Finland is making use of the fact that they're in the market. There is a transition for, say, open lines to underground lines, where we see a more stable development of the market. The market in Sweden, we are trying to develop it's going slowly. It's more or less to be expected. You cannot, in 1 day, say, okay, let's make it [ division, go to ] Sweden. And then the next day, you only have success. So, we are stepping up there slowly, but we are progressing. But we also make trying to leverage the cross-selling aspect of our country and also the relationship we have, of course, with the substations to grid operators, and partly in the market that are also visible renewables we try to emphasize now the efforts in relationship to the Energy storage possibilities in those markets.
I think the second question was related to EV charging and the growth numbers. Well, to some extent, that is indeed due to producing and selling. The major impact on that element is the product mix. And you know that product mix can shift from a quarter to a quarter. And the major impact on that revenue growth being slightly lower than the production rate is related to that product mix, which was slightly different in the first quarter.
So should I understand that probably -- is primarily the German systems coming into the mix?
No. It's an overall mix, what we see there. So, we see a bit more on the single point instead of the double, and the public charges.
We have no further questions coming through. So, I will now hand back to Marco for any closing remarks.
Okay. This is Marco Roeleveld. I would like to thank everybody for joining in this trading update. And appreciate all the questions to maybe enhance some aspects of our trading update. And speak to you again, say, in a few months' time.
Thank you for joining today's conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.