` IMS (Immsi SpA) vs DAX Index Comparison - Alpha Spread

IMS
vs
DAX Index

Over the past 12 months, IMS has underperformed DAX Index, delivering a return of -5% compared to the DAX Index's 22% growth.

Stocks Performance
IMS vs DAX Index

Loading
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Performance Gap
IMS vs DAX Index

Loading
IMS
DAX Index
Difference

Performance By Year
IMS vs DAX Index

Loading
IMS
DAX Index
Add Stock
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Competitors Performance
Immsi SpA vs Peers

DAX Index
IMS
BAJAJ-AUTO
EICHERMOT
TVSMOTOR
HEROMOTOCO
Add Stock
No Stocks Selected

Compare the stock's returns with its benchmark index and competitors. Gain insights into its relative performance over time.

Select Stock to Compare

Immsi SpA
Glance View

Market Cap
181.2m EUR
Industry
Automobiles

IMMSI SpA operates as a holding company. The company is headquartered in Mantova, Mantova and currently employs 5,997 full-time employees. The company went IPO on 2000-02-15. The firm structures its business into three sectors: Industrial, Naval sector and Property and Holding. The Industrial sector operates through Piaggio group, which is engaged in the production of scooters, motorbikes and commercial vehicles, including three- and four-wheelers. The Naval sector, through Intermarine SpA and other subsidiaries, is active in the construction and marketing of maritime, defense and leisure boats, such as ferries, yachts, fast patrol boats and mine warfare vessels. The Property and Holding sector operates in the real estate industry, including the management of a golf resort, commercial and residential real estate development, among others, as well as is engaged in the financial investments in Alitalia-Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA.

IMS Intrinsic Value
3.556 EUR
Undervaluation 85%
Intrinsic Value
Price
I
Back to Top