KYSEF (Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc) vs S&P 500 Comparison

KYSEF

S&P 500

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

KYSEF

S&P 500

Difference

1Y 3Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y

KYSEF

S&P 500

Add Stock

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

S&P 500

KYSEF

J4S

CMC

Add Stock

1Y 3Y 5Y 10Y 15Y 20Y

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc
Glance View

Market Cap

5.3B USD

Industry

Utilities

Nestled in the vibrant landscape of economic rebirth following World War II, Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc. emerged in 1951 as a formidable force in Japan's energy sector. Initially established to meet the burgeoning electricity demands of the Kyushu region, the company quickly adapted to the diverse challenges that came with Japan's rapid industrialization. With an extensive portfolio that spans thermal, nuclear, and renewable energy sources, Kyushu Electric Power has deftly navigated the complex terrain of energy production and distribution. Known for its strategic emphasis on nuclear power to ensure a stable and reliable energy supply, the company operates several key nuclear facilities, which significantly contribute to its revenue streams. As it supplies energy, Kyushu Electric Power generates income through a combination of electricity sales and energy services, tailoring solutions to accommodate both individual and industrial needs. In recent years, Kyushu Electric Power has embarked on an ambitious journey towards integrating renewable energy sources and developing innovative technologies to reduce carbon emissions. This strategic pivot sits well with global shifts towards sustainable practices, as the company harnesses the potential of solar, wind, and geothermal sources to cater to environmental concerns and regulatory requirements. Moreover, by engaging in energy-related consulting services and overseas ventures, it seeks to diversify its revenue and expand its market footprint beyond Japan. The corporate ethos reflects a balanced fusion of tradition and innovation, ensuring the company remains not only a central player in Japan's power sector but also an influencer in the global energy landscape. Having balanced economic viability with sustainable practices, Kyushu Electric Power Co., Inc. continues to illuminate the future, driving forward with a legacy of resilience and adaptation.

View KYSEF Analysis

KYSEF Intrinsic Value

Undervaluation 72%

Intrinsic Value

Price

What is Intrinsic Value?

Economic Moat is a concept popularized by Warren Buffett to describe a company's durable competitive advantage. It represents the 'moat' that protects a company from competitors and helps it sustain profitability over the long term. Our analysis of the past 10 years showed that companies with a wide economic moat significantly outperformed the market, delivering +645% returns compared to +189% for the S&P 500.

Our research into Economic Moat performance spans the past 10 years and focuses on companies with a wide economic moat. For this analysis, we calculated the average stock price returns of these companies, comparing them to the performance of the S&P 500 index over the same period.

The results were compelling: wide moat stocks achieved a remarkable +645% average return, compared to +188% for the broader market. This difference highlights the long-term benefits of investing in businesses that can maintain their market position and pricing power over time.

Note: This research does not account for survivorship bias. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Determining whether a company has an economic moat requires both a deep dive into financial metrics and a qualitative assessment of its competitive position. Our analysts conduct a rigorous evaluation that focuses on identifying structural advantages that enable a company to sustain profitability and defend its market share over the long term.

The process begins with an analysis of a company’s historical financial performance. We assess how consistently the company has generated returns above its cost of capital and whether those returns have been stable or improving. However, financial performance alone doesn’t reveal the full picture. To understand the sources of these advantages, we evaluate five key drivers of economic moats:

Network Effect: We analyze whether the value of a company’s product or service grows as its user base expands. Platforms like payment systems or marketplaces benefit from this self-reinforcing.

Switching Costs: We assess whether customers face significant costs or disruptions when switching to a competitor’s product or service. High switching costs create customer stickiness and provide pricing power.

Intangible Assets: Strong brands, patents, and regulatory licenses can protect a company’s market position by creating barriers for competitors or enabling premium pricing. For example, a well-recognized consumer brand may command higher customer loyalty and margins.

Efficient scale: Occurs when a market is optimally served by one or a few players, making it unprofitable for new entrants to compete. This typically happens in industries with high fixed costs or geographic constraints, such as utilities or pipelines.

Cost Advantage: Companies with structural cost advantages can produce goods or services at a lower cost than their competitors, enabling them to offer competitive pricing or maintain higher margins. These advantages often arise from economies of scale, superior supply chain management, or proprietary technology. Firms like Walmart leverage their massive scale to negotiate better terms with suppliers, allowing them to undercut competitors on price.

By examining these factors in combination with a company’s financial performance and market positioning, we classify each company into one of three categories:

This rigorous evaluation ensures that our moat ratings are both comprehensive and reliable, giving investors the tools they need to make well-informed, long-term decisions.

KYSEF

vs

S&P 500

Stocks Performance
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance Gap
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance By Year
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Competitors Performance
Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc vs Peers

Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc
Glance View

Company

Help

Tools

Stocks

KYSEF vs S&P 500

Stocks Performance KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance Gap KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance By Year KYSEF vs S&P 500

Competitors Performance Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc vs Peers

Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc Glance View

Company

Help

Tools

Stocks

KYSEF

vs

S&P 500

Stocks Performance
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance Gap
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Performance By Year
KYSEF vs S&P 500

Competitors Performance
Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc vs Peers

Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc
Glance View